A handheld field maintenance bus monitor is provided. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor is coupleable to at least one process communication loop, and is configured to capture and store a selected quantity of digital communication observed on the process communication loop during a capture period. Optionally, the handheld field maintenance bus monitor may be configured to couple to and interact with process communication loops of at least two different process communication protocols, such as HART® and FOUNDATION™. A method of analyzing captured and stored communication data is also provided.
|
12. A method of capturing digital information on a process communication loop, the method comprising:
setting a capture start condition and a capture end condition;
coupling a handheld field maintenance bus monitor to the process communication loop;
detecting satisfaction of the capture start condition;
capturing and storing all digital communication information observed on the process communication loop in the handheld field maintenance bus monitor until the capture end condition is detected;
arranging the digital communication information according to time; and
providing the stored digital communication information.
1. A handheld field maintenance bus monitor comprising:
a plurality of terminals coupleable to a process communication loop;
at least one media access unit coupled to the plurality of terminals and configured to receive digital process communication data from the process communication loop in accordance with an industry standard protocol;
a controller coupled to the at least one media access unit and configured to receive the digital process communication data from the at least one media access unit;
memory coupled to the controller to store the digital process communication data received from the at least one media access unit;
a user interface configured to allow a user to define a condition configured to trigger a capture period;
wherein, upon the occurrence of the condition, the handheld field maintenance bus monitor stores all digital process communication data occurring on the process communication loop in the memory during the capture period and groups the digital process communication data according to time.
2. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
3. The field maintenance bus monitor of
4. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
5. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
6. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
7. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
8. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
9. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
10. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
11. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
|
Intrinsically safe handheld field maintenance tools are known. Such tools are highly useful in the process control and measurement industry to allow operators to conveniently communicate with and/or interrogate field devices in a given process installation. Examples of such process installations include petroleum, pharmaceutical, chemical, pulp and other processing installations. In such installations, the process control and measurement network may include tens or even hundreds of various field devices which periodically require maintenance to ensure that such devices are functioning properly and/or calibrated. Moreover, when one or more errors in the process control and measurement installation is detected, the use of an intrinsically safe hand held field maintenance tool allows technicians to quickly diagnose such errors in the field.
One such device is sold under the trade designation Model 375 Field Communicator available from Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., of Austin, Tex. The Model 375 is an intrinsically safe handheld field maintenance tool that supports communication with field devices of at least two different process communication protocols. In particular, the Model 375 is designed to support HART® and FOUNDATION™ fieldbus devices from many vendors. Moreover, the Model 375 can be used to perform diagnostics for effective startup and trouble shooting of Foundation™ Fieldbus segments. The Model 375 can allow a technician to create a quality segment by diagnosing the network DC voltage and average noise. Moreover, power supply problems can be detected by monitoring low frequency noise on a segment and incorrect terminations and faulty devices can be diagnosed by observing the communications signal level.
In situations where a faulty device is communicating with an appropriate communication signal level, but the communications themselves are erroneous, the diagnostics of prior art handheld field maintenance tools may not suffice. In such cases, relatively larger, and potentially non-intrinsically safe devices such as computers with suitable hardware adaptations are used to essentially capture communication on the process loop in order to allow a technician to diagnose the communication errors. Typically, such computers or control system are located away from the field devices in a control room. Accordingly, if a change is made to a field device in the field, in order to address a communication error, the technician must return to the control room in order to invoke, or otherwise engage, bus monitor functionality in the control system to observe communication of the affected field device.
A handheld field maintenance bus monitor is provided. The handheld field maintenance bus monitor is coupleable to at least one process communication loop and is configured to capture and store a selected quantity of digital communication observed on the process communication loop during a capture period. Optionally, the handheld field maintenance bus monitor may be configured to couple to and interact with process communication loops of at least two different process communication protocols, such as HART® and FOUNDATION™. A method of analyzing captured and stored communication data is also provided.
In this illustration, process communication or process control loop 18 is a FOUNDATION™ fieldbus process communication loop and is coupled to field devices 20, which are shown coupled arranged in a multi-drop configuration. An alternative process communication loop (not shown) is an HART® process communication loop.
Intrinsically safe handheld field maintenance device 22 is coupled to loop 18 as illustrated in
Processor 36 is also coupled to keypad module 38 and display module 40. Keypad module 38 is coupled to the keypad on the housing of device 22 in order to receive various keypad inputs from a user. Display module 40 is coupled to a display to provide data and/or a user interface.
Device 22 preferably includes infrared data access port 42, removable memory module 44 and expansion memory module 48. Infrared data access port 42 is coupled to processor 36 to allow device 22 to transfer information to and from a separate device using infrared wireless communication. One advantageous use of port 42 is transferring data captured by device 22 when used as a bus monitor, which use will be described in greater detail below. Another advantageous use of port 42 is for transferring and/or updating Device Descriptions stored in one or more memories of tool 22. A Device Description (DD) is a software technology used to describe parameters in a field device in a computer-readable format. This contains all of the information necessary for a software application being executed on processor 36 to retrieve and use the parametric data. The separate device such as computer 12, can obtain a new Device Description from floppy disk, CD ROM, or the internet and wirelessly transfer the new Device Description to tool 22.
In one embodiment, removable memory module 44 is removably coupled to processor 36 via port/interface 46. Removable memory module 44 is adapted to store any suitable data including captured digital communications, and/or software applications that can be executed instead of primary applications on processor 36. For example, module 44 may contain applications that use the HART® or FOUNDATION™ fieldbus communication port, to provide a comprehensive diagnostic for a given process valve. Additionally, module 44 may store software applications that aid in the calibration or configuration of specific devices. Module 44 may also store a software image for a new or updated primary device application that can subsequently be transferred into the non-volatile memory of device 36 to enable execution of the updated application. Further still, module 44 provides removable memory storage for the configuration of multiple devices allowing a field maintenance operator to acquire a relatively substantial amount of device data and conveniently store or transfer such data by simply removing module 44.
Preferably, module 44 is adapted to be replaceable in hazardous areas in a process plant. Thus, it is preferred that module 44 comply with intrinsic safety requirements set forth in: APPROVAL STANDARD INTRINSICALLY SAFE APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED APPARATUS FOR USE IN CLASS I, II AND III, DIVISION 1 HAZARDOUS (CLASSIFIED) LOCATIONS, CLASS NUMBER 3610, promulgated by Factory Mutual Research October, 1988. Adaptations to comply with additional industrial standards such as Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and the European CENELEC standards are also contemplated. Examples of specific structural adaptations for memory module 44 and/or interface 46 to facilitate compliance include energy limiting circuits such that the operating voltage level of memory module 44 is sufficiently low that stored energy within module 44 cannot generate a source of ignition. Additionally, module 44 may include current limiting circuitry to ensure that in the event that specific terminals on module 44 are shorted, that the discharge energy is sufficiently low that ignition is inhibited. Finally, interface 46 may include physical characteristics that are specifically designed to prevent exposure of electrical contacts on memory module 44 to an external environment while simultaneously allowing suitable interface contacts to make electrical contact with module 44. For example, module 44 may include an over-modeling that can be pierced or otherwise displaced by coupling module 44 to interface 46.
Device 22 also preferably includes expansion memory module 48 coupled to processor 36 via connector 50 which is preferably disposed on the main board of device 22. Module 48 may include a software application that, when executed by device 22, causes device 22 to function as a handheld field maintenance bus monitor in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Expansion memory module 48 may also contain Device Descriptions of first and second industry standard protocols. Module 48 may also contain license code(s) that will determine the functionality of device 22 with respect to the multiple protocols. For example, data residing within module 48 may indicate that tool device is only authorized to operate within a single process industry standard mode, such as the HART® protocol. Ultimately, a different setting of that data within module 48 may indicate that device 22 is authorized to operate in accordance with two or more industry standard protocols. Module 48 is preferably inserted to a connector 50 on the main board and may in fact require partial disassembly of device 22, such as removing the battery pack to access port 50.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Franchuk, Brian A., Zielinski, Stephen A., Ferguson, Anthony D., Bell, Thomas M.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4337516, | Jun 26 1980 | United Technologies Corporation | Sensor fault detection by activity monitoring |
4517468, | Apr 30 1984 | Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation | Diagnostic system and method |
4540890, | May 24 1982 | Galber Automazione E | System for selectively addressing electrical control signals from a control unit to a plurality of remote units |
4635214, | Jun 30 1983 | Fujitsu Limited | Failure diagnostic processing system |
4642782, | Jul 31 1984 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Rule based diagnostic system with dynamic alteration capability |
4924418, | Feb 10 1988 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Universal monitor |
5005142, | Jan 30 1987 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Smart sensor system for diagnostic monitoring |
5067099, | Nov 03 1988 | DIO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC | Methods and apparatus for monitoring system performance |
5099436, | Nov 03 1988 | DIO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC | Methods and apparatus for performing system fault diagnosis |
5122948, | Jun 28 1990 | Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. | Remote terminal industrial control communication system |
5274572, | Dec 02 1987 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for knowledge-based signal monitoring and analysis |
5305230, | Nov 22 1989 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Process control system and power plant process control system |
5442639, | Oct 12 1993 | SHIP STAR ASSOCIATES, INC | Method and apparatus for monitoring a communications network |
5481200, | Sep 15 1993 | Rosemount Inc | Field transmitter built-in test equipment |
5754596, | Feb 23 1994 | Rosemount Inc. | Field transmitter for storing information |
5764891, | Feb 15 1996 | Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc | Process I/O to fieldbus interface circuit |
5805442, | May 30 1996 | SCHNEIDER AUTOMATION INC | Distributed interface architecture for programmable industrial control systems |
5850523, | Jun 21 1996 | National Instruments Corporation | Method and system for monitoring fieldbus network with multiple packet filters |
5923557, | Aug 01 1997 | Agilent Technologies Inc | Method and apparatus for providing a standard interface to process control devices that are adapted to differing field-bus protocols |
5970430, | Oct 04 1996 | Fisher Controls International LLC | Local device and process diagnostics in a process control network having distributed control functions |
6017143, | Mar 28 1996 | Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc | Device in a process system for detecting events |
6026352, | Sep 03 1997 | Fisher Controls International LLC | Local device and process diagnostics in a process control network having distributed control functions |
6061603, | Sep 10 1997 | Schneider Automation Inc. | System for remotely accessing an industrial control system over a commercial communications network |
6094600, | Feb 06 1996 | FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC , A DE CORP | System and method for managing a transaction database of records of changes to field device configurations |
6119047, | Mar 28 1996 | Rosemount Inc | Transmitter with software for determining when to initiate diagnostics |
6157929, | Apr 15 1997 | CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | System apparatus and method for managing the use and storage of digital information |
6192281, | Oct 04 1996 | Fisher Controls International LLC | Network accessible interface for a process control network |
6211649, | Mar 25 1999 | SOURCENEXT CORPORATION | USB cable and method for charging battery of external apparatus by using USB cable |
6285966, | Jun 25 1998 | Fisher Controls International LLC | Function block apparatus for viewing data in a process control system |
6298377, | Jun 01 1998 | METSO FLOW CONTROL OY | Field device management system |
6317701, | Jun 17 1998 | Metso Field Systems Oy | Field device management system |
6370448, | Oct 13 1997 | Rosemount Inc | Communication technique for field devices in industrial processes |
6377859, | Oct 04 1996 | Fisher Controls International LLC | Maintenance interface device for a use in a process control network |
6397114, | Mar 28 1996 | Rosemount Inc. | Device in a process system for detecting events |
6405099, | Dec 25 1996 | SMC Kabushiki Kaisha | Automatic control system |
6487462, | Jan 22 2000 | Selective process data logger with instant replay | |
6564268, | Mar 17 1999 | ROSEMOUNT, INC ; Rosemount Inc | Fieldbus message queuing method and apparatus |
6611724, | Nov 24 1999 | Square D Company | On line monitor for a control device |
6629059, | May 14 2001 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Hand held diagnostic and communication device with automatic bus detection |
6859755, | May 14 2001 | Rosemount Inc | Diagnostics for industrial process control and measurement systems |
6889166, | Dec 06 2001 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc; Rosemount Inc | Intrinsically safe field maintenance tool |
7117122, | Dec 06 2001 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Field maintenance tool |
7421531, | Jan 12 2005 | Rosemount Inc. | Isolating system that couples fieldbus data to a network |
20030204373, | |||
20030229472, | |||
20040111238, | |||
20040228184, | |||
20040230327, | |||
20040249583, | |||
20060048025, | |||
20060075009, | |||
20060155908, | |||
20060161393, | |||
20060291438, | |||
20080114911, | |||
GB2394124, | |||
JP7244625, | |||
RU94033147, | |||
WO2009003146, | |||
WO2009003148, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 25 2006 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 07 2006 | BELL, THOMAS M | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018613 | /0887 | |
Nov 07 2006 | FERGUSON, ANTHONY D | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018613 | /0887 | |
Nov 07 2006 | FRANCHUK, BRIAN A | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018613 | /0887 | |
Nov 17 2006 | ZIELINSKI, STEPHEN A | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018613 | /0887 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 08 2018 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 15 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 08 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 08 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 08 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 08 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 08 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 08 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 08 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 08 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 08 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 08 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 08 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 08 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |