A field device resident algorithm receives one or more diagnostic inputs and generates actionable service information. The algorithm(s) can be changed or updated after the manufacture of the field device. The actionable service information can be displayed locally or sent over a process control loop. A prediction engine can be employed to determine a period within which such service should be completed.

Patent
   8788070
Priority
Sep 26 2006
Filed
Sep 26 2006
Issued
Jul 22 2014
Expiry
Oct 12 2027
Extension
381 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
1
458
currently ok
1. A field device comprising a process variable transmitter, comprising:
a process variable sensor configured to sense a process variable of an industrial process;
a microprocessor;
a memory operably coupled to the microprocessor;
a plurality of diagnostic inputs operably coupled to the microprocessor;
wherein the microprocessor implements field device resident algorithms based upon instructions stored in the memory including:
a plurality of diagnostic algorithms based upon the plurality of diagnostic inputs, wherein the plurality of diagnostic algorithms provide a service information output indicative of actionable service information comprising a corrective service action which should be performed based upon the plurality of diagnostic inputs;
a prediction engine implemented by a prediction algorithm configured to determine a service interval within which the corrective service action should be performed, the service interval based upon a health indication degradation curve used to predict when a health indication will reach a threshold level and wherein the prediction algorithm is modified based upon successful runtime of the process variable transmitter;
a service message module configured to generate a service message based upon the service interval and the corrective service action; and
I/O circuitry configured to transmit information related to the sensed process variable and further configured to transmit the service message including the corrective service action and an augmented service interval to another location.
2. The field device of claim 1, including a local display coupled to the microprocessor which displays the service message including the corrective service action and wherein the corrective service action is related to at least one of the field device itself, a component coupled to the field device, a second field device, and a process control loop.
3. The field device of claim 1, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes a field device diagnostic input.
4. The field device of claim 2, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes application information.
5. The field device of claim 2, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes a process variable.
6. The field device of claim 2, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes process variability.
7. The field device of claim 2, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes a characteristic of an environment of the field device.
8. The field device of claim 1, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs also includes relative changes in an environment of the field device.
9. The field device of claim 2, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes an indication of exposure of the field device to extremes in process variables.
10. The field device of claim 2, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes a diagnostic of electronics of the field device.
11. The field device of claim 2, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes sensor drift.
12. The field device of claim 1, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes a loop diagnostic input.
13. The field device of claim 12, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes field device shunt current.
14. The field device of claim 12, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes process loop current.
15. The field device of claim 12, wherein the at least one of the diagnostic inputs includes field device terminal voltage.
16. The field device of claim 1, wherein the at least one of the service-related recommendation output is transmitted over a process control loop.
17. The field device of claim 16, wherein the at least one service-related recommendation output is transmitted using enhanced Electronic device Description Language technology.
18. The field device of claim 1, wherein one of the plurality of diagnostic algorithms comprises a field device diagnostic algorithm.
19. The field device of claim 1, wherein one of the plurality of diagnostic algorithms comprises a loop diagnostic algorithm.
20. The field device of claim 1, wherein one of the plurality of diagnostic algorithms comprises an impulse line diagnostic algorithm.
21. The field device of claim 1, wherein the prediction algorithm is implemented using a polynomial curve fit.
22. The field device of claim 1, wherein the prediction algorithm is implemented using a neural network.
23. The field device of claim 1, wherein the prediction algorithm is implemented using rules.
24. The field device of claim 1, wherein the prediction algorithm is implemented using fuzzy logic.
25. The field device of claim 1, wherein the health indication degradation curve is implemented using a mathematical model.

Field devices are used in industries to control or monitor operation of a process such as an oil refinery. A field device, such as a transmitter, is typically part of a process control or monitoring loop and is located in the field to measure and transmit a process variable such as pressure, flow or temperature, for example, to control room equipment. A field device such as a valve controller can also be part of the process control loop and controls position of a valve based upon a control signal received over the process control loop, or generated internally. Other types of controllers control electric motors or solenoids, for example. The control room equipment is also part of the process control loop such that an operator or computer in the control room is capable of monitoring the process based upon process variables received from transmitters in the field and responsively controlling the process by sending control signals to the appropriate control devices. Another field device which may be part of a process control loop is a portable communicator which is capable of monitoring and transmitting process signals on the process control loop. Typically, such devices are used to configure devices which form the process control loop.

With the advent of low-power microprocessors, field devices have undergone significant changes. Years ago, a field device would simply measure a given process variable, such as temperature, and generate an analog indication in the form of a current varying between 4 and 20 (mA) to indicate the measured temperature. Currently, many field devices employ digital communication technology as well as more sophisticated control and communication techniques. Field devices often employ low-power electronics because in many installations they are still required to run on as little as 4 mA. This design requirement prohibits the use of a number of commercially available microprocessor circuits. However, even low-power microprocessors have allowed a vast array of functions for such field devices.

One new function that is enabled by microprocessor-based smart field devices is the generation of diagnostic information. Through adaptations of hardware, software, or both, today's smart field devices are able to assess the condition of process interface elements such as sensors or solenoids, assess their own circuitry, and/or even assess the relative health of the process control loop itself. Rosemount Inc., the Assignee of the present application, has contributed in this area. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,047,220; 5,828,567; 5,665,899; 6,017,143; 6,119,047; 5,956,663; 6,370,448; 6,519,546; 6,594,603; 6,556,145; 6,356,191; 6,601,005; 6,397,114; 6,505,517; 6,701,274; 6,754,601; 6,434,504; 6,472,710; 6,654,697; 6,539,267; 6,611,775; 6,615,149; 6,532,292; and 6,907,383.

The result of these significant developments in the area of diagnostics for microprocessor-based smart field devices is that a wealth of information is now available relative to numerous aspects of field devices in various process installations. However, considering that a given process installation may include tens, or even hundreds of such microprocessor-based field devices, an operator or technician could easily become overwhelmed by the sheer amount of diagnostic data provided during operation.

A method of processing diagnostic data in order to better utilize the finite maintenance resources of a process installation would increase the degree to which process installations could utilize the wealth of diagnostic information available today.

A field device resident algorithm receives one or more diagnostic inputs and generates actionable service information. The algorithm(s) can be changed or updated after the manufacture of the field device. The actionable service information can be displayed locally or sent over a process control loop. A prediction engine can be employed to determine a period within which such service should be completed.

FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram showing a process control loop including a transmitter, controller, hand-held communicator and control room.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a field device with which embodiments of the present invention can be practiced.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a number of algorithmic blocks in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a chart illustrating variation in a health indication over time, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an illustrative chart showing how a health indication can be predicted along a degradation curve.

Process variables are typically the primary variables which are being controlled or monitored in a process. As used herein, process variable means any variable which describes the condition of the process such as, for example, pressure, flow, temperature, product level, pH, turbidity, vibration, position, motor current or any other characteristic of the process. A diagnostic signal, as used herein, includes information related to operation of devices and elements in the process control loop or even the process itself. For example, diagnostic signals can include valve stem position, applied torque or force, actuator pressure, pressure of a pressurized gas used to actuate a valve, electrical voltage, current, power, resistance, capacitance, inductance, device temperature, stiction, friction, full on and off positions, travel, frequency, amplitude, spectrum and spectral components, stiffness, electric or magnetic field strength, duration, intensity, motion, electric motor back emf, motor current, loop related parameters (such as control loop resistance, voltage, or current), or any other parameter which may be detected or measured in the system.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a process control system 2 which includes process piping 4 which carries a process fluid and two wire process control loop 6 carrying loop current I. A transmitter 8, controller 10, which couples to a final control element in the loop such as an actuator, valve, a pump, motor or solenoid, communicator 12, and control room 14 are all part of process control loop 6. It is understood that loop 6 is shown in one configuration and any appropriate process control loop may be used such as a 4-20 mA loop, 2, 3 or 4 wire loop, multi-drop loop and a loop operating in accordance with the HART®, Fieldbus or other digital or analog communication protocol. Alternatively, the process control loop may employ various wireless communication techniques. In operation, transmitter 8 senses a process variable such as flow using sensor 16 and transmits the sensed process variable over loop 6. The process variable may be received by controller/valve actuator 10, communicator 12 and/or control room equipment 14. Controller 10 is shown coupled to valve 18 and is capable of controlling the process by adjusting valve 18 thereby changing the flow in pipe 4. Controller 10 receives a control input over loop 6 from, for example, control room 14, transmitter 8 or communicator 12 and responsively adjusts valve 18. In another embodiment, controller 10 internally generates the control signal based upon process signals received over loop 6. Communicator 12 may be the portable communicator shown in FIG. 1 or may be a permanently mounted process unit which monitors the process and performs computations. Field devices include, for example, transmitter 8 (such as a 3051S transmitter available from Rosemount Inc.), controller 10, communicator 12 and control room 14 shown in FIG. 1. Any of field devices 8, 10, 12 or 14 shown in FIG. 1 may include enhanced diagnostic signal processing in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one example of a field device 40 forming part of loop 6. Device 40 is shown generically and may comprise any field device such as transmitter 8, controller 10, or communicator 12. Control room equipment 14 may comprise, for example, a DCS system implemented with a PLC and controller 10 may also comprise a “smart” motor and pump. Field device 40 includes I/O circuitry 42 coupled to loop 6 at terminals 44. I/O circuitry has preselected input and output impedance known in the art to facilitate appropriate communication from and to device 40. Device 40 includes microprocessor 46, coupled to I/O circuitry 42, memory 48 coupled to microprocessor 46 and clock 50 coupled to microprocessor 46. Microprocessor 46 receives a process signal input 52. Block input is intended to signify input of any process signal such as a process variable, or a control signal and may be received from loop 6 using I/O circuitry 42 or may be generated internally within field device 40. Field device 40 is shown with a sensor input channel 54 and a control channel 56. Typically, a transmitter such as transmitter 8 will exclusively include sensor input channel 54 while a controller such as controller 10 will exclusively include a control channel 56. Other devices on loop 6 such as communicator 12 and control room equipment 14 may not include channels 54 and 56. It is understood that field device 40 may contain a plurality of channels to monitor a plurality of process variables and/or control a plurality of control elements as appropriate.

Sensor input 54 includes sensor 16, sensing a process variable and providing a sensor output to amplifier 58 which has an output which is digitized by analog to digital converter 60. Input 54 is typically used in transmitters such as transmitter 8. Compensation circuitry 62 compensates the digitized signal and provides a digitized process variable signal to microprocessor 46. In one embodiment, input 54 comprises a diagnostic channel which receives a diagnostic signal.

When field device 40 operates as a controller such as controller 8, device 40 includes control channel 56 having control element 18 such as a valve, for example. Control element 18 is coupled to microprocessor 46 through digital to analog converter 64, amplifier 66 and actuator 68. Digital to analog converter 64 digitizes a command output from microprocessor 46 which is amplified by amplifier 66. Actuator 68 controls the control element 18 based upon the output from amplifier 66. In one embodiment, actuator 68 is coupled directly to loop 6 and controls a source of pressurized gas (not shown) to position control element 18 in response to the current I flowing through loop 6. In one embodiment, controller 10 includes control channel 56 to control a control element and also includes sensor input channel 54 which provides a diagnostic signal such as valve stem position, force, torque, actuator pressure, pressure of a source of pressurized air, etc.

In one embodiment, I/O circuitry 42 provides a power output used to completely power other circuitry in process device 40 using power received from loop 6. Typically, field devices such as transmitter 8, or controller 10 are powered off the loop 6 while communicator 12 or control room 14 has a separate power source. As described above, process signal input 52 provides a process signal to microprocessor 46. The process signal may be a process variable from sensor 16, the control output provided to control element 18, a diagnostic signal sensed by sensor 16, or a control signal, process variable or diagnostic signal received over loop 6, or a process signal received or generated by some other means such as another I/O channel.

A user I/O circuit 76 is also connected to microprocessor 46 and provides communication between device 40 and a user. Typically, user I/O circuit 76 includes a display and audio for output and a keypad for input. Typically, communicator 12 and control room 14 includes I/O circuit 76 which allows a user to monitor and input process signals such as process variables, control signals (setpoints, calibration values, alarms, alarm conditions, etc.) along with rules, sensitivity parameters and trained values. A user may also use circuit 76 in communicator 12 or control room 14 to send and receive such process signals to transmitter 8 and controller 10 over loop 6. Further, such circuitry could be directly implemented in transmitter 8, controller 10 or any other process device 40.

Microprocessor 46 acts in accordance with instructions stored in memory 48. Various instructions stored within memory 48 allow microprocessor 46 to execute one or more algorithms within the field device in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. In general, the algorithms allow the field device to obtain one or more diagnostic inputs and generate a service-related recommendation output. Diagnostic information useful as input to the algorithm(s) can include any diagnostic information that has been currently developed, or will be developed. In contrast to types of diagnostic output that have been provided in the past, the field device service advisor recommends a particular service to be performed relative to the field device, components connected to the field device, to other field devices, or to the process control loop itself.

As can be imagined, if the tens or hundreds of field devices in a given process installation were providing various types of diagnostic information over process control loops, it could inundate an operator with such a vast amount of information that he or she may not be able to adequately determine what type or quantity of corrective action should be instituted with respect to a give piece or pattern of diagnostic information. Moreover, the sheer volume of diagnostic information itself could consume valuable communication bandwidth on the process control loop thereby reducing, or degrading the ability for process variable information to be communicated timely and effectively. Embodiments of the present invention preferably include a field device-resident algorithm that is able to take one or more inputs, including diagnostic inputs, and provide a service action recommendation. In this way, the field devices themselves can make a number of decisions about what types, quantity and timing of corrective service actions should be taken. Then, this singular message can be displayed by the field device, or communicated to a control room.

FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view of various service adviser algorithms in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. Preferably, each of algorithms 100, 110 and 120 are used by microprocessor 46 executing suitable instructions stored within memory 48. While algorithms 100, 110 and 120 are illustrated and described separately, such illustration is for clarity, and, in fact, all or any algorithms could be combined, as appropriate.

Field device algorithm 100 takes any suitable inputs related to the field device itself. Examples of suitable inputs include, but are not limited to, application input 122 (such as flow, level or pressure); process variable input 124; process variability input 126; field device environmental input 128; field device environmental change input 130; overpressure/overtemp input 132; field device electronics input 134; sensor drift 135; field device model number input 137 and field device tag input 139.

An example of process variable input 124 generally includes the value, either currently or historically, or both of the process variable of the field device. For example, if the field device is a pressure transmitter, then process variable 124 could be the actual process pressure value, history of values or any combination thereof.

Process variability input 126 is generally an indication of the variability of the process variable over a specified period. For example, process variability input may be a standard deviation calculation on an historical range of process variable values, or simply the difference between a local minima and local maxima of the process variable observed within a specified period of time.

Field device environmental input 128 includes any suitable parameter that may bear upon the operation of the field device itself. Examples of such parameters include the temperature of the field device itself, as measured by an internal temperature sensor, the relative humidity proximate the exterior of the field device, radio frequency interference that may be measured or detected by the field device, or any other external influences to the field device that can be measured, and that can bear upon the field device operation.

Input 130 is preferably based upon a mathematical operation on a history of values provided by input 128. For example, if input 128 includes a measurement of the temperature of the field device itself, input 130 can simply be an indication of whether the temperature of the field device is changed by a specific amount within a specific time.

Input 132 is preferably a measure of whether a field device is exposed to any relative extremes of the process variable. For example, if the field device is a pressure transmitter, input 132 is an indication of whether the pressure transmitter was subjected to an overpressure event, and if so, the duration and number of such overpressure events.

Input 134 can be generated by diagnostics run on or by the field device electronics itself. While not specifically illustrated, field device algorithm 100 can include other suitable diagnostic inputs relative to the field device. Moreover, as the state of field device diagnostics advances, it is contemplated that other types of field device diagnostic information could be provided to algorithm 100.

An example of sensor drift 135 includes an indication that the sensor, when subjected to a known characteristic, such as temperature for a temperature sensor, exhibits a reading that has changed over time. Sensor drift can occur as a sensor begins to wear, and some level of drift may be acceptable, while still indicating that service should be performed.

An example of field device model number input 137 includes data that is provided to algorithm 100 relative to the model number of the field device itself. Many field device manufacturers provide model numbers that may be parsed, at least to some degree, to provide a description of the field device. For example, a particular model code may describe the material of construction of the field device, the range of the field device, as well as any performance enhancements present in the field device. Thus, algorithm 100 may take such information into account during processing and modify the service message accordingly.

An example of field device tag input 139 is any data provided to algorithm 100 by a user, either locally or through remote means, that is an indication of a type of service performed by the field device. For example, pressure and differential pressure transmitters measure pressure, flow or level. The tagging convention may call for pressure applications to be tagged “PT”, for example PT-101. Flow application may be tagged “FT” and level applications tagged “LT.”

Field device algorithm 100 generally takes one or more of inputs 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 135, 137 and 139, and processes such inputs to generate actionable information regarding service on line 136. The specifics of algorithm 100 can be developed via empirical means through controlled testing, and/or can include specific rules relative to conditions of one or more inputs that generate actionable information regarding service. For example, testing may show that a combination of high process variability 126 and high sensor temperature requires service in the form of “inline zero of the field device every X hours.” This actionable service information can then be reported along line 136 to block 138 which may simply display or transmit the service information at block 140.

Loop algorithm 110 takes as inputs field device shunt current diagnostic 144; process loop current diagnostic input 146; field device terminal voltage 148; and potentially any output provided by field device algorithm 100, as illustrated in phantom at line 150.

An example of field device shunt current diagnostics 144 includes a measurement of the current consumed by field device 144 in its normal operations.

An example of process loop current diagnostics input 146 includes measurement of current able to be provided over the process communication loop to which the field device is connected.

An example of field device terminal voltage diagnostic input 148 includes measurement of the voltage across the field device terminals where the field device couples to the process communication loop.

As illustrated by the bi-directional arrows on phantom line 150, loop algorithm 110 may provide an output that is input to field device algorithm 100. Loop algorithm 110 takes one or more inputs 144, 146, 148 and 150, and generates actionable information regarding service of the loop along line 152.

Impulse line algorithm 120 generally receives plugged line diagnostic 154 but may receive any other information that may reasonably indicate a plugged impulse line condition. Impulse lines are conduits that convey pressure from an isolator diaphragm to a pressure sensor module. If such lines become plugged, or otherwise damaged, their ability to convey pressure from the isolation diaphragm to the sensor module may also become diminished. The ability to detect this condition is important. As illustrated in FIG. 3, impulse line algorithm line 120 may take an input from, or provide an output to, any of field device algorithm 100 and loop algorithm 110. Impulse line algorithm 120 provides actionable information regarding service of the impulse lines along line 156.

Examples of actionable service information provided by algorithms 100, 110 or 120 include: in-line zero field devices; blow down impulse lines; shop calibrate; check wiring/power supply; clear impulse lines; shop/factory calibrate; check capillary system; or any other suitable user-defined action that may be provided by the algorithms.

In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the algorithms themselves can be modified or updated as appropriate. Accordingly, as new relationships between field device diagnostic information and actionable service recommendations are correlated, such new correlations between the inputs and the actionable service outputs can be updated to the field devices. These updates can take numerous forms. The local ROM of the field device may be exchanged; updated file information may be transmitted to the field device over the process control loop; or a secondary communication interface, such as a wireless communication link with a field maintenance device.

Each of lines 136, 152 and 156 provides service information to module 138. Module 138 may combine the information into a signal message, and/or may engage predication engine 160 to determine when such actionable service information should be effected. For example, if field device algorithm 100 provides an indication that a particular field device service action is required, prediction engine 160 may be consulted to provide a time period within which such action should be effected.

Additionally, or in the alternative, module 138 may combine, or otherwise process, the information output over one or more of lines 136, 152 and 156 to generate an overall “health” indication or metric. This overall health indication can be displayed locally at the device, communicated over the process control loop, and/or used in conjunction with prediction engine 160 to calculate a point in the future when the health indication will reach a threshold beyond which corrective action is necessary.

Prediction engine 160 can include or utilize any known algorithmic and/or mathematical techniques to predict, based on historical data, programmatic data, empirical data, or any combination thereof, when a particular service action should be required. Examples of known techniques which can be employed in or by prediction engine 160 include the use of polynomial curve fits, neural networks, threshold circuitry, and/or fuzzy logic. Further detail regarding these techniques may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,701,274.

The polynomial curve fit technique employs empirical models or polynomial curve fitting in microprocessor 46. A polynomial-like equation which has a combination of any suitable input signals as the variable terms in the polynomial, together with constants stored in memory 48 can be used for computing a future time period within which a particular service action should be effected. If field device memory 48 is limited, the constants and/or equation may be sent over process communication loop 6.

Neural networks provide another useful technique for prediction engine 160. In particular, the neural network can be implemented with a multi-layer neural network. Although a number of training algorithms can be used to develop a neural network model for different goals, one embodiment includes using the known back propagation network (BPN) to develop neural network modules which will capture the non-linear relationship among a set of inputs and outputs. The number of inputs to the neural network may differ depending on the complexity of the system, and any one or combination of multiple inputs can be used.

Threshold circuitry can also be used to provide important functions for prediction engine 160. In particular, microprocessor 46 may consult with, or include such threshold circuitry. Rules resident within, or executed by microprocessor 46 may be implemented in either digital or analog circuitry. For example, the following is a sample if-then rule for spikes in pressure sensor output from a pressure sensor: if the number of spikes detected since commissioning multiplied by a value in memory 48 is greater than an upper threshold, then indicate that the pressure sensor must be replaced within X days. This is merely one illustrative example of threshold circuitry being used in conjunction with if-then rules to facilitate prediction engine 160.

Fuzzy logic is yet another technique that can be employed for prediction engine 160. In particular, using fuzzy logic, input data can be processed as a function of a membership function which is selected based upon a value of the input data. Such fuzzy logic techniques are well suited for inputs which fall in a non-linear or non-binary fashion.

Using prediction engine 160, the field device can generate actionable service information augmented with an interval within which the service action should be completed. Specifically, service notifications, such as blow down impulse line can be augmented to, “blow down impulse line within X hours.” These services notifications generally take the form of take “X” action within “Y” time. The time attribute can recite a specific incremental time in the future, such as “within six hours” can recite an interval such as “daily” or can recite a specific time in the future. It is also preferred that each field device be shipped with default settings in memory 48 such that the service adviser algorithm will generate an initial startup recommendation action such as “factory calibrate unit in 60 months.”

As the field device gains successful runtime, it is also contemplated that the prediction algorithm can be automatically modified such that the successful runtime is taken into account. Thus, a given field device that notes a diagnostic input that has a recommended service action may not recommend the service action as urgently if the field device has run successfully for ten years, in comparison to field device that is just starting its field operation.

FIG. 4 is a chart illustrating variation in a health indication over time, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Health indication 200 is compared with index 202 to determine whether the overall health necessitates corrective action. Index 202 can be established in any suitable manner, but is preferably established using High Accelerated Life Testing (HALT) with an index related thereto stored in each field device. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the health indication experiences two excursions beyond index 202. Such excursions may be caused by any of a variety of variables, or combinations thereof. Each field device preferably includes rules that cause the field device to report degradation if any such excursions are experienced, or the field device may report degradation after a set number or duration of excursions have occurred.

FIG. 5 is an illustrative chart showing how health indication 200 can be predicted along a degradation curve. Thus, an actual health indication observed at time to can be used to calculate that the health indication will reach a certain level at time t1. Thus, the actionable service information can include a time in the future when one or more actions should be performed. By calculating the degradation slope, even a first order mathematical model can be used to predict when the health indication will reach a certain threshold. Prediction engine 160 can use any suitable technique, or combination of techniques listed above, implemented in software, hardware, or any combination thereof.

Embodiments of the present invention generally provide a number of advantages in the field of diagnostics for smart microprocessor-based field devices. Embodiments generally provide a user with actionable information regarding service versus ambiguous raw alarm data. Further, users are provided with predictive information so that action may be taken before the process variable information is too bad to use for control. Further still, the various algorithms can be developed and refined empirically via a control test program. Further still, the algorithm is preferably resident in field device memory which reduces host dependency. Finally, the recommended maintenance action can be reported in any suitable manner, including via enhanced Electronic Device Description Language (EDDL) technology.

Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Schumacher, Mark S., Eryurek, Evren

Patent Priority Assignee Title
D756826, Mar 02 2014 Durex International Corp Electronic controller module
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3096434,
3404264,
3468164,
3590370,
3618592,
3688190,
3691842,
3701280,
3849637,
3855858,
3948098, Apr 24 1974 The Foxboro Company Vortex flow meter transmitter including piezo-electric sensor
3952759, Aug 14 1974 M & J Valve Company Liquid line break control system and method
3973184, Jan 27 1975 Leeds & Northrup Company Thermocouple circuit detector for simultaneous analog trend recording and analog to digital conversion
4058975, Dec 08 1975 General Electric Company Gas turbine temperature sensor validation apparatus and method
4083031, Jul 23 1970 The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy Acoustic presence detection method and apparatus
4099413, Jun 25 1976 Yokogawa Electric Corporation Thermal noise thermometer
4102199, Aug 26 1976 Megasystems, Inc. RTD measurement system
4122719, Jul 08 1977 Environmental Systems Corporation System for accurate measurement of temperature
4249164, May 14 1979 Flow meter
4250490, Jan 19 1979 Rosemount Inc. Two wire transmitter for converting a varying signal from a remote reactance sensor to a DC current signal
4255964, Nov 30 1978 The Garrett Corporation Fluid monitor
4279013, Oct 31 1979 GTE Valeron Corporation Machine process controller
4337516, Jun 26 1980 United Technologies Corporation Sensor fault detection by activity monitoring
4383443, Jan 15 1980 The Marconi Company Limited Liquid-level measurement
4390321, Oct 14 1980 AMERICAN DAVIDSON, INC , A CORP OF MICH Control apparatus and method for an oil-well pump assembly
4399824, Oct 05 1981 Air-Shields, Inc. Apparatus for detecting probe dislodgement
4417312, Jun 08 1981 Worcester Controls Corporation Electronic controller for valve actuators
4423634, Jul 08 1980 CGR Device for the activation of an apparatus for measuring acoustic emission by detection of background noise
4446741, Jun 01 1981 Prvni brnenska strojirna, narodni podnik Vibration transducer
4459858, Sep 18 1981 Hach Company Flow meter having an electromagnetic sensor probe
4463612, Dec 10 1981 ELSAG INTERNATIONAL B V , A CORP OF THE NETHERLANDS Electronic circuit using digital techniques for vortex shedding flowmeter signal processing
4517468, Apr 30 1984 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation Diagnostic system and method
4530234, Jun 30 1983 MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A CORP Method and system for measuring properties of fluids
4536753, Aug 02 1982 Del Norte Technology, Inc. Self monitoring intruder detecting system of noise-cancelling vibration detectors
4540468, Sep 26 1983 Board of Trustees of the University of Maine Method for determining the degree of completion and pulp yield
4571689, Oct 20 1982 The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Multiple thermocouple testing device
4630265, Sep 26 1984 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for selecting for use between data buses in a redundant bus communication system
4635214, Jun 30 1983 Fujitsu Limited Failure diagnostic processing system
4642782, Jul 31 1984 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Rule based diagnostic system with dynamic alteration capability
4644479, Jul 31 1984 Hughes Tool Company Diagnostic apparatus
4649515, Apr 30 1984 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CO LLC Methods and apparatus for system fault diagnosis and control
4668473, Apr 25 1983 ELSAG INTERNATIONAL B V , A CORP OF THE NETHERLANDS Control system for ethylene polymerization reactor
4686638, Nov 04 1983 Kabushiki Kaisha Kosumo Keiki Leakage inspection method with object type compensation
4696191, Jun 24 1986 The United States of America as represented by the United States Apparatus and method for void/particulate detection
4705212, Dec 27 1983 Engineering Measurements Co. Method and apparatus for managing steam systems
4707796, Oct 19 1983 Reliability and maintainability indicator
4720806, Mar 31 1984 BARMAG BARMER MASCHINENFABRIK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, A GERMAN CORP Method and apparaus for centrally collecting measured values
4736367, Dec 22 1986 SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION Smart control and sensor devices single wire bus multiplex system
4736763, Feb 26 1987 AIR FORCE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE Automatic device for the detection and shutoff of unwanted liquid flow in pipes
4758308, Mar 05 1985 System for monitoring contaminants with a detector in a paper pulp stream
4777585, Feb 06 1985 Hitachi, Ltd. Analogical inference method and apparatus for a control system
4818994, Oct 22 1987 Rosemount Inc.; ROSEMOUNT INC , A CORP OF MINNESOTA Transmitter with internal serial bus
4831564, Oct 22 1987 Suga Test Instruments Co., Ltd. Apparatus for estimating and displaying remainder of lifetime of xenon lamps
4833922, Jun 01 1987 Rosemount Inc.; ROSEMOUNT INC , 12001 TECHNOLOGY DR , EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344, A CORP MN Modular transmitter
4841286, Feb 08 1988 Honeywell Inc. Apparatus and method for detection of an open thermocouple in a process control network
4853693, May 09 1986 Air condition monitor unit for monitoring at least one variable of the ambient air
4866628, Dec 18 1987 International Business Machines Corp. Automated production dispatch system with feedback control
4873655, Aug 21 1987 Board of Regents, The University of Texas System Sensor conditioning method and apparatus
4907167, Sep 30 1987 PAVILION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Process control system with action logging
4924418, Feb 10 1988 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Universal monitor
4926364, Jul 25 1988 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Method and apparatus for determining weighted average of process variable
4934196, Jun 02 1989 Micro Motion, Inc. Coriolis mass flow rate meter having a substantially increased noise immunity
4939753, Feb 24 1989 FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATION Time synchronization of control networks
4964125, Aug 19 1988 HE HOLDINGS, INC , A DELAWARE CORP ; Raytheon Company Method and apparatus for diagnosing faults
4988990, Aug 11 1987 Rosemount Inc. Dual master implied token communication system
4992965, Apr 02 1987 paragon AG Circuit arrangement for the evaluation of a signal produced by a semiconductor gas sensor
5005142, Jan 30 1987 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Smart sensor system for diagnostic monitoring
5025344, Nov 30 1988 Carnegie Mellon University Built-in current testing of integrated circuits
5043862, Apr 07 1988 Hitachi, Ltd. Method and apparatus of automatically setting PID constants
5047990, Jun 01 1990 The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy Underwater acoustic data acquisition system
5053815, Apr 09 1990 Eastman Kodak Company Reproduction apparatus having real time statistical process control
5057774, Jan 10 1989 NXP B V Apparatus for measuring the quiescent current of an integrated monolithic digital circuit
5067099, Nov 03 1988 DIO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC Methods and apparatus for monitoring system performance
5081598, Feb 21 1989 SIEMENS POWER GENERATION, INC Method for associating text in automatic diagnostic system to produce recommended actions automatically
5089979, Feb 08 1989 FLEET NATIONAL BANK, AS AGENT Apparatus for digital calibration of detachable transducers
5089984, May 15 1989 ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, INC Adaptive alarm controller changes multiple inputs to industrial controller in order for state word to conform with stored state word
5094109, Dec 06 1990 Rosemount Inc.; ROSEMOUNT INC , A CORP OF MN Pressure transmitter with stress isolation depression
5098197, Jan 30 1989 The United States of America as represented by the United States Optical Johnson noise thermometry
5099436, Nov 03 1988 DIO TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC Methods and apparatus for performing system fault diagnosis
5103409, Jan 09 1989 Hitachi, Ltd. Field measuring instrument and its abnormality managing method
5111531, Jan 08 1990 AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC A CORPORATION OF DE Process control using neural network
5121467, Aug 03 1990 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Neural network/expert system process control system and method
5122794, Aug 11 1987 Rosemount Inc. Dual master implied token communication system
5122976, Mar 12 1990 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation Method and apparatus for remotely controlling sensor processing algorithms to expert sensor diagnoses
5130936, Sep 14 1990 WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Method and apparatus for diagnostic testing including a neural network for determining testing sufficiency
5134574, Feb 27 1990 INVENSYS SYSTEMS INC FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE FOXBORO COMPANY ; Invensys Systems, Inc Performance control apparatus and method in a processing plant
5137370, Mar 25 1991 Delta M Corporation Thermoresistive sensor system
5142612, Aug 03 1990 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Computer neural network supervisory process control system and method
5143452, Feb 04 1991 Rockwell International Corporation System for interfacing a single sensor unit with multiple data processing modules
5148378, Nov 18 1988 OMRON CORPORATION, 10, TSUCHIDO-CHO, HANAZONO, UKYO-KU, KYOTO-SHI KYOTO-FU, JAPAN Sensor controller system
5150289, Jul 30 1990 INVENSYS SYSTEMS INC FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE FOXBORO COMPANY Method and apparatus for process control
5167009, Aug 03 1990 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC On-line process control neural network using data pointers
5175678, Aug 15 1990 ELSAG INTERNATIONAL B V Method and procedure for neural control of dynamic processes
5189624, Sep 29 1989 General Electric Company Intelligent machining workstation operating logic
5193143, Jan 12 1988 Honeywell Inc. Problem state monitoring
5197114, Aug 03 1990 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Computer neural network regulatory process control system and method
5197328, Aug 25 1988 Fisher Controls International LLC Diagnostic apparatus and method for fluid control valves
5212765, Aug 03 1990 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC On-line training neural network system for process control
5214582, Jan 30 1991 Snap-On Tools Company Interactive diagnostic system for an automotive vehicle, and method
5216226, Mar 04 1991 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for preventing and predicting deterioration of insulation in an electric equipment
5216612, Jul 16 1990 R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY Intelligent computer integrated maintenance system and method
5224203, Aug 03 1990 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC On-line process control neural network using data pointers
5228780, Oct 30 1992 Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Dual-mode self-validating resistance/Johnson noise thermometer system
5235527, Feb 09 1990 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Method for diagnosing abnormality of sensor
5265031, Nov 26 1990 PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC Diagnostic gas monitoring process utilizing an expert system
5265222, Nov 27 1989 Hitachi, Ltd. Symbolization apparatus and process control system and control support system using the same apparatus
5267241, Apr 04 1990 Avasem Corporation Error correction code dynamic range control system
5269311, Aug 29 1989 HOSPIRA, INC Method for compensating errors in a pressure transducer
5274572, Dec 02 1987 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for knowledge-based signal monitoring and analysis
5282131, Jan 21 1992 BROWN AND ROOT INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC Control system for controlling a pulp washing system using a neural network controller
5282261, Aug 03 1990 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Neural network process measurement and control
5293585, Aug 31 1989 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Industrial expert system
5303181, Nov 08 1985 Harris Corporation Programmable chip enable logic function
5305230, Nov 22 1989 Hitachi, Ltd. Process control system and power plant process control system
5311421, Dec 08 1989 Hitachi, Ltd. Process control method and system for performing control of a controlled system by use of a neural network
5317520, Jul 01 1991 Moore Industries International Inc. Computerized remote resistance measurement system with fault detection
5327357, Dec 03 1991 PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC Method of decarburizing molten metal in the refining of steel using neural networks
5333240, Apr 14 1989 Hitachi, LTD Neural network state diagnostic system for equipment
5340271, Aug 18 1990 Rolls-Royce plc Flow control method and means
5347843, Sep 23 1992 KORR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC Differential pressure flowmeter with enhanced signal processing for respiratory flow measurement
5349541, Jan 23 1992 Electric Power Research Institute Method and apparatus utilizing neural networks to predict a specified signal value within a multi-element system
5351199, Jun 26 1989 BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT Programmable water treatment controller for progressive flow systems
5357449, Apr 26 1991 Texas Instruments Incorporated Combining estimates using fuzzy sets
5361628, Aug 02 1993 FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MICHIGAN CORPORATION System and method for processing test measurements collected from an internal combustion engine for diagnostic purposes
5365423, Jan 08 1992 Rockwell International Corporation Control system for distributed sensors and actuators
5365787, Oct 02 1991 Monitoring Technology Corp. Noninvasive method and apparatus for determining resonance information for rotating machinery components and for anticipating component failure from changes therein
5367612, Oct 30 1990 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, A CORP OF DE Neurocontrolled adaptive process control system
5369674, Jan 23 1991 Hitachi, Ltd. Plant diagnosis apparatus and method
5384699, Aug 24 1992 ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES, INC Preventive maintenance system for the photomultiplier detector blocks of pet scanners
5386373, Aug 05 1993 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Virtual continuous emission monitoring system with sensor validation
5388465, Nov 17 1992 Yamatake Corporation Electromagnetic flowmeter
5392293, Feb 26 1993 AT&T Corp. Built-in current sensor for IDDQ testing
5394341, Mar 25 1993 FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MICHIGAN CORPORATION Apparatus for detecting the failure of a sensor
5394543, Feb 05 1991 Storage Technology Corporation Knowledge based machine initiated maintenance system
5404064, Sep 02 1993 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY Low-frequency electrostrictive ceramic plate voltage sensor
5408406, Oct 07 1993 Honeywell INC Neural net based disturbance predictor for model predictive control
5408586, Aug 03 1990 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Historical database training method for neural networks
5410495, Jul 20 1993 Texas Instruments Incorporated Apparatus, systems, and methods for diagnosing anomalous mass flow controller operation
5414645, Oct 25 1991 Mazda Motor Corporation Method of fault diagnosis in an apparatus having sensors
5419197, Jun 02 1992 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Monitoring diagnostic apparatus using neural network
5430642, Jun 04 1990 Hitachi, LTD Control device for controlling a controlled apparatus, and a control method therefor
5434774, Mar 02 1994 Fisher Controls International LLC Interface apparatus for two-wire communication in process control loops
5436705, Apr 18 1994 Xerox Corporation Adaptive process controller for electrophotographic printing
5440478, Feb 22 1994 Mercer Forge Company Process control method for improving manufacturing operations
5442639, Oct 12 1993 SHIP STAR ASSOCIATES, INC Method and apparatus for monitoring a communications network
5444820, Dec 09 1993 MarketSpan Corporation Adaptive system and method for predicting response times in a service environment
5467355, Apr 13 1992 Mita Industrial Co., Ltd. Image forming apparatus provided with self-diagnosis system
5469070, Oct 16 1992 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL INC Circuit for measuring source resistance of a sensor
5469156, Jul 04 1989 Hitachi, Ltd. Field sensor communication system
5469735, Dec 09 1993 Hitachi, LTD Self-diagnosing apparatus and method for determining occurence of failure in inner cylinder pressure responsive sensor applicable to engine combustion detecting/controlling system
5469749, Sep 20 1991 Hitachi, Ltd. Multiple-function fluid measuring and transmitting apparatus
5481199, Sep 24 1993 Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration System for improving measurement accuracy of transducer by measuring transducer temperature and resistance change using thermoelectric voltages
5481200, Sep 15 1993 Rosemount Inc Field transmitter built-in test equipment
5483387, Jul 22 1994 Honeywell, Inc.; Honeywell INC High pass optical filter
5485753, Dec 13 1991 Honeywell Inc. Piezoresistive silicon pressure sensor implementing long diaphragms with large aspect ratios
5486996, Jan 22 1993 Honeywell Inc. Parameterized neurocontrollers
5488697, Jan 12 1988 Honeywell Inc. Problem state monitoring system
5489831, Sep 16 1993 Honeywell INC Pulse width modulating motor controller
5495769, Sep 07 1993 Rosemount Inc. Multivariable transmitter
5510779,
5511004, Jun 03 1992 Thomson-CSF Diagnostic method for an evolutionary process
5526293, Dec 17 1993 Texas Instruments Inc. System and method for controlling semiconductor wafer processing
5539638, Aug 05 1993 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Virtual emissions monitor for automobile
5548528, Aug 05 1993 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Virtual continuous emission monitoring system
5549137, Aug 25 1993 Fisher Controls International LLC Valve positioner with pressure feedback, dynamic correction and diagnostics
5555190, Jul 12 1995 Micro Motion, Inc. Method and apparatus for adaptive line enhancement in Coriolis mass flow meter measurement
5560246, Aug 22 1992 Claas Ohg Beschrankt Haftende Offene Handelsgesellschaft Mass flow rate measuring device with dual electrodes
5561599, Jun 14 1995 Honeywell, Inc Method of incorporating independent feedforward control in a multivariable predictive controller
5570034, Dec 29 1994 Intel Corporation Using hall effect to monitor current during IDDQ testing of CMOS integrated circuits
5570300, Apr 22 1992 INVENSYS SYSTEMS INC FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE FOXBORO COMPANY Self-validating sensors
5572420, Apr 03 1995 Honeywell Inc. Method of optimal controller design for multivariable predictive control utilizing range control
5572438, Jan 05 1995 ELUTIONS, INC Engery management and building automation system
5573032, Aug 25 1993 Fisher Controls International LLC Valve positioner with pressure feedback, dynamic correction and diagnostics
5578763, Jun 22 1995 The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York Electromagnetic flow meter
5591922, May 27 1994 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for measuring multiphase flows
5598521, Jun 16 1992 Honeywell Inc. Directly connected display of process control system in an open systems windows environment
5600148, Dec 30 1994 Honeywell, Inc Low power infrared scene projector array and method of manufacture
5600791, Sep 30 1992 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed device status in a clustered system environment
5608650, Aug 19 1994 MEDIQ PRN LIFE SUPPORT SERVICES, INC ; TRIAD MEDICAL, INC Systems and methods for testing pump flow rates
5623605, Aug 29 1994 THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Methods and systems for interprocess communication and inter-network data transfer
5629870, May 31 1994 SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC Method and apparatus for predicting electric induction machine failure during operation
5633809, Dec 22 1989 American Sigma, Inc. Multi-function flow monitoring apparatus with area velocity sensor capability
5637802, Feb 28 1995 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Capacitive pressure sensor for a pressure transmitted where electric field emanates substantially from back sides of plates
5640491, Apr 14 1992 AspenTech Corporation Control system using an adaptive neural network for target and path optimization for a multivariable, nonlinear process
5644240, Sep 30 1992 GAMBRO RENAL PRODUCTS, INC Differential conductivity hemodynamic monitor
5650943, Apr 10 1995 LEAK DETECTION SERVICES, INC Apparatus and method for testing for valve leaks by differential signature method
5654869, Dec 12 1994 NEC Tokin Corporation Chip-formed solid electrolytic capacitor without an anode lead projecting from anode member
5661668, May 25 1994 VMWARE, INC Apparatus and method for analyzing and correlating events in a system using a causality matrix
5665899, Feb 23 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Pressure sensor diagnostics in a process transmitter
5668322, Jun 13 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Apparatus for coupling a transmitter to process fluid having a sensor extension selectively positionable at a plurality of angles
5671335, May 23 1991 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Process optimization using a neural network
5672247, Mar 03 1995 UNION CAMP PATENT HOLDING, INC Control scheme for rapid pulp delignification and bleaching
5675504, Jan 23 1996 Universite Laval Method of predicting residual chlorine in water supply systems
5675724, May 03 1991 Storage Technology Corporation Knowledge based resource management
5680109, Jun 21 1996 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA, INC Impulse line blockage detector systems and methods
5682317, Aug 05 1993 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Virtual emissions monitor for automobile and associated control system
5682476, Oct 24 1994 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Distributed control system having central control providing operating power to wireless transceiver connected to industrial process control field device which providing redundant wireless access
5704011, Nov 01 1994 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA, INC Method and apparatus for providing multivariable nonlinear control
5705754, Oct 26 1995 Endress+Hauser Flowtec AG; Endress + Hauser Flowtec AG Coriolis-type mass flowmeter with a single measuring tube
5705978, Sep 29 1995 Rosemount Inc Process control transmitter
5708211, Jan 17 1997 Ohio University Flow regime determination and flow measurement in multiphase flow pipelines
5708585, Mar 20 1995 General Motors Corporation Combustible gas measurement
5710370, May 17 1996 DIETERICH STANDARD, INC , A CORP OF DELAWARE Method for calibrating a differential pressure fluid flow measuring system
5713668, Aug 23 1996 AccuTru International Corporation Self-verifying temperature sensor
5731522, Mar 14 1997 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Transmitter with isolation assembly for pressure sensor
5736649, Aug 23 1995 Tokico Ltd. Vortex flowmeter
5742845, Jun 22 1995 WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES INC System for extending present open network communication protocols to communicate with non-standard I/O devices directly coupled to an open network
5746511, Jan 03 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Temperature transmitter with on-line calibration using johnson noise
5747701, Jun 12 1996 RACINE FEDERATED, INC Ultrasonic vortex flowmeter having remote signal processing
5748883, Sep 30 1992 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed device status in a clustered system environment
5752008, May 28 1996 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc Real-time process control simulation method and apparatus
5754451, Feb 29 1996 L-3 Communications Corporation Preventative maintenance and diagonstic system
5764539, Jan 21 1994 Nestec S A Non-invasive system and method for a fluid flow monitoring system
5764891, Feb 15 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Process I/O to fieldbus interface circuit
5781024, Jul 26 1996 EASYDX, INC Instrument performance verification system
5781878, Jun 05 1995 Nippondenso Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for diagnosing degradation or malfunction of oxygen sensor
5790413, Mar 22 1993 Exxon Chemical Patents INC Plant parameter detection by monitoring of power spectral densities
5796006, Dec 22 1995 Naphtachimie Method and apparatus for measuring vibrations
5801689, Jan 22 1996 Extended Systems, Inc.; EXTENDED SYSTEMS INC Hypertext based remote graphic user interface control system
5805442, May 30 1996 SCHNEIDER AUTOMATION INC Distributed interface architecture for programmable industrial control systems
5817950, Jan 04 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Flow measurement compensation technique for use with an averaging pitot tube type primary element
5825664, Oct 02 1989 Rosemount Inc. Field-mounted control unit
5828567, Nov 07 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Diagnostics for resistance based transmitter
5854993, Dec 10 1996 Caterpillar Inc.; Caterpillar Inc Component machine testing using neural network processed vibration data analysis
5854994, Aug 23 1996 COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS, INC Vibration monitor and transmission system
5859964, Oct 25 1996 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. System and method for performing real time data acquisition, process modeling and fault detection of wafer fabrication processes
5869772, Jun 24 1997 SIERRA INSTRUMENTS, INC Vortex flowmeter including cantilevered vortex and vibration sensing beams
5887978, Aug 23 1996 AccuTru International Corporation Self-verifying temperature sensor
5900801, Feb 27 1998 Food Safety Solutions Corp. Integral master system for monitoring food service requirements for compliance at a plurality of food service establishments
5908990, Apr 19 1996 AURA ENVIRONMENTAL LTD , FORMERLY INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENT LIMITED Apparatus for measuring the velocity of a fluid flowing in a conduit
5920016, Jun 13 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Apparatus for coupling a transmitter to process fluid
5923557, Aug 01 1997 Agilent Technologies Inc Method and apparatus for providing a standard interface to process control devices that are adapted to differing field-bus protocols
5924086, Oct 10 1990 Honeywell Inc. Method for developing a neural network tool for process identification
5934371, Feb 09 1995 Baker Hughes Incorporated Pressure test method for permanent downhole wells and apparatus therefore
5936514, Sep 27 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Power supply input circuit for field instrument
5940013, Aug 28 1995 Anita Trotter-Cox Method and system for intelligence support and information presentation to aircraft crew and air traffic controllers on in-flight emergency situations
5940290, Dec 06 1995 Honeywell Inc. Method of predictive maintenance of a process control system having fluid movement
5956663, Nov 07 1996 ROSEMOUNT, INC Signal processing technique which separates signal components in a sensor for sensor diagnostics
5970430, Oct 04 1996 Fisher Controls International LLC Local device and process diagnostics in a process control network having distributed control functions
5995910, Aug 29 1997 Reliance Electric Industrial Company Method and system for synthesizing vibration data
6002952, Apr 14 1997 JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association Signal processing apparatus and method
6006338, Oct 04 1996 Rosemont Inc.; Rosemount Inc Process transmitter communication circuit
6014612, Oct 02 1997 Fisher Controls International LLC Remote diagnostics in a process control network having distributed control functions
6016706, Apr 23 1992 Hitachi, Ltd. Process state detector, semiconductor sensor and display device for displaying a process state used therefor
6017143, Mar 28 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Device in a process system for detecting events
6023399, Sep 24 1996 Hitachi, Ltd. Decentralized control system and shutdown control apparatus
6026352, Sep 03 1997 Fisher Controls International LLC Local device and process diagnostics in a process control network having distributed control functions
6046642, Sep 08 1998 SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD Amplifier with active bias compensation and method for adjusting quiescent current
6047220, Dec 31 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Device in a process system for validating a control signal from a field device
6047222, Oct 04 1996 Fisher Controls International LLC Process control network with redundant field devices and buses
6059254, Mar 27 1997 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Process instrument mount
6061603, Sep 10 1997 Schneider Automation Inc. System for remotely accessing an industrial control system over a commercial communications network
6072150, May 27 1998 Beamworks Ltd. Apparatus and method for in-line soldering
6094600, Feb 06 1996 FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC , A DE CORP System and method for managing a transaction database of records of changes to field device configurations
6104875, Dec 18 1997 Honeywell INC Method for field programming an industrial process transmitter
6112131, Feb 06 1998 Uster Technologies, AG Gin process control
6119047, Mar 28 1996 Rosemount Inc Transmitter with software for determining when to initiate diagnostics
6139180, Mar 27 1998 Vesuvius Crucible Company Method and system for testing the accuracy of a thermocouple probe used to measure the temperature of molten steel
6179964, Aug 30 1996 Voith Sulzer Papiermaschinen GmbH Method and control device for paper web profile control with plurality of sensors
6182501, Oct 21 1997 Cosmo Instruments, Co., Ltd. Leak test method and apparatus
6199018, Mar 04 1998 Emerson Electric Co Distributed diagnostic system
6209048, Feb 09 1996 RICOH COMPANY,LTD ,A CORP OF JAPAN HAVING A PLACE OF BUSINESS IN TOKYO,JAPAN AND RICOH CORP ; RICOH COMPANY, LTD A CORP OF JAPAN; Ricoh Corporation Peripheral with integrated HTTP server for remote access using URL's
6237424, Apr 25 1997 ELSTER WATER METERING LIMITED Electromagnetic flowmeter having low power consumption
6260004, Dec 31 1997 Innovation Management Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for diagnosing a pump system
6272438, Aug 05 1998 Micro Motion, Inc. Vibrating conduit parameter sensors, methods and computer program products for generating residual-flexibility-compensated mass flow estimates
6289735, Sep 29 1998 Reliance Electric Technologies, LLC Machine diagnostic system and method for vibration analysis
6298454, Feb 22 1999 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc Diagnostics in a process control system
6307483, Jun 07 1995 Rosemount Inc. Conversion circuit for process control system
6317701, Jun 17 1998 Metso Field Systems Oy Field device management system
6330005, Feb 23 1996 Visionael Corporation Communication protocol binding in a computer system for designing networks
6347252, Sep 26 1997 Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. Control and data transmission installation and a process for the transmission of safety-related data
6356191, Jun 17 1999 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Error compensation for a process fluid temperature transmitter
6360277, Jul 22 1998 CRYDOM, INC Addressable intelligent relay
6370448, Oct 13 1997 Rosemount Inc Communication technique for field devices in industrial processes
6377859, Oct 04 1996 Fisher Controls International LLC Maintenance interface device for a use in a process control network
6378364, Jan 13 2000 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Downhole densitometer
6396426, Oct 05 1998 Texas Instruments Incorporated Embedded mechanism offering real-time self failure detection for an analog to digital converter
6397114, Mar 28 1996 Rosemount Inc. Device in a process system for detecting events
6405099, Dec 25 1996 SMC Kabushiki Kaisha Automatic control system
6425038, Sep 28 1999 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Conversion of desk-top operating system for real-time control using installable interrupt service routines
6434504, Nov 07 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Resistance based process control device diagnostics
6447459, Apr 07 2000 KoKo IT, LLC Device and method for measuring lung performance
6449574, Nov 07 1996 Micro Motion, Inc.; Rosemount Inc. Resistance based process control device diagnostics
6473656, Jun 21 1996 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process automation system
6473710, Jul 01 1999 Rosemount Inc Low power two-wire self validating temperature transmitter
6480793, Oct 27 2000 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CO LLC Flow condition monitor
6492921, Mar 24 1999 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Device for clamping multiple signals
6493689, Dec 29 2000 GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC Neural net controller for noise and vibration reduction
6496814, Jul 19 2000 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for integrating spatial analysis, and scheduling to efficiently schedule and monitor infrastructure maintenance
6497222, Aug 05 1999 Continental Automotive GmbH Actuator configuration and method, in particular, for actuating an injection valve of an internal combustion engine
6505517, Jul 23 1999 Micro Motion, Inc High accuracy signal processing for magnetic flowmeter
6519546, Nov 07 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Auto correcting temperature transmitter with resistance based sensor
6530259, Nov 08 1993 FUGITIVE EMISSIONS DETECTION DEVICE, INC Fugitive emissions detection system and components thereof
6532392, Mar 28 1996 Rosemount Inc. Transmitter with software for determining when to initiate diagnostics
6539267, Mar 28 1996 Rosemount Inc. Device in a process system for determining statistical parameter
6546814, Mar 13 1999 TEXTRON IPMP L P Method and apparatus for estimating torque in rotating machinery
6556145, Sep 24 1999 Rosemount Inc Two-wire fluid temperature transmitter with thermocouple diagnostics
6561038, Jan 06 2000 Rosemount Inc. Sensor with fluid isolation barrier
6564268, Mar 17 1999 ROSEMOUNT, INC ; Rosemount Inc Fieldbus message queuing method and apparatus
6567006, Nov 19 1999 Itron, Inc Monitoring vibrations in a pipeline network
6594603, Oct 19 1998 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Resistive element diagnostics for process devices
6597997, Aug 01 2000 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Non-invasive pipe inspection system
6601005, Nov 07 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Process device diagnostics using process variable sensor signal
6611775, Dec 10 1998 Micro Motion, Inc Electrode leakage diagnostics in a magnetic flow meter
6615149, Dec 10 1998 Micro Motion, Inc Spectral diagnostics in a magnetic flow meter
6629059, May 14 2001 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Hand held diagnostic and communication device with automatic bus detection
6633782, Feb 22 1999 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Diagnostic expert in a process control system
6637267, Sep 30 1999 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Diagnostic system and method, especially for a valve
6654697, Mar 28 1996 Rosemount Inc. Flow measurement with diagnostics
6662120, Jun 19 2001 Endress + Hauser Flowtec AG Excitation circuits for coriolis mass flowmeters
6701274, Aug 27 1999 Rosemount Inc. Prediction of error magnitude in a pressure transmitter
6722185, Nov 08 1993 FUGITIVE EMISSIONS DETECTION DEVICE, INC Fugitive emissions detection system and components thereof
6727812, Jul 11 2000 Robert Bosch GmbH Method and device for error detection and diagnosis in a knock sensor
6735549, Mar 28 2001 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CO LLC Predictive maintenance display system
6738388, Sep 10 1998 FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATION Shadow function block interface for use in a process control network
6751560, Aug 01 2000 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Non-invasive pipeline inspection system
6754601, Nov 07 1996 Rosemount Inc.; Rosemount Inc Diagnostics for resistive elements of process devices
6758168, Nov 30 2000 Metso Automation Oy Method and apparatus for sootblowing recovery boiler
6772036, Aug 30 2001 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc Control system using process model
6785592, Jul 16 1999 NTT DATA SERVICES CORPORATION System and method for energy management
6859755, May 14 2001 Rosemount Inc Diagnostics for industrial process control and measurement systems
6889166, Dec 06 2001 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc; Rosemount Inc Intrinsically safe field maintenance tool
6892317, Dec 16 1999 LONGHORN HD LLC Systems and methods for failure prediction, diagnosis and remediation using data acquisition and feedback for a distributed electronic system
6904476, Apr 04 2003 Rosemount Inc. Transmitter with dual protocol interface
6907383, Mar 28 1996 Rosemount Inc. Flow diagnostic system
6915364, Jul 02 1999 FISHER ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATION Automatically downloaded link active schedule
6970003, Mar 05 2001 Rosemount Inc Electronics board life prediction of microprocessor-based transmitters
6976503, Apr 26 2002 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Diagnostic system and method for a valve
7013185, Dec 14 2000 IFAK INSTITUT FUER AUTOMATION UND KOMMUNIKATION E V MAGDEBURG Field device for automation systems
7018800, Aug 07 2003 Rosemount Inc. Process device with quiescent current diagnostics
7036381, Jun 25 2004 Rosemount Inc. High temperature pressure transmitter assembly
7040179, Dec 06 2002 Endress + Hauser Flowtec AG Process meter
7058542, Jul 07 2000 METSO FLOW CONTROL OY Wireless diagnostic system in industrial processes
7085610, Mar 28 1996 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc Root cause diagnostics
7099852, Sep 28 1999 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Detection of pump cavitation/blockage and seal failure via current signature analysis
7109883, Sep 06 2002 Rosemount Inc Low power physical layer for a bus in an industrial transmitter
7114516, Oct 14 2003 Takasago Engineering Co., Ltd. Leak-detecting check valve, and leak-detection alarm system that uses said check valve
7143007, Oct 17 2003 HYDRALIFT AMCLYDE, INC Equipment component monitoring and replacement management system
7171281, Jun 26 1998 Energizer Brands, LLC Control system and method therefor
7206646, Feb 22 1999 FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATION Method and apparatus for performing a function in a plant using process performance monitoring with process equipment monitoring and control
7254518, Mar 28 1996 Rosemount Inc Pressure transmitter with diagnostics
7258021, Jun 25 2004 Rosemount Inc. Process transmitter isolation assembly
7262693, Jun 28 2004 Rosemount Inc. Process field device with radio frequency communication
7435581, Nov 26 2003 NEW ENGLAND CONTROLS, INC Integrated bio-reactor monitor and control system
7502744, Oct 17 2000 Accenture Global Services Limited Performing predictive maintenance based on a predictive maintenance target
20020013629,
20020029808,
20020032544,
20020055790,
20020077711,
20020077782,
20020121910,
20020130846,
20020145568,
20020148644,
20020163427,
20020194547,
20030014536,
20030033040,
20030041135,
20030045962,
20030083953,
20030158803,
20040128034,
20040167750,
20040186927,
20040199361,
20040249583,
20050011278,
20050030185,
20050055137,
20050072239,
20050149570,
20050168343,
20050284237,
20060075009,
20060087402,
20060127183,
20060229931,
20060277000,
20070010968,
20070067725,
20070079250,
20070168057,
20070255520,
20070266020,
20100138066,
20100211443,
CA999950,
CN1346435,
EP122622,
EP413814,
EP487419,
EP512794,
EP594227,
EP624847,
EP644470,
EP807804,
EP825506,
EP827096,
EP838768,
EP965897,
EP1022626,
EP1058093,
FR2302514,
GB2310346,
GB2342453,
GB2347232,
JP2003503784,
JP2004021712,
JP2004034112,
JP2004186445,
JP2007507712,
JP205105,
JP2712625,
JP5122768,
JP5164781,
JP58129316,
JP59116811,
JP59163520,
JP59211196,
JP59211896,
JP60000507,
JP60131495,
JP60174915,
JP6076619,
JP6230915,
JP6248224,
JP6401914,
JP6472699,
JP8114638,
JP8136386,
JP8166309,
JP8247076,
JP9054611,
RE29383, Jan 31 1977 Process Systems, Inc. Digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system
WO41050,
WO55700,
WO70531,
WO102891,
WO177766,
WO227418,
WO2004044666,
WO2004048898,
WO2005033639,
WO2007100280,
WO9425933,
WO9611389,
WO9612993,
WO9639617,
WO9721157,
WO9725603,
WO9806024,
WO9813677,
WO9814855,
WO9820469,
WO9839718,
WO9919782,
///
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Sep 26 2006Rosemount Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Oct 31 2006SCHUMACHER, MARK S Rosemount IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0186320909 pdf
Nov 16 2006ERYUREK, EVRENRosemount IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0186320909 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jan 22 2018M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Dec 15 2021M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jul 22 20174 years fee payment window open
Jan 22 20186 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jul 22 2018patent expiry (for year 4)
Jul 22 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jul 22 20218 years fee payment window open
Jan 22 20226 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jul 22 2022patent expiry (for year 8)
Jul 22 20242 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jul 22 202512 years fee payment window open
Jan 22 20266 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jul 22 2026patent expiry (for year 12)
Jul 22 20282 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)