A hybrid absorber is disclosed for a closed absorption cycle apparatus. The hybrid absorber is comprised of a non-adiabatic section plus an adiabatic spray section in that order, with absorbent solution and vapor supplied sequentially to them. The spray section preferably also includes a non-adiabatic spray cooler. Coolant is supplied to the non-adiabatic absorber and the cooler either in parallel or in series, countercurrently to the absorbent.
|
14. A closed absorption cycle apparatus comprised of:
a. an absorber comprised of a non-adiabatic section followed by an adiabatic spray section, the latter including a spray pump and a spray cooler, and wherein said adiabatic spray section receives both vapor and liquid from said non-adiabatic section;
b. a desorber; and
c. a solution pump that circulates absorbent from said absorber to said desorber.
1. A hybrid absorber for a closed cycle absorption apparatus, comprised of:
a. a non-adiabatic absorption section;
b. an adiabatic spray absorption section that receives vapor and liquid from said non-adiabatic section; and
c. a recirculating liquid spray loop for said adiabatic section, comprised of a spray pump that is piped directly to said adiabatic section, and a spray cooler that is piped directly to said spray pump.
9. A hybrid absorber for a closed cycle absorption apparatus, comprised of:
a. a non-adiabatic absorption section;
b. an adiabatic spray absorption section that receives vapor and liquid from said non-adiabatic section;
c. a recirculating liquid spray loop for said adiabatic section, comprised of a spray pump and a cooler; and
d. a spray receiver for said solution that has separate suction pipes for the spray pump and the solution pump, plus a partition between the two suctions.
19. An absorption process for producing at least one of refrigeration, heat pumping, and power from a heat source, comprising:
a. desorbing vapor from an absorbent liquid with said heat source;
b. absorbing the vapor at lower pressure into the desorbed liquid in a multi-step process comprised of:
i. partially absorbing the vapor in a non-adiabatic absorber;
ii. routing the residual vapor and liquid to an adiabatic spray absorber;
iii. absorbing the residual vapor in an adiabatic spray absorber; and
iv. recirculating and cooling the spray liquid.
2. The apparatus according to
3. The apparatus according to
4. The apparatus according to
5. The apparatus according to
6. The apparatus according to
7. The apparatus according to
8. The apparatus according to
10. The apparatus according to
11. The apparatus according to
12. The apparatus according to
13. The apparatus according to
15. The apparatus according to
16. The apparatus according to
17. The apparatus according to
18. The apparatus according to
20. The process according to
|
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Closed absorption cycles use heat to produce at least one of refrigeration, heat pumping, and power. Especially with the ammonia-water type absorption cycle, but also generally with all types, the absorption step is recognized as being the most difficult of the four major heat and mass transfer steps of the cycle (absorption, desorption, condensation, and evaporation). With ammonia-water absorption, the water vapor absorbs preferentially into the absorbent solution relative to the ammonia vapor, leaving higher purity ammonia vapor at the liquid interface. This reduces the concentration driving force, thus impeding mass transfer of vapor into liquid. It is hypothesized that the cause of this is that the flux of vapor into the liquid has a much higher NH3 concentration than the liquid does, thus establishing a concentration gradient in the liquid, that feeds back to a concentration gradient in the vapor.
Ammonia-water absorption has conventionally been accomplished industrially by spraying absorbent solution over a tube bundle (or into the tubes) in the presence of the vapor to be absorbed, with cooling water on the other side of the tubes. An example of each is found in Bogart 1981 and in Malewski 1986. In residential-scale air-cooled units, the solution and vapor are apportioned into multiple parallel fin-tubes, with air blown across the fins. Pairs of tubes are joined after about two thirds of the absorption is accomplished, to keep the tube-side velocity in a desirable range for vapor-liquid mixing. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 3,580,001.
More recently, shell and coil absorbers have been used to improve the ammonia-water absorption rates. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,083 discloses cocurrent upflow of ammonia-water liquid and vapor on the shell side of this geometry, with countercurrent downflow of coolant on the tube side. With all three of the above approaches to absorption, the problem persists that as vapor absorption proceeds, the vapor volume decreases, the fluid velocities become lower and more quiescent, and hence absorption slows markedly. As a result large temperature driving forces become necessary, some of the cooling is wasted on subcooling the absorbent liquid, and large, costly absorbers are required.
With LiBr absorption (and other water vapor absorbents such as hydroxide mixtures), the vapor phase is single component (pure water vapor), since the absorbent is non-volatile. However absorption is still the limiting step, for a different reason=the very low pressure (deep vacuum). Trace amounts of inert gas will blanket the tubes at one hundredth of an atmosphere. LiBr absorption is frequently accomplished by spraying absorbent solution on cooled tube bundles, similar to some ammonia-water applications. This is referred to as falling film absorption. There has been some investigation reported on an alternative technique for LiBr absorption—adiabatic spray. Instead of spraying the solution onto a tube bundle, it is sprayed into a vacuum chamber, so the vapor is absorbed adiabatically. All of the heat of absorption goes into sensible heating of the solution, so it becomes quite warm. In order to limit the temperature rise to practical values, a very large volume spray is used, and the spray liquid is continuously recirculated by pumping through a liquid cooler and back to the spray nozzles. The advantage of this technique is that the heat transfer step enjoys very large transfer coefficients characteristic of liquid-liquid heat transfer. The disadvantage is that the recirculating liquid flowrate must be five to ten times larger than the flowrate of solution between absorber and desorber. This technique is described in Warnakulasuriya, F. and Worek, W. M., 2008 (Int J. Heat Mass Transf) vol 51; and in Summerer, F., et al, “Hydroxide Absorption Heat Pumps with Spray Absorber”, ASHRAE Paper AT-96-17-5, Transactions vol 102, Part 1, 1996. Also of interest are: Ryan, W. A., “Water Absorption in an Adiabatic Spray of Aqueous Lithium Bromide Solution”, AES Vol 31, ASME 1993; and Venegas, M., et al, “Spray Absorbers in Absorption Systems Using Lithium Nitrate-Ammonia Solution”, International Journal of Refrigeration, 2005, vol 28; and Gutierrez, G., et al, 2007, “Performance Analysis of an adiabatic absorption test rig fed with a low temperature heat source”, Tarragona.
Thus included among the problems of the prior art absorbers is that the recirculated spray adiabatic absorbers require exceptionally large pumping rates of absorbent solution; that LiBr falling film absorbers have pressure drop limitations and inert gas accumulation limitations; and that ammonia=water absorbers have performance limitations associated with low vapor velocities at the end of the absorption step, and also with buildup of excess ammonia concentration at the vapor-liquid interface under quiescent (low velocity) conditions.
The above problems are solved and additional useful objects are achieved by providing as the absorber in a closed absorption cycle a hybrid, multi-component absorber, comprised of a non-adiabatic section followed by an adiabatic spray section, wherein the spray section further includes a liquid recirculation pump and a liquid cooler. Both the vapor and the absorbent liquid are supplied sequentially to the two absorption sections in that order. The cooling supplied to the non-adiabatic section and the cooler can be either in parallel or series, and preferably countercurrent to the absorbent liquid. Further advantage is gained in some applications when the spray pump is also used for other functions, especially priming the solution pump, and when the spray receiver is partitioned such that the HP solution pump is supplied cooler, more concentrated solution (weaker in absorbing power) than the spray pump.
In
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3580001, | |||
5007240, | Dec 18 1987 | Babcock-Hitachi Kabushiki Kaisha | Hybrid Rankine cycle system |
5363668, | Mar 18 1992 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Absorption air conditioning system and cooling/heating changing-over method |
5572885, | Jun 06 1995 | Shrouded coiled crested tube diabatic mass exchanger | |
5592825, | Aug 30 1994 | Ebara Corporation | Absorption refrigeration machine |
6523357, | Dec 04 2001 | Takuma Co., Ltd. | Absorption refrigerator |
6679083, | Aug 02 2002 | Opposed slant tube diabatic sorber |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 26 2018 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 17 2018 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 12 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 12 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 12 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 12 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 12 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 12 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 12 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 12 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 12 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 12 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 12 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 12 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |