The present disclosure is directed to a flat wheel detector. The flat wheel detector may have a first sensor configured to be located adjacent a rail of a railroad track. The first sensor may be oriented at a first angle relative to a horizontal plane. The flat wheel detector may also have a second sensor configured to be located adjacent the rail. The second sensor may be oriented at a second angle relative to the horizontal plane. In addition, the flat wheel detector may have a controller in communication with the first and second sensors. The controller may be configured to receive signals from the first and second sensors. The controller may also be configured to detect a flat wheel on a railroad car based on the signals.
|
9. A method of detecting flat wheels on a railroad car travelling on a railroad track, the method comprising:
receiving a first signal from a first sensor located adjacent a rail of the railroad track, the first sensor being oriented at a first angle relative to a horizontal plane;
receiving a second signal from a second sensor located adjacent the rail, the second sensor being oriented at a second angle relative to the horizontal plane;
determining a speed of the railroad car travelling on the railroad track;
adjusting a threshold for a flat wheel condition based on the speed;
determining a parameter based on at least one of the first signal and the second signal; and
detecting a flat wheel on the railroad car when the parameter exceeds the threshold.
1. A flat wheel detector, comprising:
a first sensor configured to be located adjacent a rail of a railroad track, the first sensor being oriented at a first angle relative to a horizontal plane;
a second sensor configured to be located adjacent the rail, the second sensor being oriented at a second angle relative to the horizontal plane;
a speed detector located adjacent the railroad track and configured to generate a signal indicative of a speed of a railroad car travelling on the railroad track; and
a controller in communication with the first sensor, the second sensor, and the speed detector, the controller being configured to:
receive signals from the first sensor, the second sensor, and the speed detector;
adjust a threshold for a flat wheel condition based on the signal indicative of the speed; and
detect a flat wheel on the railroad car when a parameter based on at least one of the signals received from the first sensor and the second sensor exceeds the threshold.
15. A flat wheel detection system, comprising:
a first sensor configured to be located adjacent and outside a first rail of a railroad track, the first sensor being oriented at a first angle relative to a horizontal plane;
a second sensor configured to be located adjacent the first rail and inside the railroad track and oriented at a second angle relative to the horizontal plane;
a third sensor configured to be located adjacent a second rail of the railroad track, between the first rail and the second rail, and oriented at a third angle relative to the horizontal plane;
a fourth sensor configured to be located adjacent the second rail, outside the railroad track, and oriented at a fourth angle relative to the horizontal plane;
a speed detector configured to generate a signal indicative of a speed of a railroad car travelling on the railroad track;
an alarm; and
a controller in communication with the first, second, third, and fourth sensors, and the alarm, the controller being configured to:
determine a first parameter based on at least one of the signals received from the first and second sensors;
determine a second parameter based on at least one of the signals received from the third and fourth sensors;
determine a threshold based on the speed;
trigger the alarm and indicate a first flat wheel on the first rail when the first parameter exceeds the threshold; and
trigger the alarm and indicate a second flat wheel on the second rail when the second parameter exceeds the threshold.
2. The flat wheel detector of
3. The flat wheel detector of
4. The flat wheel detector of
5. The flat wheel detector of
6. The flat wheel detector of
7. The flat wheel detector of
8. The flat wheel detector of
10. The method of
selectively triggering an alarm when the parameter exceeds the threshold.
11. The method of
12. The method of
determining a first vertical component of the first signal; and
determining a second vertical component of the second signal;
determining the parameter based on the first vertical component and the second vertical component.
13. The method of
determining a duration for which the parameter exceeds the threshold; and
determining a width of a flat portion of a wheel based on the duration.
16. The flat wheel detection system of
the first sensor is oriented generally orthogonal to the second sensor; and
the third sensor is oriented generally orthogonal to the fourth sensor.
17. The flat wheel detection system of
18. The flat wheel detection system of
|
The present disclosure relates generally to a flat wheel detector and, more particularly, to a flat wheel detector with multiple sensors.
Railroad cars typically have one or more axles, each with a metallic wheel on either end. The wheels rest on a railroad track consisting of metallic rails attached to wooden or metallic ties spaced at regular intervals. The wheels rotate on the rails as the railroad car travels on the railroad track. When brakes are applied to the wheels, however, the wheels can stop rotating and instead slide on the rails before the railroad car slows down or comes to a complete stop.
Repeated sliding motion of the wheels on the rails can cause excessive wear on portions of the wheel in contact with the rails. Specifically, the wheels can develop one or more flattened portions as a result of the repeated sliding motion. When a wheel with one or more flattened portions rotates on the rails, the flattened portions repeatedly impact the rails with each rotation of the wheel, creating excessive vibrations and noise. The forces induced by the flat wheels can cause significant damage to wheel bearings, springs, and other parts of the railroad car. A severely flattened wheel can even cause the railroad car to derail. It is, therefore, important to detect the presence of flat wheels on a railroad car and initiate preventive maintenance before the flat wheels cause significant damage.
An exemplary method of detecting flat wheels is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,495 to Welles II et al. that issued on Apr. 28, 1998 (“the '495 patent”). Specifically, the '495 patent discloses a system for predicting railway hazards utilizing vibration sensors mounted on each respective rail of a railroad track. The vibration sensors detect the vibration of the railroad track caused by a railway vehicle moving along the railroad track. Each sensor is attached to one rail of the railroad track to detect movement of that rail. The sensing axis of each sensor in the '495 patent is oriented at a small angle of about 1° to 10° relative to a longitudinal axis of the rail. The angle of inclination allows each sensor to detect movement along both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis of each rail. The '495 patent also discloses a central processor adapted to detect a flat wheel on a moving railway vehicle by identifying frequency peaks, occurring at or near an expected frequency, in the signals received from the sensors. The '495 patent estimates the expected frequency by dividing a predetermined expected speed of the railway vehicle by the circumference of that vehicle's wheel.
Although the '495 patent discloses a method of detecting flat wheels, the method disclosed in the '495 patent relies on sensors directly attached to the rails. This requires that new sensors must be attached to the rails every time rails are replaced, making this method of flat wheel detection cumbersome and expensive. Moreover, the sensors of the '495 patent may not be sensitive enough to detect the early onset of flattening. A flat wheel on a railroad car is expected to generate vibrations primarily because of the vertical impact of a flat portion of the wheel on the rail. The sensors of the '495 patent, however, are nearly horizontal, making them less sensitive to smaller vertical impacts on the rails caused by relatively smaller flattened portions on a wheel. As a result, these sensors may not be able to detect an early onset of flattening on the wheels because wheels having relatively smaller flattened portions will produce relatively smaller vertical impacts on the rails. Moreover, because the '495 patent uses only one sensor per rail, the sensor may not detect the presence of more than one flat portion on the wheel.
The flat wheel detector of the present disclosure solves one or more of the problems set forth above and/or other problems in the art.
In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a flat wheel detector. The flat wheel detector may include a first sensor configured to be located adjacent a rail of a railroad track. The first sensor may be oriented at a first angle relative to a horizontal plane. The flat wheel detector may also include a second sensor configured to be located adjacent the rail. The second sensor may be oriented at a second angle relative to the horizontal plane. In addition, the flat wheel detector may include a controller in communication with the first sensor and the second sensor. The controller may be configured to receive signals from the first sensor and the second sensor. The controller may also be configured to detect a flat wheel on a railroad car based on the signals.
In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a method of detecting flat wheels on a railroad car. The method may include receiving a first signal from a first sensor located adjacent a rail of a railroad track, the first sensor being oriented at a first angle relative to a horizontal plane. The method may further include receiving a second signal from a second sensor located adjacent the rail, the second sensor being oriented at a second angle relative to the horizontal plane. The method may also include detecting a flat wheel on the railroad car based on at least one of the first and second signals.
Dragger 10 may be attached to first and second rails 14, 16 and may embody one or more flat wheel detectors 150, 160 for detecting flat wheels on a train, and a dragging equipment detector 155 for detecting equipment that may be hanging loosely below the train. Dragger 10 may also serve as a derailment detector for detecting whether the train has derailed. Although only a few of the functions of dragger 10 have been listed, dragger 10 may perform a number of other functions known in the art for detecting faults related to a train and railroad track 12.
Dragger 10 may include four paddles 42, 44, 46, 48 configured to be located adjacent first and second rails 14, 16 of railroad track 12. Specifically, dragger 10 may include a first paddle 42 configured to be located adjacent first rail 14. First paddle 42 may be configured to be located outside railroad track 12. Dragger 10 may also include a second paddle 44 configured to be located adjacent first rail 14. Second paddle 44 may be configured to be located between first and second rails 14, 16. Dragger 10 may further include a third paddle 46 configured to be located adjacent second rail 16. Like second paddle 44, third paddle 46 may also be configured to be located between first and second rails 14, 16. In addition, dragger 10 may include a fourth paddle 48 configured to be located adjacent second rail 16. Fourth paddle 48 may be configured to be located outside railroad track 12. Thus, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
When wheels 64 of railroad car 66 develop flat portions, these flat portions may repeatedly impact first and second rails 14, 16 of railroad track 12 as the wheels 64 rotate. Flat wheel detectors 150, 160 of dragger 10 may detect the presence of such flat portions on wheels 64. Railroad car 66 may also have a number of items attached to it. For example, railroad car may have a hose 82 attached to its underside. When hose 82 comes loose from its mounting, it may hang below railroad car 66, and may impact one or both of second and third paddles 44, 46 as railroad car 66 travels past dragger 10. Signals from second and third sensors 54, 56 mounted on second and third paddles 44, 46, respectively, may be used to detect the presence of such loose items. It is also contemplated that if railroad car 66 derails, wheels 64 or other portions of railroad car 66 may contact one or more of first, second, third, and fourth paddles 42, 44, 46, 48, and the signals from first, second, third, and fourth sensors 52, 54, 56, 58 may be used to detect that railroad car 66 has derailed.
First sensor 52 may be attached to one of first and second inclined plates 96, 98. As shown in
Although,
As shown in
Returning to
Although first and third sensors 52, 56 have been described above as being attached to first inclined plate 96, either or both of them may be attached to second inclined plate 98 of first and third paddles 42, 46, respectively. Similarly, although second and fourth sensors 54, 58 have been described as being attached to second inclined plate 98, either or both of them may be attached to first inclined plate 96 of second and fourth paddles 44,48 respectively. It is further contemplated that first, second, third, and fourth angles θ1, θ2, θ3, θ4 may be the same or different. It is also contemplated that each of first, second, third, and fourth paddles 42, 44, 46, 48 may have more than one sensor. Thus, for example, first paddle 42 may have a first sensor 52 attached to first inclined plate 96 and a second sensor 54 attached to second inclined plate 98. Second, third, and fourth paddles 44, 46, and 48 may have a similar two sensor construction as first paddle 42.
First and second paddles 42 and 44 may form first flat wheel detector 150. Paddles 42 and 44 may cooperate to help detect the presence of a flat wheel 64 on first rail 14. Third and fourth paddles 46 and 48 may form second flat wheel detector 160. Paddles 46 and 48 may cooperate to help detect the presence of a flat wheel 64 on second rail 16. In yet another exemplary embodiment, first flat wheel detector 150 may include fifth paddle 130 in addition to first and second paddles 42, 44 and signals from first, second, and fifth sensors, 52, 54, 132 may be used by controller 70 to detect a flat wheel on first rail 14. It is also contemplated that a sixth paddle having s sixth sensor oriented orthogonal to horizontal plane 30, similar to fifth paddle 130, may be included in second flat wheel detector 160.
Controller 70 may embody a single microprocessor or multiple microprocessors, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), digital signal processors (DSPs), etc. that include a means for controlling an operation of fault detection system 170 in response to signals received from the various sensors. Numerous commercially available microprocessors can be configured to perform the functions of controller 70. Various other known circuits may be associated with controller 70, including power supply circuitry, signal-conditioning circuitry, actuator driver circuitry (i.e., circuitry powering solenoids, motors, or piezo actuators), communication circuitry, and other appropriate circuitry.
First, second, third, fourth, and fifth sensors 52, 54, 56, 58, and 132 may be any force sensors commonly known in the art, such as, for example, a load link, a strain gauge, a transducer, or a load cell, single axis or tri axis accelerometer. Speed detector 74 may be configured to generate a signal indicative of a speed of a rotating component of railroad car 66 (e.g., wheels 64) that could subsequently be used to determine the travel speed of railroad car 66, or alternatively be configured to directly detect the travel speed (e.g., speed detector 74 may be a Doppler, radar, or laser type sensor). In another embodiment, speed detector 74 may include a pair of wheel gate transducers 76, 78 (see
Alarms 172, 174, 176, 178 may be located within a control cabin (not shown) of a train including railroad car 66. Alternatively or additionally, alarms 172, 174, 176, 178 may be located at a central location for monitoring the status of more than one train and railroad track 12, for example, in a central control room or maintenance department. Alarms 172, 174, 176, 178 may be audible, visual, or both.
The disclosed dragger and fault detection system may be used to detect many different fault conditions related to a railroad car travelling on a railroad track. For example, the dragger and the fault detection system may be used to detect flat wheels on a railroad car. The dragger may also be used to detect the presence of objects dragging below a railroad car. In addition, the dragger may be used to determine if the railroad car has derailed. Operation of dragger 10 for detecting flat wheels will be discussed next.
During operation of dragger 10, signals from first, second, third, and fourth sensors 52, 54, 56, and 56 may be transmitted to controller 70. Controller 70 may use signals from first and second sensors 52 and 54, located adjacent first rail 14, to determine whether a wheel 64 travelling on first rail 14 has a flattened portion. Similarly controller 70 may use signals from third and fourth sensors 56 and 58, located adjacent second rail 16, to determine whether a wheel 64 travelling on second rail 16 has a flattened portion.
In one exemplary embodiment first and second sensors 52, 54 may be configured to be spaced apart from each other by a predetermined distance along a length of railroad track 12. Separating first and second sensors 52, 54 in this manner may allow first flat wheel detector 150 to detect the presence of more than one flat portion on a wheel. For example, consider a wheel 64 having two flat portions angularly spaced on the circumference of wheel 64. When the first flat portion impacts first rail 14 near first sensor 52, first sensor 52 may generate a strong signal in response to the impact. Second sensor 54, which may be spaced apart from first sensor 52 may, however, generate a relatively weaker signal in response to the impact of the first flat portion. As the wheel rotates and travels from near first sensor 52 towards second sensor 54, the second flat portion may impact first rail 14. The strength of the signal generated by first and second sensors 52, 54 may depend on the relative distance of wheel 64 from first and second sensors 52, 54. Differences in the signals generated by the first and second sensors 52, 54 may, thus, be used to detect the presence of more than one flat portion on wheel 64.
Controller 70 may receive signals from speed detector 74 that indicate a speed of railroad car 66 travelling on railroad track 12 (Step 182). Controller 70 may determine a parameter based on at least one of the signals received from first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, 132 (Step 184). For example, controller 70 may determine a parameter for each of the signals received from the first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, 132. Alternatively, controller 70 may determine the parameter as a maximum from among the parameters for the signals received from the first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, 132. As another alternative, controller 70 may determine vertical components of the signals received from first and second sensors 52, 54 before determining the parameter. As yet another alternative, controller 70 may superimpose, combine, or merge scaled or un-scaled signals from the first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, and 132 before generating a parameter from the combined signal. Controller 70 may use the signals generated by first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, and 132 directly to generate the parameter. For example, controller may process these signals in a time domain. Alternatively, controller 70 may transform the signals generated by first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, and 132 into a frequency domain before processing them to generate a parameter. Controller 70 may also perform other manipulations of the signals generated by first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, and 132, for example, by performing fast fourier transforms or any other appropriate signal processing techniques known in the art. In one exemplary embodiment controller 70 may select an amplitude of the signals received from the first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, 132 as the parameter. One skilled in the art would recognize, however, that the parameter may be a measure of energy, a power spectral density, or any other appropriate parameter known in the art that represents the intensity of the impact of a flattened portion of wheel 64 on first rail 14.
Controller 70 may adjust a threshold based on the speed of railroad car 66 (Step 186). For example, at slow speeds, the impacts of a flat portion of wheel 64 may create forces of relatively lower magnitude. In contrast, at higher speeds, the forces generated may be of a relatively higher magnitude because of the more frequent impact of the flat portions on first rail 14 at higher speeds of railroad car 66. At relatively lower speeds of railroad car 66, a parameter determined from the signals received from first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, 132 may have a small magnitude. If the threshold is set too high, the parameter may, therefore, not exceed the threshold and flat wheel detector 150 may not be able to detect a flat wheel when railroad car 66 is travelling at a low speed. In contrast, if the threshold is set too low, slight vibrations in first rail 14 may cause controller 70 to trigger first flat wheel alarm 172. Thus, a lower threshold may be necessary when a speed of the railroad car 66 is low and a higher threshold may be necessary when the speed of the railroad car 66 is high. Controller 70 may adjust the threshold to have a lower value at low speeds and higher value at high speeds based on a speed of railroad car 66.
Controller 70 may compare the parameter with the threshold to determine if the parameter exceeds the threshold (Step 188). Controller 70 may also determine a width of a flat portion of wheel 64 by determining a duration for which the parameter remains above the threshold. Thus for example, at any given speed, as railroad car 66 passes dragger 10, a parameter corresponding to one or more of the signals received from the first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, 132 may be expected to exceed the threshold for a longer duration when the width of a flat portion on wheel 64 is larger.
When controller 70 determines that the parameter exceeds the threshold (Step 188: YES), controller 70 may trigger first flat wheel alarm 172 (Step 190). After triggering first flat wheel alarm 172, controller 70 may return to Step 180 and continue to monitor and receive signals from first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, and 132 (Step 180). When controller 70 determines that the parameter does not exceed the threshold (step 188: NO), controller 70 may also return to step 180 to monitor and receive new signals from first, second, and fifth sensors 52, 54, 132. Although the above discussion focuses on operation of first flat wheel detector 150, second flat wheel detector 160 may operate in a similar manner.
Operation of dragger 10 for detecting a variety of fault conditions based on signals received from specific sensors will be discussed next. As illustrated in
Controller 70 may receive signals from speed detector 74 that indicate a speed of railroad car 66 travelling on railroad track 12 (Step 202). Controller 70 may select signals from the signals received from first, second, third, and fourth 52, 54, 56, 58 (Step 204). Controller 70 may determine a parameter based on the selected signals (Step 206). Controller 70 may determine the parameter using techniques similar to those discussed above for first flat wheel detector 150. Further, because loose objects are likely to produce horizontal impacts on second and third paddles 44, 46, controller 70 may determine horizontal components of the signals received from second and third sensors 54, 56. Controller 70 may use the horizontal components of the signals received from first and second sensors 52, 54 in generating the parameter.
Controller 70 may adjust the threshold based on a speed of railroad car 66 (Step 208). For example, when railroad car 66 is travelling at a slow speed, hose 82 may impact second or third paddles 44, 46 with a smaller amount of force compared to when railroad car 66 may be travelling at a relatively higher speed. At relatively lower speeds of railroad car 66, a parameter determined from the signals received from second and third sensors 54, 56 may be small because the force of the impact on second and third paddles 44, 46 may be small. If the threshold is set too high, the parameter may not exceed the threshold and dragging equipment detector 155 may not be able to detect dragging equipment when railroad car 66 is travelling at a low speed. In contrast, at relatively higher speeds of railroad car 66, a parameter determined from the signals received from second and third sensors 54, 56 may be large simply because of the vibrations induced in the sensors due to a fast moving railroad car 66. If the threshold is set too low, the parameter may exceed the threshold even without a loose object impacting second and third paddles 44, 46 causing dragging equipment detector 155 to trigger a false alarm. Thus, to detect impact of loose objects with second and third paddles 44, 46 at lower speeds, the threshold may be lowered. In contrast, a much higher threshold may be necessary to detect true impacts of objects with second and third paddles 44, 46 at higher speeds. Controller 70 may, therefore, increase the threshold when the speed of railroad car 66 is high and decrease the threshold when the speed of railroad car 66 is low.
Controller may compare the parameter to the threshold (Step 210). When the parameter exceeds the threshold (Step 210: YES), controller may select an alarm based on the signals selected in step 204 (Step 212). To simplify explanation of the disclosed method, signals from first, second, third, and fourth sensors 52, 54, 56, and 58 will be referred to as 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively in the following discussion. Controller 70 may select the first flat wheel alarm 172 when the selected signals consist of signals 1 and 2 (Step 212). Controller 70 may select the second flat wheel alarm 174 when the selected signals consist of signals 3 and 4 (Step 212). Controller 70 may select the dragging equipment alarm 176 when the selected signals consist of signals 2 and 3 (Step 212). Controller 70 may select the derailment alarm 178 when the selected signals consist of signals 1 and 3 or signals 2 and 4 (Step 212). Controller 70 may trigger the selected alarm (Step 214). Although separate alarms 172, 174, 176, and 178 have been discussed above, controller 70 may instead select a single alarm 172 and direct alarm 172 to indicate or display the type of fault based on the selected signals. For example, alarm 172 may indicate a flat wheel fault if signals 1, 2 or 3, 4 have been selected. Similarly, alarm 172 may indicate a dragging equipment fault if signals 2, 3 have been selected. And, alarm 172 may indicate a derailment fault if signals 1, 3 or 2, 4 have been selected.
After triggering the selected alarm, controller 70 may return to step 200 to continue to monitor and receive signals from first, second, third, and fourth sensors 52, 54, 56, and 58. When the parameter does not exceed the threshold (Step 210: NO), controller may also return to step 200 to continue to monitor and receive signals from first, second, third, and fourth sensors 52, 54, 56, and 58. Although certain specific combinations of sensors have been described here for detection of various fault conditions, one skilled in the art would recognize that the fault detection system 170 of the present disclosure is not so limited and that other combinations of sensors may be used to detect the above described fault conditions or other fault conditions.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the disclosed flat wheel detector without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Other embodiments of the flat wheel detector will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the flat wheel detector disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope of the disclosure being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents.
Bartonek, Mark Joseph, Arndt, Don
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10124819, | Aug 08 2016 | GE DIGITAL HOLDINGS LLC | Wheel deformity warning system |
10196078, | Nov 30 2015 | Progress Rail Locomotive Inc | Diagnostic system for a rail vehicle |
10322734, | Jan 19 2015 | TETRA TECH, INC | Sensor synchronization apparatus and method |
10349491, | Jan 19 2015 | TETRA TECH, INC | Light emission power control apparatus and method |
10362293, | Feb 20 2015 | TETRA TECH, INC | 3D track assessment system and method |
10384697, | Jan 19 2015 | TETRA TECH, INC | Protective shroud for enveloping light from a light emitter for mapping of a railway track |
10625760, | Jun 01 2018 | TETRA TECH, INC | Apparatus and method for calculating wooden crosstie plate cut measurements and rail seat abrasion measurements based on rail head height |
10728988, | Jan 19 2015 | TETRA TECH, INC | Light emission power control apparatus and method |
10730538, | Jun 01 2018 | TETRA TECH, INC | Apparatus and method for calculating plate cut and rail seat abrasion based on measurements only of rail head elevation and crosstie surface elevation |
10807623, | Jun 01 2018 | TETRA TECH, INC.; TETRA TECH, INC | Apparatus and method for gathering data from sensors oriented at an oblique angle relative to a railway track |
10870441, | Jun 01 2018 | TETRA TECH, INC | Apparatus and method for gathering data from sensors oriented at an oblique angle relative to a railway track |
10908291, | May 16 2019 | TETRA TECH, INC | System and method for generating and interpreting point clouds of a rail corridor along a survey path |
11169269, | May 16 2019 | TETRA TECH, INC | System and method for generating and interpreting point clouds of a rail corridor along a survey path |
11196981, | Feb 20 2015 | TETRA TECH, INC. | 3D track assessment apparatus and method |
11259007, | Feb 20 2015 | TETRA TECH, INC. | 3D track assessment method |
11305799, | Jun 01 2018 | TETRA TECH, INC. | Debris deflection and removal method for an apparatus and method for gathering data from sensors oriented at an oblique angle relative to a railway track |
11377130, | Jun 01 2018 | TETRA TECH, INC | Autonomous track assessment system |
11399172, | Feb 20 2015 | TETRA TECH, INC | 3D track assessment apparatus and method |
11560165, | Jun 01 2018 | TETRA TECH, INC. | Apparatus and method for gathering data from sensors oriented at an oblique angle relative to a railway track |
11673561, | Nov 05 2019 | Transportation IP Holdings, LLC | Vehicle control system |
11755965, | Apr 30 2019 | Transportation IP Holdings, LLC | Asset identification and tracking system |
11782160, | May 16 2019 | TETRA TECH, INC. | System and method for generating and interpreting point clouds of a rail corridor along a survey path |
11919551, | Jun 01 2018 | TETRA TECH, INC. | Apparatus and method for gathering data from sensors oriented at an oblique angle relative to a railway track |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2662973, | |||
2691722, | |||
2993988, | |||
3546448, | |||
3558875, | |||
3558876, | |||
4129276, | Jan 30 1978 | SASIB S P A | Technique for the detection of flat wheels on railroad cars by acoustical measuring means |
4379330, | Jan 14 1981 | BUSINESS ALLIANCE CAPITAL CORP | Railroad car wheel detector |
4696446, | Apr 07 1983 | Shinko Electric Co. Ltd.; Japanese National Railways | System for detecting flat portion of peripheral surface of vehicle wheel |
4702104, | Aug 14 1984 | Method and device for detecting wheels with deformed treads in railroad vehicles | |
4895324, | Jan 12 1989 | Reusable derailment detection and signaling device | |
5150618, | Jul 06 1989 | BUSINESS ALLIANCE CAPITAL CORP | Acoustic bearing defect detector |
5433111, | May 05 1994 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and method for detecting defective conditions in railway vehicle wheels and railtracks |
5462244, | Sep 25 1992 | N V NEDERLANDSE SPOORWEGEN | System for detecting trains |
5743495, | Feb 12 1997 | Progress Rail Services Corporation | System for detecting broken rails and flat wheels in the presence of trains |
5793492, | Jan 24 1997 | Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. | Wheel profile sensor |
6412332, | Aug 31 1999 | Progress Rail Services Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting objects dragging beneath a train |
6768551, | Oct 17 2001 | International Electronic Machines Corp. | Contactless wheel measurement system and method |
6909514, | Nov 18 2002 | BEENA VISION SYSTEMS, INC | Wheel profile inspection apparatus and method |
6951132, | Jun 27 2003 | General Electric Company | Rail and train monitoring system and method |
7292144, | Nov 26 2003 | Progress Rail Services Corporation | Apparatus and method for contact-less switching |
7861979, | Aug 31 2007 | VOSSLOH SIGNALING USA, INC | Dragging equipment detector |
7937192, | Nov 14 2005 | SIEMENS MOBILITY AUSTRIA GMBH | Detection of derailment by determining the rate of fall |
8006559, | Aug 20 2007 | International Electronic Machines Corporation | Wayside rolling stock inspection |
8430363, | Dec 06 2004 | Progress Rail Services Corporation | Train wheel bearing temperature detection |
20030072001, | |||
20060076461, | |||
20110118899, | |||
20110118914, | |||
CN201296264, | |||
DE4325018, | |||
JP2008240473, | |||
JP200858256, | |||
WO2007009132, | |||
WO2010000850, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 24 2012 | Progress Rail Services Corp | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 02 2012 | BARTONEK, MARK JOSEPH | Progress Rail Services Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 029328 | /0576 | |
Nov 02 2012 | ARNDT, DON | Progress Rail Services Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 029328 | /0576 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 17 2018 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 20 2022 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 26 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 26 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 26 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 26 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 26 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 26 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 26 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 26 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 26 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 26 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 26 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 26 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |