A system and method for detecting dangerous objects and substances are disclosed. According to one embodiment, a method comprises generating a microwave signal that is reflected by a target to render one or more reflected signals. The one or more reflected signals are received at an antenna array. The one or more reflected signals are converted into digital reflected signals. The microwave signal is converted into a digital signal. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to determine the three dimensional position of the target. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to identify the target. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to determine a state of the target; and determine whether the target a dangerous object.
|
9. A system, comprising:
a transmitter in a mobile device including a transmitting antenna, an oscillator, a control circuit of antenna polarization, and a voltage-control circuit oscillator;
one or more receiving radio channel circuitry in the mobile device, the one or more radio channels circuitry including a receiving antenna, a down converter, a low frequency filter;
a digital signal processing module in the mobile device; and
a video display,
wherein the transmitting antenna transmits a microwave signal to be reflected by an object resulting in the object being a scanned object; and
wherein the receiving antenna of the one or more receiving radio channels receives reflected signals from a scanned object.
1. A method, comprising:
generating a microwave signal;
transmitting the microwave signal to be reflected by a target to render one or more reflected signals;
receiving the one or more reflected signals at an antenna array;
converting each received reflected signal into a low frequency reflected signal;
converting each low frequency reflected signal into a digital reflected signal to render one or more digital reflected signals;
converting the microwave signal into a low frequency reference signal;
converting the generated reference signal into a digital reference signal;
processing the one or more digital reflected signals and the digital reference signal to determine a three dimensional position of the target; and
processing the one or more digital reflected signals and the digital reference signal to identify the target.
13. A method, comprising:
generating a microwave signal;
transmitting the microwave signal to be reflected by a target to render one or more reflected signals;
receiving the one or more reflected signals at an antenna array;
converting each received reflected signals into a low frequency reflected signal;
converting each low frequency reflected signal into a digital signal to render one or more digital reflected signals;
converting the microwave signal into a low frequency reference signal;
converting the generated reference signal into a digital reference signal;
processing the one or more digital reflected signals and the digital reference signal to determine a three dimensional position of the target;
processing the one or more digital reflected signals and the digital reference signal to identify the target;
generating a visual representation of the target using the one or more digital reflected signals and the digital reference signal; and
combining the visual representation of the target with an image of the target obtained from a camera to provide an enhanced target image.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
generating a digital representation of the target using the one or more digital reflected signals and the digital reference signal; and
comparing the digital representation of the target with one or more targets stored in a digital library.
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
10. The system of
11. The system of
the transmitter transmits signals at a polarization angle with various polarization using the control circuit of antenna polarization;
the receiving antenna of the one or more receiving radio channels receives the reflected signals reflected from the scanned object on a polarization plane; and
the polarization angle of the transmitter is parallel or orthogonal to the polarization plane of the receiving antenna of the one or more receiving radio channels.
12. The system of
14. The method of
15. The method of
generating a digital representation of the target using the one or more digital reflected signals and the digital reference signal; and
comparing the digital representation of the target with one or more targets stored in a digital library.
16. The method of
17. the method of
18. The method of
|
The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/868,790 filed on Dec. 6, 2006, and is hereby, incorporated by reference.
The field of the invention relates generally to object monitoring and detection systems and more particularly relates to a system and method for detecting dangerous objects and substances.
In today's world, the task of detecting concealed bombs and weapons is becoming more and more important. The higher the resolution of the radio image, the higher the probability of concealed dangerous object detection and the lower the false alarm rate. However, presently available systems do not provide a mobile yet economical solution to detect dangerous objects by reconstructing discernible images of scanning objects.
Most of the current systems for detecting explosive devices and weapons are based on electromagnetic field technology. Such systems require individual objects to pass through a fixed passageway. When metallic objects pass through the passageway, a warning signal is activated indicating a change in magnetic flux. This type of system simply detects metal objects making no determination relative to the amount of metal present. Keys, jewelry, watches, and metal-framed eyeglasses may all trigger such a system.
Another type of detection system generates a microwave image of an object in addition to optical image information. While microwave imaging can provide additional information on concealed objects when used in conjunction with an optical image, microwave imaging still lacks the precision necessary for accurate weapon recognition.
A system and method for detecting dangerous objects and substances are disclosed. According to one embodiment, a method comprises generating a microwave signal that is reflected by a target to render one or more reflected signals. The one or more reflected signals are received at an antenna array. The one or more reflected signals are converted into digital reflected signals. The microwave signal is converted into a digital signal. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to determine the three dimensional position of the target. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to identify the target. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to determine a state of the target; and determine whether the target is a dangerous object.
The accompanying drawings, which are included as part of the present specification, illustrate the presently preferred embodiment of the present invention and together with the general description given above and the detailed description of the preferred embodiment given below serve to explain and teach the principles of the present invention.
A system and method for detecting dangerous objects and substances are disclosed. According to one embodiment, a method comprises generating a microwave signal that is reflected by a target to render one or more reflected signals. The one or more reflected signals are received at an antenna array. The one or more reflected signals are converted into digital reflected signals. The microwave signal is converted into a digital signal. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to determine the three dimensional position of the target. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to identify the target. The digital reflected signals and the digital signal are processed to determine a state of the target; and determine whether the target is a dangerous object.
The present method and system detects and identifies dangerous objects hidden under clothes or in luggage at a distance, for example at 7 meters. Objects of larger size such as a suicide belt with metal parts may be detected at distances of up to 50 meters, according to one embodiment. The device also presents a high-resolution radio image of the target of interest for manual analysis.
The present method and system allows for remote physiological parameters measurement and psycho-physiological information of the target by remote detection of hostile intent.
In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, specific nomenclature is set forth to facilitate an understanding of the various inventive concepts disclosed herein. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required in order to practice the various inventive concepts disclosed herein.
The present invention also relates to apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories, random access memories, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.
The methods presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein.
The transmitter 12 generates a signal to be transmitted by the transmitting antenna 11. The signal is also sent to the down converters 17 for signal processing. The signals transmitted by the transmitting antenna 11 are reflected by the exposed object 14. The reflected signals are received by the array of receiving antennas 16. The reflected signals received by antennas 16 are transferred to down converters 17 via individual channels. Each down converter 17 multiplies the signals that are transmitted by transmitter 12 and received by antennas 16. After conversions the down-converted signals are processed in the low frequency filters 19, where the low-frequency components of the down-converted signals are isolated in each channel and then processed by the analog-to-digital converter 110. The digital signal data provided by A/D converter 110 delivered to computing unit 111 where the radar image of the exposed object 14 is constructed and displayed on the monitor screen 113.
When equipped with an optional video camera 15, the RSD 100 aims at the object 14 using a video image produced by video camera 15 before transmitting the signal with the transmitting antenna 11. The video image can be further processed by the computing unit 111 and used to construct a composite image of the exposed object 14 in combination with the radar image of the exposed object 14 discussed above.
In order to detect dangerous objects, RSD 100 includes a control circuit for antenna polarization 112 to produce and transmit signals with various polarizations. The RSD's transmitting and receiving antennas are also polarized. The polarization plane of the transmitted signal may be parallel or orthogonal to the polarization planes of the receiving antennas. This feature facilitates the detection of dangerous objects by analyzing the depolarization of the received signals.
After the analog signal processing in the low frequency filters 19 has been completed and the signals have been digitized (36), digital signal processing (37) takes place. The signal processing involves calculations that: (a) determine the object position in 3D space (310) on the basis of 2D coordinates (38 and 39); (b) complete the target identification (311); and (c) determine the psycho-physiological attributes of living humans (312). Calculation results are jointly analyzed (313) and the radar image is constructed and displayed on the screen (314).
For object position measurement in 2D coordinates, both the distance to the object 14 and the object's azimuth are calculated.
For calculating the distance to the object 14, the high-frequency signals received by antennas 16 are compared against the transmitted signals with continuous frequency change modulation.
wherein TM/2 is the period of frequency sweep from F1 to F2 and τ is time interval between signal transmission and signal reception and Fd is the analog input sampling rate.
A distance and an azimuth are calculated by a 2D fast Fourier transformation of a data array with dimension nN, wherein n is the number of antenna elements in the row. This results in a bi-variable function ƒ(u,v). The argument u corresponds to the frequency of the received signal, allowing for the determination of the distance to target. The argument v corresponds to the phase difference between the signals received by the neighboring antennae, allowing for the computation of the azimuth of the target.
An exemplary calculation of the distance to an object 14 is given. The emitted signal F′, upon reaching the target 14 at R distance from a rsd 100, is reflected and subsequently received by a receiving antenna 16 at the frequency of F. The emitted signal is received with a time delay, τ=2R/c, where c is the speed of light in air. The received analog signal is converted by down converters 17. Low-frequency filter 19 isolates the low-frequency component of the analog signal, which after signal digitization can be used for the derivation of the frequency, FR which is equal to the difference of frequencies F′ and F at time τ1. Thus the distance to the target R is calculated by:
A distance difference, ΔR, from rec(1) and rec(2) to A is calculated. The phase of the signal received by rec(1) is delayed from the phase of the signal received by rec(2) by:
and λ is the wave length of the radiated (received) signal. The target azimuth α is obtained by calculating the values of Δφ and λ.
3D position measurement uses at least two sets of 2D data. The two sets of 2D data are acquired by the receiving antennas located at different locations. The first data set is obtained when the receiving antenna array is positioned horizontally. When the first data set is processed, the distance to the target R1 and the azimuth α1 in the horizontal plane is obtained. The second data set is obtained when the receiving antennae array is positioned vertically, for example after rotating the antenna array by 90 degrees or when a perpendicular antenna array is used as shown in
If the RSD 100 has a signal polarization block with a control circuit of antenna polarization, the carriage of concealed weapons and shrapnel is determined through the depolarization analysis of the signal reflected from the object 14.
The echo signal reflected from a target 14 has two components that are explained in the representation of the target as an object with a diffusive background and some bright dots. A background may appear diffused because of the object's roughness. The contribution of bright dots is greater than the contribution of the diffusive components in the reflected depolarized signal. Maximum depolarization occurs when the size of the observed small elements constitutes half wavelength. Small elements, for example, may be the shrapnel in a suicide belt, or bolts, ball-bearings, nuts, nails, fragments of metallic pieces. As an example, if the frequency is 50 GHz (Giga Hertz), then the wavelength is about 6 mm (millimeters), and a half-wavelength is about 3 mm. Small elements of the size of 3 mm would exhibit a maximum depolarization effect.
Multi-frequency radiation and the analysis of polarization patterns are applied to improve the image quality (e.g. correction of the bright spots effect). Due to digital phasing, a non-linear coherent algorithm is applied. Subsequent processing resolves any identification problems. A non-linear digital algorithm is applied for the resolution improvement and the object identification. Processing is performed in the time domain. In one embodiment, a non-linear iterative image space reconstruction algorithm (ISRA) is applied. ISRA has several advantages for the current application: (1) Gaussian noise is assumed, which is a good approximation for radiometry applications. (2) The solution of the equation is based on good convergence of the algorithm. (3) The approximation function is non-negative for the relevant range. (4) No additional assumptions are necessary for the transfer function such as invariance, symmetry, etc. (5) Although computationally intensive compared to other algorithms, ISRA features good robustness and results in significant improvement on resolution.
Polarization of the background is random and weakly dependent on the polarization of the probing signal. The diffusive background contributes to the reflected (diffused) signal. In contrast, bright dots of the target 14 make a significant contribution to the diffused signal. They are caused by the fact that the target has small mirrors normally focused to a line of sight. If the size of these mirrors is half of the wavelength (half wave dipole), the contribution to the diffused signal will be maximal. Because the bright dots of the observed object are noticeable because of their comparatively larger reflectivity to other dots of the general object background (neighboring dots)—a small mirror effect is observed. The presence of these small mirrors (bright spots) allows for the identification of typical threats (weapons, etc.) by their relative position with respect to each other and the background. The turn of the polarization plane of the diffused radiation depends on the orientation of the dipole. Therefore, if probing radiation is polarized either vertically or horizontally, and the dipole is focused under 45°, the diffused signal contains both vertical and horizontal polarization. The cross-polarization is evaluated by the polarization coefficient:
wherein Ai and Ak are the amplitudes of the received signals calculated at the vertical and horizontal polarization of the transmitting antenna.
If the target is a half-wave dipole rotated by 45° to the horizon, the depolarization coefficient B will be equal to zero. Since the actual target 14 has randomly oriented dipoles, the polarization factor ranges between 0 and 1. The lower the polarization factor, the greater the probability that a weapon or an explosive belt exists.
Small pieces of firearms and cold steel at a certain perspective also have depolarization abilities. As the weapon has fewer small pieces than an explosive belt, the coefficient of depolarization of an explosive belt and a weapon significantly differ due to the difference in the amount of “small pieces” expressed by the relationship,
Bweapon>Bexplosive
Since RSD 100 detects moving and living humans, the detection of weapons and explosive belts can be done selectively for each irradiated person. This allows for armed persons to be isolated and displayed on the screen.
If the signal is reflected by an object of heterogeneous structure, a rsd 100 produces an array of radar cross sections of the object's points in the examined space. Using the return signal and the object coordinates in 3D space calculated from the return signal, a rsd 100 constructs the radar image (“target portrait” 62). Weapons are detected (69) by matching the “target portrait” with the sample image library (66).
To create a radioscopic image, computing unit 111 processes the return signal. For each point in space observable by RSD 100, the coordinates of the image point and the parameters of the return signal (e.g. signal intensity and the degree of polarization) are determined. The contrast (e.g. brightness) of each image point displayed on the monitor is computed based on the intensity of the signal: the stronger the signal, the darker (shade of gray) the image point is.
Explosives and other dangerous substances exposed to microwave signals may absorb the radiation in certain frequency bands.
When all the information about the analyzed target is obtained, the RSD 100 creates a combined video-radar image of the investigated target 14. The picture can significantly help an operator differentiate suspicious targets from normal targets.
RSD 100 detects plethysmogram in real time. A plethysmogram is a derived “measurement” of heart activity. A plethysmogram can be used to evaluate the heart activity and compute LVET based on an analysis of the fluctuations in the amplitude of the reflected signal and the relative position of the characteristic points on the plethysmogram.
Phase a-b-c, the isometric contraction of the ventricle's systole, occurs with closed heart valves. The beginning of this phase coincides with the phase of abrupt increase in the internal to ventricles pressure. The derivative at point ‘a’ can be used for the analysis of intensity and speed of ventricle operation. The amplitude of a-b-c correlates to the arterial pressure; one of the main parameters of heart operation. Measured peripheral blood pressure can be analyzed as low-pass-filtered arterial pressure.
Therefore, the operation of left ventricle can be characterized by (a) the heartbeat frequency; (b) the speed, with which the left ventricle muscle tissue is changing its tone, e.g. transitions from the relaxed to the contracted state; and (c) the blood pressure created by the left ventricle for opening the valve (instantaneous power of the pump with respect to one blood ejection from the ventricle).
Since the right ventricle operates at an order of magnitude lower power, the plethysmogram of the peripheral pulse provides rich source of information on the physiology of the left ventricle. The processing of physiological parameters make it possible to determine hostile intent of the analyzed target.
The psychological condition of a human being can be characterized by the values of physiological parameters as illustrated in
A system and method for detecting dangerous objects and substances have been described. It is understood that the embodiments described herein are for the purpose of elucidation and should not be considered limiting the subject matter of the present patent. Various modifications, uses, substitutions, combinations, improvements, methods of productions without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention would be evident to a person skilled in the art.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10585185, | Feb 03 2017 | ROHDE & SCHWARZ GMBH & CO KG | Security scanning system with walk-through-gate |
10605895, | Sep 28 2017 | The MITRE Corporation | Radar operation in a nuclear-scintillated environment |
10772511, | May 16 2018 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Motion sensor using cross coupling |
11789140, | Apr 07 2020 | BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO., LTD. | Radar antenna array, mobile user equipment, and method and device for identifying gesture |
9151590, | Mar 01 2012 | Atlas Elektronik GmbH | Proximity sensor and method for determining the proximity to an electrically conductive body |
9958542, | Jan 29 2015 | Alpha Networks Inc.; Alpha Networks Inc | Intelligent monitoring system and method |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3750163, | |||
3922673, | |||
3945006, | Apr 04 1952 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Radio frequency coding system |
3949397, | Feb 06 1970 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Identification - friend or foe system and method |
3956747, | Oct 25 1973 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Radar system comprising a primary radar device and a secondary radar device |
4025920, | Sep 28 1972 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Identification of radar systems |
4155087, | Apr 20 1973 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Radar receiver for detecting coded information buried in radar echoes |
4247815, | Oct 14 1977 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Method and apparatus for physiologic facsimile imaging of biologic targets based on complex permittivity measurements using remote microwave interrogation |
4320298, | Apr 27 1962 | The Marquardt Corporation | Warhead detector |
4321601, | Apr 23 1971 | WESTINGHOUSE NORDEN SYSTEMS INCORPORATED | Three dimensional, azimuth-correcting mapping radar |
4323898, | Jun 23 1980 | Sperry Corporation | Polarization detector |
4323899, | Jun 23 1980 | Sperry Corporation | Polarization detector |
4403314, | Mar 18 1980 | Thomson-CSF | Active detection system using simultaneous multiple transmissions |
4546355, | Jun 17 1982 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Range/azimuth/elevation ship imaging for ordnance control |
4549184, | Jun 09 1981 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Moving target ordnance control |
4563686, | Jun 17 1982 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Range/doppler ship imaging for ordnance control |
4566009, | Oct 16 1979 | SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, BERLIN AND MUNICH, A CORP OF GERMANY | Identification, friend or foe IFF installation |
4694297, | Feb 27 1984 | HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL DEFENCE OF HER MAJESTY S CANADIAN GOVERNMENT | Remote identification device |
4723124, | Mar 21 1986 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Extended SAR imaging capability for ship classification |
4792796, | Nov 20 1986 | R J S SECURITY & TRACKING SYSTEMS CORPORATION | Electronic alarm apparatus |
4821291, | Sep 22 1986 | AMACRINE INTERNATIONAL, INC | Improvements in or relating to signal communication systems |
4862176, | Feb 20 1977 | Emi Limited | Identification of friend or foe (IFF) systems |
4879756, | Sep 22 1986 | AMACRINE INTERNATIONAL, INC | Radio broadcast communication systems |
4926868, | Apr 15 1987 | Method and apparatus for cardiac hemodynamic monitor | |
4937586, | Sep 22 1986 | AMACRINE INTERNATIONAL, INC | Radio broadcast communication systems with multiple loop antennas |
5051748, | Aug 03 1988 | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; ETAT-FRANCAIS-LABORATOIRE CENTRAL DES PONTS ET CHAUSSEES | Device for transmitting and receiving microwave radiation, for forming images of buried objects |
5073782, | Apr 19 1988 | MLV EQUITY LLC; MVT Equity LLC | Contraband detection system |
5124709, | Jul 20 1990 | Spectronix Ltd. | Method and apparatus for detecting fire, explosion, and/or projectile penetration |
5177432, | May 31 1991 | PIVOT INTERNATIONAL, INC | Wireless velocity detector for a bicycle having a rotating AC magnetic field and receiver coils |
5227800, | Apr 19 1988 | MLV EQUITY LLC; MVT Equity LLC | Contraband detection system |
5245534, | Sep 10 1991 | ELECTRONIC RETAILING SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC | Electronic tag location systems |
5337053, | Oct 22 1993 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Method and apparatus for classifying targets |
5339082, | Sep 29 1983 | Washington State University Foundation | FM/CW sensor processor for target recognition |
5341141, | Mar 09 1993 | Raytheon Company | Three dimensional imaging radar |
5361072, | Feb 28 1992 | CODAR Ocean Sensors, Ltd | Gated FMCW DF radar and signal processing for range/doppler/angle determination |
5374815, | Mar 15 1993 | ELECTRONIC RETAILING SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC | Technique for locating electronic labels in an electronic price display system |
5375146, | May 06 1993 | VIZADA, INC | Digital frequency conversion and tuning scheme for microwave radio receivers and transmitters |
5406842, | Oct 07 1993 | GENERAL DYNAMICS C4 SYSTEMS, INC | Method and apparatus for material level measurement using stepped frequency microwave signals |
5455590, | Aug 30 1991 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Real-time holographic surveillance system |
5472309, | May 13 1985 | Computer Aided Systems, Inc. | System for delivery |
5504487, | May 17 1995 | Fastman, Inc. | System for extracting targets from radar signatures |
5507291, | Apr 05 1994 | Method and an associated apparatus for remotely determining information as to person's emotional state | |
5532465, | Mar 15 1993 | ELECTRONIC RETAILING SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC | Technique for locating electronic labels in an electronic price display system |
5533606, | Sep 13 1994 | Kabushiki Kaisha Yuyama Seisakusho | Apparatus for storing and transporting drugs |
5561431, | Oct 24 1994 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Wavelet transform implemented classification of sensor data |
5612700, | May 17 1995 | Fastman, Inc. | System for extracting targets from radar signatures |
5646616, | Jul 01 1994 | Murata Kikai Kabushiki Kaisha | Picking system |
5670886, | May 22 1991 | Wolff Controls Corporation | Method and apparatus for sensing proximity or position of an object using near-field effects |
5875434, | Mar 15 1995 | Fujitsu Limited | System for picking articles |
5877962, | Oct 25 1993 | Cart | |
5905380, | May 08 1995 | MACC | Electromagnetic wave, reflective type, low cost, active proximity sensor for harsh environments |
5943841, | Jul 18 1995 | Knapp Holding GmbH | Commissioning system |
6032127, | Apr 24 1995 | INTERMEC IP CORP , A CORPORATION OF DELAWARE | Intelligent shopping cart |
6057761, | Jan 21 1997 | EMIT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Security system and method |
6121920, | May 26 1999 | BARRETT HOLDING LCC | Method and apparatus for enhancing target detection using polarization modulation |
6208908, | Apr 27 1999 | SI Handling Systems, Inc. | Integrated order selection and distribution system |
6222481, | Jul 05 1996 | Forsvarets Forskningsanstalt | Method of detecting and classifying objects by means of radar |
6308109, | Jun 09 1995 | Kabushiki Kaisha Yuyama Seisakusho | Method and apparatus for delivering drugs |
6337654, | Nov 05 1999 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | A-scan ISAR classification system and method therefor |
6359582, | Sep 18 1996 | PEACOCK MYERS, P C | Concealed weapons detection system |
6437728, | Nov 05 1999 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | A-scan ISAR target recognition system and method |
6505093, | May 03 2000 | SI HANDLING SYSTEMS, INC | Automated order filling method and system |
6573732, | May 04 1999 | SSI TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Dynamic range sensor and method of detecting near field echo signals |
6720905, | Aug 28 2002 | LEVITAN, ARTHUR C ; KOSOWSKY, LESTER | Methods and apparatus for detecting concealed weapons |
6856272, | Aug 28 2002 | KOSOWSKY, LESTER | Methods and apparatus for detecting threats in different areas |
6927728, | Mar 13 2003 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for multi-antenna transmission |
6965340, | Nov 24 2004 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | System and method for security inspection using microwave imaging |
6967612, | Oct 22 2004 | RAPISCAN LABORATORIES, INC | System and method for standoff detection of human carried explosives |
6972714, | Jun 08 2004 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Optically-augmented microwave imaging system and method |
6982666, | Jun 08 2001 | NAVY, THE USA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE; NAVY, USA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE, THE | Three-dimensional synthetic aperture radar for mine detection and other uses |
7028861, | Dec 16 2003 | JOSEPH S KANFER | Electronically keyed dispensing systems and related methods of installation and use |
7046015, | Apr 28 2003 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Ultrasonic distance measure |
7046186, | Mar 10 2003 | Rafael-Armament Development Authority, Ltd | Friend/foe identification system for a battlefield |
7049963, | Apr 09 2003 | Visible Assets, Inc | Networked RF tag for tracking freight |
7088290, | Aug 30 2002 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America | Dielectric loaded antenna apparatus with inclined radiation surface and array antenna apparatus including the dielectric loaded antenna apparatus |
7098645, | Sep 14 2005 | Agilent Technologies, Inc.; Agilent Technologies, Inc | Method and device for cable length measurement based on reflected phase shifts |
7183963, | Mar 24 2005 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | System and method for inspecting transportable items using microwave imaging |
7196654, | Jul 26 2003 | GUIDANCE NAVIGATION HOLDINGS LIMITED | Vehicle positioning and tracking radar system |
7295149, | Oct 19 2005 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method for determining missile information from radar returns |
7385549, | Aug 12 2003 | Trex Enterprises Corp | Millimeter wave portal imaging system |
7385552, | Jul 11 2002 | Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation | Real-time, cross-correlating millimeter wave imaging system using dual pill-box antennas |
7450052, | May 25 1999 | PEACOCK MYERS, P C | Object detection method and apparatus |
20020057216, | |||
20030179126, | |||
20030193430, | |||
20040041724, | |||
20040053641, | |||
20040069849, | |||
20040077943, | |||
20040100379, | |||
20040113783, | |||
20040119646, | |||
20040149822, | |||
20040201454, | |||
20040205350, | |||
20050007124, | |||
20050029149, | |||
20050029345, | |||
20050043850, | |||
20050062640, | |||
20050073310, | |||
20050083213, | |||
20050086983, | |||
20050093733, | |||
20050104603, | |||
20050107693, | |||
20050113703, | |||
20050128131, | |||
20050149226, | |||
20050156780, | |||
20050205817, | |||
20050251330, | |||
20060124662, | |||
20060128023, | |||
20060164232, | |||
20060181413, | |||
20060220857, | |||
20060232417, | |||
20060258896, | |||
20070171119, | |||
20070194976, | |||
20070194982, | |||
20070205937, | |||
20100027737, | |||
WO2007086664, | |||
WO3091715, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 06 2007 | Radical Development Holding S.A. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 10 2008 | MOSTOV, KIRILL | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020785 | /0763 | |
Apr 10 2008 | LIPTSEN, EFIM | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 2ND CONVEYING PARTY S NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033100 FRAME 0412 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT | 033482 | /0913 | |
Apr 10 2008 | MOSTOV, KIRILL | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 2ND CONVEYING PARTY S NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033100 FRAME 0412 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT | 033482 | /0913 | |
Apr 10 2008 | LIPTSEN, EFIM | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF INVENTOR FROM EFIM LIPSTEN TO EFIM LIPTSEN PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033100 FRAME 0412 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR | 033280 | /0058 | |
Apr 10 2008 | MOSTOV, KIRILL | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF INVENTOR FROM EFIM LIPSTEN TO EFIM LIPTSEN PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033100 FRAME 0412 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR | 033280 | /0058 | |
Apr 10 2008 | LIPSTEN, EFIM | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF ASSIGNEE FROM KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, INC DELAWARE TO KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC NEVADA PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 020785 FRAME 0763 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR | 033100 | /0412 | |
Apr 10 2008 | MOSTOV, KIRILL | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF ASSIGNEE FROM KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, INC DELAWARE TO KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC NEVADA PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 020785 FRAME 0763 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR | 033100 | /0412 | |
Apr 10 2008 | LIPTSEN, EFIM | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020785 | /0763 | |
Jun 15 2014 | KIRSEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC | RADICAL DEVELOPMENT HOLDING S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 033253 | /0580 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 02 2018 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Apr 25 2022 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 10 2022 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 02 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 02 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 02 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 02 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 02 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 02 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 02 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 02 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 02 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 02 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 02 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 02 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |