This invention provides a method for reducing mercury emissions from a cement plant comprising at least a particulate collection device and a preheater tower comprised of one or more preheater cyclones. The method comprises injecting pulverized coal into at least one preheater cyclone of said cement plant.
|
1. A method for reducing mercury emissions from a cement plant comprising at least a particulate collection device and a preheater tower comprised of one or more preheater cyclones, the method characterized by injecting pulverized coal into at least one preheater cyclone of said cement plant, wherein said injecting is into at least one preheater cyclone at temperature in range of about 400° C. to about 800° C.
2. A method as in
3. A method as in
4. A method as in
5. A method as in
6. A method as in
7. A method as in any of
8. A method as in any of
9. A method as in
|
This application is the National Stage of International Patent Application PCT/US2011/034180, filed on Apr. 27, 2011, which application claims priority from U.S. Application No. 61/331,219, filed May 4, 2010, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to reduction of mercury emissions from cement plants.
Research into sources of mercury emissions in the U.S. has resulted in the identification of cement producing facilities as significant emission source of mercury. Currently, cement plants are the fourth largest source of mercury emissions in the U.S. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a rule to limit mercury emissions from cement plants. The proposed rule sets forth the first limits on mercury emissions from existing cement plants and strengthens the limits for new plants. The proposed rule sets mercury emission limits for existing sources at 26 pounds of mercury per million tons of feed (˜13 kg/million tons) or 43 pounds of mercury per million tons of clinker produced (˜21.5 kg/million tons). For new cement plants, the mercury emission limit is 14 pounds of mercury per million tons of clinker produced (˜7.0 kg/million tons). The proposed rule is set to take effect in 2013. The EPA estimates that when the rule is fully implemented, annual emissions of mercury from cement plants will be reduced by at least 81%.
It is known that activated carbon can be injected into a gas stream containing mercury vapor. When mercury vapor contacts activated carbon particles, the mercury is captured and held by the activated carbon particles. The particles are then collected by a particulate collection device, such as an electrostatic precipitator or a baghouse filter.
Relatively inexpensive and yet effective ways to reduce mercury emissions from cement plants are quite desirable.
This invention provides methods for reducing the emissions of mercury at low cost. The methods provided herein can be easily incorporated into existing cement plants without requiring extensive reconfiguration.
An embodiment of this invention is a method for reducing mercury emissions from a cement plant comprising at least a particulate collection device and a preheater tower comprised of one or more preheater cyclones. The method comprises injecting pulverized coal into at least one preheater cyclone of said cement plant.
These and other embodiments and features of this invention will be still further apparent from the ensuing description, drawings, and appended claims.
The configurations of cement plants vary, but have several features in common. A generalized cement plant configuration showing pertinent parts is shown in
The Figures are not intended to be construed as limiting the invention. For example, the present invention applies to cement plants that do not have a raw material mill, as well as to cement plants that do have a raw material mill.
In the embodiments of this invention, the pulverized coal can be from a source external to the cement plant. Alternatively, the pulverized coal can be from the coal baghouse, if the coal is pulverized onsite at the cement plant.
In the methods of this invention, the pulverized coal is injected into one or more of the preheater cyclones that make up the preheater tower. Recommended injection points vary with the coal type, coal particle size, volatile and moisture content of the coal, oxygen level, and the like. For example, in the high temperature zones of the preheater tower (in range of about 400° C. to about 800° C.), moisture and volatiles of fine particles of the coal are released, and more pores and more surface area are formed in the fine particles of coal.
A typical preheater tower of a cement plant is shown in
A preferred way of operating is to inject water into at least one preheater cyclone of the cement plant, so that the pulverized coal, at least in part, undergoes steam activation. Preferably, the water is injected with the pulverized coal; more preferably, the pulverized coal is mixed with water, and the mixture of water and pulverized coal is injected.
In the practice of this invention, the reduction of mercury emissions employs pulverized coal. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the pulverized coal comes into contact with mercury and/or mercury-containing compounds, which are then absorbed by the pulverized coal. The fine particles of the pulverized coal travel from the injection point in the preheater tower via the gas stream vent of the preheater cyclone, and are collected, along with other particulates, in the particulate collection device of the cement plant. From the particulate collection device, the pulverized coal (and other particulates collected) can be recirculated through the plant. In such recirculation, the particulates are usually sent initially to the preheater tower.
It is noted that the pulverized coal is comprised of particles of various sizes. In the preheater tower, the fine particulates flow with the gas stream out of the preheater tower and ultimately to the particulate collection device. Large-sized particles of coal travel out of the preheater tower into the kiln; conditions in the kiln destroy the absorptive properties of the coal, so that it can no longer absorb mercury. The demarcation between fine particles that travel with the gas stream and large-sized particles that instead enter the kiln depends on several variables, including velocity of the gas stream, conditions in the preheater cyclones, and so forth.
In some instances, the particulates, which include the pulverized coal, are recycled to the cement-making process. As part of the recycling, the pulverized coal returns to the preheater tower. Mercury absorbed by the pulverized coal will be released from the coal when the coal enters the preheater tower. The released mercury can be recaptured in the particulate collection device later.
Low levels of bromination have been observed to increase the mercury-removal performance of activated carbon sorbents; see in this regard U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,494. Preferably, an effective amount of a bromine-containing substance is brought into contact with the pulverized coal for a sufficient time to increase the ability of the pulverized coal to adsorb mercury and mercury-containing compounds. Injection of an amount of a bromine-containing substance to provide about 1 wt % of bromine on the pulverized coal is recommended, although injecting enough bromine-containing substance to provide about 5 wt % bromine to the pulverized coal is expected to yield better mercury absorption, and may be preferable. Injecting enough bromine-containing substance to provide about 15 wt % bromine to the pulverized coal is generally expected to produce an even more capable mercury sorbent, but there is a greater possibility that some amount of bromine may evolve from the pulverized coal under some circumstances. Greater degrees of bromination generally correlate with greater maximum mercury capacities for a particular sorbent. However, the optimum level of bromine-containing substance to combine with the pulverized coal varies with the particular situation.
Suitable bromine-containing substances include dissolved metal bromides, especially bromides of K+, Na+, or NH4+; hydrogen halide salts; elemental bromine, and hydrogen bromide. Preferred bromine-containing substances are elemental bromine (Br2) and/or hydrogen bromide (HBr); preferably, the elemental bromine and/or hydrogen bromide are in gaseous form when brought into contact with the pulverized coal. Such contacting of the pulverized coal and a bromine-containing substance significantly increases the pulverized coal's ability to absorb mercury and mercury-containing compounds.
The contacting of the bromine-containing substance and the pulverized coal can occur at any point during or after the introduction of the pulverized coal.
Components referred to by chemical name or formula anywhere in the specification or claims hereof, whether referred to in the singular or plural, are identified as they exist prior to coming into contact with another substance referred to by chemical name or chemical type (e.g., another component, a solvent, or etc.). It matters not what chemical changes, transformations and/or reactions, if any, take place in the resulting mixture or solution as such changes, transformations, and/or reactions are the natural result of bringing the specified components together under the conditions called for pursuant to this disclosure. Thus the components are identified as ingredients to be brought together in connection with performing a desired operation or in forming a desired composition.
The invention may comprise, consist, or consist essentially of the materials and/or procedures recited herein.
As used herein, the term “about” modifying the quantity of an ingredient in the compositions of the invention or employed in the methods of the invention refers to variation in the numerical quantity that can occur, for example, through typical measuring and liquid handling procedures used for making concentrates or use solutions in the real world; through inadvertent error in these procedures; through differences in the manufacture, source, or purity of the ingredients employed to make the compositions or carry out the methods; and the like. The term about also encompasses amounts that differ due to different equilibrium conditions for a composition resulting from a particular initial mixture. Whether or not modified by the term “about”, the claims include equivalents to the quantities.
Except as may be expressly otherwise indicated, the article “a” or “an” if and as used herein is not intended to limit, and should not be construed as limiting, the description or a claim to a single element to which the article refers. Rather, the article “a” or “an” if and as used herein is intended to cover one or more such elements, unless the text expressly indicates otherwise.
This invention is susceptible to considerable variation in its practice. Therefore the foregoing description is not intended to limit, and should not be construed as limiting, the invention to the particular exemplifications presented hereinabove.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1984164, | |||
4500327, | Jul 08 1982 | Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. | Process for removal of mercury vapor and adsorbent therefor |
5827352, | Apr 16 1997 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. | Method for removing mercury from a gas stream and apparatus for same |
5900042, | Aug 18 1997 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Method for the removal of elemental mercury from a gas stream |
6514907, | Jul 25 1997 | JAPAN ENVIROCHEMICALS, LTD | Bromine-impregnated activated carbon and process for preparing the same |
6521021, | Jan 09 2002 | The United States of America as represented by the United States Department of Energy | Thief process for the removal of mercury from flue gas |
6808692, | Feb 14 2002 | HAZELMERE RESEARCH LTD | Enhanced mercury control in coal-fired power plants |
6818043, | Jan 23 2003 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. | Vapor-phase contaminant removal by injection of fine sorbent slurries |
6848374, | Jun 03 2003 | GENERAL ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY GMBH | Control of mercury emissions from solid fuel combustion |
6878358, | Jul 22 2002 | Bromerc Limited | Process for removing mercury from flue gases |
6953494, | May 06 2002 | ALBEMARLE AMENDMENTS, LLC | Sorbents and methods for the removal of mercury from combustion gases |
20020114749, | |||
20050039598, | |||
20060204418, | |||
20060205592, | |||
20070051239, | |||
20070140940, | |||
20070179056, | |||
20070180990, | |||
20070254807, | |||
20090193968, | |||
20100000406, | |||
20100316546, | |||
DE102007005788, | |||
JP2002284550, | |||
JP2002355531, | |||
JP2003192407, | |||
JP2006045006, | |||
WO2009107620, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 27 2011 | Albemarle Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 30 2011 | LIU, XIN | Albemarle Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026547 | /0986 | |
Jun 30 2011 | MILLER, JON E | Albemarle Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026547 | /0986 | |
Jan 01 2023 | Albemarle Corporation | ALBEMARLE AMENDMENTS, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 062667 | /0139 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 30 2018 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 28 2022 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 28 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 28 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |