An elevator comprising a cabin (1), vertical guide elements (2, 3) for guiding said cabin, at least one suspension or support belt (4, 5), groups of pulleys associated to the guide elements and the cabin; each of said groups of pulleys is composed of at least two coplanar pulleys arranged on parallel axles and vertically one above the other; each of the groups of pulleys comprises pulleys having a diameter decreasing from a pulley of a maximum diameter to a pulley of a minimum diameter. Preferred embodiments of the belts having one or two concave or convex surfaces and internal reinforcing wires are disclosed.
|
1. An elevator comprising: a cabin with a top and a bottom including at least two side walls and a back wall disposed between said top and said bottom; vertical guide elements for guiding said cabin, said vertical guide elements each defining a length extending between oppositely disposed ends; two support belts arranged symmetrically on one of said side walls or said back wall of said cabin; each of said belts passing around a respective plurality of groups of pulleys disposed between said oppositely disposed ends, comprising fixed groups of stationary pulleys mounted to said length of said vertical guide elements, and a number of moving groups of travelling pulleys corresponding to said fixed groups of stationary pulleys where said moving groups of travelling pulleys are mounted to the cabin between said top and said bottom of said cabin, wherein
each of said groups of pulleys comprises at least two pulleys, where said groups of pulleys are arranged on mutually parallel axles and where said groups of pulleys arranged on said mutually parallel axles are further arranged vertically parallel one above the other,
said pulleys of each of said groups of pulleys are substantially coplanar,
said fixed groups of stationary pulleys being mounted at a position proximal to both of said oppositely disposed ends of each of said vertical guide elements, and
each of said groups of pulleys comprises at least two pulleys having a diameter progressively decreasing from a first pulley of said group having a maximum diameter, to a last pulley of said group having a minimum diameter, wherein one of said pulleys in two of said groups of pulleys is a drive pulley connected to a motor or a motor with a reduction gear,
wherein each of said belts passing around each group of pulleys are co-planar and extend in substantially the same vertical direction of said pulleys in said group thereby minimizing lateral deviation during use of said elevator.
2. The elevator according to
3. The elevator according to
4. The elevator according to
5. The elevator according to
6. The elevator according to
7. The elevator according to
8. The elevator according to
9. The elevator according to
10. The elevator according to
11. The elevator according to
12. The elevator according to
13. The elevator according to
14. The elevator according to
15. The elevator according to
16. The elevator according to
17. The elevator according to
18. The elevator according to
19. The elevator according to
20. The elevator according to
21. The elevator according to
22. The elevator according to
23. The elevator according to
24. The elevator according to
25. The elevator according to
|
This application is a USC §371 national phase application of PCT/EP2009/062341 filed on Sep. 23, 2009, which claims priority to and the benefit of Swiss Patent Application No. CH 1550/08, filed Sep. 30, 2008; Swiss Patent Application No. CH 1171/09, filed Jul. 24, 2009; Swiss Patent Application No. CH 1192/09, filed Jul. 30, 2009 and Swiss Patent Application No. CH 1457, filed Sep. 21, 2009, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention concerns an elevator as defined in the preamble of claim 1.
Said elevator has a self-supporting construction, being essentially supported by the vertical guide elements of the cabin. The elevator remains independent of the structure of the house, with significant cost advantages.
Said elevator can operate with or without a counterweight and is used particularly in family homes, usually for serving a small number of people and with a lifting capacity limited to few persons. It nevertheless represents a very large field of application comprising new buildings under construction as well as renovation of existing buildings to meet nowadays requirements of comfort. Hence, there is the need to offer the possibility to install an elevator in buildings that were not originally planned for this purpose, and without requiring costly and invasive transformations to the building.
WO 2008/056026 discloses an elevator provided with supporting cords on one side of the cabin guided by rails situated at the side of the cabin, comprising a plurality of groups of pulleys, each group in turn comprising a plurality of pulleys.
The plurality of pulleys arranged in each group of pulleys is intended to correspondingly reduce—according to the well known principle of multiple pulleys or sheaves—the power required for lifting the cabin. This arrangement is useful where no counterweight is installed, allowing a “lifting by friction” without compensation for the weight of the cabin. The cited prior art discloses that the pulleys of each group of pulleys are arranged coaxially, i.e. they are supported on one single axle, one next to the other. This solution has the advantage that less space is taken in vertical direction, as all the pulleys of one group of pulleys are located at the same level. On the other hand, it has the considerable drawback that belts cannot be used as a support means, because belts passing from one pulley of a group to the next do not permit lateral deviations, or require particular assisting elements (such as guide elements, etc.). This problem can be solved using cords and pulleys with large grooves, but on the other hand the cords require pulleys with a very large diameter. There are legal regulations specifying for example that the diameter of the pulleys must be equal to a multiple (30, 40 times) of the diameter of a steel cord.
A further disadvantage of coaxially arranged pulleys is that they generate an overturning momentum on the cabin, which results in major abrasion on the guide elements and increase of the traction power.
The present invention is aimed at overcoming the above problems and disadvantages of the prior art.
These aims are reached by an elevator with groups of coplanar pulleys having a decreasing diameter, according to independent claim 1. Preferred embodiments are disclosed in the dependent claims.
In one of the various embodiments of the invention, one suspension belt is arranged in the symmetry plane of one of the lateral walls or back wall of the cabin. In another embodiment, two support belts are arranged symmetrically on one of the side walls or the back wall of the cabin.
Each of the groups of pulleys can be composed of any number of vertically aligned pulleys, with a diameter progressively decreasing from a first larger pulley to a last and smaller pulley. In common embodiments of the invention, each group is composed of two or three pulleys. At least one of the pulleys is driven by a suitable motor. In some embodiments, a disc-like motor can be used to save space.
Particularly preferred embodiments of the invention relate to preferred form of the belt or belts of the cabin.
According to a first of said embodiments, the elevator comprises one or more flat belt(s) to drive the cabin, and the pulleys have correspondingly a groove for a flat belt.
According to another embodiment, the elevator comprises one or more belts with an arcuate cross section. A preferred form of an arcuate cross section belt is disclosed in detail in the priority application CH 1192/09, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference. The belt has a concave face and an opposite convex face, one of said concave and convex face being in contact with said pulleys. The pulleys having a contact surface which is correspondingly convex or concave, to engage the concave or convex face of the belt. The concave and convex faces of the belt are preferably parallel.
According to still a further embodiment, the elevator comprises one or more belt(s) with one flat face and an opposite convex or concave working surface. The working surface is in contact with the pulleys and the pulleys have correspondingly a concave or convex surface to engage the working surface of the belt. A preferred embodiment is discloses in detail in the priority application CH 1457/09, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Preferably the belt or belts of the elevator are reinforced with a plurality of internal wires, made of appropriate material with a high resistance to traction. In a belt with an arcuate cross section, the reinforcing wires are preferably arranged on a plane parallel to the convex and concave opposite surfaces. In the embodiment where the belt (or belts) has one flat surface and an opposite concave or convex working surface, the reinforcing wires are preferably arranged on a plane parallel to the flat surface. The wires are for example steel wires having a diameter between 0.5 and 3 mm and distanced each other by 1 to 5 mm, preferably 2-3 mm. Reinforcing with internal wires is applicable to all the above disclosed embodiments of the belt or belts.
In further embodiments, the belts and the pulleys are equipped with respective means to increase the friction. In some embodiments, for example, the belt is toothed and the pulleys have corresponding teeth adapted to engage the toothed belt. Said teeth or equivalent means to increase the friction are applicable to flat belts as well as to belts with one or two concave or convex surfaces, as above disclosed.
The invention permits application of pulleys of minimum diameter, requiring less lateral space and keeping all the functional advantages of belts over steel cords, in particular if applied in elevators without counterweight, which in the known art depend on the friction exerted onto the rope of the driving pulley for correct movement.
The coplanar pulleys placed on mutually parallel axes, located one above the other vertically, and of diminishing diameters, allow to obtain a course of the belt adapted to reduce the power requirements by a factor of 4, 6 or more. The reduction of power requirements is obtained with the adoption of 2, 3 pulleys per group, etc. in such manner that the single parallel vertical tracts of the belt are not contacting each other, and that the belt does not undergo any lateral deviation. The invention provides a higher coefficient of friction and the possibility of applying smaller pulleys without requiring lateral guide elements for the belt, which moves always in the same plane and do not induce any lateral excursion of the cabin. Further advantages are the silent and vibration-free operation.
The invention is applicable to various elevators with or without counterweight. Embodiments with no counterweight are preferred as they make full use of all the advantages such as higher friction properties on the belt, but application to elevators with a counterweight is also possible.
The advantages of the invention, thanks to the fact that the belts are applied in arrangements requiring a minimum of space, and with a higher factor of reduction of the drive power required, allow realisation of elevators with or without counterweight under conditions of scarce availability of space, at limited cost, and securing efficient and reliable operation.
The advantages of the preferred belts with one or two convex/concave surface will be discussed with the help of the examples in the detailed description.
These and other advantages of the invention will be elucidated hereinbelow with reference to preferred and non-limiting embodiments.
A list of the elements in
The groups 6′ and 7′ are opposite to groups 6, 7 and are hidden behind the cabin 1 in
Two of these groups, namely the groups 6, 7 and 6′, 7′, are fixed to the cabin 1 whereas the other two groups 8, 8′ and 9, 9′ are fixed to the guide elements.
The groups 8 and 8′ are fixed to the bottom portion of the guide elements 2 and 3 respectively, and the groups 9, 9′ are fixed to the top portion of said guide elements 2 and 3.
In the example of
The axes of pulleys of each group are mutually parallel and are superimposed in vertical direction one above the other. The reduction factor of the lifting power obtained in the pulley arrangement of
The pulleys of groups 6-9 and 6′-9′ are arranged coplanar, and furthermore the two pulleys of each group are of a diameter decreasing from pulleys of a maximum diameter 6a, 7a, 8a, 9a and 6′a, 7′a, 8′a, 9′a respectively, to pulleys of a smaller diameter 6b, 7b, 8b, 9b, and 6′b, 7′b, 8′b, 9′b.
Movement of the cabin 1 can be effected in various modes: for example a motor, or a motor with reduction gear, rotates any one of the pulleys of one of the groups of pulleys for one belt. Referring to
The two support belts 4, 5, according to embodiments of the invention, are symmetrically arranged on one of the lateral walls 11, 12 or of the back wall 13 of the cabin 1.
The belts 4 and 5 are held under tension with the help of a suitable tension or compensation mechanism, for example a spring 14 as shown in
The location of the groups of pulleys 6, 7, 6′ and 7′ is chosen in such a manner that the cabin 1 can move down as far as possible, i.e. to just above the drive motor 10, and upward as high as possible. In this arrangement the group of pulleys 8, 8′, and 9, 9′ respectively, can be “stacked” one above the other without colliding with the groups of pulleys 6, 6′, and 7, 7′ respectively. Thus the full length of the guide elements 2 and 3 can be exploited.
The arrangement of the guide elements 2, 3 must take into account the position of the access openings of the cabin 1. If the back wall 13 contains a door, it is not possible to provide a guide element corresponding with this wall. For this reason, arrangement of the guide elements 2, 3 corresponding with the lateral walls 11, 12 is generally preferred.
The pulleys of groups 6, 7 and 6′, 7′ are fixed to the cabin 1. As the cabin 1 moves upward from the bottom, the distance f between the group of pulleys 7, 7′ and 8, 8′ increases, whereas the distance F between the group of pulleys 6, 6′ and 9, 9′ decreases, and vice versa when the cabin 1 moves downwards.
In this example the groups of pulleys 6, 7, 8 and 9 each comprises three coplanar pulleys 6a, 6b, 6c; 7a, 7b, 7c; 8a, 8b, 8c; 9a, 9b, 9c. The diameter of said pulleys decreases from −a through −c. For example, the first pulley 6a of group 6 has a diameter greater than that of the second pulley 6b, and pulley 6b has a diameter greater than the third pulley 6c. The reduction factor of the lifting power obtained in the three-pulley arrangement of
The groups 6 and 7 are fixed to the wall 12 of the cabin 1, whereas the groups 8 and 9 are fixed, with the help of the cross members 15 and 16, to the guide elements 2 and 3 of the cabin 1.
In the
According to a preferred embodiment, the drive motor 10 is a motor with an inner stator and a rotor forming a sleeve extending over at least part of a distance h between the two pulleys 8a and 8′a mutually connected for rotation. This solution has the advantage that motors of a minimum diameter can be applied, and thus the space in vertical direction can be fully used, e.g. allowing descent of the cabin to a lower level or to move up to a higher level. The example illustrated in the
According to another embodiment, illustrated in the
As specified already, the present invention, and the particular arrangement of the pulleys provided therewith, illustrated in the
In the
The elements corresponding to the ones shown in the preceding Figures are designated using the same reference numbers. In this further embodiment, the guide elements 2 and 3 are located at both sides of one of the lateral walls 11 or 12 of the cabin 1, in the specific case illustrated being the wall 11, in such a manner that the cabin 1 is suspended on the guide elements 2 and 3. The drive power is reduced by a factor 6. This solution furthermore provides that the cabin 1 is fixed to a supporting plate 19, which can prove advantageous particularly in the case of restructuration of an existing building, as it permits realisation of a “cantilevered” cabin 1.
The factor of power reduction and thus of the friction required between the drive pulley and the belt, can be increased to 8 or more by increasing the number of pulleys in each group. For example, four pulleys per group gives a factor equal to 8, six pulleys per group gives a factor equal to 12, etc. Experience has shown that a reduction of driving power by a factor of four or six is normally sufficient.
Anyhow, in case a power reduction by a factor of six (three pulleys per group) might be required in a particular case as shown in the
A belt 101 has a convex surface 102 parallel to an opposite concave surface 103, and lateral faces 104, 105. The belt 101 is reinforced with steel wires 107, 107′ . . . 107n to increase the resistance to traction stress. Preferably said wires have a diameter of 1 to 3 mm. The wires are arranged parallel to the surfaces 102 and 103 and following the arc of the belt 101, as can be appreciated from
The belt 101 is preferably thin and wide. To this purpose, the thickness d is at least 8 times smaller than the width L, i.e. L/d is equal to or greater than 8. The radius r is preferably such as the ratio between L and the height h in
One of the faces 102, 103 is in contact, during operation, with the pulleys. The belt 101 passing around a pulley 106 is shown in
In a further variant (
The belt according to this embodiment of the invention, such as the belt 101, is self-centering on the pulleys. For example, it can be seen from
Hence, the pulleys do not require guiding edges that may cause wear of the lateral edges of a conventional belt. Another advantage is the improved adherence to the pulley and the constant contact pressure, which is more uniform than a flat belt. Hence, a greater torque can be transmitted from the pulley to the belt, in comparison with a flat belt. The inventive arcuate belt has a longer life than a conventional belt and do not require any lateral guide edge.
In a preferred embodiment, the concave or convex contact surface of the pulley is shaped to induce a slight deformation of arcuate cross section of the belt, during operation. Specific means to improve the friction, such as the teeth 108 and 110, are preferably adopted for driving pulleys and belts, i.e. for the pulley and belts that transmit a torque during operation.
Referring to the figures, a belt 201 has a working surface 202 opposite to a non-working flat surface 203. The working surface 202 may be convex or concave, according to equivalent embodiments.
The belt 201 is optionally reinforced with highly resistant wires 204 to 204n which are disposed in a plane g-g parallel to the non-working plane surface 203.
Referring to
Preferred features of the belt 201 are the following. The wires 204 to 204n are preferably steel wires having a diameter between 0.5 and 2 mm, the distance f between two of said wires being preferably 1.5 to 5 mm and more preferably 2 to 3 mm. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the width L is between 20 and 100 mm and more preferably in the range 30 to 70 mm, especially for use in an elevator without counterweight.
Measures to increase the friction between the belt and the pulley, such as teeth 205 and 207 (
The further realization according to
Another advantage is that the reinforcing wires are stressed with a “pure” traction stress, i.e. the flexional stress is reduced.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
373114, | |||
4981462, | Feb 21 1989 | Dayco Products, Inc. | Belt construction, rotatable pulley and combination thereof and methods making the same |
5490579, | Jun 10 1994 | PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS, LTD | Tanker access platform |
635454, | |||
6776263, | May 17 2001 | ESW-EXTEL SYSTEMS WEDEL | Elevator system for the vertical transport of loads in an aircraft |
7222697, | Mar 10 2005 | Elevator | |
7562744, | Mar 18 2004 | Kone Corporation | Method for installing an elevator, and elevator delivery assembly |
7757817, | Jan 06 2004 | Inventio AG | Elevator system having a flat belt with wedge-shaped ribs |
7806238, | Jul 12 2004 | Inventio AG | Elevator and pulley assembly for use in an elevator |
7971687, | Feb 07 2003 | Otis Elevator Company; ContiTech Antriebssysteme GmbH | Elevator belt assembly with noise reducing groove arrangement |
20030069101, | |||
20050217944, | |||
20060201749, | |||
DE102006005948, | |||
EP1947048, | |||
WO2008056026, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 23 2009 | Kone Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 28 2011 | HOERLER, MARCO | Kone Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 025850 | /0948 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 03 2015 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 15 2018 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 15 2022 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 23 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 23 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 23 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 23 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 23 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 23 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 23 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 23 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 23 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 23 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 23 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 23 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |