The present system provides a power plant comprising plurality of distinct small displacement engines that are removably coupled to a crankshaft using a clutch system. This allows the power plant to operate both as a small displacement engine, with its inherent fuel efficiency advantages, as well as a large displacement engine, with its advantages in power and torque. The system uses a management system to determine when to activate or deactivate engine modules for maximum efficiency. Because the system does not rely on prior art valve deactivation, the system does not suffer from the frictional losses of the prior art, and greater fuel efficiency is achieved.
|
1. An engine system comprising:
a first engine module permanently coupled to a drive shaft of a vehicle through a transmission;
a plurality of subsequent engine modules removably and axially coupled to the first engine module, via a plurality of clutch assemblies; and
a control system that receives information from the vehicle and that couples or decouples one or more of the subsequent engine modules to or from the first engine module based on the information received from the vehicle.
2. The engine system of
5. The engine system of
a sensor input module that receives the information from the vehicle;
an engine management module that determines an optimum number of cylinders for a current load on the engine system; and
a module controller coupled to the subsequent engine modules that couples or decouples one or more of the subsequent engine modules to or from the first engine module based on commands received from the engine management module.
|
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/552,412 filed on Oct. 27, 2011, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
There are a number of trade-offs in selecting a power source for a vehicle, particularly one that uses an internal combustion engine. Typically, a large displacement multi-cylinder engine (e.g. V-8, V-10, V-12) is employed where applications of high horsepower and/or torque are required or desired. Such engines can provide high power and torque quickly and are useful for rapid acceleration and towing power, among other things. A disadvantage of large-displacement engines is the lack of fuel economy. Such engines typically get lower mileage than small displacement engines (e.g. 2, 4, or 6 cylinder engines). A small displacement engine can provide greater fuel economy, but lacks high power and torque. Consequently, small displacement engines do not allow rapid acceleration, towing capacity, and the like.
One proposed solution for the trade-offs in selecting engine size has been the use of the so-called “variable-displacement” engine. Variable displacement internal combustion engines are known in the art to improve fuel economy by selectively shutting off fuel supply to several cylinders of the engine when reduced power output can operate the vehicle adequately. However, the current techniques used to implement variable-displacement engines create additional disadvantages.
One disadvantage is the technique of valve deactivation used in implementing a variable displacement engine. This reduces the number of active cylinders, but the deactivated cylinders still suffer from frictional losses of the deactivated chambers. Thus, a variable displacement engine operating on four cylinders does not have the same fuel efficiency as a stand-alone four cylinder engine. Therefore, the maximum efficiency of the variable displacement engine is not achieved.
The present system provides a power plant comprising plurality of distinct small displacement engines that are removably coupled to a crankshaft using a clutch system. This allows the power plant to operate both as a small displacement engine, with its inherent fuel efficiency advantages, as well as a large displacement engine, with its advantages in power and torque. The system uses a management system to determine when to activate or deactivate engine modules for maximum efficiency. Because the system does not rely on prior art valve deactivation, the system does not suffer from the frictional losses of the prior art, and greater fuel efficiency is achieved.
The system provides a multi-displacement internal combustion engine comprising a plurality of engine modules that are removably coupled to a crank shaft and controlled by a management system. In one embodiment, each module is coupled to a drive shaft through a magnetic clutch assembly.
Referring to
The remaining modules are each coupled to the drive shaft via a clutch system. As shown, module M2 is removably coupled to the system via clutch assembly C2. Modules M3 and M4 are removable coupled via clutch assemblies C3 and C4 respectively. It is anticipated that the modules will come on and off line in order from M2 to M4, but the system can be operated with any combination of modules M2 to M4 operating in conjunction with module M1.
When a module is deactivated, the clutch assembly removes the module from the drive shaft and the module is shut down. This means that the module no longer receives spark for the cylinders, and, due to the separation from the drive shaft, the camshafts no longer rotate, eliminating frictional energy that the remaining modules must overcome.
In one embodiment, the clutch assemblies are magnetic clutch assemblies. In other embodiments, the clutch assemblies may be fluid clutch assemblies. Any suitable clutch assembly may be used without departing from the scope and spirit of the system.
Although the modules are shown as separate in
At decision block 404 it is determined whether there is a need to add cylinders to reach the optimum cylinder number. If not, the system next checks to see if the system must reduce the number of cylinders to reach the optimum cylinder number. If not, that means that the current number of cylinders is optimum and the system returns to step 401.
If the system determines that the number of cylinders is to be reduced at decision block 405, then the system proceeds to step 406 and applies the cylinder reduction algorithm. In one embodiment the system defines different ranges of operation for cylinder reduction versus cylinder addition. The system also may implement different rules for how many cynlinders can be changed in a single operation. For example, the system may allow the system to drop from 8 cylinders to 4 without an intermediate step, but may require that the system ramp up from 4 cylinders to 6 cylinders and then to 8 cylinders in a condition when the optimum is 8 but the current status is 4. In other embodiments, it may be that greater jumps are permitted when increasing versus decreasing. In other embodiments, the system may have the same restrictions in both directions.
After applying the reduction algorithm at step 406 the system proceeds to step 407 and decouples the appropriate number of motor modules. As note previously, the system may have a certain requirement for which modules are active for a particular 4, or 6 cylinder configuration. If so, the system decoupled the appropriate motor module or modules to satisfy this requirement. The system then returns to step 401.
If the system is to add cylinders at decision block 404, the system proceeds to step 408 and applies the cylinder addition algorithm. The system may define different load ranges when adding cylinders to maximize efficiency and to optimize the comfort of the ride and passengers. At step 409 the system adds the appropriate number of motor modules and returns to step 401 to continue monitoring the engine.
Depending on how many modules are enabled, the firing order of the cylinders can be modified to provide the smoothest and most efficient usage of the available modules. In one embodiment, each module is itself balanced, to ease in the management of the system. In addition, the modules can be brought online and offline in any order.
In another embodiment, one or more of the modules can be replaced with electric motors instead of internal combustion motors to provide hybrid operation of the system. In another embodiment, electric motors are added to the system of
There are a plurality of control systems in the prior art for controlling variable displacement engines and such control systems may be used with the present system.
Thus, a method and apparatus for providing content from a plurality of sources is described.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10526934, | Sep 25 2015 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Cylinder deactivation control and methods |
10563549, | Sep 25 2015 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Cylinder deactivation control and methods |
10619525, | Sep 25 2015 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Cylinder deactivation hydraulic lash adjuster |
11187162, | Aug 17 2016 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Extended coast and controlled deceleration using cylinder deactivation |
11459917, | Sep 25 2015 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Cylinder deactivation energy waste management |
11578672, | Aug 17 2016 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Friction mitigation in cylinder deactivation |
11578673, | Aug 17 2016 | EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED | Transmission control with cylinder deactivation |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
20090133662, | |||
20100180857, | |||
20110246030, | |||
EP1341999, | |||
WO9006424, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 04 2019 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 19 2019 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 14 2018 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 14 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 14 2019 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 14 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 14 2022 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 14 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 14 2023 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 14 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 14 2026 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 14 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 14 2027 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 14 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |