A surface-modified quantum dot luminophore includes a quantum dot luminophore and a coating includes a fluorinated coating including a fluorinated inorganic agent, a fluorinated organic agent, or a combination of fluorinated inorganic and organic agents, the fluorinated coating generating hydrophobic surface sites and the coating is disposed on the surface of the silicate luminophore.

Patent
   9234129
Priority
Aug 14 2010
Filed
Nov 11 2013
Issued
Jan 12 2016
Expiry
Dec 17 2031

TERM.DISCL.
Extension
155 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
64
currently ok
1. A surface-modified quantum dot (qd) luminophore, comprising:
a qd luminophore; and
a fluorinated coating disposed on the qd luminophore and comprising a fluorine-functionalized organosilane having the general formula Si(OR)3X,
wherein R is an alkyl group having one or two carbon atoms, and X is a fluorine-functionalized organic ligand, the fluorinated coating configured to generate hydrophobic surface sites.
2. The surface-modified qd luminophore of claim 1, wherein the qd luminophore comprises a II-VI group compound semiconductor or a III-V group compound semiconductor.
3. The surface-modified qd luminophore of claim 2, wherein:
the II-VI group compound semiconductor comprises CdSe or CdS; and
the III-V group compound semiconductor comprises (Al, In, Ga)P, (Al, In, Ga)As, or (Al, In, Ga)N.
4. The surface-modified qd luminophore of claim 1, wherein the fluorinated coating comprises a surface fixed or cross-linked fluorine ion, or surface fixed or cross-linked fluorine compound.
5. The surface-modified qd luminophore of claim 1, further comprising a moisture barrier layer disposed between the qd luminophore and the fluorinated coating, the moisture barrier layer comprising at least one of:
at least one inorganic material selected from MgO, Al2O3, Y2O3, La2O3, Gd2O3, Lu2O3, SiO2, and corresponding precursors thereof;
at least one semiconductor material having a bandgap wider than that of the qd luminophore; and
at least one organic ligand of an amine, an acid, and SH.
6. The surface-modified qd luminophore of claim 5, wherein the semiconductor material has a lattice mismatch with the qd luminophore and surrounds the qd luminophore.

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/184,271, filed on Jul. 15, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,945,421, and claims priority from and the benefit of German Patent Application No. 10 2010 034 322.6, filed on Aug. 14, 2010, which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.

1. Field of the Invention

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention relate to inorganic luminophores based on doped alkaline earth metal silicate compounds and quantum dot semiconductor compounds which are capable of converting high-energy primary radiation, i.e., for example, ultraviolet (UV) radiation or blue light, to a longer-wavelength secondary radiation within the visible spectral region, which can be used as radiation converters in light-emitting devices such as color or white-light emitting light emitting diodes (LEDs). Exemplary embodiments of the present invention also relate to silicatic inorganic luminophores and quantum dot luminophores which may have improved stability to air humidity and other environmental factors, and increased operational lifetime.

2. Discussion of the Background

Alkaline earth metal silicate luminophores, which include the europium-doped alkaline earth metal orthosilicates, the corresponding oxyorthosilicates and the disilicates of the Ba(Sr)3MgSi2O8:Eu form, have been known for some time. An overview of the classification of the alkaline earth metal silicate compounds is documented by Hollemann-Wiberg, “Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie” Inorganic Chemistry, 102 edition, (Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2007). The preparation and the essential luminescence properties thereof have been described in detail in various patents and publications, for example: U.S. Pat. No. 6,489,716, issued to Tews, et al.; EP Appl. Pub. No. 0550937, applied for by Ouwerkerk, et al.; EP Appl. Pub. No. 0877070, applied for by Hase, et al.; and by W. M. Yen et al., “Phosphor Handbook”, 2nd Ed., CRC Press (2007). These publications indicate that such luminophores have high quantum and radiation yields for the conversion of high-energy radiation to visible light, and numerous representatives of this luminophore class, due to these properties, may be used in products for lighting, illumination, and display technology.

However, the luminophores based on the alkaline earth metal silicates also have various disadvantageous properties. Some of the disadvantages include a comparatively low radiation stability and high sensitivity of the luminophores to water, air humidity, and other environmental factors. The sensitivity depends on the particular composition of the luminophore, structural conditions, and the nature of activator ions of the luminophores. For some of the current applications of wavelength-conversion luminophores, these properties may be problematic. In view of the high lifetime demands, this may apply to LED applications. One known solution is to use suitable technologies and materials to generate (on the surface of pulverulent inorganic luminophores) barrier layers for reducing the influence of water vapour.

These processes may include encapsulation with organic polymers, coating with nanoscale oxides such as SiO2 or Al2O3, or chemical vapour deposition (CVD) of such oxides. However, in relation to silicatic luminophores, the protection achievable may be insufficient to improve the lifetime of corresponding LED lamps to the desired degree. Furthermore, in the case of coated luminophores, it may be necessary to accept losses in brightness, shifts in the color location, and other quality losses. Processes for microencapsulation of the luminophore particles by means of gas phase processes may be inconvenient and costly.

Quantum dots also can be used as luminophores and their wavelengths become shorter as their sizes become smaller. Quantum dots are very reactive due to their small size, and thus, quantum dots have also a comparatively low radiation stability and high sensitivity to water, air humidity, and other environmental factors.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide silicate or quantum dot luminophores that may provide moisture stability, stability to radiation and other environmental influences, and improved operational lifetime.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention also provide luminophores that have been subjected to a surface treatment with fluorinated inorganic or organic agents.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention also provide detectable fixing of finely dispersed fluorides or fluorine compounds on the luminophore surface or the formation of surface networks of such compounds which are capable of making the luminophore surfaces hydrophobic and may cure surface defects.

Additional features of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.

An exemplary embodiment of the present invention discloses a surface-modified silicate luminophore including (a) a silicate luminophore and a coating including at least one of a fluorinated coating including a fluorinated inorganic agent, a fluorinated organic agent, or a combination of a fluorinated inorganic agent and a fluorinated organic agent, the fluorinated coating generating hydrophobic surface sites, and (b) a combination of the fluorinated coating and at least one moisture barrier layer, the moisture barrier layer including MgO, Al2O3, Ln2O3, Y2O3, La2O3, Gd2O3, Lu2O3, and SiO2, or corresponding precursors.

An exemplary embodiment of the present invention discloses a surface-modified quantum dot (QD) luminophore including a QD luminophore and a coating including at least one of a fluorinated coating including a fluorinated inorganic agent, a fluorinated organic agent, or a combination of a fluorinated inorganic agent and a fluorinated organic agent, the fluorinated coating generating hydrophobic surface sites.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.

FIG. 1a is emission spectra of a reference material Sr2.9Ba0.01Ca0.05Eu0.04SiO5, a commercial Sr3SiO5:Eu luminophore, and oxyorthosilicate luminophores F-103, F-202, F-202T, F-320 and F-TS-600 according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 1b is emission spectra of reference material Sr0.876Ba1.024Eu0.1SiO4 and two alkaline earth metal orthosilicate luminophores F-401 and F-401TS according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 2a is electron micrographs of non-fluorinated and fluorinated alkaline earth metal oxyorthosilicate luminophores, showing untreated particles of the luminophore Sr2.9Ba0.01Ca0.05SiO on the left and fluorinated particles of the luminophore F-202 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention on the right.

FIG. 2b includes magnified electron micrographs of the surface of the luminophore F-202 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 are electron micrographs of uncoated, fluorinated, and SiO2-coated alkaline earth metal orthosilicate luminophores of the base lattice composition Sr0.876Ba1.024SiO4:Eu0.1, showing a scanning electron micrograph of the uncoated starting material on the left, the fluorinated luminophore surface in the middle, and a luminophore sample additionally coated with SiO2 on the right according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopic image of the luminophore F-103 with manifested fluorinated surface structure according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an X-ray photoelectron (XPS) spectrum of the luminophore F-103 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a graph showing representative fluorine XPS peaks for different luminophore samples. Curve 1 relates to the mechanical mixture of the luminophore having the composition Sr2.9Ba0.01Ca0.05Eu0.04SiO5 with an amount of NH4F according to working example A1, and curve 2 relates to the fluorine is peak of the fluorinated luminophore F-103 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 depicts a sectional view of a surface modified quantum dot luminophore according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 depicts a sectional view of a surface modified quantum dot luminophore according to another embodiment of the present invention.

The invention is described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which exemplary embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the exemplary embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these exemplary embodiments are provided so that this disclosure is thorough, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. In the drawings, the size and relative sizes of layers and regions may be exaggerated for clarity. Like reference numerals in the drawings denote like elements.

It will be understood that when an element or layer is referred to as being “on” or “connected to” another element or layer, it can be directly on or directly connected to the other element or layer, or intervening elements or layers may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” or “directly connected to” another element or layer, there are no intervening elements or layers present.

On excitation with high-energy UV radiation, blue light, electron beams, X-rays or gamma rays and, depending on their specific chemical composition and the nature of an activator, the luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention may emit visible light and infrared radiation with high radiation yields and significantly improved stability to H2O, air humidity, and other environmental factors compared to the prior art. For this reason, they may be used in long-life industrial products, for example in cathode ray tubes and other image-generating systems (scanning laser beam systems) in X-ray image converters, high-performance light sources, LEDs of all colors for interior and exterior illumination, backlighting of LCD displays, solar cells, greenhouse films, and glasses as radiation converters.

Luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, including surface-modified silicate luminophores, may be characterized in that the surface thereof has a coating of fluorinated inorganic or organic agents for generation of hydrophobic surface sites, or of a combination of the fluorinated coating with one or more moisture barrier layers composed of layer-forming materials such as the oxides MgO, Al2O3, Ln2O3 (wherein Ln=Y, La, Gd, or Lu) and SiO2, or the corresponding precursors, or sol-gel technologies.

Luminophores, including surface-modified silicate luminophores, according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention may include pulverulent alkaline earth metal silicate luminophores. The surface-modified silicate luminophores may have the general formula:
(Me1+Me2+Me3+)x·(Si,P,Al,B,V,Ge)y·(O,N,C)z:(A,F,S)

where A is an activator selected from the group of the lanthanoids or manganese; F represents the fluorinated coating that comprises surface fixed and optionally cross-linked fluorine ions, or surface fixed or cross-linked fluorine compounds; and S characterizes an optional additional coating with non-fluorinated layer-forming materials as the moisture barrier layer. Me1+ is a monovalent metal, Me2+ is a divalent metal and Me3+ is a trivalent metal selected from group III of the Periodic Table or from the lanthanoids. Some of the silicon may be replaced by P, Al, B, V, or Ge. N and C may be incorporated into the crystal as anions. The coefficients x, y, and z may have the following ranges: 0<x<5, 0<y<12, and 0<z<24.

According to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, which may optimize luminescence properties and stability performance, some of the alkaline earth metal ions in the surface-modified silicate luminophores may be replaced by further divalent ions, for example Mg, Zn, or, with implementation of suitable measures for balancing the charge, monovalent or trivalent cations from the group of alkali metals or of the rare earths. Further, P, Al, B, V, or Ge can be incorporated into an anion sublattice of the surface-modified silicate luminophores replacing some of the silicon. N and C may be incorporated into the crystal as anions.

According to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the alkaline earth metal silicate luminophores may be fluorinated using fluorine-functionalized organosilanes of the Si(OR)3X form where R═CH3, C2H5, . . . , and X=a F-functionalized organic ligand, and controlled hydrolysis and condensation may achieve the formation of a fluorinated barrier layer on a silicatic luminophore matrix, which may be a barrier and may also have hydrophobic properties.

The surface-modified silicate luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, may be characterized by the general formula:
Sr3-x-y-zCaxBaySiO5:Euz,F,S

wherein 0≦x≦2, 0≦y≦2 and 0<z<0.5. The surface-modified silicate luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, may also be characterized by the formula:
Sr3-x-y-zCaxBaySiO5:Euz,F,S

wherein 0≦x≦0.05, 0≦y≦0.5 and 0<z<0.25.

Luminophore powders used as the basis for the preparation of the surface-modified luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be synthesized by multistage high-temperature solid-state reactions at temperatures above 1000° C. between the alkaline earth metal carbonates that may be used as the starting material or the corresponding metal oxides and SiO2. Additionally, mineralization additives (e.g. NH4Cl, NH4F, or alkali metal or alkaline earth metal halides or halides of the trivalent metals) may be added to the reaction mixture to promote reactivity and to control the particle size distribution of the resulting luminophores. Depending on the specific selection of the stoichiometric ratios, it may be possible to produce the desired compositions of the doped alkaline earth metal silicate luminophores, more particularly the corresponding ortho- and oxyortho-silicate luminophores.

Accordingly, the calculated amounts of the starting materials are mixed vigorously and then subjected to a multistage calcination process in an inert or reducing atmosphere within the desired temperature range. For the purpose of optimizing the luminophore properties, the main calcination process may optionally also have several calcination stages within different temperature ranges. After the calcination process has ended, the samples are cooled to room temperature and subjected to suitable aftertreatment processes that are directed, for example, to the elimination of flux residues, to the minimization of surface defects, or else to the tine adjustment of the particle size distribution. Instead of the silicon oxide, it is alternatively also possible to use silicon nitride (Si3N4) or other silicon-containing precursors as reactants for the reaction with the alkaline earth metal compounds used. The synthesis of the polycrystalline luminophore powders used for the production of exemplary embodiments of the luminophores is not restricted to the preparation processes described above.

For the fluorination of the surfaces of the pulverulent alkaline earth metal silicate luminophores according to the present invention, different inorganic fluorine compounds may be used such as alkali metal fluorides (e.g. LiF, NaF, KF) alkaline earth metal fluorides (MgF2, CaF2, SrF2, BaF2), AlF3 and fluorides of the rare earths (e.g. YF3, LaF3 or GdF3), NH4F and NH4HF2, and also other inorganic or organic fluorine compounds (e.g. fluoride-containing amines). The materials selected are mixed with the silicatic luminophore powders, in which case aqueous suspensions may be employed. The required proportions of the fluorinating agents added depend on the solubility of the compounds and on the reaction conditions (pH, temperature, intensity of mixing, residence time, etc.) and may be determined experimentally.

After the surface treatment has ended, the fluorinated luminophores are removed from the suspension, and may be washed with suitable solvents and then dried at temperatures between 80° C. and 200° C. After cooling and screening, they are in a form ready for use.

For the achievement of optimal luminophore properties, depending on the specific composition of the inventive luminophores, on the type and amount of the fluorinating agents used, and further factors, to subject the luminophores produced in accordance with the invention, additionally or instead of the drying process, to a thermal aftertreatment (heat treatment) within a temperature range from 300° C. to 600° C. in a reducing atmosphere. Detailed information regarding the production of the luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention is given hereinafter by several working examples.

Working Example A1 describes the preparation of a luminophore provided with a fluorinated surface layer and having the base lattice composition Sr2.9Ba0.01Ca0.05SiO5:Eu0.04 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, which is described as sample F-103 together with its optical data in Table 1, and the emission spectrum that is designated as “3” in FIG. 1a.

Table 1 contains optical and moisture stability data of europium-activated strontium oxyorthosilicate luminophore samples which have been treated with different amounts of NH4F. To synthesize the corresponding luminophore matrix, the stoichiometric amounts of SrCO3, BaCO3, CaCO3, Eu2O3, and SiO2 and 0.2 mol of NH4Cl are mixed vigorously and then subjected, in corundum crucibles, to a 5-hour calcination process at 1400° C. in an N2/H2 atmosphere containing 2% hydrogen. After the calcination process has ended, the calcinated material is homogenized, ground and washed with H2O, Subsequently, 100 g of the dried and screened luminophore are introduced together with 1.1 g of NH4F, 200 g of glass beads and 1 liter of water into a suitable plastic vessel and mixed vigorously on a jar mill at low speed for 30 minutes. After a settling time of several minutes, the supernatant is first decanted and then filtered with suction through a Büchner funnel. This is followed by drying and screening of the end product.

To prepare the luminophore containing sample F-202 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the optical data of which are specified in Table 2 and the emission spectrum of which is designated as “4” in FIG. 1a, 100 g of the luminophore matrix described in Working Example A1 are mixed with 2.474 g of NH4HF2. Table 2 contains optical and moisture stability data of europium-activated strontium oxyorthcsilicate luminophore samples which have been treated with different amounts of NH4HF2. In this case, the fluorinated surface layer is applied by wet-chemical precipitation by taking the mixture in 1 L of deionized water and 400 g of glass beads on a roll mill. Treatment for one hour is followed by the removal of the coated luminophore from the solution and an after-treatment analogous to Working Example A1.

Here, 30 g of the luminophore produced according to Working Example A2 are heat treated in a corundum crucible at 400° C. in an N2/H2 atmosphere containing 35% hydrogen for 60 minutes. After cooling, the sample F-202T, the optical data of which are specified in Table 2 and the emission spectrum of which is designated as “5” in FIG. 1a, is homogenized by screening to produce an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

An oxyorthosilicate luminophore with a base lattice composition Sr2.948Ba0.01Cu0.002SiO5:Eu0.04 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is synthesized in the solid state according to Working Example A1 and coated with an SiO2 network using precursor material tetraethoxysilane (TEOS). For this purpose, 50 g of the luminophore are mixed with 500 mL of a solution of 1 L of ethanol, 18.2 g of TEOS and 100 mL of 32% aqueous ammonia, and stirred in a reaction vessel for 2 hours. Thereafter, the coated luminophore is filtered with suction, washed with ethanol, and dried at 160° C. for 24 hours.

After this preparative surface treatment, the luminophore is subjected, as in Working Example A1, to fluorination by NH4F as the fluorinating agent. For this purpose, 80 g of the precoated luminophore is reacted with 1.98 g of NH4F under the conditions of Working Example A1. The luminophore according to the present exemplary embodiment is thus produced, in the form of sample F-TS-600. The optical data of which are described in Table 6, and the emission spectrum of which is designated as “7” in FIG. 1a, like the luminophore described in Working Examples A1, A2, and A3, and may have a significantly improved moisture resistance compared to conventional oxyorthosilicate luminophores and the same base lattice composition as the uncoated base luminophores. The performance characteristics of these luminophores according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are compiled in Tables 1, 2 and 6.

For the production of the luminophore according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention in the form of sample F-320, a base lattice of the composition Sr2.9485Ba0.01Cu0.0015SiO5:Eu0.04 is synthesized. For this purpose, the stoichiometric amounts of SrCO3, BaCO3, CuO, Eu2O3, 65 g of SiO2 and 0.3 mol of NH4Cl are mixed, introduced into suitable calcining crucibles and calcined in a high-temperature furnace for a period of 24 hours. The calcination program has two main calcination zones at 1200° C. and 1350° C. for 3 hours at each temperature. During the first calcination phase, calcination is effected under forming gas with hydrogen concentration 5%, and the hydrogen concentration is increased to 20% in the subsequent second phase of calcination.

The cooling, washing and homogenization of the matrix material are followed by the fluorination of the luminophore surface. To this end, the fluorinating agent used is aluminium fluoride AlF3 instead of the NH4F or the NH4HF2. For interaction with the surface of the luminophore particles, 1.2 g of AlF3 are introduced into 1 L of H2O at 60° C. and the mixture is stirred vigorously for 1 hour. Subsequently, 100 g of the luminophore matrix synthesized are added to the suspension. The reaction time may be 60 minutes. The coated luminophore in the form of sample F-320 is after-treated similarly to Working Examples A1, A2, A3, and A4. The optical data are shown in Table 3, and the emission spectrum thereof is designated as “6” in FIG. 1a. Table 3 contains optical and stability data of further fluorinated Eu2+-doped strontium oxyorthosilicate luminophores.

The working examples which follow relate to alkaline earth metal orthosilicate luminophores coated in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention and having a composition of Sr0.876Ba1.024SiO4:Eu0.1. In the present exemplary embodiment, the base material is produced by a high-temperature solid-state reaction wherein the starting mixture comprises stoichiometric amounts of SrCO3, BaCO3, Eu2O3, SiO2, and 0.2 mol of NH4Cl.

The calcination process includes heating the crucible filled with the starting mixture to 1275° C. in a nitrogen atmosphere, maintaining this temperature over a period of 10 hours and subsequently cooling to room temperature. On attainment of the high-temperature ramp, 20% hydrogen is added to the protective gas. After cooling, the resulting materials are subjected to washing to remove flux residues, and then dried and screened.

For fluorination of the base material, 150 g of the luminophore powder and 4.268 g of NH4F are suspended in 3 L of H2O and stirred over a period of 2 hours. After the coating procedure has ended, the fluorinated luminophore is filtered with suction to give sample F-401, washed with ethanol on the suction filter, and dried at 130° C. for 24 hours. The optical data of sample F-401 are shown in Table 4, and F-401's emission spectrum is designated as “3” in FIG. 1b. Table 4 contains optical and stability data of fluorinated green-wavelength emitting alkaline earth metal orthosilicate luminophores that have additionally been coated with SiO2.

In a further step, the luminophore according to the present exemplary embodiment in the form of sample F-401 may be provided with an SiO2 coating. For this purpose, 50 g of the fluorinated Sr0.876Ba1.024SiO4:Eu0.1 luminophore powder are added to 500 mL of TEOS solution consisting of 1 L of ethanol, 25 g of TEOS and 150 mL of 32% aqueous ammonia, which has been prepared 24 hours before use. After a stifling time of 5 hours, reaction is terminated. The surface-coated luminophore in the form of sample F-401TS is filtered with suction, washed with ethanol again, and dried. The optical data of the sample F-401TS are specified in Table 4, F-401TS's emission spectrum is designated as “4” in FIG. 1b.

The emission spectra of the fluorinated luminophores of different matrix composition compared to the luminophores untreated in each case are described in FIG. 1a and FIG. 1b, which show that the luminescence intensities of the luminophores with fluorinated surface structure according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention differ slightly from those of the reference material. This is also confirmed by the luminescence data of the luminophore samples according to exemplary embodiments compiled in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, and Table 7 while somewhat lower luminescence intensities were measured in some cases for fluorinated and optionally additionally SiO2 coated samples. There are also examples in the tables referred to for surface treatment leading to a slight increase in luminescence efficiency. The latter effect may be attributed to the somewhat better emission of light in the case of the coated materials.

In FIG. 2a and FIG. 2b, electron micrographs of a fluorinated Sr3SiO5:Eu luminophore according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention are compared to those of the untreated starting material. These micrographs demonstrate that the surface treatment, described in the working examples, with suitable fluorinating agents leads to the formation of specific surface structures, which can be visualized with the aid of scanning electron micrographs.

The situation is comparable for the electron micrographs shown in FIG. 3 for green-wavelength light-emitting alkaline earth metal orthosilicate luminophores. The micrographs in FIG. 3 show the characteristic particle surface of an untreated luminophore sample, that of the fluorinated material produced in accordance with the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, and that of a further sample derived from the starting material, which had additionally been coated with SiO2.

At the same time, it becomes clear from the results of corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses shown in FIG. 4 that the surface structures contain fluorine. In addition to the peaks for strontium (Sr), silicon (Si) and oxygen (O), which are characteristic of the luminophore matrix, pronounced singular reflections with significant peak height are found in the EDX spectra of the luminophores fluorinated in accordance with the invention, which must be assigned unambiguously to the element fluorine (F) on the basis of the peak's energy position. In addition, the spectrum shown also contains reflections designated as gold (Au) and palladium (Pd), which result from coating the luminophore sample with gold and palladium for reasons related to analysis methodology.

Further evidence for the fixing of finely dispersed fluorides or of fluorine compounds or for the formation of networks of such compounds on the surface of the luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention is documented in FIG. 5 and FIG. 6 by the results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses. Fixing may include adsorption and like means for chemisorption or physisorption. The XPS spectrum, shown in FIG. 5, of a luminophore of base lattice composition Sr2.9Ba0.01Ca0.05Eu0.04SiO5 treated with NH4F according to Working Example 1 shows that it is also possible with this solid-state analysis method to detect the element fluorine (F) as a constituent of the surface structures of the fluorinated luminophores. Further conclusions may also be drawn from the XPS spectrum. For example, it is evident from the comparison of the internally calibrated XPS spectra of the NH4F-fluorinated oxyorthosilicate luminophore (curve 2 in FIG. 6) with that of a sample of a mechanical mixture of the corresponding luminophore matrix with an equivalent amount of NH4F (curve 1 of FIG. 6) that the F 1s peaks determined in each case have different intensities and also exhibit a shift in binding energy relative to one another as shown in FIG. 6.

The lower intensity of the F 1s peak of the sample labeled as curve 2 can be interpreted as loss of some of the added fluorine from the luminophore surface during processing. The shift in the F is peak to lower binding energies of curve 1 may indicate formation of a chemical bond between the applied fluorinating agent and the surface of the luminophore matrix.

In Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6, several luminescence parameters of different silicatic luminophores configured in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention and the results of the stability tests are compiled and compared with those of the unchanged (i.e., non-fluorinated surface) luminophore powders and in some cases with those of commercial comparative luminophores. Table 5 contains optical and stability data of fluorinated and of fluorinated and SiO2-coated Eu2+-coated strontium oxyorthosilicate luminophores. Table 6 contains optical and stability data of SiO2-coated strontium oxyorthosilicate luminophores that have been fluorinated.

The moisture stability of the materials was assessed by storage of the corresponding luminophore samples in a climate-controlled cabinet, which was operated at a temperature of 85° C. and 85% air humidity, for seven days. Subsequently, the luminophores were dried at 150° C. for 24 hours and then subjected to a comparative measurement of the luminescence yield.

The results of the comparative luminescence measurements demonstrate that both the luminescence efficiencies of the luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention and the temperature dependencies thereof are equal to those of commercial europium-activated alkaline earth metal oxyorthosilicate or corresponding orthosilicate luminophores, or even exceed them. Secondly, the results of the stability tests show that the luminophores according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention with fluorinated surface structure and optional additional SiO2 coating, as shown in Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6, have significantly improved moisture resistances compared to unchanged (i.e. non-fluorinated surface) luminophores of the same matrix composition.

As discussed above, silicate luminophores are surface modified with a coating including, for example, a fluorinated coating. However, the application of the fluorinated coating is not limited to the silicate luminophores. The fluorinated coating can also be applied to quantum dot luminophores. Semiconductor quantum dot luminophores convert high energy radiation into visible light, based on their band gap structure. In addition, quantum dot luminophores are very reactive due to their small size, and thus, quantum dots have also a comparatively low radiation stability and high sensitivity to water, air humidity, and other environmental factors.

FIG. 7 and FIG. 8 depict sectional views of surface modified quantum dot (QD) luminophores 10 and 10a, according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 7, the surface modified QD luminophore 10 comprises a QD luminophore 11 and a coating disposed on the surface of the QD luminophore 11. The coating may comprise a moisture barrier layer 13 and a fluorinated coating 15.

The QD luminophore 11 comprises a II-VI or III-V group compound semiconductor QD luminophore. The II-VI group compound semiconductor QD luminophore may comprise CdSe or CdS, and the III-V group compound semiconductor QD luminophore may comprise (Al, In, Ga)P, (Al, In, Ga)As, or (Al, In, Ga)N, but the invention is not limited thereto.

The moisture barrier layer 13 may comprise at least one of at least one inorganic material of MgO, Al2O3, Y2O3, La2O3, Gd2O3, Lu2O3, SiO2, and the corresponding precursors, at least one semiconductor material layer having a bandgap wider than that of the QD luminophore, and at least one organic ligand of an amine, an acid and SH. The moisture barrier layer 13 may be a single layer or multi-layers formed of different ones of the above materials.

The inorganic materials are similar to the inorganic moisture barrier layer materials discussed in the previous embodiments, and detailed descriptions thereof are omitted. The moisture barrier layer 13 including the semiconductor material may be a shell surrounding the QD luminophore 11. The semiconductor material has a lattice mismatch with the QD luminophore 11. The larger the lattice mismatch therebetween, the higher the conversion efficiency of the surface modified luminophore 10. A buffer layer 12 may be applied between the QD luminophore 11 and the moisture barrier layer 13, as shown in FIG. 8. In the case of CdS or CdSe QD luminophore, the semiconductor material may be, for example, ZnS, and the buffer layer 12 may be ZnCdS or ZnCdSe. The moisture barrier layer 13 may also be formed to have the semiconductor material with the organic ligand of an amine, acid, or SH.

The fluorinated coating 15 is similar to the fluorinated coating described above in the previous embodiments. The fluorinated coating 15 may comprise a fluorinated inorganic agent, a fluorinated organic agent, or a combination of a fluorinated inorganic agent and a fluorinated organic agent. The fluorinated coating 15 generates hydrophobic surface sites.

The fluorinated coating 15 may comprise fluorine ions or fluorine compounds that are surface fixed or cross linked. An optional additional coating 16 including non-fluorinated layer-forming materials can be applied to the fluorinated coating, as shown in FIG. 8.

According to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the QD luminophores may be fluorinated using fluorine-functionalized organosilanes having formula Si(OR)3X, where R═CH3, C2H5, . . . , and X=a F-functionalized organic ligand. Controlled hydrolysis and condensation may achieve the formation of a fluorinated barrier layer on a QD luminophore matrix, which may be a barrier and may also have hydrophobic properties. In addition, the moisture barrier layer 13 may be formed on the QD luminophore before forming the fluorinated barrier layer thereon.

The fluorination of the surfaces of the QD luminophores is similar to the fluorination of the surfaces of the pulverulent alkaline earth metal silicate luminophores. However, the moisture barrier layer 13 may be formed before the fluorination of the surfaces of the QD luminophores, in order to prevent surface reactions of the QD luminophores.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variation can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

TABLE 1
Intensity
after
Half- Intensity climate-
Color height at 150° C. controlled
Composition of the Sample Fluorinating Proportion Intensity coordinates width I150/I25 chamber test
luminophore matrix No. agent [%] L [%] x y [nm] [%] Ibefore/Iafter [%]
Sr3SiO5:Eu commercial 97.6 0.5420 0.4560 68.8 91.3 71.7
Sr2.9Ba0.01Ca0.05Eu0.04SiO5 Starting material for 100 0.5462 0.4518 71.0 92.7 92.3
fluorination tests
F-100 NH4F 2.5 99.1 0.5459 0.4522 70.6 92.4 93.4
F-101 NH4F 5
F-102 NH4F 7.5
F-103 NH4F 10
additionally heat-treated samples (1 hour, 400° C., 35% H2)
F-100T NH4F 2.5 97.3 0.5457 0.4524 70.7 92.1 93.1
F-101T NH4F 5 98.3 0.5453 0.4527 70.9 92.8 94.7
F-102T NH4F 7.5 97.2 0.5454 0.4525 71.1 92.3 103.7
F-103T NH4F 10 98.3 0.5456 0.4525 70.9 92.7 102.3

TABLE 2
Intensity after
Half- Intensity climate-
Color height at 150° C. controlled
Composition of the Sample Fluorinating Proportion Intensity coordinates width I150/I25 chamber test
luminophore matrix No. agent [%] L [%] x y [nm] [%] Ibefore/Iafter [%]
Sr3SiO5:Eu commercial 97.6 0.5420 0.4560 68.8 91.3 71.7
Sr2.9Ba0.01Ca0.05Eu0.04SiO5 Starting material for 100 0.5462 0.4518 71.0 92.7 92.3
fluorination tests
F-200 NH4HF2 2.5 98.8 0.5459 0.4521 70.6 93.1 93.4
F-201 NH4HF2 5 99.2 0.5455 0.4525 70.9 92.6 94.9
F-202 NH4HF2 7.5 99.4 0.5459 0.4521 70.8 91.9 98.7
F-203 NH4HF2 10 98.8 0.5457 0.4522 70.9 92.3 98.9
additionally heat-treated samples (1 h, 400° C., 35% H2)
F-200T NH4HF2 2.5 97.3 0.5458 0.4523 70.6 92.7 103.3
F-201T NH4HF2 5 98.3 0.5456 0.4525 71.1 92.1 102.6
F-202T NH4HF2 7.5 97.2 0.5454 0.4520 71.1 92.1 102.7
F-203T NH4HF2 10 98.3 0.5455 0.4526 70.9 92.5 102.0

TABLE 3
Intensity after
climate-controlled
Composition of the Sample Fluorinating Proportion Intensity Color coordinates chamber test
luminophore matrix No. agent [%] L [%] x y Ibefore/Iafter [%]
Sr3SiO5:Eu commercial 97.6 0.5420 0.4560 71.7
Sr2.9485Ba0.01Cu0.0015Eu0.04SiO5 Starting material for 100 83.6
fluorination tests
F-300 LiF 5 99.1 0.5373 0.4604 93.3
F-301 + 10 98.5 0.5381 0.4598 91.9
F-310 BaF2 1 97.8 0.5374 0.4598 93.6
F-311 + 5 98.2 0.5380 0.4521 89.0
F-320 AlF3 5 98.8 0.5371 0.4606 99.2
F-321 + 10 98.2 0.5407 0.4572 94.2
additionally heat-treated samples (1 h, 400° C., 35% H2)
F-300T LiF 5 99.0 0.5372 0.4505 95.1
F-310T BaF2 1 98.0 0.5371 0.4607 95.7
F-320T AlF3 5 99.1 0.5368 0.4608 99.4

TABLE 4
Intensity after
climate-
controlled
Composition of the Sample Proportion Intensity Color coordinates chamber test
luminophore matrix No. Fluorination [%] Coating L [%] x y Ibefore/Iafter [%]
Sr0.876Ba1.024Eu0.1SiO4 Starting material for 100 0.2943 0.6298 83.6
fluorination tests
F-400 NH4F 10 99.5 0.2938 0.6300 97.9
F-400TS NH4F 10 TEOS 99.1 0.2933 0.6294 98.9
F-401 NH4F 20 99.8 0.2942 0.6297 96.6
F-401TS NH4F 20 TEOS 100.7 0.2935 0.6298 98.7
F-402 NH4FHF2 10 99.2 0.2938 0.6299 98.2
F-402TS NH4FHF2 10 TEOS 100.4 0.2932 0.6302 99.5
F-403 NH4FHF2 20 100.0 0.2941 0.6302 99.7
F-403TS NH4FHF2 20 TEOS 101.4 0.2940 0.6307 100.1

TABLE 5
Intensity after
climate-controlled
Luminophore Sample Proportion Intensity Color coordinates chamber test
composition No. Fluorination [%] Coating L [%] x y Ibefore/Iafter [%]
Sr2.935Ba0.015Eu0.05SiO5 98.2 0.5422 0.4565 72.3
100 0.5386 0.4592 78.4
F-500 NH4F 10 98.0 0.5383 0.4594 91.6
F-500TS NH4F 10 TEOS 93.9 0.5372 0.4604 101.1
F-501 NH4F 20 97.2 0.5382 0.4594 97.1
F-501TS NH4F 20 TEOS 93.3 0.5372 0.4605 101.5
F-502 NH4HF2 10 97.8 0.5387 0.4591 97.3
F-502TS NH4HF2 10 TEOS 93.2 0.5374 0.4601 101.8
F-503 NH4HF2 20 95.1 0.5383 0.4595 99.5
F-503TS NH4HF2 20 TEOS 93.0 0.5376 0.4699 100.7

TABLE 6
Intensity after
climate-controlled
Luminophore Sample Proportion Intensity Color coordinates chamber test
composition No. Coating Fluorination [%] L [%] x y Ibefore/Iafter [%]
Sr3SiO5:Eu commercial 98.3 0.5319 0.4563 69.3
Sr2.948Ba0.01Cu0.002Eu0.04SiO5 Original 100 0.5462 0.4514 92.0
TS-600 TEOS 101.7 0.5465 0.4515 96.8
F-TS-600 TEOS NH4F 20 100.6 0.5458 0.4522 102.7
TS-601 TEOS 98.5 0.5456 0.4523 98.4
F-TS-601 TEOS NH4F 20 97.6 0.5452 0.4528 103.4

Starick, Detlef, Roth, Gundula, Tews, Walter, Lee, Chung Hoon

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
5792509, Feb 07 1997 CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL HK LIMITED Phosphor particle with antireflection coating
6489716, Feb 16 1998 Merck Patent GmbH Compact, energy-saving lamp
7065285, Dec 01 2003 RPX Corporation Polymeric compositions comprising quantum dots, optical devices comprising these compositions and methods for preparing same
7161298, May 17 2002 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD Plasma display unit
7629620, Sep 03 2001 Panasonic Corporation Light-emitting semiconductor device, light-emitting system and method for fabricating light-emitting semiconductor device
7922937, Aug 04 2004 Intematix Corporation Two-phase silicate-based yellow phosphor
8581286, Aug 14 2010 SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO , LTD ; LITEC-LP GMBH Light emitting device having surface-modified silicate luminophores
8734762, Oct 18 2007 Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology Perfluorocarbon nano-emulsion containing quantum dot nanoparticles and method for preparing the same
20030173540,
20040239247,
20050227077,
20070001585,
20070125984,
20070217755,
20070232181,
20080023721,
20080135862,
20080230795,
20090134775,
20090218581,
20090289546,
20100142189,
20100207132,
20110068321,
20110101387,
20120037850,
20120193579,
20120299032,
20140061503,
CN101072844,
CN101586025,
EP1124913,
EP2554628,
EP550937,
EP877070,
JP10125240,
JP2002069442,
JP2002329895,
JP2003041247,
JP2004143408,
JP2005003436,
JP2005068343,
JP2005187797,
JP2006036943,
JP2006232949,
JP2006286672,
JP2007186674,
JP2007302799,
JP2008050379,
JP2009013186,
JP2009055043,
JP2009132902,
JP2009280664,
JP2009526089,
JP2011111506,
JP52156188,
JP5222584,
KR1020090023092,
KR1020090040097,
WO2006061747,
WO2010060437,
WO2011045359,
WO2009051337,
WO2012134629,
//////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 11 2013Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Nov 11 2013LITEC-LP GMBH(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jan 17 2014LEE, CHUNG HOONSEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO , LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327760834 pdf
Jan 17 2014LEE, CHUNG HOONLITEC-LP GMBHASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327760834 pdf
Feb 21 2014TEWS, WALTERSEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO , LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327760834 pdf
Feb 21 2014ROTH, GUNDULASEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO , LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327760834 pdf
Feb 21 2014ROTH, GUNDULALITEC-LP GMBHASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327760834 pdf
Feb 21 2014TEWS, WALTERLITEC-LP GMBHASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327760834 pdf
Feb 24 2014STARICK, DETLEFSEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO , LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327760834 pdf
Feb 24 2014STARICK, DETLEFLITEC-LP GMBHASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327760834 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jul 05 2016ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Jun 07 2019M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jun 19 2023M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jan 12 20194 years fee payment window open
Jul 12 20196 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 12 2020patent expiry (for year 4)
Jan 12 20222 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jan 12 20238 years fee payment window open
Jul 12 20236 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 12 2024patent expiry (for year 8)
Jan 12 20262 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jan 12 202712 years fee payment window open
Jul 12 20276 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 12 2028patent expiry (for year 12)
Jan 12 20302 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)