An apparatus for dispersing particles within a molten material in a mold-less casting process comprises a primary electromagnet for generating an AC magnetic field and a secondary electromagnet adjacent to the primary electromagnet for generating an independent DC magnetic field. Each of the primary and secondary electromagnets comprises a coil and at least one of the electromagnets is positioned about a common longitudinal axis. A heat source may be positioned at a first end of the common longitudinal axis for forming a melt to be exposed to the AC and DC magnetic fields, and a particle injection device is positioned at one or more positions about the common longitudinal axis for injecting particles into the melt during magnetic field exposure. The apparatus does not include a solid body for containing the melt prior to solidification.
|
11. A method of dispersing particles in a molten material in a mold-less casting process, the method comprising:
forming a molten mass of material unsupported by a mold or other solid body, the material including a plurality of particles dispersed therein;
applying a gradient electromagnetic pressure and an oscillatory electromagnetic pressure to the molten mass of material, the gradient electromagnetic pressure being non-oscillatory and being varied over at least a portion of the molten mass, thereby constraining the molten mass of material to a predetermined shape while the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure promotes mixing of the particles in the molten mass; and
solidifying the molten mass of material, thereby forming a particle-reinforced casting with enhanced surface and/or bulk properties.
1. A method of dispersing particles in a molten material in a mold-less casting process, the method comprising:
forming a molten mass of material unsupported by a mold or other solid body;
applying a gradient electromagnetic pressure and an oscillatory electromagnetic pressure to the molten mass, the gradient electromagnetic pressure being non-oscillatory and being varied over at least a portion of the molten mass;
injecting particles into a surface region of the molten mass as the gradient and oscillatory electromagnetic pressures are being applied, the gradient electromagnetic pressure constraining the molten mass of material to a predetermined shape while the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure promotes mixing of the particles in the surface region; and
solidifying the molten mass of material after injecting and mixing the particles, thereby forming a particle-reinforced casting with enhanced surface and/or bulk properties.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
wherein the DC magnetic field comprises a field strength of from about 1 Tesla to about 30 Tesla.
6. The method of
wherein the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure is expressed mathematically as Bdc(Bac(z)/μ)sin(ωt)+([Bac(z)]2/2μ)cos(2ωt), where p is permeability in free space, Bac(z) is field strength of the AC magnetic field, Bdc(z) is field strength of the DC magnetic field, t is time, and ω=2πf, where f is frequency of the AC magnetic field.
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
|
The present disclosure is related generally to molten material processing and more particularly to electromagnetic casting technology.
Electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) technology has been applied to molten metals to achieve non-contact heating and/or mixing of the melt. As described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 7,534,980, a molten metal may be contained in a mold or crucible and exposed to time-varying and static magnetic fields to induce a large oscillatory electromagnetic force, or pressure, on the sample. The induced acoustic driving force is bi-directional, alternately compressing and stretching the sample, promoting mixing, cavitation and heating of the melt. However, at high static magnetic fields, the amplitude of the oscillations may be so high that excessive heating and stressing of the sample occurs, leading to contamination of the melt with the mold material and/or fracturing of the mold during EMAT processing. Alternately, mold-melt interactions can be a direct result of basic thermodynamics leading to reaction and potential undesirable dissolution of elemental constituents from the mold and subsequent solution or precipitation of those in the melt, causing unexpected or unwanted chemistry changes. Another mechanism is the forceful erosion of the mold material aided by the EMAT excitation-produced melt cavitation process and subsequent bubble collapsing, which may ablate mold material into the melt. It would be advantageous to develop a method of molten material processing that allowed heating and non-contact mixing to occur without risk of contamination from a mold, or other problems.
An apparatus and a method for dispersing particles within a molten material in a mold-less casting process have been developed.
The apparatus comprises a primary electromagnet for generating an AC magnetic field and a secondary electromagnet adjacent to the primary electromagnet for generating an independent DC magnetic field. Each of the primary and secondary electromagnets comprises a coil and at least one of the electromagnets may be positioned about a common longitudinal axis. A heat source may be positioned at a first end of the common longitudinal axis for forming a melt to be exposed to the AC and DC magnetic fields, and a particle injection device is positioned at one or more positions about the common longitudinal axis for injecting particles into the melt during magnetic field exposure. The apparatus does not include a solid body for containing the melt prior to solidification, as the AC magnetic field generated by the primary electromagnet is configured to supply a gradient electromagnetic pressure to contain the melt.
The method comprises, according to one embodiment, forming a molten mass of material unsupported by a mold or other solid body, and applying a gradient electromagnetic pressure and an oscillatory electromagnetic pressure to the molten mass. The gradient electromagnetic pressure is non-oscillatory and is varied over at least a portion of the molten mass. Particles are injected into a surface region of the molten mass as the gradient and oscillatory electromagnetic pressures are applied. The gradient electromagnetic pressure constrains the molten mass of material to a predetermined shape, while the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure promotes mixing of the particles in the surface region. After injecting and mixing the particles, the molten mass of material is solidified, thereby forming a particle-reinforced casting with enhanced surface properties and/or improved bulk properties.
The method comprises, according to another embodiment, forming a molten mass of material unsupported by a mold or other solid body, where the molten mass of material includes a plurality of particles dispersed therein. A gradient electromagnetic pressure and an oscillatory electromagnetic pressure are applied to the molten mass of material. The gradient electromagnetic pressure is non-oscillatory and is varied over at least a portion of the molten mass, thereby constraining the molten mass of material to a predetermined shape, while the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure promotes mixing of the particles in the molten column. The molten mass of material is then solidified, thereby forming a particle-reinforced casting with enhanced surface and/or bulk properties.
The apparatus and method described herein allows electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) processing to be applied to a mold-less continuous or batch casting process without any contact between the melt and a solid surface during solidification. Instead, the molten material may be supported by the energy density, or pressure, of an applied AC magnetic field. Without a mold, the surface of the molten material may be directly accessed during casting to produce uniform or gradient dispersion composites with enhanced surface properties.
A cross-sectional schematic of an exemplary apparatus for dispersing particles within a molten material in a continuous or batch casting process is illustrated in
Also as shown in
It is contemplated that other configurations of the electromagnets 102,104 may be possible, such as positioning the secondary electromagnet 104 inside the primary electromagnet 102, assuming different magnet sizes than shown in
The apparatus 100 may comprise a heat source 108 for forming a melt to be processed by the AC and DC magnetic fields generated by the primary and secondary electromagnets 102,104. In some cases, the heat source 108 may be positioned at a first end of the common longitudinal axis 106 (e.g., where material to be melted is introduced). More specifically, the heat source 108 may be positioned outside one or both of the primary and secondary electromagnets 102,104. Alternatively, the heat source 108 may be positioned inside one or both of the primary and secondary electromagnets 102,104. It is also possible that the heat source may be positioned at a remote location away from the apparatus 100, and the material to be processed by the electromagnets 102,104 may be transferred to the apparatus while in the molten state.
The heat source 108 may partially or fully surround a batch sample or a continuous feed of solid material and may melt at least a portion of the solid material for processing by the primary and secondary electromagnets 102,104. The heat source 108 may comprise an induction coil wound about the common longitudinal axis 106. Also or alternatively, the heat source 108 may comprise one or more resistance heating elements, a microwave source and/or another heating mechanism known in the art. Referring for example to
In a mold-less casting process, the melt formed by the heat source 108 takes the form of a molten mass 112 of material constrained to a predetermined geometry (e.g., a column) within the central bore 102a of the primary electromagnet 102, as shown in
A particle injection device 110 may be positioned at one or more positions about the common longitudinal axis 106 for injecting particles into the melt 112. The particle injection device 110 may be disposed inside or outside one or both of the primary and secondary electromagnets 102,104.
In one example, the particle injection device 110 may take the form of one or more nozzles 110a positioned about the common longitudinal axis 106 and oriented toward the molten mass of material, as shown for example in
The particle injection device 110 may be positioned inside the secondary electromagnet 104 just above or adjacent to the primary electromagnet 102. In both of these cases, the particles are injected into the molten mass while being exposed to the DC magnetic field of the secondary electromagnet 102,104.
Alternatively, it may be advantageous for the particle injection device 110 to be positioned outside the secondary electromagnet 104 that generates the high magnetic field (e.g., in a case where the particles are ferromagnetic). For this configuration, the primary electromagnet 102 may be designed to extend along the z-axis through and beyond the central bore 104a of the secondary electromagnet 104, such that one or both ends of the primary electromagnet 102 are outside the high field region. Particles generated outside the high field region may be accelerated in the direction of the molten mass 112 of material when emitted from the particle injection device 110.
The particles may be injected at an appropriate mass per time per unit surface area impinged by the molten mass to give the desired mass fraction of particles desired in the final solidified product, as would be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art. The final mass of particles in the desired product may depend on whether a gradient chemistry (surface to center of molten mass) or a uniform dispersion of particles throughout the solidified product is desired. The resultant gradient chemistry or uniform chemistry may depend on the EMAT processing parameters and duration before final solidification of the molten stream.
Referring again to
The cooling mechanism 114 may comprise gas jets directed toward the molten mass, for example, or a gas flow, preferably of a thermally conductive inert gas. Suitable gases include helium, argon, hydrogen and/or nitrogen, although other gases may also or alternatively be used. Helium has a thermal conductivity at 400 K of 191 mW/m·K; hydrogen has a thermal conductivity of 230 mW/m·K. Nitrogen and argon have lower thermal conductivities (32 mW/m·K and 23 mW/m·K, respectively). Mixing small quantities of hydrogen in with nitrogen or argon can yield gases with higher thermal conductivities. Depending on the size of the molten mass of material, the flow of gas may be adjusted to higher or lower flow rates to achieve a desired cooling rate. In addition, the cooling mechanism can involve liquid media such as water, water-polymer mixtures, or oil quenching solutions. The cooling fluid (liquid or gas) may provide a specific cooling rate depending on the delivery rate to the mass surface as well as the thermal conductivity, and this may in turn help to achieve the desired microstructure in the final product.
Several exemplary embodiments of the apparatus and method for dispersing particles in a molten material are described now in reference to
A plurality of nozzles 110a may be employed as the particle injection device 110, as shown in
The apparatus described above according to several embodiments allows EMAT processing to be applied to a mold-less continuous or batch casting process without any contact between the melt and a solid surface during solidification. Instead, the molten material may be supported by the electromagnetic pressure of the AC magnetic field during solidification. The interaction of a time varying magnetic field with the surface of the liquid metal results in an induced AC eddy current at the surface of the melt. The Lorentz force due to the interaction of the eddy current with the applied AC magnetic field results in a pressure gradient that matches the pressure gradient of the excluded AC magnetic field. For the exemplary configurations described herein, the AC magnetic field may be confined to the relatively narrow gap between the primary electromagnet (AC magnetic field coil) and the surface of the liquid metal mass, and can be tailored to support the pressure of the mass during solidification.
The approach described herein allows large amplitude vibrations to be introduced at the surface of a magnetically supported melt for the purpose of improving the properties of the cast material and/or to create opportunities for additional processing steps that are not otherwise possible during the solidification process. For example, large amplitude vibration in the acoustic frequency range may be used to accelerate the dispersion of particles that are introduced at the surface of the molten material prior to solidification. The result may be a gradient chemistry near the surface and/or uniformly dispersed particles throughout the bulk of the cast product, depending on the EMAT duration and processing speeds.
Accordingly, the present method of forming a uniform or gradient composite structure entails forming a molten mass of material unsupported by a mold or other solid body. The molten mass of material may or may not contain particles at this point in the process. A gradient electromagnetic pressure and an oscillatory electromagnetic pressure are applied to the molten mass. The term “gradient electromagnetic pressure” is used in reference to the time-averaged component of the electromagnetic pressure, which is non-oscillatory and which supports the molten mass, as discussed further below. The gradient electromagnetic pressure is varied over at least a portion of the molten mass in order to constrain the molten mass of material to a predetermined shape while the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure promotes mixing. Ultimately, the molten mass of material 112 is solidified to form a particle-reinforced casting 116, such as a metal matrix composite or a polymer matrix composite, which may exhibit improved surface and/or bulk properties.
Particles may be injected into a surface region of the molten mass 112 as the gradient and oscillatory electromagnetic pressures are being applied. The gradient electromagnetic pressure constrains the molten mass 112, and the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure promotes dispersion of the particles in the surface region. Mixing may also occur throughout the entire cross-section of the molten mass. As indicated above, the molten mass of material 112 may contain some amount of particles (“pre-existing particles”) prior to electromagnetic casting. The pre-existing particles may be the same as or different than the particles injected (“injected particles”) into the molten mass of material during processing. The resulting composite material may comprise a uniform or a non-uniform dispersion of the particles, where “particles” may be understood to refer to the injected particles in addition to any pre-existing particles, or to just the pre-existing particles if additional particles are not injected during processing. In one example, there may be a higher concentration of particles at the surface region of the molten mass 112 of material (and ultimately in the solidified composite 116) than in the bulk, due to the particle injection. In another example, particles contained in the molten mass 112 of material prior to exposure to the electromagnetic pressures may be more uniformly dispersed in the molten mass 112 during processing, leading to an extremely homogeneous cast composite 116 with improved properties.
The gradient electromagnetic pressure used to support the molten mass may be varied as a function of z over part or all of the length of the molten mass, particularly when the z-direction coincides with the vertical direction. The variation in the gradient electromagnetic pressure may not be limited to the z-direction, however. For example, the variation may extend about all or a portion of the circumference or perimeter of the molten mass, particularly when the z-direction is not aligned with the vertical direction. The gradient electromagnetic pressure may be varied continuously, such as linearly.
A nonuniform coil spacing may be used to achieve the desired variation of the gradient electromagnetic pressure. For example, the coil windings of the primary electromagnet may be closer together or more dense along one or more portions of the length of the molten mass and further apart or less dense along other portion(s) of the length of the molten mass. In places where the number of turns per unit length varies, magnetic field gradients may occur and the strength of the radial force and thus the electromagnetic pressure may vary as a function of z. The spacing of the windings in the primary electromagnet and/or in the secondary electromagnet may be chosen so as to vary the magnitude of radial force at different positions along the z axis and thus produce the desired electromagnetic pressure gradient. The coil windings of the secondary electromagnet may also be varied as described above. Alternatively, one or both of the primary and secondary electromagnets may have a uniform coil spacing.
Applying the gradient and oscillatory electromagnetic pressures to the molten mass of material may entail exposing the molten mass to an AC magnetic field and to an independent DC magnetic field. The DC magnetic field may comprise a field strength of at least about 1 Tesla, at least about 2 Tesla, at least about 3 Tesla, at least about 4 Tesla, at least about 5 Tesla, at least about 6 Tesla, at least about 7 Tesla, at least about 8 Tesla, at least about 9 Tesla, at least about 10 Tesla, at least about 15 Tesla, or at least about 20 Tesla. The field strength of the DC magnetic field is typically no higher than about 50 Tesla, or no higher than about 30 Tesla. For example, the field strength of the DC magnetic field may be from about 1 Tesla to about 30 Tesla, or from about 5 Tesla to about 20 Tesla. The AC magnetic field may comprise a field strength of from about 0.01 to about 0.5 Tesla and a sonic or ultrasonic frequency of from about 0.05 kHz to about 10,000 kHz.
The molten mass of material may take the form of a cylinder, rectangular slab or other shape having a longitudinal axis oriented along the z-direction, which may coincide with the vertical direction as defined by the force of gravity. In some embodiments, the molten mass of material may be a sphere. As described in greater detail below, for a cylindrical melt, the gradient electromagnetic pressure applied to the molten mass may be expressed mathematically as [Bac(z)]2/2μ, where μ is the permeability in free space and Bac(z) is field strength of the AC magnetic field, and the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure applied to the molten mass may be expressed mathematically as Bdc(Bac(z)/μ)sin(ωt)+([Bac(z)]2/2μ)cos(2 ωt), where μ is permeability in free space, Bac(z) is field strength of the AC magnetic field, Bdc(z) is field strength of the DC magnetic field, t is time, and w=2πf, where f is frequency of the AC magnetic field.
As set forth above in reference to the exemplary apparatus shown in
To form the molten mass of material, at least a portion of a continuous feed of solid material may be melted in a continuous casting process. Alternatively, in a batch casting process, at least a portion of a batch sample of solid material may be melted to form the molten mass of material. As set forth above, a heat source such as an induction coil may partially or completely surround the batch sample or the continuous feed of solid material and may melt at least a portion of the solid material prior to processing by the AC and DC magnetic fields.
In order to support the hydrostatic pressure of the molten mass during the process and prior to solidification, the primary electromagnet which generates the AC magnetic field may be designed to produce a gradient electromagnetic pressure that matches the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid metal mass over the entire extent of the melt zone. The hydrostatic pressure may be lowest at the top of the molten mass and may increase linearly with depth when the molten mass is vertically oriented. The gradient electromagnetic pressure can be tailored to balance the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid mass as a function of height within the melt zone. As described above, the needed gradient may be achieved using a varied coil spacing of the primary electromagnet. Another approach is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,985,179, entitled “Electromagnetic Casting Apparatus,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
For an AC magnetic field and the associated AC eddy current induced on the surface of the melt, the electromagnetic pressure resulting from the Lorentz interaction includes a time dependent oscillatory pressure, the time average of which supports the pressure of the liquid metal mass. Note that for the purposes of the following discussion a cylindrical geometry is assumed, with the axis of the cylindrically shaped liquid metal column (as well as the directions of both the AC and DC magnetic fields) aligned parallel to the z-axis.
The vertically directed AC magnetic field may be represented by Bz=Bo(z)sin(ωt), where ω=2πf and f is the frequency. The resulting azimuthally-directed eddy current induced in the surface of the liquid metal column is given by Jθ(z)=(Bo(z)/μ)sin(ωt), where p is the permeability of free space (in MKS units), and the surface current density, Jθ(z), has units of A/m. In this case, the time-dependent radially-directed pressure is given by Pr(z)=Jθ(z)×Bz=−([Bo(z)]2/μ)sin2(ωt). Note that the pressure is unidirectional (directed radially inward into the surface of the liquid metal column) and does not reverse direction. Since 2 sin2x=1−cos(2×), this can be rewritten as Pr=−([Bo(z)]2/2μ)+([Bo(z)]2/2μ)cos(2 ωt). Therefore the electromagnetic pressure can be represented as a time-averaged inwardly-directed static pressure, given by −[Bo(z)]2/2μ), and an oscillatory component of the same amplitude that oscillates at twice the frequency of the applied AC magnetic field. The first term is a mathematical representation of the gradient electromagnetic pressure, which, as discussed above, is non-oscillatory.
One of the features of electromagnetic casting is that the AC magnetic field inherently results in an incidental acoustic pressure oscillation at twice the frequency of the applied magnetic field, which can be very beneficial to the casting process. However, the amplitude of the resulting acoustic pressure is constrained by the fact that the static pressure gradient of the AC magnetic field is tailored to properly support the liquid metal column and therefore cannot be varied in amplitude. For example, to support a liquid aluminum column having a height of 0.15 m (6″) a magnetic pressure of 0.04 bar may be needed, which in turn requires an AC magnetic field of 0.10 Tesla. In this case, the amplitude of the incidental acoustic pressure is limited to 0.04 bar (4 kPa), which may not be adequate to meet the requirements of the applications addressed by the present method.
Therefore, to provide independent control of the amplitude of the desired acoustic pressure oscillations, an additional static DC magnetic field is incorporated into the process. Referring again to
Combining the above results, the radially-directed J×B pressures resulting from both the DC and AC magnetic field interactions with the induced AC eddy current on the surface of the liquid metal column are given by Pr(z)=Jac(z)×(Bdc+Bac(z))=Bdc(Bac(z)/μ)sin(ωt)−([Bac(z)]2/2μ)+([Bac(z)]2/2μ)cos(2ωt), where Jac(z), Bac(z), Bdc, and ω have all been defined previously above. As already noted, the first term represents the oscillatory electromagnetic pressure resulting from the interaction of the induced surface current with the static DC magnetic field, the second term represents the inward directed gradient electromagnetic pressure designed to support the molten column, which is due solely to the AC magnetic field, and the third term is an oscillatory electromagnetic pressure at twice the frequency of the AC magnetic field, which is small compared to the first term whenever Bdc>>Bac.
If, for example, the material to be processed is embedded in a uniform DC magnetic field of 10 Tesla and is used in conjunction with a confinement AC magnetic field of 0.1 Tesla, the induced acoustic pressure may have an amplitude of 4 bar (0.4 MPa) or 100 times larger than the acoustic excitation inherently provided by the confining AC magnetic field alone (albeit the latter is at twice the frequency). For other values of the DC magnetic field, the amplitude of the induced acoustic pressure varies linearly with the strength of the DC magnetic field. Acoustic pressure fields of this magnitude can provide the conditions beneficial for the casting method described herein, as well as the required flexibility. As the strength of the DC magnetic field is varied from 1 to 20 Tesla, the amplitude of the acoustic pressure drive to the surface of the melt increases from 0.4 to 8 bar (i.e. from 0.04 to 0.8 MPa). In this manner, the amplitude of the acoustical excitation can be adjusted to match the requirements of a specific processing technique.
The effectiveness of the acoustic stimulation can be greatly enhanced if the electromagnetic frequency coincides with a natural resonant frequency of the casting. Because of the large mismatch in the acoustic impedance at a liquid-air interface, most of the acoustic energy can be trapped within the liquid metal, forming an acoustical resonator. If the frequency is chosen to match a natural resonant frequency of the melt column, depending on the density of the melt and the diameter of the column, etc., then the peak acoustic pressure in the resonator may be enhanced by a factor that is equal to the quality factor of the resonator. Quality factors for molten columns can extend up into the range of 10, or more, depending on the length of the column. In some instances, consideration of acoustical resonances can be advantageous.
If the axial location of the secondary electromagnet is not concentric with the primary electromagnet, then the Lorentz force varies with distance from the center region of the secondary electromagnet and results in both radially-directed oscillations due to the axial magnetic field component, as well as axially-directed oscillations due to the radial components of the DC magnetic field. If the axis of the AC coil is not perfectly aligned with the axis of the DC magnetic field coil, then the currents induced in the surface of the solidifying metal may experience a torque that tends to rotate the material into alignment.
Materials that may be processed using the above-described method and apparatus include electrically conductive materials that are responsive to the AC and DC fields described above. Any electrically conductive material with a conductivity suitable for electromagnetic levitation without incurring excessive power dissipation arising from levitation currents induced in the surface of the material may be used. For example, suitable materials may include metals, alloys, conductive polymers and semiconductors, as well as materials that are not inherently conductive but may be rendered conductive, such as polymers that include electrically conductive particles (e.g., chopped carbon fibers, graphene platelets, or ferromagnetic particles) of microscale or nanoscale sizes dispersed throughout the volume or at the surface of the material. Accordingly, suitable materials may contain one or more elements selected from the group consisting of: Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Ga, Si, Ge, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb, Bi, Po, V, C, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Th, Yb, Lu, and Y.
The particles that are injected into the molten mass may be microscale or nanoscale particles ranging in linear size from about 1 nm to tens of microns, where the linear size refers to a nominal diameter or length of the particles. The linear size may refer to a primary particle size or to an agglomerate size. Typically, the particles have a linear size of from about 1 nm to about 1 micron, or from about 10 nm to about 500 nm. The particles may be substantially spherical or they may be elongated with a length-to-width aspect ratio greater than 1, greater than 5, or greater than 10. The particles may be injected in the form of a dry powder or a liquid dispersion, where in the latter case the particles are dispersed in a solvent. The particles may be electrically conductive, semiconductive or nonconductive, and they may be organic or inorganic. For example, the particles may comprise one or more of the following: carbon or a carbide, an oxide, a boride, a silicide, a nitride, and/or a fluoride. The particles may further have a surface coating to promote wetting and incorporation into the molten (or semi-solid) mass, and/or to provide a better interface between the particles and the solidified matrix to improve cohesion/bonding in the final cast product.
The particles injected into the surface and/or bulk of the molten mass of material may be selected to be useful as structural or functional particles upon solidification of the molten mass. The resulting solidified material may be a composite (e.g., a metal matrix composite or a polymer matrix composite) comprising a uniform or gradient microstructure due to the particle injection during casting.
The method and apparatus described herein according to various embodiments may facilitate superior surface castings for continuously cast bar product, eliminate any possibility of undesirable mold-casting interactions, and enable the introduction of nanoparticle dispersions into the molten surface, thereby producing either uniform dispersion or gradient dispersion composites or nanocomposites. The particle impingement speed and volume fraction, along with dwell time in the high magnetic field during solidification, may enable either gradient dispersion microstructures or uniform dispersion microstructures, depending on the final application requirements.
Examples of possible advantages of the above-described technology include: (a) Magnetic-field-enhanced alloy solute solubilities leading to new precipitation hardened alloys with accelerated kinetics and superior performance; (b) Next-generation nanoparticle-reinforced metal matrix composites for higher strength and higher creep temperature applications; (c) Rare-earth-, yttria-, and silver-free aluminum alloys with enhanced creep resistance comparable to alloys containing these additions, and similar benefits are anticipated for magnesium alloys; (d) High-specific strength, enhanced creep performance nanoparticle- and/or nanoprecipitate-reinforced aluminum for electric power transmission applications, with a performance target for electrical conductivity approaching that of pure copper; (e) Rapid, low-cost production of single-crystal or near-perfect textured materials for semiconductor, automotive (e.g., turbocharger compressor) and aerospace (e.g., turbine blades) applications.
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain embodiments thereof, other embodiments are possible without departing from the present invention. The spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited, therefore, to the description of the preferred embodiments contained herein. All embodiments that come within the meaning of the claims, either literally or by equivalence, are intended to be embraced therein.
Furthermore, the advantages described above are not necessarily the only advantages of the invention, and it is not necessarily expected that all of the described advantages will be achieved with every embodiment of the invention.
Ludtka, Gerard M., Wilgen, John B.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3985179, | Jul 28 1975 | Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation | Electromagnetic casting apparatus |
4289946, | May 15 1978 | Olin Corporation | Electromagnetic casting apparatus |
4473104, | Jan 10 1980 | Olin Corporation | Electromagnetic casting process and apparatus |
4523625, | Feb 07 1983 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Method of making strips of metallic glasses having uniformly distributed embedded particulate matter |
4530404, | Jul 07 1983 | Aluminium Pechiney | Process for the electromagnetic casting of metals involving the use of at least one magnetic field which differs from the field of confinement |
4741383, | Jun 10 1986 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Horizontal electromagnetic casting of thin metal sheets |
4846255, | Oct 28 1987 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Electromagnetic augmentation for casting of thin metal sheets |
5014769, | Apr 17 1989 | INDUCTOTHERM CORP , 10 INDEL AVE , RANCOCAS, NJ 08073, A CORP OF NJ | Induction melting of metals without a crucible |
6402367, | Jun 01 2000 | HANJOO METAL | Method and apparatus for magnetically stirring a thixotropic metal slurry |
7161124, | Apr 19 2005 | UT-Battelle, LLC | Thermal and high magnetic field treatment of materials and associated apparatus |
7534980, | Mar 30 2006 | UT-Battelle, LLC | High magnetic field ohmically decoupled non-contact technology |
7745765, | Apr 19 2005 | UT-Battelle, LLC | Thermal and high magnetic field treatment of materials and associated apparatus |
20120060648, | |||
20120227924, | |||
20140299288, | |||
CN100392126, | |||
CN101391291, | |||
CN101787503, | |||
CN102121075, | |||
CN103484706, | |||
JP4661548, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 21 2015 | UT-Battelle, LLC | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jul 13 2015 | LUDTKA, GERARD M | UT-Battelle, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036192 | /0544 | |
Jul 17 2015 | WILGEN, JOHN B | UT-Battelle, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036192 | /0544 | |
Aug 10 2015 | UT-Battelle, LLC | U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY | CONFIRMATORY LICENSE SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037161 | /0176 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 09 2019 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Nov 13 2023 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Apr 29 2024 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 22 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 22 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 22 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 22 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 22 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 22 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |