In a liquid ejection head for ejecting liquid by using thermal energy, reduction of film thickness caused by elution of a protective layer when kogation on the protective layer is removed is made uniform and decrease in liquid ejection performance is suppressed. More specifically, a counter electrode is provided around a portion on which an ejection port of a flow path forming member is formed.
|
1. A liquid ejection head comprising:
a substrate having a heating section and a protective film that has an area overlapping with the heating section when viewed from a direction orthogonal to a face of the substrate,
an electrode capable of generating a voltage between the protective film and the electrode;
a flow path formed between a surface of the protective film and a surface of the electrode; and
an ejection port, liquid being ejected from the ejection port with use of heat generated by the heating section via the protective film,
wherein the protective film and the electrode are arranged such that a distance in the flow path between the area of the protective film and the electrode corresponding to the area satisfies 1<a/b≦2 when a maximum distance is set as “a” and a minimum distance is set as “b”.
2. The liquid ejection head according to
3. The liquid ejection head according to
4. The liquid ejection head according to
5. The liquid ejection head according to
6. The liquid ejection head according to
8. The liquid ejection head according to
9. A liquid ejection apparatus comprising:
the liquid ejection head according to
a control unit configured to perform control to produce a potential difference between the protective film and the electrode.
10. The liquid ejection head according to
11. The liquid ejection head according to
12. The liquid ejection head according to
13. The liquid ejection head according to
15. The liquid ejection head according to
16. A liquid ejection apparatus comprising:
the liquid ejection head according to
a control unit configured to perform control to produce a potential difference between the protective film and the electrode.
17. The liquid ejection head according to
18. The liquid ejection head according to
|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a liquid ejection head and a liquid ejection apparatus, and more particularly to the configuration of removing so-called kogation on a heat acting portion in a liquid ejection head for ejecting liquid such as ink by causing heat to act on the liquid to generate bubbles.
2. Description of the Related Art
In a liquid ejection head having a system of using thermal energy generated by an electrothermal transducer element to generate bubbles in liquid such as ink to eject the liquid, so-called kogation occurs on a heat acting portion and thereby the heat conduction from the heat acting portion to the liquid becomes uneven. This may occasionally cause unstable ejection.
In this respect, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2008-105364 discloses providing an area which includes a heat acting portion with an upper protective layer acting as an electrode for generating an electrochemical reaction with ink, allowing the surface of the upper protective layer to be eluted, and removing kogation on the heat acting portion. In this configuration, for the arrangement of electrodes to generate the electrochemical reaction, the upper protective layer on the heat acting portion is set as an anode and a layer formed on the same plane as the upper protective layer is set as a cathode. That is, the anode and the cathode are located in parallel on a substrate.
In a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a liquid ejection head comprising: a heating section, a protective film provided above the heating section, an electrode capable of generating a voltage between the protective film and the electrode; and an ejection port, so as to eject liquid from the ejection port with use of heat generated by the heating section via the protective film, wherein the protective film and the electrode are arranged such that a distance between the protective film and the electrode satisfies 1<a/b≦2 when a maximum distance is set as “a” and a minimum distance is set as “b”.
Further features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments (with reference to the attached drawings).
In the configuration of Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2008-105364, in a process of dissolving an upper protective layer on a heat acting portion by an electrochemical reaction, a dissolution level of the upper protective layer may occasionally be uneven. More specifically, a distance between the cathode and the upper protective layer as an anode varies depending on a portion on the upper protective layer, and accordingly, a resistance at the timing of dissolution varies. This causes a variation in an elution amount of a surface layer depending on a portion on the upper protective layer when kogation is removed, and as a result, the film thickness of the upper protective layer becomes uneven. In this case, the heat conduction from the heat acting portion to liquid via the upper protective layer becomes uneven, leading to a decrease in liquid ejection performance.
An object of the present invention is to provide a liquid ejection head and a liquid ejection apparatus capable of making the reduction of the film thickness caused by elution of the protective layer when kogation on the protective layer is removed uniform, and controlling a decrease in liquid ejection performance.
Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the attached drawings.
Ink jet printing apparatus
When performing the processing of removing kogation adhering to a protective layer (protective film) in the print head, which will be described later, the ink jet printing apparatus performs control to generate a potential difference between the protective layer and a counter electrode. Incidentally, the counter electrode means an electrode capable of applying a voltage between the protective layer and the counter electrode, and the position of the counter electrode is not specified.
Ink Jet Cartridge
Print Head Substrate
In the conventional example shown in these figures, an upper protective layer 107 as an electrode and a counter electrode 122 are made of the same material through the same process to generate an electrochemical reaction, and these electrodes are arranged in a planar direction. In this configuration, a voltage is applied across both electrodes with ink filled therebetween when removing kogation deposited on the surface of the upper protective layer 107 of a heating section 104a which is a part of the heating resistor, and the upper protective layer above the heating section is dissolved in the ink by an electrochemical reaction, thereby isolating and removing the kogation.
However, in the conventional example, as shown in
In the present invention, a counter electrode is disposed such that a difference between the longest distance and the shortest distance between electrodes becomes small. More specifically, in a first embodiment of the present invention, a counter electrode is provided around a portion, in which an ejection port is formed, on a surface of a flow path forming member which faces the upper protective layer, so that a difference between the longest distance “a” and the shortest distance “b” between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode is reduced.
An upper protective layer 107 as a protective film protects the heating section from chemical action by ink when a bubble is generated by heating of the heating section 104a and physical impact at the time of defoaming. Kogation may adhere to the surface of the protective layer as described above, and the protective layer acts as an electrode for removing the kogation. More specifically, the upper protective layer 107 is a layer eluted by an electrochemical reaction when the kogation is removed. In the present embodiment, for the upper protective layer 107 that contacts the ink, metal eluted by an electrochemical reaction in the ink, more specifically, iridium Ir, is used. Then, a portion 108 of the upper protective layer 107 located above the heating section 104a serves as a heat acting portion for causing heat generated by the heating section 104a to act on the ink. Incidentally, a contact layer 109 as an intermediate layer is provided between the upper protective layer 107 and the protective layer 106, thereby improving adhesion between these two layers. More specifically, tantalum Ta is used as the contact layer 109. The contact layer 109 forms a wiring portion for electrically connecting the upper protective layer 107 with an external terminal, and is made of a material having electrical conductivity. The contact layer 109 is inserted into a through hole (not shown) formed through the protective layer 106, and is connected to the electrode wiring layer 105. The end of the electrode wiring layer 105 acts as an external electrode for electrical connection with the external terminal. Accordingly, the upper protective layer 107 and the external terminal are electrically connected.
The print head substrate 1 is provided with the flow path forming member 120 made of an inorganic material such as SiN or SiO2 forming an ink flow path and a liquid chamber with a silicon base. On the flow path forming member 120, the ejection port 121 is provided at a position opposite to the heat acting portion 108. In the present embodiment, the flow path forming member 120 is provided with the counter electrode 122 made of iridium Ir. More specifically, the counter electrode 122 is connected with counter electrode wiring 123 made of Ta disposed inside the flow path forming member 120, and is connected to an external power supply. To cover the counter electrode wiring 123, an electrode protective layer 126 made of SiN or SiO2 is formed. The counter electrode wiring 123 has a function of improving adhesion between the flow path forming member 120 and the counter electrode. In the processing of removing kogation, the counter electrode 122 is used to produce a positive potential at the upper protective layer 107 and a negative potential at the counter electrode 122 by a control unit 505 provided for the ink jet printing apparatus, in a state in which the ink flow path and the liquid chamber are filled with ink, to generate an electrochemical reaction between the upper protective layer and the ink, so as to dissolve the upper protective layer. That is, the print head substrate of the present embodiment is provided with a counter electrode at a portion in a direction crossing the surface of the upper protective layer, and a configuration including an electrode for generating a potential difference between the counter electrode and the upper protective layer.
A description will be given of Examples 1-1 to 1-3 according to the present embodiment, in connection with the positional relation between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode and the resulting uniformity of a dissolution amount of the upper protective layer, in comparison with Comparative Examples 1 and 2.
As shown in these figures, in the present example, the heating section 104a has a size of 30 μm×30 μm, and an insulating protective layer having a thickness of 200 to 300 nm is formed on the heating section. Further, on the insulating protective layer, a contact layer of Ta having a thickness of 100 nm is formed. The upper protective layer 107 is formed to have a thickness of 100 nm, above the heating section via the above-mentioned films. The size of the upper protective layer is 32.5 μm×32.5 μm and the upper protective layer is patterned in a square. Above these films and layers, the flow path forming member 120 is provided. The flow path forming member is made of an inorganic material such as SiN or Si02 and has a thickness of 3 μm in a vertical direction in the figures, and a liquid chamber for foaming ink is defined by the flow path forming member. The flow path and the liquid chamber have a height of 7 μm and are provided with an ejection port having a diameter of 10 μm above the heat acting portion.
In the present example, the counter electrode 122 is provided on the flow path forming member 120 inside the liquid chamber as shown in
In Example 1-2, the maximum value “a” between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode is, as shown in
In Example 1-3, the maximum value “a” between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode is, as shown in
In the present comparative example, the counter electrode has a circular form having a diameter of 16.6 μm, in which an area of the ejection port having a diameter of 10 μm is opened. In Comparative Example 1, the maximum value “a” between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode is the distance between a portion on the upper protective layer corresponding to an end portion of the heating section 104a and an end portion of the counter electrode, as shown in
Comparative Example 2 is the conventional configuration disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2008-105364 and, as shown in
By using the print head according to Examples 1-1 to 1-3 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 as described above, a dissolution amount of the upper protective layer is studied. In this study, the ink liquid chamber is filled with pigment ink, and a voltage of 10 V and a voltage of −10 V are applied to the upper protective layer and the counter electrode, respectively, for 60 seconds. A decrease in the thickness of the upper protective layer (film reduction amount) is obtained, and a maximum value and a minimum value of the film reduction amount are obtained. The results are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Relation between interelectrode distance
and uniformity of film reduction amount
Uniformity of
a. Maximum
b. Minimum
film reduction
distance
distance
a/b
amount
Example 1-1
8.6 μm
7 μm
1.2
∘
Example 1-2
10.7 μm
7 μm
1.5
∘
Example 1-3
14 μm
7 μm
2.0
∘
Comparative
14.7 μm
7 μm
2.1
Δ
Example 1
Comparative
40 μm
10 μm
4.0
Δ
Example 2
In Table 1, uniformity of the film reduction amount resulting from dissolution of iridium which forms a protective layer is denoted by “◯,” “Δ” and “×” respectively when the value obtained by dividing the maximum value of the film reduction amount by the minimum value of the film reduction amount is equal to or less than 2, when the value is equal to or greater than 2 and equal to or less than 5, and when the value is equal to or greater than 5.
As can be seen from Table 1, in Example 1-1 in which the difference between the maximum distance “a” and the minimum distance “b” is small, that is, when a ratio a/b is small, a difference in the film reduction amount on the upper protective layer is little. In Examples 1-2 and 1-3, as a difference between the distances increases, that is, as a ratio between the distances increases, uniformity of the film reduction amount gradually decreases, and as a difference between the distances increases as in Comparative Examples 1 and 2, a difference in the film reduction amount exceeds two times.
The smaller the ratio of the maximum distance “a” to the minimum distance “b,” the more uniformly the upper protective layer dissolves. It is considered that this is because the smaller the ratio, the more uniform the electric field strength. In view of Table 1, in a case where potentials are produced between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode to dissolve the upper protective layer, when a ratio a/b between the distances has the relation of 1<a/b≦2, the dissolution amount of the upper protective layer satisfies a maximum film reduction amount/minimum film reduction amount ≦2. Accordingly, the upper protective layer is dissolved more uniformly.
A second embodiment of the present invention is to reduce a difference between a maximum distance “a” and a minimum distance “b” regarding the distance between an upper protective layer and a counter electrode, by providing a step portion on a base member of a print head substrate and providing a counter electrode on the step.
Also in the present embodiment, after a liquid chamber is filled with ink, a positive potential is produced at an upper protective layer 107 and a negative potential is produced at the counter electrode 122 to generate an electrochemical reaction, thereby dissolving a surface of the upper protective layer. This processing allows removal of kogation generated on the surface of the upper protective layer.
A description will be given of Examples 2-1 and 2-2 according to the present embodiment in connection with the positional relation between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode and uniformity of the dissolution amount of the upper protective layer.
In the present example, a heating section 104a is a square having a size of 30 μm×30 μm, and an insulating protective layer having a thickness of 200 to 300 nm is formed on the heating section. Further, on the insulating protective layer, a contact layer of tantalum Ta having a thickness of 100 nm is formed. The upper protective layer 107 is formed to have a thickness of 100 nm above these layers to cover the heating section 104a, thus forming the heat acting portion 108 (see
In Example 2-1, as shown in
By using the print head according to Examples 2-1 and 2-2 and Comparative Example 3 as described above, a dissolution amount of the upper protective layer is studied. In this study, the ink liquid chamber is filled with pigment ink, and a voltage of 10 V and a voltage of −10 V are applied at the upper protective layer 107 and the counter electrode 122, respectively, for 60 seconds. A decrease in the film reduction amount of each part on the surface of the upper protective layer 107 is obtained, and a maximum value and a minimum value of the film reduction amount are obtained. The results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Relation between interelectrode distance
and uniformity of film reduction amount
Uniformity of
a. Maximum
b. Minimum
film reduction
distance
distance
a/b
amount
Example 2-1
34.6 μm
30.1 μm
1.15
∘
Example 2-2
19.7 μm
9.7 μm
2.0
∘
Comparative
19.2 μm
8.8 μm
2.2
Δ
Example 3
In Table 2, uniformity of the film reduction amount resulting from dissolution of iridium Ir is denoted by “◯,” “Δ,” and “×” respectively when the value obtained by dividing the maximum value of the film reduction amount by the minimum value of the film reduction amount is equal to or less than 2, when the value is equal to or greater than 2 and equal to or less than 5, and when the value is equal to or greater than 5.
As can be seen from Table 2, in Example 2-1 in which the difference between the maximum distance and the minimum distance is small, a difference in the film reduction amount among the parts of the upper protective layer is little. However, as the difference between the distances increases, uniformity of the film reduction amount gradually decreases, and as a difference between the distances increases as in Comparative Example 3, a difference in the film reduction amount exceeds two times. In this manner, also in the present embodiment, the smaller the ratio of the maximum value “a” of the distance to the minimum value “b” of the distance, the more uniformly the upper protective layer dissolves. That is, when a ratio a/b between the distances (between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode) has the relation of a/b≦2, the dissolution amount of the upper protective layer satisfies a maximum film reduction amount/minimum film reduction amount ≦2. Accordingly, the upper protective layer is dissolved more uniformly.
(Manufacturing Method of the Exemplary Print Head Substrate)
First, as shown in
Next, as shown in
Next, iridium Ir forming the upper protective layer 107 is patterned so as to be left on the heating section, and then the contact layer 109 made of tantalum Ta is patterned. Incidentally, the contact layer 109 made of tantalum Ta acts as wiring for supplying power to the upper protective layer 107 acting as an electrode for removing kogation (
Next, as shown in
Next, as shown in
Then, as shown in
Then, after forming an ink supply port, as shown in
In a third embodiment of the present invention, a difference between a longest distance “a” and a shortest distance “b” between an upper protective layer and a counter electrode is reduced by providing a counter electrode on a side wall portion or the like of a supply port for supplying ink to a heat acting portion with an ejection energy generating element on a print head substrate.
In the present embodiment, regarding the arrangement of a counter electrode used for removing kogation, Example 3-1 shows the case of providing a counter electrode on each of the common liquid supply port 216 and the liquid supply port 217 whose shapes are formed by wet etching and dry etching as shown in
In the present embodiment, on a wall portion defining the common liquid supply port 216 and the liquid supply port 217, a counter electrode contact layer 214 made of tantalum Ta and a counter electrode 213 made of iridium Ir are formed. The counter electrode 213 is connected to the counter electrode contact layer 214, and to the external power supply. Incidentally, Ir used for the counter electrode 213 is a noble metal having excellent chemical resistance, and is insoluble in alkaline or acid. Therefore, in a case where the back side contacts ink, the counter electrode 213 may be arranged to the back side of the substrate as a protection against corrosion of the silicon substrate due to ink. Further, on the substrate 201 on which the above layers are formed, the flow path forming member 208 is formed. On the flow path forming member 208, the ejection port 209 is formed at a position corresponding to the heat acting portion (heating section 203a).
In the processing of removing kogation, after a liquid chamber including the heat acting portion is filled with ink, a positive potential is produced at the upper protective layer 206 and a negative potential is produced at the counter electrode 213 to generate an electrochemical reaction. Accordingly, a surface of the upper protective layer 206 is dissolved and kogation adhering to the surface is removed.
A description will be given of the following examples and comparative example in connection with the positional relation between the upper protective layer 206 and the counter electrode 213 and uniformity of the dissolution of the upper protective layer.
An ink supply port of Example 3-1 is configured to include the common liquid supply port 216 and the plurality of liquid supply ports 217 which are in communication with the common liquid supply port. The counter electrode 213 used for removing kogation is provided on a wall portion defining the common liquid supply port 216 and each of the plurality of liquid supply ports 217.
In the present example, the heating section 203a has a size of 15 μm×15 μm, and the insulating protective layer 204 having a thickness of 200 to 300 nm is formed on the heating section 203a. On the insulating protective layer 204, the contact layer 205 made of tantalum Ta is formed to have a thickness of 100 nm, and the upper protective layer 206 made of iridium Ir is formed thereon to have a thickness of 100 nm to cover the heating section 203a. The upper protective layer 206 is a square having a size of 20 μm×20 μm.
The counter electrode 213 is, as shown in
In the above configuration, the distance between the counter electrode 213 and the upper protective layer 206 is as follows. As shown in
Example 3-2 shows the case of providing the counter electrode 213 on a side wall of the common liquid supply port 216.
In the present example, on the heating section 203a having a size of 15 μm×15 μm, the insulating protective layer 204 having a thickness of 200 to 300 nm is formed. The contact layer 205 made of tantalum Ta is formed to have a thickness of 100 nm on the insulating protective layer 204, and further the upper protective layer 206 is formed to have a thickness of 100 nm to cover the heating section 203a. The upper protective layer 206 is a square having a size of 20 μm×20 μm. A distance between an end portion of the upper protective layer 206 and the top end of the common liquid supply port 216 is 30 μm, and a distance between the top end of the supply port and the counter electrode 213 is 2 μm. The counter electrode 213 is, as shown in
In the present example, a distance between the side wall of the common liquid supply port 216 on the side of the counter electrode 213 and a portion of the upper protective layer 206 corresponding to an end of the heating section 203a is 32 μm, which is the minimum value “b.” Meanwhile, a maximum value “a” of a distance between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode is a distance between a portion of the upper protective layer 206 corresponding to an end of the heating section 203a and an end portion of the counter electrode 213, which is 52 μm.
Comparative Example 4 relates to the print head substrate according to the conventional example disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2008-105364 like Comparative Example 2 as described above. Details of the conventional example are described above with reference to
Table 3 shows comparison results of a dissolution amount of the upper protective layer 206 in the processing of removing kogation according to Examples 3-1 and 3-2 as described above and that according to Comparative Example 4. More specifically, each ink liquid chamber on the print head substrate is filled with pigment ink, and a voltage of 10 V and a voltage of −10 V are applied to the upper protective layer 206 and the counter electrode 213, respectively, for 60 seconds. A decrease in the film reduction amount of the upper protective layer 206 is obtained, and a maximum value and a minimum value of the film reduction amount are obtained.
TABLE 3
Relation between interelectrode distance
and uniformity of film reduction amount
Uniformity of
a. Maximum
b. Minimum
film reduction
distance
distance
a/b
amount
Example 3-1
32 μm
22 μm
1.45
∘
Example 3-2
52 μm
32 μm
1.63
∘
Comparative
40 μm
10 μm
4
x
Example 4
In the study shown in Table 3, the film reduction amount resulting from dissolution of iridium is denoted by “◯” when the value obtained by dividing the maximum value of the film reduction amount by the minimum value of the film reduction amount is equal to or less than 2. In Examples 3-1 and 3-2 in which a difference between the maximum distance and the minimum distance is relatively small, that is, when a ratio a/b is relatively small, a difference in the film reduction amount on the upper protective layer 206 is little. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 4 in which a difference between the distances is large, uniformity of the film reduction amount gradually reduced. As a result of the study, it is found that a difference in film reduction amount is generated when the ratio a/b exceeds 2. That is, the smaller the ratio of the maximum distance “a” to the minimum distance “b,” the more uniform the electric field strength and the more uniformly the upper protective layer 206 dissolves. In a case where a voltage is generated between the upper protective layer 206 and the counter electrode 213 to dissolve the upper protective layer 206, when the interelectrode distance has the relation of a/b≦2, the dissolution amount of the upper protective layer 206 satisfies a maximum film reduction amount/minimum film reduction amount ≦2. Accordingly, the upper protective layer 206 is dissolved more uniformly.
(Manufacturing Method of the Exemplary Print Head Substrate)
A manufacturing method of the print head substrate of the above-described Example 3-1 will be described.
First, as shown in
Next, iridium Ir forming the upper protective layer 206 is patterned so as to be left on the heat acting portion, and then the contact layer 205 made of tantalum Ta is patterned. Incidentally, the contact layer 205 acts as wiring for supplying power to the upper protective layer 206 acting as an electrode for removing kogation.
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the process shown in
In the present embodiment, counter electrodes 122 made of iridium Ir are provided on a protective layer 106. That is, the counter electrodes are connected to counter electrode wiring made of Ta provided on the protective layer 106, and are connected to an external power supply. Further, the counter electrodes and the counter electrode wiring are formed simultaneously in the process of forming an upper protective layer 107 and a contact layer 109, respectively. In the processing of removing kogation, the counter electrodes are used so that a positive potential is produced at the upper protective layer 107 and a negative potential is produced at the counter electrodes to generate an electrochemical reaction on the upper protective layer, thereby dissolving the upper protective layer, in a state in which an ink flow path and a liquid chamber are filled with ink. That is, on a print head substrate of the present embodiment, counter electrodes are provided on a portion on the same plane as the upper protective layer, and an electrode for generating a potential difference between the counter electrodes and the upper protective layer and others are provided.
A description will be given of Examples 4-1 to 4-3 in connection with the positional relation between the upper protective layer and the counter electrodes and the resulting uniformity of a dissolution amount of the upper protective layer, in comparison with Comparative Examples 5 and 6.
As shown in these figures, in the present example, a heating section 104a has a size of 30 μm×30 μm, and an insulating protective layer having a thickness of 200 to 300 nm is formed on the heating section 104a. Further, on the insulating protective layer, a contact layer of Ta having a thickness of 100 nm is formed. An upper protective layer 107 is formed to have a thickness of 100 nm via the above-mentioned films above the heating section. The upper protective layer is patterned in a square having a size of the 32.5 μm×32.5 μm. Above these films and layers, a flow path forming member 120 is provided. The flow path forming member 120 defines a liquid chamber for generating a bubble in ink.
In the present example, counter electrodes 122 are provided on the film inside the liquid chamber as shown in
The present example will also be described with reference to
In Example 4-2, the maximum value “a” between the upper protective layer 107 and the counter electrode 122 is the distance between a portion on the upper protective layer 107 corresponding to a center part of the heating section 104a and an end portion of the counter electrode 122, as shown in
The present example will also be described with reference to
In Example 4-3, the maximum value “a” between the upper protective layer 107 and the counter electrode 122 is the distance between a portion on the upper protective layer 107 corresponding to a center part of the heating section 104a and an end portion of the counter electrode 122, as shown in
In the present comparative example, like Example 4-1, the counter electrodes 122 are provided on the layer inside the liquid chamber as shown in
In Comparative Example 5, the maximum value “a” between the upper protective layer 107 and the counter electrode 122 is the distance between a portion on the upper protective layer 107 corresponding to a center part of the heating section 104a and an end portion of the counter electrode 122, as shown in
Comparative Example 6 is the conventional configuration disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2008-105364 and, as shown in
By using the print head according to Examples 4-1 to 4-3 and Comparative Examples 5 and 6 as described above, a dissolution amount of the upper protective layer is studied. In this study, the ink liquid chamber is filled with pigment ink, and a voltage of 10 V and a voltage of −10 V are applied to the upper protective layer and the counter electrode, respectively, for 60 seconds. A decrease in the thickness of the upper protective layer (film reduction amount) is obtained, and a maximum value and a minimum value of the film reduction amount are obtained. The results are shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4
Relation between interelectrode distance
and uniformity of film reduction amount
Uniformity of
a. Maximum
b. Minimum
film reduction
distance
distance
a/b
amount
Example 4-1
40 μm
25 μm
1.6
∘
Example 4-2
35 μm
20 μm
1.75
∘
Example 4-3
30 μm
15 μm
2.0
∘
Comparative
28 μm
13 μm
2.15
Δ
Example 5
Comparative
40 μm
10 μm
4.0
x
Example 6
In Table 4, uniformity of the film reduction amount resulting from dissolution of iridium which forms an upper protective layer is denoted by “◯,” “Δ,” and “×” respectively when the value obtained by dividing the maximum value of the film reduction amount by the minimum value of the film reduction amount is equal to or less than 2, when the value is equal to or greater than 2 and equal to or less than 5, and when the value is equal to or greater than 5.
As can be seen from Table 4, in Example 4-1 in which the difference between the maximum distance “a” and the minimum distance “b” is small, that is, when a ratio a/b is small, a difference in the film reduction amount on the upper protective layer is little. In Examples 4-2 and 4-3, as a difference between the distances increases, that is, as a ratio between the distances increases, uniformity of the film reduction amount gradually decreases, and as a difference between the distances increases as in Comparative Examples 5 and 6, a difference in the film reduction amount exceeds two times.
The smaller the ratio of the maximum distance “a” to the minimum distance “b,” the more uniformly the upper protective layer dissolves. It is considered that this is because the smaller the ratio, the more uniform the electric field strength. In view of Table 4, in a case where a potential is produced between the upper protective layer and the counter electrode to dissolve the upper protective layer, when a ratio a/b between the distances has the relation of 1<a/b≦2, the dissolution amount of the upper protective layer satisfies a maximum film reduction amount/minimum film reduction amount ≦2. Accordingly, the upper protective layer is dissolved more uniformly.
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-217202, filed Oct. 18, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Takahashi, Kenji, Saito, Ichiro, Sakuma, Sadayoshi, Misumi, Yoshinori, Kato, Maki, Ishida, Yuzuru, Yoshinari, Norihiro
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10434777, | Jun 02 2017 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Liquid ejecting head, cleaning method, and liquid ejecting apparatus |
10882314, | Oct 18 2018 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Liquid ejection head, method for producing liquid ejection head, and liquid ejection apparatus |
9682552, | May 08 2015 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Liquid ejection head, method of cleaning the same, and recording apparatus |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7950769, | Dec 09 2005 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Circuit board for ink jet head, ink jet head having the same, method for cleaning the head and ink jet printing apparatus using the head |
7980656, | Jun 24 2008 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Liquid ejection head |
8123330, | Dec 09 2005 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Circuit board for ink jet head, ink jet head having the same, method for cleaning the head and ink jet printing apparatus using the head |
8491087, | Dec 09 2005 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Circuit board for ink jet head, ink jet head having the same, method for cleaning the head and ink jet printing apparatus using the head |
20070146428, | |||
20150029267, | |||
JP2008105364, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 10 2014 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 20 2014 | ISHIDA, YUZURU | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035612 | /0145 | |
Oct 20 2014 | SAKUMA, SADAYOSHI | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035612 | /0145 | |
Oct 20 2014 | YOSHINARI, NORIHIRO | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035612 | /0145 | |
Oct 20 2014 | SAITO, ICHIRO | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035612 | /0145 | |
Oct 20 2014 | TAKAHASHI, KENJI | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035612 | /0145 | |
Oct 20 2014 | MISUMI, YOSHINORI | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035612 | /0145 | |
Oct 21 2014 | KATO, MAKI | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035612 | /0145 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 27 2019 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 21 2023 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 12 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 12 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 12 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 12 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 12 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 12 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 12 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 12 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 12 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 12 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 12 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 12 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |