A dosing system for a liquid or viscous dosing material, including an actuator system, that has at least one actuating element and a nozzle with an outlet opening. The dosing system is designed so that during a movement in a closure direction the actuating element is initially moved in a first partial movement in such a way that the actuating element is separated from the closure element at a stop location, intended for that purpose, and then comes into contact with the closure element at the stop location and exerts an impulse on the closure element. This also relates to a corresponding dosing method.
|
11. A method of dosing a liquid or viscous dosing material with the aid of a dosing system, including
a nozzle with an outlet opening, a closure element and an actuator system, that has a piezoelectric actuator and at least one actuating element comprising a lever which temporarily connects the piezoelectric actuator with the closure element,
the method comprising the steps of
initially moving the actuating element in a first partial movement in such a way that the actuating element is separated from the closure element at an intended stop location, and then strikes the closure element at the stop location and exerts an impulse on the closure element.
1. A dosing system for a liquid or viscous dosing material, the dosing system comprising
a nozzle with an outlet opening,
a closure element, and
an actuator system having a piezoelectric actuator and at least one actuating element comprising a lever which temporarily connects the piezoelectric actuator with the closure element,
whereby the dosing system is designed so that during a movement in a closure direction the actuating element is initially moved in a first partial movement in such a way that the actuating element is separated from the closure element at an intended stop location, and then strikes the closure element at the stop location and exerts an impulse on the closure element.
2. The dosing system according to
3. The dosing system according to
4. The dosing system according to
6. The dosing system according to
7. The dosing system according to
8. The dosing system according to
9. The dosing system according to
10. The dosing system according to
|
The present invention relates to a dosing system for a liquid or viscous dosing material. It also relates to a method of dosing a liquid or viscous dosing material.
The dispensing (more particularly of an as precisely determined amount as possible), i.e. the dosing, of liquid or viscous dosing materials, for example, adhesives, paints, printing varnishes, conductive substances bound in a binder system such as soldering pastes, converter materials for LEDs etc. is intended for the targeted application of such dosing materials, for example on target surfaces. For instance, electronic circuit boards are specifically and precisely provided with conductive substances, replacing previously necessary time-consuming and costly processes, such as scraping processes, based on masking. A particular challenge consists in the high-precision delivery of the dosing materials to the target surface, i.e. at the right time, at the right place and in a precisely dosed quantity. This can be done, for example, in that drop-wise dispensing via the nozzle of a dosing system takes place, whereby the size and/or quantity of the drops is predetermined as precisely as possible through the effect of the nozzle. Alternatively the dosing material can be sprayed on in a jet or applied as a mist.
The challenge of high-precision dosing becomes even greater if the dosing material is not an easily flowing substance, with a similar consistency to that of water, but a relatively viscous medium. Examples of these are highly enriched adhesives, strongly pigment-enriched paints or varnishes with a high proportion of pigment etc. Particularly in the case of such material and/or in situations where dosing materials are to be applied, the dosing of which must be particularly finely adjusted, it is decisive that the nozzle closes at exactly the required moment. This results in a specific drop break-off of the drops ejected by the nozzle, thereby allowing as precise dosing as possible by way of as small drops as possible.
In DE 27 17 539 A1 devices for the dosing of liquid single component adhesives are described. In these devices needle valves actuated by compressed air are used.
An adhesive application device is also described in DE 31 08 793 C2 in which the adhesive drips downwards out of a nozzle opening, whereby to assist this via an annular gap outside the nozzle compressed air is emitted which carries along the adhesive. The nozzle opening can be closed by means of a nozzle needle that is attached to a piston and through this can be moved in position.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,694,855 B2 describes a dosing system with a pneumatic actuator system, which via a lever acts on a plunger that opens and closes an outlet opening of a nozzle.
In high-precision fine applications, especially in the field of micro-dosing and particularly in the field of the above dosing materials, such systems reach their technical limits, more particularly because of the too slow mechanics.
The aim of the present invention is therefore to provide a possibility for optimising the dosing of dosing materials by means of a dosing system with a nozzle. Particular attention is paid to the fact that the dosing system and the nozzle can work more effectively and/or precisely than was previously the case. Preferably the production of smaller drop sizes than before is made possible.
Accordingly a dosing system of the type cited in the introductory section comprises an actuator system, that has at least one actuating element, and a nozzle with an outlet opening, whereby during a movement in a closure direction, the actuating element is moved in a first partial movement in such a way that it is separated from the closure element by a stop location intended for such a purpose, and then comes into contact with the closure element at the stop location and exerts an impulse on the closure element.
For this the actuator system is preferably arranged in an actuator area, specially provided for this, which is, if possible, spatially separated from the nozzle area. As actuator system is defined as a system that comprises at least one (preferably automatic) actuator. The actuating element itself can be the actuator if it acts on the closure element directly at the stop location, or the actuating element comprises a mechanical force-transmission element that is directly or indirectly coupled to an actuator and therefore transmits forces and/or movements of the actuator onto the closure element. Thus, for example, the actuating element can have a catch and/or a lever. In other words the actuating element operates the closure element directly via a temporary contact on the stop location.
Designated as the stop location is the specially provided contact area between the actuating element and the closure element, which is intended for the purpose of specific force and/or movement transmission, i.e. for impulse transmission, between the actuating element and the closure element. A single point of contact, as well as a linear or flat contact can therefore also serve as a stop location.
Defined as a closure element is a one-piece or multiple-piece mechanical element, that is preferably elongated in shape, for example cylindrical, thus for instance a plunger using silicon for example. It can however also be a round or oval closure element that closes a closure channel and/or the outlet opening in a (closing) position. A closure channel in this connection is a hollow body, preferably a cylindrical hollow body which on its inside defines, i.e. encloses, a hollow space, within which the closure element is arranged, at least partially, so that the closure element closes the hollow space.
The closure element can, for example, operated by the actuator system, be moved in an opening and/or a closure direction. A to and fro movement of the closure element is thus produced, for which it is movably arranged and borne in these two directions of movement.
In accordance with the invention such a system is now designed in such a way that the movement of the actuating element can be divided into at least two partial movements: in a first partial movement the actuating element is moved, preferably in a contact-free manner, independently of the closure element. During this first partial movement the actuating element is (still) separated at a stop location, intended for this purpose, from the closure element. The actuating element is then (at the end of this first partial movement) brought into contact with the closure element at the stop location and thereby transmits an impulse. The actuating element and the closure element then jointly complete a second partial movement in the closure direction, whereby during this second partial movement they do not necessarily have to be in contact at the stop location. There can therefore simply be an impulse transmission to the closure element that results in the closure element moving more quickly in the closure direction than the actuating element. However, during the second partial movement both elements can also move jointly in contact with each other over a certain period of time, preferably as far as the end position of the closure element, in which the closure element fully closes the nozzle of the dosing system. This end position is reached, in particular, when the closure element is positioned on an outlet opening of the nozzle so that the latter is closed by the closure element.
Such temporary coupling and de-coupling, i.e. the connection and separation of the actuating element and closure element means that the actuator system, more particularly the actuating element, at the time of de-coupling from the closure element can build up an advance velocity, i.e. is already accelerated, before it comes into contact with the closure element at the stop location. This advance velocity can then specifically be used to build up an impulse which is then transmitted to the closure element. This finally results in a higher final speed of the closure element in the closure direction than if the actuating element and the closure element were to travel the same path in contact at the stop location, which the closure element travels here after the impulse transmission. This has the effect that the closure element exerts its closing effects more quickly and effectively, thereby achieving the desired precise and rapid drop break-off. In this way smaller drop sizes are also made possible.
Whereas in the prior art constant coupling of the actuating element of the actuator system with the closure element in the closure direction is envisaged, the present invention specifically turns away from this permanently connected system and replaces it with an only temporary connection and mechanical decoupling of the actuating and closure element. The two elements can therefore travel independent paths at times, which when they come together at the right time mean that the velocity of the closure element in the closure direction is greater, though the path of the closure element in the direction of its end position, i.e. the closing position is much shorter.
A method of the type set out in the introduction can be further developed in that it is implemented with the aid of a dosing system that comprises an actuator system having at least one actuating element, and a nozzle with an outlet opening. The actuating element is initially moved in a closure direction in a first partial movement in such a way that it is separated from the closure element at a stop location and then comes into contact with the closure element at the stop location and transmits an impulse to the closure element.
Further advantageous embodiments and further developments of the invention are set out as well as the following description. The method can also be further developed for the dosing system and further developed in accordance with the following description.
Within the context of the invention it is preferred to design, arrange and limit the actuator system and the closure element so that in operation the actuating element and the closure element travel a different maximum path. The actuating element and the closure element therefore have a different, limited, travel path. Here, it is particularly preferably that a maximum path of the closure element is smaller than a maximum path of the actuating element. In general it can be said that the greater the difference between the travel path of the actuating element and that of the closure element, the greater the impulse transmitted when the actuating element comes into contact with the closure element during the closing movement in the closure direction. The greater the impulse during this impact the more quickly the closure element is moved in the direction of its intended end position.
On its path to reach the closure element at the stop location, the actuating element builds up a kinetic energy, which acts on the closure element on impact. This produces an impulse and ultimately much greater acceleration of the closure element, than if the actuating element had travelled the entire path jointly with the closure element of the actuating element.
In tests it has been shown that the travel path, i.e. the maximum path, of the actuating element, is at least 1.1 times, particularly preferably at least twice as large as the travel path of the closure element.
In operation the closing speed of the closure element is preferably more than 0.5 m/s.
In one test set-up the closure element had a mass of 1 g (including spring) and the actuating element a mass of 3.5 g (typical values ranged from 3.5 to 10 g), and a driving force (assumed to be constant) of 250 N acted on the actuating element. The total path of the actuating element was 0.3 mm, the total path of the closure element in a first scenario was 0.09 mm and in a second scenario 0.15 mm, i.e. half of the total path.
This results in the following values:
In the first scenario the actuating element developed a speed of 5.5 m/s, in the second scenario 4.6 m/s. In the first scenario the closure element was accelerated to a speed of 7.7 m/s (on reaching the outlet opening), in the second scenario to 6.4 m/s. These values take into account the effect losses during impulse transmission, otherwise they would have been 20% higher. If the two had travelled the same path of the closure element, in the first scenario a joint speed of 3.1 m/s and in the second scenario 4 m/s would have resulted. The reduced travel path of the closure element (and thus its low ability build up speed over the short distance), is therefore balanced out by the impulse transmission by the actuating element so that a sudden, very fast impact is produced. In summary it can be stated that with a travel path of the actuating element double that of the closure element a very good increase speed of the closure element can be achieved.
A different travel path of the actuating element and of the closure element can be realized, for example, in that the closure element is limited by a stop device in its maximum path along an axis of the closure direction. Such a stop device can, for instance, be a firmly installed stop surface within the housing of the dosing system or generally a firmly installed stop location. It can however, and this is preferred, be a stop device the position of which can be changed, for example a stop screw which be screwed into the housing the direction of the closure element or screwed out away from the closure element.
A further development of such an adjustable stop device consists, for example, in that it is an automatic, preferably motorized, adjustable stop device. A motorized stop device can for example be adjusted by a servomotor. Other automatic stop devices include mechanically, for example, hydraulically or pneumatically operated adjustable stop devices, preferably operated from outside the dosing system.
In the case of an automatically adjustable stop device, by way of appropriate measuring devices, a position of the stop device or a force relationship within the dosing system, particularly with regard to the forces of the closure element on the stop device, can be determined. The generated data, whether position data or measuring data representing occurring forces, can be used as the basis for adjusting the position of the stop device. Advantageously this can take place within a closed control loop, so that in the event of too high forces of the closure element on the stop device, adjustment can take place so that the stop device is positioned further away from the closure element.
In accordance with a first variant the actuator system comprises a hydraulically and/or pneumatically operated actuator. Such an actuator can for example be designed as a cylinder-piston system, in which via one or two inlets a high pressure or low pressure can be set. However, other mechanical actuator systems, based on other mechanical actuators are also possible, for example operated by gears etc.
A second variant that can be selected additionally or alternative to the first variant consists in the actuator system being electrically or electronically operated. Here it is particularly preferable that the actuator system has a piezoelectric actuator. Electrical, but particularly electronic actuators and very particularly piezoelectric actuators are very fast and effective in terms of effect and can thus be particularly effectively used in micro-dosing system and in case of the ultrafine dosage resolutions required here.
As has been mentioned, the actuating element can simply be an actuator that temporarily acts directly on the closure element. In addition to an actuator, a further force transmission element, for example a catch, can be provided. Particularly preferably the actuating element has a lever which temporarily connects the actuator with the closure element. In addition to the force transmission from the actuator to the closure element, a lever of this type has the additional advantage that it can produce a transfer effect so that, for example, a smaller travel path of the actuator is sufficient in order, through appropriate transfer via the lever, to bring about a larger travel path in the area of the closure element, i.e. along the effect axis of the closure element.
In general it is preferred that a maximum operating path of an actuator of the actuator system differs from the maximum path of the closure element, and particularly preferably is larger than that of the closure element. This means that even if the actuator does not act directly on the closure element, its travel path is greater than that of the closure element. In this way a larger travel path of the actuating element can also be achieved.
It has also been proven as advantageous if a maximum travel path of an actuator of the actuator system and/or a maximum path of the actuating element is limited by a stop device. Here, the term stop device can be very broadly interpreted: a stop device can (as has already been described) be a mechanical element, on which the actuator of the actuating system and/or the actuating element comes into contact in a certain position. However, a stop device can also be realized through appropriate programming or pre-setting of a control of the actuator, i.e. by means of software, for example. Here it is sufficient to use electronic path control in the form of path limiting. Overall, through limiting the path of the actuator of the actuator system and/or of the actuating element it is ensured that the paths of the actuator and the closure element can be adjusted in a defined manner and thus the forces occurring between the actuating element and the closure element can be estimated and defined beforehand.
In addition to the actuator system which moves the actuating element and ultimately the closure element in at least the closure direction, it can be envisaged that the closure element and/or the actuator system is pushed in an opening direction and/or in the closure direction in a spring manner. Such spring-based force exertion on the actuating element and respectivlely on the closure element can, for example when acting in the opening direction, cause the closure element and/or the actuating element to be pushed back into an opening position so that for this movement a separate automatic actuator is not necessary. In this way the dosing system is more simply and effectively designed.
In order to keep a stop device positioned at all times in such a way that it exerts its limiting effect on the path of the actuator system and/or the closure element, it is preferably envisaged that its position can be adjusted and particularly preferably is spring-preloaded. The stop device is not therefore firmly installed, but can be varied in position and then fixed. Spring-loaded fixing has proven to be a simple measure in order to do this.
The invention will be described again in more detail below with reference to the attached figures. In the various figures the same components have identical reference numbers. In these:
In this form of embodiment the actuator system 2 is in the form of a pneumatic or hydraulic system. This means that an actuator 29 of an actuator system 2 acting as an actuating element 29 can be moved to and fro by pressurised gas or pressurised fluid in a cylinder, in which are located an upper chamber 35a and a lower chamber 35b, which are separated from one another by the actuator 29 designed in the form of a piston 29. The upper chamber 35a and the lower chamber 35b are each supplied by high pressure and low pressure via a first pneumatic inlet 7a and second pneumatic inlet 7b. The first pneumatic inlet 7a leads into the upper chamber 35a and the second pneumatic inlet 7b leads into the lower chamber 35b. If a fluid or a gas is supplied to the first chamber 35a through the first pneumatic inlet 7a with a higher pressure than a pressure that is present over the second inlet 7b in the lower chamber 35b, the piston 29 moves in the direction of the lower chamber 35b. In the case of an opposite pressure ratio the piston 29 moves in the direction of the upper chamber 35a. The movement of the piston 29 downwards in the direction of the outlet opening 19 is additionally supported by an actuator spring 33 which is arranged in the upper chamber 35a so that it pushes the piston 29 downwards.
The piston 29 is designed in one piece and has three sections, namely a lower actuator section 29a, a middle actuator section 29b and an upper actuator section 29c. The middle actuator section 29b is the area of the piston 29 that separates the upper chamber 35a from the lower chamber 35b, while the lower actuator section 29a and the upper actuator section 29c are guided within the housing of the dosing system 1 within cylindrical hollow spaces. The lower actuator section 29a is functionally connected with the plunger 15. This takes place by way of a positive and non-positive connection, which, among other things, consists in the plunger 15 being in contact along a stop location 31, namely along a stop surface 31 directly on the underside of the lower actuator section 29a. For this the plunger 15 has an expanding section 27, the cross-section of which perpendicularly to the closure direction V is larger than the sections of the plunger 15 lying above and below the expanding section 27. The part of the plunger 15 above the expanding area 27 projects into a hollow space 37 within the piston 29 so that the form-fit between the plunger 15 and the piston 29 extends further than just in the area of the stop location 31. The plunger 15 is therefore held with its upper side within the piston 29. On the side of the expanded section 27 facing away from the piston 29 it is also held in an axial alignment along the effect axis X by means of an alignment device 23. Via a circumferential seal 21 it moves into the area of dosing material channel 17 which leads from a supply line 11 in the direction of the outlet opening 19 of the nozzle 13.
The positive or non-positive connection between plunger 15 and the piston 29 along the stop surface 31 is assured by a closure element spring 25 which extends from the alignment device 23 to the expanding section 27 of the plunger 15 and always keeps the latter in connection with the piston 29 in this area. A vent opening 9 serves to equalize high and/or low pressures during movements of the plunger 15.
The dosing system 1 also has a stop device 3 in the form of a stop screw 3 which can, via a thread 41, be screwed in the direction of the interior of the housing of the dosing system 1 hereby limiting the travel path Ha of the piston 29. The stop screw 3 is held in its position by means of a stop spring 5 and can only be moved further into the interior of the housing of the dosing system 1 or moved further out from the interior of the dosing system 1 in a targeted manner. The piston 29 can thereby only be moved as far as the actuator impact location 39 of the stop screw 3 on its end facing the piston 29.
If the upwards movement in the opening direction shown by way of
If the piezoelectric actuator 55 is stimulated to move, this movement is transformed via the first support area 63 into a rotary movement. With this the plunger 15 is moved along the effect axis X in the closure direction with the aid of the contact at the stop location 31. The path of the piezoelectric actuator 55 is not necessarily the same as path H1′, travelled by the lever 57 as actuating element 57 along effect axis X. Rather, through appropriate transmission, a larger path H1′ can be travelled along axis X. There is therefore a first path H1 along actuator axis Y of the piezoelectric actuator 55 and a second path H1′ along the effect axis X of the plunger 15.
On its upper side the plunger 15 is in turn stopped by a stop device 43 at a plunger impact location 47. It therefore has a path H2 that is smaller than the path H1′ of the lever 57 along the effect axis X. Also as soon as the position shown here is reached during a movement in the opening direction, the stop lever 57 moves away from the stop location 31 and is separated from the plunger 15; the lever 57 travels on upwards by itself. In the other direction the lever 57 initially moves along in the direction of the plunger 15, comes into contact with the latter at the stop location 31 and moves it with an impulse further in the direction of an outlet opening of a nozzle. This principle essentially corresponds to the sequence that has already been explained by way of
Whereas the example of embodiment shown by way of
Finally it is again pointed out that the components of the dosing system and nozzle and of the actuator system described in detail above are purely examples of an embodiment, which can be modified by a person skilled in art in the most varied of ways without departing from the scope of the invention. Furthermore the use of the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not preclude the relevant feature being able to be present as a plurality. “Units” can also consist of one or more, including spatially distributed, components.
Fliess, Mario, Staedtler, Juergen
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10144031, | Mar 03 2016 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Fluid ejection device |
10400071, | Nov 09 2015 | WACKER Chemie AG | Silicone compositions for producing elastomeric molded parts by means of ballistic methods |
10434535, | Mar 03 2016 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Fluid ejection device |
10471653, | Nov 06 2014 | WACKER Chemie AG | Method for producing silicone elastomer parts |
10486172, | Dec 08 2009 | Nordson Corporation | Force amplifying driver system, jetting dispenser, and method of dispensing fluid |
10906061, | Feb 26 2018 | PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO., LTD. | Coating method, coating apparatus and method for manufacturing component |
11305311, | Feb 26 2018 | PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO., LTD. | Coating method, coating apparatus and method for manufacturing component |
11401438, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS GMBH | Method of applying a coating composition to a substrate |
11453802, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS GMBH | Method of applying a coating composition to a substrate |
11566146, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11613669, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11648197, | Jun 28 2018 | ARx, LLC | Dispensing method for producing dissolvable unit dose film constructs |
11649371, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS GMBH | Method of forming a coating composition for application to a substrate utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator |
11649372, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11649373, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11649374, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11655391, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO , LLC | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11820910, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS GMBH | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11839897, | May 11 2021 | TRIPLE WIN TECHNOLOGY(SHENZHEN) CO. LTD. | Glue dispensing device |
11840639, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11945964, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC | Coating compositions for application utilizing a high transfer efficiency applicator and methods and systems thereof |
11965107, | Nov 30 2017 | AXALTA COATING SYSTEMS IP CO., LLC | System for applying a coating composition |
9573157, | Nov 18 2014 | PROTEC CO., LTD; PROTEC CO , LTD | Piezo-pneumatic valve driving type dispensing pump and method of dispensing viscous liquid by using the pump |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5022556, | Oct 25 1989 | Raytheon Company | Programmable volume dispensing apparatus |
5152678, | Nov 27 1991 | Milton Roy, LLC | Fluid sampling pump |
5320250, | Dec 02 1991 | Asymptotic Technologies, Inc. | Method for rapid dispensing of minute quantities of viscous material |
5467899, | Feb 08 1994 | Liquid Control Corporation | Dispensing device for flowable materials |
6595436, | May 08 2001 | Cummins Engine Company, Inc. | Proportional needle control injector |
7694855, | Apr 23 2004 | Nordson Corporation | Dispenser having a pivoting actuator assembly |
8322575, | Oct 28 2004 | Nordson Corporation | Device for dispensing a heated liquid |
8448818, | Mar 30 2007 | MUSASHI ENGINEERING, INC | Drop forming discharge device having collision member and method of using same |
8807400, | Mar 30 2007 | Musashi Engineering, Inc. | Liquid droplet discharging device having advanced position specifying mechanism |
20050230438, | |||
20080061080, | |||
20100294810, | |||
20120061426, | |||
20130233891, | |||
CN201552079, | |||
DE2717539, | |||
DE3108793, | |||
EP1588777, | |||
EP1652588, | |||
JP3170817, | |||
WO2008126373, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 05 2012 | VERMES MICRODISPENSING GMBH | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 11 2014 | FLIESS, MARIO | VERMES MICRODISPENSING GMBH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032083 | /0043 | |
Jan 17 2014 | STAEDTLER, JUERGEN | VERMES MICRODISPENSING GMBH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032083 | /0043 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 24 2019 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 18 2023 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 17 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 17 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 17 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 17 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 17 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 17 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 17 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 17 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 17 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 17 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 17 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 17 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |