A separator system (5) comprising; a separation chamber (10) arranged to separate liquid from an inflow production fluid (45); at least one gas scrubber (15) for removing entrained liquid from a separated gas inflow from said separation chamber (10); wherein said at least one gas scrubber (15) is positioned above and proximate to said separation chamber (10), said gas scrubber (15) and separation chamber (10) connectable through a vertically oriented at least one liquid outflow conduit (20) arranged to direct the removed entrained liquid from the gas scrubber (15) to the separation chamber (10) wherein the conduit (20), is arranged such that an outflow end (22) of said conduit (20) extends into the separation chamber 10(10) such that it is lower than a minimum threshold liquid depth (65) in said separation chamber 10(10).
|
1. A separator system (5) comprising;
a separation chamber (10) arranged to separate liquid from an inflow production fluid (45);
at least one gas scrubber (15) for removing entrained liquid from both an external gas inflow and a separated gas inflow from said separation chamber (10);
wherein said at least one gas scrubber (15) is positioned above and proximate to said separation chamber (10), said gas scrubber (15) and separation chamber (10) connectable through a vertically oriented at least one liquid outflow conduit (20) arranged to direct the removed entrained liquid from the gas scrubber (15) to the separation chamber (10) wherein the conduit (20) is arranged such that an outflow end (22) of said conduit (20) extends into the separation chamber (10) such that it is lower than a minimum threshold liquid depth (65) in said separation chamber (10);
wherein a connecting pipe (25) includes an inlet distribution device (35) proximate to the gas scrubber (15) for dissipating the separated gas inflow into said gas scrubber, and;
further including a wax removal system (26) mounted to said connecting pipe (25), said wax removal system (26) arranged to direct a jet of hot fluid onto said inlet distribution device (35), said fluid comprising any one, or a combination, of water, steam, diesel or solvent.
25. A separator system (5) comprising:
a separation chamber (10) arranged to separate liquid from an inflow production fluid (45);
at least one gas scrubber (15) for removing entrained liquid from both an external gas inflow and a separated gas inflow from said separation chamber (10);
wherein said at least one gas scrubber (15) is positioned above and proximate to said separation chamber (10), said gas scrubber (15) and separation chamber (10) connectable through a vertically oriented at least one liquid outflow conduit (20) arranged to direct the removed entrained liquid from the gas scrubber (15) to the separation chamber (10) wherein the conduit (20) is arranged such that an outflow end (22) of said conduit (20) extends into the separation chamber (10) such that it is lower than a minimum threshold liquid depth (65) in said separation chamber (10);
further comprising a slug handling device (320), said slug handling device (320) comprising a separation device (340) for receiving the inflow production fluid (335) through an inlet pipe, said separation device (340) inclined to the horizontal and arranged to separate a gas stream and liquid stream;
a stilling well (350) for receiving the separated liquid and routing aid separated liquid to separator chamber;
a gas bypass line (342) connecting the separation device (340) and the gas scrubber (330) arranged to rout the separated gas stream to the gas scrubber and consequently equalize pressure between said separation device and gas scrubber;
wherein the slug handling device is positioned above the separator chamber (325) such that a normal liquid level (346) in the stilling well provides sufficient liquid head (386) to overcome a pressure drop due to liquid flow from the stilling well to the separator chamber, and;
the stilling well includes a sand removal assembly (435) within said sand trap, said sand trap assembly including at least cyclonic device (442) within said sand trap for agitating sand into suspension, and an outlet for discharging liquid having the sand in suspension;
said sand removal assembly having an intermediate sand trap (444) having a further valve controlled outlet (445) arranged such that the liquid is discharged to the intermediate sand trap (444), prior to final discharge.
2. The separator system (5) according to
3. The separator system (5) according to
4. The separator system (5) according to
5. The separator system (5) according to
6. The separator system (5) according to
7. The separator system (5) according to
8. The separator system (5) according to
9. The separator system according to
10. The separator system according to
11. The separator system according to
12. The separator system according to
a slug handling device (320), said slug handling device (320) comprising a separation device (340) for receiving the inflow production fluid (335) through an inlet pipe, said separation device (340) inclined to the horizontal and arranged to separate a gas stream and liquid stream;
a stilling well (350) for receiving the separated liquid and routing said separated liquid to separator chamber (325);
a gas bypass line (342) connecting the separation device (340) and the gas scrubber (330) arranged to rout the separated gas stream to the gas scrubber and consequently equalize pressure between said separation device and gas scrubber;
wherein the slug handling device is positioned above the separator chamber (325) such that a normal liquid level (346) in the stilling well provides sufficient liquid head (386) to overcome a pressure drop due to liquid flow from the stilling well to the separator chamber.
13. A separator system according to
14. A separator according to
15. The separator according to
16. The separator system according to
17. The separator system according to
18. The separator system according to
19. The separator system according to
20. The separator device according to
21. The separator device according to
22. The separator device according to
23. The separator device according to
24. The separator device according to
26. The separator device according to
|
This application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/IB2012/000128 filed Jan. 30, 2012, which designated the U.S. and claims priority to PI 2011000489 filed Jan. 31, 2011, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a system and method for the separation of gas and liquid, and particularly relates to applications for the oil and gas industry. In particular, the invention relates to a separator, and method of separation, in order to isolate gas, oil and water from a natural inflow prior to the refining process.
A conventional means of separating gas, oil and water is using a three-phase separator. However, field experience indicates that many of these systems experience significant liquid carry-over which has resulted in problems and damage of downstream facilities like the gas compressions. To mitigate this, an additional polishing scrubber is generally provided downstream of the bulk gas/liquid or gas, oil and water separators. This adds to space, weight and instrumentation (due to additional level monitoring and control) which in turn results in increased cost. The reliability, availability and maintainability of the system are also reduced due to the additional equipment and associated instrumentation.
For facilities where the inlet fluid is from a pipeline, slug flow in the pipeline results in significant sloshing, liquid entrainment and a drastic change in liquid level at the inlet separator. This turbulence at the inlet separator may result in a significant amount of liquid collecting around the gas outlet device at the separator. This, in turn, will result in both high liquid entrainment into the gas stream out of the separator and also potential blockage of the separator outlet device particularly if the liquid is waxy.
The blockages occur as a result of cold spots at the gas outlet device; with the effect made worse by the normally small flow path associated with the internals. “Sloshing” of the liquid phase may also lead to liquid coming into contact with the gas outlet device. For separators on a Floating Production Storage and Unloading Unit (FPSO), this is more pronounced as the ship's motion leads to greater movement of the liquid phase. If the liquid entrained in the gas stream is waxy, there is no means of removing the wax that builds up at the device unless the separator is taken offline, and the outlet device disassembled.
The need for high efficiency separation of the gas from the entrained liquids, for most applications, results in highly efficient gas outlet devices, or internals, being required at the separator. These internals may be mist mats, vane packs, cyclonic devices or other proprietary internals. However to accommodate the gas outlet device within the separator, the vapor space in the separator needs to be large enough to accommodate the device. This increases the size of the separator.
In particular, waxy crude that forms gel or crystalline structure at lower temperatures normally leads to a number of operational problems especially the ability of the fluid to flow and clogging of the instruments and internals that is integral to the performance of the equipment.
For facilities that handle waxy crude it is ubiquitous to inject Pour Point Depressant (PPD) to lower the pour point temperatures, and to maintain high production fluid temperatures in the equipments, pipes and instruments that handles the waxy crude. However it is unavoidable that some cold spots will develop within the system. These cold spots are located within the equipment or pipeline that experiences temperatures lower than the bulk fluid temperature. These cold spots are more prevalent in the gas phase where the specific heat of the gas is low. Low specific heat means that the gas gains or loses temperature faster.
The separation chamber, which receives the production fluid, is typically a three phase separator that carries out course separation of the production fluid into its individual phases. The problem of wax is compounded within all such separation, as the gas phase internals are normally built into the inlet separator and consists of small flow paths and parts, and further, with the gas phase in direct contact with the oil phase. Also, it has been found that slugging, or surges, lead to more liquids carryover in the gas phase.
For specific FPSO applications, the motion of the vessel may make the above problem worse.
Furthermore, there is no means for early detection of the waxing problems, and no means to fix the problem online if the wax begins to form.
And when wax begins to form, the problem is self propagating. Typically to mitigate liquid carry-over problems, a downstream gas scrubber is provided with liquid collected pumped back to the separator. This however increases the space and weight requirements and in addition increases the control, operational & maintenance complexity of the system.
A further problem involves slugging which is a challenging problem for many crude oil production receiving facilities particularly those receiving production from multi-phase subsea pipelines as they are susceptible to slugs. This is particularly the case for production facilities receiving crude and associated gas from remote wells via pipelines and risers. Slugs generated in the pipelines and risers not only require processing facilities to be increased in size to accommodate the slugs, but also results in production upsets associated with the high speed at which the slugs arrive and the transient pressure fluctuations due to the surge of gas following the arrival of the slug. Under these scenarios the production facilities like inlet heat exchangers, production separators and downstream gas compressors generally will not be able to cope with this transient slugging phenomenon resulting in production upsets and possibly shutdown.
Slugging results in the compression of the gas phase behind a slug. The transportation of a slug requires a larger pressure behind the slug to keep the slug moving through the pipeline and riser. This pressure increase depends on the size of the liquid slug. After the slug arrives at the outlet of the pipeline or production platform, the compressed gas creates a large gas surge, which again may result in major upsets in topside facilities, like the downstream gas compression trains.
The production from the remote wells, usually comprising large slug volumes is transported to the heat exchanger via pipelines or risers. Without any effective separation upstream, the slug flow conditions at the heater results in large heating duties of the exchanger as both the gas stream and the liquid streams are heated. The excessive heating duties results in poor performance of the heat exchanger, thus waxy crude and emulsions are still of existence in the outlet stream. Furthermore, the system experiences large pressure drop as the heating duty is high.
On the other hand, the existence of waxy crude and emulsions will cause blockages at the inlet and outlets of the separator. Although the separation of oil, gas and water can be performed, the exiting gas stream will comprise significant liquid entrainment that will cause damage to the condensing system, resulting in system shutdown. Hence, the reliability of the separator system is very low. In addition, these turbulences and the ineffective heating of the inlet fluids leading to the presence of water emulsion, inherent with multiphase fluids under slugging conditions will also result improper oil water separation in the separator. This will require the downstream system to be upsized due to excessive water carry-over in oil stream and excessive oil carry-over in the water stream.
Furthermore, the presence of sand in the production fluid often results in sand build-up in the downstream separator which in turn possibly requires frequent shutdowns to remove sand from the separator or requires sand removal devices to be installed at the separator which are expensive.
In a first aspect, a separator system comprising; a separation chamber arranged to separate liquid from an inflow production fluid; at least one gas scrubber for removing entrained liquid from a separated gas inflow from said separation chamber; wherein said at least one gas scrubber is positioned above and proximate to said separation chamber, said gas scrubber and separation chamber connectable through a vertically oriented at least one liquid outflow conduit arranged to direct the removed entrained liquid from the gas scrubber to the separation chamber wherein the conduit is arranged such that an outflow end of said conduit extends into the separation chamber such that it is lower than a minimum threshold liquid depth 65 in said separation chamber.
With the separator having a gas scrubber in close proximity, the ability to more efficiently recycle liquid, the invention is able to reduce space and save on capital infrastructure costs, providing advantage over the prior art.
In one embodiment, by actually mounting the scrubber to the separation chamber, further space savings may be achieved.
In a further embodiment, the conduit may be arranged such that an outflow end of said conduit extends into the separation chamber. Further, the outflow end will extend into the separation chamber such that it is lower than a minimum threshold water depth in said separation chamber.
In one embodiment, the separator system may include a slug handling device for managing and/or removing slugs from the inflow production fluid. The slug handling device may include a separation device receiving the inflow production fluid through an inlet pipe. The separation device may be inclined to promote gravity flow, so as to separate a gas stream and liquid stream through gravity. The slug handling device will include a stilling well for receiving the separated liquid.
The said stilling well may have a sand trap so as to allow solids within said separated liquid to settle through gravity. The stilling well may also include an outlet above the sand trap so as to discharge said separated liquid to the separation chamber.
The slug handling device may be a separator arranged to create a stratified flow regime and with total hold-up volume sized to accommodate the anticipated slug volume for said inflow production fluid so as to yield the separation of the gas stream and liquid stream. Alternatively, the slug handling device may include a pipe having an expanded diameter, such as having a diameter larger than the diameter of the inlet pipe. This expanded diameter may be sized so as to achieve the stratified flow regime and with total hold-up volume sized to accommodate the anticipated slug volume.
In a further embodiment, the slug handling device may also include a gas bypass pipe for routing separated gas from the separation device to gas scrubber.
The stilling well will have the outlet located above the sand trap, and further the pipe may be inclined upwards so as to prevent sand from exiting said stilling well. Further, the outlet may include a control valve for controlling the flow of liquid to the separator chamber.
In one embodiment, the stilling well may include a sand removal assembly within the sand trap, said sand trap assembly including at least cyclonic device for agitating sand into suspension, and a valve controlled outlet for discharging liquid having the sand in suspension. In effect, having the sand in suspension allows the sand to be moved by flowing the liquid out of the sand trap, and thus using the liquid as a sand removal medium. Further, the sand removal assembly may also have an intermediate sand trap having a further valve controlled outlet arranged such that the liquid is discharged to the intermediate sand trap, prior to final discharge. Further still, the intermediate sand trap includes a further cyclonic device for agitating liquid in the intermediate sand trap prior to final discharge.
It will be convenient to further describe the present invention with respect to the accompanying drawings that illustrate possible arrangements of the invention. Other arrangements of the invention are possible, and consequently the particularity of the accompanying drawings is not to be understood as superseding the generality of the preceding description of the invention.
The invention provides a separator developed for the oil and gas industry where a two phase (gas and liquid) or 3 phase (gas, oil and water) separator which, in various embodiments, may have the advantages of providing high liquid droplet removal efficiency, may be compact with minimal space and weight and may require less controls and instrumentations. The system may be suitable for both onshore and offshore applications where space is limited and may be suitable for waxy and fouling fluid services and for facilities where motion effects are high, e.g. FPSOs.
The separator chamber 10 is similar to a three phase gas-liquid separator whereby production fluid 45 comprising a gas and liquid phase passes into the separation chamber 10 through an inlet device 75. The separation chamber 10 includes separate chambers where the separated liquid forms a liquid pad in the base of the chamber which is divided by a barrier 70 into the water phase which is drained 50 for treatment and a crude oil phase which is drained 60 for processing.
The difference between the present invention and the conventional system lies in the placement of a gas scrubber 15 mounted above the separation chamber 10 and connected through a connecting pipe 25 to flow gas from the gas phase in the separation chamber 10 through to the gas scrubber 15 whereby a further separation process occurs through gas polishing to remove remnant liquid from the gas which is drained through a vertically oriented liquid conduit, or downcomer pipe 20, back into the separation chamber 10. The gas then exits through an gas outlet demisting device 80 to the gas outlet line 55 for further processing.
The termination 22 of the downcomer pipe 20 is to be below the low liquid level 65 in the horizontal separator 10 to ensure that gas does not bypass the separator 10 via the downcomer pipe 20 under all operating conditions. To avoid accumulation of oil phase in the downcomer pipe, the pipe may be terminated above the high oil-water interface level of the horizontal separator 10. The pressure drop of the gas from the horizontal separator section 10 to the vertical scrubber section 15, including the scrubber inlet device 35 is to be less than the static liquid head in the downcomer pipe 20 from high liquid level in the horizontal separator to the bottom of the vertical scrubber. This will ensure that liquid from the liquid pad of the separator section does not rise up the downcomer pipe to the scrubber, due to siphon effect.
Since the separator 10 and scrubber 15 share a common liquid pad within the separator, the scrubber need not have a liquid collection booth. This minimizes the size and height of the scrubber 15.
A differential pressure transmitter 40 between the scrubber section 15 and separator section 10 enables the system to monitor the level of liquid in the downcomer pipe and to trouble-shoot the system.
The separator system 5 is arranged to have the horizontal vessel, or separation chamber 10, piggy backed with a vertical gas scrubber 15. The bulk gas/liquid separation will be in the horizontal part 10 of the system 5 while gas scrubbing/polishing is performed in the vertical part 15 of the system. Gas, with entrained liquid, will exit the horizontal separator section 10 via an outlet deflector plate 30. In this embodiment, a speciality gas outlet device like a mist mat, vane pack, etc is not provided at the gas outlet section 30 of the horizontal separator section 10 for the following reasons:
An expanded connecting pipe 25, sized to minimize pressure drop routes gas (with entrained liquid) to the vertical gas scrubber section.
The vertical gas scrubber section 15 is sized for the process conditions and gas flow and liquid carry-over from the horizontal separator section 10. The scrubber 15 is provided with typical internals designed to enhance gas liquid separation. An inlet distributor 35 is provided at the scrubber to reduce the inlet velocity and to give a good gas distribution in the vessel. An outlet device 80, which in this case may be a gas outlet demisting device having a mist mat, vane pack, cyclonic or other proprietary internals depending on the specific application requirements.
A heat exchanging device may also be incorporated into the gas scrubber. Such a heat exchanger (not shown) may be arranged to dissipate heat from the inflow of gas. Alternatively, a heat exchanger within the body of the gas scrubber may be used so as to dissipate heat from gas within the scrubber. Conventional heat exchangers may be used for this purpose. The scrubber section may thus also function to cool the gas stream (separated gas inflow) and for final liquid droplet removal from the gas stream. This may avoid the need to provide an additional cooler downstream of the scrubber section prior to routing to the downstream processing facilities.
In the case when the production liquid is waxy or fouling, a wax or fouling matter removal system 26, comprising a nozzle mounted to the inlet or connecting pipe 25, may be provided to enable hot water flushing of the inlet device 35 (due to wax blockage) as required. Potential blockage or flow restriction at the inlet device 35 is monitored by the differential pressure transmitter 40. High differential pressure may signify fouling at the inlet device 35 of the gas scrubber due to wax deposition, etc. In addition, the wax removal system 26 may also be provided at the gas outlet device liquid draining compartment to remove blockages/restrictions as required. Whilst hot water may be used for the removal of wax, in fact any one or a combination of water, steam, diesel or any other solvent may also be used.
The advantages with combining the two sections 10, 15 may include:
Various embodiments of the present invention comprise the following components:
It would be appreciated that the scrubber 95 may be mounted directly to the separation chamber 90 as shown in
The separation vessel 85 functions in the following manner:
One alternative configuration to the above option is to have a horizontal gas separation section so that the separator vessel will have a lower overall height as shown in
Here the separation chamber 90 is configured in the same way that of the embodiment of
A typical crude stabilization train comprises 2 to 3 stages of separation and the flash gas from the 3-phase separators are re-compressed. Conventionally, this is achieved through multi stages of 3-phase separator operating at progressively lower pressure to meet the vapor pressure specification of the product crude where the outlet gas stream passes through gas scrubbers just upstream of the compressor suction for final polishing and to provide surge volume.
The crude stabilization train 185 shown in
The crude is sent 220 to the second stage 195 via an inter-stage heater 245 where it is received by a second separator chamber 250. Gas sent 270 to the second gas scrubber 265 is scrubbed and delivered 280 to a flash gas compressor 240 which cools 235 the gas before delivering back to the first scrubber 212. Water is drained 255 and the subsequent crude sent to the third stage 200 to be received by the third separation chamber 290 which removes 305 the final gas to the third gas scrubber 300 and delivers 285 the crude for processing.
The gas removed from the third stage 200 is sent to a second flash gas compressor 285 which cools 275 the gas before delivering it to the second gas scrubber 265.
Thus, a three-stage process of continually separating and scrubbing the gas is substantially reduced in its footprint and with the proximity of the three-stages with the corresponding gas scrubbers substantial savings in capital infrastructure and instrumentation may also be achieved.
Table 1 below shows the comparison of the size of the separators/scrubbers for the 2 options based on a typical production facility.
TABLE #1
Size Comparison
Vessel Size
Conventional
Embodiments
1st Stage Separator
4.2 m × 12 m
3.7 m × 9.7 m
2nd Stage Separator
3.0 m × 10.1 m
3.0 m × 9.3 m
3rd Stage Separator
3.0 m × 9.5 m
3.0 m × 8.9 m
1st Stage Scrubber
2.7 m × 3.7 m
1.9 m × 2.5 m
2nd Stage Scrubber
1.2 m × 3.9 m
1.0 m × 2.5 m
3rd Stage Scrubber
1.4 m × 3.5 m
1.0 m × 2.5 m
It indicates that with the separators of the present invention, there is significant size and weight benefits to the system resulting in a compact crude stabilization train. As the scrubbers are located above the respective separators, further significant space and weight saving is realized. In addition, significant instrumentation, controls and shutdown functions are removed with the separator system resulting in reduced control, operational and maintenance complexity of the system. It also results in higher system availability.
The concept of installing a scrubber provides a convenient and efficient way of increasing the gas handling capacity of the separator either for a “brownfield” modification or refurbishment of used equipment. Many operating facilities presently experience significant problems due to liquid carry-over from the bulk gas liquid separators to the gas compression trains resulting in mechanical damage to compressor impellers, etc. The proposed configuration of the separator system may provide a cost effective option of installing a gas scrubber on top of an existing separator to polish the gas stream exiting the separator without the need of significant space and adding weight to the existing facilities. In addition it may also avoid the need for additional controls and shutdowns.
The Slug Handling section 320 comprises a separation pipe inclined to the horizontal, such as a horizontal expanded pipe 340 or other such separator/system, capable of gas and liquid separation of fluid (such as FWS fluid), that has a Gas Bypass Line 342 at its upper section and is in operational connection with a pipe known as a Stilling Well 350 at its lower section. The Slug Handling device 340 may be a conventional separator or a pipe piece with or without internals that is positioned horizontally with a slight tilt to enable the liquid to flow effortlessly into the Stilling Well 350. Only coarse gas/liquid separation may be performed in the slug handling device 340 as final separation is undertaken at the gas polishing scrubber section 330 and the bulk gas/liquid separation section 325. As such, the slug handling device may be sized as a minimum to ensure flow in this section is in the stratified flow regime and to accommodate the anticipated slug volume arriving.
In operation, fluid such as FWS fluid is first routed to the slug handling device 340 for gas and liquid separation after which the liquids, including liquid slugs, are diverted into the Stilling Well 350 and the gas is routed to the Gas Bypass Line 342. The Gas Bypass Line 342 routes the gas stream to the Gas Scrubber 405 ensuring that the pressure in the Slug Handling device 320 is almost equal to that at the Gas Scrubber 405 and Separator 380. This configuration ensures that the discharge of the liquid from the Stilling Well 350 to the Separator 380 via the heat exchanger 365 and/or restriction orifice (not shown in diagram) is only dependent on the differential static head 386 of the liquid level in the Stilling Well 350 and at the Separator 380. The height of the Stilling Well 350 is predetermined to provide sufficient liquid head 386, between the normal liquid level 346 and the liquid level 375 in the separation chamber 380, to overcome pressure drop of the liquid travelling from the stilling well 350 to the separation chamber 380. Under normal steady state design flow conditions, the system hydraulics is configured to maintain liquid level 346 near to base of the slug handling device 340 and within the stilling well 350.
The horizontal position of the slug handling device 340, its geometry (long and thin) and its overall volume ensures that the arrival of liquid slugs does not increase liquid head 345 significantly while the slugs are accommodated in the slug handling device, thus minimizing the incremental liquid head 345. As the liquid flow is dependent on the available liquid head, the position and geometry ensure a steady flow through the heater 365 into the separator even with the arrival of large liquid slugs. Consequently, this ensures good temperature control and performance of the heater and minimizes turbulence in the downstream separator, enabling good 3 phase separation. In addition the system also ensures that pressure surges following slug arrival does not cause surges in liquid flow from the stilling well to the separator chamber as pressure in the slug handling system 320 and the gas scrubber 330 are equalized.
This separator configuration 315 thus effectively manages slugs and associated pressure surges using a pressure balanced system with effective use of liquid hydraulic head, as detailed above, to ensure stable flow even under slugging conditions. This is achieved without additional instrumentation and controls thus providing for a highly reliable system with overall liquid level controls maintained at the bulk 3 phase separator 325.
Since sand is occasionally present in the incoming fluid, a sand trap 355 is installed at the bottom of the Stilling Well 350 where additional valves 360 will be added to periodically remove the sand. Separation of sand in liquid medium can occur via two main mechanisms:
As shown in
Phases with different densities will have different momentum. If a two phase stream changes direction sharply, greater momentum will not allow the particles of the heavier phase to turn as rapidly as the lighter fluid, so separation occurs.
The diameter of the stilling well is sized to aid both gravity settling of sand and to provide adequate surge volume for liquid hold-up to ensure that instantaneous flow fluctuations are dampened.
The configuration of the Slug Handling Device 340 may simplify the controls associated with conventional slug catchers as it eliminates the need for liquid level and pressure control valve and shutdown valves, thus improves the reliability of the system. This also reduces the size of the slug handling device 340 compared to a conventional slug catcher as the slug handling device 340 needs to only cater for the maximum anticipated slug volume with liquid hold-up for final degassing being accommodated in the downstream 3 phase separator 325.
An inlet Heater 365 may be required upstream of the 3-phase separator 325 to provide heat to break the emulsion, thus enabling improved separation of oil and water. In a system according to the present invention, the flow rate may be limited by the available static head to overcome the pressure drop across the Inlet Heater and associated piping and fittings. This arrangement has the benefit of heating only the liquid stream and avoids heating of the gas stream which is bypassed via the Gas Bypass Line 342 of the Slug Handling Device 340. The system effectively utilizes the static head 386 available in the Stilling Well 350 to control flow through the Inlet Heater 365 and thus eliminates permanent pressure drop. This will result in reduced downstream compression power requirements. In addition, the configuration allows for a steady flow to the heater even under fluctuating incoming flow and pressure conditions typically associated to heavily slugging incoming fluid flow conditions.
The liquid is then conveyed to the Separator 380 in which the horizontal vessel is piggy backed with a vertical scrubber 405 according to a further embodiment of the present invention. The bulk gas/liquid separation will be in the horizontal part 380 of the system while gas scrubbing/polishing is performed in the vertical part 405 of the system. Gas, with entrained liquid, will exit the horizontal separator section via an outlet deflector plate. A specialty gas outlet device such as a mist mat, vane pack, etc is not provided at the gas outlet section of the horizontal separator section as for the reasons stated previously.
An expanded pipe, sized to minimize pressure drop routes gas (with entrained liquid) to the vertical gas scrubber section. The Gas Bypass Line 342 from the Slug Handling System 320 will connect with the expanded pipe from the separator before being passed through the gas scrubber.
The vertical gas scrubber section 330 is sized for the process conditions and gas flow and liquid carry-over from the horizontal separator section and the slug handling device. The scrubber 405 may be provided with typical internals designed to enhance gas liquid separation. An inlet distributor 415 is provided at the scrubber to reduce the inlet velocity and to give a good gas distribution in the vessel. A gas outlet demisting device 410 is also provided and may be a mist mat, vane pack, cyclonic or other proprietary internals depending on the specific application requirements.
Liquid separated at the vertical gas scrubbing section 405 is routed via a downcomer pipe 385 to the liquid pad of the horizon separator. The termination of the downcomer pipe 385 is to be below the low liquid level 390 in the horizontal separator 380 to ensure that gas does not bypass the separator via the downcomer pipe 385 under operating conditions. To avoid accumulation of oil phase in the downcomer pipe, the pipe is terminated above the high oil water interface level of the horizontal separator, 325. The pressure drop of the gas from the horizontal separator section 380 to the vertical scrubber section 405, including the scrubber inlet device 415 is to be less than the static liquid head in the downcomer pipe 385 from high liquid level in the horizontal separator 380 to the bottom of the vertical scrubber 405. This will ensure that liquid from the liquid pad of the separator section does not rise up the downcomer pipe 385 to the scrubber 380, due to siphon effect.
A differential pressure transmitter may be provided to monitor the performance of the system. In the case when the production liquid cause fouling and/or is waxy, a nozzle may be provided at the inlet pipe to the vertical scrubber 405 to enable hot water flushing of the inlet device (due to wax blockages and/or fouling) as required. Potential blockage or flow restriction at the inlet device is monitored by the differential pressure transmitter. In addition, hot water or solvent flushing facility may also be provided at the gas outlet device liquid draining compartment to remove blockages/restrictions as required.
The benefits of system according to the present invention may include over the conventional system may include:
The liquid level of the fluid in the stilling well 350 is dependent on the pressure drop of the liquid through the heat exchanger. Hence, the heat exchanger is sized for minimal pressure drop to minimize the height of the slug handling device, 340 relative to the bulk separator, 325. Note that the line between the stilling well 350 and the bulk separator, 325 may include any other flow restricting device, like a restriction orifice, if a heat exchanger is not required for the service.
The liquid level in the stilling well increases, as a result the liquid flow to the Heater and Separator will increase. To provide additional protection against high liquid level in the Separator, a further embodiment as shown in
In some cases, a restriction orifice may be used instead of the valve to restrict the large surge from entering the separator to ensure that overall pressure drop under normal maximum flow conditions maintains liquid level in the stilling well near the top of the stilling well. This ensures that when slug arrives, the slug volume is accommodated within the slug handling device, thus minimizing static head rise 345 on slug arrival. This ensures steady flow of liquid to the bulk separator via the heater even under slugging conditions.
Another variation is to provide a control valve 427 with minimum pressure drop when in open position at the Gas Bypass Line 342. This embodiment is illustrated in
There are two methods considered in this system for sand separation; gravity settling & change in momentum of the sand and cyclonic sand removal device.
With the introduction of a liquid jetting stream 451, the cyclonic device 442 generates a vortex which fluidizes solids within their surrounding area so as to form a suspension of sand/solids. When fluidized, or suspended, the solids are drawn to the cyclonic device discharge pipe allowing for controlled hydro-transportation out of the stilling well. The solids are transported to the de-sander vessel 444 where the solids are separated from the discharge sand slurry stream. The de-sanding operation may be semi-automated with operators activating an automatic sequence or continuously operated depending on the sand content of the production fluid. The sand may be removed through valve controlled outlet 445 while the separator remains online with no interruption to production. To assist in the removal of sand from the slurry in the de-sander vessel 444, a further cyclonic sand removal device 440 may be employed to separate the sand from the sand/liquid slurry.
In a further embodiment, a system 460 may include a bulk water separator 465.
Zainal Abidin, Shahrul Azman B, Jothy, Arul
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11173427, | Sep 25 2017 | SANDTINEL TECHNOLOGY INC ; SAND SEPARATION TECHNOLOGIES INC | Device for separating solids from a fluid stream |
11839884, | Sep 06 2018 | SANDTINEL TECHNOLOGY INC ; SAND SEPARATION TECHNOLOGIES INC | Counterflow vortex breaker |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2899014, | |||
3255573, | |||
3413778, | |||
4583998, | Nov 19 1982 | Laurance S., Reid | Separator system and process for gas conditioning solutions |
8864881, | Sep 01 2009 | NGLTECH SDN BHD | Slug suppressor apparatus and crude oil stabilization assembly and process therefor |
20090113881, | |||
20090282985, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 30 2012 | Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 30 2012 | NGLTECH SDN.BHD. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 28 2012 | B ZAINAL ABIDIN, SHAHRUL AZMAN | NGLTECH SDN BHD | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT AN ERROR IN A COVER SHEET PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 030908 FRAME 0580 TO ASSIGNEE PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD PETRONAS S ADDRESS | 031059 | /0682 | |
May 28 2012 | JOTHY, ARUL | PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD PETRONAS | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT AN ERROR IN A COVER SHEET PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 030908 FRAME 0580 TO ASSIGNEE PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD PETRONAS S ADDRESS | 031059 | /0682 | |
May 28 2012 | B ZAINAL ABIDIN, SHAHRUL AZMAN | PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD PETRONAS | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT AN ERROR IN A COVER SHEET PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 030908 FRAME 0580 TO ASSIGNEE PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD PETRONAS S ADDRESS | 031059 | /0682 | |
May 28 2012 | JOTHY, ARUL | NGLTECH SDN BHD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 030908 | /0580 | |
May 28 2012 | ZAINAL ABIDIN, SHAHRUL AZMAN B | NGLTECH SDN BHD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 030908 | /0580 | |
May 28 2012 | JOTHY, ARUL | PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD PETRONAS | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 030908 | /0580 | |
May 28 2012 | ZAINAL ABIDIN, SHAHRUL AZMAN B | PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD PETRONAS | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 030908 | /0580 | |
May 28 2012 | JOTHY, ARUL | NGLTECH SDN BHD | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT AN ERROR IN A COVER SHEET PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 030908 FRAME 0580 TO ASSIGNEE PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD PETRONAS S ADDRESS | 031059 | /0682 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 09 2020 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 27 2023 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 12 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 12 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 12 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 12 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 12 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 12 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 12 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 12 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 12 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 12 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 12 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 12 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |