A moineau style stator includes a stator tube having a plurality of rigid helical lobes formed on an inner surface thereof. The helical lobes define a major internal tube diameter that is greater than a pass through diameter of the tube such that the major diameter undercuts the pass through diameter of the tube. A major liner diameter may also be less than the pass through diameter so as to provide a suitable interference fit between rotor and stator.
|
1. A moineau style stator comprising:
an integral stator tube including a longitudinal end having a threaded box end defining an internal pass through diameter;
the stator tube defining an internal helical cavity and further including a plurality of internal rigid helical lobes formed on an inner surface of the tube, the helical cavity having a major internal tube diameter that is greater than the pass through diameter of the longitudinal end; and
a resilient liner deployed on an inner surface of the stator tube and presented to the helical cavity,
wherein the resilient liner defines a major internal liner diameter that is less than the pass through diameter of the longitudinal end.
4. A subterranean drilling motor comprising:
a rotor having a plurality of rotor lobes on a helical outer surface of the rotor;
a stator including an integral stator tube, the stator tube including a longitudinal end having a threaded box end defining an internal pass through diameter, the stator tube defining an internal helical cavity and further including a plurality of rigid helical lobes formed on an inner surface of the tube, the helical cavity having a major internal tube diameter that is greater than the pass through diameter of the longitudinal end, the stator further including a resilient liner deployed on an inner surface of the stator tube and presented to the internal helical cavity, the resilient liner defining a major internal liner diameter that is less than the pass through diameter of the longitudinal end; and
the rotor deployable in the helical cavity of the stator tube such that an outer surface of the rotor is in a rotational interference fit with the resilient liner.
2. The stator of
5. The stator tube of
|
None.
The present invention relates generally to Moineau style drilling motors and pumps, typically for downhole use. This invention more specifically relates to Moineau style stators having a rigid internal helical profile.
Moineau style hydraulic motors and pumps are conventional in subterranean drilling and artificial lift applications, such as for oil and/or gas exploration. Such motors make use of hydraulic power from drilling fluid to provide torque and rotary power, for example, to a drill bit assembly. The power section of a typical Moineau style motor includes a helical rotor disposed within the helical cavity of a corresponding stator. When viewed in transverse cross section, a typical stator shows a plurality of lobes in the helical cavity. In most conventional Moineau style power sections, the rotor lobes and the stator lobes are preferably disposed in an interference fit, with the rotor including one fewer lobe than the stator. Thus, when fluid, such as a conventional drilling fluid, is passed through the helical spaces between rotor and stator, the flow of fluid causes the rotor to rotate relative to the stator (which may be coupled, for example, to a drill string). The rotor may be coupled, for example, through a universal connection and an output shaft to a drill bit assembly.
Conventional stators commonly include a helical cavity component bonded to an inner surface of a steel tube. The helical cavity component in such conventional stators typically includes an elastomer (e.g., rubber) and provides a resilient surface with which to facilitate the interference fit with the rotor. Many stators are known in the art in which the helical cavity component is made substantially entirely of a single elastomer layer.
It has been observed that during drilling operations, the elastomer portions of conventional stator lobes are subject to considerable cyclic deflection, due at least in part to the interference fit with the rotor and reactive torque from the rotor. Such cyclic deflection is well known to cause a significant temperature rise in the elastomer. In conventional stators, especially those in which the helical cavity component is made substantially entirely from a single elastomer layer, the greatest temperature rise often occurs at or near the center of the helical lobes. The temperature rise is known to degrade and embrittle the elastomer, eventually causing cracks, cavities, and other types of failure in the lobes. Such elastomer degradation is known to reduce the expected operational life of the stator and necessitate premature replacement thereof. Left unchecked, degradation of the elastomer will eventually undermine the seal between the rotor and stator (essentially destroying the integrity of the interference fit), which results in fluid leakage therebetween. The fluid leakage in turn causes a loss of drive torque and eventually may cause failure of the motor (e.g., stalling of the rotor in the stator) if left unchecked.
Stators including a rigid internal helical profile have been developed to address this problem. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,171,138 to Forrest and U.S. Pat. No. 6,309,195 to Bottos et al. disclose stators having helical cavity components in which a thin elastomer liner is deployed on the inner surface of a rigid, metallic stator former. The '138 patent discloses a rigid, metallic stator former deployed in a stator tube. The '195 patent discloses a “thick walled” stator having inner and outer helical stator profiles. The use of such “rigid” stators is disclosed to preserve the shape of the stator lobes during normal operations (i.e., to prevent lobe deformation) and therefore to improve stator efficiency and torque and power transmission. Moreover, such metallic stators are also disclosed to provide greater heat dissipation than conventional stators including elastomer lobes. While stators having rigid stator formers have been used commercially, there is room for further improvement.
The present disclosure addresses one or more of the above-described drawbacks of conventional Moineau style motors and pumps. Aspects of the present disclosure include a Moineau style stator for use in such motors and/or pumps, such as in a downhole drilling motor. The stator includes a stator tube (e.g., a steel tube) having a plurality of rigid helical lobes formed on an inner surface thereof. These helical lobes define a major internal tube diameter that is greater than a pass through diameter of the tube. As a result, the helical cavity in the stator tube undercuts the pass through diameter of the tube. In preferred embodiments, a major liner diameter is less than the pass through diameter so as to provide a suitable interference fit between rotor and stator. The present disclosure also includes methods for fabricating stators in accordance with the present disclosure.
Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure advantageously provide several technical advantages. In particular, embodiments of the present disclosure provide for increased power and torque per unit stator length as compared to prior art stators in which the major internal tube diameter is less than the pass through diameter. The present disclosure also enables the use of increased liner thickness without loss of power or torque.
In one aspect, the present disclosure includes a Moineau style stator. The stator includes an integral stator tube having a longitudinal end with an internal pass through diameter. The stator tube defines an internal helical cavity and further includes a plurality of internal rigid helical lobes formed on an inner surface of the tube. The helical cavity has a major internal tube diameter that is greater than the pass through diameter of the longitudinal end.
In another aspect, the present disclosure includes a method for fabricating a Moineau style stator. A stator tube having at least one longitudinal end having a first pass through diameter is provided. A helical profile is formed on an inner surface of the tube, the helical profile including a plurality of rigid internal helical lobes and a major internal tube diameter that is less than the first pass through diameter. At least one longitudinal end of the stator tube is mechanically worked so as to reduce outer and inner diameters of the end such that the end has a second pass through diameter, the second pass through diameter being less than the major internal tube diameter formed on the inner surface of the tube.
In still another aspect, the present disclosure includes a method for fabricating a Moineau style stator. A stator tube is provided having at least one longitudinal end with a pass through diameter. The stator tube further includes an internal relief groove in which an inner diameter of the relief groove is greater than the pass through diameter. An electrochemical machining electrode is assembled in the relief groove. The electrode includes a plurality of distinct work pieces, each of the work pieces having an outer diameter less than the pass through diameter. The assembled electrode defines a major helical diameter greater than the pass through diameter. An internal helical profile is electrochemically machined in the stator tube using the assembled electrodes, the internal helical profile including a plurality of helical lobes and a major internal tube diameter that is greater than the pass through diameter of the longitudinal end. The electrodes are then disassembled and removed from the from the stator tube.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present disclosure in order that the detailed description of the present disclosure that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the present disclosure will be described hereinafter, which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present disclosure. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference now to
With continued reference to
The helical lobes 115 formed on the inner surface of the stator tube 110 define major and minor internal tube diameters. The major tube diameter 140 is the outermost (the largest) internal tube diameter and extends from trough to trough on the tube 110 as depicted on
With continued reference to
One aspect of the present disclosure is the realization that conventional fabrication techniques utilized to fabricate rigid stators (stators having a rigid internal helical profile) limit these stators to having a major internal tube diameter that is less than (or possibly equal to) the pass through diameter. Various techniques, such as pilgering, rolling, forging, and hydroforming utilize a mandrel having an outer helical profile. The mandrel is inserted into a tube which is then formed over (about) the mandrel to create a helical profile on the inner surface of the tube. In techniques such as extrusion or drawing, the tube is drawn about a die that forms the inner profile. In electrochemical machining techniques, an electrode (also referred to in the art as a cathode) is first manufactured that has an external profile similar to the aforementioned die (or to the predetermined helical profile of the stator tube). This electrode is inserted into the tube and used to electrochemically machine an internal helical profile. In each of these manufacturing techniques, the mandrel, die, or electrode must be withdrawn from the tube after formation of the internal helical profile. In order to insert and/or remove the mandrel, die, or electrode from the tube, the pass through diameter in such prior art stators must be at least slightly greater than the major diameter of the mandrel, die, or electrode. This results in a stator tube having a major internal tube diameter that is less than the pass through diameter of the tube.
With reference now to
At 206, the longitudinal end of the tube is reduced via mechanical working (e.g., via a hot or cold forging or swaging technique). This mechanical working reduces the pass through diameter of the tube end to a diameter that is less than the major internal tube diameter that was formed at 204. The mechanical working process may optionally further include one or more machining steps, for example, to provide a precisely dimensioned pass through diameter and/or to form internal threads. At 208 a resilient (e.g., elastomer) liner may be formed on the internal helical surface, e.g., using conventional injection molding techniques.
Turning now to
Although the present disclosure and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alternations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Underwood, Lance D., Murray, William D., Washburn, Thomas K.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10001123, | May 29 2015 | Fluid pressure changing device | |
10408214, | May 29 2015 | Fluid pressure changing device | |
10676992, | Mar 22 2017 | CROSSBERRY HOLDINGS LIMITED | Downhole tools with progressive cavity sections, and related methods of use and assembly |
11035364, | May 29 2015 | Pressure changing device |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2464011, | |||
2527673, | |||
3084631, | |||
3139035, | |||
3417664, | |||
3499389, | |||
3822972, | |||
3840080, | |||
3857654, | |||
3912426, | |||
3975120, | Nov 14 1973 | Halliburton Company | Wafer elements for progressing cavity stators |
3975121, | Nov 14 1973 | Halliburton Company | Wafer elements for progressing cavity stators |
4104009, | Mar 09 1976 | Societe Generale de Mecanique et de Metallurgie | Screw pump stators |
4144001, | Mar 29 1977 | Fordertechnik Streicher GmbH; Max, Streicher | Eccentric worm pump with annular wearing elements |
4265323, | Sep 13 1979 | Eastman Christensen Company | Direct bit drive for deep drilling tools |
4415316, | May 21 1980 | Eastman Christensen Company | Down hole motor |
4558991, | Jan 10 1985 | Wave pump assembly | |
4614232, | Mar 19 1984 | Eastman Christensen Company | Device for delivering flowable material |
4636151, | Mar 13 1985 | Hughes Tool Company | Downhole progressive cavity type drilling motor with flexible connecting rod |
4676725, | Dec 27 1985 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Moineau type gear mechanism with resilient sleeve |
4718824, | Sep 12 1983 | INSTITUT FRANCAIS DU PETROLE & SOCIETE NATIONALE ELF AQUITAINE PRODUCTION | Usable device, in particular for the pumping of an extremely viscous fluid and/or containing a sizeable proportion of gas, particularly for petrol production |
4991292, | Jul 30 1988 | Gummi-Jager KG GmbH & Cie | Method of producing elastomeric stators for eccentric helical pumps |
5064889, | Nov 01 1988 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | Curable fluorosilicone composition |
5090497, | Jul 30 1990 | BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED A CORPORATION OF DELAWARE | Flexible coupling for progressive cavity downhole drilling motor |
5139400, | Oct 11 1989 | Progressive cavity drive train | |
5145342, | Mar 01 1990 | GD-Anker GmbH | Stator for eccentric spiral pump |
5171138, | Dec 20 1990 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Composite stator construction for downhole drilling motors |
5171139, | Nov 26 1991 | Halliburton Company | Moineau motor with conduits through the stator |
5257967, | Jan 24 1991 | DIAMOND ROLLER CORPORATION | Inking rollers |
5439359, | Oct 23 1991 | Rotary positive displacement machine with helicoid surfaces of particular shapes | |
5474432, | Feb 22 1993 | Mono Pumps Limited | Progressive cavity pump or motors |
5700888, | Nov 10 1996 | Bridgestone Corporation | Synthesis of macrocyclic polymers having low hysteresis compounded properties |
5759019, | Sep 14 1994 | BICO Drilling Tools, Inc | Progressive cavity pumps using composite materials |
5832604, | Sep 08 1995 | Roper Pump Company | Method of manufacturing segmented stators for helical gear pumps and motors |
6019583, | Feb 14 1994 | BICO Drilling Tools, Inc | Reverse moineau motor |
6102681, | Oct 15 1997 | APS Technology | Stator especially adapted for use in a helicoidal pump/motor |
6183226, | Apr 24 1986 | BICO Drilling Tools, Inc | Progressive cavity motors using composite materials |
6190771, | Dec 28 1998 | Eastman Kodak Company | Fuser assembly with donor roller having reduced release agent swell |
6224526, | Dec 19 1997 | H.B. Fuller Licensing & Financing, Inc.; H B FULLER LICENSING & FINANCING | Printing rollers |
6241494, | Sep 18 1998 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Non-elastomeric stator and downhole drilling motors incorporating same |
6293358, | Jun 18 1998 | Artemis Kautschuk und Kunstofftechnik GmbH & Cie | Machine operating according to the Moineau-Principle for the use in deep drilling |
6309195, | Jun 05 1998 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Internally profiled stator tube |
6336796, | Jun 07 1999 | Institut Francais du Petrole | Progressive-cavity pump with composite stator and manufacturing process |
6413417, | Jan 28 1999 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Waste water treatment apparatus |
6427787, | Jun 24 1999 | Artemis Kautschuk-und Kunststoffechnik GmbH & Cie | Drilling motor that operates pursuant to the Moineau principle for drilling deep holes |
6543132, | Dec 18 1997 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Methods of making mud motors |
6568076, | Jun 05 1998 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method of making an internally profiled stator tube |
6604921, | Jan 24 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Optimized liner thickness for positive displacement drilling motors |
6604922, | Mar 14 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Optimized fiber reinforced liner material for positive displacement drilling motors |
6881045, | Jun 19 2003 | Robbins & Myers Energy Systems, L.P.; ROBBINS & MYERS ENERGY SYSTEMS, L P | Progressive cavity pump/motor |
6935995, | Jun 16 2001 | Westland Gummiwerke GmbH & Co. | Roller for fluid film preparation or application |
6944935, | Mar 14 2002 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of forming an optimized fiber reinforced liner on a rotor with a motor |
7083010, | Dec 04 1997 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Apparatus and method for drilling and reaming a borehole |
7083401, | Oct 27 2003 | Smith International, Inc | Asymmetric contouring of elastomer liner on lobes in a Moineau style power section stator |
7192260, | Oct 09 2003 | LEHR PRECISION, INC | Progressive cavity pump/motor stator, and apparatus and method to manufacture same by electrochemical machining |
7396220, | Feb 11 2005 | Smith International, Inc | Progressing cavity stator including at least one cast longitudinal section |
20050079083, | |||
20050089429, | |||
20050118040, | |||
20050263289, | |||
20060029507, | |||
20060182643, | |||
20080310981, | |||
20090169404, | |||
20100038142, | |||
DE1528978, | |||
DE19531318, | |||
DE2713468, | |||
DE3503604, | |||
DE4006339, | |||
EP358789, | |||
GB2081812, | |||
WO144615, | |||
WO2009052112, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 11 2010 | MURRAY, WILLIAM D | Smith International, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024159 | /0655 | |
Feb 25 2010 | UNDERWOOD, LANCE D | Smith International, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024159 | /0655 | |
Mar 05 2010 | WASHBURN, THOMAS K | Smith International, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024159 | /0655 | |
Mar 30 2010 | Smith International Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 03 2020 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 03 2024 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 19 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 19 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 19 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 19 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 19 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 19 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 19 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 19 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 19 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 19 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 19 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 19 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |