A transmitter transmits an outbound message signal via the power distribution system. The transmitter includes a spreader for spreading the spectrum of the communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal. A receiver despreads the spectrum of the received digitized signal and digitally demodulates the received despread signal to generate the message. The transmitted signal is orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system.
|
7. In a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal, a method for detecting the outbound messages comprising:
receiving an analog outbound signal including an outbound message;
converting the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal, said method characterized by:
parsing synchronized with the mains signal the digitized signal into repeated full-cycle snapshots, wherein each full-cycle snapshot is repeated N times, where N is greater than one;
despreading the spectrum of the full-cycle snapshots using N spreading coefficients to provide a despread signal wherein the despreading comprises applying a spreading code to the full cycle snapshots of the parsed signal including despreading each full cycle snapshot by one of a series of spreading coefficients, each spreading coefficient defined as an where n=0, 1, . . . , N−1; and
digitally demodulating the despread signal to provide the outbound message.
3. In a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal, a method of generating the outbound messages comprising:
providing a communications signal including a message modulated on a carrier signal; and
transmitting an outbound message signal corresponding to the communications signal via the power distribution system, wherein said transmitting comprises:
locking the phase of the outbound message signal to the mains signal,
responsive to the phase of the mains signal, segmenting the communications signal into sections, each section corresponding to one mains cycle;
repeating each segmented section N times in the outbound message signal, where N is greater than one; and
spreading the spectrum of the segmented communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal such that the outbound message signal is orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system wherein the spreading comprises applying a spreading code to the segmented communications signal and wherein the applying comprises multiplying each mains cycle section of the segmented communications signal by one of a series of spreading coefficients, each spreading coefficient defined as an where n=0, 1, . . . , N−1.
1. In a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal, an apparatus comprising:
a signal modulator providing a communications signal s(t) including a message modulated on a carrier signal; and
a transmitter receiving the communications signal and transmitting a corresponding outbound message signal via the power distribution system, wherein said transmitter includes:
a phase-locked loop (pll) linked to the outbound message signal for locking the phase of the respective outbound message signals to the mains signal;
a repeater linked to and responsive to the pll for segmenting the communications signal into sections, each section corresponding to one mains cycle and repeating each section in the outbound message signal N times where N is greater than one; and
a spreader for spreading the spectrum of the segmented communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal such that the outbound message signal transmitted by the transmitter is substantially orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system wherein the spreader applies a spreading code to the segmented communications signal including multiplying each mains cycle section of the segmented communications signal by one of a series of spreading coefficients, each spreading coefficient defined as an where n=0, 1, . . . , N−1.
4. In a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal, a receiver for detecting the outbound messages, said receiver comprising:
an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter receiving the outbound signal including an outbound message and converting the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal; and
a digital processor connected to the A/D converter and adapted to receive the digitized signal, wherein the digital processor comprises:
a phase-locked loop (pll) connected to the source of the mains signal and locked to the mains signal; and
a parser connected to the pll and synchronized to the pll for parsing the received signal into repeated full-cycle snapshots, wherein each full-cycle snapshot is repeated N times, where N is greater than one;
said digital processor connected to the parser, said digital processor configured to receive the full-cycle snapshots and configured to despread the spectrum of the full-cycle snapshots using N spreading coefficients to provide a despread signal and configured to digitally demodulate the despread signal to provide the outbound message;
wherein the despreader applies a spreading code to the full cycle snapshots of the parsed signal including despreading each full cycle snapshot by one of a series of spreading coefficients, each spreading coefficient defined as an where n=0, 1, . . . , N−1.
2. The apparatus of
an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter receiving the outbound signal including an outbound message and converting the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal; and
a digital processor despreading the spectrum of the received digitized signal and digitally demodulating the received despread signal to provide the outbound message.
5. The receiver of
6. The receiver of
a signal modulator providing a communications signal s(t) including a message modulated on a carrier signal; and
a transmitter receiving the communications signal and transmitting a corresponding outbound message signal via the power distribution system, wherein said transmitter includes:
a phase-locked loop (pll) linked to the outbound message signal for locking the phase of the respective outbound message signals to the mains signal;
a repeater linked to and responsive to the pll for segmenting the communications signal into sections, each section corresponding to one mains cycle; and,
a spreader for spreading the spectrum of the segmented communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal such that the outbound message signal transmitted by the transmitter is substantially orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system.
|
This application is a U.S. national stage application of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/062510, filed Nov. 30, 2011, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/419,091, filed Dec. 2, 2010 and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/442,956, filed Feb. 15, 2011, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Automated meter reading (AMR) and advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) are technologies used for the wireless monitoring and control of remote systems. Used by various utilities, these technologies allow users to centrally monitor and control the flow of resources to reduce environmental risks and efficiently manage operations.
Very low frequency (VLF) power line communications (PLC) presently has widespread use in AMR/AMI deployments and may also be useful for smart grid applications, largely due to its excellent propagative properties. However, noise within the VLF band is more energetic than at higher frequencies and without effective noise mitigation degrades channel capacity, possibly to the point of making the band impractical.
Paired transmission lines and other devices on the grid are not conducive to high frequency carrier signals. Signals within the VLF band (and those below it) have the advantage of propagating over very long distances. The TWACS communication system, resides within the extremely low frequency band (ELF) and has very little, if any, signal attenuation over distances up to 100 miles, for example. While successful low frequency band (LF) links have been demonstrated over distances of 2 to 6 km as have broadband links over distances of 1 km, in many deployments a complete substation-to-meter link cannot be established in these bands without introducing signal boosters or repeaters.
One disadvantage to using the VLF band is reduced data rate due to decreased available bandwidth. Another objection to VLF PLC is that the noise increases with decreasing frequency. Thus, while desirable propagative properties of the medium may yield high signal energies, the effect may be offset by a disproportionate increase in noise power.
In one embodiment, the invention comprises a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal.
In one aspect, a signal modulator provides a communications signal including a message modulated on a carrier signal. A transmitter receives the communications signal and transmits a corresponding outbound message signal via the power distribution system. The transmitter includes a phase-locked loop linked to the outbound message signal for locking the phase of the respective outbound message signals to the mains signal. The transmitter also includes a spreader for spreading the spectrum of the communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal. The outbound message signal is orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system.
In another aspect, a receiver includes an analog-to-digital converter receiving the outbound signal including an outbound message and converting the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal. A digital processor despreads the spectrum of the received digitized signal and digitally demodulates the received despread signal to provide the outbound message.
In another aspect, the combination of the transmitter and the receiver comprise a system according to one embodiment of the invention. It is also contemplated that the transmitter may be used with other receivers to comprise a system according to one embodiment of the invention. It is also contemplated that other transmitters in combination with the receiver may comprise a system according to one embodiment of the invention.
In another aspect, methods of the operation of the transmitter, receiver and system comprise embodiments of the invention.
Other objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
The system and method can be used to send any message over a power line. Many power line communications systems go from meter to meter, rather than substation to meter, for example. Although the noise may be modeled as a cyclostationary random process, the cyclostationary model for actual power line noise is unnecessarily restrictive so that the invention is based on modeling the VLF PLC channel as having a non-trivial wide-sense periodic component.
The system and method of the invention compensates for PLC noise in the low frequency band (LF) and below. In particular, the system and method of the invention addresses the preponderance of periodic noise in these bands. This has important ramifications for receiver configurations and, when employed, the invention increases the post-processed SNR, making VLF PLC a more attractive prospect for smart grid communications. Receivers and transmitted waveforms of the invention penetrate the periodic noise leaving only the weaker, cyclostationary noise with which to contend.
The system and method of the invention and, in particular, the algorithms used by the system and method of the invention estimate the noise directly according to the harmonics in
According to an embodiment of the system and method of the invention, PLC signals are generated so that they are orthogonal to the PLI in a modified version of direct sequence spread spectrum (DS-SS). Signals may be generated using any modulation method, be it OFDM, BPSK (binary phase-shift keying), TWACS (two way automatic communications system) or others. However, before transmission the signal is operated on by a spreading code. This operation is phase-locked to the mains signal to ensure near orthogonality to the PLI. At the receiver the signal is despread, and it is in this despreading operation that PLI is essentially canceled, or at least sharply mitigated.
Advantages of this approach to PLC are that it may be applied to a wide range of PLC technologies, and it minimizes the need for sophisticated and computationally complex PLI estimation algorithms.
It is interesting to note that TWACS and the resonating transmitter are both mains synchronous systems of this sort, although they may not have previously been considered so.
Transmitter
The transmitted output signal is coupled to the PLL 204 which, as noted above, synchronizes to the mains signal on the power distribution system PDS. This coupling occurs only insofar as both the coupler and the mains are connected to the mains. In some configurations, the presence of the transmitted signal could potentially degrade the PLL performance. In such configurations, some mitigative signal processing may be necessary in the PLL 204.
Thus,
As illustrated in
In one embodiment, the invention is a method of generating the outbound messages comprising:
The relationship of the transmitted output signal to the mains is demonstrated in
Orthogonal Relationship of Transmitted Output Signal to PLI (Power Line Interference)
For a signal s(t) repeated N times with period T and spreading coefficients an, the transmitted signal is:
where δ(t) is the delta-Dirac function. The Fourier transform of the transmittal signal is thus:
Z(f)=S(f)H(f) (III.2)
where S(f) is the Fourier transform of s(t) and H(f) is:
Ad(λ) is the discrete Fourier transform of the sequence [a0 a1 . . . aN-1]. The signal spectrum:
Z(f)=S(f)Ad(2πfT) (III.4)
can therefore be made to be zero at mains harmonics by selecting an so that Ad(2πfT)=0 at f=n/T for all integer n. That is, Ad(2πn)=0. The only requirement for this is that:
Equation (III.4) under the condition specified by equation (III.5), that the sum of the coefficients equal zero, is demonstrated graphically in
Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) signals will necessarily have a sub-channel spacing of 1/T or more, where T is the symbol time. In practice it will be 1/T plus the guard interval. Sub-channel spacing will thus be very close to 1/T. The signal energy in any one channel is at least the energy in one 1/T sub-channel. To show that there is no energy loss in any one sub-channel consider the frequency interval [f, f+1/T]. By application of Parseval's theorem:
Thus, the signal in any one sub-channel is the total power transmitted in that band. In fact, repeating the signal N times, although with a spreading code, increases the signal energy by a factor of N, provided an are roots of unity.
Consider an OFDM system operating between 1 KHZ and 9 KHz and a spreading code of length N=4 where:
a0=1, a1=−1, a2=1, and a3=−1.
Table 1 summarizes the OFDM system parameters.
TABLE 1
Example OFDM
system parameters
N
4
bandwidth
8
KHz
Tg
0.1
ms
sub-carriers
132
sub-carrier
60.36
Hz
spacing
Rb (spectral
1.98
kbps
efficiency = 1)
The guard interval, Tg, is set to compensate for channel length. Let us assume 100×10−6 seconds, for no particular reason. For a 60 Hz mains, the symbol rate, Ts, must be such that:
Ts+Tg= 1/60
Ts=16.57 ms.
This corresponds to a sub-carrier spacing of 60.36 Hz. The number of subcarriers between 1 and 9 KHz is therefore 132. Assuming a spectral efficiency of 1, the data rate is:
Rb=132 bits/symbol×15 symbols/sec=1.98 kbps.
There are only 15 unique symbols per second because of the length-4 spreading. By equation (III.6) there is a 6 dB gain in transmitted energy. The data rate depends on modulation used (e.g. QPSK (quadrature phase-shift keying), BPSK, differential BPSK) and code rate. This, in turn, depends on the SNR, which will be larger because of the coding gain.
Receiver
Embodiments of systems and methods of the invention may be used with any modulation method that produces signals s(t) with duration no longer than a mains cycle. The spreading method and system described above may be inserted after the signal is generated and before it is transmitted. Likewise, at the receiver, the despreading method is performed prior to demodulation.
The received signal, parsed with the aid of phase-locked loop, can be expressed as:
r=a{circle around (x)}s+lN{circle around (x)}n. (IV.1)
The transmitted signal, s, can be retrieved from r as demonstrated:
Applying the condition in (III.5) that aTlN=0 yields:
(a{circle around (x)}I)Tr=(aTa)s. (IV.3)
Since aTa is a positive scalar, the result is a scaled copy of the signal, which is fed to the signal processor.
Relationship of Spread Signal to PLI
In summary, the system and method of the invention minimize a dominant source of interference in power-line communications (PLC). Since the source is periodic and has the same period as the mains, the system and method modify the transmitted PLC signals so that the result is orthogonal to this noise. The system and method work with a variety of PLC modulation techniques to improve the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio at the receiver.
One embodiment of a receiver pre-processor for implementing the invention is illustrated in
In one embodiment, the receiver is implemented by a digital processor 503. The PLL 504 may be analog or digital as long as it has a digital output. As illustrated in
The matrix multiplication in equation (IV.3) is equivalent to:
This multiplication can be obtained in one embodiment of a receiver by operating on the full-cycle snapshots r[k] using a finite impulse response (FIR) filter 508 using the spreading coefficients an (n=0, 1, . . . , N−1):
The output of the FIR filter 508 is provided to a demodulator 510 for detecting the messages m. Although not illustrated in
Thus,
As illustrated in
In one embodiment, the invention is a method for detecting the outbound messages comprising:
The combination of the transmitter 200 of
Using orthogonal spreading codes, it is possible to increase the system data throughput by a factor of N−1. To illustrate this, consider two spreading codes a1 and a2 that, in addition to satisfying the constraint in (III.5) are also orthogonal:
a1Ta2=0. (V.1)
If two transmitters broadcast signals s1 and s2, respectively, with these spreading codes and synchronize the symbols appropriately, the received signal, again in matrix form, is:
r=a1{circle around (x)}s1+a2{circle around (x)}s2+lN{circle around (x)}n. (V.2)
To receive the first transmission the receiver uses the matrix multiplication:
where the last equality follows by (V.1) and (III.5). Thus the signal from competing transmitters is canceled out by the receiver without any modification. One solution lies in finding an orthogonal set of codes that also satisfy the constraint in (III.5). The Hadamard matrix can be used to this end. Consider codes of length N=4 derived from the corresponding Hadamard matrix:
The rows are orthogonal to one another, which satisfies the condition in (V.1). Orthogonality to the first row guarantees that (III.5) is also satisfied, although row 1 is itself not a valid code. Using these codes three (3) transmitters may operate simultaneously, provided the spreading codes are synchronized in all three transmitters. Note that synchronization should not be difficult, since the mains provides the necessary timing.
In the example provided above where the data rate was 1.98 kbps, the total system throughput (assuming a spectral efficiency of 1) is:
Qb=1.98 kbps×3=5.94 kbps.
In general, the throughput will be:
Qb=(N−1)Rb. (V.5)
In summary, advantages of this approach over a conventional approach include computationally simple and efficient methods and systems whereby PLI may be mitigated thus increasing the achievable data rate, although baud is reduced by a factor of N and SNR increases (by a factor of N assuming perfect PLI cancellation), and spectral efficiency will increase by less than N so that the single-user data rate will suffer.
Another advantage is that the system and method provide a mechanism for multiple-user access, thus increasing the system throughput.
For purposes of illustration, programs and other executable program components, such as the operating system, are illustrated herein as discrete blocks. It is recognized, however, that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.
Although described in connection with an exemplary computing system environment, embodiments of the invention are operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. The computing system environment is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of any aspect of the invention. Moreover, the computing system environment should not be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with aspects of the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, mobile telephones, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
Embodiments of the invention may be described in the general context of components, data and/or computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, stored one or more tangible non-transitory computer storage media and executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include, but are not limited to, routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Aspects of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
In operation, computers and/or servers may execute the computer-executable instructions such as those illustrated herein to implement aspects of the invention.
The order of execution or performance of the operations in embodiments of the invention illustrated and described herein is not essential, unless otherwise specified. That is, the operations may be performed in any order, unless otherwise specified, and embodiments of the invention may include additional or fewer operations than those disclosed herein. For example, it is contemplated that executing or performing a particular operation before, contemporaneously with, or after another operation is within the scope of aspects of the invention.
Embodiments of the invention may be implemented with computer-executable instructions. The computer-executable instructions may be organized into one or more computer-executable components or modules on a tangible computer readable storage medium. Aspects of the invention may be implemented with any number and organization of such components or modules. For example, aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific computer-executable instructions or the specific components or modules illustrated in the figures and described herein. Other embodiments of the invention may include different computer-executable instructions or components having more or less functionality than illustrated and described herein.
When introducing elements of aspects of the invention or the embodiments thereof, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
In view of the above, it will be seen that several advantages of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results attained.
Not all of the depicted components illustrated or described may be required. In addition, some implementations and embodiments may include additional components. Variations in the arrangement and type of the components may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the claims as set forth herein. Additional, different or fewer components may be provided and components may be combined. Alternatively or in addition, a component may be implemented by several components.
Having described aspects of the invention in detail, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of aspects of the invention as defined in the appended claims. As various changes could be made in the above constructions, products, and methods without departing from the scope of aspects of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4101834, | Sep 13 1976 | General Electric Company | Methods and apparatus for rejection of interference in a digital communications system |
4658238, | Aug 24 1982 | DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC | Method and apparatus for providing selectively variable modulation signal for a carrier wave |
4914418, | Jan 03 1989 | DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC | Outbound detector system and method |
4918422, | Apr 25 1988 | DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC | Method and apparatus for extracting inbound information generated line-to-line in a multi-phase electric distribution system |
4963853, | Oct 16 1989 | DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC | Simultaneous inbound multi-channel communication system using electricity distribution network |
4996513, | Feb 20 1990 | DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC | Carrier stability erasure filling system for communications over electricity distribution network |
5185797, | Mar 27 1991 | Motorola, Inc. | Encrypted trunked control channel system |
5198796, | Jun 27 1991 | DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC | Outbound signal detector system and method |
5202903, | Mar 30 1990 | NEC Corporation | Noise-immune space diversity receiver |
5262755, | Dec 17 1991 | DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC | Inbound communications using electricity distribution network |
5473533, | Dec 02 1993 | GENERAL SIGNAL POWER SYSTEMS, INC , A WISCONSIN CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for efficient phase and frequency coherence locking optimized for digital systems |
5486805, | Jul 06 1993 | DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC | Method of receiving unsolicited messages on an electrical distribution network communications system |
5617084, | Sep 10 1993 | HEXAGRAM, INC | Apparatus for communicating utility usage-related information from a utility usage location to a utility usage registering device |
5696441, | May 13 1994 | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | Linear alternating current interface for electronic meters |
5844949, | Oct 09 1996 | General Electric Company | Power line communication system |
5856776, | Nov 24 1993 | REMOTE METERING SYSTEMS LTD | Method and apparatus for signal coupling at medium voltage in a power line carrier communications system |
5903594, | Apr 16 1997 | General Electric Company | Power line communications spread spectrum protocol |
6044106, | May 27 1996 | Sony Corporation | Receiving method and apparatus in which a demodulating status is determined and a noise power is detected |
6101214, | Apr 28 1997 | General Electric Company | Power line communications spread spectrum symbol timing and random phasing |
6172597, | Oct 22 1992 | AMPERION, INC | Electricity distribution and/or power transmission network and filter for telecommunication over power lines |
6278357, | Feb 04 1999 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc | Apparatus and method for implementing digital communications on a power line |
6320899, | Dec 26 1997 | Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute; SK Telecom Co., Ltd. | Two-dimensional demodulator in spread spectrum code division multiple access system with antenna array |
6356555, | Aug 25 1995 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Apparatus and method for digital data transmission using orthogonal codes |
6407987, | Apr 28 1989 | SATIUS HOLDING, INC | Transformer coupler for communication over various lines |
6424250, | Mar 08 1999 | ABB Schweiz AG | Communication system utilizing modified geometric harmonic modulation |
6616254, | Jun 20 1997 | Yitran Communications LTD | Code shift keying transmitter for use in a spread spectrum communications system |
6940396, | May 06 2003 | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | Concurrent phase communication in TWACS |
7496430, | Mar 08 2006 | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | Intelligent fault detector system and method |
7593378, | Jun 15 2006 | Silicon Laboratories Inc | SINR-based powerdown apparatus and method for a wireless communications systems |
20020072879, | |||
20020126741, | |||
20030128746, | |||
20040100898, | |||
20040218699, | |||
20040222698, | |||
20050055586, | |||
20060071776, | |||
20070194949, | |||
20070211401, | |||
20080030265, | |||
20080225965, | |||
20080273581, | |||
20090058728, | |||
20090201974, | |||
20090257471, | |||
20100073193, | |||
20100124288, | |||
20100172427, | |||
20110007782, | |||
20110109320, | |||
20110140911, | |||
20120037400, | |||
20120039400, | |||
20120257682, | |||
20130121426, | |||
20140010271, | |||
20150092868, | |||
EP1039715, | |||
WO211309, | |||
WO211386, | |||
WO211387, | |||
WO2008134257, | |||
WO2012021299, | |||
WO9013950, | |||
WO9840980, | |||
WO2010066289, | |||
WO9013950, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 08 2011 | RIEKEN, DAVID W | ACLARA POWER-LINE SYSTEMS INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 030449 | /0244 | |
Nov 30 2011 | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 31 2011 | ACLARA POWER-LINE SYSTEMS INC | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032128 | /0336 | |
Mar 28 2014 | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENT | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 032554 | /0912 | |
Mar 28 2014 | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | BMO HARRIS BANK N A | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032608 | /0055 | |
Apr 18 2014 | BMO HARRIS BANK, N A | Aclara Technologies, LLC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032715 | /0461 | |
Apr 18 2014 | ACLARA INTERNATIONAL LLC | PNC Bank, National Association | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032712 | /0931 | |
Apr 18 2014 | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | PNC Bank, National Association | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032712 | /0931 | |
Apr 18 2014 | METER READINGS HOLDING, LLC | PNC Bank, National Association | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032712 | /0931 | |
Aug 29 2016 | Aclara Meters LLC | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 039872 | /0227 | |
Aug 29 2016 | CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 039880 | /0908 | |
Aug 29 2016 | CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC | ACLARA METERS LLC F K A MRH METERS LLC | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 039880 | /0908 | |
Aug 29 2016 | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 039872 | /0227 | |
Feb 02 2018 | PNC Bank, National Association | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 045502 | /0776 | |
Feb 02 2018 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045245 | /0231 | |
Feb 02 2018 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | Aclara Meters LLC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 045245 | /0231 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 19 2020 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 26 2023 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 04 2019 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 04 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 04 2020 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 04 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 04 2023 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 04 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 04 2024 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 04 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 04 2027 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 04 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 04 2028 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 04 2030 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |