A transmitter transmits an outbound message signal via the power distribution system. The transmitter includes a spreader for spreading the spectrum of the communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal. A receiver despreads the spectrum of the received digitized signal and digitally demodulates the received despread signal to generate the message. The transmitted signal is orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system.

Patent
   9461700
Priority
Dec 02 2010
Filed
Nov 30 2011
Issued
Oct 04 2016
Expiry
Nov 30 2031
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
67
currently ok
7. In a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal, a method for detecting the outbound messages comprising:
receiving an analog outbound signal including an outbound message;
converting the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal, said method characterized by:
parsing synchronized with the mains signal the digitized signal into repeated full-cycle snapshots, wherein each full-cycle snapshot is repeated N times, where N is greater than one;
despreading the spectrum of the full-cycle snapshots using N spreading coefficients to provide a despread signal wherein the despreading comprises applying a spreading code to the full cycle snapshots of the parsed signal including despreading each full cycle snapshot by one of a series of spreading coefficients, each spreading coefficient defined as an where n=0, 1, . . . , N−1; and
digitally demodulating the despread signal to provide the outbound message.
3. In a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal, a method of generating the outbound messages comprising:
providing a communications signal including a message modulated on a carrier signal; and
transmitting an outbound message signal corresponding to the communications signal via the power distribution system, wherein said transmitting comprises:
locking the phase of the outbound message signal to the mains signal,
responsive to the phase of the mains signal, segmenting the communications signal into sections, each section corresponding to one mains cycle;
repeating each segmented section N times in the outbound message signal, where N is greater than one; and
spreading the spectrum of the segmented communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal such that the outbound message signal is orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system wherein the spreading comprises applying a spreading code to the segmented communications signal and wherein the applying comprises multiplying each mains cycle section of the segmented communications signal by one of a series of spreading coefficients, each spreading coefficient defined as an where n=0, 1, . . . , N−1.
1. In a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal, an apparatus comprising:
a signal modulator providing a communications signal s(t) including a message modulated on a carrier signal; and
a transmitter receiving the communications signal and transmitting a corresponding outbound message signal via the power distribution system, wherein said transmitter includes:
a phase-locked loop (pll) linked to the outbound message signal for locking the phase of the respective outbound message signals to the mains signal;
a repeater linked to and responsive to the pll for segmenting the communications signal into sections, each section corresponding to one mains cycle and repeating each section in the outbound message signal N times where N is greater than one; and
a spreader for spreading the spectrum of the segmented communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal such that the outbound message signal transmitted by the transmitter is substantially orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system wherein the spreader applies a spreading code to the segmented communications signal including multiplying each mains cycle section of the segmented communications signal by one of a series of spreading coefficients, each spreading coefficient defined as an where n=0, 1, . . . , N−1.
4. In a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal, a receiver for detecting the outbound messages, said receiver comprising:
an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter receiving the outbound signal including an outbound message and converting the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal; and
a digital processor connected to the A/D converter and adapted to receive the digitized signal, wherein the digital processor comprises:
a phase-locked loop (pll) connected to the source of the mains signal and locked to the mains signal; and
a parser connected to the pll and synchronized to the pll for parsing the received signal into repeated full-cycle snapshots, wherein each full-cycle snapshot is repeated N times, where N is greater than one;
said digital processor connected to the parser, said digital processor configured to receive the full-cycle snapshots and configured to despread the spectrum of the full-cycle snapshots using N spreading coefficients to provide a despread signal and configured to digitally demodulate the despread signal to provide the outbound message;
wherein the despreader applies a spreading code to the full cycle snapshots of the parsed signal including despreading each full cycle snapshot by one of a series of spreading coefficients, each spreading coefficient defined as an where n=0, 1, . . . , N−1.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a receiver comprising:
an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter receiving the outbound signal including an outbound message and converting the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal; and
a digital processor despreading the spectrum of the received digitized signal and digitally demodulating the received despread signal to provide the outbound message.
5. The receiver of claim 4 wherein the digital processor demodulates each of the despread snapshots.
6. The receiver of claim 4 further comprising:
a signal modulator providing a communications signal s(t) including a message modulated on a carrier signal; and
a transmitter receiving the communications signal and transmitting a corresponding outbound message signal via the power distribution system, wherein said transmitter includes:
a phase-locked loop (pll) linked to the outbound message signal for locking the phase of the respective outbound message signals to the mains signal;
a repeater linked to and responsive to the pll for segmenting the communications signal into sections, each section corresponding to one mains cycle; and,
a spreader for spreading the spectrum of the segmented communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal such that the outbound message signal transmitted by the transmitter is substantially orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the digital processor demodulates each of the despread snapshots.

This application is a U.S. national stage application of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/062510, filed Nov. 30, 2011, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/419,091, filed Dec. 2, 2010 and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/442,956, filed Feb. 15, 2011, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

Automated meter reading (AMR) and advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) are technologies used for the wireless monitoring and control of remote systems. Used by various utilities, these technologies allow users to centrally monitor and control the flow of resources to reduce environmental risks and efficiently manage operations.

Very low frequency (VLF) power line communications (PLC) presently has widespread use in AMR/AMI deployments and may also be useful for smart grid applications, largely due to its excellent propagative properties. However, noise within the VLF band is more energetic than at higher frequencies and without effective noise mitigation degrades channel capacity, possibly to the point of making the band impractical.

Paired transmission lines and other devices on the grid are not conducive to high frequency carrier signals. Signals within the VLF band (and those below it) have the advantage of propagating over very long distances. The TWACS communication system, resides within the extremely low frequency band (ELF) and has very little, if any, signal attenuation over distances up to 100 miles, for example. While successful low frequency band (LF) links have been demonstrated over distances of 2 to 6 km as have broadband links over distances of 1 km, in many deployments a complete substation-to-meter link cannot be established in these bands without introducing signal boosters or repeaters.

One disadvantage to using the VLF band is reduced data rate due to decreased available bandwidth. Another objection to VLF PLC is that the noise increases with decreasing frequency. Thus, while desirable propagative properties of the medium may yield high signal energies, the effect may be offset by a disproportionate increase in noise power.

In one embodiment, the invention comprises a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility wherein the system sends outbound messages and receives inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system supplying a mains signal.

In one aspect, a signal modulator provides a communications signal including a message modulated on a carrier signal. A transmitter receives the communications signal and transmits a corresponding outbound message signal via the power distribution system. The transmitter includes a phase-locked loop linked to the outbound message signal for locking the phase of the respective outbound message signals to the mains signal. The transmitter also includes a spreader for spreading the spectrum of the communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal. The outbound message signal is orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system.

In another aspect, a receiver includes an analog-to-digital converter receiving the outbound signal including an outbound message and converting the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal. A digital processor despreads the spectrum of the received digitized signal and digitally demodulates the received despread signal to provide the outbound message.

In another aspect, the combination of the transmitter and the receiver comprise a system according to one embodiment of the invention. It is also contemplated that the transmitter may be used with other receivers to comprise a system according to one embodiment of the invention. It is also contemplated that other transmitters in combination with the receiver may comprise a system according to one embodiment of the invention.

In another aspect, methods of the operation of the transmitter, receiver and system comprise embodiments of the invention.

Other objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.

FIG. 1 illustrates one example of a power spectral density of power-line noise with 60 Hz harmonics labeled along the horizontal x-axis.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a transmitter for generating signals for mains-synchronous power-line communication by means of a spreading sequence.

FIG. 3 illustrates the relationship of the transmitted signal to the mains wherein the mains-synchronous communication has a spreading length N=2.

FIG. 4 illustrates graphically the spectrum of one example of an unmodified signal and the signal after it has been modified (spread) according to one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 5 is block diagram of one embodiment of a receiver preprocessor and demodulator of the invention.

Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.

The system and method can be used to send any message over a power line. Many power line communications systems go from meter to meter, rather than substation to meter, for example. Although the noise may be modeled as a cyclostationary random process, the cyclostationary model for actual power line noise is unnecessarily restrictive so that the invention is based on modeling the VLF PLC channel as having a non-trivial wide-sense periodic component.

The system and method of the invention compensates for PLC noise in the low frequency band (LF) and below. In particular, the system and method of the invention addresses the preponderance of periodic noise in these bands. This has important ramifications for receiver configurations and, when employed, the invention increases the post-processed SNR, making VLF PLC a more attractive prospect for smart grid communications. Receivers and transmitted waveforms of the invention penetrate the periodic noise leaving only the weaker, cyclostationary noise with which to contend.

FIG. 1 illustrates one example of a power spectral density of a typical power-line voltage waveform plotted between 5 KHz and 5.5 KHz. FIG. 1 uses data obtained by sampling the output of a 120V wall outlet at 20 KHz for 87 seconds. A Welch periodogram was used with a window length of 1 second and an FFT size of 32768. FIG. 1 illustrates the presence of harmonics at integer multiples of 60 Hz. The harmonic nature of the noise is indicative of a temporal periodicity in the noise. This is consistent with the fact that the dominant signal present on a power line is the 60 Hz mains. The noise floor is at barely over −75 dB but there are narrowband sources at multiples of 60 Hz as much as 25 dB above the noise floor. This suggests a model in which noise comprises two sources, at least over this band. One source may be modeled as simply white noise (nominally AWGN). In this example, that would be the component at roughly −75 dB. The second source may be called power line interference (PLI), and represents the periodic component. Similar measurements at other sites may give a different result then illustrated in FIG. 1, although the harmonics will be present.

The system and method of the invention and, in particular, the algorithms used by the system and method of the invention estimate the noise directly according to the harmonics in FIG. 1, which are expected if the noise varies slowly from cycle to cycle. Since the mains-synchronous periodicity is modeled in the receiver and method of the invention, then the receiver fidelity is higher than receivers and methods which do not account for such harmonics. To illustrate this, consider a symbol length less than one mains cycle. If the noise over that symbol is examined without regard for noise outside the symbol interval, the harmonics illustrated in FIG. 1 will not be apparent. In fact, the harmonics will be spread out over bands proportional to the inverse of the symbol length, and thus blur together. In this example the noise could appear as white noise, although with a power of −50 dB or more.

According to an embodiment of the system and method of the invention, PLC signals are generated so that they are orthogonal to the PLI in a modified version of direct sequence spread spectrum (DS-SS). Signals may be generated using any modulation method, be it OFDM, BPSK (binary phase-shift keying), TWACS (two way automatic communications system) or others. However, before transmission the signal is operated on by a spreading code. This operation is phase-locked to the mains signal to ensure near orthogonality to the PLI. At the receiver the signal is despread, and it is in this despreading operation that PLI is essentially canceled, or at least sharply mitigated.

Advantages of this approach to PLC are that it may be applied to a wide range of PLC technologies, and it minimizes the need for sophisticated and computationally complex PLI estimation algorithms.

It is interesting to note that TWACS and the resonating transmitter are both mains synchronous systems of this sort, although they may not have previously been considered so.

Transmitter

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a transmitter 200 for generating signals for mains-synchronous power-line communication by means of a spreading sequence. A communication signal, s(t), is provided from a signal modulator 201. This can be any kind of communications signal, so long as it can be truncated into blocks. A repeater 202 breaks the communications signal into lengths equal to one mains cycle or less with the aid of a phase-locked loop (PLL) 204 that is phase-locked to the mains to synchronize the repeater 202. Each block can be an integer number of symbols, frames, or code words. Blocks do not have to correspond to a particular number of symbols. For example, in one embodiment, the communication signal s(t) is subdivided by the repeater 204 into sub-signals with duration equal to or less than each mains cycle. Coefficients an (n=0, 1, . . . , N−1) are spreading coefficients. Each cycle-length signal block from the repeater 204 is then transmitted N times. A modulator 206 modulates each nth cycle-length block by the real-valued scalar an. Note that the baud is reduced by a factor of N. The modulated blocks are converted from a digital signal to an analog mains signal by D/A converter 208. The analog signal is coupled to power lines of the power distribution system PDS 212 supplying the mains signal. The analog signal is transmitted over the power lines via a transformer or other coupling circuit illustrated as coupler 210 attached to the power lines to provide the transmitted output signal carried on the power distribution system PDS supplying the mains signal.

The transmitted output signal is coupled to the PLL 204 which, as noted above, synchronizes to the mains signal on the power distribution system PDS. This coupling occurs only insofar as both the coupler and the mains are connected to the mains. In some configurations, the presence of the transmitted signal could potentially degrade the PLL performance. In such configurations, some mitigative signal processing may be necessary in the PLL 204.

Thus, FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the invention for a transmitter 200 for use in a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility to send outbound messages over the utility's power distribution system PDS supplying a mains signal. The transmitter 200 is for use with the signal modulator 201 providing a communications signal s(t) including a message m modulated on a carrier signal. The transmitter 200 transmits an outbound message signal r(t) via the power lines of the power distribution system PDS. As noted above, the transmitter includes the phase-locked loop (PLL) 204 linked to the outbound message signal r(t) for locking the phase of the respective outbound message signals to the mains signal. The transmitter includes the repeater 202 responsive to the PLL 204 for segmenting the communications signal s(t) into sections corresponding to one mains cycle. In addition, the transmitter 200 includes a spreader 205 for spreading the spectrum of the segmented communications signal before transmitting the outbound message signal r(t) by applying a spreading code to the segmented communications signal.

As illustrated in FIG. 2, in one embodiment, the spreader 205 includes a source of a series of spreading coefficients and a multiplier for multiplying each section of the communications signal by the series of spreading coefficients an (n=0, 1, . . . , N−1). As noted below, the coefficients may be determined by subtraction so that the coefficients sum equals zero. As a result, the outbound message signal r(t) is orthogonal to a source of interference on the power distribution system PDS. This orthogonal aspect will be illustrated in more detail below.

In one embodiment, the invention is a method of generating the outbound messages comprising:

The relationship of the transmitted output signal to the mains is demonstrated in FIG. 3. In this example, the spreading length is N=2, and two successive blocks are transmitted. The relative phase between the mains and transmitted output signal is not important, only that they are phase-locked. That is, each signal block must begin at the same point in every mains cycle. The high-voltage mains signal may inadvertently induce a time-varying gain on the transmitted output signal. This will manifest itself as a modulation of the transmitted output signal with a strong mains component. Using this approach this will appear as windowing of each transmitted block.

Orthogonal Relationship of Transmitted Output Signal to PLI (Power Line Interference)

For a signal s(t) repeated N times with period T and spreading coefficients an, the transmitted signal is:

z ( t ) = s ( t ) * n = 0 N - 1 a n δ ( t - nT ) ( III .1 )
where δ(t) is the delta-Dirac function. The Fourier transform of the transmittal signal is thus:
Z(f)=S(f)H(f)  (III.2)
where S(f) is the Fourier transform of s(t) and H(f) is:

H ( f ) = - n = 0 N - 1 a n δ ( t - nT ) j 2 π f t t = n = 0 N - 1 a n j 2 π f nT = A d ( 2 π fT ) . ( III .3 )

Ad(λ) is the discrete Fourier transform of the sequence [a0 a1 . . . aN-1]. The signal spectrum:
Z(f)=S(f)Ad(2πfT)  (III.4)
can therefore be made to be zero at mains harmonics by selecting an so that Ad(2πfT)=0 at f=n/T for all integer n. That is, Ad(2πn)=0. The only requirement for this is that:

n = 0 N - 1 a n = 0. ( III .5 )

Equation (III.4) under the condition specified by equation (III.5), that the sum of the coefficients equal zero, is demonstrated graphically in FIG. 4. The upper waveform of FIG. 4 illustrates graphically the spectrum of one example of an unmodified signal and the lower waveform is the signal modified (spread) according to one embodiment of the invention. The resulting spectrum (i.e., the lower waveform) is modified so that there is no energy coincident with the mains harmonics. Transmission of the signal in this way results in a signal that is substantially orthogonal to the dominant source of interference on the power line.

Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) signals will necessarily have a sub-channel spacing of 1/T or more, where T is the symbol time. In practice it will be 1/T plus the guard interval. Sub-channel spacing will thus be very close to 1/T. The signal energy in any one channel is at least the energy in one 1/T sub-channel. To show that there is no energy loss in any one sub-channel consider the frequency interval [f, f+1/T]. By application of Parseval's theorem:

f f + 1 / T || Z ( f ) || 2 f = n = 0 N - 1 || a n || 2 f f + 1 / T || S ( f ) || 2 f . ( III .6 )
Thus, the signal in any one sub-channel is the total power transmitted in that band. In fact, repeating the signal N times, although with a spreading code, increases the signal energy by a factor of N, provided an are roots of unity.

Consider an OFDM system operating between 1 KHZ and 9 KHz and a spreading code of length N=4 where:

a0=1, a1=−1, a2=1, and a3=−1.

Table 1 summarizes the OFDM system parameters.

TABLE 1
Example OFDM
system parameters
N 4
bandwidth 8 KHz
Tg 0.1 ms
sub-carriers 132
sub-carrier 60.36 Hz
spacing
Rb (spectral 1.98 kbps
efficiency = 1)

The guard interval, Tg, is set to compensate for channel length. Let us assume 100×10−6 seconds, for no particular reason. For a 60 Hz mains, the symbol rate, Ts, must be such that:
Ts+Tg= 1/60
Ts=16.57 ms.
This corresponds to a sub-carrier spacing of 60.36 Hz. The number of subcarriers between 1 and 9 KHz is therefore 132. Assuming a spectral efficiency of 1, the data rate is:
Rb=132 bits/symbol×15 symbols/sec=1.98 kbps.

There are only 15 unique symbols per second because of the length-4 spreading. By equation (III.6) there is a 6 dB gain in transmitted energy. The data rate depends on modulation used (e.g. QPSK (quadrature phase-shift keying), BPSK, differential BPSK) and code rate. This, in turn, depends on the SNR, which will be larger because of the coding gain.

Receiver

Embodiments of systems and methods of the invention may be used with any modulation method that produces signals s(t) with duration no longer than a mains cycle. The spreading method and system described above may be inserted after the signal is generated and before it is transmitted. Likewise, at the receiver, the despreading method is performed prior to demodulation.

The received signal, parsed with the aid of phase-locked loop, can be expressed as:
r=a{circle around (x)}s+lN{circle around (x)}n.  (IV.1)

The transmitted signal, s, can be retrieved from r as demonstrated:

( a I ) T r = ( a I ) T ( a s ) + ( a I ) T ( l N n ) = a T a I T s + a T l N I T n . ( IV .2 )

Applying the condition in (III.5) that aTlN=0 yields:
(a{circle around (x)}I)Tr=(aTa)s.  (IV.3)

Since aTa is a positive scalar, the result is a scaled copy of the signal, which is fed to the signal processor.

Relationship of Spread Signal to PLI

In summary, the system and method of the invention minimize a dominant source of interference in power-line communications (PLC). Since the source is periodic and has the same period as the mains, the system and method modify the transmitted PLC signals so that the result is orthogonal to this noise. The system and method work with a variety of PLC modulation techniques to improve the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio at the receiver.

One embodiment of a receiver pre-processor for implementing the invention is illustrated in FIG. 5. The received signal, r(t), is digitized by an analog to digital (A/D) converter 502 controlled by a digital phase-locked loop (PLL) 504 locked to the mains signal so that the received signal is parsed into full-cycle snapshots stored in a full cycle buffer 506. Alternatively, an analog PLL may be used as indicated by the dashed line.

In one embodiment, the receiver is implemented by a digital processor 503. The PLL 504 may be analog or digital as long as it has a digital output. As illustrated in FIG. 5 in one embodiment, the A/D converter 502, the PLL 504 and/or the buffer 506 may be part of the digital processor 503.

The matrix multiplication in equation (IV.3) is equivalent to:

( a I ) T r ( n = 0 N - 1 a n z n ) r ( z ) . ( IV .4 )

This multiplication can be obtained in one embodiment of a receiver by operating on the full-cycle snapshots r[k] using a finite impulse response (FIR) filter 508 using the spreading coefficients an (n=0, 1, . . . , N−1):

H ( z ) = n = 0 N - 1 a n z n - N + 1 ( IV .5 )

The output of the FIR filter 508 is provided to a demodulator 510 for detecting the messages m. Although not illustrated in FIG. 5, it is contemplated that the demodulator 510 may be part of the digital processor 503. In general, parsing and despreading of a corresponding received spread output signal r(t) tends to result in eliminating deterministic harmonic components of the noise in an output signal, although the receiver 500 may have to deal with residual, non-periodic noise components.

Thus, FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of the invention for a receiver 500 for use in a two-way communications system used by an electrical utility in which outbound messages are sent from the utility to send receive inbound messages over the utility's power distribution system PDS supplying a mains signal. The receiver 500 detects the corresponding outbound messages m transmitted on the power lines. The A/D converter 502 receives the outbound signal including an outbound message m and converts the received signal to a corresponding digitized signal. The digital processor despreading the spectrum of the received digitized signal and digitally demodulating the received despread signal to provide the outbound message.

As illustrated in FIG. 5, the digital processor 503 implements the phase-locked loop (PLL) 504 locked to the mains signal. In addition, the digital processor 503 implements a parser synchronized to the PLL 504 for parsing the received signal into full-cycle snapshots and implements a despreader for despreading the snapshots. The parser as shown in FIG. 5 comprises the A/D converter 502 synchronized to the PLL 504 to create full-cycle snapshots stored in the buffer 506. In one embodiment, the despreader comprises the FIR filter 508 (illustrated in z notation) for multiplying and summing the snapshots by a matrix of the spreading coefficients an (n=0, 1, . . . , N−1) used by the transmitter 200.

In one embodiment, the invention is a method for detecting the outbound messages comprising:

The combination of the transmitter 200 of FIG. 2 and the receiver preprocessor 500 and demodulator of FIG. 5 comprises a system according to one embodiment of the invention. It is also contemplated that the transmitter 200 of FIG. 2 may be used with other receivers to comprise a system according to one embodiment of the invention. It is also contemplated that other transmitters in combination with the receiver preprocessor 500 and demodulator of FIG. 5 may comprise a system according to one embodiment of the invention.

Using orthogonal spreading codes, it is possible to increase the system data throughput by a factor of N−1. To illustrate this, consider two spreading codes a1 and a2 that, in addition to satisfying the constraint in (III.5) are also orthogonal:
a1Ta2=0.  (V.1)
If two transmitters broadcast signals s1 and s2, respectively, with these spreading codes and synchronize the symbols appropriately, the received signal, again in matrix form, is:
r=a1{circle around (x)}s1+a2{circle around (x)}s2+lN{circle around (x)}n.  (V.2)

To receive the first transmission the receiver uses the matrix multiplication:

( a 1 I ) T r = ( a 1 I ) T ( a 1 s 1 ) + ( a 1 I ) T ( a 2 s 2 ) + ( a 1 I ) T ( l N n ) = a 1 T a 1 s 1 + a 1 T a 2 s 2 + a 1 T l N n = a 1 T a 1 s 1 ( V .3 )
where the last equality follows by (V.1) and (III.5). Thus the signal from competing transmitters is canceled out by the receiver without any modification. One solution lies in finding an orthogonal set of codes that also satisfy the constraint in (III.5). The Hadamard matrix can be used to this end. Consider codes of length N=4 derived from the corresponding Hadamard matrix:

[ 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 - 1 1 - 1 - 1 1 ] . ( V .4 )

The rows are orthogonal to one another, which satisfies the condition in (V.1). Orthogonality to the first row guarantees that (III.5) is also satisfied, although row 1 is itself not a valid code. Using these codes three (3) transmitters may operate simultaneously, provided the spreading codes are synchronized in all three transmitters. Note that synchronization should not be difficult, since the mains provides the necessary timing.

In the example provided above where the data rate was 1.98 kbps, the total system throughput (assuming a spectral efficiency of 1) is:
Qb=1.98 kbps×3=5.94 kbps.

In general, the throughput will be:
Qb=(N−1)Rb.  (V.5)

In summary, advantages of this approach over a conventional approach include computationally simple and efficient methods and systems whereby PLI may be mitigated thus increasing the achievable data rate, although baud is reduced by a factor of N and SNR increases (by a factor of N assuming perfect PLI cancellation), and spectral efficiency will increase by less than N so that the single-user data rate will suffer.

Another advantage is that the system and method provide a mechanism for multiple-user access, thus increasing the system throughput.

For purposes of illustration, programs and other executable program components, such as the operating system, are illustrated herein as discrete blocks. It is recognized, however, that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.

Although described in connection with an exemplary computing system environment, embodiments of the invention are operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. The computing system environment is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of any aspect of the invention. Moreover, the computing system environment should not be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with aspects of the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, mobile telephones, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.

Embodiments of the invention may be described in the general context of components, data and/or computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, stored one or more tangible non-transitory computer storage media and executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include, but are not limited to, routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Aspects of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.

In operation, computers and/or servers may execute the computer-executable instructions such as those illustrated herein to implement aspects of the invention.

The order of execution or performance of the operations in embodiments of the invention illustrated and described herein is not essential, unless otherwise specified. That is, the operations may be performed in any order, unless otherwise specified, and embodiments of the invention may include additional or fewer operations than those disclosed herein. For example, it is contemplated that executing or performing a particular operation before, contemporaneously with, or after another operation is within the scope of aspects of the invention.

Embodiments of the invention may be implemented with computer-executable instructions. The computer-executable instructions may be organized into one or more computer-executable components or modules on a tangible computer readable storage medium. Aspects of the invention may be implemented with any number and organization of such components or modules. For example, aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific computer-executable instructions or the specific components or modules illustrated in the figures and described herein. Other embodiments of the invention may include different computer-executable instructions or components having more or less functionality than illustrated and described herein.

When introducing elements of aspects of the invention or the embodiments thereof, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.

In view of the above, it will be seen that several advantages of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results attained.

Not all of the depicted components illustrated or described may be required. In addition, some implementations and embodiments may include additional components. Variations in the arrangement and type of the components may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the claims as set forth herein. Additional, different or fewer components may be provided and components may be combined. Alternatively or in addition, a component may be implemented by several components.

Having described aspects of the invention in detail, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of aspects of the invention as defined in the appended claims. As various changes could be made in the above constructions, products, and methods without departing from the scope of aspects of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

Rieken, David W.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4101834, Sep 13 1976 General Electric Company Methods and apparatus for rejection of interference in a digital communications system
4658238, Aug 24 1982 DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC Method and apparatus for providing selectively variable modulation signal for a carrier wave
4914418, Jan 03 1989 DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC Outbound detector system and method
4918422, Apr 25 1988 DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC Method and apparatus for extracting inbound information generated line-to-line in a multi-phase electric distribution system
4963853, Oct 16 1989 DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC Simultaneous inbound multi-channel communication system using electricity distribution network
4996513, Feb 20 1990 DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS INC Carrier stability erasure filling system for communications over electricity distribution network
5185797, Mar 27 1991 Motorola, Inc. Encrypted trunked control channel system
5198796, Jun 27 1991 DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC Outbound signal detector system and method
5202903, Mar 30 1990 NEC Corporation Noise-immune space diversity receiver
5262755, Dec 17 1991 DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC Inbound communications using electricity distribution network
5473533, Dec 02 1993 GENERAL SIGNAL POWER SYSTEMS, INC , A WISCONSIN CORPORATION Method and apparatus for efficient phase and frequency coherence locking optimized for digital systems
5486805, Jul 06 1993 DISTRIBUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC Method of receiving unsolicited messages on an electrical distribution network communications system
5617084, Sep 10 1993 HEXAGRAM, INC Apparatus for communicating utility usage-related information from a utility usage location to a utility usage registering device
5696441, May 13 1994 ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC Linear alternating current interface for electronic meters
5844949, Oct 09 1996 General Electric Company Power line communication system
5856776, Nov 24 1993 REMOTE METERING SYSTEMS LTD Method and apparatus for signal coupling at medium voltage in a power line carrier communications system
5903594, Apr 16 1997 General Electric Company Power line communications spread spectrum protocol
6044106, May 27 1996 Sony Corporation Receiving method and apparatus in which a demodulating status is determined and a noise power is detected
6101214, Apr 28 1997 General Electric Company Power line communications spread spectrum symbol timing and random phasing
6172597, Oct 22 1992 AMPERION, INC Electricity distribution and/or power transmission network and filter for telecommunication over power lines
6278357, Feb 04 1999 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc Apparatus and method for implementing digital communications on a power line
6320899, Dec 26 1997 Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute; SK Telecom Co., Ltd. Two-dimensional demodulator in spread spectrum code division multiple access system with antenna array
6356555, Aug 25 1995 Google Technology Holdings LLC Apparatus and method for digital data transmission using orthogonal codes
6407987, Apr 28 1989 SATIUS HOLDING, INC Transformer coupler for communication over various lines
6424250, Mar 08 1999 ABB Schweiz AG Communication system utilizing modified geometric harmonic modulation
6616254, Jun 20 1997 Yitran Communications LTD Code shift keying transmitter for use in a spread spectrum communications system
6940396, May 06 2003 ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC Concurrent phase communication in TWACS
7496430, Mar 08 2006 ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC Intelligent fault detector system and method
7593378, Jun 15 2006 Silicon Laboratories Inc SINR-based powerdown apparatus and method for a wireless communications systems
20020072879,
20020126741,
20030128746,
20040100898,
20040218699,
20040222698,
20050055586,
20060071776,
20070194949,
20070211401,
20080030265,
20080225965,
20080273581,
20090058728,
20090201974,
20090257471,
20100073193,
20100124288,
20100172427,
20110007782,
20110109320,
20110140911,
20120037400,
20120039400,
20120257682,
20130121426,
20140010271,
20150092868,
EP1039715,
WO211309,
WO211386,
WO211387,
WO2008134257,
WO2012021299,
WO9013950,
WO9840980,
WO2010066289,
WO9013950,
////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Mar 08 2011RIEKEN, DAVID WACLARA POWER-LINE SYSTEMS INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0304490244 pdf
Nov 30 2011ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLC(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 31 2011ACLARA POWER-LINE SYSTEMS INC ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLCMERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0321280336 pdf
Mar 28 2014ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLCCERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENTPATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT0325540912 pdf
Mar 28 2014ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLCBMO HARRIS BANK N A SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0326080055 pdf
Apr 18 2014BMO HARRIS BANK, N A Aclara Technologies, LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327150461 pdf
Apr 18 2014ACLARA INTERNATIONAL LLCPNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327120931 pdf
Apr 18 2014ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLCPNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327120931 pdf
Apr 18 2014METER READINGS HOLDING, LLCPNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0327120931 pdf
Aug 29 2016Aclara Meters LLCMORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0398720227 pdf
Aug 29 2016CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLCACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLCRELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS0398800908 pdf
Aug 29 2016CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLCACLARA METERS LLC F K A MRH METERS LLCRELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS0398800908 pdf
Aug 29 2016ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLCMORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0398720227 pdf
Feb 02 2018PNC Bank, National AssociationACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLCTERMINATION AND RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT0455020776 pdf
Feb 02 2018MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC ACLARA TECHNOLOGIES LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0452450231 pdf
Feb 02 2018MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC Aclara Meters LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0452450231 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Mar 19 2020M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Oct 26 2023M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Oct 04 20194 years fee payment window open
Apr 04 20206 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 04 2020patent expiry (for year 4)
Oct 04 20222 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Oct 04 20238 years fee payment window open
Apr 04 20246 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 04 2024patent expiry (for year 8)
Oct 04 20262 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Oct 04 202712 years fee payment window open
Apr 04 20286 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 04 2028patent expiry (for year 12)
Oct 04 20302 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)