An apparatus for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion is presented. The apparatus includes at least one inlet for receiving the emulsion, at least one outlet for discharging the emulsion after coalescing the dispersed phase, and at least one article disposed between the inlet and the outlet. The article includes a plurality of regions disposed on a surface in a predefined pattern, wherein a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, and a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, and wherein the pattern includes a plurality of inter-connected regions that are substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase. A related article is also presented.
|
1. An apparatus for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion, the apparatus comprising:
at least one inlet for receiving the emulsion;
at least one outlet for discharging the emulsion after coalescing the dispersed phase; and
at least one article disposed between the inlet and the outlet, the article comprising:
a plurality of regions disposed on a surface in a predefined pattern, wherein a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, and a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase,
wherein the pattern comprises a plurality of inter-connected regions that are substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase.
2. The apparatus of
3. The apparatus of
4. The apparatus of
6. The apparatus of
7. The apparatus of
8. The apparatus of
10. The apparatus of
11. The apparatus of
12. The apparatus of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The invention generally relates to an apparatus and an article for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion. Particularly, the invention relates to an apparatus and an article for enhancing the coalescence of oil in oil-water emulsions.
Separation of oil from water is one of the key processes in most oil recovery applications. The oil is typically mixed with water, which may be existent in a well or artificially injected to boost the rate of oil recovery. Oil-water separation is also commonly used to reduce the discharged oil fraction to comply with environmental regulations. Sub-sea separators can reduce the power needed to pump produced fluid from the sea bed to the top side, by separating out water from oil prior to pumping.
For sub-sea oil recovery, there may be an economic incentive to make the separation apparatus passive, compact, robust and durable. Further, it may be desirable to operate the sub-sea separator units without external power. Non-limiting example of a suitable sub-sea separator unit is a gravity separator. The driving forces for separation in a gravity separator are oil/water specific gravity difference and the oil/water interface energy. However, the large size of typical gravity separators makes them unsuitable for sub-sea installations. The plate pack separator (PPS) configuration is one of the potential designs for reducing the size of the gravity separators. One of the challenges of plate pack separators is the degradation in separation efficiency over time due to the fouling of corrugated plate surfaces, and resulting loss in surface functionality. In plate pack separators, flat parallel plates are typically used to reduce fouling. However, flat parallel plates have poorer coalescence efficiency compared to corrugated plates.
Accordingly, there is a need for improved oil-water separators. Further, it may be desirable to have oil water separators with improved coalescence efficiency.
One embodiment is directed to an apparatus for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion. The apparatus includes at least one inlet for receiving the emulsion, at least one outlet for discharging the emulsion after coalescing the dispersed phase, and at least one article disposed between the inlet and the outlet. The article includes a plurality of regions disposed on a surface in a predefined pattern, wherein a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, and a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, and wherein the pattern includes a plurality of inter-connected regions that are substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase.
Another embodiment is directed to an apparatus for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion. The apparatus includes at least one inlet for receiving the emulsion, at least one outlet for discharging the emulsion after coalescing the dispersed phase, and at least one article disposed between the inlet and the outlet. The article includes a plurality of regions disposed on a surface in a predefined pattern, wherein a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, and a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase. The pattern further includes a plurality of disconnected regions that are substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, wherein the pattern defines at least one flow path for the continuous phase, and wherein the pattern defines at least one flow path for a coalesced dispersed phase to drain from the surface.
Another embodiment is directed to an article for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion. The article includes a plurality of regions disposed on a surface in a predefined pattern, wherein a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, and a portion of the plurality of regions is substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase. The pattern further includes a plurality of inter-connected regions that are substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
The invention relates generally relates to an apparatus and an article for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion. Particularly, the invention relates to an apparatus and an article for enhancing the coalescence of oil in oil-water emulsions.
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill, having the benefit of this disclosure.
In the following specification and the claims, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, the term “or” is not meant to be exclusive and refers to at least one of the referenced components being present and includes instances in which a combination of the referenced components may be present, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification and claims, may be applied to modify any quantitative representation that could permissibly vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term or terms, such as “about,” is not limited to the precise value specified. In some instances, the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument for measuring the value.
As used herein, the terms “may” and “may be” indicate a possibility of an occurrence within a set of circumstances; a possession of a specified property, characteristic or function; and/or qualify another verb by expressing one or more of an ability, capability, or possibility associated with the qualified verb. Accordingly, usage of “may” and “may be” indicates that a modified term is apparently appropriate, capable, or suitable for an indicated capacity, function, or usage, while taking into account that in some circumstances, the modified term may sometimes not be appropriate, capable, or suitable.
As discussed in detail below, some embodiments of the invention are directed to an apparatus for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion.
The term “emulsion”, as used herein, includes a mixture of two or more immiscible liquids. In one embodiment, one component of the emulsion (also referred to as the dispersed phase) is stably or unstably dispersed in the other component (also referred to as the continuous phase). It may take seconds to hours to fully separate the mixture of phases in the emulsion by letting them stand undisturbed. In one embodiment, the dispersed phase includes an organic phase and the continuous phase includes an aqueous phase. In another embodiment, the dispersed phase includes an aqueous phase and the continuous phase includes an organic phase. The term “aqueous phase”, as used herein, refers to a phase of the emulsion that primarily includes water. The term “organic phase”, as used herein, refers to a phase of the emulsion that primarily includes hydrocarbons.
In some embodiments, the emulsion is of the type found in oil production. In some embodiments, the emulsion is of the type found in one or both of chemical production or biological production. In particular embodiments, the emulsion includes crude oil. In some embodiments, the crude oil includes liquid hydrocarbons. In some embodiments, the crude oil may further include gaseous hydrocarbons, solid hydrocarbons, salts, metals, impurities, and combinations thereof. As noted earlier, in some embodiments, the crude oil further includes an aqueous component. In certain embodiments, the dispersed phase is oil and the continuous phase is water, and the emulsion is an oil-in-water emulsion. In such instances, the apparatus is configured to enhance coalescence of oil droplets in an oil-in-water emulsion.
An article 110 for enhancing the coalescence of a dispersed phase in an emulsion is also presented, as indicated in
Non-limiting examples of suitable configurations for the article 110 include a plate, a tube, a needle, a sphere, a mesh, a grid, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the article includes a substantially planar surface. In some embodiments, the article is configured in the form of a plate. In some embodiments, the article is configured in the form of a substantially flat plate. The term “substantially flat” as used herein means that plate is free of ridges and grooves, such as, for example present in corrugated plates. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that a substantially flat surface may provide for reducing fouling and improved coalescence/separation efficiency over a period of time.
An article 110 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention is further schematically illustrated in
The terms “substantially wetting” and “substantially non-wetting” as used herein are defined in terms of the contact angle defined by the dispersed phase (for example, oil) on the article's surface when surrounded by the continuous phase. As used herein, the term “contact angle” is the static angle formed between a stationary drop of a reference liquid and a horizontal surface upon which the droplet is disposed, as measured at the liquid/substrate interface in a continuous fluid medium. Contact angle of a drop of dispersed phase with a surface submerged inside the continuous phase may be used as a measure of the wettability of the surface. For example, if the dispersed phase liquid drop spreads completely on the surface and forms a film, the contact angle is 0 degrees. Thus, the term “substantially wetting” as used herein means that the contact angle of the dispersed phase with respect to the surface is less than 90 degrees. The term “substantially non-wetting” as used herein means that the contact angle of the dispersed phase with respect to the surface is greater than 90 degrees.
In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 122 are characterized by a contact angle with respect to the dispersed phase that is less than 90 degrees. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 122 are characterized by a contact angle with respect to the dispersed phase that is less than 30 degrees. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 122 are characterized by a contact angle with respect to the dispersed phase that is less than 10 degrees. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 122 are characterized by a contact angle with respect to the dispersed phase that is in a range from about 0 degrees to about 60 degrees.
In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 124 are characterized by a contact angle with respect to the dispersed phase that is greater than 90 degrees. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 124 are characterized by a contact angle with respect to the dispersed phase that is greater than 120 degrees. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 124 are characterized by a contact angle with respect to the dispersed phase that is greater than 150 degrees. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 124 are characterized by a contact angle with respect to the dispersed phase that is in a range from about 90 degrees to about 150 degrees.
Thus, by way of example, as noted earlier, the emulsion may include oil dispersed in water. In such instances, the plurality of regions 122 may be oleophilic and the plurality of regions 124 may be oleophobic. In some such instances, the plurality of regions 122 and 124 may be also characterized by the water contact angle in air. For example, in some such instances, the plurality of regions 122 may be hydrophobic and the plurality of regions 124 may be hydrophilic. In some other instances, the plurality of regions 122 may be oleophilic and the plurality of regions 124 may be hydrophilic.
The terms hydrophilic, hydrophobic, oleophilic and oleophobic refer to properties of the surface with air as the surrounding environment. Thus, a surface referred to as hydrophobic is substantially non-wetted by water when placed in air. A surface referred to as hydrophilic is substantially wetted by water when placed in air. A surface referred to as oleophobic is substantially non-wetted by oil when placed in air. A surface referred to as oleophilic is substantially wetted by oil when placed in air.
In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 122 may be superhydrophobic and the plurality of regions 124 may be hydrophilic. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 122 may be hydrophobic and the plurality of regions 124 may be superhydrophilic. In certain embodiments, the plurality of regions 122 may be superhydrophobic and the plurality of regions 124 may be superhydrophilic. As used herein, the term “superhydrophobic” means that a water contact angle in air is greater than 150 degrees. As used herein, the term “superhydrophilic” means that a water contact angle in air is less than 10 degrees.
The hydrophobic or superhydrophobic regions may include any suitable hydrophobic material, such as, for example, a siloxane material, a silicate, a fluorinated material, a hydrocarbon material, a hydrophobic ceramic, a hydrophobic polymer, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the hydrophobic or superhydrophobic regions may include a fluorocarbon, such as, for example, a fluorocarbon polymer. In certain embodiments, the hydrophobic regions may include poly(tetrafluoroethylene).
Similarly, the hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions may include any suitable hydrophilic material, such as, for example, a ceramic, glass, a hydrophilic polymer, a metal, a metal alloy, a metal oxide, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the hydrophilic regions may include a ceramic material, such as, for example, yttrium aluminum garnet. In certain embodiments, the hydrophilic regions may include a metal alloy, such as, for example steel.
In some embodiments, one or both of the hydrophobic regions and the hydrophilic regions may include a textured surface. The term “textured surface” as used herein means a plurality of features are disposed on the surface. Examples of such features include, without limitation, elevations (such as cylindrical posts, rectangular prisms, pyramidal prisms, dendrites, nanorods, nanotubes, particle fragments, abrasion marks, and the like); and depressions (such as holes, wells, and the like).
In some embodiments, the textured surface may be formed by roughening the surface, particle deposition, or combinations thereof. Texturing or roughening the surface may change the contact angle of water on the surface. A texture that increases the tortuosity of the surface but maintains the contact between the water droplet and the surface may result in increasing the contact angle of a hydrophobic material and decreasing the contact angle of a hydrophilic material.
In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 120 may include textured hydrophilic regions. In some such instances, at least a portion of the plurality of regions 124 may include a hydrophilic material that is textured. Non-limiting examples of suitable textured hydrophilic regions may include, roughened steel, ceramic nanoparticle coating, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 120 may include hierarchical textured superhydrophilic regions, that is, textures or features having dimensions of one scale on top of features having dimensions of another scale. In some embodiments, the plurality of regions 120 may include nano-textured superhydrophilic regions. In some embodiments, superhydrophilic surfaces may be desirable as they provide the lowest contact angle for oil in water on patterned areas, which turn superhydrophobic, as well as lowest adhesion to oil on unpatterned areas which remain superhydrophilic.
As noted earlier, the plurality of regions 120 are disposed in a predefined pattern. In some embodiments, the pattern was defined to allow for creation of three-phase boundaries. The present inventors have surprisingly discovered that coalescence of free oil with sessile drops is instantaneous at three-phase oil-water-solid boundaries. The main difference between oil on a film and oil at a three-phase boundary is the ability of oil to deviate from its existing position when external forces are applied on it. Hence, when a new oil drop impinges on an oil film, all points on film's surface are free to move and the film itself may deform as a result of upward force exerted by incoming oil drop. In contrast, oil molecules at three-phase boundaries are not free to move because of surface adhesion forces. Hence, during formation of a water drainage layer, water may migrate into zones of oil deformation and drain away quickly from zones where oil is not free to deform, that is, three-phase boundaries. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that the rapid drainage of water from the three-phase boundary hastens coalescence (
The three-phase boundaries on the surface 111 may be created by forming regions 122, 124 and 126 on the surface in a pre-defined pattern. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that the pattern of hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions, for example, may allow for creation of sessile oil drops and three-phase boundaries on such a surface.
In some embodiments, the pattern includes a plurality of inter-connected regions 124 that are substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, as shown in
Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that it may be desirable that the plurality of hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions 124 define a substantially unrestricted path for water to flow from one edge of the article to the other. Thus, in some embodiments, the hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions 124 are continuously connected such that the water move inwards from an edge and displaces oil adhered to the hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions 124.
It may be also desirable to have defined paths in the pattern to drain the coalesced dispersed phase from the surface 111. In some embodiments, the pattern further defines at least one flow path 123 for a coalesced dispersed phase to drain from the surface 111, as indicated in
In some embodiments, the pattern further includes a plurality of disconnected regions 126 that are substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, as shown in
In some embodiments, it may be desirable that the disconnected regions 126 are disposed proximate to the flow path for the coalesced oil droplets 123, such that, when they capture oil and expand in size, they can coalesce with the oil in the oil flow path 123, and revert back to their original size.
In certain embodiments, the pattern includes a plurality of disconnected regions 126 that are substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase. In some such embodiments, the pattern further defines at least one flow path 125 for the continuous phase, and further defines at least one flow path 123 for a coalesced dispersed phase to drain from the surface 111.
The width and spacing of the regions 122, 124, and 126 may be designed to allow for one or more of increased likelihood of capturing incoming oil drops, fast drainage of coalesced oil from the surface, and increased likelihood of water displacing oil from hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions.
As mentioned previously, it may be desirable to increase the chance for droplets to meet three phase boundaries. When an incoming oil droplet hits the boundary of a sessile oil drop, coalescence may happen very quickly. Surfaces patterned with hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions tend to capture oil on the hydrophobic regions and be oil-free in the hydrophilic regions. By appropriately designing the surface patterns, the trapped oil on such surfaces may act as a speed bump for incoming drops that tend to glide along a surface. However, after reduction in speed, the oil drops may still glide away without coalescing on other oil drops sticking to the surface, as the oil coalescence may be hindered by water that surrounds the oil drops. To encourage coalescence, the trapped oil patterns on the surface may be designed such that the incoming drops follow a tortuous path with several chances of impacting a three-phase boundary, thereby increasing chances of coalescence.
A method for manufacturing an article configured to enhance the coalescence of a dispersed phase from a continuous phase in an emulsion, is also presented. The method is illustrated with reference to
In some embodiments, the step of forming the pattern includes providing an article 110 having a surface 111. In some such instances, the surface 111 may be substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase. The method may further include disposing a plurality of regions 122 that are substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase on the surface 111 to form the pattern. Thus, by way of example, the dispersed phase may be oil and the method may include providing an article 110 having a hydrophilic or superhydrophilic surface 111. The method may further include disposing a plurality of hydrophobic or superhydrophobic regions 122 on the surface 111 to define a pattern.
In some embodiments, the method may include providing an article 110 having a textured hydrophilic surface 111. In some embodiments, the method includes providing, hierarchical textured superhydrophilic regions, that is, textures or features having dimensions of one scale on top of features having dimensions of another scale. As noted earlier, in some the textured hydrophilic surface 111 may be formed by roughening the surface, particle deposition, or combinations thereof.
In certain embodiments, the method includes roughening a metal or metal alloy plate to form a textured hydrophilic surface 111. In certain embodiments, the method includes plasma spray coating a ceramic composition on the surface to a form a textured superhydrophilic surface 111. Suitable plasma spray coating techniques are described in co-pending patent application Ser. No. 13/723,301, filed on 21 Dec. 2012; and Ser. No. 14/037,790, filed on 26 Sep. 2013, incorporated herein in their entirety, unless directly contradictory to the teachings described herein.
As alluded to previously, the method may further include disposing a plurality of hydrophobic or superhydrophobic regions 122 on the surface 111 to define a pattern. In some embodiments, the plurality of hydrophobic or superhydrophobic regions 122 are disposed on the surface 111 using any suitable technique, such as, for example, stencil printing, screen printing, pad printing, vapor deposition, spraying, or combinations thereof.
In certain embodiments, the method further includes disposing a hydrophobic material on the surface 111 using stencil printing. In certain embodiments, the method further includes disposing a hydrophobic material (such, as a hydrophobic ink) on the surface 111 using an ink-disposal device, for example, a felt tip pen.
In some other instances, the surface 111 may have regions 122, which are substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase. In such instances, the method may further include disposing a plurality of regions 124 that are substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase on the surface 111 to form the pattern. Thus, by way of example, the dispersed phase may be oil and the method may include providing an article 110 having a hydrophobic or superhydrophobic surface 111. The method may further include disposing a plurality of hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions 124 on the surface 111 to define a pattern.
In some embodiments, the method further includes forming the pattern such that the a plurality of regions that are substantially non-wetting with respect to the dispersed phase 124 are interconnected, as shown in
Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that it may be desirable that the plurality of hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions 124 define a substantially unrestricted path for water to flow from one edge of the plate to the other. Thus, in some embodiments, the hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions 124 are continuously connected such that the water move inwards from and edge and displaces oil adhered to the hydrophilic or superhydrophilic regions 124.
Further, it may be desirable to have defined paths in the pattern to drain the coalesced oil from the surface 111. In some embodiments, the method further includes defining at least one flow path 123 for a coalesced dispersed phase to drain from the surface 111 by disposing a plurality of inter-connected regions 122 that are substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase.
In some embodiments, the method may further include forming a plurality of disconnected regions 126 that are substantially wetting with respect to the dispersed phase, as shown in
As mentioned earlier, in conventional surfaces for enhancing coalescence of oil in oil-water emulsions, the coalescence efficiency of the surface decreases as it becomes covered with oil. In contrast, oil-resisting surfaces (for example, hydrophilic surfaces), which do not get covered by oil completely, tend to behave randomly over time. Embodiments of the present invention overcome these drawbacks of homogenous surfaces by introducing a pattern of hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions, designed to enhance coalescence and drainage of oil. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that pattern of hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions impedes the motion of impinging oil drops, and creates oil-water-solid three phase boundaries, which may enhance speed of oil droplet coalescence. Further, in some embodiments, these patterns have been designed to release accumulated oil on the surface continuously, such that that the article functions reliably over time. In some embodiments, the articles as described herein may be used in oil-water separators that are unpowered, small and robust, thereby enabling use in sub-sea applications.
Roughened steel plates with hydrophilic/phobic patterns, heretofore referred to as ‘patterned steel plates’ were made by cutting 6″×24″ plates from ⅛″ sheets of 2205 stainless steel. These plates were grit blasted on both sides using abrasives. The grit size was found to control easy release of oil when the surfaces were immersed in an oil-water environment. Small 4″×4″ coupons were grit blasted with different grit sizes and for the same time duration. The grit blasted coupons were immersed into a bath (described below) to estimate the time required for oil release from the surface, and to allow it to get covered with water. After determining the appropriate grit size that provided fastest release of oil from the surface, the same grit size was selected for grit blasting all steel plates. Both sides of the steel plates were grit blasted to eliminate effects of bowing from roughening one side alone. Further, the roughness of each plate was measured and controlled during grit blasting.
It was also noted that the smooth steel surfaces did not release oil quickly in an oil/water environment. Rougher surfaces likely performed better because of the increase in oleophobic surface area seen by a sessile drop on the surface. The related phenomenon of roughness increasing the contact angles is known in the literature. It is also noted that the smooth surfaces could not adhere very well to the Teflon paint and hence rough surfaces were preferred.
The roughened plates were wiped with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and coated with a pattern of horizontal and vertical stripes of Teflon. The Teflon paint was purchased in amorphous form dissolved in a solvent. The solvent evaporated within few minutes of the deposition to leave a dry film. The patterned plate was baked at 300 F for 10 minutes in an industrial oven with forced convection to improve adhesion of Teflon paint to surfaces.
The Teflon paint was applied using a felt tip pen mounted on a computer controlled moving platform of an industrial cutting table. The felt tip pen was modified specially for the purpose of reliably depositing Teflon paint over a large area. At the end of each patterning process, the pen's reservoir was filled with Teflon paint to make up for the loss in weight. This process ensured excellent repeatability of Teflon patterns painted on all plates.
Superhydrophilic nano-textured ceramic plates patterned with Teflon paint, heretofore referred to as ‘patterned nano-plates’ were fabricated using a plasma spray process followed by stencil-based printing. A liquid fed radial injection plasma spray technique was used to create the nano-textured surfaces. Suitable plasma spray coating techniques is described in co-pending patent application Ser. No. 13/723,301, filed on 21 Dec. 2012; incorporated herein in its entirety, unless directly contradictory to the teachings described herein.
Generally, a plasma spray technology involves melting small feed particles in a rotating plasma plume and spraying the same at high velocity using a robotic arm that rasters across the substrate.
Steel plates having dimensions 6″×24″ were cut from ⅛″ sheets of 2205 stainless steel, and were grit blasted prior to plasma spray coating to improve adhesion of the coating to the surface. Yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) ceramic particles (<10 micron) were suspended in ethanol and were sprayed on the steel plates by the liquid fed radial injection plasma spray technique. Several spray parameters, for example, distance from the target, injector size and type, raster speed, slurry feed rate, slurry concentration, substrate temperature, and mean particle size of slurry, were optimized to obtain the nano-textures on surfaces. After the coating step was completed, the uncoated sides were heat treated to reduce bowing due to the coating process. Nano-textured ceramic coatings made by this process were typically about 10 microns to about 100 microns thick, and were super-hydrophilic.
These nano-textured surfaces were further patterned with Teflon paint using stencil printing and roll-on printer. The stencil-based painting process was optimized with respect to the stencil material, stencil thickness, paint applicator shape and size, application speed, application pressure, applicator wetness etc.
Based on trial and error, a few mils thick transparent plastic sheet was deemed to be an apt stencil since its thickness did not allow too much or too little contact between the roller and nano-surface. The transparency of the sheet allowed real-time assessment of bleeding and adjustments to the painting process. A relatively round paint head was found to be most effective in preventing bleeding of paint under the stencil as compared to flatter paint heads. The roller was kept relatively low on paint to further mitigate bleeding of paint. Given the relatively high volatility of the solvent, the roller could not be wetted from the inside without losing significant amount of paint to evaporation. So, the roller was recharged with paint by manually dropping a few milliliters of paint after running it dry. Similarly, a large roller area also increased rate of evaporation. Hence a 1″ wide and a 0.5″ thick roller was used to minimize evaporation. The roll painting process permitted coating of 5 6″×24″ plates per operator per hour.
Patterned plates were heat treated at 300° F. for 10 minutes to improve adhesion of Teflon paint to the nano-textured ceramic surface. In some cases, the porous structure of the nano-coatings reduced the water-wicking hydrophilic ability of the coating. To improve the water wettability of these surfaces, the surfaces were exposed to flowing tap water such that the air trapped in the air pockets was ejected. These patterned surfaces were then tested for oil coalescence efficiency using the procedure described later.
A lab-scale coalescence efficiency test (
Tests were conducted by immersing samples with patterned plates facing downwards inside an oil/water bath. The bath itself was a transparent container filled with approximately 90% by volume deionized (DI) water and 10% by volume Conoco Phillips base oil, which formed a layer over water. Oil was slowly added to the bath after adding water to ensure no free oil drops or emulsions were created in the process. Few minutes of settling allowed a distinct oil layer to be formed on top of water with no visible oil suspended in the water phase.
The bath also contained three needles positioned at different locations along the bottom wall. The needles were used to dispense oil drops of relatively uniform sizes and were supplied with oil from a syringe pump. Oil drops from needles were dispensed approximately at rate of 3-6 drops a minute per needle.
Before immersing freshly prepared plates into the water bath, the plates were squirted with deionized (DI) water to ensure that the hydrophilic regions on the plates were covered with water. Tested plates were further stored in DI water to avoid hydrophilic regions on the plates wicking in residual oil left on the plates after testing. These plates were then retrieved from the storage water bath and quickly immersed into the test bath with oil/water.
Plates were tilted at an angle of about ˜15-20° degrees from the horizontal plane, and immersed at a uniform rate into the oil/water bath using a Velmex linear stage. Immersion was stopped once the bottom of the plate came within a few millimeters of the needles that were projecting upwards. During immersion, the plate was forced to touch oil first, which resulted in formation of an oil film on top of the plate's surface. If the sample was designed correctly, this oil film was quickly displaced by water in the hydrophilic regions of the sample. A waiting period of few seconds to a minute (depending on the plate) was typically needed to allow water to displace oil, with water percolation starting at bottom of the plate and finishing at the top. If the oil film did not release completely from hydrophilic regions of sample, the sample was deemed to have failed the test and not tested further. This elimination criterion ensured that the chosen plates were robust enough to retain water on the hydrophilic regions after full exposure to oil.
Following the wait period, the plates were moved upwards by approximately one inch to allow enough room above the tip of the needles for oil drops to form and impinge on the sample. Oil drops were simultaneously dispensed at three locations on samples and the number of drops coalescing upon impingement was noted. Drops were counted as ‘coalesced’ if they attached to any region on the sample before reaching the oil/water interface. After 15-20 drops were dispensed, samples were either (a) moved horizontally so that oil drops would impinge at different locations or (b) removed from oil/water bath and immersed back within a few seconds into bath. A typical test involved dispensing of ˜100 drops at different locations with at least three different conditions on a sample. Table 1 provides the details of tests conducted on Comparative Examples 1-2 and Example 1.
Plates used for generating the data shown in
TABLE 1
Drop
Coating
Pattern
Pattern
diameter
Example
Substrate
material
material
type
(mm)
Comparative
Stainless steel
None
None
None
3-4
Example 1
Comparative
Glass
Teflon
None
None
3-4
Example 2
Example 1
Roughened
YAG
Teflon
As show
3-4
stainless steel
in FIG. 2
Results shown in
The present invention has been described in terms of some specific embodiments. They are intended for illustration only, and should not be construed as being limiting in any way. Thus, it should be understood that modifications can be made thereto, which are within the scope of the invention and the appended claims. Furthermore, all of the patents, patent applications, articles, and texts which are mentioned above are incorporated herein by reference.
Kulkarni, Ambarish Jayant, Bahadur, Vaibhav, Sivaramakrishnan, Shyam, Gao, Yifan, Leblanc, Luc Stephane, Sittner, Oscar Max, Glomsaker, Terje
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 11596889, | Oct 23 2019 | PALL EUROPE LIMITED; Pall Corporation | Air filter and method of use |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3628665, | |||
| 4203849, | Nov 14 1974 | Apparatus for cleaning water containing foreign particles such as suspended matters or oil | |
| 4530767, | Apr 05 1979 | Method of oil coagulation utilizing entrained gas | |
| 4534860, | Jul 11 1984 | PYRONICS, INC | Water-oil separating system for use with centrifugal type separator |
| 5242604, | Jan 10 1992 | THE TAYLOR GROUP, INC | Lateral flow coalescing multiphase plate separator |
| 5494586, | Jun 20 1990 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Oil-water separation apparatus |
| 5656173, | Mar 05 1996 | National Tank Company | Method of removing dispersed oil from an oil in water emulsion employing aerated solutions within a coalescing media |
| 5762810, | Nov 22 1996 | Coalescing oil/water separator | |
| 5772877, | Feb 02 1996 | MARSH, WALLIS | Apparatus for magneto-fluidic water/oil separation |
| 5792350, | Jun 14 1996 | OSR Systems Ltd. | Oil spill recovery vessel |
| 6048376, | Aug 03 1998 | DOOSAN INTERNATIONAL USA, INC | Combination baffle and filter element system for removing oil from an oil/gas mixture |
| 6110352, | Dec 15 1995 | Ebara Corporation | Method and apparatus for separating oil from water in wastewater containing an emulsified oil |
| 6905597, | May 26 2000 | Device for recovering oil from an oil-slick on a stretch of water | |
| 6997974, | Dec 20 2002 | Honeywell International, Inc. | High strength and ultra-efficient oil coalescer |
| 7326670, | Apr 10 2001 | BJ Services Company | Well service fluid and method of making and using the same |
| 7416657, | Mar 21 2006 | NexJen Technologies Ltd. | Oil water coalescing separator |
| 7789950, | Jun 15 2007 | Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC | Air dryer with oil removal filter |
| 20050026526, | |||
| 20060013735, | |||
| 20090178970, | |||
| 20100050871, | |||
| 20100096113, | |||
| 20100200512, | |||
| 20100326922, | |||
| 20110210061, | |||
| 20110229759, | |||
| 20110259796, | |||
| 20120000853, | |||
| 20120292252, | |||
| 20130056407, | |||
| DEO2013120753, | |||
| GB2283928, | |||
| WO2010022441, | |||
| WO2010151392, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Oct 22 2013 | LEBLANC, LUC STEPHANE | General Electric Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031528 | /0353 | |
| Oct 22 2013 | KULKARNI, AMBARISH JAYANT | General Electric Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031528 | /0353 | |
| Oct 23 2013 | GAO, YIFAN | General Electric Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031528 | /0353 | |
| Oct 24 2013 | GLOMSAKER, TERJE | General Electric Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031528 | /0353 | |
| Oct 24 2013 | BAHADUR, VAIBHAV | General Electric Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031528 | /0353 | |
| Oct 28 2013 | SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, SHYAM | General Electric Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031528 | /0353 | |
| Oct 28 2013 | SITTNER, OSCAR MAX | General Electric Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 031528 | /0353 | |
| Oct 31 2013 | General Electric Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Jan 26 2017 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Jul 21 2020 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Oct 14 2024 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Feb 21 2020 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 21 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 21 2021 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Feb 21 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Feb 21 2024 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 21 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 21 2025 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Feb 21 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Feb 21 2028 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 21 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 21 2029 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Feb 21 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |