The security substrate includes an at least partially light transmitting carrier supporting a security feature and includes at least first and second layers, at least one of which covers an area which is less than a full surface area of the carrier and which at least partially overlaps the other layer. The layers have substantially the same color and texture, and the reflective contrast ratio of the overlapping areas and the non-over lapping areas is less than 20% and the transmissive contrast ratio of the overlapping areas and the non-overlapping areas is greater than 3%.
|
1. A security substrate, said substrate comprising:
an at least partially light transmitting carrier supporting a security feature, said security feature comprising a first and a second layer and a metallic and a demetallised region at least partially superimposed with the first and second layers, at least one of said first and second layers covering an area which is less than a full surface area of the carrier and which at least partially overlaps the other layer, wherein the first and second layers have substantially the same colour and texture, and the reflective contrast ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the overlapping areas and the non-overlapping areas is less than 20% and the transmissive contrast ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the overlapping areas and the non-overlapping areas is greater than 3%, the contrast ratios of each of the areas defined by the first and second layers being selected in combination with one another such that;
when the security substrate is viewed in reflected light, the first and second layers are indiscernible from each other and have the appearance of a single homogenous area; and
when the substrate is viewed in transmitted light, the first and second layers are clearly distinguishable from each other.
3. A security substrate as claimed in
4. A security substrate as claimed in
5. A security substrate as claimed in
6. A security substrate as claimed in
7. A security substrate as claimed in
8. A security substrate as claimed in
12. A security substrate as claimed in
13. A security substrate as claimed in
15. A security substrate as claimed in
16. A security substrate as claimed in
17. A security substrate as claimed in
18. A security substrate as claimed in
22. A security article as claimed in
23. A security article as claimed in
24. A security article as claimed in
|
This application is the United States National Phase of PCT Patent Application No. GB2010/001033filed on May 24, 2010, which claims priority to British Patent Application No. 0909652.0 filed Jun. 4, 2009, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to improvements in security substrates incorporating a security feature which inhibits the ability of counterfeiters to produce counterfeit notes which is formed from at least two layers which are indistinguishable in reflected light but are distinguishable in transmitted light.
The increasing popularity of colour photocopiers and other imaging systems and the improving technical quality of colour photocopies has led to an increase in the counterfeiting of banknotes, passports, and identification cards etc. There is, therefore, a need to add additional authenticating or security features to existing features. Steps have already been taken to introduce optically variable features which cannot be reproduced by a photocopier into such documentation. There is also a demand to introduce features which are discernible by the general public but which are “invisible” to, or viewed differently, by a photocopier. Since a photocopying process typically involves scattering high-energy light off an original document containing the image to be copied, one solution is to incorporate one or more features into the document which have a different perception in reflected and transmitted light, one example being watermarks and enhancements thereof.
US-B-4,307,899 describes an identification card with hallmarks which are adapted to be inspected in both transmitted and incident light. This comprises a homogenous white layer printed on a transparent substrate with a layer printed thereover which has gaps in the form of indicia. A further layer is printed on top of this layer in the form of the indicia, but offset with regard to the gap. When viewed in transmitted light, the single layer printed portions appear bright, whilst in incident light they appear dark. The multilayer printed portions, on the other hand, appear dark in transmitted light and bright in incident light, thus producing a watermark like effect.
EP-A-0657297 describes a security document which uses light interference pigments in a layer printed over a transparent support, over which is printed a pattern containing a common light reflecting pigment. This provides a security feature which cannot be copied by photographic techniques. By changing the viewing conditions from transmission to reflection mode, the differently printed parts change their colours complementarily, so that the colours become inverted.
Another type of security feature which cannot be reproduced by a photocopier is one which has different perceptions at different viewing angles in reflected light, an example of which is described in EP-A-1592561. In the method described in this patent specification a motif is printed on to a substrate, over the top of which is printed a semi-transparent motif using an optically variable ink. This enables the background on which it is printed to be visible in reflected light, whilst allowing the overlying motif to be seen at varying angles. This represents a combination of three superimposed colours, being the background colour and the two colours of the optically variable ink.
It is one object of the present invention to provide an improved security substrate incorporating a security feature which is difficult to counterfeit, whilst being relatively easy to incorporate in a security document which has different appearance in reflected and transmitted light.
The invention therefore provides a security substrate comprising an at least partially light transmitting carrier supporting a security feature said security feature comprising at least first and second layers, at least one of said first and second layers covering an area which is less than a full surface area of the carrier and which at least partially overlaps the other layer, wherein the layers have substantially the same colour and texture and the reflective contrast ratio between the overlapping areas and the non-overlapping areas is less than 20% and the transmissive contrast ratio between the overlapping areas and the non-overlapping areas is greater than 3%.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring to
The security feature comprises a first layer 12, which either fully covers one surface of the carrier 11, or a smaller region of the surface of the layer carrier 11, or a plurality of smaller regions. A second layer 13 is applied so that it wholly or partially overlaps the first layer 12. Again, the second layer 13 may be a full layer, or a partial layer covering a smaller region or a plurality of smaller regions. At least one of the layers 12, 13 must cover an area less than the entire surface of the carrier 11 and is preferably in the form of at least one image or indicia. In the embodiment shown in
As a further alternative, the second layer 13 may be applied to the carrier 11 first, with the first layer 12 at least partially overlapping it, as shown in
The properties of the first and second layers 12, 13 are such that, when viewed in reflected light, the first and second layers 12, 13 are substantially indiscernible with the appearance of only a single homogenous area covering the total area covered by both layers 12, 13 being visible. When the substrate 10 is viewed in transmitted light, however, layers 12, 13 are clearly distinguishable from each other and any images formed by one or both layers 12, 13 are clearly visible. This surprising effect is shown figuratively in
The first and second layers 12, 13 are preferably printed. It should be noted that the inks used in layers 12, 13 do not necessarily have to be the same ink, although it is preferred that they are the same.
In the printed embodiment of the invention, the preferred inks for use in the first and second layers 12, 13 are optically variable inks (OVIs), inks comprising mixtures of optically variable pigments and coloured pigments, metallic inks, reflective inks which satisfy the criteria set out above. The inks may be printed using any suitable method, such as screen printing, gravure and so on.
Optically variable pigments having a colour shift between two distinct colours, with the colour shift being dependent on the viewing angle, are well known. The production of these pigments, their use and their characteristic features are described in, inter-alia, U.S. Pat. Nos. B-4,434,010, B-5,059,245, B-5,084,351, B-5,135,812, B-5,171,363, B-5,571,624, EP-A-0341002, EP-A-0736073, EP-A-668329, EP-A-0741170 and EP-A-1114102. Optically variable pigments having a viewing angle dependent shift of colour are based on a stack of superposed thin-film layers with different optical characteristics. The hue, the amount of colour-shifting and the chromaticity of such thin-film structures depend inter alia on the material constituting the layers, the sequence and the number of layers, the layer thickness, as well as on the production process. Generally, optically variable pigments comprise an opaque totally reflecting layer, a dielectric layer of a low refractive index material (i.e. with an index of refraction of 1.65 or less) deposited on top of the opaque layer and a semi-transparent partially reflecting layer applied on the dielectric layer.
To achieve this surprising effect the optical transmissive and reflective properties of the first and second layers 12, 13 are carefully selected. More specifically there must be a low contrast ratio in reflected light and a high contrast ratio in transmitted light between the region where the first and second layers are superimposed and the region where there is only a single layer. The reflective contrast ratio must be less than 20% and preferably less than 10%. The transmissive contrast ratio must be greater than 3% and preferably greater than 5%. The layers 12, 13 must also have substantially the same colour and reflectivity at any particular angle of viewing in reflected light, and they preferably also have substantially the same texture.
A suitable method for measuring the contrast ratio of the layers 12, 13 is based on the measurement of Luminosity (L) using an Epson Perfection 2540 Photo scanner. The scanner is used to produce digital images that are seen in a manner equivalent to that of the eye. Scans of the feature are carried out in both reflective and transmissive modes. The luminosity of the images from both layer 12 and the combined layers 12 and 13 in the two scanning modes are then measured using software such as Adobe Photoshop supplied by Adobe Systems Inc. The value of luminosity has a scale of 0 (Black) to 256 (White).
The values of luminosity obtained in the reflective mode can be used to obtain a measure of reflectivity and those obtained in transmissive mode to obtain a measure of transmittance. The following data is recorded:
Ltb=transmission luminosity of layer 13
Ltd=transmission luminosity over superimposed layer 12 and 13
Lrb=reflection luminosity of layer 13
Lrd=reflection luminosity over superimposed layers 12 and 13
The transmissivity and reflectivity is then calculated using the following formulae.
Transmissivity of the background layer 13: —
Tb=(256−Ltb)/256
Transmissivity of superimposed layers 12 and 13: —
Td=(256−Ltd)/256
Reflectivity of the background layer 13: —
Rb=Lrb/256
Reflectivity of superimposed layers 12 and 13: —
Rd=Lrd/256
The contrast ratio, which is a measure of the perceived difference between the background (non-superimposed layers either 12 or 13) and the image area (superimposed layers 12 and 13) in the two viewing modes, can then be calculated as follows:
Reflection contrast ratio (the modulus value is used): —
Cr=(Rb−Rd)/(Rb+Rb)*2
Transmission contrast ratio: —
Ct=(Tb−Td)/(Tb+Tb)*2
It is extremely difficult to obtain an exact correlation between the observer assessment and the measured contrast values because the observer is affected by variable ambient conditions and by print and design elements. However experimental work has shown that the feature does not work adequately if one of the following criteria are not met:
1) in transmission the image cannot be seen (Transmission contrast ratio too low);
2) in reflection the image is not substantially hidden (Reflection contrast ratio too high).
It has been found that the limit of the transmission contrast ratio below which the image cannot be seen is 3-5%. The upper limit of the reflectance contrast ratio above which the image is not hidden in reflection is 8-20%.
An example of a suitable working formulation of a screen ink comprising an OV pigment is:
Sicpa OVI Pigment—20 weight %
Sicpa Dual Cure Silkscreen Varnish 9Z3D50—80 weight %
An example of a suitable working formulation of a screen ink comprising a metallic pigment is:
Aluminium Powder(Debdale Metal Powders Ltd)) (particle size 19×7×2 μm)—5 weight %
Seristar SX solvent based Varnish—95 weight %
The security substrate of the present invention can be used in a variety of ways, for example partially embedded into a paper or plastic substrate from which a security document can be formed or applied to the surface of a substrate. Alternatively the security substrate itself may be formed directly into one of the following examples which include:
a) elongate security elements and tapes. There are many examples of these known in the prior art, including those described in EP-A-0059056, EP-A-086029, EP-A-1141480 and WO-A-03054297;
b) polymer security substrates (e.g. banknotes), especially those comprising an uncoated windowed region;
c) foils applied as strips or patches or the like to paper or polymer substrates or document;
d) images printed directly onto paper substrates or documents.
In one embodiment the security substrate 10 to be formed into a security element is subsequently incorporated into a paper or polymer substrate so that it is viewable from both sides of the finished substrate. Methods of incorporating security elements in such a manner are described in EP-A-1141480 and WO-A-03054297. In the method described in EP-A-1141480, one side of the security element is wholly exposed at one surface of the substrate in which it is partially embedded, and partially exposed in windows at the other surface of the substrate.
Substrates suitable for making security documents may be formed from any conventional materials, including paper and polymer. Techniques are known in the art for forming substantially transparent regions in each of these types of substrate. For example, WO-A-8300659 describes a polymer banknote formed from a transparent substrate comprising an opacifying coating on both sides of the substrate. The opacifying coating is omitted in localised regions on both sides of the substrate to form a transparent region. WO-A-0039391 describes a method of making a transparent region in a paper substrate. Other methods for forming transparent regions in paper substrates are described in EP-A-723501, EP-A-724519, WO-A-03054297 and EP-A-1398174.
In a further embodiment of the invention illustrated in
It should be noted that if the security substrate is incorporated into a further paper or polymer substrate then the layers 12 and 13 can either be applied to the security substrate before or after it has been incorporated into the further paper or polymer substrate. Alternatively one of the layers 12 or 13 can be applied before and one of the layers can be applied after it has been incorporated into the further paper or polymer substrate.
It will be further understood by those skilled in the art that the substrate of the present invention may be used in combination with existing approaches for the manufacture of security elements. Examples of suitable constructions that can be used include, but are not limited to, those described in WO-A-03061980, EP-A-0516790, WO-A-9825236, and WO-A-9928852.
In one example the security substrate 10 of the present invention further includes an opaque layer, such as a demetallised metal layer, and this is illustrated in
The first and second layers 12,13 are then applied according to the previous embodiments such that in reflected light the first and second layers 12,13 are substantially indiscernible and in transmitted light they are clearly distinguishable. In this example first layer 12 is applied as a repeating array of stars (
The opaque regions 25 can be applied in register with layers 12 and 13 and the two resultant images in transmission can be related by their content and design and also may be registered such that a composite image is generated in transmitted light from a combination of the opaque regions 25 and second layer 13. As stated previously, it is not necessary that second layer 13 is an all-over coating and can itself form a printed design. In an alternative construction one or both of the layers 12 and 13 can be applied to the opposite side of the polymeric carrier 11 to the metallic regions 25.
In yet another embodiment, the metallic regions 25 in the embodiment in
The security feature of the present invention may also be combined with additional printed regions, which may be coloured, metallic or fluorescent.
The security feature may also be combined with a machine readable feature, such as a magnetic ink, and in particular a transparent magnetic ink such as those described in GB-A-2387812 and GB-A-2387813. Alternatively a machine readable aspect may be provided by the introduction of separate machine-readable layers. In addition to magnetic materials detectable materials that react to an external stimulus include but are not limited to fluorescent, phosphorescent, infrared absorbing, thermochromic, photochromic, electrochromic, conductive and piezochromic materials.
A suitable pigment for use in printed layers 12 and 13 is a magnetic OVI pigment and this provides a further opportunity for enhancing the security feature. The use of a magnetic OVI pigment enables the creation of a further optical effect which makes use of oriented magnetic pigments to generate dynamic and three dimensional-like images. Examples of the prior art describing such features include EP-A-1674282, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,759,097, A-20040051297, A-20050106367, WO-A-2004007095, WO-A-2006069218, EP-A-1745940, and EP-A-1710756. Typically the magnetic pigments are aligned with a magnetic field after applying the pigment to a surface. Magnetic flakes dispersed in a liquid organic medium orient themselves parallel to the magnetic field lines, tilting from the original planar orientation. This tilt varies from perpendicular to the surface of a substrate to the original orientation, which includes flakes essentially parallel to the surface of the product. The planar oriented flakes reflect incident light back to the viewer, while the re-oriented flakes do not, providing the appearance of a three dimensional pattern in the coating.
WO-A-2004007095 describes the creation of a dynamic optically variable effect known as the “rolling-bar” feature. The “rolling-bar” feature provides the optical illusion of movement to images comprised of magnetically aligned pigment flakes. The flakes are aligned in an arching pattern relative to a surface of the substrate so as to create a contrasting bar across the image appearing between a first adjacent field and a second adjacent field, the contrasting bar appearing to move as the image is tilted relative to a viewing angle. The use of such kinematical images is developed further in EP-A-1674282 wherein the flakes are aligned in either a first or second arching pattern creating first and second contrasting bars which appear to move in different directions simultaneously as the image is tilted relative to a viewing angle. EP-A-1674282 also describes the creation of other rolling objects such as rolling hemispheres.
The security feature comprises at least two layers 12 and 13 but is not limited to two. It may also comprise three or more at least partially overlapping layers and to make a feature comprising more than two overlapping layers with several different materials/inks.
In another embodiment of the invention the layers 12, 13 may comprise a pigment dispersed throughout a transparent or translucent polymer film.
Whilst it is preferred that the layers 12 and 13 are printed using liquid or paste inks by processes such as gravure, lithography, screen, flexo or intaglio, they may also be formed by hot stamping or laminating or coating or some other method.
Following the incorporation of the substrate in the main substrate, the latter (which is used to form a document, such as a banknote), undergoes further standard security printing processes including one or more of the following; wet or dry lithographic printing, intaglio printing, letterpress printing, flexographic printing, screen-printing, and/or gravure printing. In a preferred example and to increase the effectiveness of the security substrate against counterfeiting the design of the security substrate should be linked to the document it is protecting by content and registration to the designs and identifying information provided on the document.
While the invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is manifest that many changes may be made in the details of construction and the arrangement of components without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure. It is understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments set forth herein for purposes of exemplification, but is limited only by the scope of the attached claims, including the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled.
Howland, Paul, Marchant, Simon Dexter, Möreke, Janina
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11087650, | Aug 30 2017 | MIMAKI ENGINEERING CO., LTD. | Multilayered printed matter and multilayer printing method |
11120711, | Aug 30 2017 | MIMAKI ENGINEERING CO., LTD. | Multilayered printed matter and multilayer printing method |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4307899, | Jan 12 1979 | GAO Gesellschaft fur Automation & Organisation mbH | Identification card with hallmarks adapted to be inspected by transmitted and incident light and a process for the production thereof |
4407525, | Oct 04 1979 | GAO GESELLSCHAFT FUR AUTOMATIONA UND ORGANISATION MBH | Identification card with hallmark for authentication by incident and transmitted light |
5449200, | Oct 19 1993 | DOMTAR, INC | Security paper with color mark |
6471248, | Aug 19 1999 | Securency Pty Ltd. | Banknotes incorporating security devices |
20080030020, | |||
EP657292, | |||
EP1592561, | |||
GB2282563, | |||
WO103944, | |||
WO2004106078, | |||
WO2005047013, | |||
WO2010139930, | |||
WO9747478, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 24 2010 | De La Rue International Limited | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 08 2010 | MOEREKE, JANINA | De La Rue International Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027337 | /0641 | |
Jul 02 2010 | MARCHANT, SIMON DEXTER | De La Rue International Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027337 | /0641 | |
Jul 19 2010 | HOWLAND, PAUL | De La Rue International Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027337 | /0641 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 12 2020 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Mar 29 2021 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 21 2020 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 21 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 21 2021 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 21 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 21 2024 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 21 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 21 2025 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 21 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 21 2028 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 21 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 21 2029 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 21 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |