MEMS switches and methods of manufacturing MEMS switches is provided. The MEMS switch having at least two cantilevered electrodes having ends which overlap and which are structured and operable to contact one another upon an application of a voltage by at least one fixed electrode.
|
1. A method of forming a switch, comprising:
depositing layers of resist on a structure;
patterning the resist to form sequential openings;
sequentially depositing metal or metal alloy within the sequential openings until at least two cantilever electrodes and at least one voltage applying electrode are formed within the layers of resist;
depositing a liner over an uppermost layer of the layers of resist;
forming openings in the liner;
etching the layers of the resist through the opening until the cantilever electrodes and the at least one voltage applying electrode are in a void; and
sealing the void with additional liner material to form a hermetically sealed dome.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
|
This application is a Division of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/670,671, filed on Mar. 25, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,287,075, which is Division of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/826,070, filed on Mar. 14, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,019,049, which claims priority to Division of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/107,118, filed on Apr. 22, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,451,077.
The invention relates to MEMS switches and methods of manufacturing MEMS switches and, more particularly, MEMS switches with reduced switching voltage and methods of manufacture.
Integrated circuit switches used in 3D and other integrated circuits can be formed from solid state structures (e.g., transistors) or passive wires (MEMS). MEMS switches are typically employed because of their almost ideal isolation, which is a critical requirement for wireless radio applications where they are used for mode switching of power amplifiers (PAs).
MEMS can be manufactured in a number of ways using a number of different tools. In general, though, the methodologies and tools are used to form small structures with dimensions in the micrometer scale. Also, many of the methodologies, i.e., technologies, employed to manufacture MEMS have been adopted from integrated circuit (IC) technology. For example, almost all MEMS are built on wafers and are realized in thin films of materials patterned by photolithographic processes. More specifically, the fabrication of MEMS use three basic building blocks: (i) deposition of thin films of material on a substrate, (ii) applying a patterned mask on top of the films by photolithographic imaging, and (iii) etching the films selectively to the mask.
Depending on the particular application and engineering criteria, MEMS structures can come in many different forms. For example, MEMS can be realized in the form of a single cantilever structure such as, for example, shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,265,492. In this cantilever application, a single cantilever arm (suspended electrode) is pulled toward a fixed electrode by application of a voltage. In known applications, the voltage required to pull the suspended electrode down to the fixed electrode by electrostatic force may be high, which has been seen to cause unwanted charging on insulator after prolonged use and eventual failure of the switch. In certain applications, the high voltage, e.g., 100 volts, is also difficult to obtain since this has to be stepped up from about 1.5 volts to about 5 volts. The minimum voltage required is called pull-in voltage, which is dependent on area of the electrode, spacing or gap between the suspended and fixed electrodes, and spring constant of the membrane or springs.
Lowering the pull-in voltage without decreasing the gap and without softening the spring is desirable, as the spring provides the restoring force and determines the switching speed. In U.S. Pat. No. 7,265,492, a pair of side parallel-plate electrostatic actuators is implemented for lowering or eliminating of the bias voltages. These additional electrostatic actuators are used to reduce or eliminate the bias voltage to be applied on the fixed signal electrode. In implementation, the fixed electrode of the side parallel-plate electrostatic actuators can be elevated above a fixed signal electrode. Thus due to a smaller gap, the pull-in voltage required to pull the suspended electrode down to the fixed electrode can be lowered. However, the MEMS shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,265,492 are not hermetically sealed, and the additional electrostatic actuators can increase fabrication costs.
Accordingly, there exists a need in the art to overcome the deficiencies and limitations described hereinabove.
In a first aspect of the invention, a structure comprises at least two cantilevered electrodes having ends which overlap and which are structured and operable to contact one another upon an application of a voltage by at least one fixed electrode.
In a second aspect of the invention, a method of fabricating a switch comprises forming at least two cantilever electrodes and at least one fixed electrode through a series of resist deposition and patterning steps.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a method of forming a switch comprises: depositing layers of resist on a structure; patterning the resist to form sequential openings; sequentially depositing metal or metal alloy within the sequential openings until at least two cantilever electrodes and at least one voltage applying electrode are formed within the layers of resist; depositing a liner over an uppermost layer of the layers of resist; forming openings in the liner; etching the layers of the resist through the opening until the cantilever electrodes and the at least one voltage applying electrode are in a void; and sealing the void with additional liner material to form a hermetically sealed dome.
The present invention is described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of exemplary embodiments of the present invention, in which:
The invention relates to MEMS switches and methods of manufacturing MEMS switches and, more particularly, MEMS switches with reduced switching voltage and methods of manufacture. In implementation, the invention includes methods and structures of several novel MEMS switches optimized for (1) switching voltage (i.e. reducing it) and (2) reliability.
The MEMS switches of the invention include at least a double cantilever arrangement hermetically sealed within a nitride type liner, for example. In operation, a gap between the electrodes is reduced, compared to conventional MEMS switches. This arrangement will reduce the minimum switching voltage required to pull the electrodes together (i.e., reduced pull-in voltage) and/or the on time of the voltage. Accordingly, unwanted charging on insulator and failure of the switch can be reduced, compared to known conventional switches. Also, in operation, the MEMS switches substantially eliminate arcing, as well as large dielectric breakdown attributable to higher switching voltages. Although the MEMS switches are shown with a nitride hermetic seal, MEMS switches fabricated using the same methodology, either without nitride hermetic seals or with other methods of hermetic seals, such as a MEMS switch inside a cavity with a bonded chip or wafer cap, are contemplated by the present invention.
More specifically,
The plurality of vias 12 are formed using conventional lithographic processes. For example, a resist is deposited on the dielectric material 10 and selective portions of the resist are exposed to form openings. In subsequent processes, the dielectric material 10 is etched using a conventional process such as, for example, reactive ion etching (RIE) to form vias. The vias are filled with known metals or metal alloys to form the vias 12. The resist can be stripped away. The vias 12 can act as conductive pads as noted in more detail below.
In
In conventional processes, the sacrificial resist layer 14 is patterned to form openings. The openings are filled with a metal such as gold; although, other metals or metal alloys are also contemplated by the invention such as AlCu, W, or Cu. Prior to the deposition of the metal, one or more refractory metals, such as Ti, TiN, Ta, TaN, Ru, etc. can be used to line the vias. In the embodiment described herein, the metal will form fixed electrodes 16a and 16b and cantilevered electrodes 18a and 18b.
In processing steps shown in
As shown in
In operation, upon the application of a positive voltage to the fixed electrode 16a, the cantilever electrode 18a will be pulled down towards the cantilever electrode 18b. Also, upon a negative voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16b, the cantilever electrode 18b will be pushed up towards the cantilever electrode 18a. At a predetermined designed voltage, the respective overlapping end portions 18a1 and 18b2 will make contact with one another, i.e., travel the distance “X”, thereby closing the switch. In the off state (0 voltage), the cantilever electrodes 18a and 18b will return to their original position, with a space “X” between the respective ends.
In one design, the voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16a is about 30 volts and the fixed electrode 16b is about −30 volts. This design voltage can be significantly lower than known conventional systems as the two cantilever arms are each designed and arranged to move a smaller distance than a single arm in a conventional system. More specifically, there can be a reduced switching voltage due to bending of both arms and the use of two voltage electrodes (e.g., 16a and 16b).
This reduced voltage is a minimum switching voltage required to pull the electrodes together (i.e., pull-in voltage). This reduced voltage can result in many advantages such as, for example, reduced on time voltage, unwanted charging on insulator and reduced failure of the switch (compared to known conventional switches). Also, in operation, the MEMS switch of
In operation, upon the application of a positive voltage to the fixed electrode 16a, the cantilever electrode 18a will be pulled down towards the cantilever electrode 18b. At a predetermined designed voltage, the respective overlapping end portions 18a1 and 18b1 will make contact with one another, i.e., travel the distance “X”, thereby closing the switch. In one design, the voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16a is about 100 volts. In the off state (0 voltage), the cantilever electrode 18a will return to its original position, with a space “X” between the respective end portions 18a1 and 18b2. In this embodiment, the cantilever electrode 18b is designed to remain stationary.
This arrangement also provides advantages such as, for example, reduced sticktion of the electrodes 18a and 18b. More specifically, as there are two cantilever arms 18a and 18b, it is theorized that that switch will stayed in the closed position, upon the application of a voltage, better than conventional MEMS switches. This will ensure that the switch will not fail.
In embodiments, the arm of the cantilever electrode 18a extends over both of the fixed electrodes 16a and 16b. Also, in the embodiment of
In operation, upon the application of a positive voltage to the fixed electrode 16a, the cantilever electrode 18a will be pulled down towards the fixed electrode 16b. Also, upon a negative voltage applied to the cantilever electrode 18b, the cantilever electrode 18a will be pushed down towards the fixed electrode 16b. At a predetermined designed voltage, the end portion 18a1 will make contact with the fixed electrode 16b, i.e., travel the distance “Y”, thereby closing the switch. In the off state (0 voltage), the cantilever electrode 18a will return to its original position, with a space “Y” between the cantilever electrode 18a and the fixed electrode 16b. In this design, the cantilever electrode 18b remains stationary, as it is fixed to the nitride liner 22.
In one design, the voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16a is about 50 volts and the voltage applied to the cantilever electrode 18b is about −50 volts. This design voltage can be significantly lower than known conventional systems as the arm of the cantilever electrode 18a is being pushed and pulled by the use of two voltage electrodes (e.g., 16a and 18b).
This reduced voltage is a minimum switching voltage required to pull the electrodes together (i.e., pull-in voltage). This reduced voltage can result in many advantages such as, for example, reduced on time voltage, unwanted charging on insulator and reduced failure of the switch (compared to known conventional switches). Also, in operation, the MEMS switch of
In operation, upon the application of a positive voltage to the fixed electrode 16b, the cantilever electrode 18b will be pulled down towards the cantilever electrode 18a. Also, upon a negative voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16a and a positive voltage applied to the cantilever electrode 18c, the cantilever electrode 18a will be pushed upwards toward the cantilever electrode 18b. At a predetermined designed voltage, the respective nub portion 18a2 and the end portion 18b1 will make contact with one another, i.e., travel the distance “X”, thereby closing the switch. In the off state (0 voltage), the cantilever electrodes 18a and 18b will return to their original position, with a space “X” between the respective ends.
In one design, the voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16b and the cantilever electrode 18c is about 30 volts. Also, the voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16a is about −30 volts. This design voltage can be significantly lower than known conventional systems as the two cantilever arms (18a and 18b) are each designed and arranged to move a smaller distance than a single arm in a conventional system. More specifically, there can be a reduced switching voltage due to bending of both arms and the use of three voltage electrodes (e.g., 16a, 16b and 18c).
This reduced voltage is a minimum switching voltage required to pull the electrodes together (i.e., pull-in voltage). This reduced voltage can result in many advantages such as, for example, reduced on time voltage, unwanted charging on insulator and reduced failure of the switch (compared to known conventional switches). Also, in operation, the MEMS switch of
In embodiments, the arm of the cantilever electrode 18a also includes a vertical extending protrusion (nub) 18a2. As in other embodiments, the cantilever electrodes 18a and 18b are about 50 microns long, 9 microns high and 20 microns long; although other dimensions are also contemplated by the invention. Also, in further embodiments, a distance “X” between the respective end portions 18a1 and 18b2 that overlap is about two microns; although, other distances are also contemplated by the invention.
In operation, upon the application of a positive voltage to the fixed electrode 16b, the cantilever electrode 18b will be pulled down towards the cantilever electrode 18a. Also, upon a negative voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16a and a positive voltage applied to the cantilever electrode 18c, the cantilever electrode 18a will be pushed upwards toward the cantilever electrode 18b. At a predetermined designed voltage, the respective nub portion 18a2 and the end portion 18b1 will make contact with one another, i.e., travel the distance “X”, thereby closing the switch. In the off state (0 voltage), the cantilever electrodes 18a and 18b will return to their original position, with a space “X” between the respective ends.
In one design, the voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16b and the cantilever electrode 18c is about 30 volts. Also, the voltage applied to the fixed electrode 16a is about −30 volts. This design voltage can be significantly lower than known conventional systems as the two cantilever arms (18a and 18b) are each designed and arranged to move a smaller distance, than a single arm in a conventional system. More specifically, there can be a reduced switching voltage due to bending of both arms and the use of three voltage electrodes (e.g., 16a, 16b and 18c).
This reduced voltage is a minimum switching voltage required to pull the electrodes together (i.e., pull-in voltage). This reduced voltage can result in many advantages such as, for example, reduced on time voltage, unwanted charging on insulator and reduced failure of the switch (compared to known conventional switches). Also, in operation, the MEMS switch of
The structures as described above are used in the fabrication of integrated circuit chips. The resulting integrated circuit chips can be distributed by the fabricator in raw wafer form (that is, as a single wafer that has multiple unpackaged chips), as a bare die, or in a packaged form. In the latter case the chip is mounted in a single chip package (such as a plastic carrier, with leads that are affixed to a motherboard or other higher level carrier) or in a multichip package (such as a ceramic carrier that has either or both surface interconnections or buried interconnections). In any case the chip is then integrated with other chips, discrete circuit elements, and/or other signal processing devices as part of either (a) an intermediate product, such as a motherboard, or (b) an end product. The end product can be any product that includes integrated circuit chips, ranging from toys and other low-end applications to advanced computer products having a display, a keyboard or other input device, and a central processor.
While the invention has been described in terms of exemplary embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modifications and in the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Stamper, Anthony K., Luce, Stephen E.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5430421, | Dec 15 1992 | ASULAB S A | Reed contactor and process of fabricating suspended tridimensional metallic microstructure |
5578976, | Jun 22 1995 | TELEDYNE SCIENTIFIC & IMAGING, LLC | Micro electromechanical RF switch |
6046659, | May 15 1998 | ADVANCED MICROMACHINES INCORPORATED | Design and fabrication of broadband surface-micromachined micro-electro-mechanical switches for microwave and millimeter-wave applications |
6054745, | Jan 04 1999 | International Business Machines Corporation | Nonvolatile memory cell using microelectromechanical device |
6127744, | Nov 23 1998 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for an improved micro-electrical mechanical switch |
6143997, | Jun 04 1999 | Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, The | Low actuation voltage microelectromechanical device and method of manufacture |
6276205, | Sep 12 1998 | Qinetiq Limited | Micro-machining |
6373007, | Apr 19 2000 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | Series and shunt mems RF switch |
6384353, | Feb 01 2000 | SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | Micro-electromechanical system device |
6410360, | Jan 26 1999 | TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED A DELAWARE CORPORATION | Laminate-based apparatus and method of fabrication |
6426687, | May 22 2001 | The Aerospace Corporation | RF MEMS switch |
6465280, | Mar 07 2001 | Analog Devices, Inc. | In-situ cap and method of fabricating same for an integrated circuit device |
6469603, | Sep 23 1999 | Arizona State University | Electronically switching latching micro-magnetic relay and method of operating same |
6570750, | Apr 19 2000 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | Shunted multiple throw MEMS RF switch |
6621390, | Feb 28 2001 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Electrostatically-actuated capacitive MEMS (micro electro mechanical system) switch |
6657324, | Apr 27 1999 | NEC Corporation | Micromachine switch and method of manufacture thereof |
6750742, | Nov 01 2002 | PENDRAGON ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH LLC | Radio frequency device using micro-electronic-mechanical system technology |
6761829, | Apr 26 2001 | PS4 LUXCO S A R L | Method for fabricating an isolated microelectromechanical system (MEMS) device using an internal void |
6768403, | Mar 12 2001 | HRL Laboratories, LLC | Torsion spring for electro-mechanical switches and a cantilever-type RF micro-electromechanical switch incorporating the torsion spring |
6798315, | Dec 04 2001 | Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research | Lateral motion MEMS Switch |
6833985, | Mar 08 2002 | MURATA MAUNFACTURING , LTD | Variable capacitance element |
6841839, | Sep 24 2002 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Microrelays and microrelay fabrication and operating methods |
6876047, | Nov 09 2001 | AAC TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD | MEMS device having a trilayered beam and related methods |
6891454, | Jul 26 2002 | Panasonic Corporation | Switch |
6894592, | May 18 2001 | Schneider Electric Industries SAS | Micromagnetic latching switch packaging |
6917268, | Dec 31 2001 | International Business Machines Corporation | Lateral microelectromechanical system switch |
6977569, | Dec 31 2001 | International Business Machines Corporation | Lateral microelectromechanical system switch |
7042319, | Aug 16 2001 | Denso Corporation | Thin film electromagnet and switching device comprising it |
7145213, | May 24 2004 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | MEMS RF switch integrated process |
7215229, | Sep 17 2003 | Schneider Electric Industries SAS | Laminated relays with multiple flexible contacts |
7250838, | Jan 08 2002 | Schneider Electric Industries SAS | Packaging of a micro-magnetic switch with a patterned permanent magnet |
7265429, | Aug 07 2002 | System and method of fabricating micro cavities | |
7280014, | Mar 13 2001 | Rochester Institute of Technology | Micro-electro-mechanical switch and a method of using and making thereof |
7299538, | Jul 18 2002 | Wispry, Inc. | Method for fabricating micro-electro-mechanical systems |
7372348, | Aug 20 2004 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | Stressed material and shape memory material MEMS devices and methods for manufacturing |
7463125, | Sep 24 2002 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.; Maxim Integrated Products, Inc | Microrelays and microrelay fabrication and operating methods |
7477884, | Apr 08 2005 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Tri-state RF switch |
7692519, | Dec 21 2007 | General Electric Company | MEMS switch with improved standoff voltage control |
7759591, | Dec 15 2005 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Pneumatic MEMS switch and method of fabricating the same |
8450625, | Sep 28 2009 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Switch device and circuit including switch device |
8736404, | Oct 01 2009 | CAVENDISH KINETICS INC | Micromechanical digital capacitor with improved RF hot switching performance and reliability |
8791778, | Apr 20 2009 | GLOBALFOUNDRIES U S INC | Vertical integrated circuit switches, design structure and methods of fabricating same |
9123493, | Jan 23 2014 | Harris Corporation | Microelectromechanical switches for steering of RF signals |
20020131228, | |||
20020158746, | |||
20030080839, | |||
20030122640, | |||
20030132823, | |||
20030151479, | |||
20030210116, | |||
20030222740, | |||
20040113727, | |||
20040207498, | |||
20050007219, | |||
20050057329, | |||
20050121298, | |||
20050168306, | |||
20060181379, | |||
20070040637, | |||
20070236307, | |||
JP10134683, | |||
JP11162309, | |||
JP54073508, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 27 2013 | LUCE, STEPHEN E | International Business Machines Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037635 | /0454 | |
Mar 12 2013 | STAMPER, ANTHONY K | International Business Machines Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037635 | /0454 | |
Feb 01 2016 | International Business Machines Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 22 2021 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 06 2021 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 01 2020 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 01 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 01 2021 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 01 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 01 2024 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 01 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 01 2025 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 01 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 01 2028 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 01 2029 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 01 2029 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 01 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |