A shaft insert (or external connecting segment) with greater flexibility than the substrate shaft allowing for a more flexible zone in an area of separation between two separated portions of the substrate shaft. The flexible connection is intended to be installed between two segments of the separated substrate shaft primarily on a golf putter with the flexible connection within 5 inches of the base of the club in total compliance with USGA (United States golf Association) Rule 2, Appendix II. 2. b. requiring any change from the continuous shaft be within 5 inches of the club base. The shaft flex connection is designed to be symmetrical around its cross section with equal flexibility and torsional displacement in all directions in compliance with USGA Rule 2, Appendix 2. c. requiring golf shafts to be equally flexible with equal torsional displacement in all directions. The preferred embodiment of the invention utilizes a flexible tube for which the outside diameter is slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the substrate shaft. The substrate shaft is separated at the top of the hosel of the club and joined by fixing the tube (with epoxy or other adhesive) in each section of the separated sections of the substrate shaft whereby the separation is maintained at a fixed distance by installing an O ring or other spacer over the insert tube and between the two segments of the substrate shaft.
|
1. A golf club comprising:
A golf club head with a cylindrical insertion hole;
a lower tubular shaft inserted into a distal end of said golf club head insertion hole and terminating flush with a top of said golf club head insertion hole whereby said lower tubular shaft is secured to said golf club head with adhesive;
an upper tubular shaft with inside diameter and outside diameter corresponding to said lower shaft inside diameter and outside diameter;
an flexible cylindrical insert with outside diameter essentially corresponding to the inside diameter of said upper tubular shaft and corresponding to the inside diameter of said lower tubular shaft inserted into a distal end of the upper tubular shaft and inserted into a distal end of said lower tubular shaft whereby said cylindrical insert is secured to said lower tubular shaft with adhesive and secured to said upper tubular shaft with adhesive;
an flexible ring with inside diameter essentially corresponding with the outside diameter of said flexible cylindrical insert and outside diameter essentially corresponding with outside diameter of said lower shaft and said upper shaft whereby said flexible ring is place over the flexible cylindrical insert such that it is between the upper and lower tubular shafts and is in contact with said upper tubular shaft.
2. A golf club in accordance with
|
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to golf club shafts and golf club needs particularly as applied to putters. In particular this invention allows the face of the putter to decrease in loft (moving more to a vertical face) upon impact with the golf ball more efficiently imparting roll to the golf ball.
2. Discussion of Related Art
One of the most important parts of a golfer's game is accurate putting thus minimizing the number of strokes needed to complete a round. For example on a par 4 hole a typical stroke rating is two strokes to reach the green and two putts to get the ball into the hole thus 50% of the strokes that a golfer is rated to take is in putting. Par 5 holes usually rate 3 strokes of driver and fairway play with two putts to get the ball into the hole and par 3 holes rate one T shot and two putting strokes to complete the hole. On average the are an equal number of par 3 and par 5 holes on a golf course with the balance made up of par 4 holes again with the rating versus par 50% of the strokes that a golfer would apply in a round are putts.
Given the importance of accurate putting, great attention has been paid to putter design to accommodate and enhance a golfer's ability to accurately putt. Since there are quite a number of approaches to accurate putting, sanctioning bodies such as the USGA and Royal and Ancient have allowed great latitude in putter design and configuration well beyond that of clubs designed for driving and fairway play. Wide variations club head size and shape, shaft length, and grip size and shape are all within the major sanctioning bodies' rules of putter design.
One issue that has affected putting accuracy is the tendency of the ball to become airborne upon being struck by the face of the putter. The ball becomes airborne (slightly) due primarily to the need to overcome the rotational moment of inertia of the golf ball by applying an axial force at or near the equator of the ball. Since little or no tangential component of force is exerted on the ball, the ball becomes airborne due to frictional resistance between the putting surface and the ball to the applied axial force causing the ball to roil up the face of the putter when struck. While this phenomenon is desirable for fairway play with other clubs it impacts putting accuracy as the ball “skips” in the direction of the axial force as opposed to rolling along the intended line of the putt which is often a curved path since putting greens are not totally flat. This phenomenon of becoming airborne is more prevalent on longer putts where the ball is more firmly struck, imparting a higher axial force and opposite vector frictional force with significant impact on accuracy.
With the flexible connection installed in the shaft, the loft of the putter face, typically a few degrees negative (less than 10 degrees in accordance with USGA rules) from vertical, changes upon impact toward neutral or slightly positive (top of the putter face moves toward the ball). The degree of change in loft is proportional to the force of the strike. This change in loft is analogous to moving a hand from the side of the ball to the top of the ball immediately imparting roll to the ball and not allowing the ball to ride up the face of the putter becoming airborne. In physical terms a tangential, rotational force, is impacted to the ball along with an axial force providing simultaneous translation and rotation to the ball.
While shaft inserts are common in the reference patents cited, shaft inserts such as the reference U.S. Pat. No. 7,500,921 B2 all utilize shaft inserts of varying design to alter stiffness or damping properties without a space between shaft segments. In addition, none of the prior art cited are designed to permit an enhanced loft change in a putter head during the strike of the golf ball.
It is therefore a primary objective of the invention to provide a change in loft of the putter face from more negative (top of the putter face further away from the ball than the base of the putter face) to a position where the top of the putter face moves closer to the ball upon impact. This change in putter face angle is intended to more efficiently impart a tangential force in the direction of the top of the ball providing more efficient roll to the ball on the putting surface thus improving accuracy by allowing the ball to roll and not skip along the intended line of the putt.
It is another objective of the invention to provide added damping at impact provided by the added flexibility of the shaft just above its rigid connection to the putter head. The added damping of the stroke allows for a softer touch on particularly fast greens.
It is a third objective of the invention that the O ring (or other spacer) that provides for a fixed space between the two substrate shaft sections limits torsional movement (but equal left or right in accordance with Rule 2, Appendix 2. c,) between the two shaft substrate sections by increasing torsional friction in the area of separation. The spacer or multiple spacers will also fix the degree of flexibility between the shaft sections.
In accordance with the first objective of the invention, the combination of the flexible shaft insert and inherent flexibility of the O ring spacer(s) added flexibility at the point just above the fixed connection of shaft to putter head is achieved. Bending flexibility is equal in all directions as well as torsional flexibility where said bending flexibility allows for the putter face angle to change as the ball is struck imparting more efficient roll to the ball.
In accordance with the second objective of the invention the added compliance between the separated sections of the shaft provided by the insert design results in a dampened strike of the ball allowing for a softer touch on particularly fast greens.
In accordance with the third objective of the invention, the added torsional friction between the separated shaft sections provided by the O ring (and or other spacers of varying design) allows for maintained accuracy on off center strikes of the ball by limiting displacement of the putter head left or right of the intended perpendicular line of the putt.
Also, tuning of the durometer of the O ring or rings or spacers and insert stiffness used allows for optimum flexibility for a range of putting applications.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from, with the following detailed description, and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the present invention, are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many changes and modifications may be made within the scope of the present invention without departing from the intended function thereof which is to provide for a putter face change in loft during the strike of the ball, and the invention includes all such modifications.
Preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals represent like parts throughout, and in which:
1. Resumé
Pursuant to the preferred embodiment of the invention, a flexible shaft insert is composed of flexible nylon or other flexible tubing (or solid flexible shape) with an outside diameter matching or with clearance compared to the inside diameter of the substrate more rigid shaft. This insert is installed inside the shaft such that it bridges a separation between shaft portions which are separated by as little as 0.001 inch to any maximum distance that will provide the desired flexibility between the two portions of the substrate shaft. The separation in the substrate shaft is sized such that the lower portion of the shaft can be fixed inside the hosel or putter body with the separation occurring at the top of the hosel or putter body (depending on putter and shaft mounting design). At the top of the putter body or hosel, the O ring spacer (or alternate spacers) with an inside diameter matching the outside diameter of the flexible insert covering the space between the substrate shaft sections and resting on the putter body or top of the hosel. All connections are made between; insert and shaft segments, shaft and putter head or hosel, O ring or O rings and flexible insert using conventional cementing adhesive commonly used for such connections.
2. Construction and Operation of a First Preferred Embodiment and Possible Alternates
Referring now to
Although the present invention is not limited to any particular putter configuration or golf club for that matter, the exemplary club shown is a putter with raised hosel on putter stem 19. The present invention is, however equally applicable to any golf club or putter configuration and not limited to shaft design or shaft or insert material.
Turning to the insert assembly illustrated first by
As illustrated by
As illustrated by
While many alternates to the preferred embodiment of the invention are possible,
Another possible alternate to the preferred embodiment of the invention which retains the same principle of allowing added flexibility between shaft sections is shown by
The principle of the invention is not limited to adding a point of increased flexibility to the shaft. As illustrated by
Returning to
Inertial resistance of the stationary golf ball 2B results in coincidental deflection of flexible connection 13 by variable angle α.
The result of the deflection angle α caused by the resisting inertia of the golf ball and the force of the strike by putter head 18, is a coincidental deflection of the putter head along variable camber angle B.
Due to the creation of camber angle B by the added flexibility of insert 13, tangential force vector 26 is created which imparts improved roll to the golf ball 28.
In the absence of camber angle B during the strike by putter head 18, only force vector 27 exists which is resisted by the frictional force vector 32 between the golf ball 28 and the putting surface resulting in the tendency of the golf ball to become airborne thus resulting in a skipping action that reduces accuracy of the putt.
Of course, many modifications could be made to the invention as described and illustrated without departing from the spirit of the present invention. The scope of such changes will become apparent from the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11311781, | Jun 13 2017 | PARSONS XTREME GOLF, LLC | Golf club heads and methods to manufacture golf club heads |
11745068, | Jun 13 2017 | PARSONS XTREME GOLF, LLC | Golf club heads and methods to manufacture golf club heads |
11951366, | Apr 28 2014 | PARSONS XTREME GOLF, LLC | Golf club heads and methods to manufacture golf club heads |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1669836, | |||
1704544, | |||
1983069, | |||
3572709, | |||
3625513, | |||
4340227, | Dec 01 1980 | B P A ENTERPRISES, INC , A CORP OF MI | Golf club set and carrying case |
4984794, | May 02 1988 | TAYLOR MADE GOLF COMPANY, INC A CORPORATION OF DE | Golf club capable of selective angle modification between the shaft and head, and method of assembling the golf club |
5318300, | Oct 16 1990 | Callaway Golf Company | Metal wood golf club with variable faceplate thickness |
5362048, | Dec 06 1993 | Golf club | |
5377979, | Feb 03 1994 | ARNOLD PALMER GOLF COMPANY, THE | Backspin reducing putter |
5976031, | Oct 09 1997 | JOHNSON, JEFFREY B ; BLANTON, BARRY MICHAEL | Golf club fitting apparatus |
6033318, | Sep 28 1998 | CORNELL DRAJAN | Golf driver head construction |
6050903, | Mar 11 1996 | Golf club with improved coupling between head and shaft | |
6371865, | Mar 03 2000 | Briefcase system with golf club and method of fabrication | |
6634958, | Jan 22 1998 | DAIWA SEIKO, INC | Golf club |
6890266, | May 23 2003 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Methods and apparatus for a metal wood-type golf club |
7083529, | Nov 17 2004 | Callaway Golf Company | Golf club with interchangeable head-shaft connections |
7802373, | Aug 05 2009 | Putter shaft/head designing system | |
7976401, | Apr 14 2008 | BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO , LTD | Golf club and shaft replacing method |
8088019, | Oct 06 2009 | PLUS 2 INTERNATIONAL, INC | Adjustable driver hosel |
8529367, | Dec 14 2010 | Callaway Golf Company | Variable length golf club shaft |
8535172, | Jul 28 2011 | Cobra Golf Incorporated | Golf club with universal hosel and/or spacer |
8715103, | Mar 10 2011 | Callaway Golf Company | Adjustable golf club shaft and hosel assembly |
20030181255, | |||
20040100024, | |||
20050079923, | |||
20070173344, | |||
20080293510, | |||
20100234123, | |||
20140080617, | |||
20140213386, | |||
20140352162, | |||
20160016051, | |||
20160059093, | |||
DE1939371, | |||
SEO20075, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 05 2016 | John Thomas, Foster | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 19 2021 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 04 2021 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 29 2020 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 01 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 29 2021 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 29 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 29 2024 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 01 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 29 2025 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 29 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 29 2028 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 01 2029 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 29 2029 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 29 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |