Example methods and apparatus independently control the seating force in a rotary valve. An example apparatus includes a rotary valve having a flow control member and a dual-acting actuator operatively coupled to the rotary valve. The actuator has first and second ports to receive a pressurized control fluid to change a position of the actuator. The example apparatus further includes a valve controller operatively coupled to the actuator to control the pressurized control fluid in response to a position of the rotary valve. The example apparatus further includes a pressure limiter operatively coupled to the valve controller and fluidly coupled to the first port of the actuator. The pressure limiter is to reduce a pressure of the pressurized fluid provided to the first port of the actuator to reduce a seating force of the flow control member when the rotary valve is in a closed position.
|
15. An apparatus, comprising:
a rotary valve having a flow control member:
an actuator means to receive a pressurized control fluid to change a position of the flow control member;
a valve control means to control the pressurized control fluid in response to a position of the flow control member; and
a pressure reducing means to reduce a seating force of the flow control member when the rotary valve is in a closed position; and
wherein the seating force of the flow control member when the rotary valve is in a closed position is less that an opening force of the flow control member when the rotary valve is in an open position.
10. An apparatus, comprising:
a rotary valve having a flow control member:
a dual-acting actuator operatively coupled to the rotary valve, the dual-acting actuator having first and second ports to receive a pressurized control fluid to change a position of the dual-acting actuator; and
a valve controller operatively coupled to the dual-acting actuator to control the pressurized control fluid in response to a position of the rotary valve, the valve controller including a pressure limiter fluidly coupled to the first port to reduce a pressure of the pressurized fluid provided to the first port to reduce a seating force of the flow control member when the rotary valve is in a closed position; and
wherein a pressure of the pressurized fluid provided to the second port provides an opening force of the flow control member, the opening force being greater than the seating force.
1. An apparatus, comprising:
a rotary valve having a flow control member;
a dual-acting actuator operatively coupled to the rotary valve, the dual-acting actuator having first and second ports to receive a pressurized control fluid to change a position of the dual-acting actuator;
a valve controller operatively coupled to the dual-acting actuator to control the pressurized control fluid in response to a position of the rotary valve; and
a pressure limiter operatively coupled to the valve controller and fluidly coupled to the first port to reduce a pressure of the pressurized fluid provided to the first port to reduce a seating force of the flow control member when the rotary valve is in a closed position; and
wherein a pressure of the pressurized fluid provided to the second port provides an opening force of the flow control member, the opening force being greater than the seating force.
2. The apparatus as defined in
3. The apparatus as defined in
6. The apparatus as defined in
8. The apparatus as defined in
11. The apparatus as defined in
12. The apparatus as defined in
13. The apparatus as defined in
16. The apparatus as defined in
17. The apparatus as defined in
|
This disclosure relates generally to rotary valves and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for independently controlling seating forces in rotary valves.
Conventional control valve applications implementing a valve controller and a dual-acting actuator provide maximum actuator forces or loads that are generally uniform with respect to the opening and closing of a valve that is operatively coupled to the actuator. In valve applications that require a greater breakout torque, force or load to open the valve relative to the seating torque, force or load required to close the valve, the application of uniform opening and closing forces by a dual-acting actuator may create an excessive seating force in the valve. Excessive seating forces may result in premature wear of and/or damage to the valve components, which may adversely impact the ability of the valve to maintain an effective seal upon closing.
Example methods and apparatus for independently controlling the seating torque, force or load in a rotary valve are described. An example apparatus includes a rotary valve having a flow control member. The example apparatus further includes a dual-acting actuator operatively coupled to the rotary valve. The dual-acting actuator has first and second ports to receive a pressurized control fluid to change a position of the dual-acting actuator. The example apparatus further includes a valve controller operatively coupled to the dual-acting actuator to control the pressurized control fluid in response to a position of the rotary valve. The example apparatus further includes a pressure limiter operatively coupled to the valve controller and fluidly coupled to the first port of the actuator. The pressure limiter is to reduce a pressure of the pressurized fluid provided to the first port of the actuator to reduce a seating force of the flow control member when the rotary valve is in a closed position.
Certain examples are shown in the above-identified figures and described in detail below. In describing these examples, like or identical reference numbers are used to identify the same or similar elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features and certain views of the figures may be shown exaggerated in scale or in schematic for clarity and/or conciseness.
The example methods and apparatus described herein provide for independent control of the seating force applied to a rotary valve. Conventional control valve applications implementing a valve controller and a dual-acting actuator provide maximum actuator forces that are generally uniform with respect to the opening and closing of a valve that is operatively coupled to the actuator. Unlike these conventional control valve applications, the example methods and apparatus described herein provide for the seating force to be independently controlled such that the seating force applied to close the valve may be less than the breakout force applied to open the valve.
The example methods and apparatus described herein are particularly advantageous in valve applications such as, for example, a torque seated rotary valve, where a breakout torque, force or load required to open the valve may be substantially greater than a seating torque, force or load required to close the valve. By enabling the seating force to be independently controlled such that the applied seating force is less than the applied breakout force, the example methods and apparatus described herein reduce and/or prevent the application of excessive seating forces in the valve, thereby reducing and/or preventing instances of premature wear of and/or damage to the valve components. As a result, the lifespan over which the valve can maintain an effective seal upon closing is increased.
In some disclosed examples, the apparatus includes a rotary valve having a flow control member. In some disclosed examples, the rotary valve is a torque seated rotary valve. In some disclosed examples, the apparatus further includes a dual-acting actuator operatively coupled to the rotary valve. In such disclosed examples, the dual-acting actuator has first and second ports to receive a pressurized control fluid to change a position of the dual-acting actuator. In some disclosed examples, the dual-acting actuator is a pneumatic piston rotary actuator. In some disclosed examples, the apparatus further includes a valve controller operatively coupled to the dual-acting actuator to control the pressurized control fluid in response to a position of the rotary valve. In some disclosed examples, the valve controller is a digital valve controller. In some disclosed examples, the valve controller includes a relay to control a distribution of the pressurized control fluid to the first and second ports of the dual-acting actuator.
In some disclosed examples, the apparatus further includes a pressure limiter operatively coupled to the valve controller and fluidly coupled to the first port of the actuator. In such disclosed examples, the pressure limiter is to reduce a pressure of the pressurized fluid provided to the first port of the actuator to reduce a seating force of the flow control member when the rotary valve is in a closed position. In some such disclosed examples, a pressure of the pressurized fluid provided to the second port of the actuator provides an opening force of the flow control member, the opening force being greater than the seating force. In some disclosed examples, the pressure limiter is integrated within the valve controller. In some disclosed examples, the pressure limiter is electronically configurable. In some disclosed examples, the pressure limiter is a pressure regulator. In other disclosed examples, the pressure limiter is a pressure relief valve.
Before describing the details of the example methods and apparatus for independently controlling the seating force applied to a rotary valve, a description of a known control valve apparatus 100 is provided in connection with
The dual-acting actuator 104 of
The valve controller 106 of
In addition to the components described above in connection with
The position sensor 220 is operatively coupled to the position indicator 202 of the dual-acting actuator 104. The position sensor 220 measures and/or determines the position of the flow control member 108 of the rotary valve 102 and/or the position of the piston of the dual-acting actuator 104 based on the indication provided by the position indicator 202. In some examples, the operative coupling between the position sensor 220 and the position indicator 202 may take the form of a mechanical linkage connecting the position indicator 202 to the position sensor 220. In other examples, the operative coupling may be electronic. In some such other examples, the operative coupling may be implemented via a magnet array and one or more Hall effect sensors.
Data and/or information obtained from and/or provided by any of the inlet pressure sensor 214, the first outlet pressure sensor 216, the second outlet pressure sensor 218 and/or the position sensor 220 may be stored in the memory 212. The processor 210 may access such data and/or information from the memory 212, or may alternatively receive such data and/or information directly from any of the inlet pressure sensor 214, the first outlet pressure sensor 216, the second outlet pressure sensor 218 and/or the position sensor 220.
The control circuitry 204 receives an input signal 226 corresponding to a desired position and/or condition of the flow control member 108 of the rotary valve 102. For example, the input signal 226 may indicate that the flow control member 108 is to be zero percent (0%) open (i.e., closed) relative to the valve body 110 of the rotary valve 102. In response to receiving the input signal 226, the control circuitry 204, via the processor 210, determines the current pressures associated with the inlet pressure sensor 214, the first outlet pressure sensor 216, and the second outlet pressure sensor 218, and further determines the current position of the flow control member 108 based on the current position associated with the position sensor 220. Based on such data and/or information, the control circuitry 204, via the processor 210, generates a drive signal 228 corresponding to a change in position of the piston of the dual-acting actuator 104 and/or to a change in position of the flow control member 108 of the rotary valve 102 to place the flow control member 108 at the desired position indicated by the input signal 226. The drive signal 228 is a variable current that changes based on continuous feedback obtained from and/or provided by the inlet pressure sensor 214, the first outlet pressure sensor 216, the second outlet pressure sensor 218, and/or the position sensor 220.
The variable current drive signal 228 generated by the control circuitry 204 is transmitted to the I/P converter 206. The I/P convener 206 is of a conventional design implemented in commercially available valve controllers such as, for example, in a Fisher® FIELDVUE DVC6200 Series digital valve controller. In addition to receiving the drive signal 228, the I/P converter 206 also receives the pressurized control fluid 222 supplied through the inlet 118 of the valve controller 106. In response to receiving the drive signal 228 and the pressurized control fluid 222, the I/P converter 206 generates a variable pressure 230 corresponding to the variable current drive signal 228.
The variable pressure 230 generated by the I/P converter 206 is transmitted to the relay 208. The relay 208 of
In addition to receiving the variable pressure 230, the relay 208 also receives the pressurized control fluid 222 supplied through the inlet 118 of the valve controller 106. Based on the variable pressure 230 and the pressurized control fluid 222, the relay 208 controls the distribution of the pressurized control fluid 222 to the first outlet 120 of the valve controller 106 and/or the second outlet 122 of the valve controller 106. Accordingly, the pressurized control fluid 222 is respectively supplied by the relay 208 to the first and/or second outlets 120, 122 of the valve controller 106 and, in turn, to the first and/or second ports 114, 116 of the dual-acting actuator 104.
The respective pressure(s) at which the pressurized control fluid 222 is supplied to the first and/or second ports 114, 116, as controlled by the relay 208 of the valve controller 106, cause a corresponding translational movement of the piston of the dual-acting actuator 104. A force and/or load generated by the translating piston is transformed into a torque, rotational force and/or rotational load on the valve shaft 112, which causes the flow control member 108 of the rotary valve 102 to rotate relative to the valve body 110. As described above, the relative movement of the piston and/or the flow control member 108 is conveyed by the position indicator 202 of the dual-acting actuator 104 to the position sensor 220 of the valve controller 106, thus providing a continuous feedback loop that may be used to update and/or adjust the variable current drive signal 228.
In the conventional control valve apparatus 100 described above in connection with
The conventional control valve apparatus 100 described above provides maximum forces or loads that are generally uniform with respect to the opening and closing of the flow control member 108 of the rotary valve 102. In valve applications that require a greater breakout torque, force or load to open the valve relative to the seating torque, force or load required to close the valve, the uniformity at which such maximum torques, forces or loads are applied results in an excessive seating force on the flow control member 108 and/or, more generally, on the rotary valve 102. The conventional control valve apparatus 100 does not provide the ability to reduce the maximum torque, force or load applied in connection with seating and/or closing the rotary valve 102 without simultaneously reducing the maximum torque, force or load applied in connection with opening the rotary valve 102. In contrast to the known control valve apparatus 100 described above in connection with
In some examples, the setpoint of the pressure limiter 302 is manually configurable. For example, the setpoint of the pressure limiter 302 may be adjusted and/or configured by manually turning and/or manipulating a screw, knob, crank, handle or wheel (not shown), where the position of the screw, knob, crank, handle or wheel corresponds to a value of the setpoint. In other examples, the setpoint of the pressure limiter 302 is electronically configurable. For example, the setpoint of the pressure limiter 302 may be adjusted and/or configured in response to the pressure limiter 302 receiving an instruction and/or signal (not shown) corresponding to a user input that identifies, defines and/or determines a maximum pressure at which the pressurized control fluid 222 is to be provided to the first port 114 of the dual-acting actuator 104 in connection with seating and/or closing the flow control member 108 of the rotary valve 102. In such an example, the electronically-configurable pressure limiter 302 may include a current-to-pressure (I/P) converter (not shown) that associates the received electrical signal corresponding to the user input with the maximum pressure at which the pressurized control fluid 222 is to be provided to the first port 114.
Based on the configured setpoint, the pressure limiter 302 reduces, limits and/or restricts the pressure at which the pressurized control fluid 222 is provided to the first port 114 of the dual-acting actuator 104. For example, in an instance where the pressure limiter 302 is a pressure regulator, if the pressure limiter 302 is supplied with the pressurized control fluid 222 at a pressure of thirty pounds per square inch and the setpoint of the pressure limiter 302 is configured to twenty pounds per square inch, the pressure limiter 302 reduces the exit pressure of the pressurized control fluid 222 to twenty pounds per square inch. As a result, the pressurized control fluid 222 is provided to the first port 114 of the dual-acting actuator 104 at a pressure of twenty pounds per square inch. As another example, in an instance where the pressure limiter 302 is a pressure relief valve, if the pressure limiter 302 detects that the pressurized control fluid 222 is entering the pressure limiter 302 at a pressure of thirty pounds per square inch and the setpoint of the pressure limiter 302 is configured to twenty pounds per square inch, the pressure limiter 302 will vent a portion of the pressurized control fluid 222 to prevent the pressure at which the pressurized control fluid 222 exits the pressure limiter 302 from exceeding twenty pounds per square inch. As a result, the pressurized control fluid 222 is provided to the first port 114 of the dual-acting actuator 104 at a pressure of twenty pounds per square inch.
As a result of the reduction, limitation and/or restriction of the pressure provided by the pressure limiter 302, the seating force applied to the flow control member 108 of the rotary valve 102 when the flow control member 108 and/or the rotary valve 102 is in a closed position is reduced relative to the seating force that is otherwise applied by the conventional control valve apparatus 100 of
Although certain methods and apparatus have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods and apparatus fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
Kinser, Andrew John, Wyatt, Michael Allen, Jackson, Trent Frank
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2053668, | |||
2910266, | |||
3260496, | |||
3982725, | Jun 27 1974 | KEYSTONE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS CORP | Valve actuator |
4545289, | Sep 09 1983 | Adjustable rotary actuator | |
4882979, | Oct 07 1988 | Dual-piston acuator | |
4949936, | May 24 1988 | Actuator for actuating valves | |
5170693, | Apr 26 1991 | Rotary actuator device with a free floating piston | |
6173740, | Mar 02 1999 | AIR TORQUE S P A | Highly versatile fluid-actuated valve control actuator |
6354327, | Jul 31 2000 | CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT | Automatic position-control valve assembly |
6651687, | Feb 08 2002 | Taylor Innovations LLC | Pressure relief system with clutch activated valve |
7584692, | May 18 2007 | PetrolValves, LLC | Helical spline actuators |
8413486, | Nov 25 2011 | Shut-off valve testing system | |
20100083651, | |||
20150316158, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 18 2015 | KINSER, ANDREW | Fisher Controls International LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037346 | /0796 | |
Dec 18 2015 | WYATT, MICHAEL | Fisher Controls International LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037346 | /0796 | |
Dec 18 2015 | JACKSON, TRENT | Fisher Controls International LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037346 | /0796 | |
Dec 21 2015 | Fisher Controls International LLC | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Feb 18 2021 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 12 2020 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 2021 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 12 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 12 2024 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 2025 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 12 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 12 2028 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 2029 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 2029 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 12 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |