|
The ornamental design for a flower pot cover, as shown and described. |
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of our new flower pot cover design;
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;
FIG. 6 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the vertical angle of the skirt;
FIG. 7 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;
FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;
FIG. 9 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 10 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 11 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 12 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 8, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;
FIG. 13 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 8, the only difference being in the vertical angle of the skirt;
FIG. 14 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 8, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;
FIG. 15 is a perspective view of a third embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;
FIG. 16 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 17 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 18 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 19 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 15, the only difference being in the horizonal angle of the skirt;
FIG. 20 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 15, the only difference being in the vertical angle of the skirt;
FIG. 21 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 15, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;
FIG. 22 is a perspective view of a fourth embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;
FIG. 23 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 24 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 25 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 26 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 22, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;
FIG. 27 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 22, the only difference being in the vertical angle of the skirt;
FIG. 28 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 22, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;
FIG. 29 is a perspective view of a fifth embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;
FIG. 30 is a side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 31 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 32 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 33 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 29, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;
FIG. 34 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 29, the only difference being in the vertical angle of the skirt, and;
FIG. 35 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 29, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt.
The crosshatching on specific portions of the flower pot cover is indicative of varying surface effects.
The flower pot cover has no substantial thickness.
Weder, Donald E., Straeter, Joseph G.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 28 1992 | WEDER, DONALD E | Highland Supply Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 006351 | /0066 | |
Dec 28 1992 | STRAETER, JOSEPH G | Highland Supply Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 006351 | /0066 | |
Jan 05 1993 | Southpac Trust International, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |