The new variety originated as a result of a controlled cross between the strawberry plants `9A264` (unpatented variety) and `Balboa` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,130) in an ongoing breeding program, and was discovered as a seedling in a controlled breeding plot, in Ventura County, Calif. in February 1996. The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated by stolons in McArthur, Shasta County, Calif. `Canterbury` was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing in Ventura County, Calif. for three years. This propagation and testing has demonstrated that the combination of traits disclosed herein which characterize the new variety are fixed and retained true to type through successive generations of asexual reproduction.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named `Canterbury`. The variety is botanically identified as Fragaria×ananassa. The new variety is distinguished from other varieties by a number of characteristics as set forth in Tables 1-6.
The varieties which we believe to be similar to `Canterbury` from those known to us are `Coronado` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,221) and `San Miguel` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,642). There are several characteristics of the new variety that are different from, or not possessed by `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. The new variety has an upright to globose habit, very strong plant vigor, high density, obtuse shape of the terminal leaflet base, medium to dense petiole pubescence, its inflorescence positioned level with the leaves, very slight to slight difference in the shapes of the primary and secondary fruits, absent or very weak unevenness of surface, strong sweetness, and fine texture when tasted.
The accompanying photographs show typical specimens of the new variety, including fruit, foliage and flowers, in color as nearly true as it is reasonably possible to make in color illustrations of these characteristics.
FIG. 1 shows the whole plant.
FIG. 2 shows typical whole fruit.
The following detailed description of the new variety is based upon observations taken of plants and fruit grown in Ventura County, Calif., U.S.A. Observations of `Canterbury`, `Coronado` and `San Miguel` were taken in side by side comparison in 1999. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. Colors are described and the most similar color designations are provided from The Royal Horticultural Society (R.H.S.) Colour Chart.
The new variety is principally propagated by way of stolons. Although propagation by stolons is presently preferred, other known methods of propagating strawberry plants may be employed.
Information on the new variety is presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3. In the tables, the flowers described are secondary flowers except where indicated. The petal color of `Canterbury` is white which is not referenced in The R.H.S. Colour Chart. The fruit described is the secondary fruit on one year old plants. Fruit and flower measurements are an average of both primary and secondary fruit and flowers.
Table 1 provides information on the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety `Canterbury` compared with characteristics of `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. Table 2 provides additional information of the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety `Canterbury` compared with characteristics of the varieties `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. Table 3 provides reactions of the new variety to stresses as compared to the varieties `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. The average number of stamens is 29. Anthocyanin pigment on various plant origins is red to purple red in color. The average number of pedicels/peduncle is 5.6. The average diameter of a peduncle is 5.4 mm. The average length of a peduncle is 24.9 cm. The average pedicel diameter is 1.9 mm. The average length of the pedicels is 9.8 cm. The average petiole diameter is 4.1 mm. Achene color is red to yellow-green (46A to 151B). The average sepal number is 11.3 and average sepal size is 1.05 cm. Typical sugar content, as measured by total soluble solids, is 9.5% to 10.5%. An abundant amount of pollen produced. Tables 4 and 5 provide information of the new variety's reaction to pests and diseases, respectively, compared to the varieties `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. Table 6 provides isozyme characteristics of the new variety as compared to the varieties `Coronado` and `San Miguel`.
TABLE 1 |
|
DETAILED COMPARISON OF `CANTERBURY`, `CORONADO`, |
AND `SAN MIGUEL` |
|
|
|
San |
|
Canterbury |
Coronado |
Miguel |
|
|
Plant Characteristics |
|
|
|
Height of Plant (cm) |
30.2 |
39.8 |
30.3 |
Spread of Plant (cm) |
43.6 |
42.2 |
37.2 |
Number of Crowns |
4.9 |
4.5 |
3.1 |
Leaf Characteristics |
Terminal Leaflet Width |
9.1 |
7.7 |
7.9 |
(cm) |
Terminal Leaflet Length |
8.8 |
8.5 |
7.3 |
(cm) |
Terminal Leaflet |
0.97 |
1.1 |
0.93 |
Length/Width Ratio |
Number of Teeth/Terminal |
24.7 |
20.1 |
22.7 |
Leaflet |
Petiole Length (cm) |
16.7 |
22.0 |
22.6 |
Bract Frequency |
0% |
10% |
10% |
|
Typically |
Typically |
Typically |
|
Single |
single |
Single |
Stipule Length (cm) |
3.3 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
Stipule Width (cm) |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
Flower Characteristics |
Petal Width (cm) |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
Petal Length (cm) |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
Petal Length/Width Ratio |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.98 |
Flower Diameter (cm) |
3.7 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
Calyx Diameter (cm) |
4.6 |
6.0 |
4.9 |
Fruit Characteristics |
Fruit Width (cm) |
4.2 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
Fruit Length (cm) |
4.8 |
4.8 |
5.1 |
Fruit Length/Width Ratio |
1.14 |
1.09 |
1.16 |
Average Berry Size (g) |
20.7 |
23.8 |
25.3 |
Fruit Skin Color |
Orange red |
Dark red |
Dark red |
|
46A |
46A |
46A |
Fruit Flesh Color |
Red |
Orange |
Dark red |
|
42A |
red |
45B |
|
|
43A |
Total Yield (g/plant) |
522 |
526 |
482 |
|
TABLE 2 |
|
CHARACTERISTICS OF `CATERBURY`, `CORONADO`, |
AND `SAN MIGUEL` |
|
Canterbury |
Coronado |
San Miguel |
|
|
Plant |
|
|
|
Habit |
upright to |
flat globose |
globose to flat |
|
globose |
|
globose |
Density |
dense |
open to medium |
open |
Vigor |
very strong |
strong |
medium to |
|
|
|
strong |
Leaf |
Color of |
Green |
Dark Green |
Green |
upper side |
137A |
147A |
137A |
Color of |
Light grey |
Light grey |
Light grey |
under side |
green |
green |
green |
|
138C |
147C |
138C |
Shape in |
concave |
concave |
concave |
cross |
section |
Interveinal |
strong |
medium strong |
strong |
blistering |
Glossiness |
weak |
weak |
weak to medium |
Number of |
3 on 90% of |
3 |
3 |
leaflets |
leaves; 4 on |
|
10% of leaves |
Terminal |
flat |
flat |
revolute to |
leaflet |
|
|
flat |
margin |
profile |
Terminal |
obtuse |
obtuse to |
rounded |
leaflet |
|
rounded |
shape of |
base |
Terminal |
obtuse |
obtuse |
obtuse |
leaflet |
shape of |
teeth |
Petiole |
medium to |
medium |
medium |
pubescence |
dense |
Petiole pose |
upwards to |
upwards |
upwards to |
of hairs |
outwards |
|
outwards |
Stolon |
Number |
medium to many |
medium |
many |
Anthocyanin |
weak to medium |
strong |
strong |
coloration |
Thickness |
medium |
thin |
thin to medium |
Pubescence |
medium |
sparse |
sparse to |
|
|
|
medium |
Inflorescence |
Position |
level |
above |
above |
relative to |
foliage |
Diameter of |
same size to |
same size to |
smaller |
calyx |
larger |
larger |
relative to |
corolla |
Diameter of |
same size to |
larger |
same size to |
inner calyx |
larger |
|
larger |
relative to |
outer |
Spacing of |
overlapping |
overlapping |
touching to |
petals |
|
|
overlapping |
Fruiting Truss |
Attitude at |
erect |
semi-erect to |
prostrate |
first |
|
prostrate |
picking |
Length (cm) |
16.4 |
28.6 |
25.3 |
Fruit |
Predominant |
conical to |
conical to |
conical to |
shape |
cordate |
almost |
cordate |
|
|
cylindrical |
Difference |
very slight to |
moderate |
marked |
in shapes |
slight |
between |
primary and |
secondary |
fruits |
Band without |
absent or very |
narrow |
narrow to |
achenes |
narrow |
|
medium |
Unevenness |
absent or very |
weak to medium |
medium |
of surface |
weak |
Evenness of |
even |
even |
even |
color |
Glossiness |
medium |
strong |
medium to |
|
|
|
strong |
Insertion of |
level with |
level with |
level with |
achenes |
surface |
surface |
surface |
Insertion of |
level |
in a basin to |
set above |
calyx |
|
level |
Pose of the |
spreading to |
spreading to |
reflexed |
calyx |
reflexed |
reflexed |
segments |
Size of |
larger |
larger |
same size to |
calyx in |
|
|
larger |
relation to |
fruit |
Firmness of |
medium to firm |
firm |
medium to firm |
flesh |
Evenness of |
slightly |
slightly uneven |
slightly uneven |
flesh color |
eneven |
Distribution |
marginal and |
marginal and |
marginal and |
of flesh |
central |
central |
central |
color |
Hollow |
small to |
small to medium |
small to medium |
center size |
medium |
Sweetness |
strong |
weak |
medium |
Texture when |
fine |
fine to medium |
medium |
tasted |
Acidity |
weak |
strong |
strong |
Time of |
early |
early to medium |
early |
Flowering |
Time of |
early |
early to medium |
early |
Fruiting |
Time of |
partially |
partially |
partially |
Bearing |
everbearing |
everbearing |
everbearing |
|
|
TABLE 3 |
|
|
|
Canterbury |
Coronado |
San Miguel |
|
|
|
Reaction to |
|
|
|
Stress |
high pH |
Moderately |
Moderately |
Moderately |
|
Resistant |
Resistant |
Resistant |
high soil salt |
Moderately |
Moderately |
Moderately |
levels |
Resistant |
Resistant |
Resistant |
|
|
TABLE 4 |
|
|
|
Canterbury |
Coronado |
San Miguel |
|
|
|
|
Reaction to |
|
|
|
|
Pests |
|
Tetranychus |
susceptible |
susceptible |
susceptible |
|
urticae |
|
Aphis spp. |
susceptible |
susceptible |
susceptible |
|
Lygus hesperus |
susceptible |
susceptible |
susceptible |
|
|
|
TABLE 4 |
|
|
|
Canterbury |
Coronado |
San Miguel |
|
|
|
|
Reaction to |
|
|
|
|
Pests |
|
Tetranychus |
susceptible |
susceptible |
susceptible |
|
urticae |
|
Aphis spp. |
susceptible |
susceptible |
susceptible |
|
Lygus hesperus |
susceptible |
susceptible |
susceptible |
|
|
In addition to the morphological description above, the new cultivar `Canterbury` has been analyzed to obtain an indication of its genetic makeup to provide further means for identifying the new variety and distinguishing it from some other somewhat similar and/or related strawberry varieties. Specifically, leaf samples of `Canterbury`, `Coronado`, and `San Miguel` were analyzed by electrophoresis for isozyme patterns of the enzymes phosphoglucoisomerase (PGI), leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) and phosphoglucomutase (PGM). See J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:684-687. Isozyme characterization of the three varieties is presented in Table 4, with the letters representing the banding patterns for each enzyme as designated in the above-identified article.
TABLE 6 |
|
ISOZYME ANALYSIS FOR `CANTERBURY`, |
`CORONADO`, AND `SAN MIGUEL` |
|
Locus |
Canterbury |
Coronado |
San Miguel |
|
|
|
PGI |
A3 |
A2 |
A4 |
|
LAP |
B3 |
B3 |
B3 |
|
PGM |
C3 |
C4 |
C2 |
|
|
Amorao, Amado Q., Sjulin, Thomas M., Solis, Jr., Arnoldo
Patent |
Priority |
Assignee |
Title |
ER1136, |
|
|
|
ER1281, |
|
|
|
ER1840, |
|
|
|
ER1902, |
|
|
|
ER1967, |
|
|
|
ER2330, |
|
|
|
ER2362, |
|
|
|
ER2487, |
|
|
|
ER2617, |
|
|
|
ER2850, |
|
|
|
ER2853, |
|
|
|
ER2995, |
|
|
|
ER2996, |
|
|
|
ER313, |
|
|
|
ER3157, |
|
|
|
ER3345, |
|
|
|
ER367, |
|
|
|
ER3795, |
|
|
|
ER3852, |
|
|
|
ER3927, |
|
|
|
ER4121, |
|
|
|
ER4280, |
|
|
|
ER4296, |
|
|
|
ER4472, |
|
|
|
ER5037, |
|
|
|
ER51, |
|
|
|
ER5256, |
|
|
|
ER5406, |
|
|
|
ER5882, |
|
|
|
ER6311, |
|
|
|
ER6331, |
|
|
|
ER6770, |
|
|
|
ER6873, |
|
|
|
ER7167, |
|
|
|
ER7221, |
|
|
|
ER7256, |
|
|
|
ER7494, |
|
|
|
ER7669, |
|
|
|
ER778, |
|
|
|
ER7959, |
|
|
|
ER8, |
|
|
|
ER8071, |
|
|
|
ER8327, |
|
|
|
ER8550, |
|
|
|
ER8608, |
|
|
|
ER8655, |
|
|
|
ER8731, |
|
|
|
ER9427, |
|
|
|
ER9485, |
|
|
|
ER9635, |
|
|
|
ER964, |
|
|
|
ER9757, |
|
|
|
ER9999, |
|
|
|
PP27645, |
Mar 06 2015 |
DRISCOLL S, INC |
Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, |
Jul 15 2015 |
DRISCOLL S, INC |
Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, |
Apr 10 2015 |
DRISCOLL S, INC |
Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, |
Jul 15 2015 |
DRISCOLL S, INC |
Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, |
Mar 25 2016 |
DRISCOLL S, INC |
Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, |
Jun 06 2017 |
Driscoll's, Inc. |
Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, |
Jun 26 2017 |
Driscoll's, Inc. |
Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, |
Jun 26 2017 |
Driscoll's, Inc. |
Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, |
Jun 26 2017 |
Driscoll's Inc. |
Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, |
Jun 27 2017 |
Driscoll's, Inc. |
Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, |
Jun 27 2017 |
Driscoll's, Inc. |
Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, |
Jun 06 2017 |
Driscoll's, Inc. |
Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent |
Priority |
Assignee |
Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 12 1999 | | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | | / |
Dec 20 1999 | SJULIN, THOMAS M | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010490 | /0214 |
pdf |
Jan 06 2000 | AMORAO, AMADO Q | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010490 | /0214 |
pdf |
Jan 06 2000 | SOLIS, ARNOLDO, JR | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010490 | /0214 |
pdf |
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 |
pdf |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040607 | /0501 |
pdf |
Date |
Maintenance Fee Events |
n/a
Date |
Maintenance Schedule |
n/a