This invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named `Canterbury`. The variety is similar to the varieties `Coronada` and `San Miguel`. The variety is distinguished from `Coronado` and `San Miguel`, in particular, by its upright to globose habit, very strong plant vigor, high density, obtuse shape of the terminal leaflet base, medium to dense petiole pubescence, its inflorescence being positioned level with the leaves, very slight to slight difference in the shapes of the primary and secondary fruits, absent or very weak unevenness of surface, strong sweetness, and fine texture when tasted.

Patent
   PP12577
Priority
Oct 12 1999
Filed
Oct 12 1999
Issued
Apr 23 2002
Expiry
Oct 12 2019
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
65
0
n/a
1. A new and distinct variety of strawberry plant, substantially as shown and described.

The new variety originated as a result of a controlled cross between the strawberry plants `9A264` (unpatented variety) and `Balboa` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,130) in an ongoing breeding program, and was discovered as a seedling in a controlled breeding plot, in Ventura County, Calif. in February 1996. The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated by stolons in McArthur, Shasta County, Calif. `Canterbury` was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing in Ventura County, Calif. for three years. This propagation and testing has demonstrated that the combination of traits disclosed herein which characterize the new variety are fixed and retained true to type through successive generations of asexual reproduction.

The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named `Canterbury`. The variety is botanically identified as Fragaria×ananassa. The new variety is distinguished from other varieties by a number of characteristics as set forth in Tables 1-6.

The varieties which we believe to be similar to `Canterbury` from those known to us are `Coronado` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,221) and `San Miguel` (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,642). There are several characteristics of the new variety that are different from, or not possessed by `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. The new variety has an upright to globose habit, very strong plant vigor, high density, obtuse shape of the terminal leaflet base, medium to dense petiole pubescence, its inflorescence positioned level with the leaves, very slight to slight difference in the shapes of the primary and secondary fruits, absent or very weak unevenness of surface, strong sweetness, and fine texture when tasted.

The accompanying photographs show typical specimens of the new variety, including fruit, foliage and flowers, in color as nearly true as it is reasonably possible to make in color illustrations of these characteristics.

FIG. 1 shows the whole plant.

FIG. 2 shows typical whole fruit.

The following detailed description of the new variety is based upon observations taken of plants and fruit grown in Ventura County, Calif., U.S.A. Observations of `Canterbury`, `Coronado` and `San Miguel` were taken in side by side comparison in 1999. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. Colors are described and the most similar color designations are provided from The Royal Horticultural Society (R.H.S.) Colour Chart.

The new variety is principally propagated by way of stolons. Although propagation by stolons is presently preferred, other known methods of propagating strawberry plants may be employed.

Information on the new variety is presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3. In the tables, the flowers described are secondary flowers except where indicated. The petal color of `Canterbury` is white which is not referenced in The R.H.S. Colour Chart. The fruit described is the secondary fruit on one year old plants. Fruit and flower measurements are an average of both primary and secondary fruit and flowers.

Table 1 provides information on the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety `Canterbury` compared with characteristics of `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. Table 2 provides additional information of the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety `Canterbury` compared with characteristics of the varieties `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. Table 3 provides reactions of the new variety to stresses as compared to the varieties `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. The average number of stamens is 29. Anthocyanin pigment on various plant origins is red to purple red in color. The average number of pedicels/peduncle is 5.6. The average diameter of a peduncle is 5.4 mm. The average length of a peduncle is 24.9 cm. The average pedicel diameter is 1.9 mm. The average length of the pedicels is 9.8 cm. The average petiole diameter is 4.1 mm. Achene color is red to yellow-green (46A to 151B). The average sepal number is 11.3 and average sepal size is 1.05 cm. Typical sugar content, as measured by total soluble solids, is 9.5% to 10.5%. An abundant amount of pollen produced. Tables 4 and 5 provide information of the new variety's reaction to pests and diseases, respectively, compared to the varieties `Coronado` and `San Miguel`. Table 6 provides isozyme characteristics of the new variety as compared to the varieties `Coronado` and `San Miguel`.

TABLE 1
DETAILED COMPARISON OF `CANTERBURY`, `CORONADO`,
AND `SAN MIGUEL`
San
Canterbury Coronado Miguel
Plant Characteristics
Height of Plant (cm) 30.2 39.8 30.3
Spread of Plant (cm) 43.6 42.2 37.2
Number of Crowns 4.9 4.5 3.1
Leaf Characteristics
Terminal Leaflet Width 9.1 7.7 7.9
(cm)
Terminal Leaflet Length 8.8 8.5 7.3
(cm)
Terminal Leaflet 0.97 1.1 0.93
Length/Width Ratio
Number of Teeth/Terminal 24.7 20.1 22.7
Leaflet
Petiole Length (cm) 16.7 22.0 22.6
Bract Frequency 0% 10% 10%
Typically Typically Typically
Single single Single
Stipule Length (cm) 3.3 3.9 3.7
Stipule Width (cm) 1.1 1.3 1.0
Flower Characteristics
Petal Width (cm) 1.5 1.6 1.6
Petal Length (cm) 1.6 1.7 1.6
Petal Length/Width Ratio 0.95 0.95 0.98
Flower Diameter (cm) 3.7 4.2 4.1
Calyx Diameter (cm) 4.6 6.0 4.9
Fruit Characteristics
Fruit Width (cm) 4.2 4.4 4.4
Fruit Length (cm) 4.8 4.8 5.1
Fruit Length/Width Ratio 1.14 1.09 1.16
Average Berry Size (g) 20.7 23.8 25.3
Fruit Skin Color Orange red Dark red Dark red
46A 46A 46A
Fruit Flesh Color Red Orange Dark red
42A red 45B
43A
Total Yield (g/plant) 522 526 482
TABLE 2
CHARACTERISTICS OF `CATERBURY`, `CORONADO`,
AND `SAN MIGUEL`
Canterbury Coronado San Miguel
Plant
Habit upright to flat globose globose to flat
globose globose
Density dense open to medium open
Vigor very strong strong medium to
strong
Leaf
Color of Green Dark Green Green
upper side 137A 147A 137A
Color of Light grey Light grey Light grey
under side green green green
138C 147C 138C
Shape in concave concave concave
cross
section
Interveinal strong medium strong strong
blistering
Glossiness weak weak weak to medium
Number of 3 on 90% of 3 3
leaflets leaves; 4 on
10% of leaves
Terminal flat flat revolute to
leaflet flat
margin
profile
Terminal obtuse obtuse to rounded
leaflet rounded
shape of
base
Terminal obtuse obtuse obtuse
leaflet
shape of
teeth
Petiole medium to medium medium
pubescence dense
Petiole pose upwards to upwards upwards to
of hairs outwards outwards
Stolon
Number medium to many medium many
Anthocyanin weak to medium strong strong
coloration
Thickness medium thin thin to medium
Pubescence medium sparse sparse to
medium
Inflorescence
Position level above above
relative to
foliage
Diameter of same size to same size to smaller
calyx larger larger
relative to
corolla
Diameter of same size to larger same size to
inner calyx larger larger
relative to
outer
Spacing of overlapping overlapping touching to
petals overlapping
Fruiting Truss
Attitude at erect semi-erect to prostrate
first prostrate
picking
Length (cm) 16.4 28.6 25.3
Fruit
Predominant conical to conical to conical to
shape cordate almost cordate
cylindrical
Difference very slight to moderate marked
in shapes slight
between
primary and
secondary
fruits
Band without absent or very narrow narrow to
achenes narrow medium
Unevenness absent or very weak to medium medium
of surface weak
Evenness of even even even
color
Glossiness medium strong medium to
strong
Insertion of level with level with level with
achenes surface surface surface
Insertion of level in a basin to set above
calyx level
Pose of the spreading to spreading to reflexed
calyx reflexed reflexed
segments
Size of larger larger same size to
calyx in larger
relation to
fruit
Firmness of medium to firm firm medium to firm
flesh
Evenness of slightly slightly uneven slightly uneven
flesh color eneven
Distribution marginal and marginal and marginal and
of flesh central central central
color
Hollow small to small to medium small to medium
center size medium
Sweetness strong weak medium
Texture when fine fine to medium medium
tasted
Acidity weak strong strong
Time of early early to medium early
Flowering
Time of early early to medium early
Fruiting
Time of partially partially partially
Bearing everbearing everbearing everbearing
TABLE 3
Canterbury Coronado San Miguel
Reaction to
Stress
high pH Moderately Moderately Moderately
Resistant Resistant Resistant
high soil salt Moderately Moderately Moderately
levels Resistant Resistant Resistant
TABLE 4
Canterbury Coronado San Miguel
Reaction to
Pests
Tetranychus susceptible susceptible susceptible
urticae
Aphis spp. susceptible susceptible susceptible
Lygus hesperus susceptible susceptible susceptible
TABLE 4
Canterbury Coronado San Miguel
Reaction to
Pests
Tetranychus susceptible susceptible susceptible
urticae
Aphis spp. susceptible susceptible susceptible
Lygus hesperus susceptible susceptible susceptible

In addition to the morphological description above, the new cultivar `Canterbury` has been analyzed to obtain an indication of its genetic makeup to provide further means for identifying the new variety and distinguishing it from some other somewhat similar and/or related strawberry varieties. Specifically, leaf samples of `Canterbury`, `Coronado`, and `San Miguel` were analyzed by electrophoresis for isozyme patterns of the enzymes phosphoglucoisomerase (PGI), leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) and phosphoglucomutase (PGM). See J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:684-687. Isozyme characterization of the three varieties is presented in Table 4, with the letters representing the banding patterns for each enzyme as designated in the above-identified article.

TABLE 6
ISOZYME ANALYSIS FOR `CANTERBURY`,
`CORONADO`, AND `SAN MIGUEL`
Locus Canterbury Coronado San Miguel
PGI A3 A2 A4
LAP B3 B3 B3
PGM C3 C4 C2

Amorao, Amado Q., Sjulin, Thomas M., Solis, Jr., Arnoldo

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER1136,
ER1281,
ER1840,
ER1902,
ER1967,
ER2330,
ER2362,
ER2487,
ER2617,
ER2850,
ER2853,
ER2995,
ER2996,
ER313,
ER3157,
ER3345,
ER367,
ER3795,
ER3852,
ER3927,
ER4121,
ER4280,
ER4296,
ER4472,
ER5037,
ER51,
ER5256,
ER5406,
ER5882,
ER6311,
ER6331,
ER6770,
ER6873,
ER7167,
ER7221,
ER7256,
ER7494,
ER7669,
ER778,
ER7959,
ER8,
ER8071,
ER8327,
ER8550,
ER8608,
ER8655,
ER8731,
ER9427,
ER9485,
ER9635,
ER964,
ER9757,
ER9999,
PP27645, Mar 06 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’
PP27682, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’
PP27711, Apr 10 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’
PP27813, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’
PP29289, Mar 25 2016 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’
PP29728, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’
PP29729, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’
PP29730, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’
PP29731, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’
PP29747, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’
PP29748, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’
PP29749, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
//////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Oct 12 1999Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 20 1999SJULIN, THOMAS M Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0104900214 pdf
Jan 06 2000AMORAO, AMADO Q Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0104900214 pdf
Jan 06 2000SOLIS, ARNOLDO, JR Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0104900214 pdf
Dec 23 2010DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC ,AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST0255250237 pdf
Sep 30 2016Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncDRISCOLL S, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0406070501 pdf
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule