This invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named ‘Driscoll Malibu.’ The variety is similar to the varieties ‘Biscayne’, and ‘Madeira’. The variety is distinguished from ‘Biscayne’, and ‘Madeira’, in particular, by a flat terminal leaflet margin profile, dense petiole pubescence, 20% of plants with single bracts, a very narrow band without achenes on the fruit, and a small hollow fruit center.
|
|
Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: The variety is botanically identified as Fragaria×ananassa.
The new variety originated as a result of a controlled cross between the strawberry plants ‘Marathon’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,817) and ‘Sonora’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,386) in an ongoing breeding program, and was discovered as a seedling in Hillsborough Country, Fla. in 1998. The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated by stolons in a Shasta County, Calif. Propagules were transplanted to a controlled breeding plot in Hillsborough County, Fla., where the variety was identified and selected for further evaluation. ‘Driscoll Malibu’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing in Hillsborough Country, Fla. for three years. This propagation and testing has demonstrated that the combination of traits disclosed herein which characterize the new variety are fixed and retained true to type through successive generations of asexual reproduction.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named ‘Driscoll Malibu’. The new variety is distinguished from other varieties by a number of characteristics as set forth in Tables 1-4.
The varieties which we believe to be similar to ‘Driscoll Malibu’ from those known to us are ‘Biscayne’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,186) and ‘Madeira’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,109). There are several characteristics of the new variety that are different from, or not possessed by ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Madeira’. The new variety is distinguished from ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Madeira’ by having, for example, a flat terminal leaflet margin profile, dense petiole pubescence, 20% of plants with single bracts, a very narrow band without achenes on the fruit, and a small hollow fruit center.
The accompanying photographs show typical specimens of the new variety, including fruit, foliage, and flowers, in color as nearly true as it is reasonably possible to make in color illustrations of these characteristics.
The following detailed description of the new variety is based upon observations taken of plants and fruit grown in Hillsborough Country, Fla., U.S.A. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Observations of ‘Driscoll Malibu’, ‘Biscayne’, and ‘Madeira’ were taken in side-by-side comparison in 2002-2003. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. Colors are described and the most similar color designations are provided from The Royal Horticultural Society (R.H.S.) Colour Chart.
The new variety is principally propagated by way of stolons. Although propagation by stolons is presently preferred, other known methods of propagating strawberry plants may be employed.
Information on the new variety is presented in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4. In the tables, the flowers described are secondary flowers except where indicated. The fruit described is the secondary fruit on one-year-old plants. Fruit and flower measurements are an average of both primary and secondary fruit and flowers. Flowers of ‘Driscoll Malibu’ are fully self-fertile and typical of the species. The average size of the hollow fruit center of ‘Driscoll Malibu’ is 8.0 mm. ‘Driscoll Malibu’ differs from its maternal parent ‘Marathon’ by possessing darker red fruit and having superior shelf-life. Plants of ‘Driscoll Malibu’ are less vigorous and more compact than those of ‘Marathon.’ ‘Driscoll Malibu’ differs from its paternal parent ‘Sonora’ by being partially everbearing, while ‘Sonora’ is fully everbearing. In addition, the fruit of ‘Driscoll Malibu’ is brighter red than those of ‘Sonora.’
Table 1 provides information on the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety ‘Driscoll Malibu’ compared with characteristics of ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Madeira’. Table 2 provides additional information of the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety ‘Driscoll Malibu’ compared with characteristics of the varieties ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Madeira’. Table 3 provides reactions of the new variety to pests and diseases compared with reactions of the varieties ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Madeira’. Table 4 provides isozyme characteristics of the new variety as compared to that of the varieties ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Madeira’.
TABLE 1
QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF ‘DRISCOLL MALIBU’,
‘BISCAYNE’, AND ‘MADEIRA’
‘DRISCOLL
MALIBU’
‘BISCAYNE’
‘MADEIRA’
Plant Characteristics
Height of Plant (cm)
13.6
13.5
15.8
Spread of Plant (cm)
34.1
32.6
36.1
Number of Crowns
3.9
5.2
4.2
Leaf Characteristics
Terminal Leaflet Length
8.7
8.6
9.4
(cm)
Terminal Leaflet Width
8.8
8.8
8.4
(cm)
Terminal Leaflet Length/
0.99
0.98
1.12
Width Ratio
# Teeth/Terminal Leaflet
20.1
23.8
18.8
Color of upper side
141A
137A
147A
light to
light green
dark green
medium green
Color of under side
139C
139C
137B
light gray
light gray
light gray
green
green
green
Petiole Length (cm)
11.4
11.7
11.0
Petiole Color
144B
141D
144B
yellow-green
yellow-green
yellow-green
Bract Frequency
20%
60%
80%
typically
typically
typically
single
double
double
Stipule Length (cm)
3.8
3.5
3.2
Stipule Width (cm)
2.0
1.9
2.2
Stolon Characteristics
Anthocyanin color
58A
59B
59C
red purple
red purple
red purple
Diameter at bract (mm)
3.35
3.29
2.77
Avg. # of Daughter
46
59
59
plants/Mother (2002
Nursery)
Flower Characteristics
Petal Length (cm)
1.3
1.4
1.4
Petal Width (cm)
1.4
1.6
1.5
Petal Length/Width Ratio
0.94
0.85
0.91
Flower Diameter (cm)
3.2
3.5
3.3
Calyx Diameter (cm)
4.1
4.6
4.1
Petal Color
155C
155C
155C
white
white
white
Fruiting Truss Length
13.3
12.5
12.0
(cm)
Fruit Characteristics
Fruit Length (cm)
4.8
4.9
5.0
Fruit Width (cm)
3.8
4.1
4.3
Fruit Length/Width Ratio
1.28
1.20
1.18
Average Berry Weight
23.4
24.7
24.3
(g)
External Color
46B
46B
46A
red
red
dark red
Internal Color
48C
44A
43A
orange red
medium red
medium red
2002-2003 Yield (g/
199
143
247
plant)
TABLE 2
QUALITATIVE COMPARISON OF ‘DRISCOLL MALIBU’,
‘BISCAYNE’, AND ‘MADEIRA’
‘DRISCOLL
MALIBU’
‘BISCAYNE’
‘MADEIRA’
Plant
Habit
globose
flat globose
flat globose
Density
medium
medium
medium
Vigor
weak to
strong
strong
medium
Leaf
Shape in cross section
slightly
concave
concave
concave to
flat
Interveinal blistering
medium
weak
medium
Glossiness
weak
medium
medium
Number of leaflets
three only
three only
three only
Terminal leaflet margin
flat
revolute
revolute
profile
Terminal leaflet shape of
rounded
rounded
obtuse
base
Terminal leaflet shape of
obtuse to
rounded
rounded
teeth
rounded
Stipule pubescence
medium
medium
medium
Petiole pubescence
dense
medium
medium
Petiole pose of hairs
downwards
outwards
downwards
Stolon
Amount
medium
many
many
Anthocyanin coloration
medium to
strong
strong to
strong
very strong
Thickness
medium to
medium
medium to
thick
thick
Pubescence
medium
medium
medium
Inflorescence
Position relative to foliage
level to
level
beneath
above
Diameter of calyx relative
larger
larger
larger
to corolla on secondary
flowers
Diameter of inner calyx
larger
same size
same size
relative to outer on
secondary flowers
Spacing of petals
overlapping
overlapping
overlapping
Fruiting Truss
Attitude at first picking
prostrate
prostrate
prostrate
Fruit
Predominant shape
conical
conical
conical
Difference in shapes
slight
slight
slight
between primary and
secondary fruits
Band without achenes
very narrow
narrow
narrow
Unevenness of surface
medium
weak
weak
Evenness of color uneven
slightly
even
even
uneven
Glossiness
strong
strong
strong
Insertion of achenes
below to
level with
level with
level with
surface
surface
the surface
Insertion of calyx
level
level
level
Pose of the calyx segments
reflexed
spreading
reflexed
Size of calyx in relation to
same size to
larger
smaller
fruit on secondary fruit
larger
Adherence of calyx
strong
strong
strong
Firmness of flesh
soft to
firm
medium
medium
Evenness of flesh color
slightly
slightly uneven
slightly
uneven
uneven
Distribution of flesh color
marginal and
marginal and
marginal and
central
central
central
Hollow center size
small
large
medium
Sweetness
medium
strong
weak to
medium
Texture when tasted
medium
fine
fine
Acidity
medium
medium
weak to
medium
Time of Flowering
very early
early
very early
Harvest Interval in
late
early December
late
2002-2003
November
through late
November
through late
March
through late
March
March
Type of Bearing
partially
partially
partially
evebearing
everbearing
everbearing
TABLE 3
REACTIONS TO PESTS AND DISEASES FOR ‘DRISCOLL MALIBU’,
‘BISCAYNE’, AND ‘MADEIRA’
‘DRISCOLL
MALIBU’
‘BISCAYNE’
‘MADEIRA’
Reaction to Pests
Tetranychus urticae
susceptible
susceptible
susceptible
Lygus hesperus
susceptible
susceptible
susceptible
Reaction To Diseases
Botrytis fruit rot
susceptible
susceptible
susceptible
Powdery mildew
moderately
moderately
moderately
susceptible
susceptible
susceptible
Verticillium wilt
highly
susceptible
moderately
susceptible
susceptible
Strawberry Mottle Virus
susceptible
susceptible
partially
resistant
Xanthomonas fragariae
moderately
moderately
moderately
susceptible
susceptible
susceptible
In addition to the morphological description above, the new cultivar ‘Driscoll Malibu’ has been analyzed to obtain an indication of its genetic makeup to provide further means for identifying the new variety and distinguishing it from other somewhat similar and/or related strawberry varieties. Specifically, leaf samples of ‘Driscoll Malibu’, ‘Biscayne’, and ‘Madeira’ were analyzed by electrophoresis for isozyme patterns of the enzymes phosphoglucoisomerase (“PGI”), leucine aminopeptidase (“LAP”) and phosphoglucomutase (“PGM”). See J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:684-687. Isozyme characterization of the three varieties is presented in Table 4, with the letters representing the banding patterns for each enzyme as designated in the above-identified article.
TABLE 4
ISOZYME ANALYSIS FOR ‘DRISCOLL MALIBU’, ‘BISCAYNE’,
AND ‘MADEIRA’
‘DRISCOLL
Locus
MALIBU’
‘BISCAYNE’
‘MADEIRA’
PGI
A1
A1
A1
LAP
B3
B3
B1
PGM
C4
C4
C2
Mowrey, Bruce D., Coss, JoAnne, Gilford, Kristie L.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 02 2003 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 03 2005 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016147 | /0671 | |
Jan 03 2005 | COSS, JOANNE | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016147 | /0671 | |
Jan 06 2005 | GILFORD, KRISTIE L | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016147 | /0671 | |
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040731 | /0102 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |