This invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named ‘Driscoll Atlantis.’ The variety is similar to the varieties ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo.’ The variety is distinguished from ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo,’ in particular, by its shorter average stipule length, reduced frequency of paired bracts, shorter sepal length and width, weak leaf glosiness, dense stipule pubescence, and a very narrow band on the fruit where achenes are absent.

Patent
   PP16475
Priority
Aug 19 2004
Filed
Aug 19 2004
Issued
Apr 25 2006
Expiry
Jan 22 2025
Extension
156 days
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
65
0
n/a
1. A new and distinct variety of strawberry plant, substantially as shown and described.

1. Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: The variety is botanically identified as Fragaria×ananassa.

1.1 Variety denomination: The strawberry variety denomination is ‘Driscoll Atlantis’.

The new variety originated as a result of a controlled cross between the strawberry plants ‘88E94’ (unpatented variety) and Mirador (U.S. Plant Pat. No.: 11,279) in an ongoing breeding program, and was discovered as a seedling in Hillsborough, Fla. in 1999. The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated by stolons in a Nursery in Shasta County, Calif. Propagules were transplanted to a controlled breeding plot in Hillsborough County, Fla., where the variety was identified and selected for further evaluation. ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing in Hillsborough County, Fla. for three years. This propagation and testing has demonstrated that the combination of traits disclosed herein which characterize the new variety are fixed and retained true to type through successive generations of asexual reproduction.

The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named ‘Driscoll Atlantis.’ The variety is botanically identified as Fragaria×ananassa. The new variety is distinguished from other varieties by a number of characteristics as set forth in Tables 1-4.

The varieties which we believe to be similar to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ from those known to us are ‘Biscayne’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,186) and ‘Key Largo’ ( U.S. Plant Pat. No. 8,649). There are several characteristics of the new variety that are different from, or not possessed by ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo’. The new variety has a shorter average stipule length, a reduced frequency of paired bracts, a shorter sepal length and width, weak leaf glosiness, dense stipule pubescence, and a very narrow band on the fruit where achenes are absent.

‘Driscoll Atlantis’ is distinguished from its parents ‘88E94’ and ‘Mirador’ by being partially everbearing, in comparison to the fully everbearing trait of both parents.

The accompanying photographs show typical specimens of the new variety, including fruit, foliage and flowers, in color as nearly true as it is reasonably possible to make in color illustrations of these characteristics.

FIG. 1 shows the upper side of the leaves of the plant.

FIG. 2 shows the whole the plant.

FIG. 3 shows the under side and underside of the flowers.

FIG. 4 shows a close-up of the fruit.

FIG. 5 shows the fruit in longitudinal cross-section.

The following detailed description of the new variety is based upon observations taken of plants and fruit grown in Hillsborough County, Fla., U.S.A. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Observations of ‘Driscoll Atlantis’, ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo’ were taken in side by side comparison in the 2003-2004 winter season. Plants for observation were harvested from McArthur, Calif., and held in refrigerated storage until planting in Hillsborough County, Fla. in October 2003. Plants were grown in raised beds of soil under conditions typical of commercial strawberry production in central Florida. Fruits were harvested twice weekly for yield determination from November 2003 to March 2004. Measurements of plant, flower, and fruit characteristics were made in January 2004, approximately four months after planting. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. Colors are described and the most similar color designations are provided from The Royal Horticultural Society (R.H.S.) Colour Chart.

The new variety is principally propagated by way of stolons. Although propagation by stolons is presently preferred, other known methods of propagating strawberry plants may be employed.

Information on the new variety is presented in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4. In the tables, the flowers described are secondary flowers except where indicated. The fruit described is the secondary fruit on five month old plants. Fruit and flower measurements are an average of both primary and secondary fruit and flowers.

Table 1 provides information on the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ compared with characteristics of ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo.’ Table 2 provides additional information of the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ compared with characteristics of the varieties ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo.’ Table 3 provides reactions of the new variety to stresses, pests and diseases compared with reactions of the varieties ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo.’ Table 4 provides isozyme characteristics of the new variety as compared to that of the varieties ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo.’

TABLE 1
QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF ‘DRISCOLL ATLANTIS’,
‘BISCAYNE,’ AND ‘KEY LARGO’
‘Driscoll
Atlantis’ ‘Biscayne’ ‘Key Largo’
Plant Characteristics
Height of Plant (cm)  8.7  10.0  11.6
Spread of Plant (cm)  30.8  31.3  32.1
Number of Crowns  3.7  3.2  4.2
Leaf Characteristics
Terminal Leaflet  7.0  7.6  8.4
Length (cm)
Terminal Leaflet  7.2  8.1  8.0
Width (cm)
Terminal Leaflet  0.97  0.93  1.06
Length/Width Ratio
# Teeth/Terminal  19.0  27.0  21.6
Leaflet
Color of upper side 137A 137A 137A
medium green light green light green
Color of under side 140D 139C 139C
light gray light gray light gray
green green green
Petiole Length (cm)  10.5  9.2  11.5
Petiole Color 145C 142D 142D
yellow green yellow green yellow green
Petiolule Length (mm)  4.7  5.5  6.3
Petiolule Diameter  1.7  2.2  1.9
(mm)
Petiolule Color 145C 142D 142D
yellow green yellow green yellow green
Bract Frequency 50% 83% 0%
typically typically
paired paired
Stipule Length (cm)  2.9  3.7  3.4
Stipule Width (cm)  1.5  2.0  1.5
Stolon Characteristics
Anthocyanin color  60A  59B
red red
Diameter at bract  2.92  3.24  3.30
(mm)
Avg. # of Daughter  53  72  52
plants (2003 Nursery)
Flower Characteristics
Petal Length (cm)  1.3  1.36  1.65
Petal Width (cm)  1.3  1.49  1.46
Petal Length/Width  0.96  0.91  1.13
Ratio
Flower Diameter (cm)  2.85  2.76  2.72
Calyx Diameter (cm)  3.48  3.86  5.11
Sepal Length (mm)  12.7  15.3  21.5
Sepal Width (cm)  6.8  7.22  9.15
Petal Color 155C 155C 155C
white white white
Receptical Color 149C 150A 150A
yellow green yellow green yellow green
Anther Color  9A yellow  9A yellow  9A yellow
Fruiting Truss Length  18.2  8.7  13.6
(cm)
Fruit Characteristics
Fruit Length (cm)  5.0  4.8  4.8
Fruit Width (cm)  3.9  4.0  3.5
Fruit Length/Width  1.29  1.20  1.37
Ratio
Average Berry Weight  23.6  26.5  23.2
(g)
External Color  45B  46B  46B
red red red
Internal Color  42B  44A  44B
dark red medium red medium red
Achene Coloration 151D to 185D 180B to 150C 182B to 150A
grey red to grey red to grey red to
yellow green yellow green yellow green
Achenes per berry 121 109 104
Achene weight (g)  0.000082  0.00046  0.00058
2003-2004 Fruit Yield 327 243 251
(g/plant)

TABLE 2
QUALITATIVE COMPARISON OF ‘DRISCOLL ATLANTIS’,
‘BISCAYNE,’ AND ‘KEY LARGO’
‘Driscoll
Atlantis’ ‘Biscayne’ ‘Key Largo’
Plant
Habit flat globose flat globose globose
Canopy Density medium to medium medium
dense
Vigor medium strong medium
Leaf
Shape in cross section slightly concave slightly
concave to flat concave
Interveinal blistering medium weak weak
Glossiness weak medium medium
Number of leaflets three only three only three only
Terminal leaflet flat revolute revolute
margin profile
Terminal leaflet shape rounded rounded slightly oblique
of base
Terminal leaflet shape obtuse to rounded rounded
of teeth rounded
Stipule pubescence dense medium medium
Petiole pubescence dense medium medium
Petiole pose of hairs outwards outwards upward
Stolon
Anthocyanin weak to strong
coloration medium
Thickness medium medium
Pubescence medium medium
Inflorescence
Position relative to level to above level level to above
foliage
Diameter of calyx same size to larger much larger
relative to corolla on larger
secondary flowers
Diameter of inner same size same size smaller
calyx relative to outer
on secondary flowers
Spacing of petals overlapping overlapping overlapping
Fruiting Truss
Attitude at first prostrate prostrate semi-erect
picking
Fruit
Predominant shape conical conical conical
Difference in shapes slight slight slight
between primary and
secondary fruits
Band without achenes very narrow narrow narrow
Unevenness of surface weak to weak weak
medium
Evenness of color even even even
Glossiness strong strong strong
Insertion of achenes level with level with below surface
surface surface
Insertion of calyx level level set above
Pose of the calyx spreading to spreading reflexed
segments reflexed
Size of calyx in same to larger larger larger
relation to fruit on
secondary fruit
Adherence of calyx strong strong strong
Firmness of flesh firm firm firm
Evenness of flesh slightly uneven slightly uneven slightly uneven
color
Distribution of flesh marginal and marginal and marginal and
color central central central
Hollow center size medium large medium
Sweetness strong strong medium
Texture when tasted medium fine medium
Acidity medium medium medium
Time of First Late October Mid-November Late November
Flowering in 2003-
2004
Harvest Interval in Late November Early Late December
2003-2004 to Mid-March December to to Mid-March
Mid-March
Type of Bearing partially partially partially
everbearing everbearing everbearing

TABLE 3
REACTIONS TO STRESS PESTS AND DISEASES FOR ‘DRISCOLL
ATLANTIS’, ‘BISCAYNE,’ AND ‘KEY LARGO’
‘Driscoll
Atlantis’ ‘Biscayne’ ‘Key Largo’
Reaction to Pests
Tetranychus urticae susceptible susceptible moderately
susceptible
Lygus hesperus susceptible susceptible susceptible
Reaction To Diseases
Botrytis fruit rot susceptible susceptible susceptible
Powdery mildew susceptible moderately susceptible
susceptible
Verticillium wilt moderately susceptible susceptible
susceptible
Strawberry Mottle Virus moderately moderately moderately
resistant resistant resistant
Xanthomonas fragariae moderately moderately moderately
susceptible susceptible susceptible

In addition to the morphological description above, the new cultivar ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ has been analyzed to obtain an indication of its genetic makeup to provide further means for identifying the new variety and distinguishing it from other somewhat similar and/or related strawberry varieties. Specifically, leaf samples of ‘Driscoll Atlantis’, ‘Biscayne’ and ‘Key Largo’ were analyzed by electrophoresis for isozyme patterns of the enzymes phosphoglucoisomerase (“PGI”), leucine aminopeptidase (“LAP”) and phosphoglucomutase (“PGM”). See J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:684-687. Isozyme characterization of the three varieties is presented in Table 4, with the letters representing the banding patterns for each enzyme as designated in the above-identified article.

TABLE 4
ISOZYME ANALYSIS FOR ‘DRISCOLL ATLANTIS’,
‘BISCAYNE,’ AND ‘KEY LARGO’
‘Driscoll
Locus Atlantis’ ‘Biscayne’ ‘Key Largo’
PGI A4 A1 A1
LAP B3 B3 B3
PGM C4 C4 C4

Mowrey, Bruce D., Gilford, Kristie L.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER1136,
ER1281,
ER1840,
ER1902,
ER1967,
ER2330,
ER2362,
ER2487,
ER2617,
ER2850,
ER2853,
ER2995,
ER2996,
ER313,
ER3157,
ER3345,
ER367,
ER3795,
ER3852,
ER3927,
ER4121,
ER4280,
ER4296,
ER4472,
ER5037,
ER51,
ER5256,
ER5406,
ER5882,
ER6311,
ER6331,
ER6770,
ER6873,
ER7167,
ER7221,
ER7256,
ER7494,
ER7669,
ER778,
ER7959,
ER8,
ER8071,
ER8327,
ER8550,
ER8608,
ER8655,
ER8731,
ER9427,
ER9485,
ER9635,
ER964,
ER9757,
ER9999,
PP27645, Mar 06 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’
PP27682, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’
PP27711, Apr 10 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’
PP27813, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’
PP29289, Mar 25 2016 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’
PP29728, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’
PP29729, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’
PP29730, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’
PP29731, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’
PP29747, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’
PP29748, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’
PP29749, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Mar 10 2006MOWREY, BRUCE D Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0177630868 pdf
Mar 10 2006GILFORD, KRISTIE L Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0177630868 pdf
Dec 23 2010DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC ,AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST0255250237 pdf
Sep 30 2016Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncDRISCOLL S, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0407270261 pdf
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule