The most distinctive feature of the southern highbush blueberry, ‘Rebel’, is its combination of early fruit ripening, high yield, excellent fruit attributes especially size and scar, and its excellent plant vigor under field and high density growth conditions.

Patent
   PP18138
Priority
Dec 07 2005
Filed
Dec 07 2005
Issued
Oct 23 2007
Expiry
Dec 08 2025
Extension
1 days
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
8
0
n/a
1. A new and distinct variety of southern highbush blueberry plant, substantially as illustrated and described.

Botanical classification: Vaccinium sp. Hybrid.

Varietal denomination: ‘Rebel’.

The invention was made in part with Federal funds pursuant to the Hatch Act.

‘Rebel’ was selected in 2000 in Griffin, Ga. from open pollinated seedlings of FL 92-84 planted in Griffin in 1997. ‘Rebel’ is a hybrid containing predominantly V. corymbosum. FL 92-84, named ‘Primadonna’ by the University of Florida has not been patented to date. ‘Rebel’ differs from its female parent ‘Primadonna’ by being less upright in plant stature, and more spreading instead. Also, ‘Rebel’ leaves emerge readily during and shortly after flowering, whereas, ‘Primadonna’ tends to flower before leafing, often resulting in too few leaves to support good berry growth. ‘Rebel’ flowers 5 days after ‘Primadonna’, and ripens at a similar time. Finally, ‘Rebel’ is self-fruitful to a degree, whereas, ‘Primadonna’ is described are not being very self-fruitful. ‘Rebel’ has been tested in plantings at Alapaha and Griffin, Ga., since 2001. The selection was planted at a grower test site in 2003 in Ware County, Ga. and was planted in a high density test at Alapaha, Ga. in 2003.

‘Rebel’ has been asexually propagated on many occasions since 2000 by softwood cuttings at Griffin Ga. It roots readily from softwood cuttings and in all cases the clones propagated from cuttings have maintained the vegetative and fruit characteristics of the original selection.

‘Rebel’ has been primarily compared with the current, early southern highbush standard, ‘Star’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,675), grown under field conditions at Alapaha and Griffin, Ga. over a 3 year period.

Over the 3 year period 2003-2005, the date of 50% flowering of ‘Rebel’ was an average of 3 days earlier than ‘Star’, although this was not significantly different at the 10% probability level. The average date of 50% fruit ripening of ‘Rebel’ was significantly earlier by 8 days than ‘Star’, which has been highly acclaimed for its earliness.

Over the same period, the average berry size (7.8 vs. 7.0), berry scar (8.3 vs. 7.8), berry color (8.1 vs. 7.6) and berry firmness (7.8 vs. 7.6) for ‘Rebel’ was better than ‘Star’. All values are based on a 1 to 10 score, with 10 being the most desirable and a value of 6-7 generally considered to be the minimum acceptable rating for a commercial cultivar. The plant vigor rating of ‘Rebel’ at 7.8 was greater than that of ‘Star’ at 6.4.

The fruit yield in 2005 on plants established in 2001 at Griffin, Ga. began significantly earlier for ‘Rebel’, which had a yield of 600 g/plant compared to less than 100 g/plant for ‘Star’ on May 18th, and the final yield of 1700 g/plant was also significantly greater than ‘Star’ at 900 g/plant.

Some growers in Georgia are growing southern highbush blueberries in a high density system utilizing pine bark beds. High density plantings were established during 2003 at Alapaha and Ware County, Ga., to evaluate the performance of ‘Rebel’ compared to ‘Star’ and ‘O'Neal’ (non patented) under these conditions. ‘Rebel’ showed earlier production of fruit (210 g/plant by May 11) than ‘Star’ and ‘O'Neal’ (less than 30 g/plant), and a higher final yield (450 g/plant) than ‘Star’ (220 g/plant) and ‘O'Neal’ (390 g/plant). Over a 2 year period, 2004 and 2005, under high density planting, ‘Rebel’ flowered 3 days earlier than ‘Star’ and 8 days earlier than ‘O'Neal’, and 50% ripening was 8 days earlier than ‘Star’ and 16 days earlier than ‘O'Neal’. Under these growth conditions the berry characteristics, size, scar, color and firmness of ‘Rebel’ were similar or better than ‘Star’ and ‘O'Neal’, and the plant vigor, at a rating of 9.1 was significantly better than ‘Star’ (7.8) or ‘O'Neal’ (6.8).

‘Rebel’ is an early season southern highbush blueberry having highly favorable fruit attributes especially size and scar. It is precocious, high yielding and has excellent plant vigor. It has similar chill hour requirements to other early season Southern highbush varieties, in the range of 400 to 450 hours.

FIG. 1 shows a cluster of berries, Apr. 26, 2004.

FIG. 2 shows fruit size of ‘Rebel’ (TH642) compared to ‘Emerald’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,165), ‘Star’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,675), and ‘O'Neal’. May 11, 2005.

The following is a detailed description of the botanical and pomological characteristics of ‘Rebel’. Where dimensions, sizes, colors, and other characteristics are given, it is to be understood that such characteristics are approximations and averages set forth as accurately as practicable. Color data are presented in Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart designations. The descriptions reported herein are largely from specimen plants grown in Alapaha, Ga. and Griffin, Ga., with supplemental irrigation. Plants were 2 to 4 years old.

The cultivar has a moderate degree of self-compatibility. It should be grown with another cultivar such as ‘Star’, ‘O'Neal’, or ‘Palmetto’ (U.S. Plant patent application Ser. No. 10/909,650, issued on Jul. 4, 2006 as U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,756).

NeSmith, D. Scott

Patent Priority Assignee Title
PP22692, Jun 17 2010 University of Georgia Research Foundation Blueberry plant named ‘Southern Splendour’
PP24807, Oct 16 2012 BB IP Repository, LLC Blueberry plant named “BB05-251MI-14”
PP24808, Oct 12 2012 BB IP Repository, LLC Blueberry plant named ‘BB05-58GA-1’
PP24809, Oct 16 2012 BB IP Repository, LLC Blueberry plant named ‘BB05-274MI-139’
PP24831, Oct 12 2012 BB IP Repository, LLC Blueberry plant named “BB06-540FL-12”
PP24874, Oct 12 2012 BB IP Repository, LLC Blueberry plant named ‘BB05-61GA-61’
PP24875, Oct 12 2012 BB IP Repository, LLC Blueberry plant named ‘BB05-185GA’
PP24876, Oct 12 2012 BB IP Repository, LLC Blueberry plant named ‘BB07-210FL-18’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Dec 07 2005University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jan 03 2006NESMITH, D SCOTTUniversity of Georgia Research FoundationASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0170610077 pdf
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule