A new and distinct apple tree named ‘Dalinip’ is disclosed. The new cultivar arose as a whole tree mutation of ‘Pinova.’ ‘Dalinip’ is notable for its intense striped coloration and early maturity as compared to its parent and to other known cultivars.

Patent
   PP18482
Priority
Feb 06 2006
Filed
Feb 06 2006
Issued
Feb 12 2008
Expiry
Jun 10 2026
Extension
124 days
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
2
3
n/a
1. A new and distinct apple tree, substantially as shown and described herein.

Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: Malus pumila Mill.

Variety denomination: ‘Dalinip’.

FIG. 1 shows a tree of ‘Dalinip’ in bloom;

FIG. 2 shows a tree of ‘Dalinip’ with leaves and fruit;

FIG. 3 shows fruit and leaves of ‘Dalinip’;

FIG. 4 shows fruit of ‘Dalinip’;

FIG. 5 shows fruit of ‘Dalinip’ (on the left) as compared to fruit of parent variety ‘Pinova’; and,

FIG. 6 shows fruit of ‘Dalinip’ after starch indexing, as compared to fruit of parent variety ‘Pinova.’

‘Dalinip’ originated as a whole tree mutation of ‘Pinova’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,601). The original tree mutation was discovered during the 1998 harvest in a commercial block of ‘Pinova’ trees near Lezigne, France, planted on M9 rootstock (not patented) in 1997. The new variety was first asexually propagated by grafting in February 1999 for testing purposes at Doue La Fontaine, France under breeder's reference number MN R37 A72.

The asexually propagated progeny of ‘Dalinip’ have been found to be homogeneous and stable, retaining the unique characteristics of the original ‘Dalinip’ tree, and remaining true to type through successive generations of asexual propagation.

‘Dalinip’ is similar to its parent ‘Pinova’ in some respects, such as its ability to withstand winter and spring frosts; desirable flavor as a dessert quality fruit; very little or no russeting; no alternate bearing; and good storageability. However, ‘Dalinip’ is distinguishable from its parent by a number of features. The tree of ‘Dalinip’ is more dwarfed and compact than ‘Pinova’, and its branches are smaller than ‘Pinova.’ While similar in shape and size to the fruit of ‘Pinova’, The fruit of ‘Dalinip’ further distinguishes the new variety from its parent. A comparison of the fruit of ‘Dalinip’ and ‘Pinova’ is set forth in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1
Comparison of fruit of ‘Dalinip’
to fruit of parent ‘Pinova’
Characteristic ‘Pinova’ ‘Dalinip’
Maturity Date Third week of First week of
September September
Percentage of foreground 25% to 50% 60% to 80%
color
Pattern of foreground Mainly blush with Very prominent
color a few stripes stripes
Intensity of foreground Orange-red Very intense red with
color some orange

The following is a detailed botanical description of ‘Dalinip’, a new and distinct cultivar of Malus pumila Mill., based on observations made of the original tree from 1998 to 2003, and during the 2001 through 2005 growing seasons on specimens of second generation trees planted at Angers, France. All colors are described according to The Royal Horticultural Society Color Chart. It should be understood that the botanical and analytical characteristics described will vary somewhat depending upon cultural practices and climatic conditions, and can vary with location and season. Quantified measurements are expressed as an average of measurements taken from 2 year old trees of the variety planted on M9 rootstock. The measurements of any individual plant, or any group of plants, of the new variety may vary from the stated average.

Ligonniere, Guy Raymond

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER2523,
PP21722, Dec 16 2008 S.N.C. Elaris Apple tree named ‘Daligris’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
20060230478,
EPVR13782,
PP11601, Jan 06 1998 NURSERY LICENSING ASSOCIATION, LLC Apple tree named `Pinova`
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jan 27 2006LIGONNIERE, GUY RAYMONDSNC ElarisASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0175430565 pdf
Feb 06 2006SNC Elaris(assignment on the face of the patent)
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule