This invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named ‘Driscoll Ojai’. The variety is similar to the varieties ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice’. The variety is distinguished from ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice,’ in particular, by its height, longer petiole length, longer fruiting truss length, open canopy density and moderate susceptibility to powdery mildew.

Patent
   PP18575
Priority
Oct 04 2005
Filed
Oct 04 2005
Issued
Mar 11 2008
Expiry
Nov 05 2025
Extension
32 days
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
65
0
n/a
1. A new and distinct variety of strawberry plant, substantially as shown and described.

Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: The variety is botanically identified as Fragaria×ananassa.

Variety Denomination: The strawberry variety denomination is ‘Driscoll Ojai’.

The new variety originated as a result of a controlled cross between male cultivar ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. PP 14,005) and female cultivar ‘Driscoll Venice’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. PP 14,062) in an ongoing breeding program, and was discovered as a seedling in Ventura County, Calif. in 1999. The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated by stolons in a Nursery in Shasta County, Calif. Propagules were transplanted to a controlled breeding plot in Ventura County, Calif., where the variety was identified and selected for further evaluation. ‘Driscoll Ojai’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing in Ventura County, Calif. for four years. This propagation and testing has demonstrated that the combination of traits disclosed herein which characterize the new variety are fixed and retained true to type through successive generations of asexual reproduction.

The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of strawberry named ‘Driscoll Ojai’. The variety is botanically identified as Fragaria×ananassa. The new variety is distinguished from other varieties by a number of characteristics as set forth in Tables 1-4.

The varieties which we believe to be similar to ‘Driscoll Ojai’ from those known to us are ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. PP 14,005) and ‘Driscoll Venice’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. PP 14,062). There are several characteristics of the new variety that are different from, or not possessed by ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice’. For example, the new variety is taller, has a longer petiole length, a longer fruiting truss length, an open canopy density and is moderately susceptible to powdery mildew. Additional characteristics of ‘Driscoll Ojai’ include a strong sweetness with a seasonal average brix of 9.3. Furthermore, additional petal characteristics of ‘Dricoll Ojai’ include an orbicular petal shape, a rounded petal apex, an entire petal margin, a concavo-convex petal base and a typical and observed petal number of 5. Additional sepal characteristics of ‘Driscoll Ojai’ include an elliptic sepal shape and a typical and observed sepal number of 10. The sepal apex of ‘Driscoll Ojai’ can be either convex or complex and the sepal margin of ‘Driscoll Ojai’ can be either entire or serrate. Additional leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Ojai’ include a typical and observed rounded leaflet shape and a rounded leaf apex.

‘Driscoll Ojai’ is distinguished from its parent, ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice’ as indicated in Tables 1-4.

The accompanying photographs show typical specimens of the new variety, including fruit, foliage and flowers, in color as nearly true as it is reasonably possible to make in color illustrations of these characteristics.

FIG. 1 shows the whole the plant.

FIG. 2 shows the upper side of the leaves of the plant.

FIG. 3 shows the under side and upper side of the flowers.

FIG. 4 shows a close-up of the fruit.

FIG. 5 shows the fruit in longitudinal cross-section.

The following detailed description of the new variety is based upon observations taken of plants harvested from a nursery in Bonanza, Oreg. in September and October, 2004 and held in cold storage until planting in Ventura County, Calif. in October, 2004. Plants were grown in raised beds of soil under conditions typical of commercial strawberry production in Ventura County, Calif. Fruits were harvested twice weekly from January, 2005 to May, 2005 for yield determination. Observations of ‘Driscoll Ojai’, ‘Driscoll El Capitan’, and ‘Driscoll Venice’ were made in side by side comparison in April, 2005. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. Colors are described and the most similar color designations are provided from the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) Colour Chart.

The new variety is principally propagated by way of stolons. Although propagation by stolons is presently preferred, other known methods of propagating strawberry plants may be employed.

Information on the new variety is presented in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4. In the tables, the flowers described are secondary flowers except where indicated. The fruit described is the secondary fruit on seven months old plants. Fruit and flower measurements are an average of both primary and secondary fruit and flowers.

Table 1 provides information on the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety ‘Driscoll Ojai’ compared with characteristics of ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice’. Table 2 provides additional information of the plant and fruit characteristics of the new variety ‘Driscoll Ojai’ compared with characteristics of the varieties ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice’. Table 3 provides reactions of the new variety to stresses, pests and diseases compared with reactions of the varieties ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice’. Table 4 provides isozyme characteristics of the new variety as compared to that of the varieties ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice’.

TABLE 1
QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF ‘DRISCOLL OJAI’,
‘DRISCOLL EL CAPITAN’ AND ‘DRISCOLL VENICE’
‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll El ‘Driscoll
Ojai’ Capitan’ Venice’
Plant Characteristics
Height of Plant (cm) 22.6 20.8 18.5
Spread of Plant (cm) 32.1 31.0 31.5
Number of Crowns 4.1 4.0 3.2
Leaf Characteristics
Terminal Leaflet Length (cm) 7.4 6.7 6.3
Terminal Leaflet Width (cm) 7.0 6.0 6.5
Terminal Leaflet 1.06 1.12 0.96
Length/Width Ratio
# Teeth/Terminal Leaflet 22.0 20.0 23.7
Color of upper side 137A 147A 147A
medium dark green dark green
green
Color of under side 147D 147C 139C
light to light to light to
medium medium medium
green green green
Petiole Length (cm) 15.5 13.5 12.2
Petiole Diameter (mm) 3.0 3.1 3.5
Petiole Color 145C 149A 149A
yellow green yellow green yellow green
Petiolule Length (mm) 7.6 8.1 5.9
Petiolule Diameter (mm) 1.8 1.7 1.8
Petiolule Color 145B 149A 149A
yellow green yellow green yellow green
Bract Frequency 42% 0% 8%
typically typically
paired single
Stipule Length (cm) 3.8 3.9 3.7
Stipule Width (cm) 0.94 0.93 0.95
Stolon Characteristics
Anthocyanin color 61C 58A
purple red purple red
Diameter at bract (mm) 3.16 2.51
Avg. # of Daughter plants 62 (2003 61.8 (2002 71 (2002
Nursery) Nursery) Nursery)
Flower Characteristics
Petal Length (cm) 1.28 1.31 1.40
Petal Width (cm) 1.23 1.28 1.32
Petal Length/Width Ratio 1.04 1.02 1.06
Flower Diameter (cm) 2.35 2.37 2.6
Calyx Diameter (cm) 4.3 4.24 4.94
Sepal Length (mm) 19.6 18.6 20.9
Sepal Width (cm) 9.49 8.33 9.67
Color of Upper and Lower 155C 155C 155C
Surface of Petal white white white
Receptical Color 1A 7A 7A
yellow yellow yellow
Anther Color 12A 13A 13A
yellow yellow yellow
Fruiting Truss Length (cm) 27.9 24.8 18.2
Fruit Characteristics
Fruit Length (cm) 4.6 4.3 4.5
Fruit Width (cm) 3.7 3.3 4.2
Fruit Length/Width Ratio 1.27 1.32 1.06
Average Berry Weight (g) 26.8 26.3 30.6
External Color 46A 53A 45A
dark red dark red medium red
Internal Color 42B 43A 34A and
medium red red 155C orange
red and
white
Achene Coloration 59B to 9A 60A to 151A 60A to 15B
dark red to dark red to dark red to
yellow yellow green yellow
2003 Marketable Yield 712 661 592
(g/plant)

TABLE 2
QUALITATIVE COMPARISON OF ‘DRISCOLL OJAI’,
‘DRISCOLL EL CAPITAN’ AND ‘DRISCOLL VENICE’
‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll
Ojai’ El Capitan’ Venice’
Plant
Habit globose globose globose
Canopy Density open medium medium
dense dense
Vigor strong medium medium
Leaf
Shape in cross section concave slightly slightly
concave concave
Interveinal blistering strong strong strong
Glossiness medium strong strong
Number of leaflets three only three only three only
Terminal leaflet margin profile crenate crenate crenate
Terminal leaflet shape of base rounded rounded rounded
Terminal leaflet shape of teeth obtuse obtuse obtuse
Stipule pubescence medium sparse to medium
medium
Petiole pubescence dense dense dense
Petiole pose of hairs outwards outward to outward to
downward downward
Stolon
Anthocyanin coloration weak medium to medium
strong
Thickness medium thin medium
Pubescence weak sparse to medium to
medium dense
Inflorescence
Position relative to foliage above above level to
above
Diameter of calyx relative to larger larger larger
corolla on secondary flowers
Diameter of inner calyx relative larger smaller to smaller
to outer on secondary flowers same size
Spacing of petals touching overlapping touching to
overlapping
Fruiting Truss
Attitude at first picking prostrate prostrate prostrate
Fruit
Predominant shape almost cordate cordate
cylindrical
Difference in shapes between moderate marked slight
primary and secondary fruits
Band without achenes narrow very narrow very narrow
Unevenness of surface weak to weak to weak
medium medium
Evenness of color even slightly slightly
uneven to uneven to
even even
Glossiness strong strong medium to
strong
Insertion of achenes level with below to level with
surface level with surface
the surface
Insertion of calyx level in a basin to level to set
level above
Pose of the calyx segments spreading reflexed reflexed
to reflexed
Size of calyx in relation to fruit same size larger larger
on secondary fruit to larger
Adherence of calyx medium to strong strong
strong
Firmness of flesh firm firm medium
Evenness of flesh color slightly even uneven
uneven
Distribution of flesh color marginal marginal and only
and central marginal
central
Hollow center size medium large small to
medium
Sweetness strong strong strong
Texture when tasted fine to fine medium
medium
Acidity medium medium weak
Time of First Flowering After mid- mid- late-
Planting in 2004 December December December
Harvest Interval in 2005 late late January late January
January to to to
late-May late-May late-May
Type of Bearing partially partially partially
ever- everbearing everbearing
bearing

TABLE 3
REACTIONS TO STRESS PESTS AND DISEASES FOR
‘DRISCOLL OJAI’, ‘DRISCOLL EL CAPITAN’ AND
‘DRISCOLL VENICE’
‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll Ojai’ El Capitan’ Venice’
Reaction to Pests
Tetranychus urticae moderately moderately moderately
resistant resistant resistant
Lygus hesperus susceptible susceptible susceptible
Reaction To Diseases
Botrytis fruit rot moderately moderately moderately
susceptible susceptible susceptible
Powdery mildew moderately moderately moderately
susceptible resistant resistant
Verticillium wilt susceptible susceptible susceptible
Strawberry Mottle Virus moderately moderately moderately
resistant resistant resistant
Xanthomonas fragariae moderately moderately moderately
susceptible susceptible susceptible

In addition to the morphological description above, the new cultivar ‘Driscoll Ojai’ has been analyzed to obtain an indication of its genetic makeup to provide further means for identifying the new variety and distinguishing it from other somewhat similar and/or related strawberry varieties. Specifically, leaf samples of ‘Driscoll Ojai’. ‘Driscoll El Capitan’ and ‘Driscoll Venice’ were analyzed by electrophoresis for isozyme patterns of the enzymes phosphoglucoisomerase (“PGI”), leucine aminopeptidase (“LAP”) and phosphoglucomutase (“PGM”). See J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:684-687. Isozyme characterization of the three varieties is presented in Table 4, with the letters representing the banding patterns for each enzyme as designated in the above-identified article.

TABLE 4
ISOZYME ANALYSIS FOR ‘DRISCOLL OJAI’,
‘DRISCOLL EL CAPITAN’ AND ‘DRISCOLL VENICE’
‘Driscoll ‘Driscoll El ‘Driscoll
Locus Ojai’ Capitan’ Venice’
PGI A1 A2 A4
LAP B3 B3 B3
PGM C2 C4 C2

Ferguson, Michael, Amorao, Amado

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER1136,
ER1281,
ER1840,
ER1902,
ER1967,
ER2330,
ER2362,
ER2487,
ER2617,
ER2850,
ER2853,
ER2995,
ER2996,
ER313,
ER3157,
ER3345,
ER367,
ER3795,
ER3852,
ER3927,
ER4121,
ER4280,
ER4296,
ER4472,
ER5037,
ER51,
ER5256,
ER5406,
ER5882,
ER6311,
ER6331,
ER6770,
ER6873,
ER7167,
ER7221,
ER7256,
ER7494,
ER7669,
ER778,
ER7959,
ER8,
ER8071,
ER8327,
ER8550,
ER8608,
ER8655,
ER8731,
ER9427,
ER9485,
ER9635,
ER964,
ER9757,
ER9999,
PP27645, Mar 06 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’
PP27682, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’
PP27711, Apr 10 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’
PP27813, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’
PP29289, Mar 25 2016 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’
PP29728, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’
PP29729, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’
PP29730, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’
PP29731, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’
PP29747, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’
PP29748, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’
PP29749, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Oct 04 2005Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Mar 10 2006FERGUSON, MICHAELDriscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0174850367 pdf
Apr 04 2006AMORAO, AMADODriscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0174850367 pdf
Dec 23 2010DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC ,AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST0255250237 pdf
Sep 30 2016Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncDRISCOLL S, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0406960386 pdf
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule