This invention relates to a new and distinctive day-neutral type of strawberry designated as ‘Monterey’. ‘Monterey’ is a day-neutral (everbearing) cultivar similar to ‘Diamante’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,079) but with higher yield and better quality fruit, better disease resistance and better flavor. It is similar to ‘Albion’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,228) for fruit quality but with higher yield, and larger fruit.
|
1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant having the characteristics substantially as described and illustrated herein.
|
Genus and species: The strawberry cultivar of this invention is botanically identified as Fragaria×ananassa Duch.
Variety denomination: The variety denomination is ‘Monterey’.
This invention relates to a new and distinctive day-neutral type cultivar designated as ‘Monterey’, which resulted from a cross performed in 2001 between the cultivar ‘Albion’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,228) and advanced selection Cal 97.85-6. ‘Monterey’ was first fruited at the University of California Wolfskill Experimental Orchard, near Winters, Calif. in 2002, where it was selected, originally designated Cal 1.132-3, and propagated asexually by runners. Following selection and during testing, the plant of this selection was designated ‘CN222’ and, later for introduction into commerce, ‘Monterey’. Asexual propagules from this original source have been tested at the Watsonville Strawberry Research Facility, the South Coast Research and Extension Center, and to a limited extent in grower fields starting in 2005.
‘Monterey’ is a day-neutral (everbearing) cultivar similar to ‘Diamante’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,079) but with higher yield and better quality fruit, better disease resistance and better flavor; it is similar to ‘Albion’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,228) for fruit quality but with higher yield, and larger fruit.
The figures depict various characteristics of the ‘Monterey’ cultivar.
‘Monterey’ is typical of day-neutral strawberry cultivars and produces fruit regardless of day length when treated appropriately in arid, subtropical climates. ‘Monterey’ is moderate to weak in expressing the day-neutral character, being comparable in flowering response to ‘Diamante’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,435) and ‘Albion’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,228), and less so than ‘Fern’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,267) or ‘Irvine’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,172). The production pattern for ‘Monterey’ is similar to that for ‘Albion’. ‘Monterey’ will be of special interest for winter plantings and in summer plantings where ‘Diamante’ and ‘Albion’ have been successful.
TABLE 1
Foliar and plant characteristics for
‘Monterey’, ‘Aromas’, ‘Diamante’, and ‘Albion’.
Cultivar
Foliar
Character
‘Aromas’
‘Diamante’
‘Albion’
‘Monterey’
Plant height
(mm)
mean
272
220
223
311
range
240-300
190-240
170-290
260-380
Plant spread
(mm)
mean
323
316
295
343
range
300-360
265-385
270-315
315-395
Mid-tier
leaflet
Length (mm)
mean
79
78
70
78
range
70-90
60-90
60-80
70-100
Width (mm)
mean
74
77
68
73
range
70-80
55-90
60-80
60-100
Mid-tier leaf
Length (mm)
mean
113
99
99
111
range
100-120
80-120
90-110
100-140
Width (mm)
mean
135
134
122
140
range
120-150
90-150
105-135
120-150
Leaf
components
Petiole
length (mm)
mean
174
114
122
212
range
140-210
100-130
95-180
200-230
Petiole
diameter
(mm)
mean
4.5
5.2
4.9
5.1
range
4-6
4-7
4-6
4-6
Petiolule
length (mm)
mean
6.6
5.2
6.7
7.4
range
4.3-7.5
4.0-7.6
5.0-8.0
7-8
#
3
3
3
3
leaflets/leaf
Leaf
some flat,
some flat,
some flat,
Mostly
convexity
most slight
most slight
most slight
concave
concave
concave
concave
Serrations
number/leaf
19.9
20.2
23.3
21.4
range
16-24
16-24
21-27
19-24
shape
rounded to
rounded to
semi-pointed
semi-pointed
semi-pointed
semi-pointed
Leaf
moderate
moderate-
moderate
heavy
pubescence
heavy
Petiole
Moderate-
heavy
heavy
moderate-
pubescence
heavy
heavy
density
direction
perpen-
perpen-
perpen-
perpendicular
dicular
dicular
dicular
Petiole color
5 GY 8/8
7.5 GY 9/4
5 GY 8/8
5 GY 8/8
(Munsell)
Stipule
length (mm)
mean
34.2
31.6
32.5
34.7
range
30-39
22-36
24-37
31-38
Stipule color
core
7.5 GY 8/7
7.5 GY 8/7
5 GY 8/7
5 GY 7/10
margins
2.5 GY 9/3
5 GY 6/8
5 GY 6/8
2.5 GY 7/10
Stolon base
3.0
3.2
3.0
3.0
diameter
(mm)
Stolons per
33.0
29.0
26.9
28.6
nursery
mother plant
Venation
pinnate
pinnate
pinnate
pinnate
pattern
color
2.5 GY 5/5
10 GY 5/5
2.5 GY 6/8
10 Y 7/9
‘Monterey’ has been tested under a variety of cultural regimes, and optimal performance is obtained when nursery treatments and nutritional programs similar to those for ‘Albion’, ‘Diamante’, and ‘Aromas’ are used. In general, ‘Monterey’ is more vigorous than the comparison cultivars and is less sensitive to low chilling. ‘Monterey’ retains excellent fruit quality in summer planting systems.
When treated with appropriate planting regimes, ‘Monterey’ has larger fruit and produces greater individual-plant yield than any of the comparison cultivars (Table 5). ‘Monterey’ has a similar production pattern to ‘Albion’ with most cultural treatments, although it is substantially more adapted to early-season winter planting. Commercial appearance ratings have been similar to or better than those for all of the comparison cultivars, especially ‘Aromas’. These superior appearance scores translate directly into a larger fraction of marketable fruit than is produced by the comparison cultivars. Fruit for ‘Monterey’ is substantially firmer than fruit from ‘Aromas’, similar in firmness to the other comparison cultivars. Subjectively, ‘Monterey’ has outstanding flavor with a distinct sweet aftertaste. The fruit will be exceptional for both fresh market and processing, and will be useful for home garden purposes.
TABLE 2
Foliar and fruit color characteristics for ‘Monterey’
and three comparison cultivars.
Cultivar
Color
Character
‘Aromas’
‘Diamante’
‘Albion’
‘Monterey’
Leaf color
(CIELAB)
Adaxial
L*
mean
35.1
34.8
34.7
35.4
range
32.7-37.7
32.6-36.8
32.8-36.7
31.3-37.3
a*
mean
−10.6
−10.4
−9.8
−11.0
range
−8.2-−14.0
−8.7-−11.9
−9.4-−11.3
−9.5-−12.2
b*
mean
13.8
13.8
12.8
14.5
range
11.2-18.1
12.2-16.6
10.7-15.6
12.6-16.3
Munsell
7.5 GY 4/4
5 GY 4/3
5 GY 4/3
5 GY 4/3
Abaxial
L*
mean
52.4
51.1
50.6
49.2
range
50.6-54.1
49.7-52.2
43.7-53.1
46.7-52.4
a*
mean
−11.6
−12.8
−12.4
−12.6
range
−10.7-−13.6
−11.6-−14.9
−8.6-−11.4
−11.8-−13.2
b*
mean
17.3
19.5
17.2
18.4
range
14.3-23.2
15.3-23.5
14.5-19.6
16.4-21.8
Munsell
10 GY 7/8
7.5 GY 6/8
7.5 GY 8/7
5 GY 5/6
Fruit color
(CIELAB)
External
L*
mean
34.2
40.8
36.5
35.0
range
31.2-38.3
35.5-45.4
32.8-40.1
32.0-38.4
a*
mean
33.9
36.7
33.3
36.1
range
31.5-38.6
35.6-40.2
28.3-36.2
32.2-40.2
b*
mean
14.1
21.2
17.6
16.3
range
9.1-16.5
18.8-25.7
12.2-24.9
13.3-19.5
Munsell
2.5 R 4/10
5 R 5/13
5 R 3/7
5 R 3/7
Internal
L*
mean
61.6
65.6
57.9
48.8
range
59.5-67.7
58.8-67.2
43.3-62.9
30.6-56.0
a*
mean
14.7
5.6
19.0
31.7
range
7.6-19.2
3.0-9.5
7.9-27.7
26.3-36.8
b*
mean
20.2
15.8
21.0
28.4
range
16.1-22.5
14.5-18.2
13.2-27.2
24.1-33.0
Munsell
5 R 6/11
10 R 7/9
7.5 R 4/11
7.5 R 6/12
Achene color
7.5 R 4/11
7.5 R 4/11
10 R 5/6
7.5 Y 7/9
Munsell
*CIELAB is the abbreviation of the international color system known as “Commission Internationale De L'Eclairage” 1978. For recommendations concerning uniform color spaces, color difference equations, and psychometric color terms, see Supplement No. 2 of CIE Publication No. 15, Paris.
TABLE 3
Disease resistance scores for ‘Monterey’
and three comparison cultivars;
Phytophthora and Verticillium scores were
obtained in evaluations conducted in 2004-2006,
Colletotrichum was evaluated in 2005-2006.
Phytophthora
Verticillium
Colletotrichum
Resistance Score
Resistance Score
Resistance Score
Genotype
(5 = best)
(5 = best)
(5 = best
‘Aromas’
4.0
4.5
2.4
‘Diamante’
2.0
2.8
2.6
‘Albion’
4.3
3.8
3.1
‘Monterey’
3.2
3.4
2.6
TABLE 4
Flower and fruit characters for ‘Monterey’
and three comparison cultivars.
Cultivar
Character
‘Aromas’
‘Diamante’
‘Albion’
‘Monterey’
Petal number
mean
5.5
5.4
5.6
6.5
range
5-7
5-6
5-7
5-7
Petal shape
apex
truncate to
truncate to
truncate to
truncate to
slightly
slightly
slightly
slightly
obtuse
obtuse
obtuse
obtuse
base
attenuate
attenuate
attenuate
attenuate
margin
entire
entire
entire
entire
Petal
length (mm)
mean
10.1
9.2
9.6
10.7
range
8-11
7-13
8-11
9-13
Petal
width (mm)
mean
11.8
10.6
9.0
11.3
range
10-13
10-13
7-10
10-13
Flower
most even
most even
most
most
position
some
some
exposed,
exposed,
(relative to
exposed
internal and
some even
some even
foliage)
exposed
Calyx
diam.(mm)
mean
31.3
32.0
37.5
33.2
range
28-33
25-41
31-48
29-40
Corolla
diam.(mm)
mean
31.2
23.9
27.8
32.9
range
26-35
18-31
23-33
25-41
Sepal
length (mm)
mean
12.3
12.1
14.1
11.1
range
8-15
10-15
11-18
10-12
Sepal
width (mm)
mean
6.4
6.7
6.6
6.8
range
3-9
5-9
4-10
5-8
Sepal color
7.5 GY 6/8
5 GY 5/6
2.5 GY 6/8
5 GY 6/8
(Munsell)
Pedicel
length (mm)
mean
172
140
218
246
range
112-230
110-165
180-270
190-270
Pedicel
diameter
(mm)
mean
4.4
5.3
3.1
3.0
range
4-6
4-6
2-4
2-4
Pedicel color
5 GY 6/8
5 GY 7/10
5 GY 6/8
5 GY 7/10
Fruit shape
Fruit length
(mm)
mean
46.6
46.4
61.7
57.2
range
42-52
39-50
50-76
50-62
Fruit width
(mm)
mean
39.4
40.7
46.6
47.9
range
37-43
38-46
37-52
42-55
Length/width
ratio
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.2
range
1.0-1.4
1.0-1.2
1.2-1.5
1.1-1.3
subjective
mostly
rounded to
most long
medium
medium to
flat conic
symmetrical
conic
short flat
conic
conic
Primary/
secondary
fruit
comparison
size
60-80%
60-80%
60-70%
60-80%
(subjective)
shape
similar shape
similar shape
similar shape
similar shape
Extent/size
small-absent
small-absent
small-
small-absent
of
medium
hollow core
Calyx
position
indented-
even-
even-
even-reflexed
even with
indented
reflexed
neck
size relative
equal or
equal or
equal or
equal or
to fruit
greater than
greater than
greater than
greater than
fruit
fruit
fruit
fruit diameter
diameter
diameter
diameter
Seed
indented-
indented-
indented-
even-
position
extruded
even
extruded
indented
Adherence
intermediate
intermediate
intermediate
intermediate
of Calyx to
Fruit
Flower measurements and fruit measurements obtained May 9-Jun. 6, 2006. Subjective observations obtained Jul. 31, 2006.
TABLE 5
Performance ‘Monterey’ and three comparison cultivars
evaluated at the Watsonville Research Facility in 2005-7.
All plants for these trials were harvested from a commercial
nursery near Macdoel, CA on October 15-16,
and transplanted after 18-21 days supplemental storage.
Fruit harvest was initiated in early April and continued
through the first week of October.
(52″ 2-row beds, 17,300 plants/acre).
Appearance
Fruit
Yield
Score
Size
Item
(g/plant)
(5 = best)
(g/fruit)
Firmness
‘Aromas’
3,108
3.1
27.0
9.6
‘Diamante’
2,653
3.5
31.2
11.0
‘Albion’
2,461
3.9
30.5
11.1
‘Monterey’
3,301
3.4
32.4
11.1
Shaw, Douglas V., Larson, Kirk D.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11419301, | Jan 28 2019 | SWEET DARLING SALES, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘Yakima’ |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER76, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 25 2008 | The Regents of the University of California | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 14 2008 | SHAW, DOUGLAS V | The Regents of the University of California | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020745 | /0820 | |
Mar 17 2008 | LARSON, KIRK D | The Regents of the University of California | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020745 | /0853 | |
Sep 04 2012 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO , LTD | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECORDATION OF ASSIGNMENT FOR APPLICATION NUMBER 12011256, PATENT NUMBER PP19767 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 028992 FRAME 0026 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT WAS ERRONEOUSLY RECORDED UNDER APPLICATION NUMBER 12011256, PATENT NUMBER PP19767 | 030295 | /0107 | |
Sep 04 2012 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO , LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 028992 | /0026 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |