This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawSix’. A new cultivar primarily characterized by its medium to large, sweet tasting fruit, early flowering and early harvest maturity, is disclosed.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawSix’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawSix’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Hillsborough, Fla. in December, 2002 and originated from a cross between the female proprietary parent ‘74G14’ (unpatented) and the male proprietary parent ‘6F-158’ (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. ‘DrisStrawSix’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Hillsborough, Fla. for five years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions.
The following description of ‘DrisStrawSix’ is based on observations taken from the 2003 to 2008 growing seasons in Hillsborough, Fla. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawSix’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).
‘DrisStrawSix’ is distinguished from its parents ‘74G14’ or ‘6F158’ mainly by yield and fruit size. ‘DrisStrawSix’ has a significantly higher yield than either ‘74G14’ or ‘6F158’. Additionally, ‘DrisStrawSix’ has a fruit size that is thirty percent larger than either ‘74G14’ or ‘6F158’.
Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,475) and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,298). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.
TABLE 1
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSix’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Plant height
21.3
19.8
20.2
(cm)
Plant diameter
44.0
38.9
38.7
(cm)
Number of
4
3
2
crowns/plant
Habit
Flat globose
Flat globose
Flat
Density of
Medium
Between medium
Medium
individual
and dense
plant
Vigor
Between medium
Medium
Strong
and strong
Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet margin, terminal leaflet length to width ratio, shape of the leaflet, shape of the leaf apex and shape of leaf base.
TABLE 2
Leaf
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSix’
‘Driscoll Atlantis’
‘Driscoll Sanibel’
Terminal leaf-
8.35
7.89
8.56
let length (cm)
Terminal leaf-
8.16
8.01
8.47
let width (cm)
Terminal leaf-
1.0
1.0
1.0
let length/
width ratio
No. teeth/ter-
20
23
22
minal leaflet
Shape of
Between obtuse
Between obtuse
Rounded
teeth
and rounded
and rounded
Color of upper-
RHS 137B
RHS 137A
RHS 131B
side of leaf
Dark green
Dark green
Dark green
Color of under-
RHS 138B
RHS 140D
RHS 142C
side of leaf
Medium green
Light green
Light green
Leaf shape in
Between slightly
Between slightly
Slightly concave
cross section
concave and flat
concave and flat
Leaf blistering
Medium
Medium
Between medium
and strong
Leaf glossiness
Medium
Weak
Medium
No. leaflets
Three only
Three only
Three only
Terminal leaf-
Revolute
Flat
Flat
let margin
Terminal leaf-
As long as broad
As long as broad
As long as broad
let: length/
width ratio
Terminal leaf-
Orbicular
Ovate
Between oval and
let shape
ovate
Terminal leaf-
Slightly oblique
Not available
Obtuse
let base shape
Terminal leaf-
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
let apex shape
Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiol, color of the petiolule, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, and stipule pubescence.
TABLE 3
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSix’
‘Driscoll Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Petiole length
13.4
13.7
15.3
(cm)
Petiole dia-
0.383
0.430
0.455
meter (cm)
Petiole
Medium
Dense
Medium
pubescence
Petiole pose
Outwards
Outwards
Between
of hairs
outwards and
downwards
Petiole color
RHS 145B
RHS 145C
RHS 145D
Light yellow-
Light yellow-
Light yellow-
green
green
green
Petiolule color
RHS 145B
RHS 145C
RHS 145D
Light yellow-
Light yellow-
Light yellow-
green
green
green
Petiolule
1.208
1.451
1.626
length (cm)
Petiolule
0.200
0.213
0.233
diameter (cm)
Bract
1
2
2
frequency
Stipule length
4.1
3.7
3.9
(cm)
Stipule width
0.096
0.087
0.112
(cm)
Stipule
Medium
Dense
Medium
pubescence
Stipule
Weak
anthcyanin
coloration
Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 4
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSix’
‘Driscoll Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Stolon Number
Many
Average number of
50
53
52
daughter plants
Stolon Anthocyanin
Strong
Between weak
Strong
and medium
Stolon Thickness
Medium
Medium
Medium
Stolon Pubescence
Dense
Medium
Medium
Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, petal spacing (relative spacing of petals), petal apex shape, petal margin, petal base shape, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, typical and observed number of petals, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, sepal apex shape, sepal margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, typical and observed number of sepals, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 5
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSix’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Inflorescence
Above
Between level
Between beneath
position rela-
with and above
and level with
tive to foliage
Flower size
Between small
Between
Large
and medium
medium and
large
Flower dia-
2.075
2.369
2.070
meter (cm)
Petal shape
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Between touching
and overlapping
Petal apex
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
shape
Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Petal base
Concavo-convex
Rounded
Rounded
shape
Petal length
1.252
1.248
1.166
(cm)
Petal width
1.322
1.302
1.188
(cm)
Petal length/
As long as broad
As long as broad
As long as broad
width ratio
Petal length/
0.9
1.0
1.0
width ratio
Typical and ob-
6
5
6
served petal
number
Petal color
RHS 155C
RHS 155C
RHS 155C
White
White
White
Calyx dia-
3.304
2.871
2.997
meter (cm)
Calyx dia-
Between same
Between same
Between same
meter relative
size and larger
size and larger
size and larger
to corolla
Inner calyx dia-
Between smaller
Same size
Larger
meter relative
and same size
to outer
Sepal shape
Elliptical
Elliptical
Elliptical
Sepal apex
Convex
Convex
Convex
shape
Sepal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Sepal length
1.200
1.040
1.172
(cm)
Sepal width
0.660
0.713
0.637
(cm)
Typical and ob-
11
11
11
served sepal
number
Receptacle
RHS 4A
RHS 149A
RHS 149B
color
Medium yellow
Dark yellow-
Dark yellow-
green
green
Anther color
RHS 13A
RHS 9A
RHS 9A
Dark yellow
Dark yellow
Dark yellow
Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. These characteristics include fruiting truss length and diameter in centimeters, number of berries per fruiting truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruiting truss length, fruit length in centimeters, fruit width in centimeters, fruit length to width ratio, fruit hollow length and width in centimeters, fruit hollow length to width ratio, fruit weight in grams, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruits, band without achenes, unevenness of fruit surface, fruit skin color, evenness of fruit color, fruit glossiness, insertion of achenes, achene coloration (sunward and shaded sides of berry), insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, adherence of calyx, firmness of flesh, color of the fruit flesh, evenness of the flesh color, distribution of flesh color, relative size of hollow center, sweetness of fruit, acidity of fruit, texture of fruit when tasted, time of flowering, harvest maturity, type of bearing, grams of fruit per plant.
TABLE 6
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSix’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Fruiting truss
25.2
22.7
19.7
length (cm)
Fruiting truss
0.336
0.423
0.404
diameter (cm)
Number of ber-
1
3
1
ries per fruiting
truss
Fruiting truss
Prostrate
Prostrate
Prostrate
attitude
Fruiting truss
Between medium
Medium
Medium
length
and long
Fruit length
5.410
4.200
5.180
(cm)
Fruit width
4.130
3.640
4.610
(cm)
Fruit length/
1.3
1.2
1 .1
width ratio
Fruit length/
Longer than
Longer than
Longer than
width ratio
broad
broad
broad
Fruit hollow
3.050
1.880
2.310
length (cm)
Fruit hollow
0.770
0.850
0.790
width (cm)
Fruit hollow
4.0
2.2
2.9
length/width
ratio
Fruit weight (g)
29.9
23.8
31.8
Relative fruit
Between medium
Medium
Between large
size
and large
and very large
Predominant
Conical
Conical
Conical
fruit shape
Difference in
Slight
Slight
Slight
shape between
primary & sec-
ondary fruits
Band without
Narrow
Absent or very
Narrow
achenes
narrow
Unevenness of
Between weak
Between weak
Medium
fruit surface
and medium
and medium
Fruit skin
RHS 46B
RHS 45B
RHS 43A
color
Medium red
Medium red
Medium red
Evenness of
Slightly uneven
Even
Even
fruit color
Fruit glossiness
Strong
Strong
Strong
Insertion of
Level with
Level with
Level with
achenes
surface
surface
surface
Achene color-
RHS 30A
RHS 185D
RHS 182A
ation sunward
Medium red
Greyed-purple
Medium
side of berry
greyed-red
Achene
RHS 151D
RHS 151D
RHS 150C
coloration
Light yellow-
Light yellow-
Light yellow-
shaded side
green
green
green
of berry
Insertion of
Level
Level
Level
calyx
Pose of
Between
Between
Between
calyx
spreading
spreading and
spreading and
segments
and reflexed
reflexed
reflexed
Size of calyx
Larger
Between same
Larger
in relation to
size and larger
fruit
Adherence of
Strong
Strong
Strong
calyx
Firmness of
Medium
Firm
Medium
flesh
Color of the
RHS 43B
RHS 42B
RHS 40C
flesh
Medium red
Medium red
Medium red
Evenness of
Slightly uneven
Slightly uneven
Slightly uneven
flesh color
Distribution of
Only marginal
Marginal and
Marginal and
flesh color
central
central
Hollow center
Small
Medium
Medium
Sweetness
Strong
Strong
Strong
Acidity
Medium
Medium
Medium
Texture when
Between fine
Medium
Fine
tasted
and medium
Time of
Early
Very early
Early
flowering
Harvest matur-
Early December
Late November
Late November
ity (50% of
to late April
to mid-March
to mid-March
plants with
ripe fruit)
Type of
Not everbearing
Partially
Partially
bearing
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of
568
360
448
fruit/plant
Table 7 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’.
TABLE 7
Pest or
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Disease
‘DrisStrawSix’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Xanthomonas
Susceptible
Moderately
Moderately
fragarie
susceptible
susceptible
Stewart, Philip J., Gilford, Kristie L., Pullen, Esther J.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 07 2008 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 16 2008 | STEWART, PHILIP J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023212 | /0269 | |
Oct 24 2008 | GILFORD, KRISTIE L | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023212 | /0269 | |
Oct 27 2008 | PULLEN, ESTHER J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023212 | /0269 | |
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040727 | /0374 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |