This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawEleven’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by its medium-sized, conical-shaped fruit having a strong sweetness and medium acidity and moderate resistance to Strawberry Moftle Virus, is disclosed.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawEleven’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawEleven’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Monterey, Calif. in summer 2004 and originated from a cross between the proprietary female parent ‘122J81’ (unpatented) and the proprietary male parent ‘111H69’ (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was first asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif.
‘DrisStrawEleven’ was subsequently asexually propagated in Shasta County, Calif. and underwent further testing at nurseries in Monterey and San Luis Obispo, Calif. for five years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photographs were taken from plants that were 7 months-old.
The following description of ‘DrisStrawEleven’ is based on observations taken in Monterey and San Luis Obispo, Calif. from 2004–2008. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawEleven’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘DrisStrawEleven’ was taken from 7 month-old plants and the botanical descriptions of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’ were taken from 7 month-old plants. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).
Table 1 shows selected plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899). Plant characteristics include plant habit, terminal leaflet margin profile, insertion of achenes and fruit production.
TABLE 1
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawEleven’
Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Plant habit
Upright
Flat
Between upright
globose
and flat globose
Terminal leaflet
Cupped
Revolute
Revolute
margin profile
Insertion of
Level with
Above
Below surface
achenes
surface
surface
Fruit production,
1400
1609
1412
grams/plant
Table 2 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, the number of crowns per plant, habit, the density of individual plants and the vigor.
TABLE 2
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawEleven’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Plant height
24.4
25.1
24.7
(cm)
Plant diameter
37.5
36.5
38.9
(cm)
Number of
3
3
3
crowns/plant
Habit
Upright
Flat globose
Globose
Density of in-
Between open
Medium
Between
dividual plant
and medium
medium and
dense
Vigor
Strong
Medium
Medium
Table 3 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet margin, terminal leaflet length to width ratio, overall leaf shape and shape of leaf apex and base.
TABLE 3
Leaf
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawEleven’
Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Terminal leaflet
0.76
0.79
0.74
length (cm)
Terminal leaflet
0.82
0.76
0.79
width (cm)
Terminal leaflet
0.9
1.0
0.9
length/width ratio
No. teeth/
21
23
25
terminal leaflet
Shape of teeth
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Color of
RHS 147A
RHS 147A
RHS 147A
upper surface
(Dark
(Dark
(Dark yellow-
of leaf
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
green)
Color of lower
RHS 147C
RHS 147C
RHS 147B
surface of
(Medium yellow-
(Medium
(Medium
leaf
green)
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Leaf shape in
Concave
Slightly
Concave
cross section
concave
Leaf blistering
Medium
Medium
Weak
Leaf glossiness
Medium
Medium
Medium
No. leaflets
3
3
3
Terminal leaflet
Cupped
Revolute
Revolute
margin
Terminal leaflet:
As long as
As long as
As long as
length/width ratio
broad
broad
broad
Terminal leaflet
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
shape
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
base shape
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
apex shape
Table 4 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence and stipule anthocyanin coloration.
TABLE 4
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawEleven’
Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Petiole length
11.2
13.6
11.0
(cm)
Petiole diameter
0.403
0.389
0.404
(cm)
Petiole
Medium
Dense
Dense
pubescence
Petiole pose of
Upwards
Outwards
Upwards
hairs
Petiole color
RHS 145A
RHS 144C
RHS 144C
(Medium yellow-
(Medium
(Medium
green)
yellow-
yellow-green)
green)
Petiolule color
RHS 145B
RHS 144C
RHS 145B
(Medium yellow-
(Medium
(Medium
green)
yellow-
yellow-green)
green)
Petiolule length
1.102
1.203
0.734
(cm)
Petiolule dia-
0.202
0.151
0.177
meter (cm)
Bract frequency
0
0
1
Stipule length
3.3
3.5
3.2
(cm)
Stipule width
1.212
0.832
1.167
(cm)
Stipule
Medium
Dense
Dense
pubescence
Stipule antho-
Absent or very
Absent or very
Absent or very
cyanin
weak
weak
weak
coloration
Table 5 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 5
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawEleven’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Stolon Number
Medium
Many
Between
medium
and many
Average number of
42
17
57
daughter plants
Stolon Anthocyanin
Medium
Strong
Strong
Stolon Thickness
Thick
Between medium
Medium
and thick
Stolon Pubescence
Medium
Dense
Medium
Table 6 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, time of flowering, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, relative spacing of petals, petal apex, base and margin, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, number of petals, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, apex and margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, number of sepals, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 6
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawEleven’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Inflorescence
Beneath
Above
Above
position relative
to foliage
Time of flowering
Between early
Between early
Between
(50% of plants at
and medium
and medium
early and
first flower)
medium
Flower size
Medium
Medium
Medium
Flower diameter
2.882
2.835
2.850
(cm)
Petal shape
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
Petal spacing
Touching to
Overlapping
Overlapping
overlapping
Petal apex shape
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Petal base shape
Concave-
Concave-
Concave-
convex
convex
convex
Petal length (cm)
1.181
1.133
1.227
Petal width (cm)
1.334
1.200
1.339
Petal length/width
0.9 - As
0.9 - As
0.9 - As
ratio
long as broad
long as broad
long as
broad
Typical and
6
6
6
observed petal
number
Petal color
RHS 155D
RHS 155B
RHS 155C
(White)
(White)
(White)
Calyx diameter
3.307
3.647
3.969
(cm)
Calyx diameter
Smaller
Between larger
Larger
relative to corolla
and much larger
Inner calyx
Same size
Same size
Same size
diameter
relative to outer
Sepal shape
Elliptical
Elliptical
Elliptical
Sepal apex shape
Convex
Convex
Convex
Sepal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Sepal length (cm)
1.131
1.297
1.330
Sepal width (cm)
0.593
0.560
1.266
Typical and
12
13
13
observed
sepal number
Receptacle color
RHS 1A (Medium
RHS 150B
RHS 2B
yellow-green)
(Medium yellow-
(Medium
green)
yellow)
Anther color
RHS 166A
RHS N167C
RHS163B
(Dark
(Light greyed-
(Medium
greyed-orange)
orange)
greyed-
orange)
Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include fruiting truss length in centimeters, fruiting truss diameter, number of berries per truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruiting truss color, fruit length in centimeters, fruit truss width in centimeters, fruit length to width ratio, fruit hollow length and width in centimeters, fruit hollow length to width ratio, fruit weight in grams, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruits, band without achenes, unevenness of fruit surface, fruit skin color, evenness of fruit color, fruit glossiness, insertion of achenes, achene coloration (sunward and shaded sides of berry) and the number of achenes per berry.
TABLE 7
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawEleven’
Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Fruiting truss
18.0
22.2
25.1
length (cm)
Fruiting truss
Medium
Long
Long
length-general
Fruiting truss
0.551
0.360
0.481
diameter (cm)
Number of berries
3
4
4
per fruiting truss
Fruiting truss
Semi-erect
Semi-erect
Semi-erect
attitude
Fruiting truss
RHS 144A
RHS 144A
RHS 144A
color at
(Medium yellow-
(Medium
(Medium
base of truss
green)
yellow-
yellow-green)
green)
Fruit length (cm)
4.233
4.327
4.857
Fruit width (cm)
3.930
4.431
4.603
Fruit length/
1.1
1.0
1.1
width ratio
Fruit hollow
1.971
2.055
2.169
length (cm)
Fruit hollow
1.190
0.774
0.738
width (cm)
Fruit hollow
1.7
2.7
2.9
length/width ratio
Fruit weight (g)
24.5
25.6
28.0
Relative fruit size
Medium
Medium
Large
Predominant fruit
Conical
Conical
Conical
shape
Difference in shape
Slight
Slight
Slight
between primary &
secondary fruits
Band without
Narrow
Narrow
Narrow
achenes
Unevenness of fruit
Between weak
Between
Medium
surface
and medium
medium and
strong
Fruit skin color
RHS 46A
RHS 46A
RHS 53A
(Dark red)
(Dark red)
(Dark red)
Evenness of
Even
Even
Even
fruit color
Fruit glossiness
Between medium
Medium
Between
and strong
medium and
strong
Insertion of
Level with
Above
Below
achenes
surface
surface
surface
Achene coloration -
RHS 183A
RHS 183C
RHS 180B
sunward side of
(Dark
(Dark
(Medium
berry
greyed-purple)
greyed-
greyed-red)
purple)
Achene coloration
RHS 180B
RHS 152B
RHS 150B
shaded side
(Medium greyed-
(Medium
(Light yellow-
of berry
red)
yellow-
green)
green)
Achenes per berry
278
345
397
Table 8 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include the harvest maturity, insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, adherence of calyx, firmness of flesh, color of the fruit flesh, evenness of the flesh color, distribution of flesh color, hollow center, sweetness of fruit, acidity of fruit, texture of fruit when tasted, type of bearing, grams of fruit per plant.
TABLE 8
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawEleven’
Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Harvest maturity
Late March to
Late March to
Late March to
early November
early
early
November
November
Insertion of calyx
Level
Level
Level
Pose of calyx
Spreading
Reflexed
Reflexed
segments
Size of calyx
Larger
Larger
Between
in relation
smaller and
to fruit
same size
Adherence of
Strong
Medium
Strong
calyx
Firmness of flesh
Firm
Medium
Firm
Color of
RHS 44B
RHS 41B
RHS 41A
the flesh
(Medium
(Medium red)
(Medium red)
red) and RHS
and RHS 155A
and RHS 155B
N155C (white)
white
white
Evenness of
Uneven
Slightly
Slightly uneven
flesh color
uneven
Distribution of
Marginal and
Marginal and
Marginal and
flesh color
central
central
central
Hollow center
Small
Medium
Small
Sweetness
Strong
Medium
Strong
Acidity
Medium
Medium
Weak
Texture when
Coarse
Medium
Fine
tasted
Type of bearing
Partially
Partially
Partially
everbearing
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of fruit/
1400
1609
1412
plant
Table 9 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.
TABLE 9
Pest, Stress or
Disease
‘DrisStrawEleven’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Tetranychus
Susceptible
Susceptible
Moderately
urticae
usceptible
Botrytis
Moderately
Susceptible
Susceptible
fruit rot
susceptible
Powdery mildew
Susceptible
Susceptible
Susceptible
Verticillium wilt
Susceptible
Moderately
Susceptible
susceptible
Strawberry mottle
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
virus
resistant
resistant
resistant
Xanthomonas
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
fragariae
susceptible
susceptible
susceptible
When ‘DrisStrawEleven’ is compared to the proprietary female parent ‘122J81’ (unpatented), ‘DrisStrawEleven’ has larger fruit than ‘122J81’. Additionally, ‘DrisStrawEleven’ is partially everbearing, while ‘122J81’ is everbearing.
When ‘DrisStrawEleven’ is compared to the proprietary male parent ‘111H69’ (unpatented), ‘DrisStrawEleven’ has smaller fruit and has a lower chilling requirement than ‘111H69’.
Mowrey, Bruce D., Stewart, Philip J., Wilson, Matthew P., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F., Ferguson, Michael D.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 10 2008 | COSS, JOANNE F | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022035 | /0961 | |
Nov 10 2008 | MADESKO, MARTIN P | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022035 | /0961 | |
Nov 11 2008 | FERGUSON, MICHAEL D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022035 | /0961 | |
Nov 12 2008 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 17 2008 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022035 | /0961 | |
Nov 17 2008 | STEWART, PHILIP J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022035 | /0961 | |
Dec 02 2008 | WILSON, MATTHEW P | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022035 | /0961 | |
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040696 | /0625 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |