This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawNine’. A new cultivar primarily characterized by its small hollow center, early to medium flowering time, everbearing fruit, low number of achenes per berry, and moderate resistance to Strawberry Mottle Virus is disclosed.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawNine’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawNine’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Summer, 2004 in Monterey, Calif. and originated from a cross between the female parent ‘94J283’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented) and the male parent ‘112H25’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Monterey, Calif. ‘DrisStrawNine’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Monterey, Calif. for five years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photograph is of a plant about 7 months old.
The following description of ‘DrisStrawNine’ is based on observations taken from the 2004 to 2008 growing seasons in Monterey, Calif. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawNine’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).
Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties, ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.
TABLE 1
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawNine’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Plant height
20.9
25.1
24.7
(cm)
Plant diameter
32.9
36.5
38.9
(cm)
Number of
3
3
3
crowns/plant
Habit
Upright
Flat globose
Globose
Density of
Medium
Medium
Between medium
individual plant
and dense
Vigor
Weak
Medium
Medium
Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, leaflet margin, leaflet shape, shape of leaf apex and shape of leaf base.
TABLE 2
Leaf
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawNine’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Terminal
6.8
7.9
7.4
leaflet
length (cm)
Terminal
7.2
7.6
7.9
leaflet
width (cm)
Terminal
1.0
1.0
0.9
leaflet
length/width
ratio
Terminal
As long as broad
As long as broad
As long as
leaflet:
broad
length/width
ratio
No.
24
23
25
teeth/terminal
leaflet
Shape of teeth
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Color of
RHS 147A
RHS 147A
RHS 147A
upperside of
Dark yellow-
Dark yellow-
Dark yellow-
leaf
green
green
green
Color of
RHS 147B
RHS 147C
RHS 147B
underside of
Medium
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
leaf
yellow-green
green
green
Leaf shape in
Concave
Slightly concave
Concave
cross section
Leaf blistering
Medium
Medium
Weak
Leaf
Between medium
Medium
Medium
glossiness
and strong
No. leaflets
Three only
Three only
Three only
Terminal
Flat
Revolute
Revolute
leaflet margin
Terminal
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
leaflet shape
Terminal
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
leaflet
shape of base
Terminal
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
leaflet
shape of apex
Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule and stipule anthocyanin coloration.
TABLE 3
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawNine’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Petiole length
11.2
13.6
11.0
(cm)
Petiole
0.323
0.389
0.404
diameter (cm)
Petiole
Dense
Dense
Dense
pubescence
Petiole pose of
Upwards
Outwards
Upwards
hairs
Petiole color
RHS 145A
RHS 144C
RHS 144C
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
green
green
green
Petiolule color
RHS 145B
RHS 144C
RHS 145A
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
green
green
green
Petiolule length
0.826
1.203
0.734
(cm)
Petiolule
0.158
0.151
0.177
diameter (cm)
Bract
1
0
1
frequency
Stipule length
3.4
3.5
3.2
(cm)
Stipule width
0.823
0.832
1.167
(cm)
Stipule
Medium
Dense
Dense
pubescence
Stipule
Absent to very
Absent to very
Absent to very
anthocyanin
weak
weak
weak
coloration
Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 4
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawNine’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Stolon number
Medium
Many
Between medium
and many
Average
35
17
57
number of
daughter plants
Stolon
Medium
Strong
Strong
anthocyanin
Stolon
Medium
Between medium
Medium
thickness
and thick
Stolon
Sparse
Dense
Medium
pubescence
Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, petal apex shape, petal base shape, petal margin, relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, typical number of petals observed, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, sepal apex shape, sepal margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, typical number of sepals observed, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 5
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawNine’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Inflorescence
Above
Above
Above
position
relative to
foliage
Flower size
Medium
Medium
Medium
Flower
2.920
2.835
2.850
diameter (cm)
Petal shape
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
Petal apex
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Petal base
Concave-convex
Concave-convex
Concave-convex
shape
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Overlapping
Petal length
1.257
1.133
1.227
(cm)
Petal width
1.332
1.200
1.339
(cm)
Petal length/
0.9
0.9
0.9
width ratio
Typical and
7
6
6
observed petal
number
Petal length/
As long as broad
Longer than
Longer than
width ratio
broad
broad
Petal color
RHS 155B White
RHS 155B
RHS 155C White
White
Calyx diameter
3.573
3.647
3.969
(cm)
Calyx diameter
Larger
Between larger
Larger
relative to
and much larger
corolla
Inner calyx
Same size
Same size
Same size
diameter
relative to outer
Sepal shape
Elliptical
Elliptical
Elliptical
Sepal apex
Convex
Convex
Convex
Sepal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Sepal length
1.318
1.297
1.330
(cm)
Sepal width
0.647
0.560
1.266
(cm)
Typical and
14
13
13
observed sepal
number
Receptacle
RHS 2B Medium
RHS 150B
RHS 2B Medium
color
yellow
Medium yellow-
yellow
green
Anther color
RHS 22A
RHS N167C
RHS 163B
Medium yellow-
Light greyed-
Medium greyed-
orange
orange
orange
Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.
TABLE 6
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawNine’
Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Fruiting truss
16.9
22.2
25.1
length (cm)
Fruiting truss
0.512
0.360
0.481
diameter (cm)
Number of
4
4
4
berries per
fruiting truss
Fruiting truss
Semi-erect
Semi-erect
Semi-erect
attitude
Fruiting truss
Medium
Long
Long
length
Truss color
RHS 144A
RHS 144A
RHS 144A
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
green
green
green
Fruit length
4.274
4.327
4.857
(cm)
Fruit width
4.222
4.431
4.603
(cm)
Fruit length/
1.0
1.0
1.1
width ratio
Fruit length/
As long as broad
As long as
As long as
width ratio
broad
broad
Fruit weight (g)
23.1
25.6
28.0
Relative fruit
Medium
Medium
Large
size
Predominant
Conical
Conical
Conical
fruit shape
Difference in
Slight
Slight
Slight
shape between
primary & sec-
ondary fruits
Band without
Narrow
Narrow
Narrow
achenes
Unevenness of
Weak
Between
Medium
fruit surface
medium and
strong
Fruit skin color
RHS 46A Dark
RHS 46A Dark
RHS 53A
red
red
Dark red
Evenness of
Even
Even
Even
fruit color
Fruit glossiness
Medium
Medium
Between
medium and
strong
Insertion of
Level with
Above surface
Below surface
achenes
surface
Achene
RHS 184A Dark
RHS 183C
RHS 180B
coloration-
greyed-purple
Dark greyed-
Dark greyed-
sunward side of
purple
red
berry
Achene
RHS 153B
RHS 152B
RHS 150B light
coloration-
Medium yellow-
medium yellow-
yellow-green
shaded side of
green
green
berry
Achenes per
320
345
397
berry
Achene weight
0.0005525
0.000497336
0.000558419
(g)
Insertion of
Level
Level
Level
calyx
Pose of calyx
Spreading
Reflexed
Reflexed
segments
Size of calyx in
Larger
Larger
Between
relation to fruit
smaller and
same size
Adherence of
Strong
Medium
Strong
calyx
Firmness of
Medium
Medium
Firm
flesh
Color of the
RHS 155C White
RHS 155A
RHS 155B
flesh
and RHS 41A
White and RHS
White and RHS
medium red
41B medium
41A medium
red
red
Evenness of
Uneven
Slightly uneven
Slightly uneven
flesh color
Distribution of
Marginal and
Marginal and
Marginal and
flesh color
central
central
central
Fruit hollow
1.341
2.055
2.169
length (cm)
Fruit hollow
1.023
0.774
0.738
width (cm)
Fruit hollow
1.3
2.7
2.9
length/width
ratio
Hollow center
Small
Medium
Small
Sweetness
Medium
Medium
Strong
Acidity
Medium
Medium
Weak
Texture when
Medium
Medium
Fine
tasted
Time of
Between early
Between early
Between early
flowering
and medium
and medium
and medium
Harvest
Late March to
Late March to
Late March to
maturity (50%
early November
early
early
of plants with
November
November
ripe fruit)
Type of
Fully everbearing
Partially
Partially
bearing
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of
1,505
1,609
1,412
fruit/plant
Table 7 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.
TABLE 7
Pest or Disease
‘DrisStrawNine’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Tetranychus
Moderately
Susceptible
Moderately
urticae (2-
susceptible
susceptible
spotted spider
mite)
Botrytis fruit
Susceptible
Susceptible
Susceptible
rot
Powdery
Between
Susceptible
Susceptible
mildew
moderately
susceptible and
susceptible
Verticillium
Susceptible
Moderately
Susceptible
wilt
susceptible
Viral diseases-
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
Strawberry
resistant
resistant
resistant
Mottle Virus
Xanthomonas
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
fragariae
susceptible
susceptible
susceptible
Mowrey, Bruce D., Stewart, Philip J., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 05 2008 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022262 | /0673 | |
Nov 05 2008 | STEWART, PHILIP J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022262 | /0673 | |
Nov 07 2008 | COSS, JOANNE F | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022262 | /0673 | |
Nov 10 2008 | MADESKO, MARTIN P | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022262 | /0673 | |
Nov 12 2008 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040696 | /0597 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |