This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawTen’. A new cultivar primarily characterized by its high fruit production per plant, early to medium flowering time, everbearing fruit, low number of achenes per berry, resistance to moderate resistance to powdery mildew, and moderate resistance to Verticillium wilt and strawberry Mottle Virus is disclosed.

Patent
   PP20775
Priority
Nov 12 2008
Filed
Nov 12 2008
Issued
Feb 23 2010
Expiry
Nov 12 2028
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
65
0
n/a
1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant as described and shown herein.

Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.

Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawTen’.

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawTen’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Summer, 2004 in Monterey, Calif. and originated from a cross between the female parent ‘94J283’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented) and the male parent ‘112H25’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. ‘DrisStrawTen’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Monterey, Calif. for five years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.

The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photograph is of a plant about 7 months old.

FIG. 1 shows overall plant habit including fruit at various stages of development.

FIG. 2 shows leaves of the plant with three leaflets.

FIG. 3 shows both the upperside and underside of several of the flowers.

FIG. 4 shows the whole fruit.

FIG. 5 shows the fruit in longitudinal cross-section.

The following description of ‘DrisStrawTen’ is based on observations taken from the 2004 to 2008 growing seasons in Monterey, Calif. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawTen’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).

Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties, ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.

TABLE 1
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’
Plant height (cm) 21.4 25.1 24.7
Plant diameter (cm) 33.4 36.5 38.9
Number of 3 3 3
crowns/plant
Habit Globose Flat globose Globose
Density of Between medium Medium Between
individual plant and dense medium and
dense
Vigor Between weak Medium Medium
and medium

Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, leaflet margin, leaflet shape, shape of leaf apex and shape of leaf base.

TABLE 2
Leaf Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’
Terminal leaflet 7.1 7.9 7.4
length (cm)
Terminal leaflet 7.2 7.6 7.9
width (cm)
Terminal leaflet 1.0 1.0 0.9
length/width ratio
Terminal leaflet: As long as As long as As long as
length/width ratio broad broad broad
No. teeth/terminal 21 23 25
leaflet
Shape of teeth Rounded Rounded Rounded
Color of upperside RHS 147A RHS 147A RHS 147A
of leaf Dark yellow- Dark yellow- Dark yellow-
green green green
Color of underside RHS 147C RHS 147C RHS 147B
of leaf Medium yellow- Medium yellow- Medium
green green yellow-green
Leaf shape in Slightly Slightly Concave
cross section concave concave
Leaf blistering Medium Medium Weak
Leaf glossiness Between medium Medium Medium
and strong
No. leaflets Three only Three only Three only
Terminal leaflet Flat Revolute Revolute
margin
Terminal leaflet Orbicular Orbicular Orbicular
shape
Terminal leaflet Rounded Rounded Rounded
shape of base
Terminal leaflet Rounded Rounded Rounded
shape of apex

Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule and stipule anthocyanin coloration.

TABLE 3
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’
Petiole length (cm) 12.1 13.6 11.0
Petiole diameter 0.340 0.389 0.404
(cm)
Petiole pubescence Dense Dense Dense
Petiole pose of hairs Outwards Outwards Upwards
Petiole color RHS 145A RHS 144C RHS 144C
Medium yellow- Medium yellow- Medium
green green yellow-green
Petiolule color RHS 145B RHS 144C RHS 145B
Medium yellow- Medium Medium
green yellow-green yellow-green
Petiolule 0.831 1.203 0.734
length (cm)
Petiolule 0.164 0.151 0.177
diameter (cm)
Bract frequency 1 0 1
Stipule length (cm) 3.1 3.5 3.2
Stipule width (cm) 0.973 0.832 1.197
Stipule pubescence Medium Dense Dense
Stipule anthocyanin Absent to Absent to Absent to
coloration very weak very weak very weak

Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.

TABLE 4
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’
Stolon number Medium Many Between
medium and
many
Average number of 35 17 57
daughter plants
Stolon anthocyanin Medium Strong Strong
Stolon thickness Medium Between medium Medium
and thick
Stolon pubescence Sparse Dense Medium

Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, petal apex shape, petal base shape, petal margin, relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, typical number of petals observed, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, sepal apex shape, sepal margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, typical number of sepals observed, receptacle color and anther color.

TABLE 5
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’
Inflorescence Above Above Above
position relative
to foliage
Flower size Medium Medium Medium
Flower diameter 2.785 2.835 2.850
(cm)
Petal shape Orbicular Orbicular Orbicular
Petal apex Rounded Rounded Rounded
Petal margin Entire Entire Entire
Petal base shape Concave- Concave- Concave-
convex convex convex
Petal spacing Overlapping Overlapping Overlapping
Petal length (cm) 1.254 1.133 1.227
Petal width (cm) 1.332 1.200 1.339
Petal length/ 0.9 0.9 0.9
width ratio
Typical and 7 6 6
observed petal
number
Petal length/ As long as As long as As long as
width ratio broad broad broad
Petal color RHS 155C RHS 155B RHS 155C
White White White
Calyx diameter 3.696 3.647 3.960
cm
Calyx diameter Larger Between larger Larger
relative and much
to corolla larger
Inner calyx Same size Same size Same size
diameter relative
to outer
Sepal shape Elliptical Elliptical Elliptical
Sepal apex Convex Convex Convex
Sepal margin Entire Entire Entire
Sepal length cm 1.380 1.297 1.330
Sepal width (cm) 0.655 0.560 1.269
Typical and 14 13 13
observed sepal
number
Receptacle color RHS 2A RHS 150B RHS 2A
Medium Medium yellow- Medium
yellow green yellow
Anther color RHS 163B RHS N167C RHS 163B
Medium Light greyed- Medium
greyed-orange orange greyed-orange

Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.

TABLE 6
‘Driscoll
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ Lanai’ ‘San Juan’
Fruiting truss 20.2 22.2 25.1
length (cm)
Fruiting truss 0.442 0.360 0.481
diameter (cm)
Number of berries 4 4 4
per fruiting
truss
Fruiting truss Erect Semi-erect Semi-erect
attitude
Fruiting truss Medium Long Long
length
Truss color RHS 144A RHS 144A RHS 144A
Medium Medium Medium
yellow- yellow- yellow-
green green green
Fruit length 4.207 4.327 4.857
(cm)
Fruit width 4.289 4.431 4.603
(cm)
Fruit length/ 1.0 1.0 1.1
width ratio
Fruit length/ As long as As long as As long as
width ratio broad broad broad
Fruit weight 23.1 25.6 28.0
(g)
Relative fruit Medium Medium Large
size
Predominant fruit Conical Conical Conical
shape
Difference in Slight Slight Slight
shape between
primary &
secondary fruits
Band without Narrow Narrow Narrow
achenes
Unevenness Weak Between Medium
of fruit medium and
surface strong
Fruit skin RHS 45A RHS 46A RHS 53A
color Dark red Dark red Dark red
Evenness of Even Even Even
fruit color
Fruit glossiness Medium Medium Between
medium and
strong
Insertion of Level with Above surface Below surface
achenes surface
Achene RHS 185A RHS 183C RHS 180B
coloration- Dark Dark Medium
sunward side greyed- greyed- greyed-red
of berry purple purple
Achene coloration- RHS 151B RHS 152B RHS 150B
shaded side of Medium medium light yellow-
berry yellow-green yellow- green
green
Achenes per berry 324 345 397
Achene weight (g) 0.00057453 0.000497336 0.000558419
Insertion of calyx Level Level Level
Pose of calyx Spreading Reflexed Reflexed
segments
Size of calyx Same size Larger Between
in relation smaller and
to fruit same size
Adherence Medium Medium Strong
of calyx
Firmness Medium Medium Firm
of flesh
Color of the RHS 43B RHS 155A RHS 155B
flesh Medium White and White and
red and RHS 41B RHS 41A
RHS 49D medium red medium red
light red
Evenness of Uneven Slightly uneven Slightly
flesh color uneven
Distribution Marginal and Marginal and Marginal and
of flesh color central central central
Fruit hollow 2.047 2.055 2.169
length (cm)
Fruit hollow 1.610 0.774 0.738
width (cm)
Fruit hollow 1.3 2.7 2.9
length/width ratio
Hollow center Medium Medium Small
Sweetness Medium Medium Strong
Acidity Medium Medium Weak
Texture when tasted Medium Medium Fine
Time of flowering Between early Between early Between early
and medium and medium and medium
Harvest maturity Late March Late March Late March
(50% of plants to early to early to early
with ripe fruit) November November November
Type of bearing Fully everbearing Partially Partially
everbearing everbearing
Grams of fruit/plant 1,769 1,609 1,412

Table 7 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.

TABLE 7
‘Driscoll
Pest or Disease ‘DrisStrawTen’ Lanai’ ‘San Juan’
Tetranychus urticae Moderately Susceptible Moderately
(2-spotted spider susceptible susceptible
mite)
Botrytis fruit Susceptible Susceptible Susceptible
rot
Powdery mildew Between resistant Susceptible Susceptible
and moderately
resistant
Verticillium Moderately Moderately Susceptible
wilt resistant susceptible
Viral diseases - Moderately Moderately Moderately
Strawberry Mottle resistant resistant resistant
Virus
Xanthomonas Moderately Moderately Moderately
fragariae susceptible susceptible susceptible

Mowrey, Bruce D., Stewart, Philip J., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER1136,
ER1281,
ER1840,
ER1902,
ER1967,
ER2330,
ER2362,
ER2487,
ER2617,
ER2850,
ER2853,
ER2995,
ER2996,
ER313,
ER3157,
ER3345,
ER367,
ER3795,
ER3852,
ER3927,
ER4121,
ER4280,
ER4296,
ER4472,
ER5037,
ER51,
ER5256,
ER5406,
ER5882,
ER6311,
ER6331,
ER6770,
ER6873,
ER7167,
ER7221,
ER7256,
ER7494,
ER7669,
ER778,
ER7959,
ER8,
ER8071,
ER8327,
ER8550,
ER8608,
ER8655,
ER8731,
ER9427,
ER9485,
ER9635,
ER964,
ER9757,
ER9999,
PP27645, Mar 06 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’
PP27682, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’
PP27711, Apr 10 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’
PP27813, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’
PP29289, Mar 25 2016 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’
PP29728, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’
PP29729, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’
PP29730, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’
PP29731, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’
PP29747, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’
PP29748, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’
PP29749, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
///////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 05 2008MOWREY, BRUCE D Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0235550778 pdf
Nov 05 2008STEWART, PHILIP J Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0235550778 pdf
Nov 07 2008COSS, JOANNE F Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0235550778 pdf
Nov 10 2008MADESKO, MARTIN P Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0235550778 pdf
Nov 12 2008Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 23 2010DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC ,AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST0255250237 pdf
Sep 30 2016Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncDRISCOLL S, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0407310326 pdf
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule