This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawTen’. A new cultivar primarily characterized by its high fruit production per plant, early to medium flowering time, everbearing fruit, low number of achenes per berry, resistance to moderate resistance to powdery mildew, and moderate resistance to Verticillium wilt and strawberry Mottle Virus is disclosed.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawTen’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawTen’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Summer, 2004 in Monterey, Calif. and originated from a cross between the female parent ‘94J283’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented) and the male parent ‘112H25’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. ‘DrisStrawTen’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Monterey, Calif. for five years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photograph is of a plant about 7 months old.
The following description of ‘DrisStrawTen’ is based on observations taken from the 2004 to 2008 growing seasons in Monterey, Calif. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawTen’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).
Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties, ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.
TABLE 1
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Plant height (cm)
21.4
25.1
24.7
Plant diameter (cm)
33.4
36.5
38.9
Number of
3
3
3
crowns/plant
Habit
Globose
Flat globose
Globose
Density of
Between medium
Medium
Between
individual plant
and dense
medium and
dense
Vigor
Between weak
Medium
Medium
and medium
Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, leaflet margin, leaflet shape, shape of leaf apex and shape of leaf base.
TABLE 2
Leaf Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Terminal leaflet
7.1
7.9
7.4
length (cm)
Terminal leaflet
7.2
7.6
7.9
width (cm)
Terminal leaflet
1.0
1.0
0.9
length/width ratio
Terminal leaflet:
As long as
As long as
As long as
length/width ratio
broad
broad
broad
No. teeth/terminal
21
23
25
leaflet
Shape of teeth
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Color of upperside
RHS 147A
RHS 147A
RHS 147A
of leaf
Dark yellow-
Dark yellow-
Dark yellow-
green
green
green
Color of underside
RHS 147C
RHS 147C
RHS 147B
of leaf
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
Medium
green
green
yellow-green
Leaf shape in
Slightly
Slightly
Concave
cross section
concave
concave
Leaf blistering
Medium
Medium
Weak
Leaf glossiness
Between medium
Medium
Medium
and strong
No. leaflets
Three only
Three only
Three only
Terminal leaflet
Flat
Revolute
Revolute
margin
Terminal leaflet
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
shape
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
shape of base
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
shape of apex
Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule and stipule anthocyanin coloration.
TABLE 3
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Petiole length (cm)
12.1
13.6
11.0
Petiole diameter
0.340
0.389
0.404
(cm)
Petiole pubescence
Dense
Dense
Dense
Petiole pose of hairs
Outwards
Outwards
Upwards
Petiole color
RHS 145A
RHS 144C
RHS 144C
Medium yellow-
Medium yellow-
Medium
green
green
yellow-green
Petiolule color
RHS 145B
RHS 144C
RHS 145B
Medium yellow-
Medium
Medium
green
yellow-green
yellow-green
Petiolule
0.831
1.203
0.734
length (cm)
Petiolule
0.164
0.151
0.177
diameter (cm)
Bract frequency
1
0
1
Stipule length (cm)
3.1
3.5
3.2
Stipule width (cm)
0.973
0.832
1.197
Stipule pubescence
Medium
Dense
Dense
Stipule anthocyanin
Absent to
Absent to
Absent to
coloration
very weak
very weak
very weak
Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 4
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Stolon number
Medium
Many
Between
medium and
many
Average number of
35
17
57
daughter plants
Stolon anthocyanin
Medium
Strong
Strong
Stolon thickness
Medium
Between medium
Medium
and thick
Stolon pubescence
Sparse
Dense
Medium
Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, petal apex shape, petal base shape, petal margin, relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, typical number of petals observed, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, sepal apex shape, sepal margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, typical number of sepals observed, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 5
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Inflorescence
Above
Above
Above
position relative
to foliage
Flower size
Medium
Medium
Medium
Flower diameter
2.785
2.835
2.850
(cm)
Petal shape
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
Petal apex
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Petal base shape
Concave-
Concave-
Concave-
convex
convex
convex
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Overlapping
Petal length (cm)
1.254
1.133
1.227
Petal width (cm)
1.332
1.200
1.339
Petal length/
0.9
0.9
0.9
width ratio
Typical and
7
6
6
observed petal
number
Petal length/
As long as
As long as
As long as
width ratio
broad
broad
broad
Petal color
RHS 155C
RHS 155B
RHS 155C
White
White
White
Calyx diameter
3.696
3.647
3.960
cm
Calyx diameter
Larger
Between larger
Larger
relative
and much
to corolla
larger
Inner calyx
Same size
Same size
Same size
diameter relative
to outer
Sepal shape
Elliptical
Elliptical
Elliptical
Sepal apex
Convex
Convex
Convex
Sepal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Sepal length cm
1.380
1.297
1.330
Sepal width (cm)
0.655
0.560
1.269
Typical and
14
13
13
observed sepal
number
Receptacle color
RHS 2A
RHS 150B
RHS 2A
Medium
Medium yellow-
Medium
yellow
green
yellow
Anther color
RHS 163B
RHS N167C
RHS 163B
Medium
Light greyed-
Medium
greyed-orange
orange
greyed-orange
Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.
TABLE 6
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawTen’
Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Fruiting truss
20.2
22.2
25.1
length (cm)
Fruiting truss
0.442
0.360
0.481
diameter (cm)
Number of berries
4
4
4
per fruiting
truss
Fruiting truss
Erect
Semi-erect
Semi-erect
attitude
Fruiting truss
Medium
Long
Long
length
Truss color
RHS 144A
RHS 144A
RHS 144A
Medium
Medium
Medium
yellow-
yellow-
yellow-
green
green
green
Fruit length
4.207
4.327
4.857
(cm)
Fruit width
4.289
4.431
4.603
(cm)
Fruit length/
1.0
1.0
1.1
width ratio
Fruit length/
As long as
As long as
As long as
width ratio
broad
broad
broad
Fruit weight
23.1
25.6
28.0
(g)
Relative fruit
Medium
Medium
Large
size
Predominant fruit
Conical
Conical
Conical
shape
Difference in
Slight
Slight
Slight
shape between
primary &
secondary fruits
Band without
Narrow
Narrow
Narrow
achenes
Unevenness
Weak
Between
Medium
of fruit
medium and
surface
strong
Fruit skin
RHS 45A
RHS 46A
RHS 53A
color
Dark red
Dark red
Dark red
Evenness of
Even
Even
Even
fruit color
Fruit glossiness
Medium
Medium
Between
medium and
strong
Insertion of
Level with
Above surface
Below surface
achenes
surface
Achene
RHS 185A
RHS 183C
RHS 180B
coloration-
Dark
Dark
Medium
sunward side
greyed-
greyed-
greyed-red
of berry
purple
purple
Achene coloration-
RHS 151B
RHS 152B
RHS 150B
shaded side of
Medium
medium
light yellow-
berry
yellow-green
yellow-
green
green
Achenes per berry
324
345
397
Achene weight (g)
0.00057453
0.000497336
0.000558419
Insertion of calyx
Level
Level
Level
Pose of calyx
Spreading
Reflexed
Reflexed
segments
Size of calyx
Same size
Larger
Between
in relation
smaller and
to fruit
same size
Adherence
Medium
Medium
Strong
of calyx
Firmness
Medium
Medium
Firm
of flesh
Color of the
RHS 43B
RHS 155A
RHS 155B
flesh
Medium
White and
White and
red and
RHS 41B
RHS 41A
RHS 49D
medium red
medium red
light red
Evenness of
Uneven
Slightly uneven
Slightly
flesh color
uneven
Distribution
Marginal and
Marginal and
Marginal and
of flesh color
central
central
central
Fruit hollow
2.047
2.055
2.169
length (cm)
Fruit hollow
1.610
0.774
0.738
width (cm)
Fruit hollow
1.3
2.7
2.9
length/width ratio
Hollow center
Medium
Medium
Small
Sweetness
Medium
Medium
Strong
Acidity
Medium
Medium
Weak
Texture when tasted
Medium
Medium
Fine
Time of flowering
Between early
Between early
Between early
and medium
and medium
and medium
Harvest maturity
Late March
Late March
Late March
(50% of plants
to early
to early
to early
with ripe fruit)
November
November
November
Type of bearing
Fully everbearing
Partially
Partially
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of fruit/plant
1,769
1,609
1,412
Table 7 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.
TABLE 7
‘Driscoll
Pest or Disease
‘DrisStrawTen’
Lanai’
‘San Juan’
Tetranychus urticae
Moderately
Susceptible
Moderately
(2-spotted spider
susceptible
susceptible
mite)
Botrytis fruit
Susceptible
Susceptible
Susceptible
rot
Powdery mildew
Between resistant
Susceptible
Susceptible
and moderately
resistant
Verticillium
Moderately
Moderately
Susceptible
wilt
resistant
susceptible
Viral diseases -
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
Strawberry Mottle
resistant
resistant
resistant
Virus
Xanthomonas
Moderately
Moderately
Moderately
fragariae
susceptible
susceptible
susceptible
Mowrey, Bruce D., Stewart, Philip J., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 05 2008 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023555 | /0778 | |
Nov 05 2008 | STEWART, PHILIP J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023555 | /0778 | |
Nov 07 2008 | COSS, JOANNE F | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023555 | /0778 | |
Nov 10 2008 | MADESKO, MARTIN P | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023555 | /0778 | |
Nov 12 2008 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040731 | /0326 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |