This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawSeven’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by its large, sweet tasting fruit, early harvest maturity, and resistance to powdery mildew is disclosed.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawSeven’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawSeven’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Monterey, Calif. in June, 2003 and originated from a cross between the female proprietary parent ‘77G1’ (unpatented) and the male parent ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,771). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. ‘DrisStrawSeven’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Hillsborough, Fla. for four years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photographs were taken from 5-month-old plants.
The following description of ‘DrisStrawSeven’ is based on observations taken from the 2003 to 2008 growing seasons in Hillsborough, Fla. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawSeven’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘DrisStrawSeven’ was taken from 5-month-old plants. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (RHS) (2001).
Table 1 shows selected plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of ‘Driscoll Atlantis’, (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,475) and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,298). Plant characteristics include plant height, petiolule length, stipule width, inflorescence position relative to foliage, flower size, fruit truss diameter, and fruit size.
TABLE 1
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSeven’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Plant height
20.9
19.8
20.2
(cm)
Petiolule length
1.394
1.451
1.626
(cm)
Stipule width
0.420
0.087
0.112
(cm)
Inflorescence
Above
Between above
Between beneath
position rela-
and level with
and level with
tive to foliage
Flower size
Medium
Between medium
Large
and large
Fruit truss
0.522
0.423
0.404
diameter (cm)
Fruit size
Large
Medium
Between large
and very large
Table 2 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,475) and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 16,298). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.
TABLE 2
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSeven’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Plant height
20.9
19.8
20.2
(cm)
Plant diameter
35.5
38.9
38.7
(cm)
Number of
3
3
2
crowns/plant
Habit
Flat globose
Flat globose
Flat
Density of
Medium
Medium to Dense
Medium
individual plant
Vigor
Medium
Medium
Strong
Table 3 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet margin, terminal leaflet length to width ratio and shape of leaf apex and base.
TABLE 3
Leaf
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSeven’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Terminal leaf-
7.97
7.89
8.56
let length (cm)
Terminal leaf-
7.96
8.01
8.47
let width (cm)
Terminal leaf-
1.0
1.0
1.0
let length/
width ratio
No. teeth/ter-
23
23
22
minal leaflet
Shape of teeth
Rounded
Between obtuse
Rounded
and rounded
Color of upper-
RHS 147A
RHS 137A
RHS 131B
side of leaf
Dark yellow-
Dark green
Dark green
green
Color of under-
RHS 138B
RHS 140D
RHS 142C
side of leaf
Medium green
Light green
Light green
Leaf shape
Slightly concave
Between slightly
Slightly concave
in cross section
concave and flat
Leaf blistering
Strong
Medium
Between medium
and strong
Leaf glossiness
Medium
Weak
Medium
No. leaflets
More than three
Three only
Three only
(up to 5 out of
10 leaves)
Terminal leaf-
Flat
Flat
Flat
let margin
Terminal leaf-
As long as broad
As long as broad
As long as broad
let: length/
width ratio
Terminal leaf-
Orbicular
Ovate
Between oval and
let shape
ovate
Terminal leaf-
Rounded
Obtuse
let base shape
Terminal leaf-
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
let apex shape
Table 4 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, and stipule pubescence.
TABLE 4
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSeven’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Petiole length
12.7
13.7
15.3
(cm)
Petiole
0.456
0.430
0.455
diameter (cm)
Petiole
Between medium
Dense
Medium
pubescence
and dense
Petiole pose
Between upwards
Outwards
Between
of hairs
and outwards
outwards and
downwards
Petiole color
RHS 144D Light
RHS 145C Light
RHS 145D Light
yellow-green
yellow-green
yellow-green
Petiolule color
RHS 144D Light
RHS 145C Light
RHS 145D Light
yellow-green
yellow-green
yellow-green
Petiolule length
1.394
1.451
1.626
(cm)
Petiolule dia-
0.237
0.213
0.233
meter (cm)
Bract
2
2
2
frequency
Stipule length
3.8
3.7
3.9
(cm)
Stipule width
0.420
0.087
0.112
(cm)
Stipule
Medium
Dense
Medium
pubescence
Stipule antho-
Medium
cyanin color-
ation
Table 5 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 5
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSeven’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Stolon Number
Many
Average number of
55
53
52
daughter plants
Stolon Anthocyanin
Medium
Between weak and
Strong
medium
Stolon Thickness
Medium
Medium
Medium
Stolon Pubescence
Sparse
Medium
Medium
Table 6 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, relative spacing of petals, petal apex, base and margin, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, number of petals, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, apex and margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, number of sepals, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 6
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSeven’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Inflorescence
Above
Between level
Between beneath
position rel-
with and above
and level with
ative to foliage
Flower size
Medium
Between medium
Large
and large
Flower di-
2.238
2.369
2.070
ameter (cm)
Petal shape
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Between touching
and overlapping
Petal apex
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
shape
Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Petal base
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
shape
Petal length
1.043
1.248
1.166
(cm)
Petal width
1.081
1.302
1.188
(cm)
Petal length/
As long as broad
As long as broad
As long as broad
width ratio
Typical and ob-
6
5
6
served petal
number
Petal color
RHS 155D
RHS 155C
RHS 155C
White
White
White
Calyx diameter
2.789
2.871
2.997
(cm)
Calyx diameter
Between smaller
Between same
Between same
relative to
and same size
size and larger
size and larger
corolla
Inner calyx
Same size
Same size
Larger
diameter re-
lative to outer
Sepal shape
Elliptical
Elliptical
Elliptical
Sepal apex
Convex
Convex
Convex
shape
Sepal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Sepal length
0.989
1.040
1.172
(cm)
Sepal width
0.508
0.713
0.637
(cm)
Typical and
12
11
11
observed sepal
number
Receptacle
RHS 3A
RHS 149A
RHS 149B
color
Medium yellow
Medium yellow
Medium yellow
green
green
Anther color
RHS 7A
RHS 9A
RHS 9A
Dark yellow
Dark yellow
Dark yellow
Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’. These characteristics include fruiting truss length in centimeters, fruiting truss diameter, number of berries per truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruiting truss color, fruit length in centimeters, fruit truss width in centimeters, fruit length to width ratio, fruit hollow length and width in centimeters, fruit weight in grams, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruits, band without achenes, unevenness of fruit surface, fruit skin color, evenness of fruit color, fruit glossiness, insertion of achenes, achene coloration (sunward and shaded sides of berry), insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, adherence of calyx, firmness of flesh, color of the fruit flesh, evenness of the flesh color, distribution of flesh color, hollow center, sweetness of fruit, acidity of fruit, texture of fruit when tasted, time of flowering, harvest maturity, type of bearing, grams of fruit per plant.
TABLE 7
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawSeven’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Fruiting truss
22.2
22.7
19.7
length (cm)
Fruiting truss
0.522
0.423
0.404
diameter (cm)
Number of
3
3
1
berries per
fruiting truss
Fruiting truss
Between erect
Prostrate
Prostrate
attitude
and semi-erect
Fruiting truss
RHS 144D
RHS 145B
RHS 144B
color
Light yellow
Light yellow
Light yellow
green
green
green
Fruit length
4.890
4.200
5.180
(cm)
Fruit width
3.720
3.640
4.610
(cm)
Fruit length/
1.3
1.2
1.1
width ratio
Fruit length/
Longer than
Longer than
Longer than
width ratio
broad
broad
broad
Fruit hollow
2.130
1.880
2.310
length (cm)
Fruit hollow
0.420
0.850
0.790
width (cm)
Fruit hollow
5.1
2.2
2.9
length/width
ratio
Fruit weight (g)
26.7
23.8
31.8
Relative fruit
Large
Medium
Between large
size
and very large
Predominant
Conical
Conical
Conical
fruit shape
Difference in
Slight
Slight
Slight
shape between
primary & sec-
ondary fruits
Band without
Narrow
Absent or very
Narrow
achenes
narrow
Unevenness of
Medium
Between weak
Medium
fruit surface
and medium
Fruit skin
RHS 46A
RHS 45B
RHS 43A
color
Dark red
Medium red
Medium red
Evenness of
Even
Even
Even
fruit color
Fruit glossiness
Between medium
Strong
Strong
and strong
Insertion of
Level with
Level with
Level with
achenes
surface
surface
surface
Achene color-
RHS 145A Light
RHS 151D Light
RHS 150C Light
ation - shaded
yellow-green
yellow-green
yellow-green
side of berry
Insertion of
Level
Level
Level
calyx
Pose of calyx
Spreading
Between
Between
segments
spreading and
spreading and
reflexed
reflexed
Size of calyx in
Between same
Between same
Larger
relation to
size and larger
size and larger
fruit
Adherence of
Strong
Strong
Strong
calyx
Firmness of
Between medium
Firm
Medium
flesh
and firm
Color of
RHS 40B
RHS 42B
RHS 40C
the flesh
Medium red
Medium red
Medium red
Evenness of
Between uneven
Slightly uneven
Slightly uneven
flesh color
and slightly
uneven
Distribution of
Marginal and
Marginal and
Marginal and
flesh color
central
central
central
Hollow center
Small
Medium
Medium
Sweetness
Strong
Strong
Strong
Acidity
Between weak
Medium
Medium
and medium
Texture when
Fine
Medium
Fine
tasted
Time of
Medium
Very early
Early
flowering
Harvest matur-
Early December
Late November
Late November
ity (50% of
to late April
to mid-March
to mid-March
plants with
ripe fruit)
Type of
Not everbearing
Partially
Partially
bearing
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of fruit/
402
360
448
plant
Table 8 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Atlantis’ and ‘Driscoll Sanibel’.
TABLE 8
‘Driscoll
‘Driscoll
Pest or Disease
‘DrisStrawSeven’
Atlantis’
Sanibel’
Xanthomonas
Susceptible
Moderately
Moderately
fragariae
susceptible
susceptible
Powdery mildew
Resistant
Susceptible
Susceptible
When ‘DrisStrawSeven’ is compared to the proprietary female parent ‘77G1’ (unpatented), ‘DrisStrawSeven’ is a short-day plant, whereas ‘77G1’ is a day-neutral plant.
When ‘DrisStrawSeven’ is compared to the male parent ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,771), ‘DrisStrawSeven’ is a globose plant that is not everbearing, whereas ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ is a flat globose plant that is fully everbearing. In addition, the leaf shape in cross section of ‘DrisStrawSeven’ is slightly concave and ‘DrisStrawSeven’ has more than three leaflets. The leaf shape in cross section of ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ is concave and ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ has only three leaflets. Further, the fruiting truss attitude in ‘DrisStrawSeven’ is between erect and semi-erect, whereas it is prostrate in ‘Driscoll Camarillo’.
Mowrey, Bruce D., Stewart, Philip J., Gilford, Kristie L., Pullen, Esther J., Rodriguez-Alcazar, Jorge
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 06 2008 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 15 2008 | ALCAZAR, JORGE RODRIGUEZ | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023559 | /0704 | |
Jan 02 2009 | STEWART, PHILIP J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023559 | /0704 | |
Jan 02 2009 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023559 | /0704 | |
Feb 09 2009 | GILFORD, KRISTIE L | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023559 | /0704 | |
Feb 16 2009 | PULLEN, ESTHER J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023559 | /0704 | |
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 18 2011 | RODRIGUEZ ALCAZAR, JORGE | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027643 | /0316 | |
Oct 04 2011 | STEWART, PHILIP J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027643 | /0316 | |
Oct 07 2011 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027643 | /0316 | |
Oct 18 2011 | GILFORD, KRISTIE L | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027643 | /0316 | |
Oct 31 2011 | PULLEN, ESTHER J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027643 | /0316 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040727 | /0372 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |