A new hop plant named ‘HBC 394’ is disclosed. The cones of ‘HBC 394’ mature in early September, and yield a crop of 1200 to 1600 pounds per acre. ‘HBC 394’ is used in brewing for its bittering and aromatic properties.
|
|
Genus and species: Humulus lupulus.
Variety denomination: HBC 394.
None.
‘HBC 394’ is a product of a controlled breeding program carried out by the inventor in the Yakima Valley of Washington state. ‘HBC 394’ was one of several seedlings resulting from a cross made in 1990 of female parent ‘8801-02’ (‘Hallertauer mittlefrueh’ב853-144M’) (not patented) and male parent ‘8801-01M (‘Hallertauer mittlefrueh’ב853-144M’) (not patented). A single plant of ‘HBC 394’ was selected in 1992, and in 1993 was expanded to four plants which were then planted in the area of Toppenish, Wash. The plants were observed and evaluated for several years, and in 2003 were expanded to 21 plants for further observation and evaluation in the Toppenish, Wash. area. A two acre test plot of ‘HBC 394’ was established in 2007. Throughout several generations of asexual propagation by softwood cuttings at a greenhouse facility in Yakima, Wash., ‘HBC 394’ has been observed to retain its distinctive characteristics and remain true to type. ‘HBC 394’ is distinguished from other known cultivars with hop cones containing a high alpha acid, low cohumulone acid combination. In addition, ‘HBC 394’ has a distinct citrus aromatic property.
‘HBC 394 is distinguishable from its parent plants (‘8801-02’ and ‘8801-01M.’) ‘HBC 394’ is distinguished from its male parent ‘8801-01M’, with flowers that develop into mature hop cones without producing pollen, while the flowers of ‘8801-01M’ produce pollen without developing into mature hop cones.
Table 1. sets forth some of the distinguishing characteristics of ‘HBC 394’ as compared to ‘8801- 02.’
TABLE 1
Comparison of ‘HBC 394 to ‘8801-02’
‘HBC 394
‘8801-02’
Alpha Acids %
11-13
9-11
Beta Acids %
3.4-4.5
2.5-3.5
Cohumulone %
22-24
NA
Maturity
Mid Season
Early Season
The colors in these illustrations may vary with lighting conditions and, therefore, color characteristics of this new variety should be determined with reference to the observations described herein, rather than from these illustrations alone.
The following description is based on observations made on the 16 to 17 year old plants during the 2007 and 2008 growing seasons at Toppenish, Wash. It should be understood that the characteristics described will vary somewhat depending upon cultural practices and climatic conditions, and can vary with location and season. Quantified measurements are expressed as an average of measurements taken from a number of individual plants of the new variety. The measurements of any individual plant, or any group of plants, of the new variety may vary from the stated average.
TABLE 2
Essential Oil Profile of ‘HBC 394’-Gas Chromatogram
Retention Time
Component
%
10.92
3-methyl butyl propanoate
UDL
11.56
methyl 5-methyl-hexanoate
UDL
11.79
β-pinene
0.93
12.30
myrcene
62.06
12.58
3-methyl-butyl 2-methyl-propanoate
0.19
12.78
3-methyl-butyl 3-methyl-propanoate
0.52
12.92
methyl heptanoate
0.24
13.68
sylvestrene
0.58
14.18
trans-β-ocimene
0.26
15.36
2-nonanone
UDL
15.53
6,7-epoxymyrcene
UDL
15.98
linalol
0.70
16.13
3-methyl-butyl 2-methyl-butanoate
UDL
16.23
3-methyl-butyl 3-methyl-butanoate
UDL
16.76
methyl octanoate
0.56
17.74
(e)-3-heptenyl acetate
UDL
19.45
2-decanone
UDL
20.06
methyl-4-nonenoate
UDL
20.56
methyl nonanoate
0.42
21.72
geraniol
0.48
22.44
(z)-3-octenyl acetate
UDL
22.93
(e)-3-octenyl acetate
UDL
23.08
2-undecanone
0.55
23.72
methyl-4-decenoate
2.27
23.79
methyl-4,8-decadienoate
UDL
24.18
methyl geranate
1.02
24.24
methyl decanoate
0.88
25.01
octyl 2-methyl propanoate
UDL
26.13
geranyl acetate
UDL
26.48
methyl undecanoate
UDL
26.68
α-ylangene
UDL
27.02
α-copaene
UDL
28.71
caryophyllene
8.62
28.85
α-bergamotene
UDL
29.13
(z)-β-farnesene
UDL
29.81
humulene
12.82
30.14
(e)-β-farnesene
0.16
30.30
y-muurolene + 2-tridecanone
1.08
30.51
methyl-4-dodecenoate + z,e-α-farnesene
0.18
30.63
methyl-4,8-dodecadienoate
1.75
30.87
β-selinene
UDL
30.99
cis-β-guiene
1.18
31.04
geranyl-2-methyl propanoate
UDL
31.21
α-selinene
UDL
31.49
Δ-amorphene
0.44
31.67
y-cadinene
0.72
31.81
Δ-cadinene
UDL
32.03
zonarene
UDL
32.24
trans-cadina-1(2),4-diene
UDL
32.46
α-cadinene
UDL
33.14
selina-3,7(11)-diene
UDL
33.66
caryophyllene oxide
UDL
34.40
humulene oxide epoxide II
UDL
35.04
α-cadinol
UDL
35.20
E,Z-5,7-dodecadienyl acetate
0.32
35.51
Z-5-dodecenyl acetate
0.24
35.64
9,12-octadecadienol
UDL
35.71
2-heptadecanone
UDL
37.06
farnesol (isomer unknown)
0.48
43.84
diterpene C20H32 m.w. 272
0.36
Probasco, Eugene G., Perrault, Jason
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
PP24125, | May 20 2011 | Hop Breeding Company, LLC. | Hop plant named ‘HBC 369’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 28 2008 | PROBASCO, EUGENE G | HOP BREEDING COMPANY, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022216 | /0172 | |
Jan 28 2008 | PERRAULT, JASON | HOP BREEDING COMPANY, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022216 | /0172 | |
Jan 23 2009 | Hop Breeding Company, L.L.C. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |