This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifteen’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by a flat globose plant habit, medium vigor, and medium-sized berries, is disclosed.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawFifteen’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Monterey County, Calif. in June 2004 and originated from a cross between the proprietary female parent ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and the proprietary male parent ‘38J181’ (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was first asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif.
‘DrisStrawFifteen’ was subsequently asexually propagated at the McArthur Nursery in Shasta County, Calif. and underwent further testing in Monterey County, Calif. for six years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations via stolons and tissue culture.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photographs were taken from 9½-month-old plants.
The following description of ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is based on observations taken in Monterey County, Calif. from 2004 to 2009. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic, and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ was taken from 9½-month-old plants and the botanical descriptions of the comparison varieties, ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and ‘DrisStrawNine’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 20,733), were taken from 10-month-old plants and from 9-month-old plants, respectively. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).
Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, the density of individual plants and the vigor.
TABLE 1
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFifteen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘DrisStrawNine’
Plant height (cm)
20.5
21.9
20.9
Plant diameter
37.1
47.6
32.9
(cm)
Number of
2
5.3
3
crowns/plant
Habit
Flat globose
Flat
Upright
Density of
Open
Open
Medium
individual plant
Vigor
Medium
Medium
Weak
Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upper side and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet margin, terminal leaflet length to width ratio, overall leaf shape and shape of leaf apex and base.
TABLE 2
Leaf
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFifteen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘DrisStrawNine’
Terminal leaflet
0.7
8.1
6.8
length (cm)
Terminal leaflet
0.66
7.6
7.2
width (cm)
Terminal leaflet
1.1
1.07
1.0
length/width ratio
No. teeth/
19
23.4
24
terminal leaflet
Shape of teeth
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Color of upper
RHS 136A
RHS 139A
RHS 147A
surface of leaf
(Dark green)
(Medium green)
(Dark yellow-
green)
Color of lower
RHS 147B
RHS 138B
RHS 147B
surface of leaf
(Medium yellow-
(Light green)
(Medium
green)
yellow-green)
Leaf shape in
Slightly concave
Slightly
Concave
cross section
concave to flat
Leaf blistering
Medium
Medium
Medium
Leaf glossiness
Medium
Weak
Between
medium
and strong
No. leaflets
3 only
3 only
3 only
Terminal leaflet
Revolute to flat
Revolute
Flat
margin
to flat
Terminal leaflet
As long as broad
As long as
length/width ratio
broad
Terminal leaflet
Orbicular
Orbicular
shape
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
base shape
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
apex shape
Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence and stipule anthocyanin coloration.
TABLE 3
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFifteen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘DrisStrawNine’
Petiole length (cm)
15.4
18.7
11.2
Petiole diameter
0.279
0.323
(cm)
Petiole pubescence
Medium
Medium
Dense
Petiole pose of
Outwards
Downward
Upwards
hairs
Petiole color
RHS 145A
RHS 145A
RHS 145A
(Medium
(Yellow-green)
(Medium
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Petiolule color
RHS 145A
RHS 145A
RHS 145B
(Medium
(Yellow-green)
(Medium
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Petiolule length
0.616
1.55
0.826
(cm)
Petiolule diameter
0.143
0.32
0.158
(cm)
Stipule length (cm)
3.1
3.7
3.4
Stipule width (cm)
0.891
1.2
0.823
Stipule pubescence
Medium
Medium to
Medium
Stipule
RHS 145D
dense
Absent to
anthocyanin
(Light yellow-
very weak
coloration
green)
Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 4
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFifteen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘DrisStrawNine’
Stolon number
Many
Many
Medium
Average number
40
67
35
of daughter plants
Stolon
RHS 59B
RHS 60A
Medium
anthocyanin
(Dark red-purple)
(Dark red-purple)
Stolon thickness
Medium
Medium to thick
Medium
Stolon
Dense
Dense
Sparse
pubescence
Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, time of flowering, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, relative spacing of petals, petal apex, base and margin, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, number of petals, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, apex and margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, number of sepals, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 5
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFifteen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘DrisStrawNine’
Inflorescence
Beneath
Level to above
Above
position relative
to foliage
Time of
Between early
flowering (50%
and medium
of plants at
first flower)
Flower size
Medium
Medium
Flower diameter
2.399
2.58
2.920
(cm)
Petal shape
Orbicular
Orbicular
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Overlapping
Petal apex shape
Rounded
Rounded
Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Petal base shape
Rounded
Concave-
convex
Petal length
1.310
1.21
1.257
(cm)
Petal width (cm)
1.269
1.29
1.332
Petal length/
As long as broad
As long as
As long as
width ratio
broad
broad
Petal length/
1.0
0.94
0.9
width ratio
Typical and
6
7
observed petal
number
Petal color
RHS 155B
RHS 155C
RHS 155B
(both surfaces)
(White)
(White)
(White)
Calyx diameter
3.036
3.25
3.573
(cm)
Calyx diameter
Larger
Same size
Larger
relative to
to larger
corolla
Inner calyx
Same size
Larger
Same size
diameter
relative to outer
Sepal shape
Oval
Elliptical
Sepal apex
Convex
Convex
shape
Sepal margin
Entire
Entire
Sepal length
1.176
1.480
1.318
(cm)
Sepal width
0.673
0.767
0.647
(cm)
Typical and
13
14
observed sepal
number
Receptacle
RHS 2A
RHS 2B
color
(Medium yellow)
(Medium
yellow)
Anther color
RHS 174A
RHS 22A
(Dark greyed-
(Medium
orange)
yellow-
orange)
Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. These characteristics include fruiting truss length in centimeters, fruiting truss diameter, number of berries per truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruiting truss color, fruit length in centimeters, fruit truss width in centimeters, fruit length to width ratio, fruit hollow length and width in centimeters, fruit hollow length to width ratio, fruit weight in grams, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruits, band without achenes, unevenness of fruit surface, fruit skin color, evenness of fruit color, fruit glossiness, insertion of achenes, achene coloration (sunward and shaded sides of berry) and the number of achenes per berry.
TABLE 6
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFifteen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘DrisStrawNine’
Fruiting truss
19.4
30.0
16.9
length (cm)
Fruiting truss
Between medium
length (general)
and long
Fruiting truss
0.361
0.512
diameter (cm) at
base of truss
Number of berries
5
4
per fruiting truss
Fruiting truss
Prostrate
Prostrate
Semi-erect
attitude
Fruiting truss
RHS N144C
RHS 144A
color at base
(Medium yellow-
(Medium
of truss
green)
yellow-green)
Fruit length (cm)
3.666
4.5
4.274
Fruit width (cm)
3.492
3.8
4.222
Fruit length/width
1.0
1.19
1.0
ratio
Fruit hollow
1.017
1.341
length (cm)
Fruit hollow width
0.442
1.023
(cm)
Fruit hollow
2.3
1.3
length/width ratio
Fruit weight (g)
21.6
23.3
23.1
Fruit ratio of
As long as broad
As long as
length/maximum
broad
width
Relative fruit size
Medium
Medium
Predominant fruit
Conical
Conical to
Conical
shape
ovoid
Difference in
Between slight and
Slight
Slight
shape between
moderate
primary and
secondary fruits
Band without
Narrow
Narrow to
Narrow
achenes
medium
Unevenness of
Weak
Weak
Weak
fruit surface
Fruit skin color
RHS 46A
RHS 45B
RHS 46A
(Dark red)
(Orange red)
(Dark red)
Evenness of fruit
Even
Even
Even
color
Fruit glossiness
Medium
Strong
Medium
Insertion of
Below surface
Level with
Level with
achenes
surface
surface
Achene coloration
RHS 175A
RHS 185B to
RHS 184A
(sunward side of
(Dark greyed-
RHS 154B
(Dark greyed-
berry)
orange)
(Gray purple to
purple)
yellow-green)
Achene coloration
RHS N144A
RHS 185B to
RHS 153B
(shaded side of
(Medium yellow-
RHS 154B
(Medium
berry)
green)
(Gray purple to
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Achenes per berry
324.0
300
320
Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. These characteristics include the harvest maturity, insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, adherence of calyx, firmness of flesh, color of the fruit flesh, evenness of the flesh color, distribution of flesh color, hollow center, sweetness of fruit, acidity of fruit, texture of fruit when tasted, type of bearing, grams of fruit per plant.
TABLE 7
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFifteen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘DrisStrawNine’
Harvest interval
Late March to
Late March to
Late March to
early November
early November
early November
Harvest maturity
Between early
and mid-season
Insertion of calyx
Set above fruit
Level
Level
Pose of calyx
Spreading
Spreading to
Spreading
segments
reflexed
Size of calyx in
Smaller and
Smaller
Larger
relation to fruit
larger
Adherence of calyx
Strong
Strong
Strong
Firmness of flesh
Firm
Medium
Medium
Color of the flesh
RHS N155B
RHS 47C
RHS 155C
(White) and
(Orange-red)
(White) and
RHS 46B
RHS 41A
(Dark red)
(Medium red)
Evenness of flesh
Slightly uneven
Uneven
Uneven
color
Distribution of
Marginal and
Marginal and
Marginal and
flesh color
central
central
central
Hollow center
Small
Medium
Small
Sweetness
Strong
Medium
Medium
Acidity
Medium
Medium
Medium
Texture when
Medium
Fine
Medium
tasted
Type of bearing
Fully everbearing
Partially
Fully
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of
1,513
1,679
1,505
fruit/plant
Table 8 shows pest, stress and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’.
TABLE 8
Pest, Stress, or
Disease
‘DrisStrawFifteen’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
‘DrisStrawNine’
Tetranychus urticae
Moderately
Susceptible
Moderately
susceptible
susceptible
Botrytis fruit rot
Moderately
Susceptible
Susceptible
susceptible
Powdery mildew
Moderately
Susceptible
Between
susceptible
moderately
susceptible and
susceptible
Verticillium wilt
Moderately
Moderately
Susceptible
resistant
resistant
Rain
Between
moderately
resistant
and moderately
susceptible
When ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is compared to the proprietary female parent ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145), ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is fully everbearing while ‘Driscoll Lanai’ is partially everbearing. In addition, ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ has a strong sweetness of fruit while ‘Driscoll Lanai’ has a medium sweetness of fruit. Finally, ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ has smaller fruit size (length: 3.666 cm; width: 3.492 cm) than ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (length: 4.5 cm; width: 3.8 cm).
When ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is compared to the proprietary male parent ‘38J181’ (unpatented), ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ has larger fruit and is more prone to bruising during handling than ‘38J181’.
When ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is compared to the commercial variety ‘DrisStrawNine’, the petiole pose of hairs for ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is outwards while the petiole pose of hairs for ‘DrisStrawNine’ is downward. In addition, ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is moderately resistant to Verticillium wilt while ‘DrisStrawNine’ is susceptible to Verticillium wilt.
Mowrey, Bruce D., Stewart, Philip J., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 19 2009 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 19 2009 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023705 | /0598 | |
Nov 19 2009 | COSS, JOANNE F | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023705 | /0598 | |
Nov 19 2009 | MADESKO, MARTIN P | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023705 | /0598 | |
Nov 19 2009 | STEWART, PHILIP J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023705 | /0598 | |
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040696 | /0629 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |