This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifteen’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by a flat globose plant habit, medium vigor, and medium-sized berries, is disclosed.

Patent
   PP21762
Priority
Nov 19 2009
Filed
Nov 19 2009
Issued
Mar 08 2011
Expiry
Nov 19 2029
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
65
0
n/a
1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant as described and shown herein.

Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.

Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawFifteen’.

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Monterey County, Calif. in June 2004 and originated from a cross between the proprietary female parent ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and the proprietary male parent ‘38J181’ (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was first asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif.

‘DrisStrawFifteen’ was subsequently asexually propagated at the McArthur Nursery in Shasta County, Calif. and underwent further testing in Monterey County, Calif. for six years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations via stolons and tissue culture.

The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photographs were taken from 9½-month-old plants.

FIG. 1 shows overall plant habit including fruit at various stages of development.

FIG. 2 shows leaves of the plant with three leaflets.

FIG. 3 shows both the upper side and underside of several of the flowers.

FIG. 4 shows the whole fruit.

FIG. 5 shows the fruit in longitudinal cross-section.

The following description of ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is based on observations taken in Monterey County, Calif. from 2004 to 2009. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic, and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ was taken from 9½-month-old plants and the botanical descriptions of the comparison varieties, ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and ‘DrisStrawNine’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 20,733), were taken from 10-month-old plants and from 9-month-old plants, respectively. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).

Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, the density of individual plants and the vigor.

TABLE 1
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘DrisStrawNine’
Plant height (cm) 20.5 21.9 20.9
Plant diameter 37.1 47.6 32.9
(cm)
Number of 2 5.3 3
crowns/plant
Habit Flat globose Flat Upright
Density of Open Open Medium
individual plant
Vigor Medium Medium Weak

Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upper side and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet margin, terminal leaflet length to width ratio, overall leaf shape and shape of leaf apex and base.

TABLE 2
Leaf
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘DrisStrawNine’
Terminal leaflet 0.7 8.1 6.8
length (cm)
Terminal leaflet 0.66 7.6 7.2
width (cm)
Terminal leaflet 1.1 1.07 1.0
length/width ratio
No. teeth/ 19 23.4 24
terminal leaflet
Shape of teeth Rounded Rounded Rounded
Color of upper RHS 136A RHS 139A RHS 147A
surface of leaf (Dark green) (Medium green) (Dark yellow-
green)
Color of lower RHS 147B RHS 138B RHS 147B
surface of leaf (Medium yellow- (Light green) (Medium
green) yellow-green)
Leaf shape in Slightly concave Slightly Concave
cross section concave to flat
Leaf blistering Medium Medium Medium
Leaf glossiness Medium Weak Between
medium
and strong
No. leaflets 3 only 3 only 3 only
Terminal leaflet Revolute to flat Revolute Flat
margin to flat
Terminal leaflet As long as broad As long as
length/width ratio broad
Terminal leaflet Orbicular Orbicular
shape
Terminal leaflet Rounded Rounded Rounded
base shape
Terminal leaflet Rounded Rounded
apex shape

Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence and stipule anthocyanin coloration.

TABLE 3
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘DrisStrawNine’
Petiole length (cm) 15.4 18.7 11.2
Petiole diameter 0.279 0.323
(cm)
Petiole pubescence Medium Medium Dense
Petiole pose of Outwards Downward Upwards
hairs
Petiole color RHS 145A RHS 145A RHS 145A
(Medium (Yellow-green) (Medium
yellow-green) yellow-green)
Petiolule color RHS 145A RHS 145A RHS 145B
(Medium (Yellow-green) (Medium
yellow-green) yellow-green)
Petiolule length 0.616 1.55 0.826
(cm)
Petiolule diameter 0.143 0.32 0.158
(cm)
Stipule length (cm) 3.1 3.7 3.4
Stipule width (cm) 0.891 1.2 0.823
Stipule pubescence Medium Medium to Medium
Stipule RHS 145D dense Absent to
anthocyanin (Light yellow- very weak
coloration green)

Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.

TABLE 4
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘DrisStrawNine’
Stolon number Many Many Medium
Average number 40 67 35
of daughter plants
Stolon RHS 59B RHS 60A Medium
anthocyanin (Dark red-purple) (Dark red-purple)
Stolon thickness Medium Medium to thick Medium
Stolon Dense Dense Sparse
pubescence

Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, time of flowering, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, relative spacing of petals, petal apex, base and margin, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, number of petals, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, apex and margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, number of sepals, receptacle color and anther color.

TABLE 5
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘DrisStrawNine’
Inflorescence Beneath Level to above Above
position relative
to foliage
Time of Between early
flowering (50% and medium
of plants at
first flower)
Flower size Medium Medium
Flower diameter 2.399 2.58 2.920
(cm)
Petal shape Orbicular Orbicular
Petal spacing Overlapping Overlapping Overlapping
Petal apex shape Rounded Rounded
Petal margin Entire Entire
Petal base shape Rounded Concave-
convex
Petal length 1.310 1.21 1.257
(cm)
Petal width (cm) 1.269 1.29 1.332
Petal length/ As long as broad As long as As long as
width ratio broad broad
Petal length/ 1.0 0.94 0.9
width ratio
Typical and 6 7
observed petal
number
Petal color RHS 155B RHS 155C RHS 155B
(both surfaces) (White) (White) (White)
Calyx diameter 3.036 3.25 3.573
(cm)
Calyx diameter Larger Same size Larger
relative to to larger
corolla
Inner calyx Same size Larger Same size
diameter
relative to outer
Sepal shape Oval Elliptical
Sepal apex Convex Convex
shape
Sepal margin Entire Entire
Sepal length 1.176 1.480 1.318
(cm)
Sepal width 0.673 0.767 0.647
(cm)
Typical and 13 14
observed sepal
number
Receptacle RHS 2A RHS 2B
color (Medium yellow) (Medium
yellow)
Anther color RHS 174A RHS 22A
(Dark greyed- (Medium
orange) yellow-
orange)

Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. These characteristics include fruiting truss length in centimeters, fruiting truss diameter, number of berries per truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruiting truss color, fruit length in centimeters, fruit truss width in centimeters, fruit length to width ratio, fruit hollow length and width in centimeters, fruit hollow length to width ratio, fruit weight in grams, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruits, band without achenes, unevenness of fruit surface, fruit skin color, evenness of fruit color, fruit glossiness, insertion of achenes, achene coloration (sunward and shaded sides of berry) and the number of achenes per berry.

TABLE 6
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘DrisStrawNine’
Fruiting truss 19.4 30.0 16.9
length (cm)
Fruiting truss Between medium
length (general) and long
Fruiting truss 0.361 0.512
diameter (cm) at
base of truss
Number of berries 5 4
per fruiting truss
Fruiting truss Prostrate Prostrate Semi-erect
attitude
Fruiting truss RHS N144C RHS 144A
color at base (Medium yellow- (Medium
of truss green) yellow-green)
Fruit length (cm) 3.666 4.5 4.274
Fruit width (cm) 3.492 3.8 4.222
Fruit length/width 1.0 1.19 1.0
ratio
Fruit hollow 1.017 1.341
length (cm)
Fruit hollow width 0.442 1.023
(cm)
Fruit hollow 2.3 1.3
length/width ratio
Fruit weight (g) 21.6 23.3 23.1
Fruit ratio of As long as broad As long as
length/maximum broad
width
Relative fruit size Medium Medium
Predominant fruit Conical Conical to Conical
shape ovoid
Difference in Between slight and Slight Slight
shape between moderate
primary and
secondary fruits
Band without Narrow Narrow to Narrow
achenes medium
Unevenness of Weak Weak Weak
fruit surface
Fruit skin color RHS 46A RHS 45B RHS 46A
(Dark red) (Orange red) (Dark red)
Evenness of fruit Even Even Even
color
Fruit glossiness Medium Strong Medium
Insertion of Below surface Level with Level with
achenes surface surface
Achene coloration RHS 175A RHS 185B to RHS 184A
(sunward side of (Dark greyed- RHS 154B (Dark greyed-
berry) orange) (Gray purple to purple)
yellow-green)
Achene coloration RHS N144A RHS 185B to RHS 153B
(shaded side of (Medium yellow- RHS 154B (Medium
berry) green) (Gray purple to yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Achenes per berry 324.0 300 320

Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’. These characteristics include the harvest maturity, insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, adherence of calyx, firmness of flesh, color of the fruit flesh, evenness of the flesh color, distribution of flesh color, hollow center, sweetness of fruit, acidity of fruit, texture of fruit when tasted, type of bearing, grams of fruit per plant.

TABLE 7
Characteristic ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘DrisStrawNine’
Harvest interval Late March to Late March to Late March to
early November early November early November
Harvest maturity Between early
and mid-season
Insertion of calyx Set above fruit Level Level
Pose of calyx Spreading Spreading to Spreading
segments reflexed
Size of calyx in Smaller and Smaller Larger
relation to fruit larger
Adherence of calyx Strong Strong Strong
Firmness of flesh Firm Medium Medium
Color of the flesh RHS N155B RHS 47C RHS 155C
(White) and (Orange-red) (White) and
RHS 46B RHS 41A
(Dark red) (Medium red)
Evenness of flesh Slightly uneven Uneven Uneven
color
Distribution of Marginal and Marginal and Marginal and
flesh color central central central
Hollow center Small Medium Small
Sweetness Strong Medium Medium
Acidity Medium Medium Medium
Texture when Medium Fine Medium
tasted
Type of bearing Fully everbearing Partially Fully
everbearing everbearing
Grams of 1,513 1,679 1,505
fruit/plant

Table 8 shows pest, stress and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘DrisStrawNine’.

TABLE 8
Pest, Stress, or
Disease ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘DrisStrawNine’
Tetranychus urticae Moderately Susceptible Moderately
susceptible susceptible
Botrytis fruit rot Moderately Susceptible Susceptible
susceptible
Powdery mildew Moderately Susceptible Between
susceptible moderately
susceptible and
susceptible
Verticillium wilt Moderately Moderately Susceptible
resistant resistant
Rain Between
moderately
resistant
and moderately
susceptible

When ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is compared to the proprietary female parent ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145), ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is fully everbearing while ‘Driscoll Lanai’ is partially everbearing. In addition, ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ has a strong sweetness of fruit while ‘Driscoll Lanai’ has a medium sweetness of fruit. Finally, ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ has smaller fruit size (length: 3.666 cm; width: 3.492 cm) than ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (length: 4.5 cm; width: 3.8 cm).

When ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is compared to the proprietary male parent ‘38J181’ (unpatented), ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ has larger fruit and is more prone to bruising during handling than ‘38J181’.

When ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is compared to the commercial variety ‘DrisStrawNine’, the petiole pose of hairs for ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is outwards while the petiole pose of hairs for ‘DrisStrawNine’ is downward. In addition, ‘DrisStrawFifteen’ is moderately resistant to Verticillium wilt while ‘DrisStrawNine’ is susceptible to Verticillium wilt.

Mowrey, Bruce D., Stewart, Philip J., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
ER1136,
ER1281,
ER1840,
ER1902,
ER1967,
ER2330,
ER2362,
ER2487,
ER2617,
ER2850,
ER2853,
ER2995,
ER2996,
ER313,
ER3157,
ER3345,
ER367,
ER3795,
ER3852,
ER3927,
ER4121,
ER4280,
ER4296,
ER4472,
ER5037,
ER51,
ER5256,
ER5406,
ER5882,
ER6311,
ER6331,
ER6770,
ER6873,
ER7167,
ER7221,
ER7256,
ER7494,
ER7669,
ER778,
ER7959,
ER8,
ER8071,
ER8327,
ER8550,
ER8608,
ER8655,
ER8731,
ER9427,
ER9485,
ER9635,
ER964,
ER9757,
ER9999,
PP27645, Mar 06 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’
PP27682, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’
PP27711, Apr 10 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’
PP27813, Jul 15 2015 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’
PP29289, Mar 25 2016 DRISCOLL S, INC Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’
PP29728, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’
PP29729, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’
PP29730, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’
PP29731, Jun 26 2017 Driscoll's Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’
PP29747, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’
PP29748, Jun 27 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’
PP29749, Jun 06 2017 Driscoll's, Inc. Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’
Patent Priority Assignee Title
///////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 19 2009Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Nov 19 2009MOWREY, BRUCE D Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0237050598 pdf
Nov 19 2009COSS, JOANNE F Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0237050598 pdf
Nov 19 2009MADESKO, MARTIN P Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0237050598 pdf
Nov 19 2009STEWART, PHILIP J Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0237050598 pdf
Dec 23 2010DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC ,AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST0255250237 pdf
Sep 30 2016Driscoll Strawberry Associates, IncDRISCOLL S, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0406960629 pdf
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule