This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFourteen’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by a medium density plant with medium vigor, medium-sized fruit having a large hollow center, and a partially everbearing habit, is disclosed.
|
|
Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.
Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawFourteen’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Monterey County, Calif. in May 2005 and originated from a cross between the proprietary female parent ‘159K312’ (unpatented) and the proprietary male parent ‘128K296’ (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was first asexually propagated by stolons or tissue culture at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif.
‘DrisStrawFourteen’ was subsequently asexually propagated in Shasta County, Calif. and underwent further testing in Monterey County, Calif. for five years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations via stolons and tissue culture.
The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photographs were taken from 9-month-old plants.
The following description of ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ is based on observations taken in Monterey County, Calif. from 2005 to 2009. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic, and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ was taken from 9-month-old plants and the botanical descriptions of the comparison varieties, ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899) and ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145), were taken from 10-month-old plants and from 8-month-old plants, respectively. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (RHS) (2001).
Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties ‘San Juan’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, the density of individual plants and the vigor.
TABLE 1
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Plant height (cm)
24.9
23.6
22.8
Plant diameter (cm)
39.6
44.2
40.1
Number of crowns/
3
2
2
plant
Habit
Globose
Globose
Globose
Density of
Medium
Dense
Medium
individual plant
Vigor
Medium
Strong
Medium
Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘San Juan’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upper side and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet margin, terminal leaflet length to width ratio, overall leaf shape and shape of leaf apex and base.
TABLE 2
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Leaf
Characteristic
Terminal leaflet
7.6
7.4
7.2
length (cm)
Terminal leaflet
0.84
0.74
0.69
width (cm)
Terminal leaflet
0.9
1.0
1.0
length/width ratio
No. teeth/
28
21
20
terminal leaflet
Characteristic
Shape of teeth
Obtuse
Rounded
Rounded
Color of upper
RHS 147A
RHS 139A
RHS 147A
surface of leaf
(Dark yellow-
(Dark green)
(Dark yellow-
green)
green)
Color of lower
RHS 148B
RHS 147B
RHS 148C
surface of leaf
(Medium
(Medium
(Medium
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Leaf shape in
Slightly
Slightly
Flat
cross section
concave
concave
Leaf blistering
Medium
Medium
Medium
Leaf glossiness
Medium
Medium
Medium
No. leaflets
3 only
3 only
3 only
Terminal leaflet
Flat
Revolute to
Revolute to
margin
flat
flat
Terminal leaflet
As long as
As long as
As long as
length/width ratio
broad
broad
broad
Terminal leaflet
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
shape
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
base shape
Terminal leaflet
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
apex shape
Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘San Juan’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence and stipule anthocyanin coloration.
TABLE 3
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Petiole length
13.8
16.3
14.4
(cm)
Petiole diameter
0.333
0.314
0.280
(cm)
Petiole
Sparse
Medium
Medium
pubescence
Petiole pose
Upwards to
Outwards
Between
of hairs
downwards
upwards
and outwards
Petiole color
RHS 144B
RHS 146B
RHS 144C
(Medium
(Medium
(Medium
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Petiolule color
RHS 144B
RHS 146C
RHS 144C
(Medium
(Medium
(Medium
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Petiolule length
7.21
8.63
12.26
(mm)
Petiolule
0.165
0.170
0.145
diameter (cm)
Bract frequency
1
1
0
Stipule length
3.8
3.3
3.3
(cm)
Stipule width
0.694
0.929
0.897
(cm)
Stipule
Dense
Medium
Dense
pubescence
Stipule
RHS 145D
RHS 149D
RHS 149D
anthocyanin
(Light
(Light
(Light
coloration
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘San Juan’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.
TABLE 4
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Stolon number
Medium
Between
Many
medium
and many
Average number
30+
57
67
of daughter plants
Stolon
RHS 60C
RHS 59A
RHS 60A
anthocyanin
(Dark red-
(Dark red-
(Dark red-
purple)
purple)
purple)
Stolon thickness
Medium
Medium
Between
medium
and thick
Stolon pubescence
Medium
Medium
Dense
Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘San Juan’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, time of flowering, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, relative spacing of petals, petal apex, base and margin, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, number of petals, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, apex and margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, number of sepals, receptacle color and anther color.
TABLE 5
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Inflorescence
Level with
Beneath
Level with
position
relative to foliage
Time of flowering
Between
Between
Between
(50% of plants
early and
early and
early and
at first flower)
medium
medium
medium
Flower size
Medium
Medium
Medium
Flower diameter
2.430
2.792
2.540
(cm)
Petal shape
Orbicular
Orbicular
Orbicular
Petal spacing
Overlapping
Overlapping
Overlapping
Petal apex shape
Rounded
Rounded
Rounded
Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Petal base shape
Concave-
Concave-
Rounded
convex
convex
Petal length (cm)
1.216
1.347
1.221
Petal width (cm)
1.149
1.469
1.285
Petal length/
As long as
As long as
As long as
width ratio
broad
broad
broad
Petal length/
1.1
0.9
1.0
width ratio
Typical and
6
6
7
observed petal
number
Petal color
RHS 155C
RHS 155D
RHS 155B
(White)
(White)
(White)
Calyx diameter
3.444
3.631
3.228
(cm)
Calyx diameter
Larger
Larger
Larger
relative to corolla
Inner calyx
Same size
Same size
Same size
diameter relative
to outer
Sepal shape
Oval
Oval
Oval
Sepal apex shape
Convex
Convex
Convex
Sepal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire
Sepal length (cm)
1.369
1.461
1.150
Sepal width (cm)
0.681
0.767
0.461
Typical and
13
13
13
observed sepal
number
Receptacle color
RHS 2A
RHS 151A
RHS N144B
(Medium yellow)
(Medium
(Medium
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Anther color
RHS 152B
RHS 178A
RHS 163A
(Medium
(Dark greyed-
(Medium
yellow-green)
red)
greyed-orange)
Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘San Juan’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. These characteristics include fruiting truss length in centimeters, fruiting truss diameter, number of berries per truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruiting truss color, fruit length in centimeters, fruit truss width in centimeters, fruit length to width ratio, fruit hollow length and width in centimeters, fruit hollow length to width ratio, fruit weight in grams, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruits, band without achenes, unevenness of fruit surface, fruit skin color, evenness of fruit color, fruit glossiness, insertion of achenes, achene coloration (sunward and shaded sides of berry) and the number of achenes per berry.
TABLE 6
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Fruiting truss
18.8
22.8
17.2
length (cm)
Fruiting truss
Medium
Between
Medium
length (general)
medium
and long
Fruiting truss
0.429
0.391
0.327
diameter (cm) at
base of truss
Number of berries
4
4
4
per fruiting truss
Fruiting truss
Prostrate
Prostrate
Prostrate
attitude
Fruiting truss
RHS 144A
RHS 144A
RHS 144A
color at base
(Medium
(Medium
(Medium
of truss
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Fruit length (cm)
4.149
4.349
3.752
Fruit width (cm)
3.840
3.784
3.683
Fruit length/
1.1
1.1
1.0
width ratio
Fruit hollow
2.139
1.837
1.222
length (cm)
Fruit hollow
0.716
0.538
0.424
width (cm)
Fruit hollow
3.0
3.4
2.9
length/width ratio
Fruit weight (g)
29.1
25.4
24.9
Fruit ratio of
As long as
As long as
As long as
length/maximum
broad
broad
broad
width
Relative fruit size
Medium
Medium
Medium
Predominant
Conical
Conical
Conical and
fruit shape
almost
cylindrical
Difference in shape
Slight
Slight
Slight
between primary
and secondary fruits
Band without
Absent or very
Broad
Narrow
achenes
narrow
Unevenness of
Weak
Medium
Weak
fruit surface
Fruit skin color
RHS 46B
RHS 46A
RHS 46A
(Dark red)
(Dark red)
(Dark red)
Evenness of
Even
Slightly
Even
fruit color
uneven
Fruit glossiness
Medium
Medium
Medium
Insertion of
Below surface
Level with
Above surface
achenes
to above surface
surface
Achene coloration
RHS 185A
RHS 183C
RHS 176A
(sunward side of
(Dark greyed-
(Dark greyed-
(Dark greyed-
berry)
purple)
purple)
orange)
Achene coloration
RHS N144B
RHS 152C
RHS 152C
(shaded side of
(Medium
(Medium
(Medium
berry)
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
yellow-green)
Achenes per berry
340.6
273.4
294.5
Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘San Juan’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’. These characteristics include the harvest maturity, insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, adherence of calyx, firmness of flesh, color of the fruit flesh, evenness of the flesh color, distribution of flesh color, hollow center, sweetness of fruit, acidity of fruit, texture of fruit when tasted, type of bearing, grams of fruit per plant.
TABLE 7
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Harvest
Late March
Late March
Late March
interval
to early
to early
to early
November
November
November
Harvest
Late
Between
Between
maturity
early and
early and
mid-season
mid-season
Insertion of
Level
Set above
Level
calyx
fruit
Pose of calyx
Reflexed
Reflexed
Reflexed
segments
Size of calyx
From same
Same size
From same
in relation to
size to
size to
fruit
larger
larger
Adherence of
Strong
Strong
Medium
calyx
Firmness of
Firm
Medium
Medium
flesh
Color of
RHS 155D
RHS 155B
RHS 155C
the flesh
(White) and
(White) and
(White) and
RHS 43B
RHS 43A
RHS 46A
(Medium red)
(Medium red)
(Dark red)
Evenness of
Slightly
Slightly
Slightly
flesh color
uneven
uneven
uneven
Distribution
Marginal
Marginal
Marginal
of flesh color
and central
and central
and central
Hollow center
Large
Small
Small
Sweetness
Medium
Medium
Medium
Acidity
Medium
Medium
Medium
Texture when
Medium
Medium
Medium
tasted
Type of bearing
Partially
Partially
Partially
everbearing
everbearing
everbearing
Grams of fruit/
1,463
1,303
1,699
plant
Table 8 shows pest, stress and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘San Juan’ and ‘Driscoll Lanai’.
TABLE 8
Pest, Stress,
or Disease
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Botrytis
Moderately
Susceptible
Susceptible
fruit rot
resistant
Powdery
Between resistant
Susceptible
Susceptible
mildew
and moderately
resistant
Verticillium
Moderately
Susceptible
Moderately
wilt
resistant
susceptible
Rain
Between resistant
Between resistant
Moderately
and moderately
and moderately
resistant
resistant
resistant
When ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ is compared to the proprietary female parent ‘159K312’ (unpatented), ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ has larger fruit and better organic performance than does ‘159K312 ’ .
When ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ is compared to the proprietary male parent ‘128K296’ (unpatented), ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ has larger fruit and better organic performance than does ‘128K296’.
When ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ is compared to the commercial variety ‘San Juan’, ‘DrisStrawFourteen’ has softer but more fruit in the second half of the season than does ‘San Juan’.
Table 9 shows selected plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899) and ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145). Plant characteristics include terminal leaflet margin profile, insertion of achenes, and fruit production.
TABLE 9
Characteristic
‘DrisStrawFourteen’
‘San Juan’
‘Driscoll Lanai’
Terminal leaflet
Flat
Revolute
Revolute
margin profile
to flat
to flat
Insertion of
Below surface to
Level with
Above
achenes
above surface
surface
surface
Fruit production,
1,463
1,303
1,699
grams/plant
Mowrey, Bruce D., Stewart, Philip J., Madesko, Martin P., Coss, JoAnne F.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
ER1136, | |||
ER1281, | |||
ER1840, | |||
ER1902, | |||
ER1967, | |||
ER2330, | |||
ER2362, | |||
ER2487, | |||
ER2617, | |||
ER2850, | |||
ER2853, | |||
ER2995, | |||
ER2996, | |||
ER313, | |||
ER3157, | |||
ER3345, | |||
ER367, | |||
ER3795, | |||
ER3852, | |||
ER3927, | |||
ER4121, | |||
ER4280, | |||
ER4296, | |||
ER4472, | |||
ER5037, | |||
ER51, | |||
ER5256, | |||
ER5406, | |||
ER5882, | |||
ER6311, | |||
ER6331, | |||
ER6770, | |||
ER6873, | |||
ER7167, | |||
ER7221, | |||
ER7256, | |||
ER7494, | |||
ER7669, | |||
ER778, | |||
ER7959, | |||
ER8, | |||
ER8071, | |||
ER8327, | |||
ER8550, | |||
ER8608, | |||
ER8655, | |||
ER8731, | |||
ER9427, | |||
ER9485, | |||
ER9635, | |||
ER964, | |||
ER9757, | |||
ER9999, | |||
PP27645, | Mar 06 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyFive’ |
PP27682, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortyNine’ |
PP27711, | Apr 10 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySix’ |
PP27813, | Jul 15 2015 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFortySeven’ |
PP29289, | Mar 25 2016 | DRISCOLL S, INC | Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawFifty’ |
PP29728, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySeven’ |
PP29729, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyTwo’ |
PP29730, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyOne’ |
PP29731, | Jun 26 2017 | Driscoll's Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftySix’ |
PP29747, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFive’ |
PP29748, | Jun 27 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyFour’ |
PP29749, | Jun 06 2017 | Driscoll's, Inc. | Strawberry plant variety named ‘DrisStrawFiftyThree’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 02 2009 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 03 2009 | STEWART, PHILIP J | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023705 | /0676 | |
Nov 04 2009 | MOWREY, BRUCE D | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023705 | /0676 | |
Nov 04 2009 | COSS, JOANNE F | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023705 | /0676 | |
Nov 04 2009 | MADESKO, MARTIN P | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023705 | /0676 | |
Dec 23 2010 | DRISCOLL STRAWBERRY ASSOCIATES INC , | AMERICAN AGCREDIT, PCA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | GRANT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST | 025525 | /0237 | |
Sep 30 2016 | Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc | DRISCOLL S, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040696 | /0627 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |