‘FairchildLS’ is a mid-season maturing diploid mandarin that combines medium-large sized fruit of excellent quality and production, with low seed content even in mixed plantings. It would likely be successful in the mid to late-season marketing window that currently has very few low seeded cultivars.
|
1. A new and distinct mandarin tree having the characteristics substantially as described and illustrated herein.
|
Latin name of the genus and species: The mandarin cultivar of this invention is botanically identified as Citrus reticulata.
Variety denomination: The variety denomination is ‘FairchildLS’.
This invention relates to a new and distinctive mandarin cultivar designated ‘FairchildLS’, which was developed at Riverside, Calif. and derived from an irradiated bud of ‘Fairchild’ mandarin. ‘Fairchild’ mandarin was produced by J. R. Furr in Indio, Calif. from a conventional hybridization of 2n Clementine ‘Algerian’ mandarin×2n ‘Orlando’ tangelo (itself a hybrid of ‘Duncan’ grapefruitבDancy’ mandarin produced in Florida). ‘Fairchild’ was released in 1964.
Irradiation of budwood of ‘Fairchild’ mandarin, taken from registered trees in Lindcove, Calif., was accomplished in June, 1997 at Riverside using 50 Gray units of gamma irradiation from a Cobalt-60 irradiation source. Buds from this irradiation were propagated onto various rootstocks in the greenhouse at Riverside where they were grown to field-plantable-sized trees. These trees were planted in June 1998 at Riverside. Fruit production and evaluation on these trees began in 2001. One selection from this irradiated population (propagated on Carrizo citrange rootstock) distinguished itself from the others in having very low seed counts in comparison to the original ‘Fairchild’ cultivar, as well as having the excellent fruit quality and normal fruit production characteristics of the ‘Fairchild’ parent (see,
‘FairchildLS’ is a mid-season maturing diploid mandarin that combines medium-large sized fruit of excellent quality and production, with low seed content even in mixed plantings. It would likely be successful in the mid to late-season marketing window that currently has very few low seeded cultivars.
The Figures depict various characteristics of ‘FairchildLS’.
‘FairchildLS’ is a mandarin selection developed at Riverside, Calif. from an irradiated bud of the diploid mandarin cultivar ‘Fairchild’, which is a mid-season maturing variety. Evaluation of ‘FairchildLS’ began on the original tree at Riverside in 2001 and has continued annually until the present. Tree size, growth, as well as fruit production and fruit quality characteristics, have been compared in these evaluations to ‘Fairchild’ mandarin from the same field block. Three, four and five-year-old ‘FairchildLS’ trees in trials at Riverside, Irvine, Arvin, Lindcove, Oasis and Woodlake have also been evaluated from two to four years of fruiting (see Tables 1 and 2).
‘FairchildLS’ distinguishes itself by being low seeded (2.4 seeds/fruit) in all situations of cross-pollination, differing from ‘Fairchild’, which will have up to 15-25 seeds/fruit in cross-pollinated situations. In Riverside, Calif. ‘FairchildLS’ matures in winter, typically early January, and holds its fruit quality characteristics through late March. Fruit size is moderately large (64 mm in diameter) averaging 110 grams per fruit. Fruit are deeply oblate in shape with a deep orange rind color and a moderately smooth rind texture. Flesh color is deep orange and finely textured, and the fruit are moderately easy to peel. Fruit are juicy, with a rich, sweet flavor when mature. Tree growth habit is rounded, producing a dense, compact tree crown with excellent production commencing in the third year after planting. ‘FairchildLS’, like its parent ‘Fairchild’, may need a pollinizer for best production. ‘FairchildLS’ is well adapted to growing in all California climate zones normally associated with citrus, including hot desert areas (where maturity and marketing occur in November-December), which is a rare and distinct advantage for a mandarin. Alternate bearing does exist, but can be controlled with appropriate cultural practices.
‘FairchildLS’ mandarin can be grown according to accepted cultural practices for most mandarin varieties, including planting densities of 180-300 trees per acre, normal fertilization and pest control practices, and the use of standard rootstocks for mandarins. Pruning is not normally necessary since the normal growth habit of the tree results in a dense, compact crown. However, selective interior pruning may enhance production and health of the tree if applied after the second year of full fruit production and regularly thereafter. Other rootstocks adapted to more marginal growing conditions of salinity, high pH or very heavy soils, including the lemon types C. macrophylla, Volkameriana, and rough lemon, may be useful in those conditions but overall fruit quality would likely be affected negatively. Sour orange or mandarin type rootstocks such as Cleopatra might be more suitable in these marginal conditions since fruit quality would not be affected to the extent the lemon-type rootstocks impart.
Comparison with Existing Mandarins
Mid to late season maturing mandarin cultivars in production include ‘Fairchild’ mandarin (the original cultivar from which ‘FairchildLS’ was derived), ‘Murcott’ tangor, ‘Fortune’ mandarin, ‘Ortanique’ tangor, ‘Page’ mandarin ‘Temple’ tangor, as well as late-maturing Clementina selections including ‘Hernandina’ and ‘Nour’, ‘Dancy’ mandarin and ‘Minneola’ tangelo. All of these cultivars will be seedy if grown in the presence of a pollenizer. Some, including the Clementina selections, ‘Fortune’, ‘Ortanique’ and ‘Page’ mandarins will have few seeds if no pollinizer is present. Recently released mid and mid-late season cultivars that are very low-seeded include ‘Tango’ mandarin, ‘Gold Nugget’, ‘TDE2’ mandarin hybrid (Shasta Gold®) ‘TDE3’ mandarin hybrid (Tahoe Gold®), and ‘TDE4’ mandarin hybrid (Yosemite Gold®) and ‘DaisySL’ mandarin. ‘FairchildLS’ differs from these cultivars in being slightly earlier maturing and better adapted to hot desert climates than all but ‘DaisySL’. Trees of ‘FairchildLS’ tend to be smaller than all the other varieties except ‘DaisySL’. Additional differences (summarized in Table 6) distinguish it from each of these cultivars.
‘FairchildLS’ mandarin exhibits low seed numbers (2.4 seeds per fruit) in all fruit under all conditions of cross-pollination. Additionally, preliminary evaluations indicate that pollen from ‘FairchildLS’ has reduced germination rates in culture (˜25%) and is therefore likely to reduce the tendency to cause seeds in other mandarins, causing few seeds in selected Clementine mandarin and ‘W. Murcott’ mandarin cultivars when hand pollinated onto those selections. A comparison of ‘FairchildLS’ with other low-seeded late-season mandarins is provided in Table 6 below. ‘FairchildLS’ is distinctive and superior in having a very wide climatic growing area, somewhat less alternate bearing, and fruit appearance that may be preferred in some markets.
The Royal Horticultural Society (R.H.S.) color numbering system is used herein for the color description of the rind, seed, bark, leaf, flower, flesh color and other interest of the ‘FairchildLS’ mandarin cultivar.
Trees, Foliage, and Flowers
Tree size and growth characteristics of ‘FairchildLS’ have been consistent with ‘Fairchild’ throughout the evaluations. Growth of both the ‘Fairchild’ and the ‘FairchildLS’ selection has been generally rounded and somewhat spreading in the first four years, followed by a tendency to grow into a more compact, dense rounded crown in ensuing years. The eleven-year-old ‘FairchildLS’ “mother” tree at Riverside on Carrizo citrange rootstock is 2.7 m high and 3.0 m wide with a rounded, compact growth habit yielding a canopy volume of 12.72 m3 (
Leaves of ‘FairchildLS’ are lanceolate in shape and concave in cross section. They have an acute apex with weak emargination and an acute base, and are dark-green in color (
Flowers of ‘FairchildLS’ are hermaphroditic with whitish petals (RHS Greenish White 157D) on both upper and lower surfaces, and yellowish (RHS Yellow 13C) anthers and are borne in clusters (
TABLE 1
Tree, leaf, flower and seed characteristics of ‘FairchildLS’ mandarin
(for nine- to eleven-year-old tree or five-year-old tree)
1.
Tree height (on Carrizo rootstock)
2.7 m
2.
Crown diameter
3.0 m
3.
Crown shape
Round, compact
4.
Scion circumference/rootstock
38.5 cm/55.0 cm
circumference Ion Carrizo rootstock
measurement taken at 15 cm above
soil surface)
5.
Scion circumference/rootstock
37.0 cm/53.0 cm
circumference (on C35 rootstock)
6.
Bud-union characteristics
Slightly benched*
(citranges)
7.
Rootstock-scion compatibility
Excellent (with citranges)
8.
Tree vigor
Moderately vigorous
9.
Bark color
RHS Grey-Brown 199A
10.
Leaf shape
Lanceolate
11.
Leaf cross-section
Concave
12.
Leaf blade length
80.8 mm
13.
Leaf blade width
25.5 mm
14.
Leaf apex
Acute with weak emargination
15.
Leaf base
Acute
16.
Leaf margins
Very slightly crenate
17.
Leaf abaxial color
RHS Green 137A
18.
Leaf adaxial color
RHS Green 143A
19.
Petiole length
10.6 mm ± 0.9
20.
Petiole width
1.6 mm
21.
Petiole wings
Absent
22.
Petiole color
RHS Green 137A
23.
Thorniness
Not present
24.
Inflorescence type
Clustered
25.
Flowering habit
Flowers once per year
26.
Flower size
13.0 mm (medium)
27.
Flower structure
Complete
28.
Petal color
RHS Greenish white 157D
29.
Anther color
RHS Yellow 13C
30.
Pollen viability
Low (25-35%)
(germination in culture)
31.
Pollen color
RHS Yellow 13C
32.
Scion diameter/rootstock
12 cm/18 cm
diameter (on Carrizo rootstock
measurement taken at 15 cm above
soil surface)
*The term “benched” means that the scion diameter is considerably less than the rootstock diameter and that the angle of the tissue across the bud union is greater than 45°.
TABLE 1.1
Flower characteristics of ‘FairchildLS’ mandarin
(for nine- to eleven-year-old tree or five-year-old tree)
Characteristics
Mean
SD
petal number
5
0
petal length
13.7
mm
0.55
mm
petal width
5.5
mm
0.049
mm
petal shape
elliptic
petal apex shape
obtuse
petal base shape
truncate
petal margin
entire
bud length
12.2
mm
0.24
mm
bud diameter
5.7
mm
0.043
mm
bud shape
linear
bud color
155D
sepal number
5
0
sepal length - free
1.66
mm
0.11
mm
sepal width
2.13
mm
0.22
mm
Sepal shape (nonfused portion)
Deltoid
Sepal apex
acute
Sepal margin
entire
Sepal color - abaxial
1D
Sepal color - adaxial
1D
Fruiting, Fruit and Production Characteristics
Fruit of ‘FairchildLS’ are deeply oblate in shape with no neck. The fruit has a slightly concave basal end (moderately depressed) with a truncate (slightly depressed) distal end and a non-persistent style. The fruit is medium sized for a mandarin (classified as Large by State of California standards), averaging 64 mm in diameter and 56 mm in height. The fruit further has a smooth, deep orange rind color (RHS Orange N25B) and relatively inconspicuous, slightly depressed oil glands. The rind is of medium adherence at maturity and relatively thin, averaging 3.5 mm in thickness, which makes the fruit only moderately easy to peel. The fruit interior has a moderately fine flesh texture with 11-12 segments and a semi-hollow axis of medium size at maturity. The fruit are juicy, averaging 47% juice and average 110 g in weight. Fruit from trees on Carrizo citrange rootstocks averaged 12.1-13.0% soluble solids and 0.85-1.17% acid in January at four trial locations in California with soluble solids increasing to 13.2-14.5%, and acid decreasing to 0.76-0.93% by mid-March (Table 5). Fruit from trees on C35 citrange rootstocks averaged 11.2-12.8% soluble solids and 0.94-1.23% acid in January at four trial locations in California with soluble solids increasing to 13.1-14.0% and acid decreasing to 0.78-1.01% by mid-March. Fruit average 2.4±0.6 seeds per fruit in the presence of substantial cross-pollination pressure at all trial locations (summarized from Table 4). Seeds, when present, are polyembryonic, with a slightly yellowish-white outer seed coat (RHS Yellow-White 158A), a grayish-orange (RHS Greyed-Orange 164C) inner seed coat, and grayish-yellow (RHS Greyed-Yellow 160C) colyledons.
Fruit production of ‘FairchildLS’ begins in the third year after planting, which is similar to ‘Fairchild’. Fruit production on four-year-old trees averaged 28.0-49.2 kg, and on five-year-old trees averaged 41.6-64.7 kg at the fruiting trial sites (
Fruit storage trials included storage of washed but not waxed fruit at 5.6° C. for up to 45 days with fruit samples taken every 15 days for analysis. Data indicates that the storage characteristics of ‘FairchildLS’ are very good with no measureable loss of rind quality or color, no significant loss in juice quality or deterioration in taste, and no significant indication of fungal or other disease problems over the 45 day storage period.
TABLE 2
Fruit characteristics of ‘FairchildLS’ mandarin at maturity
1.
Fruit shape
Deep oblate
2.
Fruit diameter
64.0 mm ± 3.3
3.
Fruit height
56.1 mm ± 2.3
4.
Aspect ratio (height/diameter)
0.88
5.
Fruit: shape of basal end
Slightly concave (flattened at stem)
6.
Fruit: shape of distal end
Truncate (slightly depressed)
7.
Fruit: distal end areola
Present but faint (18.8 mm in
diameter)
8.
Fruit neck
Not present
9.
Style
Not persistent
10.
Rind texture
Moderately smooth
11.
Oil glands
Slightly conspicuous, slightly
depressed
12.
Rind Color
RHS Orange N25B
13.
Rind thickness
3.5 mm
14.
Albedo thickness
1.5 mm
15.
Albedo color
RHS Yellow-Orange 23C
16.
Rind adherence
Medium
17.
Rind separation
Slight
18.
Flesh (pulp) color
RHS Orange-Red N30D
19.
Flesh (pulp) texture
Moderately fine
20.
Number of segments
11-12
21.
Axis: structure
Semi-hollow
22.
Axis: size
Medium
23.
Navel presence
Not present
24.
# Seeds/fruit (mean)
2.4 ± 0.6 (cross-pollinated
conditions)
25.
Seed embryony
Polyembryonic
26.
Seed coat color
Yellow-White 158A
27.
Seed cotyledon color
Greyed-Yellow 160C
28.
Seed inner coat color
Greyed-Orange 164C
29.
Fruit weight
110 g
30.
% Juice
47.2%
31.
% Soluble solids (at maturity)
12.6%
32.
% Acid (at maturity)
1.11%
33.
Season of maturity
Mid-season (early January-April)
34.
Fruit holding ability
4-8 weeks
on tree past maturity
35.
Fruit quality after storage
Very Good
(5.6° C., 45 days)
TABLE 3
Crop yields for ‘FairchildLS’ and ‘Fairchild’ (control trees) at four
trial sites over two years, 2006/2007, 2007/2008, and 2008/2009.
Age
2006/7
2006/7
2007/8
in
Mean
Yield
Mean
#
2009
Root-
Yield
Range
Yield
Site
Selection
Trees
(yrs)
stock
(kg)
(kg)
(kg)
River-
‘FairchildLS’
10
6
Carrizo
40.1
29.8-
48.3
side
57.9
River-
‘FairchildLS’
9
6
C35
38.8
27.8-
49.2
side
45.9
River-
‘FairchildLS’
1
11
Carrizo
64.8
64.8
46.3
side
(mother)
River-
‘Fairchild’
2
11
Carrizo
68.5
62.4-
47.7
side
control
74.6
Coach-
‘FairchildLS’
6
4
Carrizo
*
*
15.2
ella
Coach-
‘FairchildLS’
6
4
C35
*
*
13.4
ella
Coach-
‘Fairchild’
3
4
Carrizo
*
*
16.7
ella
control
Irvine
‘FairchildLS’
6
5
Carrizo
7.2
0-14.6
28.2
Irvine
‘FairchildLS’
6
5
C35
6.1
0-12.4
34.1
Irvine
‘Fairchild’
4
5
Carrizo
18.1
9.4-
37.1
cntl
25.2
Lind-
‘FairchildLS’
6
4
Carrizo
*
*
19.2
cove
Lind-
‘FairchildLS’
6
4
C35
*
*
23.4
cove
Lind-
‘Fairchild’
4
5
Carrizo
8.6
3.0-
31.7
cove
cntl
13.8
Age
2007/8
2008/9
2008/9
in
Yield
Mean
Yield
#
2009
Root-
Range
Yield
Range
Site
Selection
Trees
(yrs)
stock
(kg)
(kg)
(kg)
River-
‘FairchildLS’
10
6
Carrizo
32.1-
67.2
53.1-
side
60.6
82.4
River-
‘FairchildLS’
9
6
C35
31.0-
64.7
55.1-
side
66.9
79.4
River-
‘FairchildLS’
1
11
Carrizo
46.3
70.4
70.4
side
(mother)
River-
‘Fairchild’
2
11
Carrizo
44.1-
66.9
62.9-
side
control
51.3
70.9
Coach-
‘FairchildLS’
6
4
Carrizo
8.1-
32.2
19.3-
ella
24.4
38.1
Coach-
‘FairchildLS’
6
4
C35
6.3-
35.9
17.9-
ella
21.7
46.4
Coach-
‘Fairchild’
3
4
Carrizo
14.1-
29.7
21.8-
ella
control
18.7
32.0
Irvine
‘FairchildLS’
6
5
Carrizo
22.8-
41.6
36.1-
43 .9
62.4
Irvine
‘FairchildLS’
6
5
C35
27.8-
43.5
39.8-
45.9
65.9
Irvine
‘Fairchild’
4
5
Carrizo
24.6-
49.2
41.5-
cntl
47.9
54.6
Lind-
‘FairchildLS’
6
4
Carrizo
10.1-
30.1
18.8-
cove
27.4
36.1
Lind-
‘FairchildLS’
6
4
C35
8.4-
28.9
15.9-
cove
29.7
35.4
Lind-
‘Fairchild’
4
5
Carrizo
24.4-
35.6
26.4-
cove
cntl
38.7
42.0
* Not fruiting
TABLE 4
Seed counts (average number of seeds per fruit) for ‘FairchildLS’
and ‘Fairchild’ (control trees) at four trial sites over two years,
2007/2008 and 2008/2009.
2007/8
2007/8
2008/9
2008/9
Tree
Mean
Seed
Mean
Seed
Age
Root-
Seeds/
Count
Seeds/
Count
Site
Selection
(yrs)
stock
Fruit
Range
Fruit
Range
River-
‘Fair-
6
Carrizo
2.5
1.9-3.6
2.4
2.2-3.3
side
childLS’
(10
trees)
River-
‘Fair-
6
C35
2.4
2.1-3.3
2.6
2.0-3.0
side
childLS’
(9
trees)
River-
‘Fair-
11
Carrizo
2.3
NA
2.4
NA
side
childLS’
(1
(mother)
tree)
River-
‘Fairchild’
11
Carrizo
18.9
10.1-
21.4
18.6-
side
control
(2
14.4
24.2
trees)
Coach-
‘Fair-
4
Carrizo
1.8
0.8-2.6
1.9
1.2-2.7
ella
childLS’
(6
trees)
Coach-
‘Fair-
4
C35
2.0
1.3-2.5
2.2
1.3-2.7
ella
childLS’
(6
trees)
Coach-
‘Fairchild’
4
Carrizo
17.8
15.2-
18.9
16.1-
ella
control
(4
20.4
23.2
trees)
Irvine
‘Fair-
5
Carrizo
2.2
1.8-2.6
2.4
2.0-2.6
childLS’
(6
trees)
Irvine
‘Fair-
5
C35
2.0
1.6-2.4
2.3
1.9-2.7
childLS’
(6
trees)
Irvine
‘Fairchild’
5
Carrizo/
16.2
13.8-
15.5
12.9-
control
(4
C35
20.4
19.3
trees)
Lind-
‘Fair-
4
Carrizo
1.2
0.9-2.0
1.5
0.8-2.1
cove
childLS’
(6
trees)
Lind-
‘Fair-
4
C35
1.3
0.7-
1.4
1.1-2.2
cove
childLS’
(6
0.1.8
trees)
Lind-
‘Fairchild’
4
Carrizo
14.8
12.3-
15.4
13.9-
cove
control
(2
17.3
16.9
trees)
TABLE 5
Mean and standard deviation (S.D.) of soluble solids, acid and
solids/acid ratio for ‘FairchildLS’ on Carrizo and C35 citrange
rootstock at four trial sites, 2007/2008 crop year.
Soluble
Soluble
%
Solids %
Solids
Acid
Site
Date
Carrrizo
S.D.
% C35
S.D.
Carrizo
Riverside
Dec. 17,
11.1
0.37
10.7
0.46
1.35
2007
Riverside
Jan. 15,
12.4
0.26
12.0
0.45
1.11
2008
Riverside
Feb. 9,
13.3
0.49
12.9
0.33
0.98
2008
Riverside
Mar. 18,
14.5
0.53
14.0
0.47
0.86
2008
Coachella
Dec. 17,
12.0
0.31
10.3
0.36
0.97
2007
Coachella
Jan. 15,
13.0
0.29
12.7
0.29
0.85
2008
Coachella
Feb. 15,
13.4
0.33
13.0
0.24
0.81
2008
Coachella
Mar. 20,
13.1
0.55
13.1
0.41
0.76
2008
Irvine
Dec. 17,
11.5
0.68
11.9
0.39
1.31
2007
Irvine
Jan. 15,
12.3
0.32
12.8
0.50
1.09
2008
Irvine
Feb. 9,
13.5
0.40
13.4
0.22
0.95
2008
Irvine
Mar. 18,
14.4
0.42
14.2
0.31
0.91
2008
Lindcove
Dec. 17,
9.8
0.51
9.3
0.33
1.41
2007
Lindcove
Jan. 15,
12.1
0.27
11.2
0.29
1.17
2008
Lindcove
Feb. 9,
12.8
0.40
12.5
0.40
1.02
2008
Lindcove
Mar. 18,
13.9
0.39
13.6
0.56
0.93
2008
%
S/A
S/A
Acid
Ratio
Ratio
Site
Date
S.D.
C35
S.D.
Carrizo
C35
Riverside
Dec. 17,
0.13
1.32
0.10
8.2
8.1
2007
Riverside
Jan. 15,
0.10
1.19
0.08
11.2
10.1
2008
Riverside
Feb. 9,
0.06
1.04
0.06
13.6
12.4
2008
Riverside
Mar. 18,
0.08
0.94
0.05
16.7
14.9
2008
Coachella
Dec. 17,
0.12
1.06
0.07
12.4
9.7
2007
Coachella
Jan. 15,
0.09
0.94
0.09
15.3
13.5
2008
Coachella
Feb. 15,
0.16
0.85
0.04
16.5
15.3
2008
Coachella
Mar. 20,
0.10
0.78
0.09
18.2
16.8
2008
Irvine
Dec. 17,
0.14
1.28
0.11
8.8
9.3
2007
Irvine
Jan. 15,
0.13
1.17
0.11
11.3
10.9
2008
Irvine
Feb. 9,
0.08
0.97
0.07
14.2
13.9
2008
Irvine
Mar. 18,
0.08
0.90
0.08
15.8
15.8
2008
Lindcove
Dec. 17,
0.15
1.46
0.18
7.0
7.0
2007
Lindcove
Jan. 15,
0.11
1.23
0.12
10.1
9.1
2008
Lindcove
Feb. 9,
0.06
1.09
0.07
12.5
11.7
2008
Lindcove
Mar. 18,
0.06
1.01
0.08
14.9
13.5
2008
TABLE 6
Comparison of ‘FairchildLS’ with other mid to mid-late season,
low-seeded mandarins. Data for Riverside, California.
Trait
‘FairchildLS’
‘Tango’
‘TDE3’
‘TDE4’
‘DaisySL’
Maturity
Early-
Late-
Late-
February
Early
January.
January
January
December-
early
January.
Seeds per
2.4
0.15
0.29
0.32
2.2
fruit
RHS rind
Orange
Orange
Orange-
Orange-
Orange-
color
N25B
N25A
Red
Red
Red
N30C
N30C
N30C
Rind texture
moderately
smooth
papillate
smooth
very
smooth
smooth
Fruit weight
110
90
134
175
135
(g)
Fruit
0.88
0.81
0.85
0.78
0.88
height/width
Alternate
medium
low
medium-
medium-
medium
bearing
high
high
No susceptibilities to plant or fruit diseases, or to pests, beyond those normally associated with citrus species have been observed.
Roose, Mikeal L., Williams, Timothy E.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
PP24947, | Mar 05 2012 | Royal Honey Pty Ltd ATF Royal Honey IP Trust | Tangor tree named ‘RHM’ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 12 2009 | The Regents of the University of California | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 15 2010 | ROOSE, MIKEAL L | The Regents of the University of California | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023880 | /0640 | |
Jan 15 2010 | WILLIAMS, TIMOTHY E | The Regents of the University of California | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023880 | /0640 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |