An asexually reproduced variety of bermudagrass with a unique combination of characters including good turf quality, white anthers, fine textured leaf blade, high culm production, and a distinct DNA fingerprint.

Patent
   PP9976
Priority
Jul 26 1995
Filed
Jul 26 1995
Issued
Jul 22 1997
Expiry
Jul 26 2015
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
1
0
n/a
1. A new and distinct cultivar of bermudagrass plant, substantially as herein illustrated and described, characterized particularly by rapid vegetative establishment, superior shade tolerance, distinct DNA fingerprint; diminutive growth pattern, and white anthers.

`TDS-BM1` is a new and distinct variety of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) discovered by me under a heavily trafficked cultivated, mowed turf in a home lawn in Las Cruces, N. Mex. TDS-BM1 spreads rapidly by both stolons and rhizomes. TDS-BM1 is suitable for use as turf on golf course fairways, sports fields, home lawns, industrial sites, and other sites wherever bermudagrasses are adapted. TDS-BM1 was identified for its diminutive growth pattern, finer leaf texture, and persistence under heavy traffic as compared to surrounding bermudagrass. TDS-BM1 was asexually propagated by me in Las Cruces, N. Mex. by cutting of stolons and rhizomes, rooting them in soil, and planting of the rooted stolons and rhizomes to provide planting stock for studying performance and for comparisons with commercial varieties. TDS-BM1 remained stable in both performance and morphological characters after propagation.

A bermudagrass designated C84-135 was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P. 6,278, issued on Sep. 6, 1988. A bermudagrass designated CT-2 was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P. 6,841, issued on Jun. 6, 1989. A bermudagrass designated World Feeder was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P. 7,081, issued on Dec. 19, 1989. A bermudagrass designated Midlawn was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P. 8,162, issued on Feb. 23, 1993. Another bermudagrass designated Midfield was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P. 8,168, issued on Mar. 2, 1993.

TDS-BM1 is distinguished from other varieties of bermudagrass by the combination of characters of turf performance, shade tolerance, white anthers, leaf texture, culm production, and a distinct DNA fingerprint.

FIG. 1-3 are DNA fingerprints of bermudagrass varieties. The RAPD analysis illustrate TDS-BM1 is different from both Tifgreen and Tifway.

FIG. 4 is a photograph of a stolon of TDS-BM1.

TDS-BM1 is a new and distinct variety of bermudagrass that spreads by stolons and rhizomes. TDS-BM1 is a bermudagrass similar in appearance to Tifgreen and Tifway. TDS-BM1 had a mean stolon internode length of 33.3 mm for nodes 2 through 4 with Tifgreen having a mean of 35.8 mm in measurements on greenhouse grown plants. The leaf blade width of the third youngest leaf on TDS-BM1 was 1.99 mm with Tifgreen having a mean of 2.25 mm. The diameter of the third node on a vegetative stolon of TDS-BM1 was 0.87 with Tifgreen having a mean of 0.99.

In trials in Gainseville, Fla., TDS-BM1 was reported as having high seasonal turf quality in 1993 with a mean of 6.87, and was statistically higher in quality than Tifgreen (Table 1). TDS-BM1 was also higher in quality than Tifgreen in 1994 in Florida trials (Table 2). In the 1992 and 1993 NTEP trials in Texas, TDS-BM1 ranked second and first in quality of 26 entries. In color ratings of vegetative bermudagrasses, TDS-BM1 is not statistically different from Tifgreen or Tifway (Tables 3,4). In addition, in the 1992 and 1993 NTEP Trials, TDS-BM1 had a mean color rating of 6.7 in both years. TDS-BM1 has a fine textured leaf blade compared to Midfield, Midlawn, and Midiron (Table 5). In the 1992 NTEP trials (TAES-Dallas), TDS-BM1 was reported to have a statistically finer leaf blade than Midlawn, Midiron, Midfield, Texturf 10, and STF-1 in both 1992 and 1993.

TDS-BM1 has a rapid rate of spread (Table 6). Under shaded conditions, TDS-BM1 maintains higher percent plot cover compared to Tifgreen (Table 7,8). In trials in Mississippi, TDS-BM1 was statistically earlier in greenup than 16 entries in the National Bermudagrass Trial for 1993 and 1994 (Table 9). In the 1993 NTEP report from Mississippi, TDS-BM1 reported the second highest spring greenup rate of 26 varieties at 11 different locations.

TDS-BM1 has the highest number of seedheads in the Florida trials in 1993 (Table 1). TDS-BM1 had the highest seedhead production in trials in Dallas (Table 10-12). TDS-BM1 has white anthers, similar to Tifgreen and Midfield (Table 13).

TDS-BM1 showed lower salt injury than Midiron, Texturf 10, and STF-1 in evaluations of percent shoot salt injury at Texas A&M -Dallas, of the 1992 National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (Table 14). TDS-BM1 showed higher susceptibility to pink snow mold than Midfield, Midiron, or Midlawn (Table 15).

TDS-BM1 shows a distinctly different DNA from Tifgreen using RAPD analysis using a single primer of an arbitral oligonucleotide referred to as JAP 29 (FIG. 1) of JAP 26 (FIG. 2). Both TDS-BM1 and Tifgreen may be distinguished from Tifway using a single primer of an arbitral oligonucleotide referred to as JAP 26 (FIG. 2) and JAP 25 or JAP 27 (FIG. 3).

TABLE 1
______________________________________
Seasonal and average estimates of bermudagrass turf quality and
seed head production during the third growing season in 1993 at
Gainesville, FL. (Partial data set)
Quality1
May- July- Sept.-
June Aug. Nov. Average
Seed Heads2
______________________________________
FHB-135 6.6 7.1 6.7 6.90 a*
1.0 g
TDS-BM1 7.1 6.9 7.1 6.87 a 5.1 ab
Tifway 6.6 6.6 6.7 6.49 ab
1.6 e-g
Midiron 6.0 6.1 7.3 6.36 a-c
3.3 c
Sultan 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.15 b-d
2.1 d-g
Texturf 10
6.0 6.0 6.1 6.10 b-e
1.6 e-g
Tifgreen
6.6 5.8 6.3 6.03 b-f
4.4 b
Midfield
6.1 5.8 6.2 6.03 b-f
2.0 d-g
Sonesta 6.4 6.0 5.3 5.80 b-g
2.0 d-g
MSD 0.8 0.6 1.3 0.70 1.1
______________________________________
1 Quality visually rated 1 to 9 where 9 equaled best turf quality.
2 Seed heads visually rated 1 to 9 where 1 equaled no seed heads and
9 equaled many seedheads. Eight ratings throughout the season were
averaged.
*Means within columns with the same letter are not significantly differen
(P = 0.05) using WallerDuncan kratio ttest.
MSD is the minimum significant difference between any two means within
columns which must be exceeded to be significantly different (P = 0.05)
using WallerDuncan kratio ttest.
Dudeck, A. E. 1995. NTEP bermudagrass trials in North Florida. In
Turfgrass Research in Florida, ed. J. L. Cisar. University of Florida,
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Florida Agricultural
Experiment Station, Gainseville, FL.
TABLE 2
______________________________________
Seasonal and average estimates of bermudagrass turf quality and
seed head production during the third growing season in 1994 at
Gainesville, FL (data presented for vegetatively planted
varieties only).
Quality1
Mar- June- Sept.-
May Aug. Dec. Average
Seed Heads2
______________________________________
FHB-240 8.2 7.4 7.0 7.53 a*
1.73 g
TDS-BM1 7.9 7.3 7.1 7.45 ab
1.40 g
Tifway 6.9 7.8 7.4 7.35 a-c
1.00 g
FHB-227 7.8 7.1 7.1 7.35 a-c
1.47 g
FHB-285 6.8 7.8 7.4 7.31 a-c
1.00 g
FHB-281 6.4 7.0 7.4 6.92 b-d
1.20 g
Texturf 10
7.2 6.8 6.6 6.86 cd
1.20 g
Midiron 6.8 6.4 6.7 6.67 de
1.00 g
Tifgreen
6.3 6.9 6.6 6.57 de
1.53 g
MSD 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.57 0.87
______________________________________
1 Quality visually rated 1 to where 9 equaled best turf quality.
2 Seed heads visually rated 1 to 9 where 1 equaled no seed heads and
9 equaled many seedheads. Thirteen ratings throughout the season were
averaged.
*Means within columns with the same letter are not significantly differen
(P = 0.05) using WallerDuncan kratio ttest.
MSD is the minimum significant difference between any two means within
columns which must be exceeded to be significantly different (P = 0.05)
using WallerDuncan kratio ttest.
Dudeck, A. E. 1995. NTEP bermudagrass trials in North Florida. In
Turfgrass Research in Florida, ed. J. L. Cisar. University of Florida,
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Florida Agricultural
Experiment Station, Gainseville, FL.
TABLE 3
______________________________________
Color1 quality of 1992 NTEP bermudagrasses -
TAES-Dallas during 1992-3. (Vegetative entries only).
Date
26 20 24
Sept Jan Feb 16 26 22
Entry 92 93 93 Apr 93
May 93
Jun 93
TPI
______________________________________
AZ common
4.7 a 2.0 2.3 a
5.0 7.0 7.7 2
FHB-135 3.0 3.0 2.0 7.3 a 8.0 7.3 1
Midfield 3.7 4.0 a 3.0 a
8.0 a 9.0 a 8.7 a 5
Midiron 3.7 4.7 a 2.3 a
7.3 a 9.0 a 8.3 a 5
Midlawn 4.7 a 4.0 a 3.0 a
7.7 a 9.0 a 7.7 5
STF-1 4.0 a 4.3 a 3.0 a
8.0 a 8.0 8.3 a 5
TDS-BM1 3.7 4.0 a 3.0 a
8.0 a 8.3 8.7 a 4
Texturf 10
4.3 a 2.7 3.0 a
7.7 a 8.0 7.7 3
Tifgreen 3.0 4.7 a 3.0 a
8.3 a 8.0 8.3 a 4
Tifway 3.7 4.3 a 3.0 a
7.7 a 8.0 8.0 a 4
MSD entry2
1.1 0.8 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.8
______________________________________
1 Color quality was estimated for a range from 1 to 9, where 9 is th
ideal green turf color, and 5 is the minimum acceptable green turf color.
2 MSD entry = minimum significant difference between entry means,
which is based on the WallerDuncan Kratio ttest (kratio = 100). Means in
the top statistical group are indicated by an `a`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Bermudagrass entries in the
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. P. Metz. Texas A &
University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 4
______________________________________
Color1 ratings during 1993-4 for the 1992 NTEP bermudagrass
trial planted at TAES-Dallas. (Vegetative entries only).
1993 1994
Entry 28 July 31 Aug 28 Sept
27 Oct
18 Feb
TPI
______________________________________
AZ common
6.0 a 7.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 1
FHB-135 6.3 a 6.0 4.0 5.7 1.0 1
Midfield 4.3 8.3 5.0 5.7 1.7 0
Midiron 6.0 a 7.0 4.7 4.0 1.7 1
Midlawn 5.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 1.7 0
STF-1 6.0 a 7.7 5.3 5.3 2.0 a 2
TDS-BM1 6.0 a 5.7 5.0 5.7 2.0 a 2
Texturf 10
6.3 a 6.7 5.7 6.0 1.7 1
Tifgreen 5.0 6.3 5.0 5.7 1.7 0
Tifway 4.7 6.7 5.7 6.0 2.7 a 1
MSD entry2
0.9 ns ns ns 1.0
______________________________________
1 Color ratings were estimated, on a scale of 1 to 9, where 9
represented the darkest green, and 5 was the minimum acceptable color.
2 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100).
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry
means. Means in the top statistical group are indicated by `a`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. 1994 Update for the National
Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Trial at TAESDallas: 1992 Bermudagras
Trial. PR. 5240. In Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke.
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 5
______________________________________
Leaf texture on September 26, 1992 of bermudagrasses in the 1992
NTEP planted at TAES-Dallas. (Vegetative entries only).
Entry Leaf Texture
______________________________________
AZ common Medium
FHB-135 Fine
Midfield Coarse
Midiron Medium
Midlawn Medium
STF-1 Medium fine
TDS-BM1 Fine
Texturf 10 Medium fine
Tifgreen Fine
Tifway Fine
______________________________________
Texture was estimated on a scale of 1 to 3, where 3 was the finest leaf
blade and 1 was the coarsest leaf blade.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. Bermudagrass entries in the
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. Metz. Texas A & M
University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 6
______________________________________
Turf cover establishment by 1992 NTEP bermudagrasses
planted on July 14, 1992 at TAES-Dallas.
Percent turf cover1
Date
9 26 26 23 24 26 22
Entry Aug Aug Sep Oct Feb May Jun TPI2
______________________________________
AZ Com 23 40 98 a 99 a 98 92 a 92 4
FHB-135 17 19 73 77 80 73 89 1
Midfield 26 43 98 a 99 a 99 96 a 96 a 5
Midiron 15 23 83 93 a 97 96 a 95 a 4
Midlawn 26 45 99 a 99 a 99 96 a 95 a 5
STF-1 16 28 90 a 99 a 99 96 a 96 a 5
TDS-BM1 24 53 a 93 a 88 a 87 91 a 94 a 6
Texturf 10
18 28 95 a 98 a 99 96 a 96 a 5
Tifgreen 25 42 99 a 99 a 99 96 a 96 a 5
Tifway 13 23 80 86 a 88 89 a 93 a 4
MSD Entry3
18 22 14 20 ns 8 83
______________________________________
1 Turf cover is noted as the percent of the plot coverage for each
date.
2 TPI = Turf Performance Index, which is the total number of times a
entry occurred in the top statistical group.
MSD entry = minimum significant difference between entry means, which is
based on the 3 WallerDuncan kratio ttest (kratio = 100). NS = no
significant difference occurred between entry means. Means in the top
statistical group are indicated by an `a`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Bermudagrass entries in the
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. Texas A &
University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 7
______________________________________
Turf cover, as percentage of the plot that has turf ground cover,
for bermudagrasses of the 1992 NTEP planted in 90% shade
at TAES-Dallas.
Percent Turf Cover
Date
Entry 11 Nov 93 21 Dec 93 16 Mar 94
TPI
______________________________________
AZ common 15.0 15.0 9.7 0
FHB-135 35.0 a 47.7 a 10.7 2
Midfield 31.7 a 25.0 12.3 1
Midiron 28.3 41.7 a 11.7 1
Midlawn 31.7 a 48.3 a 11.7 2
STF-1 35.0 a 36.7 10.0 1
TDS-BM1 51.7 a 51.7 a 15.0 a 3
Texturf 10
23.3 38.3 a 7.3 1
Tifgreen 28.3 30.0 9.0 1
Tifway 55.0 a 58.3 a 12.3 2
MSD entry1
1.8 1.2 1.6
______________________________________
1 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100).
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry
means. Means in the top statistical group are indicated by `a`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. Performance of three warmseason
turfgrass genera cultured in shade II. Cynodon dactylon. PR. 5243. In
Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke. Texas A & M
University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 8
______________________________________
Turf cover, as percentage of the plot that has turf ground cover,
for bermudagrasses of the 1992 NTEP planed in 90% shade at
TAES-Dallas.
Percent green turf cover
1993
Vegetative Entry
7 May 8 June 9 July
3 Aug TPI1
______________________________________
AZ Common 43 18 33 33 --
FHB-135 57 a 53 a 72 a 53 a 4
Midfield 50 47 a 62 48 1
Midiron 50 50 a 58 45 1
Midlawn 60 a 43 a 70 a 50 3
STF-1 53 a 33 52 43 1
TDS-BM1 63 a 55 a 80 a 63 a 4
Texturf 10 50 38 60 47 --
Tifgreen 53 a 30 55 42 1
Tifway 63 a 55 a 73 a 53 a 4
MSD entry2
13 14 14 12
______________________________________
1 TPI = turf performance index, which was the number of times an
entry occurred in the top statistical group.
2 MSD entry minimum significant difference between entry means for
comparison within a column, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio
ttest (Kratio = 100). Means in the top statistical group are designated b
an `a`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Performance of three warmseason
turfgrass genera cultured in shade. II. Cynodon dactylon. In Texas
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. PR5138.
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 9
______________________________________
Spring green-up ratings of the National Bermudagrass Test - 1992.
(Mississippi State University).
2 year
Entry 1993 1994 average
______________________________________
Midiron 6.41
5.7 6.1
TDS-BM1 6.4 5.7 6.0
Tifgreen 6.6 5.2 5.9
Midfield 6.7 5.0 5.9
Tifdwarf 6.3 4.9 5.6
Tifway 6.3 4.8 5.6
Guymon 5.7 5.1 5.4
Texturf 10 5.9 4.9 5.4
STF-1 6.1 4.3 5.2
ZPS-B1 5.3 5.0 5.1
Midlawn 5.7 4.4 5.1
J-27 4.9 5.2 5.1
FHB-135 5.9 3.8 4.8
OKS 91-11 4.9 4.6 4.7
MSB-40 5.2 4.1 4.6
90173 3.5 5.6 4.5
AZ Com.-veg 4.7 4.7 4.1
J-192 4.0 4.2 4.1
FMC 5-91 3.1 4.9 4.0
FMC 6-91 2.7 4.9 3.8
FMC 2-90 2.9 4.7 3.8
OKS 91-1 2.7 4.6 3.6
Cheyenne 2.4 4.7 3.6
Sundevil 2.3 4.8 3.5
Sonesta 2.2 4.8 3.5
FMC 3-91 2.1 4.8 3.4
AZ Com.-seed 2.2 4.3 3.4
Sahara 2.1 4.6 3.3
FMC 1-90 1.8 4.7 3.3
Mean 4.4 4.8 4.6
LSD (0.05) 0.7 0.7 1.2
______________________________________
1 9 = completely green, 1 = brown
Philley, H. W., J. V. Krans, J. M. Goatley, Jr., and V. L. Maddox. 1994.
Update on the National Bermudagrass Tests1992 at MSU. In Missisissippi
Turfgrass Research Progress Report 1994. Bulletin 274. Miss Agric &
Forestry Exp St. Mississippi State, MS 39762.
TABLE 10
______________________________________
Seedhead production during 1993 for the 1992 NTEP bermuda-
grass trial planted at TAES-Dallas. (Vegetative entries only).
Seedhead Density1
Date
Entry 8 Jun 93 23 Aug 93 Mean
______________________________________
AZ common 1.0 1.3 1.2
FHB-135 0.0 1.0 0.5
Midfield 2.7 0.0 1.3
Midiron 2.7 0.3 1.5
Midlawn 1.7 0.3 1.0
STF-1 5.3 0.3 2.8
TDS-BM1 7.3 a 2.7 a 5.0 a
Texturf 10 1.7 0.7 1.2
Tifgreen 4.7 0.7 2.7
Tifway 1.7 0.3 1.0
MSD entry2
1.8 1.2 1.6
______________________________________
1 Seedhead density estimated on a scale of 1-9, where 9 represents
highest seedhead density.
2 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100).
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry
means. Means in top statistical group are indicated by `a`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. 1994 Update for the National
Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Trial at TAESDallas: 1992 Bermudagras
Trial. PR. 5240. In Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke.
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 11
______________________________________
Seedhead production during 1993 for the 1992 NTEP bermuda-
grass trial planted at TAES-Dallas. (Vegetative entries only).
Seedheads/sq. inch
Date
Entry 6 July 93 4 Nov 93 Mean
______________________________________
AZ common 0 7 4
FHB-135 3 0 2
Midfield 11 0 6
Midiron 2 1 1
Midlawn 0 0 0
STF-1 7 26 a 16 a
TDS-BM1 46 a 0 23 a
Texturf 10 1 6 4
Tifgreen 13 0 7
Tifway 0 0 0
MSD entry1
9 12 13
______________________________________
1 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100).
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry
means. Means in the top statistical group are indicated by `a`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. 1994 Update for the National
Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Trial at TAESDallas: 1992 Bermudagras
Trial. PR. 5240. In Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke.
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 12
______________________________________
Culm production on June 8 (visual) and July 6, 1993 (count)
by 1992 NTEP bermudagrasses planted at TAES-Dallas.
(Vegetative entries only).
8 June 6 July
Entry Visual1
Count1
______________________________________
Midfield 2.7 d-g* 11.3 bc
Midlawn 1.7 e-h 0.0 d
Tifgreen 4.7 bc 1.3 d
STF-1 5.3 b 6.7 b-d
Texturf 10 1.7 e-h 0.0 d
Midiron 2.7 d-g 2.0 d
TDS-BM1 7.3 a 46.3 a
Tifway 1.7 e-h 13.3 b
AZ common 1.0 gh 0.3 d
FHB-135 0.0 h 3.0 cd
______________________________________
1 Visual = 1-9, where 9 = most seed heads. Count = number/80.6 cm sq
*Means with the same letter were not significantly different, based on th
WallerDuncan kratio ttest (kratio = 100).
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Bermudagrass entries in the
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. Texas A &
University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 13
______________________________________
Anther color on June 8, 1993 of 1992 NTEP bermudagrasses
planted at TAES-Dallas.
Entry Anther color
______________________________________
Midfield W1
Midlawn PW
Tifgreen W
STF-1 P
Texturf 10 P
Midiron K
TDS-BM1 W
Tifway K
AZ common K
JFHB-135 --
______________________________________
1 Color is designated as P = purple, W = white, and K = pink. Entrie
that produced no flowers are indicated by `--`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Bermudagrass entries in the
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. Texas A &
University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 14
______________________________________
Percent shoot salt injury over six rating dates of 26
bermudagrasses included in the 1992 National
Turfgrass Evaluation Program trial -TAES-Dallas.
Vegetative
23 27 6 13 24 13
Entry Oct Oct Nov Nov Nov Dec TPI1
______________________________________
Tifway 0 a 37 a 46 45 a 71 68 a 4
Midlawn 7 a 47 43 a 36 a 75 71 a 4
Tifgreen 0 a 33 a 30 a 32 a 56 a 72 a 6
TDS-BM1 0 a 32 a 37 a 37 a 66 a 73 a 6
FHB-135 6 a 33 a 32 a 33 a 62 a 75 a 6
Midfield 0 a 47 50 52 76 80 1
Ariz.Com 0 a 43 41 a 47 86 83 2
Midiron 37 72 52 51 81 84 0
Texturf 10
12 48 55 53 85 88 0
STF-1 0 a 32 a 46 43 a 77 93 3
MSD entry2
9 13 16 14 11 10
______________________________________
1 TPI = turf performance index, which was the number of times an
entry occurred in the top statistical group.
2 MSD entry minimum significant difference between entry means for
comparison within a column, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio
ttest (Kratio = 100). Means in the top statistical group are designated b
an `a`.
Marcum, K. B., M. C. Engelke, S. J. Morton, and C. Dayton. 1993. Salinity
tolerances of selected bermudagrass and zoysiagrass genotypes. In Texas
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. PR5140.
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843.
TABLE 15
______________________________________
Pink snow mold tolerance during winter 1993-4 for the 1992
NTEP bermudagrasses planted at TAES-Dallas.
Pink Snow mold %1
Entry 7 Mar 1994
______________________________________
AZ common 98 a
FHB-135 75
Midfield 82 a
Midiron 94 a
Midlawn 73
STF-1 83 a
TDS-BM1 77
Texturf 10 98 a
Tifgreen 89 a
Tifway 92 a
MSD entry2 21
______________________________________
1 Percentage is area of the plot without snow mold injury.
2 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100).
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry
means. Means in the top statistical group are indicated by `a`.
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. 1994 Update for the National
Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Trial at TAESDallas: 1992 Bermudagras
Trial. PR. 5240. In Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke.
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843.

Takefumi Omura of Japan Turfgrass Inc. performed the DNA fingerprint analysis. The bermudagrass DNA fingerprints were TDS-BM1, Tifgreen, and Tifway. The DNA fingerprints were produced by extractions from the leaf tissue of the vegetatively propagated clones. The results of the DNA fingerprint analysis are summarized:

TDS-BM1 shows a distinctly different DNA from Tifgreen using RAPD analysis using a single primer of an arbitral oligonucleotide referred to as JAP 29 (FIG. 1) or JAP 26 (FIG. 2). Both TDS-BM1 and Tifgreen may be distinguished from Tifway using a single primer of an arbitral oligonucleotide referred to as JAP 26 (FIG. 2) and JAP 25 or JAP 27 (FIG. 3).

National Bermudagrass Test-1992. Progress Report 1992. National Turfgrass Evaluation Program. USDA-ARS, Beltsville Agric. Research Ctr. Beltsville, Md. 20705.

National Bermudagrass Test-1992. Progress Report 1993. National Turfgrass Evaluation Program. USDA-ARS, Beltsville Agric. Research Ctr. Beltsville, Md. 20705.

Porter, William Emme

Patent Priority Assignee Title
PP11898, Jul 24 1998 Kidwell Organics, Inc. Bermudagrass named `90NB-Kid`
Patent Priority Assignee Title
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
n/a
Date Maintenance Fee Events


n/a
Date Maintenance Schedule