`TDS-BM1` is a new and distinct variety of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)
discovered by me under a heavily trafficked cultivated, mowed turf in a
home lawn in Las Cruces, N. Mex. TDS-BM1 spreads rapidly by both stolons
and rhizomes. TDS-BM1 is suitable for use as turf on golf course fairways,
sports fields, home lawns, industrial sites, and other sites wherever
bermudagrasses are adapted. TDS-BM1 was identified for its diminutive
growth pattern, finer leaf texture, and persistence under heavy traffic as
compared to surrounding bermudagrass. TDS-BM1 was asexually propagated by
me in Las Cruces, N. Mex. by cutting of stolons and rhizomes, rooting them
in soil, and planting of the rooted stolons and rhizomes to provide
planting stock for studying performance and for comparisons with
commercial varieties. TDS-BM1 remained stable in both performance and
morphological characters after propagation.
A bermudagrass designated C84-135 was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P.
6,278, issued on Sep. 6, 1988. A bermudagrass designated CT-2 was
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P. 6,841, issued on Jun. 6, 1989. A
bermudagrass designated World Feeder was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P.
7,081, issued on Dec. 19, 1989. A bermudagrass designated Midlawn was
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P. 8,162, issued on Feb. 23, 1993. Another
bermudagrass designated Midfield was disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. P.P.
8,168, issued on Mar. 2, 1993.
TDS-BM1 is distinguished from other varieties of bermudagrass by the
combination of characters of turf performance, shade tolerance, white
anthers, leaf texture, culm production, and a distinct DNA fingerprint.
FIG. 1-3 are DNA fingerprints of bermudagrass varieties. The RAPD analysis
illustrate TDS-BM1 is different from both Tifgreen and Tifway.
FIG. 4 is a photograph of a stolon of TDS-BM1.
TDS-BM1 is a new and distinct variety of bermudagrass that spreads by
stolons and rhizomes. TDS-BM1 is a bermudagrass similar in appearance to
Tifgreen and Tifway. TDS-BM1 had a mean stolon internode length of 33.3 mm
for nodes 2 through 4 with Tifgreen having a mean of 35.8 mm in
measurements on greenhouse grown plants. The leaf blade width of the third
youngest leaf on TDS-BM1 was 1.99 mm with Tifgreen having a mean of 2.25
mm. The diameter of the third node on a vegetative stolon of TDS-BM1 was
0.87 with Tifgreen having a mean of 0.99.
In trials in Gainseville, Fla., TDS-BM1 was reported as having high
seasonal turf quality in 1993 with a mean of 6.87, and was statistically
higher in quality than Tifgreen (Table 1). TDS-BM1 was also higher in
quality than Tifgreen in 1994 in Florida trials (Table 2). In the 1992 and
1993 NTEP trials in Texas, TDS-BM1 ranked second and first in quality of
26 entries. In color ratings of vegetative bermudagrasses, TDS-BM1 is not
statistically different from Tifgreen or Tifway (Tables 3,4). In addition,
in the 1992 and 1993 NTEP Trials, TDS-BM1 had a mean color rating of 6.7
in both years. TDS-BM1 has a fine textured leaf blade compared to
Midfield, Midlawn, and Midiron (Table 5). In the 1992 NTEP trials
(TAES-Dallas), TDS-BM1 was reported to have a statistically finer leaf
blade than Midlawn, Midiron, Midfield, Texturf 10, and STF-1 in both 1992
and 1993.
TDS-BM1 has a rapid rate of spread (Table 6). Under shaded conditions,
TDS-BM1 maintains higher percent plot cover compared to Tifgreen (Table
7,8). In trials in Mississippi, TDS-BM1 was statistically earlier in
greenup than 16 entries in the National Bermudagrass Trial for 1993 and
1994 (Table 9). In the 1993 NTEP report from Mississippi, TDS-BM1 reported
the second highest spring greenup rate of 26 varieties at 11 different
locations.
TDS-BM1 has the highest number of seedheads in the Florida trials in 1993
(Table 1). TDS-BM1 had the highest seedhead production in trials in Dallas
(Table 10-12). TDS-BM1 has white anthers, similar to Tifgreen and Midfield
(Table 13).
TDS-BM1 showed lower salt injury than Midiron, Texturf 10, and STF-1 in
evaluations of percent shoot salt injury at Texas A&M -Dallas, of the 1992
National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (Table 14). TDS-BM1 showed higher
susceptibility to pink snow mold than Midfield, Midiron, or Midlawn (Table
15).
TDS-BM1 shows a distinctly different DNA from Tifgreen using RAPD analysis
using a single primer of an arbitral oligonucleotide referred to as JAP 29
(FIG. 1) of JAP 26 (FIG. 2). Both TDS-BM1 and Tifgreen may be
distinguished from Tifway using a single primer of an arbitral
oligonucleotide referred to as JAP 26 (FIG. 2) and JAP 25 or JAP 27 (FIG.
3).
TABLE 1 |
______________________________________ |
Seasonal and average estimates of bermudagrass turf quality and |
seed head production during the third growing season in 1993 at |
Gainesville, FL. (Partial data set) |
Quality1 |
May- July- Sept.- |
June Aug. Nov. Average |
Seed Heads2 |
______________________________________ |
FHB-135 6.6 7.1 6.7 6.90 a* |
1.0 g |
TDS-BM1 7.1 6.9 7.1 6.87 a 5.1 ab |
Tifway 6.6 6.6 6.7 6.49 ab |
1.6 e-g |
Midiron 6.0 6.1 7.3 6.36 a-c |
3.3 c |
Sultan 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.15 b-d |
2.1 d-g |
Texturf 10 |
6.0 6.0 6.1 6.10 b-e |
1.6 e-g |
Tifgreen |
6.6 5.8 6.3 6.03 b-f |
4.4 b |
Midfield |
6.1 5.8 6.2 6.03 b-f |
2.0 d-g |
Sonesta 6.4 6.0 5.3 5.80 b-g |
2.0 d-g |
MSD 0.8 0.6 1.3 0.70 1.1 |
______________________________________ |
1 Quality visually rated 1 to 9 where 9 equaled best turf quality. |
2 Seed heads visually rated 1 to 9 where 1 equaled no seed heads and |
9 equaled many seedheads. Eight ratings throughout the season were |
averaged. |
*Means within columns with the same letter are not significantly differen |
(P = 0.05) using WallerDuncan kratio ttest. |
MSD is the minimum significant difference between any two means within |
columns which must be exceeded to be significantly different (P = 0.05) |
using WallerDuncan kratio ttest. |
Dudeck, A. E. 1995. NTEP bermudagrass trials in North Florida. In |
Turfgrass Research in Florida, ed. J. L. Cisar. University of Florida, |
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Florida Agricultural |
Experiment Station, Gainseville, FL. |
TABLE 2 |
______________________________________ |
Seasonal and average estimates of bermudagrass turf quality and |
seed head production during the third growing season in 1994 at |
Gainesville, FL (data presented for vegetatively planted |
varieties only). |
Quality1 |
Mar- June- Sept.- |
May Aug. Dec. Average |
Seed Heads2 |
______________________________________ |
FHB-240 8.2 7.4 7.0 7.53 a* |
1.73 g |
TDS-BM1 7.9 7.3 7.1 7.45 ab |
1.40 g |
Tifway 6.9 7.8 7.4 7.35 a-c |
1.00 g |
FHB-227 7.8 7.1 7.1 7.35 a-c |
1.47 g |
FHB-285 6.8 7.8 7.4 7.31 a-c |
1.00 g |
FHB-281 6.4 7.0 7.4 6.92 b-d |
1.20 g |
Texturf 10 |
7.2 6.8 6.6 6.86 cd |
1.20 g |
Midiron 6.8 6.4 6.7 6.67 de |
1.00 g |
Tifgreen |
6.3 6.9 6.6 6.57 de |
1.53 g |
MSD 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.57 0.87 |
______________________________________ |
1 Quality visually rated 1 to where 9 equaled best turf quality. |
2 Seed heads visually rated 1 to 9 where 1 equaled no seed heads and |
9 equaled many seedheads. Thirteen ratings throughout the season were |
averaged. |
*Means within columns with the same letter are not significantly differen |
(P = 0.05) using WallerDuncan kratio ttest. |
MSD is the minimum significant difference between any two means within |
columns which must be exceeded to be significantly different (P = 0.05) |
using WallerDuncan kratio ttest. |
Dudeck, A. E. 1995. NTEP bermudagrass trials in North Florida. In |
Turfgrass Research in Florida, ed. J. L. Cisar. University of Florida, |
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Florida Agricultural |
Experiment Station, Gainseville, FL. |
TABLE 3 |
______________________________________ |
Color1 quality of 1992 NTEP bermudagrasses - |
TAES-Dallas during 1992-3. (Vegetative entries only). |
Date |
26 20 24 |
Sept Jan Feb 16 26 22 |
Entry 92 93 93 Apr 93 |
May 93 |
Jun 93 |
TPI |
______________________________________ |
AZ common |
4.7 a 2.0 2.3 a |
5.0 7.0 7.7 2 |
FHB-135 3.0 3.0 2.0 7.3 a 8.0 7.3 1 |
Midfield 3.7 4.0 a 3.0 a |
8.0 a 9.0 a 8.7 a 5 |
Midiron 3.7 4.7 a 2.3 a |
7.3 a 9.0 a 8.3 a 5 |
Midlawn 4.7 a 4.0 a 3.0 a |
7.7 a 9.0 a 7.7 5 |
STF-1 4.0 a 4.3 a 3.0 a |
8.0 a 8.0 8.3 a 5 |
TDS-BM1 3.7 4.0 a 3.0 a |
8.0 a 8.3 8.7 a 4 |
Texturf 10 |
4.3 a 2.7 3.0 a |
7.7 a 8.0 7.7 3 |
Tifgreen 3.0 4.7 a 3.0 a |
8.3 a 8.0 8.3 a 4 |
Tifway 3.7 4.3 a 3.0 a |
7.7 a 8.0 8.0 a 4 |
MSD entry2 |
1.1 0.8 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.8 |
______________________________________ |
1 Color quality was estimated for a range from 1 to 9, where 9 is th |
ideal green turf color, and 5 is the minimum acceptable green turf color. |
2 MSD entry = minimum significant difference between entry means, |
which is based on the WallerDuncan Kratio ttest (kratio = 100). Means in |
the top statistical group are indicated by an `a`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Bermudagrass entries in the |
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas |
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. P. Metz. Texas A & |
University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 4 |
______________________________________ |
Color1 ratings during 1993-4 for the 1992 NTEP bermudagrass |
trial planted at TAES-Dallas. (Vegetative entries only). |
1993 1994 |
Entry 28 July 31 Aug 28 Sept |
27 Oct |
18 Feb |
TPI |
______________________________________ |
AZ common |
6.0 a 7.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 1 |
FHB-135 6.3 a 6.0 4.0 5.7 1.0 1 |
Midfield 4.3 8.3 5.0 5.7 1.7 0 |
Midiron 6.0 a 7.0 4.7 4.0 1.7 1 |
Midlawn 5.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 1.7 0 |
STF-1 6.0 a 7.7 5.3 5.3 2.0 a 2 |
TDS-BM1 6.0 a 5.7 5.0 5.7 2.0 a 2 |
Texturf 10 |
6.3 a 6.7 5.7 6.0 1.7 1 |
Tifgreen 5.0 6.3 5.0 5.7 1.7 0 |
Tifway 4.7 6.7 5.7 6.0 2.7 a 1 |
MSD entry2 |
0.9 ns ns ns 1.0 |
______________________________________ |
1 Color ratings were estimated, on a scale of 1 to 9, where 9 |
represented the darkest green, and 5 was the minimum acceptable color. |
2 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry |
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100). |
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry |
means. Means in the top statistical group are indicated by `a`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. 1994 Update for the National |
Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Trial at TAESDallas: 1992 Bermudagras |
Trial. PR. 5240. In Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke. |
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 5 |
______________________________________ |
Leaf texture on September 26, 1992 of bermudagrasses in the 1992 |
NTEP planted at TAES-Dallas. (Vegetative entries only). |
Entry Leaf Texture |
______________________________________ |
AZ common Medium |
FHB-135 Fine |
Midfield Coarse |
Midiron Medium |
Midlawn Medium |
STF-1 Medium fine |
TDS-BM1 Fine |
Texturf 10 Medium fine |
Tifgreen Fine |
Tifway Fine |
______________________________________ |
Texture was estimated on a scale of 1 to 3, where 3 was the finest leaf |
blade and 1 was the coarsest leaf blade. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. Bermudagrass entries in the |
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas |
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. Metz. Texas A & M |
University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 6 |
______________________________________ |
Turf cover establishment by 1992 NTEP bermudagrasses |
planted on July 14, 1992 at TAES-Dallas. |
Percent turf cover1 |
Date |
9 26 26 23 24 26 22 |
Entry Aug Aug Sep Oct Feb May Jun TPI2 |
______________________________________ |
AZ Com 23 40 98 a 99 a 98 92 a 92 4 |
FHB-135 17 19 73 77 80 73 89 1 |
Midfield 26 43 98 a 99 a 99 96 a 96 a 5 |
Midiron 15 23 83 93 a 97 96 a 95 a 4 |
Midlawn 26 45 99 a 99 a 99 96 a 95 a 5 |
STF-1 16 28 90 a 99 a 99 96 a 96 a 5 |
TDS-BM1 24 53 a 93 a 88 a 87 91 a 94 a 6 |
Texturf 10 |
18 28 95 a 98 a 99 96 a 96 a 5 |
Tifgreen 25 42 99 a 99 a 99 96 a 96 a 5 |
Tifway 13 23 80 86 a 88 89 a 93 a 4 |
MSD Entry3 |
18 22 14 20 ns 8 83 |
______________________________________ |
1 Turf cover is noted as the percent of the plot coverage for each |
date. |
2 TPI = Turf Performance Index, which is the total number of times a |
entry occurred in the top statistical group. |
MSD entry = minimum significant difference between entry means, which is |
based on the 3 WallerDuncan kratio ttest (kratio = 100). NS = no |
significant difference occurred between entry means. Means in the top |
statistical group are indicated by an `a`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Bermudagrass entries in the |
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas |
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. Texas A & |
University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 7 |
______________________________________ |
Turf cover, as percentage of the plot that has turf ground cover, |
for bermudagrasses of the 1992 NTEP planted in 90% shade |
at TAES-Dallas. |
Percent Turf Cover |
Date |
Entry 11 Nov 93 21 Dec 93 16 Mar 94 |
TPI |
______________________________________ |
AZ common 15.0 15.0 9.7 0 |
FHB-135 35.0 a 47.7 a 10.7 2 |
Midfield 31.7 a 25.0 12.3 1 |
Midiron 28.3 41.7 a 11.7 1 |
Midlawn 31.7 a 48.3 a 11.7 2 |
STF-1 35.0 a 36.7 10.0 1 |
TDS-BM1 51.7 a 51.7 a 15.0 a 3 |
Texturf 10 |
23.3 38.3 a 7.3 1 |
Tifgreen 28.3 30.0 9.0 1 |
Tifway 55.0 a 58.3 a 12.3 2 |
MSD entry1 |
1.8 1.2 1.6 |
______________________________________ |
1 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry |
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100). |
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry |
means. Means in the top statistical group are indicated by `a`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. Performance of three warmseason |
turfgrass genera cultured in shade II. Cynodon dactylon. PR. 5243. In |
Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke. Texas A & M |
University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 8 |
______________________________________ |
Turf cover, as percentage of the plot that has turf ground cover, |
for bermudagrasses of the 1992 NTEP planed in 90% shade at |
TAES-Dallas. |
Percent green turf cover |
1993 |
Vegetative Entry |
7 May 8 June 9 July |
3 Aug TPI1 |
______________________________________ |
AZ Common 43 18 33 33 -- |
FHB-135 57 a 53 a 72 a 53 a 4 |
Midfield 50 47 a 62 48 1 |
Midiron 50 50 a 58 45 1 |
Midlawn 60 a 43 a 70 a 50 3 |
STF-1 53 a 33 52 43 1 |
TDS-BM1 63 a 55 a 80 a 63 a 4 |
Texturf 10 50 38 60 47 -- |
Tifgreen 53 a 30 55 42 1 |
Tifway 63 a 55 a 73 a 53 a 4 |
MSD entry2 |
13 14 14 12 |
______________________________________ |
1 TPI = turf performance index, which was the number of times an |
entry occurred in the top statistical group. |
2 MSD entry minimum significant difference between entry means for |
comparison within a column, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio |
ttest (Kratio = 100). Means in the top statistical group are designated b |
an `a`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Performance of three warmseason |
turfgrass genera cultured in shade. II. Cynodon dactylon. In Texas |
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. PR5138. |
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 9 |
______________________________________ |
Spring green-up ratings of the National Bermudagrass Test - 1992. |
(Mississippi State University). |
2 year |
Entry 1993 1994 average |
______________________________________ |
Midiron 6.41 |
5.7 6.1 |
TDS-BM1 6.4 5.7 6.0 |
Tifgreen 6.6 5.2 5.9 |
Midfield 6.7 5.0 5.9 |
Tifdwarf 6.3 4.9 5.6 |
Tifway 6.3 4.8 5.6 |
Guymon 5.7 5.1 5.4 |
Texturf 10 5.9 4.9 5.4 |
STF-1 6.1 4.3 5.2 |
ZPS-B1 5.3 5.0 5.1 |
Midlawn 5.7 4.4 5.1 |
J-27 4.9 5.2 5.1 |
FHB-135 5.9 3.8 4.8 |
OKS 91-11 4.9 4.6 4.7 |
MSB-40 5.2 4.1 4.6 |
90173 3.5 5.6 4.5 |
AZ Com.-veg 4.7 4.7 4.1 |
J-192 4.0 4.2 4.1 |
FMC 5-91 3.1 4.9 4.0 |
FMC 6-91 2.7 4.9 3.8 |
FMC 2-90 2.9 4.7 3.8 |
OKS 91-1 2.7 4.6 3.6 |
Cheyenne 2.4 4.7 3.6 |
Sundevil 2.3 4.8 3.5 |
Sonesta 2.2 4.8 3.5 |
FMC 3-91 2.1 4.8 3.4 |
AZ Com.-seed 2.2 4.3 3.4 |
Sahara 2.1 4.6 3.3 |
FMC 1-90 1.8 4.7 3.3 |
Mean 4.4 4.8 4.6 |
LSD (0.05) 0.7 0.7 1.2 |
______________________________________ |
1 9 = completely green, 1 = brown |
Philley, H. W., J. V. Krans, J. M. Goatley, Jr., and V. L. Maddox. 1994. |
Update on the National Bermudagrass Tests1992 at MSU. In Missisissippi |
Turfgrass Research Progress Report 1994. Bulletin 274. Miss Agric & |
Forestry Exp St. Mississippi State, MS 39762. |
TABLE 10 |
______________________________________ |
Seedhead production during 1993 for the 1992 NTEP bermuda- |
grass trial planted at TAES-Dallas. (Vegetative entries only). |
Seedhead Density1 |
Date |
Entry 8 Jun 93 23 Aug 93 Mean |
______________________________________ |
AZ common 1.0 1.3 1.2 |
FHB-135 0.0 1.0 0.5 |
Midfield 2.7 0.0 1.3 |
Midiron 2.7 0.3 1.5 |
Midlawn 1.7 0.3 1.0 |
STF-1 5.3 0.3 2.8 |
TDS-BM1 7.3 a 2.7 a 5.0 a |
Texturf 10 1.7 0.7 1.2 |
Tifgreen 4.7 0.7 2.7 |
Tifway 1.7 0.3 1.0 |
MSD entry2 |
1.8 1.2 1.6 |
______________________________________ |
1 Seedhead density estimated on a scale of 1-9, where 9 represents |
highest seedhead density. |
2 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry |
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100). |
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry |
means. Means in top statistical group are indicated by `a`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. 1994 Update for the National |
Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Trial at TAESDallas: 1992 Bermudagras |
Trial. PR. 5240. In Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke. |
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 11 |
______________________________________ |
Seedhead production during 1993 for the 1992 NTEP bermuda- |
grass trial planted at TAES-Dallas. (Vegetative entries only). |
Seedheads/sq. inch |
Date |
Entry 6 July 93 4 Nov 93 Mean |
______________________________________ |
AZ common 0 7 4 |
FHB-135 3 0 2 |
Midfield 11 0 6 |
Midiron 2 1 1 |
Midlawn 0 0 0 |
STF-1 7 26 a 16 a |
TDS-BM1 46 a 0 23 a |
Texturf 10 1 6 4 |
Tifgreen 13 0 7 |
Tifway 0 0 0 |
MSD entry1 |
9 12 13 |
______________________________________ |
1 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry |
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100). |
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry |
means. Means in the top statistical group are indicated by `a`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. 1994 Update for the National |
Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Trial at TAESDallas: 1992 Bermudagras |
Trial. PR. 5240. In Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke. |
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 12 |
______________________________________ |
Culm production on June 8 (visual) and July 6, 1993 (count) |
by 1992 NTEP bermudagrasses planted at TAES-Dallas. |
(Vegetative entries only). |
8 June 6 July |
Entry Visual1 |
Count1 |
______________________________________ |
Midfield 2.7 d-g* 11.3 bc |
Midlawn 1.7 e-h 0.0 d |
Tifgreen 4.7 bc 1.3 d |
STF-1 5.3 b 6.7 b-d |
Texturf 10 1.7 e-h 0.0 d |
Midiron 2.7 d-g 2.0 d |
TDS-BM1 7.3 a 46.3 a |
Tifway 1.7 e-h 13.3 b |
AZ common 1.0 gh 0.3 d |
FHB-135 0.0 h 3.0 cd |
______________________________________ |
1 Visual = 1-9, where 9 = most seed heads. Count = number/80.6 cm sq |
*Means with the same letter were not significantly different, based on th |
WallerDuncan kratio ttest (kratio = 100). |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Bermudagrass entries in the |
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas |
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. Texas A & |
University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 13 |
______________________________________ |
Anther color on June 8, 1993 of 1992 NTEP bermudagrasses |
planted at TAES-Dallas. |
Entry Anther color |
______________________________________ |
Midfield W1 |
Midlawn PW |
Tifgreen W |
STF-1 P |
Texturf 10 P |
Midiron K |
TDS-BM1 W |
Tifway K |
AZ common K |
JFHB-135 -- |
______________________________________ |
1 Color is designated as P = purple, W = white, and K = pink. Entrie |
that produced no flowers are indicated by `--`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1993. Bermudagrass entries in the |
National Turfgrass Evaluation program Trial at Dallas. PR. 5111. In Texas |
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. Texas A & |
University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 14 |
______________________________________ |
Percent shoot salt injury over six rating dates of 26 |
bermudagrasses included in the 1992 National |
Turfgrass Evaluation Program trial -TAES-Dallas. |
Vegetative |
23 27 6 13 24 13 |
Entry Oct Oct Nov Nov Nov Dec TPI1 |
______________________________________ |
Tifway 0 a 37 a 46 45 a 71 68 a 4 |
Midlawn 7 a 47 43 a 36 a 75 71 a 4 |
Tifgreen 0 a 33 a 30 a 32 a 56 a 72 a 6 |
TDS-BM1 0 a 32 a 37 a 37 a 66 a 73 a 6 |
FHB-135 6 a 33 a 32 a 33 a 62 a 75 a 6 |
Midfield 0 a 47 50 52 76 80 1 |
Ariz.Com 0 a 43 41 a 47 86 83 2 |
Midiron 37 72 52 51 81 84 0 |
Texturf 10 |
12 48 55 53 85 88 0 |
STF-1 0 a 32 a 46 43 a 77 93 3 |
MSD entry2 |
9 13 16 14 11 10 |
______________________________________ |
1 TPI = turf performance index, which was the number of times an |
entry occurred in the top statistical group. |
2 MSD entry minimum significant difference between entry means for |
comparison within a column, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio |
ttest (Kratio = 100). Means in the top statistical group are designated b |
an `a`. |
Marcum, K. B., M. C. Engelke, S. J. Morton, and C. Dayton. 1993. Salinity |
tolerances of selected bermudagrass and zoysiagrass genotypes. In Texas |
Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. P. F. Colbaugh and S. F. Metz. PR5140. |
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
TABLE 15 |
______________________________________ |
Pink snow mold tolerance during winter 1993-4 for the 1992 |
NTEP bermudagrasses planted at TAES-Dallas. |
Pink Snow mold %1 |
Entry 7 Mar 1994 |
______________________________________ |
AZ common 98 a |
FHB-135 75 |
Midfield 82 a |
Midiron 94 a |
Midlawn 73 |
STF-1 83 a |
TDS-BM1 77 |
Texturf 10 98 a |
Tifgreen 89 a |
Tifway 92 a |
MSD entry2 21 |
______________________________________ |
1 Percentage is area of the plot without snow mold injury. |
2 MSD entry is the minimum significant difference between the entry |
means, which is based on the WallerDuncan kratio t test (kratio = 100). |
`ns` indicates that no statistical difference occurred between entry |
means. Means in the top statistical group are indicated by `a`. |
Morton, S. J. and M. C. Engelke. 1994. 1994 Update for the National |
Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) Trial at TAESDallas: 1992 Bermudagras |
Trial. PR. 5240. In Texas Turfgrass Research Reports, ed. M. C. Engelke. |
Texas A & M University System, College Station, TX, 77843. |
Takefumi Omura of Japan Turfgrass Inc. performed the DNA fingerprint
analysis. The bermudagrass DNA fingerprints were TDS-BM1, Tifgreen, and
Tifway. The DNA fingerprints were produced by extractions from the leaf
tissue of the vegetatively propagated clones. The results of the DNA
fingerprint analysis are summarized:
TDS-BM1 shows a distinctly different DNA from Tifgreen using RAPD analysis
using a single primer of an arbitral oligonucleotide referred to as JAP 29
(FIG. 1) or JAP 26 (FIG. 2). Both TDS-BM1 and Tifgreen may be
distinguished from Tifway using a single primer of an arbitral
oligonucleotide referred to as JAP 26 (FIG. 2) and JAP 25 or JAP 27 (FIG.
3).
National Bermudagrass Test-1992. Progress Report 1992. National Turfgrass
Evaluation Program. USDA-ARS, Beltsville Agric. Research Ctr. Beltsville,
Md. 20705.
National Bermudagrass Test-1992. Progress Report 1993. National Turfgrass
Evaluation Program. USDA-ARS, Beltsville Agric. Research Ctr. Beltsville,
Md. 20705.
Porter, William Emme
Patent |
Priority |
Assignee |
Title |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Date |
Maintenance Fee Events |
n/a
Date |
Maintenance Schedule |
n/a