An endless track assembly for use with a track-type vehicle having a notched drive sprocket is provided with link elements having a resilient mid-pitch impact lug located midway between the track link bushings. The resilient mid-pitch lug reduces track noise and wear due to metal-to-metal impact of the track against the sprocket and idler by having a topmost portion of greater height than adjacent bushings whereby initial contact is made by the lug so that impact energy is thereby absorbed prior to engagement of the track bushings.
|
1. In an endless track assembly of the type used on a vehicle provided with a drive sprocket having teeth and notches alternately disposed about the circumference of the sprocket, said track assembly comprising a pair of laterally upstanding link elements; parallel pin and bushing elements secured to and interconnecting respectively opposite ends of the links; a track shoe secured to the bottoms of said links; the improvement comprising a resilient impact lug reinforced by reinforcing means including a wear resistant material secured to the contact end of said impact lug, said lug being releasably secured to the shoe midway between the bushing elements, said impact lug having a topmost portion of greater height from the track shoe than the topmost portion of the adjacent bushings whereby initial contact is made by said lug so that impact energy is absorbed by the lug prior to engagement of an adjacent bushing.
6. In an endless track assembly of the type used on a vehicle provided with a drive sprocket having teeth and notches alternately disposed about the circumference of the sprocket, said track assembly comprising a pair of laterally upstanding link elements; parallel pin and bushing elements secured to and interconnecting respectively opposite ends of the links; a track shoe secured to the bottoms of said links; the improvement comprising a resilient impact lug in the form of a hollow, generally tubular body of synthetic plastic material substantially harder than natural rubber releasably secured to the shoe midway between the bushing elements, said hollow, generally tubular body being reinforced by reinforcing means including a reinforcement ply imbedded therein, comprising a steel wire reinforcement ply circumferentially imbedded in said hollow, generally tubular body, said impact lug having a topmost portion of greater height from the track shoe than the topmost portion of the adjacent bushings whereby initial contact is made by said lug so that impact energy is absorbed by the lug prior to engagement of an adjacent bushing.
9. In an endless track assembly of the type used on a vehicle provided with a drive sprocket having teeth and notches alternately disposed about the circumference of the sprocket, said track assembly comprising a pair of laterally upstanding link elements; parallel pin and bushing elements secured to and interconnecting respectively opposite ends of the links; a track shoe secured to the bottoms of said links; the improvement comprising a resilient impact lug in the form of a hollow, generally tubular body of synthetic plastic material substantially harder than natural rubber releasably secured to the shoe midway between the bushing elements, said tubular body being provided with capping means at the contact end thereof and contains therewithin spring means biased between a pair of pressure plates secured within the body at opposite ends thereof, said impact lug having a topmost portion of greater height from the track shoe than the topmost portion of the adjacent bushings of the adjacent bushings whereby initial contact is made by said lugs so that impact energy is absorbed by the lug prior to engagement of an adjacent bushing.
3. The invention of
4. The invention of
5. The invention of
7. The invention of
8. The invention of
10. The invention of
11. The invention of
|
|||||||||||||||||
The conventional track assembly described above is shown provided with the preferred resilient mid-pitch impact lug of this invention, generally indicated at 34. As best shown in FIG. 2, the lug 34 is disposed at a central location midway between each of the bushings 26, and, as best shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, includes a generally tubular body 36 of an elastomeric material. In the preferred embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIGS. 1-4, the elastomeric material is preferably a synthetic plastic having a hardness substantially greater than natural rubber, e.g. polyurethane, for better wear- and abrasion-resistance of the lug 34. Also, in the preferred embodiment, the generally tubular body 36 is hollow, reducing the amount of material necessary to form the lug 34, thereby reducing the manufacturing costs thereof. Advantageously, a fabric or metal, for example steel, reinforcing ply 37 may be circumferentially imbedded in the body 36 for additional strength, or other reinforcing means may be used.
The lug 34 may be formed by conventional means. For example, the lug 34 reinforced by the ply 37 may be formed by extruding the material and subsequently cutting it to the proper dimensions. Alternatively, if the ply 37 is not used, the body 36 may be formed by injection molding, a preferred method for minimizing manufacturing costs.
The lug 34 is attached to the inner surface 31 of the track shoe 29 by fastening means such as a pair of bolts 38, as shown in FIG. 3. The bolts 38 are disposed through the shoe 29 and the wall of the tubular body 36, and threadably engage a mounting strip 39. A pair of cylindrical spacers 40 are preferably disposed around the bolts 38 so that a sufficiently torque may be applied to the bolts to prevent loosening during operations of the vehicle, while avoiding the exertion of undue compressive force on the lug 34. As shown in FIG. 4, a shim 41 may be placed under each lug 34 after a predetermined amount of wear has occurred in the lug, to extend its useful life.
In the alternate embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 5, a resilient drive lug 34a comprises a natural rubber body 36a. Since the natural rubber is softer than the synthetic plastic material comprising the lug 34, the body 36a is solid rather than hollow to provide it with a comparable resiliency or spring rate. The body 36a also includes a mounting strip 39a bonded thereto, which is threadably engaged by the mounting bolts 38. A particular advantage of the lug 34a is that, in the event the track 22 jumps the sprocket 16, the natural rubber body 36a is sufficiently flexible to be deflected sideways with little or no injurious effects.
In the alternate embodiment shown in FIG. 6, a resilient drive lug 34b includes a solid natural rubber body 36b having a wedge-shaped tapered end 42. The tapered end 42 forces mud or other accumulations from the sprocket notches 17 during operation of the vehicle to prevent the mud from building up therein. Preferably, a hard tip 43 of steel or other wear-resistant material is bonded or otherwise secured to the tapered end 42 to provide increased wear resistance of the lug 34b.
In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 7, a resilient lug 34c includes a hollow tubular body 36c having cap means 44 disposed over one of the open ends thereof and bonded thereto for imparting increased wear-resistance to the body 36c. The material comprising the cap means 44 has sufficiently high wear resistant qualities to increase the wear life of the lug 34c, while at the same time being sufficiently low in mass to avoid having an appreciably detrimental effect on the noise abating qualities of the lug. Steel cap means of low mass may be advantageously used.
The resilient lug of this invention may be used in conjunction with additional spring means as illustrated in FIG. 7 to provide a lug having a greater spring rate, for use for example in conjunction with relatively large vehicles. As shown, a pair of spaced pressure plates 46 and 47 are disposed within the hollow body 34c, and secured thereto, as by bonding. Spring means comprising two stacks of opposing Belleville spring washers 48, separated by a spacer 49, are disposed between the pressure plates 46 and 47. A hold-down bolt 51 having a shoulder 52 to limit compression of the lug 34c cooperates with a nut 53 to secure the lug to the track shoe 29. The bolt 51 is provided with an enlarged head 54 which engages the pressure plate 46 for preloading the washers 48.
In the alternate embodiment illustrated in FIG. 8 7, a resilient impact lug 34d includes a solid rubber body 36d, and a pair of lateral protrusions 56 extending laterally from the opposite sides thereof. One of the protrusions 56 is disposed adjacent an underlying edge 57 of the adjoining track shoe 29a to provide a cushion between the adjacent track shoes 29 and 29a, and the track shoe 29a and the corresponding track link 24a to reduce metal-to-metal contact customarily encountered between grouser 58 and the shoe 29 during back-flexing of the track assembly 22. Although one protrusion 56 is sufficient to this purpose, two are preferably provided to make the lug 34d reversible and thereby extend its useful life.
In operation, as the track assembly 22 advances around the track roller frame 14, each of the individual link sections 24 successively comes into engagement with the idler 18 and the sprocket 16. On conventional track structures, the initial contact of such engagement is accompanied by a severe impact between the bushings 26 at the sprocket and the rail surfaces 33 at the idler. However, with the present track structure employing the resilient lug 34, which is dimensioned to be of greater height from the track shoe inner surface 31 than the topmost portion of the adjacent bushings 26, such initial contact is made by the lug, as in the notches 17 of the sprocket and the raised center portion 21 of the idler, so that the impact energy is absorbed by the lugs prior to the metal-to-metal engagement of the track with the idler and sprocket. Therefore, the noise and wear associated with such metal-to-metal impact is greatly reduced.
As the track is driven clockwise around the sprocket, as best shown in FIG. 4, the driving tension in each track link section 23 becomes sucessively less, which permits the energy stored in the lugs 34 to progressively lift the bushings 26 out of engagement with the sprocket notches 17 to eliminate the scrubbing which normally occurs therebetween as the track chain leaves at the top of the sprocket. Thus, the lug 34 eliminates another major source of wear of the bushings 26 and the sprocket notches 17.
Still another source of track noise is produced from the metal-to-metal impact between adjoining track shoes, which occurs when the track is back-flexed, as when the track runs over a rock or other similar object. The noise produced by such back-bending is reduced by the utilization of the protrusions 56 provided on the lug 34d shown in FIG. 8, which contacts the underlying edge 57 of the adjacent track shoe prior to the metal-to-metal contact of the edge of one track shoe with the grouser 58 of the following track shoe. Therefore, the noise is reduced in a manner similar to the way in which the main body 36d reduces the noise between the track and the idler and sprocket, as described earlier, by the absorption of the impact energy the the lug. The protrusions 56 are provided on both sides of the lug 34d to make the lug reversible.
Although the invention has been hereinbefore described and illustrated in the accompanying drawings with respect to specific embodiments, various modifications and changes may be made therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention, and thus it is not intended to limit the invention except by the terms of the appended claims.
Haslett, Glenn M., Reinsma, Harold L.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 5482364, | Aug 26 1991 | Edwards, Harper, McNew & Company | Replacement endless vehicle tracks |
| 5511869, | Aug 26 1991 | Edwards, Harper, McNew & Company | Replacement endless vehicle tracks |
| 6450593, | Jan 26 2000 | Komatsu Ltd. | Elastic crawler shoe for discharging snow |
| D712935, | Jun 29 2012 | Caterpillar Inc | Undercarriage track shoe for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D719588, | Jun 29 2012 | Caterpillar Inc | Undercarriage track system for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D736268, | Jun 29 2012 | Caterpillar Inc. | Undercarriage track shoe for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D738405, | Jun 29 2012 | Caterpillar Inc. | Undercarriage track system for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D747365, | Jun 29 2012 | Caterpillar Inc. | Undercarriage track system for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D751609, | Jun 29 2012 | Caterpillar Inc | Undercarriage track link for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D752656, | Jun 29 2012 | Caterpillar Inc. | Undercarriage track shoe for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D767641, | Apr 01 2015 | Caterpillar Inc. | Track link assembly |
| D769333, | Apr 01 2015 | Caterpillar Inc. | Track link |
| D775239, | Aug 13 2015 | Caterpillar Inc.; Caterpillar Inc | Rail guide |
| D790599, | Apr 01 2015 | Caterpillar Inc. | Track link |
| D804538, | Aug 13 2015 | Caterpillar Inc. | Rail guide |
| D823349, | May 04 2017 | Caterpillar Inc. | Undercarriage track shoe for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D855662, | May 04 2017 | Caterpillar Inc. | Undercarriage track shoe for mobile earthmoving machine |
| D882643, | May 04 2017 | Caterpillar Inc. | Undercarriage track shoe for mobile earthmoving machine |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 1513459, | |||
| 3486574, | |||
| 3563614, | |||
| 3567294, | |||
| 3680929, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| May 31 1977 | Caterpillar Tractor Co. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| May 15 1986 | CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO , A CORP OF CALIF | CATERPILLAR INC , A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004669 | /0905 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Aug 08 1981 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 08 1982 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 08 1982 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Aug 08 1984 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Aug 08 1985 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 08 1986 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 08 1986 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Aug 08 1988 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Aug 08 1989 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Feb 08 1990 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 08 1990 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Aug 08 1992 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |