An apparatus for automatically sensing trailer sway and applying trailer brakes, thereby minimizing or eliminating the sway is provided. A hydraulic device, similar to a shock absorber with the addition of a pressure operated switch at each end of the cylinder, is mounted between the trailer A frame and the hitch head assembly. A sudden sway in either direction causes one of the switches to close and apply power to the electric trailer brakes thus minimizing or eliminating the sway and causing the car and trailer to "line up". The hydraulic device has an orifice in the piston or at each end of the cylinder so that normal turns made by the car and trailer do not cause sufficient pressure build up to cause either switch to operate. Similar automatic performance can be realized by the use of a gas filled bellows device.
|
1. A sway control system for controlling brakes of a towed vehicle in response to the detection of a sway condition comprising:
a hydraulic unit having first and second ends mounted to coupling means between the towed vehicle and a towing vehicle, which hydraulic unit includes first and second fluid passages associated with said first and second ends of the unit, each passage including a check valve shunted by a bypass restricted orifice and a pressure switch, and an electric brake circuit for applying and releasing the brakes of the towed vehicle in response to said pressure switches being opened or closed, said hydraulic unit constituting a sway detection device for sensing the onset of a sway condition of a towed vehicle relative to a towing vehicle.
2. A sway control apparatus for controlling the brakes of a towed vehicle joined to a towing vehicle by a towing connection permitting turning movement of said towed and towing vehicles relative to each other about a yaw axis, said apparatus comprising:
signal generating means connected between said towed and towing vehicles for providing a signal having a characteristic responsive to the rate of change of the angle between said vehicles about said yaw axis; and, actuator means for actuating said brakes in response to said signal, said actuator means being effective to actuate said brakes in response to a single turning movement between said vehicles in either direction about said yaw axis when said rate of angle change exceeds a predetermined magnitude. 3. The apparatus of
each other about said yaw axis. 5. The apparatus of claim 4 in which said piston and said cylinder define a chamber for pressurizing a fluid, and said actuator means includes pressure responsive means for actuating said towed vehicle brakes in response to a predetermined fluid pressure in said chamber. 6. The apparatus of claim 5 in which said sensing means includes conduit means for conveying said fluid between said chamber and said pressure responsive means. 7. The apparatus of claim 6 in which said conduit means includes valves means for controlling the flow of fluid through said conduit means. 8. The apparatus of claim 7 in which said valve means includes a check valve 9. The apparatus of claim 7 in which said valve means includes an orifice. 10. The apparatus of claim 7 in which said valve means is adjustable. 11. The apparatus of claim 6 in which said conduit means includes a first fluid passage containing a check valve for permitting free flow from said chamber to said pressure responsive means while preventing flow from said pressure responsive means to said chamber, and a second fluid passage bypassing said check valve and containing an orifice for restricting flow between said chamber and said pressure responsive means. 12. The apparatus of claim 2 in which said signal generating means includes cylinder means having a first chamber and a second chamber, piston means cooperating with said cylinder means for pressurizing a fluid in said first chamber and said second chamber, and coupling means for causing fluid in said first chamber to be pressurized in response to relative turning movement between said vehicles in one direction about said yaw axis and fluid in said second chamber to be pressurized in response to relative turning movement between said vehicles in the other direction about said yaw axis, and in which said actuator means includes pressure responsive means for actuating said towed vehicle brakes in response to a predetermined fluid pressure in said first and second chambers. |
One of the greatest dangers in towing a trailer is swaying and jackknifing. This can be caused by quick evasive action by the driver, gusty winds or air currents caused by other vehicles, especially large tractor trailers, overtaking and passing the towing and towed vehicle. When a vehicle overtakes and passes a towed vehicleA section1A in the piston 1B or at each end of the cylinder 1C is such that the force required to elongate the unit is essentially the same as that required to compress or shorten the unit. Mounting details 2 and 3 must not have rubber inserts as they normally have in shock absorbers. Hydraulic check valves 5 and 9 have adjustable bypass valves 6 and 10 in parallel with them. Pressure operated switches 7 and 11 have either wire or terminal connections represented by 8 and 12. A universal joint type element 4 is mounted to 2 and 3 by means of a through bolt. The other ends of the universal elements are then mounted to the A frame 13 of the towed vehicle 33 and the hitch head 15 of the towing vehicle 34 as shown in FIG. 2. The universal joint 4 that is bolted to 2 is in turn mounted on a supporting pin on the hitch head 15 a short distance from the hitch ball 14. The purpose of check valves 5 and 9 is to allow free passage of hydraulic fluid to pressure operated switches 7 and 11. The fluid must return to the cylinder through adjustable valves 6 and 10. A slight delay in the opening of switches 7 and 11 has thereby been introduced to keep the brakes energized for a short period after the rate of swaying has been reduced. For a given operational requirement, fixed orifices can be used in place of valves 6 and 10. The combination of valves 6 and 10 (or fixed orifices) and check valves 5 and 9 is shown to obtain the ultimate in sway correction. Considerable, and in most cases adequate, sway correction is realized without the use of 5, 6, 9 and 10. In applications where a delay in releasing the brakes is considered desirable it can also be done by means of electrical delay circuits.
A schematic of the electrical circuit is shown in FIG. 3. The towing vehicle battery 24 is connected to the brake control unit 23 which is located in a convenient position for the driver to reach and operate. Plug and connector 22 provide circuit connection from the towing vehicle to the towed vehicle. Not shown in the simplified diagrams are the tail light, stop light, direction signal light, running lights and inter battery connections normally provided through connector 22. Electromagnets of the brakes of a single axle trailer are represented by 16 and 17. In trailers with two axles, the electromagnets 18 and 19 are shown by dashed lines. Trailer battery 20 supplies the brake operating current through adjustable resistor 21 and pressure operated switch 7 or 11. Adjustable resistor 21 is set in accordance with one or two axle brake requirements.
Quicker sway correction can be realized by using the trailer brake circuit shown in FIG. 4. This can be described by referring to FIG. 5. If an abnormally fast left turn of the towing vehicle takes place, pressure switch 7 will close and cause only the trailer left wheel brake or brakes to be applied. This will cause the front of the trailer to move to the left and thereby provide the force required a force tending to "line up" the towed and towing vehicles. If the towing vehicle in effect makes an abnormally fast right turn, pressure operated switch 11 closes and applies the trailer right wheel brake or brakes. Diodes 25 and 26 provide the required electrical isolation when either switch 7 or 11 operate and yet permit current to flow to all brakes when brake control 23, in the towing vehicle, is operated.
Present day cars have, for safety reasons, a braking system in which the front wheel brakes and the associated controls are isolated from the rear wheel brakes and their associated control system. Both systems are actuated by the common brake pedal. In such a system, the chance of simultaneous failures of both systems is very remote. Therefore if one system fails you still have the braking capability of the other.
Practicaly all present day tandem axle trailers have a single electrical braking system. An open circuit in the main line, connector, or brake control or a short circuit anywhere in the electrical braking system will result in the loss of all brakes. A dual braking system should be used for tandem axle trailers for the same safety reasons that it is used in a car. Such a system, in conjunction with a sway sensing system, is shown in FIG. 6. Separate trailer front wheel brake wiring and rear wheel wiring is connected through separate plugs and connectors 28 and 29 to dual brake control 27. This figure shows the sway sensing pressure operated switches 7 and 11 connected in such a manner that the operation of either switch will apply braking power to all trailer brakes through diodes 30 and 31. When brake control 27 is operated, these diodes provide electrical isolation between the trailer front and rear axle brakes. In a case where the sway sensing system is not used, resistor 32, pressure operated switches 7 and 11, diodes 30 and 31 and the associated wiring are not used.
A dual braking system in which the sway sensing system applies power to the appropriate left or right trailer brakes only is shown in FIG. 7. Diodes 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 46, and resistors 35, 36, 37 and 38 provide electrical isolation for dual brake control 27 operation and or and/or sway sensing switch 7 or 11 operation in a manner that provides maximum protection against possible circuit failure such as a short circuit or open circuit in the braking system.
Some simplification of the circuit shown in FIG. 7 can be realized by using double pole pressure operated switches 47 and 48 as shown in FIG. 8. Basically the same type of electrical isolation against complete braking system failure in case of open or short circuit conditions is realized with the circuit shown in FIG. 8 as in FIG. 7.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11794706, | Jul 01 2021 | Safety and control system for use when pulling trailers | |
4681335, | Mar 06 1986 | CNH America LLC | Center pivot hitch assembly |
4938542, | Feb 06 1989 | Braking system and break-away braking system | |
5346289, | Oct 30 1992 | TOTAL QUALITY ENTERPRISES, INC | Control valve for hydraulic braking system |
5368372, | Oct 20 1992 | Total Quality Enterprises, Inc. | Hydraulic brake system for an off-road vehicle |
6263261, | Dec 21 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc.; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION | Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle |
6324446, | Dec 21 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc.; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A CORP OF DELAWARE | Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle |
6332104, | Dec 21 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc.; Ford Motor Company | Roll over detection for an automotive vehicle |
6338012, | Dec 21 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle |
6397127, | Sep 25 2000 | FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC , A MICHIGAN CORPORATION | Steering actuated wheel lift identification for an automotive vehicle |
6496758, | Dec 21 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc.; Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Rollover stability control for an automotive vehicle using front wheel actuators |
6523911, | Jun 30 1999 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Method and device for stabilizing a vehicle |
6529803, | Dec 21 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle having rear wheel steering |
6654674, | Nov 21 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Enhanced system for yaw stability control system to include roll stability control function |
6799092, | Feb 21 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Rollover stability control for an automotive vehicle using rear wheel steering and brake control |
6834218, | Nov 05 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle |
6904350, | Sep 25 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System for dynamically determining the wheel grounding and wheel lifting conditions and their applications in roll stability control |
6941205, | Aug 01 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System and method for deteching roll rate sensor fault |
6961648, | Aug 05 2002 | Ford Motor Company | System and method for desensitizing the activation criteria of a rollover control system |
6963797, | Aug 05 2002 | Volvo Car Corporation | System and method for determining an amount of control for operating a rollover control system |
7003389, | Aug 01 2002 | Ford Global Technologies LLC | System and method for characterizing vehicle body to road angle for vehicle roll stability control |
7027902, | Nov 21 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Enhanced system for yaw stability control system to include roll stability control function |
7079928, | Aug 01 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System and method for determining a wheel departure angle for a rollover control system with respect to road roll rate and loading misalignment |
7085639, | Aug 01 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System and method for characterizing the road bank for vehicle roll stability control |
7085642, | Aug 05 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and system for correcting sensor offsets |
7096103, | Aug 05 2002 | Ford Motor Company | System and method for operating a rollover control system during an elevated condition |
7109856, | Sep 25 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Wheel lifted and grounded identification for an automotive vehicle |
7120528, | Aug 05 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System and method for operating a rollover control system in a transition to a rollover condition |
7130735, | Dec 21 1999 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Roll over stability control for an automotive vehicle |
7132937, | Sep 25 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Wheel lift identification for an automotive vehicle using passive and active detection |
7136730, | Nov 21 2001 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Enhanced system for yaw stability control system to include roll stability control function |
7136731, | Jun 11 2003 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System for determining vehicular relative roll angle during a potential rollover event |
7194351, | Aug 01 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System and method for determining a wheel departure angle for a rollover control system |
7233236, | Sep 25 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Passive wheel lift identification for an automotive vehicle using operating input torque to wheel |
7239949, | Feb 26 2003 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Integrated sensing system |
7272481, | Jun 30 2003 | Kelsey-Hayes Company | Method and apparatus for detecting and correcting trailer induced yaw movements in a towing vehicle |
7277787, | May 24 2005 | Ford Motor Company | System and method for desensitizing the activation criteria of a rollover control system |
7302331, | Aug 01 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Wheel lift identification for an automotive vehicle |
7308350, | May 20 2004 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Method and apparatus for determining adaptive brake gain parameters for use in a safety system of an automotive vehicle |
7354056, | May 23 2003 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Trailer stability control apparatus |
7430468, | Aug 05 2002 | Ford Global Tecnologies, LLC | System and method for sensitizing the activation criteria of a rollover control system |
7451032, | Jun 02 2004 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System and method for determining desired yaw rate and lateral velocity for use in a vehicle dynamic control system |
7480547, | Apr 14 2005 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Attitude sensing system for an automotive vehicle relative to the road |
7590481, | Sep 19 2005 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Integrated vehicle control system using dynamically determined vehicle conditions |
7600826, | Nov 09 2005 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System for dynamically determining axle loadings of a moving vehicle using integrated sensing system and its application in vehicle dynamics controls |
7640081, | Oct 01 2004 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Roll stability control using four-wheel drive |
7653471, | Feb 26 2003 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Active driven wheel lift identification for an automotive vehicle |
7660654, | Dec 13 2004 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System for dynamically determining vehicle rear/trunk loading for use in a vehicle control system |
7668645, | Oct 15 2004 | Ford Global Technologies; Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System and method for dynamically determining vehicle loading and vertical loading distance for use in a vehicle dynamic control system |
7676307, | Nov 05 2001 | Ford Global Technologies | System and method for controlling a safety system of a vehicle in response to conditions sensed by tire sensors related applications |
7715965, | Oct 15 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System and method for qualitatively determining vehicle loading conditions |
7877178, | Oct 15 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System and method for dynamically determining vehicle loading and vertical loading distance for use in a vehicle dynamic control system |
7877199, | Oct 15 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System and method for dynamically determining vehicle loading and vertical loading distance for use in a vehicle dynamic control system |
7877200, | Oct 15 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System and method for dynamically determining vehicle loading and vertical loading distance for use in a vehicle dynamic control system |
7877201, | Oct 15 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System and method for dynamically determining vehicle loading and vertical loading distance for use in a vehicle dynamic control system |
7899594, | Oct 25 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System and method for qualitatively determining vehicle loading conditions |
8005592, | Nov 09 2005 | Ford Global Technologies | System for dynamically determining axle loadings of a moving vehicle using integrated sensing system and its application in vehicle dynamics controls |
8005596, | Dec 13 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System for dynamically determining vehicle rear/trunk loading for use in a vehicle control system |
8050857, | Oct 15 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System and method for dynamically determining vehicle loading and vertical loading distance for use in a vehicle dynamic control system |
8121758, | Nov 09 2005 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | System for determining torque and tire forces using integrated sensing system |
8219282, | Dec 13 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System for dynamically determining vehicle rear/trunk loading for use in a vehicle control system |
8311693, | Nov 19 2010 | Robert Bosch LLC | Energy management for hybrid electric vehicle during trailer sway |
8311706, | Sep 19 2005 | Ford Global Technologies | Integrated vehicle control system using dynamically determined vehicle conditions |
8326504, | Jul 30 2009 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Holistic control for stabilizing vehicle-trailer swaying |
8346433, | Dec 13 2004 | Ford Global Technologies | System for dynamically determining vehicle rear/trunk loading for use in a vehicle control system |
8346452, | Sep 19 2005 | Ford Global Technologies | Integrated vehicle control system using dynamically determined vehicle conditions |
8352143, | Sep 19 2005 | Ford Global Technologies | Integrated vehicle control system using dynamically determined vehicle conditions |
8442720, | Sep 19 2005 | Ford Global Technologies | Integrated vehicle control system using dynamically determined vehicle conditions |
8740317, | Aug 11 2006 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Closed-loop control for trailer sway mitigation |
8838353, | Jul 24 2009 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Trailer sway mitigation using measured distance between a trailer and a tow vehicle |
9061663, | Oct 27 2010 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Trailer sway mitigation using torque vectoring |
9162656, | Feb 26 2003 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Active driven wheel lift identification for an automotive vehicle |
D546735, | Jan 05 2006 | Automatic Equipment Manufacting Company | Ball-and-socket joint for tow bar |
RE40268, | Sep 25 2000 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Wheel lift identification for an automotive vehicle |
RE40496, | Mar 04 2002 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Attitude sensing system for an automotive vehicle relative to the road |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3277791, | |||
3288240, | |||
3398991, | |||
3736894, | |||
3758165, | |||
3796288, | |||
3810521, | |||
3861696, | |||
3861717, | |||
3894773, | |||
3948544, | Feb 24 1975 | The Bendix Corporation | Surge brake combination vehicle stabilizer |
3993360, | Mar 26 1975 | Apparatus for safety braking of vehicles | |
3993362, | Jul 19 1973 | Anti-jackknifing and skidding control system |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 18 1979 | Durrell U., Howard | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 24 1984 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 24 1984 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 24 1985 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 24 1987 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 24 1988 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 24 1988 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 24 1989 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 24 1991 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 24 1992 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 24 1992 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 24 1993 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 24 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |