An electrode for use in an electrolytic cell, and a method for producing same, wherein said electrode comprises an internal copper conductor and an external element of a second metal, at least a portion of each having contact surfaces being held in intimate contact with the other, said conductor and said element each having a conductive coating applied to the contact surface, said conductive coating comprising between about 20 and about 30 percent indium and between about 80 and about 70 percent gallium, whereby the contact resistance between said conductor and said element is reduced.

Patent
   RE32078
Priority
Apr 03 1985
Filed
Apr 03 1985
Issued
Feb 04 1986
Expiry
Apr 03 2005
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
3
2
EXPIRED
1. An electrode for use in an electrolytic cell, said electrode being comprised of an internal copper conductor and an external element, said element being selected from the group consisting of titanium and nickel, at least a portion of said copper conductor having contact surfaces which are held in intimate contact with contact surfaces of said external element, said conductor and said element having at an area of contact a conductive coating between said contact surfaces of said conductor and said element, said conductive coating being comprised of a mixture of between about 20 and about 30 percent indium by weight and about 80 and about 70 percent gallium by weight, whereby the contact resistance between said conductor and said element is reduced.
2. The electrode of claim 1 wherein said conductive compound is comprised of between about 23 and about 26 percent by weight of indium and about 77 and about 74 percent by weight of gallium.
3. An electrolytic cell containing the electrode of claim 1.
4. The electrode of claim 1 wherein the titanium further has a layer of copper on said contact surface.
5. An electrode for use in an electrolytic cell said electrode comprising in combination:
(a) copper means having at least a first mating contact surface for conducting electrical energy;
(b) electrolyte corrosion-resistant means having a second mating contact surface which contacts the conductor means along the first mating surface to prevent corrosion of the conductor means, the corrosion-resistant means being selected from the group consisting of titanium and nickel;
(c) electrode surface means connected to the conductor means; and
(d) an electrically conductive coating in contact with the at least first mating contact surface of the copper conductor means and the second mating contact surface of the corrosion-resistant means, the electrically conductive coating being a liquid-metal mixture comprising between about 20 and about 30 percent indium by weight and between about 80 and 70 percent gallium by weight such that the electrical contact resistance between the conductor means and the corrosion-resistant means is reduced. 6. The electrode according to claim 5 wherein said conductive compound is comprised of between about 23 and about 26 percent by weight of indium and about 77 and about 74 percent by weight of gallium. 7. The electrode according to claim 5 wherein the corrosion-resistant means is made of titanium and has a layer of copper on the mating contact surface. 8. An electrode for use in an electrolytic cell having copper conductor means with at least a first mating contact surface for conducting electrical energy, electrolyte corrosion-resistant means having a second mating contact surface which contacts the conductor means along the first mating contact surface, the corrosion-resistant means being selected from the group consisting of titanium and nickel, and electrode surface means connected to the conductor means, the improvement comprising:
an electrically conductive coating in contact with the at least first mating contact surface of the copper means and the second mating contact surface of the corrosion-resistant means, the electrically conductive coating being a liquid-metal mixture comprising between about 20 and about 30 percent indium by weight and between about 80 and about 70 percent gallium by weight such that the electrical contact resistance between the conductor means and the corrosion-resistant means is reduced. 9. The electrode according to claim 8 wherein said conductive compound is comprised of between about 23 and about 26 percent by weight of indium and about 77 and about 74 percent by weight of gallium. 10. The electrode according to claim 8 wherein the corrosion-resistant means is made of titanium and has a layer of copper on the mating contact surface.

for four days or even less.

Two coupons of copper C 110 strip, each being 0.045"×1"×2" were cleaned by degreasing with methanol and acid etching in a 12 weight percent H2 SO4 solution for about 10 seconds to produce a material having a front to back resistance of about 0.06 milliohms. At the same time, two coupons of nickel 200 alloy, each being 0.055"×1"2" were cleaned by vapor degreasing in methanol and acid etching in a solution comprising 37.8 milliliters H2 O+56.8 milliliters H2 SO4 +85.2 milliliters HNO3 for 10 seconds at 35°C to produce material having a front to back resistance of about 0.23 milliohms. After being rinsed with distilled water and dried, an area of about one square inch of a predesignated mating surface of one copper coupon and one nickel coupon was evenly coated with a thin layer of conductive coating 25 having a composition of about 23% indium and 77% gallium, using a cotton swab applicator after which said coated surfaces were pressed together to form a conductive copper-nickel couple. This was placed in an oven set for a nominal temperature of about 90°C For purposes of comparison a cleaned but uncoated copper-nickel couple made from the remaining coupons was also placed in the oven. Both couples were also loaded to 10 psi to simulate both thermal and mechanical levels experienced in a typical chlor-alkali cell electrode installation. When assembled, no bonding was experienced with either couple.

The resistance across the couples was periodically measured with results as follows:

______________________________________
[Cu--Ni Couple Resistance]
(Milliohms)
Aging Time Coated Uncoated
______________________________________
0 days 0.55
1 day 0.21
3 days 0.19
4 days 2.80
6 days 63.50
8 days 0.21
10 days 0.07
11 days 142.5
15 days 0.19
17 days 135.6
25 days 0.14
______________________________________

The results of this example show that whereas the contact resistance of the untreated couple increased rapidly, that of the coupled couple remained stable and may have actually decreased slightly after 25 days of testing.

The procedure of Example 1 was repeated with the nickel coupon being replaced with 0.00385"×1"×2" titanium (Grade 1) coupons having, after etching, a front to back resistance of about 1.75 milliohms.

Results obtained are given below:

______________________________________
[Cu--Ni Couple Resistance]
(Millohms)
Aging Time Coated Uncoated
______________________________________
4 days 2.60 170
8 days 0.95 190
______________________________________

Results comparable to Example 1 were observed. Note, however, how rapidly and to what degree the electroresistant oxide coating builds up on the titanium surface.

The procedure of Example 2 was followed with the titanium being replaced by titanium coupons containing a 0.1 micron thick layer of copper sputtered onto the mating surface. This was cleaned using the procedure for copper as detailed in Example 1.

______________________________________
[Cu--Cu Sputtered Ti Couple Resistance]
(Milliohms)
Aging Time Coated Uncoated
______________________________________
0 days 0.4
1 day 0.98 4.4
3 days 1.03
4 days 0.63 50.5
6 days 60.5
8 days 0.63
10 days 0.64
11 days 70
15 days 0.65
17 days 70
25 days 0.85
______________________________________

This shows that sputtering copper on titanium produces a system which while superior to a Cu-Ti couple will still quickly break down on long-term exposure to the temperature and pressure environmental conditions of a cell to achieve uncoated contact resistance values substantially higher than those found with coated couples.

This invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.

Dotson, Ronald L., Woodard, Jr., Kenneth E.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
5286925, Apr 18 1991 Solvay (Societe Annonyme) Electrical conductor, process for manufacturing an electrical conductor and electrode for an electrolysis cell
5944965, Jul 01 1992 NIKKO MATERIALS USA, INC Method and apparatus for sequentially metalizing polymeric films and products made thereby
6224722, Jul 01 1992 NIKKO MATERIALS USA, INC Method and apparatus for sequentially metalizing polymeric films and products made thereby
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4098606, Feb 20 1975 Institut Tehnickih Nauka Sanu Electrochemically active aluminium alloy, the method of its preparation and use
4222831, Jan 11 1979 Olin Corporation Internal gas separation assembly for high current density electrolytic cells
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Apr 03 1985Olin Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 10 1987M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247.
Jan 07 1992REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jan 10 1992REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jan 23 1992M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Jan 23 1992M186: Surcharge for Late Payment, Large Entity.
Jan 23 1992REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Mar 03 1992ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Jan 09 1996REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jun 02 1996EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Feb 04 19894 years fee payment window open
Aug 04 19896 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 04 1990patent expiry (for year 4)
Feb 04 19922 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Feb 04 19938 years fee payment window open
Aug 04 19936 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 04 1994patent expiry (for year 8)
Feb 04 19962 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Feb 04 199712 years fee payment window open
Aug 04 19976 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 04 1998patent expiry (for year 12)
Feb 04 20002 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)