In a munitions system, a cylindrical canister is fired over a target. The canister carries a target sensing infrared device and, when a target is detected, a projectile is fired downward from the bottom of the overflying missile. A spinning motion is imparted to the missile to stabilize its flight, and a wobbling motion is imparted to the missile to provide a larger target area. The projectile forms a concave lower end to the missile and is fired by an explosive charge.
|
19. A submunition munition to be launched along a ballistic trajectory to overfly a target, the submunition munition including:
a generally circular missile to be propelled over a target with a spinning motion about a near vertical axis; means for imparting a lateral precession motion to the missile relative to the target trajectory; a projectile carried by the missile and to be fired downward from the bottom of the missile toward the target; detector means carried by the missile for detecting the target; and means for propelling the projectile downward from the bottom of the missile upon detection of a target.
1. A munitions system comprising:
a missile having a projectile mounted for downward firing from the bottom of the missile; means for propelling the missile along a ballistic trajectory to overfly a target; stabilizing means for stabilizing the missile in flight with the projectile directed downward; means for imparting a lateral precession motion to the missile relative to the target trajectory; detector means carried by the missile for detecting a target below the missile; and means carried by the missile for propelling the projectile downward from the missile toward the target upon detection of the target.
2. A munitions system as claimed in
4. A munitions system as claimed in
5. A munitions system as claimed in
7. A munitions system as claimed in
8. A muntions system as claimed in
11. A munitions system as claimed in
12. A munitions system as claimed in
13. A munitions system as claimed in
14. A munitions system as claimed in
15. A munitions system as claimed in
16. A munitions system as claimed in
17. A munitions system as claimed in
18. A munitions system as claimed in
20. A submunition munition as claimed in
21. A submunition munition as claimed in
22. A submunition munition as claimed in
24. A submunition munition as claimed in
25. In a munition system for propelling a munition along a ballistic trajectory, housing means characterized by stable flight relative to an axis transverse to the trajectory when propelled along said trajectory, and means for imparting to the housing lateral precessional motion relative to said trajectory. 26. A munition system as defined in
housing means characterized by spin about an axis transverse to said trajectory when propelled along said trajectory; means for imparting to the housing means lateral precessional motion relative to said trajectory; and detector means having a field of view and carried by said housing means for scanning to sense a target in said field.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Technical Field
This invention relates to a munitions system and submunition which may be used in ground-to-ground or air-to-ground tactical warfare situations against armored vehicle targets. The subject submunition includes a missile containing a projectile.
2. Background Art
Conventional munitions designed to counter armored vehicles include both ground and air-launched projectiles which must impact the target to be effective. Accuracy of the initial launch conditions of elevation, azimuth and velocity, coupled with subsequent aerodynamics effects during the trajectory to the target, dominate the performance of these munitions. Guided munitions do not rely so heavily on the accuracy of initial launch conditions but are generally more complex and costly and potentially vulnerably vulnerable to enemy countermeasures.
An object of the present invention is to provide a submunition which is both effective and relatively inexpensive as compared to guided systems yet which offers the opportunity to search for and engage a target during its flight.
In accordance with the invention, a submunition overflies a target area following a ballistic path in a manner similar to that of a clay pigeon or "Skeet" at a shooting range. The munition carries a downward directed projectile such as a Miszray Schardin type warhead commonly known as a self-forging fragment warhead. Preferably the submunition is configured as a short cylinder, the length to diameter ratio being governed by a number of system considerations. Means such as spin imparted to the submunition provides stability during flight with the projectile directed downward. An infrared sensor or other target sensing device is embodied on the submunition to trigger the firing of the warhead when an appropriate signal is received. To increase the ground area scanned by the sensing element, a wobbling or precession motion is imparted to the submunition during its flight if such motion is warranted by the engagement scenario.
Launch of the submunition along its trajectory may be accomplished by explosive or rocket propelled ejection from a suitable launch tube or by centrifugal forces imparted by spinning of a munition delivery vehicle about an axis parallel to but offset from the munition spin axis. In the latter case, the munition receives both spinning and lateral displacement motion. Other methods of imparting spin are by a strap, a pin/groove arrangement, a friction band or rack and pinion. Wobbling motion may be imparted by an off-center bob-weight or a small explosive coning charge.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a submunitions device embodying this invention;
FIG. 2 is an exploded view of the submunitions device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 shows the submunition missile of FIGS. 1 and 2 as it is launched from a launching tube;
FIG. 4 is a plan view of the missile positioned in the launching tube of FIG. 3 and showing the strap for imparting spin to the missile with firing;
FIG. 5 shows a trace of the ground area subject to attack by a wobbling, spinning missile;
FIG. 6 is a plan view similar to FIG. 4 but showing an alternative embodiment for imparting spin to the missile by an off-center weight;
FIG. 7 is a plan view of another embodiment of imparting spin to the missile by a pin and groove;
FIG. 8 is a plan view of yet another embodiment for imparting spin including a rack and pinion;
FIG. 9 is still another means of imparting spin including a friction surface;
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the munitions device with means for imparting wobble to the spinning missile.
As shown in FIG. 1 and the exploded view of FIG. 2, a missile 12 is in the form of a canister having a cylindrical warhead housing 14. The housing 14 is separated into an explosive charge chamber 18 and an electronics chamber 20 by a recessed floor 16. Electronics in the chamber 20 are covered by a flat, end plate 22. The opposite end of the canister missile 12 is closed by a lens 24. The metal lens 24 retains an explosive charge 25 in the chamber 18 and serves as a projectile when the explosive charge is ignited.
Similar lens projectiles are used in conventional mines and the like but are directed upward. The lens is termed self-forging because, when fired, the explosive charge inverts the curvature of the lens so that the lens becomes a bullet shaped projectile. With the present arrangement, the lens 24 is directed downward to provide a concave lower end to the submunition. With the cylindrical housing 14 and flat end plate 22 the lens provides an inverted saucer configuration. The spinning inverted saucer has high stability in flight and is a source of additional lift to the missile. The stability of the spinning missile insures that the projectile, lens 24, is directed downward along the entire missile trajectory.
To senses a target, an infared target detection device with optics 26 is mounted to the outside of the housing 14. The target detection device might also be mounted within the housing. Within the electronics chamber 20, two batteries 28 and 30 serve as the power supply. Target detection electronics 31 and 32 analyze the signals received from the infrared detector and distinguish between a target, such as an armored vehicle, and background. Other suitable target detectors may, for example, be of the magnetic, optical or audio type.
A safing and arming device 34 is provided to prevent ignition of the explosive charge 25 until the safing and arming device detects the translational and angular acceleration of the missile when it is fired. To initial firing of the explosive charge 25, a precision initiater coupler 38 is provided. This initiater coupler is a small charge which is ignited upon detection of a suitable target.
In use, the missile is propelled from a launching device such as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 at a velocity of 100 to 200 feet per second to ranges of several hundred feet. The launcher is a rectangular tube 40 from which the missile 12 is fired by an explosive charge 42. To impart spin to the missile 12 about a vertical axis, a frangible strap 44 is fixed at one end to the firing tube and wrapped partially around the missile 12. The opposite end of the strap is fixed to the missile by rivets. This strap has notches 46 formed adjacent the rivets so that, as the missile leaves the tube 40, the strap breaks to disconnect the missile from the tube.
It can be noted in FIG. 3 that the strap is attached to the missile above the center of gravity. This imparts a torque in a roll plane as the strap is released. As a result, the missile spins off with precession, that is with a wobbling motion. With wobbling of the missile, the submunition scans the ground and can fire upon a larger area. This larger area is indicated by the coning action shown at 48 in FIG. 3 and by the target area with flight shown in FIG. 5. As the distance of the missile above ground increases and then decreases along its trajectory, the ground which is scanned by the infrared detector and to which the projectile 24 is directed is as shown at 50 in FIG. 5. Without wobble, the ground scanned is along a single straight line 52. It can thus be seen that the target area, or footprint, of the missile is much greater with spin and wobble. With such a large target area determined by the entire missile trajectory and the extent of the wobble, the missile need not be fired directly to, or even directly over, a target. This greatly reduces the accuracy required for single shot firing of a cannon or mortar, and it reduces the number of devices which must be fired with random firing. Because fewer devices must be fired, each device can be provided with increased munitions capacity. Also, the projectile 24 is fired directly or almost directly downward onto the target. The top of the target is often its most vulnerable side.
To insure that any target within the footprint of the missile be detected, the maximum interscan spacing 54 in the firing path 50 must be less than the expected target width. To that end, the spin rate must be sufficient for a given velocity of the missile.
Other means for imparting spin to the missile are shown in FIGS. 6-9. In FIG. 6, a weight 56 increases the inertia on that side of the missile. That side thus has a slower acceleration, and spin is imparted.
In FIG. 7, a pin 58 on the missile is guided by a groove 60 in the launching tube 40. When the missile is fired, the pin follows the groove and thus imparts spin. The groove may be opened at its terminal end or the pin may be frangible. Alternatively, the groove may be in the missile and the pin may be secured to the launching tube 40.
In FIG. 9, complementary teeth on the missile and in the launching tube 40 provide a rack and pinion effect. And in FIG. 8 a high friction surface 66 to one side of the launching tube 40 provides a similar effect.
Rather than by placing the spin imparting means off center, wobble can be separately induced. For example, a small coning charge may be fired after the missile has been launched. The charge would be positioned on the missile to provide torque in a roll plane. FIG. 10 shows another means for imparting wobble to the spinning missile. A bob 68 is positioned at the end of a hinged support arm 70 such as a rod or a flexible line. After the missile is launched centrifugal force from the spin of the missile causes the bob to swing outwardly. Since the arm is connected off center, the missile wobbles. The frequency of the wobble can be changed by adjusting the length of the arm 70.
In each of the embodiments described, the missile 12 is fired over a target. When the target is sensed, the explosive charge 25 carried by the missile is ignited and a projectile 24 is propelled downward onto the target. As already noted, in many cases the top of a target is more vulnerable than the front or sides. Thus, a projectile fired from above has greater effect. Also, the trajectory of the missile is not significant so long as the target is in the target area of FIG. 5.
It should be recognized that the projectile 24 may be of any type. For example, it may be solid or fragmentary, and it may carry its own explosive charge.
The missile need not be launched by means of an explosive charge. For example, a centrifugal release of the missile is feasible. Also, the launcher need not be located on the ground. It may, for example, be dropped by parachute with a plurality of missiles launched as the launcher falls toward the ground.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Henderson, David, Atanasoff, John V., Clark, W. Kenneth, Wreghitt, Kenneth W.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 11287233, | Aug 31 2018 | Bae Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration INC | Ballistic range adjustment using coning commands |
| 6666145, | Nov 16 2001 | Textron Innovations Inc | Self extracting submunition |
| 6834593, | Nov 16 2001 | Textron Systems Corporation | Self extracting submunition |
| 9019375, | Jul 10 2012 | The Boeing Company | Target locator and interceptor imaging and sensing assembly, system and method |
| 9204104, | Jul 10 2012 | The Boeing Company | Imaging and sensing assembly, system and method |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 2925965, | |||
| 3264985, | |||
| 3380687, | |||
| 3818833, | |||
| 4050381, | Apr 12 1972 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Low density indirect fire munition system (U) |
| 4160415, | May 05 1978 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Target activated projectile |
| 4172407, | Aug 25 1978 | Hughes Missile Systems Company | Submunition dispenser system |
| 4242962, | Jan 02 1979 | Raytheon Company | Antitank weapon system and elements therefor |
| 4264045, | Sep 04 1979 | Textron Systems Corporation | Despinning method and apparatus |
| 4492166, | Apr 28 1977 | Martin Marietta Corporation | Submunition having terminal trajectory correction |
| GB1193304, | |||
| GB1298931, | |||
| GB1444029, | |||
| GB1477097, | |||
| GB1545148, | |||
| GB2006400, | |||
| GB2006935, | |||
| GB2039445, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Oct 31 1984 | Avco Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Jun 25 1997 | Avco Corporation | Textron Systems Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 008587 | /0462 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Mar 25 1989 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Sep 25 1989 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Mar 25 1990 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Mar 25 1992 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Mar 25 1993 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Sep 25 1993 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Mar 25 1994 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Mar 25 1996 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Mar 25 1997 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Sep 25 1997 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Mar 25 1998 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Mar 25 2000 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |