An optical smoke detector having a conical masking body located directly between a light source and a light receiver. The masking body is provided with a reflecting surface so that rays from the light source are diverted into a reaction zone to supplement direct rays from the light source to the zone. In one embodiment the reflecting surface is cuspidate while in another embodiment a second masking body is added which shadows the light receiver from viewing the base of the first masking body.

Patent
   RE32105
Priority
Nov 19 1984
Filed
Nov 19 1984
Issued
Apr 01 1986
Expiry
Nov 19 2004
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
12
10
EXPIRED
1. A particle detector comprising:
a source of light directed on a first path accessible to particles;
a photocell having a photosensitive area viewing on a second path into a zone of intersection of the two paths and responsive to light scattered from particles in the zone; and
a body masking direct light from the source to the photosensitive area and having a periphery outside which light passes to the intersection zone;
wherein the detector includes a reflective surface disposed between the masking body periphery and the light source having reflective components at an angle relative to direct rays from the source toward the masking body such as to direct such rays away from the body into a substantial value volume of the intersection zone; and
wherein the reflective surface is a cone like surface extending to and integral with the masking periphery.
2. A detector according to claim 1 wherein the reflective surface is a surface of axial revolution.
3. A detector according to claim 2 wherein the reflective surface is a surface of revolution of a curved line.
4. A detector according to claim 2 wherein the light source and photocell are on the axis of revolution.
5. A detector according to claim 1 wherein the surface has a conical apex directed toward the light source and the surface flares away from the light source.

With the type of optical smoke detector in which smoke scatters light from an exciter lamp to a photocell there is a choice of disposing lamp and cell so that light is scattered backward or forward from the smoke as in Kompelien, U.S. Pat. No. 3,185,975. Forward scatter disposition has the advantage that particles scatter more incident light forward than backward, but on the other hand requires that light from the lamp must be masked from direct paths to the photocell, as in Hall, U.S. Pat. No. 3,409,885. The masking means hitherto has absorbed a substantial amount of the source light (as is recognized in Tresch, U.S. Pat. No. 4,181,439). This involves an energy loss of considerable importance in battery powered smoke detectors widely used in residences.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a forward scatter type of smoke or other particle detector which conserves light energy.

According to the invention a particle detector comprises a source of light directed on a first path accessible to particles; a photocell having a photosensitive area viewing on a second path into a zone of intersection of the two paths and responsive to light scattered from particles in the zone; and a body masking direct light from the source to the photosensitive area and having a periphery outside which light passes to the intersection zone; wherein the detector includes a reflective surface disposed between the masking body periphery and the light source having reflective components at an angle relative to direct rays from the source toward the masking body such as to direct such rays away from the body into the intersection zone.

The term photocell is meant to include all photoelectric cells including those of the tube, resistance, voltaic and diode types.

Preferably the reflective surface is cone like, by which is meant conical and cuspidate surfaces, usually surfaces of revolution. The reflective surface may, however, be planar, that is a flat or warped plane.

FIG. 1 is a schematic sectional view of one form of smoke detector; and

FIGS. 2 and 3 are similar schematic views of other forms of detector.

As shown in FIG. 1 a forward scatter, optical smoke detector comprises a housing 1 which encloses a dark reaction chamber to which smoke has access through louvres 2 or a modern baffle system, such as is shown in Marsocci et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,206,366. At one end of the dark chamber is a lamp L which may have spaced or integral lenses associated with it, and which is lighted by a steady or pulsed power source 3. At the other end of the chamber is a photocell PC having a photosensitive area PA. The cell is connected to amplifying, threshold and alarm circuits 4, such as are shown in Cooper, U.S. Pat. No. 4,193,069, driving an alarm horn H. On an axis A through the lamp L and cell PA is located a conical masking body M which shields the photosensitive area PA from the direct rays from the lamp L.

The lamp, mask and cell define three optical patterns. From the lamp light is directed by the lamp lens on a hollow conical path C whose scope is from about 90° to either side of the lamp to innermost rays C1 which pass the periphery of the masking body M. The photocell PC views the dark chamber on a second hollow conical path bounded by the housing 1 on the outside and the innermost lines P1 masking body M on its inside. The two paths overlap in the dotted intersection or reaction zone Z which is the reaction volume in which smoke particles scatter light from the source lamp L to the photocell PC. If the masking body presented a flat, light absorbing surface to the lamp L up to fifty percent of the light would be wasted.

According to the present invention the light normally wasted by absorption in the mask M is retrieved by providing a reflecting surface R between the forward surface of the masking body M and the lamp L. In FIG. 1 the surface is a simple conical surface of revolution about the axis A. This reflective surface is disposed at such an angle that rays from the lamp toward the masking body which were previously wasted by absorption or reflection out of the view of the cell are diverted into the intersection or reaction zone Z where they supplement the direct rays from the lamp to the zone and increase the sensitivity of the detector to smoke.

FIG. 2 illustrates forms of the invention in which the reflecting surface R* is not conical but still cone like or cuspidate. A cuspidate warped planar surface or a cuspidate surface of revolution of a curved line reflects light more efficiently into the intersection zone.

The periphery M4 of the masking disc M nearest the photocell can act as an undesirable light scatterer, particularly if dust builds up on the edge or if the disc is very thin. The base of the reflecting cone of FIG. 1 presents essentially the same problem as a thin disc in scattering light around its edge, even more so if dust builds up there. This is undesirable, since if this light is bent directly to the photocell it can create a false signal that might cause a false alarm or at least reduce the ratio of signals between the alarm and clear air condition (reduced signal to unwanted noise signal ratio). FIG. 3 shows the addition of a second masking body M2 which shadows the photocell from viewing the base of the first masking body M so that light scattered at the latter's edge M4 is inside the innermost lines P1* of the view of the cell and will not be detected. It is also necessary to place the second disc in the shadow of the first disc inside the innermost lamp rays C1 with its periphery M3 shielding the periphery M4 of the first body M so that the light from the lamp cannot illuminate its edge. It is further desirable to minimize the reduction in angle-of-view of the photocell by the second masking body, so as not to appreciably reduce system efficiency.

It should be understood that the present disclosure is for the purpose of illustration only and that this invention includes all modifications and equivalents which fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Enemark, Robert B.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10809173, Dec 15 2017 Analog Devices, Inc. Smoke detector chamber boundary surfaces
10921367, Mar 06 2019 Analog Devices, Inc Stable measurement of sensors methods and systems
11747272, Jun 10 2019 Analog Devices, Inc Gas detection using differential path length measurement
11788942, Dec 15 2017 Analog Devices, Inc Compact optical smoke detector system and apparatus
11796445, May 15 2019 Analog Devices, Inc Optical improvements to compact smoke detectors, systems and apparatus
11821836, Jul 13 2020 Analog Devices, Inc. Fully compensated optical gas sensing system and apparatus
4754150, Aug 23 1984 C O NOHMI BOSAI KOGYO CO , LTD , 7-3, KUDAN-MINAMI 4-CHOME, CHIYODA-KU, TOKYO, JAPAN, A CORP OF JAPAN Photoelectric smoke detector
5568130, Sep 30 1994 Fire detector
6778091, Jan 09 2001 SimplexGrinnell LP Smoke chamber
D907515, Nov 06 2018 Analog Devices, Inc Smoke detector chamber
D918756, Nov 06 2018 Analog Devices, Inc Smoke detector boundary
D920825, Nov 06 2018 Analog Devices, Inc Smoke detector chamber
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3185975,
3409885,
3710365,
3787703,
4111564, Feb 08 1973 SPECTRA-PHYSICS LASERPLANE, INC , A DE CORP Reference plane production
4181439, Apr 01 1976 Cerberus AG Smoke detector with a conical ring-shaped radiation region
4230950, May 16 1979 Honeywell Inc. Electro-optic smoke detector
4241282, Nov 21 1977 Cerberus AG Smoke detector with bimetallic element for temperature compensation
4269510, Dec 21 1978 Cerberus AG Smoke detector
GB1533192,
//////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 19 1984American District Telegraph Company(assignment on the face of the patent)
May 13 1986American District Telegraph CompanyADT, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0050770275 pdf
Feb 29 1988ADT, INC ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0050910837 pdf
Dec 31 1988ADT DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0052080081 pdf
Jan 03 1989ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC ADT DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC ,CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS JANUARY 6, 1989 NEW JERSEY0050910824 pdf
Jan 03 1992SENTROL ACQUISITION CORP A CORP OF DELAWARE MERGED INTO SENTROL, INC A CORP OF OREGONMERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS EFFECTIVE ON 12 31 1991OR0060710296 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Aug 10 1987M170: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 96-517.
Sep 10 1991REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Feb 09 1992EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 01 19894 years fee payment window open
Oct 01 19896 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 01 1990patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 01 19922 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 01 19938 years fee payment window open
Oct 01 19936 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 01 1994patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 01 19962 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 01 199712 years fee payment window open
Oct 01 19976 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 01 1998patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 01 20002 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)