A foundry moulding composition comprising
(a) a granular refractory material,
(b) from 0.25 to 2.5% based on the weight of the refractory material of an aqueous solution of a potassium alkali phenol-formaldehyde resin, said aqueous solution having a solids content of from 50 to 75% and said resin having a weight average molecular weight (Mwr) of from 700 to 2000, a formaldehyde:phenol molar ratio of from 1.2:1 to 2.6:1 and a potassium hydroxide:phenol molar ratio of from 0.5:1 to 1.2:1;
(c) from 0.05 to 3% based on the weight of said aqueous solution, of at least one silane, and
(d) from 20 to 110% based on the weight of said aqueous solution of at least one ester active to catalyze curing of said resin.
|
1. A foundry moulding composition comprising
(a) a granular refractory material, (b) from 0.25 to 2.5% based on the weight of the refractory material of an aqueous solution of a potassium alkali phenol-formaldehyde resin, said aqueous solution having a solids content of from 50 to 75% and said resin having a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of from 700 to 2000, a formaldehyde:phenol molar ratio of from 1.2:1 to 2.6:1 and a potassium hydroxide:phenol molar ratio of from 0.5:1 to 1.2:1; (c) from 0.05 to 3% based on the weight of said aqueous solution, of at least one silane, and (d) from 20 to 110% based on the weight of said aqueous solution of at least one ester active to catalyze curing of said resin.
13. A process for the production of foundry moulds or cores which comprises,
mixing granular refractory material with a binder, wherein said binder comprises (a) from 0.25% to 2.5% based on the weight of the refractory material of an aqueous solution of a potassium alkali phenol-formaldehyde resin, said aqueous solution having a solids content of from 50% to 75% and said resin having a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of from 700 to 2000, a formaldehyde:phenol molar ratio of from 1.2:1 to 2.6:1 and a potassium hydroxide:phenol molar ratio of from 0.5:1 to 1.2:1, (b) from 0.05% to 3% based on the weight of said aqueous solution of at least one silane, and (c) from 20% to 110% based on the weight of said aqueous solution of at least one ester active to catalyze curing of said resin, discharging the mixture into a corebox or pattern mold, and allowing the resin to cure.
2. The composition of
3. The composition of
6. The composition of
8. The composition of
9. The composition of
10. The composition of
14. The process of
15. The process of
17. The process of
18. The process of
19. The process of
20. The process of
|
This invention relates to the manufacture of foundry moulds and cores and to moulding compositions useful therein. More particularly, the invention relates to the use of highly condensed potassium alkali phenolic resins in the binders for the moulds and cores.
Phenol-formaldehyde (PF), phenol-formaldehyde/furfuryl alcohol (PF/FA), urea-formaldehyde/furfuryl alcohol (UF/FA) and furfuryl alcohol-formaldehyde condensation products, catalyzed with strong acid catalysts, such as phosphoric acid, sulphuric acid and paratoluene sulphonic acid and the like, as well known as binders for sand in the production of cold-setting foundry moulds and cores. Aromatic sulphonic acids are more commonly employed than all other types but have the disadvantage that pungent fumes of sulphur dioxide are evolved on thermal decomposition.
UF/FA condensation products contain nitrogen which can form ammonia on thermal decomposition and this tends to neutralize the sulphur dioxide. However, nitrogen in the binder can react with certain metals, such as, for example, grey and nodular irons and steel, resulting in the formation of small bubbles in the final casting, a defect known in the foundry industry as "pinholing". The employment of UF/FA binders is consequently restricted.
Phosphoric acid may be employed as a catalyst but tends to build up on the sand on repeated attrition reclamation and this reduces the refractoriness of the sand. Phosphoric acid is also incompatible with PF/FA condensation products and, as a result, the moulds and cores produced exhibit poor bond strengths.
In the foundry moulding art the use of aqueous highly alkaline phenol-aldehyde resins as binders for sand has not been developed because they tend to produce weak cores. It is known in other fields that the curing of phenol-formaldehyde resins can be catalyzed by esters. The application of this to foundry moulds and cores has been suggested in Japanese Patent publication (Kokai) No. 130627/1975 and copending U.S. application Ser. No. 224,131, filed Jan. 12, 1981, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,426,467, issued Jan. 17, 1984. Whilst these specifications show that foundry cores and moulds having adequate strength and strength increase with time can be made they require the use of relatively high proportions of resin which is costly and makes recovery of the sand, after casting, more difficult.
The present invention is based on the discovery that the use of highly condensed phenol-formaldehyde resins can give moulds and cores which have adequate strength and strength increase at much lower levels of resin. The use of such highly condensed resins in making foundry moulds and cores has not been considered practicable, heretofore.
The present invention accordingly provides a method of making a foundry mould or core which comprises mixing granular refractory material with a binder which comprises:
1. from 0.25% to 2.5% by weight of the granular refractory material of an aqueous solution, having a solids content of from 50% to 75% by weight, of a potassium alkali-phenol-formaldehyde resin having the following characteristics:
(a) a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of from 700 to 2000;
(b) a formaldehyde:phenol molar ratio of from 1.2:1 to 2.6:1; and
(c) a KOH:phenol molar ratio of from 0.5:1 to 1.2:1;
2. from 0.05% to 3% by weight on the weight of the resin solution of at least one silane; and
3. from 25% to 110% by weight of the resin solution of at least one ester active to catalyze curing of the resin;
forming the mixture and allowing the mixture to set by curing of the resin in the binder.
The moulding compositions comprising the mixture of granular refractory material and binder as set out above is believed to be novel and, accordingly, forms part of the invention.
The granular refractory materials used in the present invention may be any of the refractory materials commonly employed in the foundry industry for the production of moulds and cores, such as silica sand, quartz, chromite sand, zircon or olivine sand. The compositions of the invention have the particular advantage that the difficulties commonly associated with the bonding of sands of alkaline reaction, such as olivine and chromite, or beach sands containing shell fragments, and which arise from neutralization or partial neutralization of the acid catalyst used in conventional systems, are completely overcome, since in this invention the resin binder is cured under alkaline conditions. The invention is, therefore, of particular utility where it is necessary or desirable to employ alkaline sands.
The nature of the phenol-formaldehyde resin used is a most important feature of the present invention. There are several features of the resin which are important. Since the present invention is directed to cold set techniques, the resin binder will be used as an aqueous solution of the resin. The solids content of the aqueous solution is in the range 50 to 75% by weight. Solids contents below 50% are not used because they contain too much water which reduces the effectiveness of the binder. Solids contents above 75%, are not used because the viscosity becomes too high.
The phenol-formaldehyde resins used in this invention have a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of from 700 to 2000 and preferably from 800 to 1700. Resins with Mw less than 700, such as were used in copending U.S. Ser. No. 224,131, give products which are relatively weaker or require significantly more resin to achieve similar strengths. Resins with Mw greater than 2000 are either not adequately water soluble within the range of KOH contents used in the invention or precipitate out of solution or cause the solution to gel before the resin has cured adequately yielding products with poor strength.
Optimum results may not be obtained within the broad Mw range at the extreme limits of the ranges of KOH:phenol and formaldehyde:phenol molar ratios, especially at the lower end of the KOH:phenol ratio. We have obtained satisfactory results showing the advantage of the invention throughout the 800 to 1700 Mw range. We have, to date, obtained optimum results using resins having Mw greater than 950.
The resins used in this invention are potassium alkaline phenol-formaldehyde resins by which is meant that the alkali in the resin is potassium alkali. This alkali can be present in the resin during manufacture or, more usually, post added to resin as KOH, preferably in aqueous solution of suitable strength. The alkalinity of the resin is expressed in terms of its KOH content and specifically by the molar ratio of KOH to the phenol in the resin. Other alkalis are not expressly excluded and may be present in minor amounts but will not be specifically added because they slow curing of the resin and give products having lower strength. We have found that substituting the KOH used in the invention by an equimolar amount of NaOH gives cores which typically have half the strength after 1 hour and only achieve two third the strength after 24 hours of cores made using KOH as the alkali.
The molar ratio of KOH:phenol in the resin solution is in the range 0.5:1 to 1.2:1 and preferably 0.6:1 to 1.2:1. At ratios less than 0.5 the speed of cure and product strength are much reduced. The reasons for this are not entirely clear but it seems probable that at such low ratios resin tends to be insoluble or precipitates from solution during curing. Also we believe that a relatively high KOH:phenol ratio increases the concentration of phenolate type anions which enhances activity of the resin to curing by cross-linking. Ratios higher than 1.2 are not used because the excess KOH makes the resins hazardous to handle and inhibits curing by oversolubilizing the resin and/or reducing the effect of ester catalysis. The use of KOH:phenol ratios lower than 0.6 is not preferred with resins having Mw less than 800 because the speed of cure and product strength is below optimum.
The resins used have a formaldehyde to phenol molar ratio of from 1.2:1 to 2.6:1. Lower ratios are not used because lower strengths are obtained in use. Higher ratios are not used because they are either of low molecular weight, or are excessively crosslinked, or contain undesirably high levels of unreacted formaldehyde. Especially, within the preferred limits of this ratio suitable highly condensed resins, with low levels of unreacted formaldehyde and high reactivity can be obtained.
It is a subsidiary aspect of this invention that the resin used satisfies the following criteria:
(a) Mw from 800 to 1700;
(b) KOH:phenol molar ratio 0.6:1 to 1.2:1; and
(c) formaldehyde:phenol molar rato 1.2:1 to 2.6:1.
The curing catalyst used in the invention is an ester. Suitable esters include low molecular weight lactones e.g., γ-butyrolactone, propiolactone, and ξ-caprolactone, and esters of short and medium chain e.g. C1 to C10 alkyl mono- or polyhydric alcohols, with short or medium chain e.g. C1 to C10 carboxylic acids especially acetic acid. We have obtained very good results using triacetin (glyceryl triacetate) as the catalyst.
The amount of catalyst used in the range 20% to 110%, preferably 25% to 40% by weight on the weight of resin solution used, corresponding approximately to 10% to 80% by weight on the weight of solid resin in the solution. The optimum in any particular case will depend on the ester chosen and the properties of the resin. The mechanism of catalysis is not certain but we believe that it involves the initial nucleophilic attack by anionic sites in the resin on the ester which activates the resin to crosslinking reactions in the presence of the alkali.
A silane is included in the mixture to improve product strength. Amounts as low as 0.05% by weight on the weight of resin solution provide a significant improvement in strength. Increasing the amount of silane gives greater improvements in strength up to about 0.6% by weight of the resin solution. Higher silane concentrations are not preferred because of added cost. Further, because the silane typically used is δ-aminopropyltriethoxy silane which contains nitrogen, use of excess silane may increase the risk of pinholing defects and for these reasons amounts in excess of 3% by weight on the resin solution are not used.
The following Examples illustrate the invention. The techniques used in the Examples are described below:
100% phenol was dissolved in 50% aqueous KOH in an amount corresponding to the desired KOH:phenol molar ratio (from 0.5 to 1.2). The solution was heated to reflux and 50% aqueous formaldehyde was added slowly, whilst maintaining reflux, in an amount corresponding to the desired formaldehyde:phenol molar ratio (1.6, 1.8 or 2.0). The reaction mixture was maintained under reflux until it attained a pre-determined viscosity corresponding to the desired value of Mw. (If desired the solids content can be adjusted by distillation, but this is not usually necessary, a further advantage of the invention. In some cases minor amounts of KOH solution were added to adjust the KOH:phenol ratio, but this would not be necessary in full scale production.) The resin solution was cooled to 40°C and 0.4% by weight on the weight of the resin solution of δ-aminopropyl triethoxy silane was added.
(a) viscosity--measured using an Ostwald (U-tube) viscometer at 25° C.
(b) solids content--measured by heating a weighed sample (2.0±0.1 g) in an air circulating oven for 3 hrs at 100°C
(c) Molecular weight (Mw)--measured using gel permeation chromatography. Samples were prepared by precipitating resin from the resin solution by adding H2 SO4 ; separating, washing and drying the precipitate and dissolving it in tetrahydrofuran.
1 kg of the selected sand was charged to a Fordath laboratory coremixer. The ester catalyst was added and mixed for 1 min and the resin solution was then added. Mixing was continued for 1 min and the mixture then quickly discharged into the test moulds. One sample was rammed into a waxed paper cup which was squeezed by hand to assess the bench life and when setting had occurred. Other samples were formed into 5×5 cm cylindrical test cores by the standard method recommended by I.B.F. working party P. The test cores were placed in a standard atmosphere, 20°C; 50% relative humidity, and samples were tested for compression strength 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr and 24 hr after manufacture. All compression test cores were made within 2 minutes of discharge of the mix.
In the Examples tests designated with a letter (tests A to F) are comparative tests outside the invention, tests designated with a number (1 to 22) are of the invention.
This Example illustrates the effect of phenol-formaldehyde resin Mw on core performance.
Test cores were made from the following starting materials
Phenol-formaldehyde resin solution
Mw --variable--see Table 1
Formaldehyde:phenol molar ratio 2:1
KOH:phenol molar ratio 0.85:1
Solids 65% by weight
Amount 1.5% by weight on sand.
Sand--Chelford 50
Silane--0.4% by weight on resin solution of γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane.
Catalyst 30% by weight on resin solution of triacetin (0.45% on sand)
The values of Mw and test results are set out in Table 1. Tests A and B are of resins outside the Mw range of this invention. The results show that the benefit of the invention is obtained within a restricted range of Mw.
TABLE 1 |
______________________________________ |
Test No. |
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 B |
______________________________________ |
--Mw |
560 718 849 966 1050 1217 1320 ∞(3) |
Viscosity |
-- 81 111 144 167 321 364 501 |
(cSt) |
Bench Life |
65 23 19 16 14(2) |
10 10 2 |
(mins) |
Set Time |
180 32 28 22 22(2) |
16 15 3 |
(mins) |
Com- |
pression |
Strength |
(kPa)(1) |
1 hr 0 690 1580 2070 2050(2) |
2465 2415 0 |
2 hr 0 1950 2765 2960 2685(2) |
3000 3000 0 |
4 hr 0 2860 3200 3520 2750(2) |
3300 3300 0 |
24 hr 1480 4785 4800 5000 4650(2) |
4400 4400 800 |
______________________________________ |
(1) "0" figures for Compression strength mean that the resin had not |
set at the test time or the core was soft. |
(2) Average of 2 runs |
(3) "∞" means the --Mw is >2000 and was too high to |
measure by the method used. |
Example 1 was repeated using resins having a lower KOH:phenol molar ratio.
Phenol-formaldehyde resin solution
e,ovs/M/ w --variable--see Table 2
KOH:phenol molar ratio 0.65:1
formaldehyde:phenol molar ratio 2:1
Solids 66% by weight
Amount 1.5% by weight on sand.
Sand--Chelford 50
Silane--0.4% by weight on resin solution of γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane
Catalyst 30% by weight on resin solution of triacetin.
The values of Mw and test results are set out in Table 2. The results are similar to those of Example 1. The result of Test No. 7 could be improved using γ-butyrolactone as the catalyst.
TABLE 2 |
______________________________________ |
Test No. 7 8 9 10 |
______________________________________ |
--Mw 718 849 966 1050 |
Viscosity (cSt) |
107 202 320 405 |
Bench Life (mins) |
35 24 18 15 |
Set Time (mins) |
70 40 30 26 |
Compression |
Strength (kPa) |
1 hr 0 740 1085 1285 |
2 hr 590 1600 1875 2200 |
4 hr 1085 2350 2650 2900 |
24 hr 3000 4400 4350 5000 |
______________________________________ |
This Example illustrates the use of different levels of and different catalysts and gives a comparison with the system of U.S. Ser. No. 224,131, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,426,467, issued Jan. 17, 1984.
TABLE 3 |
______________________________________ |
Test No. 11 12 C(3) |
______________________________________ |
--Mw 966 966 560 |
Viscosity (cSt) 144 144 ca 70 |
KOH:phenol 0.85 0.85 0.52 |
formaldehyde:phenol |
2 2 1.8 |
Solids (%) 64 64 68.1 |
Amount of binder (%)(1) |
1.4 1.33 2.1 |
Catalyst(2) γ-Bu |
TAc γ-Bu |
Amount of Catalyst (%) |
30 25 32 |
Bench Life (mins) 3 18 5 |
Set Time (mins) 5 24 8 |
Compression Strength (kPa) |
1 hr 2320 1725 1725 |
2 hr 2950 2765 2450 |
4 hr 3300 3500 3350 |
24 hr 4500 5000 4800 |
______________________________________ |
Test C is Example 6 of U.S. Ser. No. 224,131 .now U.S. Pat. |
No. 4,426,467, issued JAN. 17, 1984 |
(1) Amount of Binder is solids content of binder including resin |
alkali and catalyst as % by weight on sand |
(2) Bu = butyrolactone TActriacetin |
(3) For Test C the data are based on the resin solution i.e. the |
combination of the 6 parts of resin and the 2.4 parts of 50% KOH solution |
This Example illustrates the effect of variation of the KOH:phenol molar ratio.
Phenol-formaldehyde resin solution.
Mw 966
formaldehyde:phenol molar ratio 2:1
KOH:phenol molar ratio-variable-see Table 4.
Solids 64% by weight
Amount varies to maintain solid organic resin to sand ratio--see Table 4.
Sand--Chelford 50
Silane 0.4% by weight on resin solution of γ-aminotriethoxy silane
Catalyst 30% by weight on resin solution of triacetin.
The Results are set out in Table 4.
TABLE 4 |
______________________________________ |
Test No. 13 14 15 16 17 |
______________________________________ |
KOH:phenol molar |
0.34 0.51 0.68 0.85 1.02 |
ratio |
Wt % resin 1.33 1.41 1.5 1.59 1.67 |
solution on sand |
Bench life (mins) |
30 18 15 12 9 |
Set Time (mins) |
100 29 23 19 15 |
Compression |
Strength (kPa) |
1 hr 0 890 2070 2615 2465 |
2 hr 200 1625 2715 3305 3110 |
4 hr 440 2220 3355 3550 3395 |
24 hr 1875 3995 5032 4537 4271 |
______________________________________ |
This Example further illustrates the variation of KOH:phenol molar ratio at lower formaldehyde:phenol (f:phenol) molar ratios and values of Mw. The results are set out in Table 5. In all cases the resin solution was used at 1.5% by weight on the sand and including 0.4% by weight on the resin solution of γ-aminopropyltriethoxy silane. The catalyst was triacetin 30% by weight on the resin solution.
TABLE 5 |
______________________________________ |
Test No. D 18 E 19 F 20 21 22 |
______________________________________ |
--Mw |
650 800 720 950 650 900 1100 1603 |
Viscosity |
191 276 478 460 600 414 277 350 |
(cSt) |
Solids (%) |
62.7 63.2 63.2 66.1 65.4 66.2 60.2 58 |
f:phenol ratio |
1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 |
KOH:phenol |
0.46 0.79 0.46 0.79 0.45 0.79 0.79 0.75 |
ratio |
Bench Life |
60 14 35 10 45 20 12 11 |
(mins) |
Set Time 220 20 90 16 120 35 18 15 |
(mins) |
Compression |
(kPa) |
1 hr 0 2465 0 2515 0 1235 1875 2270 |
2 hr 0 3100 350 3300 150 2200 2860 3060 |
4 hr 150 3350 790 3300 350 2800 3300 3500 |
24 hr 1240 4500 2660 4000 2150 4000 4600 4685 |
______________________________________ |
While the invention has been disclosed in this patent application by reference to the details of preferred embodiments of the invention, it is to be understood that this disclosure is intended in an illustrative rather than in a limiting sense, as it is contemplated that modifications will readily occur to those skilled in the art, within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the appended claims.
Lemon, Peter H. R. B., Railton, Jeffrey D., Baker, Derek W., Coppock, Vincent J.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4994505, | Nov 15 1988 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC | Binder compositions comprising low molecular weight poly(orthomethylolated) phenolic compound and novolac resin |
5051454, | Dec 22 1988 | HA-INTERNATIONAL, LLC | Phenolic resin compositions |
5096983, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION | Method for making a phenolic resole resin composition having extended work life |
5145887, | Apr 04 1991 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION | High surface area magnesia as hardener for phenolic resins |
5179177, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC | Method for retarding ambient temperature hardening of a phenolic resin composition |
5182346, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC | Accelerators for curing phenolic resole resins |
5182347, | Nov 21 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION | Accelerators for refractory magnesia |
5214079, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC | Accelerators for curing phenolic resole resins |
5214111, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC | Retarders for curing phenolic resole resins |
5218010, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION | Accelerators for refractory magnesia |
5223554, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION | Accelerators for curing phenolic resole resins |
5248707, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC | Accelerators for refractory magnesia |
5294649, | Aug 02 1990 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION | Accelerators for curing phenolic resole resins |
5340888, | Dec 22 1988 | BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION | Phenolic resin composition |
5378793, | Oct 25 1991 | MOMENTIVE SPECIALTY CHEMICALS UK LIMITED | Process for hardening phenolic resins |
5602192, | Jul 05 1990 | Kao Corporation | Process for producing sand mold |
5621036, | Feb 21 1995 | HA-INTERNATIONAL, LLC | Bound multi-component sand additive |
5864003, | Jul 23 1996 | Georgia-Pacific Chemicals LLC | Thermosetting phenolic resin composition |
5962567, | Feb 21 1995 | HA-INTERNATIONAL, LLC | Bound multi-component sand additive |
5962603, | Jul 23 1996 | Georgia-Pacific Chemicals LLC | Intumescent composition and method |
6172133, | Jun 25 1996 | Kao Corporation | Caking additive composition for forming self-hardening mold |
6228914, | Jan 02 1998 | NeoGraf Solutions, LLC | Intumescent composition and method |
6505671, | Dec 28 2000 | HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, INC | Method for producing a sand core |
6582819, | Jul 22 1998 | WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS THE CURRENT COLLATERAL AGENT | Low density composite proppant, filtration media, gravel packing media, and sports field media, and methods for making and using same |
6632527, | Jul 22 1998 | WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS THE CURRENT COLLATERAL AGENT | Composite proppant, composite filtration media and methods for making and using same |
7270879, | Apr 15 2003 | WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS THE CURRENT COLLATERAL AGENT | Particulate material containing thermoplastics and methods for making and using the same |
7508858, | Apr 30 2007 | The Research Foundation of State University of New York | Detuned duo-cavity laser-modulator device and method with detuning selected to minimize change in reflectivity |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2313674, | |||
2967789, | |||
3234159, | |||
3254038, | |||
3599433, | |||
3642503, | |||
3676392, | |||
3696622, | |||
3720642, | |||
3920460, | |||
4011186, | Feb 18 1976 | Monsanto Company | Aqueous resole resin solutions having dispersed inert salts |
4240948, | Nov 30 1979 | SOLUTIA INC | Accelerated resole binder |
4256623, | Jul 06 1978 | Dynamit Nobel Aktiengesellschaft | Binding agents prepared from resins containing adhesivizing agents of long shelf life |
4426467, | Jan 12 1981 | Borden Chemical UK Limited | Foundry molding compositions and process |
4433120, | Sep 30 1981 | BORDEN CHEMICAL COMPANY CANADA LIMITED,THE, DOMINION OF CANADA CORP | Liquid phenolic resin composition and method for waferboard manufacture |
DE1065605, | |||
DE1171606, | |||
DE1252853, | |||
DE2829669, | |||
EP27333, | |||
EP146499, | |||
GB2059972, | |||
JP4916793, | |||
JP50130627, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 06 1986 | Borden (UK) Limited | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 08 1996 | BORDEN UK LIMITED | Borden Chemical UK Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 007815 | /0614 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 09 1992 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 28 1992 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 29 1996 | M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 12 1996 | R169: Refund of Excess Payments Processed. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 27 1991 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 27 1992 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 27 1992 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 27 1994 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 27 1995 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 27 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 27 1996 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 27 1998 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 27 1999 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 27 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 27 2000 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 27 2002 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |