A vibratory angular rate sensor system preferably consists of a Z-cut quartz plate forming a mounting frame with a rectangular opening. Within the opening are mounted two pairs of tines. Each pair of tines is parallel to each other, one pair forming the drive tines and the other pair the output tines. Each corresponding set of two tines is disposed along the same axis having a common stem or base. The tines are secured by four bridges integral with the frame and connected to the stem. The arrangement is such that the pair of input tines vibrates in opposition to each other, while the pair of output tines vibrates with one tine going up while the other moves downwardly. As a result, the angular rate sensors drive frequency and the structural torque frequency are unequal. Therefore large displacements of the stem are unnecessary. An angular rate sensor having a support structure and first and second forks each lying in a plane each having an axis of symmetry with each fork having first and second spaced apart tines. The first and second forks are mechanically coupled to each other to provide a dual fork structure. A mount is provided for mounting the dual fork structure on the support structure. Energy is coupled into the first fork of the dual fork structure to cause vibratory motion of the tines of that fork in the plane of the fork. vibratory motion of the tines of the other fork in a direction normal to the plane of the other fork is sensed to provide a angular rate about the measure axis of symmetry of the first fork. The mounting serves to isolate the dual fork structure from the support structure.
|
1. A vibratory angular rate sensor system comprising:
(a) a mounting, frame of substantially rectangular configuration having a substantially rectangular opening said frame mounting consisting of a piezoelectric material of Z-cut crystalline quartz; (b) a first pair and a second pair of tines forming a tine structure, disposed in said opening said first pair forming vibrating drive tines, vibrating toward and away from each other in a plane of motion and said second pair of tines forming vibrating output tines, vibrating in directions perpendicular to said plane of motion opposite directions up and down; (c) a stem interconnecting means interconnecting said first and second pair pairs of tines to effect an interdependency between the first and second pairs of tines whereby motion in one pair of tines is transferred to the other pair of tines, the tines of each pair being disposed parallel to each other and corresponding tines of both pairs each pair being disposed along a common axis; (d) means including two pairs of input electrodes in contact with the first pair of tines for exciting said tines substantially at the resonant frequency thereof, said input electrodes being in the X-Y and Y-Z planes of said wafer; (e) means including two pairs of output electrodes disposed in contact with the second pair of tines in the Y-Z plane for deriving an output signal representative of the angular rate experienced by said system, the flexural resonant frequency of said first pair of tines being lower than different from that of said second pair of tines and (f) a plurality of bridges, bridge means integral with said frame mounting and connected to said stem means interconnecting said first and second pairs of tines for supporting said first and second pairs of tines on said mounting.
2. A system as defined in
3. A system as defined in
first and second tines. 5. A system as defined in claim 4 wherein said bridge means is disposed intermediate the first and second pairs of tines. 6. A system as defined in claim 1 wherein the resonant frequency of said first pair of tines is lower than that of the second pair of tines. 7. An angular rate sensor comprising a support structure, first and second forks each lying in a plane and each having an axis of symmetry, each fork having first and second spaced apart tines, means mechanically coupling the first and second forks to each other to provide a dual fork structure to effect an interdependency between the first and second forks whereby motion in one fork is transferred to the other fork, mounting means including isolation means for mounting the dual fork structure on the support structure, means for coupling energy into said first fork of the dual fork structure to cause vibratory motion of the tines of said first fork in the plane of said first fork to provide a drive fork, said isolation means serving to isolate said vibratory motion of the dual fork structure from vibratory motion of the support structure, and means for sensing vibratory motion of the tines of said second fork independent of relative motion between the support structure and the dual fork structure in a direction normal to the plane of said second fork to provide a sense fork separate from the drive fork to give a measure of the input angular rate applied to the dual fork structure about the major axis of symmetry of said first fork. 8. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein the resonant frequency of said vibratory motion of the tines of said drive fork is different from the resonant frequency of said vibratory motion of the tines of said sense fork. 9. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein said dual fork structure is formed of a piezoelectric material. 10. A rate sensor as in claim 9 wherein said mounting means is formed of a piezoelectric material. 11. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein said dual fork structure and said mounting means are formed of a single sheet of single crystal piezoelectric material. 12. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein said mounting means supports the dual fork structure in a region intermediate the first and second forks. 13. A rate sensor as in claim 12 wherein said mounting means in combination with the dual fork structure has a resonant frequency which is substantially the same frequency as said vibratory motion of the tines of the first fork. 14. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein the first and second forks have a common axis of symmetry. 15. A rate sensor as in claim 14 wherein the first and second forks lie in a common plane. 16. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein at least a portion of the mounting means is constructed so that it has an extremely small displacement relative to the displacement of the first and second forks. |
36 in FIG. 1. The rotation in the X-Y plane may be caused by the angular motion of the vehicle carrying the system. As a result, the stem 16 is twisted due to the Coriolis force which acts normal to the plane of vibration of tines 12 and 13. This, in turn, causes an up-and-down motion of the output thines 14, 15 in opposition directions.
It should be noted that the Y-Z flexural frequency is higher than the X-Y flexural frequency. Stated another way, a torque is felt by the stem 16. This, in turn, initiates or drives an Y-Z flexure in output tines 14, 15. This is so because the frequency is substantially similar to that of the tuning fork consisting of tines 12, 13. The X-Y flexure in tines 12 and 13 is piezoelectrically driven by the input electrodes 20 to 23 of FIG. 3. On the other hand, the Y-Z flexure caused by a rotation about the axis Y in tines 14, 15 is picked up piezoelectrically by the output electrodes 26 to 30 of FIG. 5.
The bridges 17, 18 have an X-Z flexural frequency which is substantially that of the flexural frequency of the tines 12, 13.
The electrodes and shielding connections for the input and output circuits are preferably made from the bridges 17, 18. It should be noted that the frequency and balance of the two pairs of tines 12, 13 and 14, 15 are adjusted by adding or removing material, such as a gold film, at the free ends of the tines on the appropriate sides. This may be effected by chemical etching or by a laser beam.
The rate sensors of the prior art depend on the flexural frequency of the drive tines being substantially the same as the torsional frequency of the entire system. According to the present invention, the drive frequency of the angular rate sensor and the structural torisonal frequency are not the same. Therefore, large displacements of the stem 16 are not necessary. The displacement of the stem 16 is extremely small relative to that of the pickup or output tines 14, 15. This is due to the Q multiplication of the displacement of the tines with respect to the entire structure. It will now be understood that the vibration of the angular rate sensor is easily isolated from the mounting frame 10 and hence from the environment.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5193391, | Nov 14 1990 | Controlled vibration angular rate sensor | |
5331852, | Sep 11 1991 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Electromagnetic rebalanced micromechanical transducer |
5349855, | Apr 07 1992 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.; CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC , THE, A MA CORP | Comb drive micromechanical tuning fork gyro |
5357817, | Apr 19 1990 | Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Wide bandwidth stable member without angular accelerometers |
5361036, | Aug 12 1993 | BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Complex digital demodulator employing Chebychev-approximation derived synthetic sinusoid generation |
5388458, | Nov 24 1992 | CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC , THE | Quartz resonant gyroscope or quartz resonant tuning fork gyroscope |
5396144, | Aug 02 1993 | BEI SENSORS & SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC , A CORP OF DELAWARE | Rotation rate sensor with center mounted tuning fork |
5408119, | Oct 17 1990 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Monolithic micromechanical vibrating string accelerometer with trimmable resonant frequency |
5408877, | Mar 16 1992 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical gyroscopic transducer with improved drive and sense capabilities |
5426970, | Aug 02 1993 | BEI SENSORS & SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC , A CORP OF DELAWARE | Rotation rate sensor with built in test circuit |
5444641, | Sep 24 1993 | BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Admittance-parameter estimator for a piezoelectric resonator in an oscillator circuit |
5459432, | Jul 22 1993 | CUSTOM SENSORS & TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Use of a chopper and a sigma-delta modulator for downconverting and digitizing an analog signal including information modulated by a carrier |
5471396, | Aug 12 1993 | CUSTOM SENSORS & TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Estimator of amplitude and frequency of a noisy-biased sinusoid from short bursts of samples |
5473945, | Feb 14 1990 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical angular accelerometer with auxiliary linear accelerometer |
5476008, | Jul 25 1994 | Honeywell INC | Rate-sensing tuning fork design |
5487015, | Sep 13 1993 | BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Self-oscillating driver circuit for a quartz resonator of an angular rate sensor |
5496436, | Apr 07 1992 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Comb drive micromechanical tuning fork gyro fabrication method |
5505084, | Sep 11 1991 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical tuning fork angular rate sensor |
5507911, | Oct 17 1990 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Monolithic micromechanical vibrating string accelerometer with trimmable resonant frequency |
5515724, | Mar 16 1992 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical gyroscopic transducer with improved drive and sense capabilities |
5535902, | Nov 14 1994 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Gimballed vibrating wheel gyroscope |
5555765, | Feb 10 1993 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Gimballed vibrating wheel gyroscope |
5576976, | Sep 07 1993 | Honeywell INC | Amplitude detection and automatic gain control of a sparsely sampled sinusoid by adjustment of a notch filter |
5581035, | Aug 29 1994 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical sensor with a guard band electrode |
5585561, | Aug 11 1994 | New S.D., Inc. | Rotation rate sensor with closed ended tuning fork |
5605598, | Oct 17 1990 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc. | Monolithic micromechanical vibrating beam accelerometer with trimmable resonant frequency |
5635639, | Sep 11 1991 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical tuning fork angular rate sensor |
5635739, | Feb 14 1990 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical angular accelerometer with auxiliary linear accelerometer |
5646348, | Aug 29 1994 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical sensor with a guard band electrode and fabrication technique therefor |
5650568, | Feb 10 1993 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Gimballed vibrating wheel gyroscope having strain relief features |
5725729, | Sep 26 1994 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Process for micromechanical fabrication |
5760305, | Oct 17 1990 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Monolithic micromechanical vibrating beam accelerometer with trimmable resonant frequency |
5767405, | Apr 07 1992 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Comb-drive micromechanical tuning fork gyroscope with piezoelectric readout |
5783973, | Feb 24 1997 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Temperature insensitive silicon oscillator and precision voltage reference formed therefrom |
5817942, | Feb 28 1996 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Capacitive in-plane accelerometer |
5892153, | Nov 21 1996 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Guard bands which control out-of-plane sensitivities in tuning fork gyroscopes and other sensors |
5893054, | Sep 07 1993 | BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Amplitude detection and automatic gain control of a sparsely sampled sinusoid by computation including a hilbert transform |
5911156, | Feb 24 1997 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Split electrode to minimize charge transients, motor amplitude mismatch errors, and sensitivity to vertical translation in tuning fork gyros and other devices |
5952574, | Apr 29 1997 | CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC , THE | Trenches to reduce charging effects and to control out-of-plane sensitivities in tuning fork gyroscopes and other sensors |
5969250, | Oct 17 1990 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Micromechanical accelerometer having a peripherally suspended proof mass |
6089525, | Oct 07 1997 | ULTRATECH, INC | Six axis active vibration isolation and payload reaction force compensation system |
6134962, | Aug 12 1996 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Angular velocity detecting apparatus of a vibration type |
6230563, | Jun 09 1998 | ANALOG DEVICES IMI, INC | Dual-mass vibratory rate gyroscope with suppressed translational acceleration response and quadrature-error correction capability |
6532817, | May 06 1998 | MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD ; NIHON DENPA KOGYO CO , LTD | Angular velocity sensor and process for manufacturing the same |
6564636, | Aug 22 2001 | Honeywell International Inc. | Wide band digital phase locked loop (PLL) with a half-frequency output |
6691550, | Oct 16 2001 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Estimator for determining resonant frequency and Q |
6725169, | Mar 07 2002 | Honeywell International Inc | Methods and apparatus for automatic gain control |
6823733, | Nov 04 2002 | MICRO-OPTIMUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Z-axis vibration gyroscope |
7051590, | Jun 15 1999 | ANALOG DEVICES IMI, INC | Structure for attenuation or cancellation of quadrature error |
7138288, | Mar 28 2003 | CITIZEN HOLDINGS CO , LTD | Method for manufacturing small crystal resonator |
8187902, | Jul 09 2008 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc | High performance sensors and methods for forming the same |
RE34006, | Jan 11 1991 | Angular rate sensor |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2544646, | |||
3127775, | |||
3141100, | |||
4654663, | Nov 16 1981 | PIEZOELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY INVESTORS, LTD | Angular rate sensor system |
GB611011, | |||
GB861436, | |||
JP21679, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 22 1988 | Piezoelectric Technology Investors, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 16 1989 | M177: Surcharge for Late Payment, PL 97-247. |
Jun 16 1990 | M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247. |
Sep 26 1990 | LSM1: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat as Indiv Inventor. |
Sep 24 1992 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 10 1992 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Nov 25 1992 | R160: Refund Processed. Maintenance Fee Has Already Been Paid. |
Dec 24 1996 | M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 30 1992 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 30 1992 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 30 1993 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 30 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 30 1996 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 30 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 30 1997 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 30 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 30 2000 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 30 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 30 2001 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 30 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |