A vibratory angular rate sensor system preferably consists of a Z-cut quartz plate forming a mounting frame with a rectangular opening. Within the opening are mounted two pairs of tines. Each pair of tines is parallel to each other, one pair forming the drive tines and the other pair the output tines. Each corresponding set of two tines is disposed along the same axis having a common stem or base. The tines are secured by four bridges integral with the frame and connected to the stem. The arrangement is such that the pair of input tines vibrates in opposition to each other, while the pair of output tines vibrates with one tine going up while the other moves downwardly. As a result, the angular rate sensors drive frequency and the structural torque frequency are unequal. Therefore large displacements of the stem are unnecessary. An angular rate sensor having a support structure and first and second forks each lying in a plane each having an axis of symmetry with each fork having first and second spaced apart tines. The first and second forks are mechanically coupled to each other to provide a dual fork structure. A mount is provided for mounting the dual fork structure on the support structure. Energy is coupled into the first fork of the dual fork structure to cause vibratory motion of the tines of that fork in the plane of the fork. vibratory motion of the tines of the other fork in a direction normal to the plane of the other fork is sensed to provide a angular rate about the measure axis of symmetry of the first fork. The mounting serves to isolate the dual fork structure from the support structure.

Patent
   RE32931
Priority
May 02 1986
Filed
Jan 22 1988
Issued
May 30 1989
Expiry
May 30 2006
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
52
7
all paid
1. A vibratory angular rate sensor system comprising:
(a) a mounting, frame of substantially rectangular configuration having a substantially rectangular opening said frame mounting consisting of a piezoelectric material of Z-cut crystalline quartz;
(b) a first pair and a second pair of tines forming a tine structure, disposed in said opening said first pair forming vibrating drive tines, vibrating toward and away from each other in a plane of motion and said second pair of tines forming vibrating output tines, vibrating in directions perpendicular to said plane of motion opposite directions up and down;
(c) a stem interconnecting means interconnecting said first and second pair pairs of tines to effect an interdependency between the first and second pairs of tines whereby motion in one pair of tines is transferred to the other pair of tines, the tines of each pair being disposed parallel to each other and corresponding tines of both pairs each pair being disposed along a common axis;
(d) means including two pairs of input electrodes in contact with the first pair of tines for exciting said tines substantially at the resonant frequency thereof, said input electrodes being in the X-Y and Y-Z planes of said wafer;
(e) means including two pairs of output electrodes disposed in contact with the second pair of tines in the Y-Z plane for deriving an output signal representative of the angular rate experienced by said system, the flexural resonant frequency of said first pair of tines being lower than different from that of said second pair of tines and
(f) a plurality of bridges, bridge means integral with said frame mounting and connected to said stem means interconnecting said first and second pairs of tines for supporting said first and second pairs of tines on said mounting.
2. A system as defined in claim 1 wherein the flexural frequency stiffness of said bridges is substantially equal to the flexual frequency of said tines bridge means isolates vibration of the tine structure from the mounting.
3. A system as defined in claim 2 wherein the bridge means in combination with the tine structure has a resonant frequency which is substantially equal to the resonant frequency of the first pair of tines. 4. A system as defined in claim 1 wherein the interconnecting means is positioned relative to the first and second pairs of tines so that the interconnecting means has an extremely small displacement relative to the
first and second tines. 5. A system as defined in claim 4 wherein said bridge means is disposed intermediate the first and second pairs of tines. 6. A system as defined in claim 1 wherein the resonant frequency of said first pair of tines is lower than that of
the second pair of tines. 7. An angular rate sensor comprising a support structure, first and second forks each lying in a plane and each having an axis of symmetry, each fork having first and second spaced apart tines, means mechanically coupling the first and second forks to each other to provide a dual fork structure to effect an interdependency between the first and second forks whereby motion in one fork is transferred to the other fork, mounting means including isolation means for mounting the dual fork structure on the support structure, means for coupling energy into said first fork of the dual fork structure to cause vibratory motion of the tines of said first fork in the plane of said first fork to provide a drive fork, said isolation means serving to isolate said vibratory motion of the dual fork structure from vibratory motion of the support structure, and means for sensing vibratory motion of the tines of said second fork independent of relative motion between the support structure and the dual fork structure in a direction normal to the plane of said second fork to provide a sense fork separate from the drive fork to give a measure of the input angular rate applied to the dual fork structure about the major axis of symmetry of said first fork. 8. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein the resonant frequency of said vibratory motion of the tines of said drive fork is different from the resonant frequency of said vibratory motion of the tines of said sense
fork. 9. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein said dual
fork structure is formed of a piezoelectric material. 10. A rate sensor as in claim 9 wherein said mounting means is formed of a piezoelectric material. 11. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein said dual fork structure and said mounting means are formed of a single sheet of single crystal piezoelectric material. 12. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein said mounting means supports the dual fork structure in a region intermediate the first and second forks. 13. A rate sensor as in claim 12 wherein said mounting means in combination with the dual fork structure has a resonant frequency which is substantially the same frequency as said vibratory motion of the
tines of the first fork. 14. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein the first and second forks have a common axis of symmetry. 15. A rate sensor as in claim 14 wherein the first and second forks lie in a common plane. 16. A rate sensor as in claim 7 wherein at least a portion of the mounting means is constructed so that it has an extremely small displacement relative to the displacement of the first and second forks.

36 in FIG. 1. The rotation in the X-Y plane may be caused by the angular motion of the vehicle carrying the system. As a result, the stem 16 is twisted due to the Coriolis force which acts normal to the plane of vibration of tines 12 and 13. This, in turn, causes an up-and-down motion of the output thines 14, 15 in opposition directions.

It should be noted that the Y-Z flexural frequency is higher than the X-Y flexural frequency. Stated another way, a torque is felt by the stem 16. This, in turn, initiates or drives an Y-Z flexure in output tines 14, 15. This is so because the frequency is substantially similar to that of the tuning fork consisting of tines 12, 13. The X-Y flexure in tines 12 and 13 is piezoelectrically driven by the input electrodes 20 to 23 of FIG. 3. On the other hand, the Y-Z flexure caused by a rotation about the axis Y in tines 14, 15 is picked up piezoelectrically by the output electrodes 26 to 30 of FIG. 5.

The bridges 17, 18 have an X-Z flexural frequency which is substantially that of the flexural frequency of the tines 12, 13.

The electrodes and shielding connections for the input and output circuits are preferably made from the bridges 17, 18. It should be noted that the frequency and balance of the two pairs of tines 12, 13 and 14, 15 are adjusted by adding or removing material, such as a gold film, at the free ends of the tines on the appropriate sides. This may be effected by chemical etching or by a laser beam.

The rate sensors of the prior art depend on the flexural frequency of the drive tines being substantially the same as the torsional frequency of the entire system. According to the present invention, the drive frequency of the angular rate sensor and the structural torisonal frequency are not the same. Therefore, large displacements of the stem 16 are not necessary. The displacement of the stem 16 is extremely small relative to that of the pickup or output tines 14, 15. This is due to the Q multiplication of the displacement of the tines with respect to the entire structure. It will now be understood that the vibration of the angular rate sensor is easily isolated from the mounting frame 10 and hence from the environment.

Staudte, Juergen H.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
5193391, Nov 14 1990 Controlled vibration angular rate sensor
5331852, Sep 11 1991 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Electromagnetic rebalanced micromechanical transducer
5349855, Apr 07 1992 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.; CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC , THE, A MA CORP Comb drive micromechanical tuning fork gyro
5357817, Apr 19 1990 Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Wide bandwidth stable member without angular accelerometers
5361036, Aug 12 1993 BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC Complex digital demodulator employing Chebychev-approximation derived synthetic sinusoid generation
5388458, Nov 24 1992 CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC , THE Quartz resonant gyroscope or quartz resonant tuning fork gyroscope
5396144, Aug 02 1993 BEI SENSORS & SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC , A CORP OF DELAWARE Rotation rate sensor with center mounted tuning fork
5408119, Oct 17 1990 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Monolithic micromechanical vibrating string accelerometer with trimmable resonant frequency
5408877, Mar 16 1992 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical gyroscopic transducer with improved drive and sense capabilities
5426970, Aug 02 1993 BEI SENSORS & SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC , A CORP OF DELAWARE Rotation rate sensor with built in test circuit
5444641, Sep 24 1993 BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC Admittance-parameter estimator for a piezoelectric resonator in an oscillator circuit
5459432, Jul 22 1993 CUSTOM SENSORS & TECHNOLOGIES, INC Use of a chopper and a sigma-delta modulator for downconverting and digitizing an analog signal including information modulated by a carrier
5471396, Aug 12 1993 CUSTOM SENSORS & TECHNOLOGIES, INC Estimator of amplitude and frequency of a noisy-biased sinusoid from short bursts of samples
5473945, Feb 14 1990 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical angular accelerometer with auxiliary linear accelerometer
5476008, Jul 25 1994 Honeywell INC Rate-sensing tuning fork design
5487015, Sep 13 1993 BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC Self-oscillating driver circuit for a quartz resonator of an angular rate sensor
5496436, Apr 07 1992 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Comb drive micromechanical tuning fork gyro fabrication method
5505084, Sep 11 1991 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical tuning fork angular rate sensor
5507911, Oct 17 1990 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Monolithic micromechanical vibrating string accelerometer with trimmable resonant frequency
5515724, Mar 16 1992 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical gyroscopic transducer with improved drive and sense capabilities
5535902, Nov 14 1994 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Gimballed vibrating wheel gyroscope
5555765, Feb 10 1993 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Gimballed vibrating wheel gyroscope
5576976, Sep 07 1993 Honeywell INC Amplitude detection and automatic gain control of a sparsely sampled sinusoid by adjustment of a notch filter
5581035, Aug 29 1994 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical sensor with a guard band electrode
5585561, Aug 11 1994 New S.D., Inc. Rotation rate sensor with closed ended tuning fork
5605598, Oct 17 1990 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc. Monolithic micromechanical vibrating beam accelerometer with trimmable resonant frequency
5635639, Sep 11 1991 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical tuning fork angular rate sensor
5635739, Feb 14 1990 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical angular accelerometer with auxiliary linear accelerometer
5646348, Aug 29 1994 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical sensor with a guard band electrode and fabrication technique therefor
5650568, Feb 10 1993 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Gimballed vibrating wheel gyroscope having strain relief features
5725729, Sep 26 1994 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Process for micromechanical fabrication
5760305, Oct 17 1990 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Monolithic micromechanical vibrating beam accelerometer with trimmable resonant frequency
5767405, Apr 07 1992 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Comb-drive micromechanical tuning fork gyroscope with piezoelectric readout
5783973, Feb 24 1997 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Temperature insensitive silicon oscillator and precision voltage reference formed therefrom
5817942, Feb 28 1996 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Capacitive in-plane accelerometer
5892153, Nov 21 1996 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Guard bands which control out-of-plane sensitivities in tuning fork gyroscopes and other sensors
5893054, Sep 07 1993 BEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC Amplitude detection and automatic gain control of a sparsely sampled sinusoid by computation including a hilbert transform
5911156, Feb 24 1997 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Split electrode to minimize charge transients, motor amplitude mismatch errors, and sensitivity to vertical translation in tuning fork gyros and other devices
5952574, Apr 29 1997 CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC , THE Trenches to reduce charging effects and to control out-of-plane sensitivities in tuning fork gyroscopes and other sensors
5969250, Oct 17 1990 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Micromechanical accelerometer having a peripherally suspended proof mass
6089525, Oct 07 1997 ULTRATECH, INC Six axis active vibration isolation and payload reaction force compensation system
6134962, Aug 12 1996 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Angular velocity detecting apparatus of a vibration type
6230563, Jun 09 1998 ANALOG DEVICES IMI, INC Dual-mass vibratory rate gyroscope with suppressed translational acceleration response and quadrature-error correction capability
6532817, May 06 1998 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD ; NIHON DENPA KOGYO CO , LTD Angular velocity sensor and process for manufacturing the same
6564636, Aug 22 2001 Honeywell International Inc. Wide band digital phase locked loop (PLL) with a half-frequency output
6691550, Oct 16 2001 Honeywell International, Inc. Estimator for determining resonant frequency and Q
6725169, Mar 07 2002 Honeywell International Inc Methods and apparatus for automatic gain control
6823733, Nov 04 2002 MICRO-OPTIMUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC Z-axis vibration gyroscope
7051590, Jun 15 1999 ANALOG DEVICES IMI, INC Structure for attenuation or cancellation of quadrature error
7138288, Mar 28 2003 CITIZEN HOLDINGS CO , LTD Method for manufacturing small crystal resonator
8187902, Jul 09 2008 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc High performance sensors and methods for forming the same
RE34006, Jan 11 1991 Angular rate sensor
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2544646,
3127775,
3141100,
4654663, Nov 16 1981 PIEZOELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY INVESTORS, LTD Angular rate sensor system
GB611011,
GB861436,
JP21679,
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jan 22 1988Piezoelectric Technology Investors, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 16 1989M177: Surcharge for Late Payment, PL 97-247.
Jun 16 1990M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247.
Sep 26 1990LSM1: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat as Indiv Inventor.
Sep 24 1992M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Nov 10 1992ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Nov 25 1992R160: Refund Processed. Maintenance Fee Has Already Been Paid.
Dec 24 1996M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
May 30 19924 years fee payment window open
Nov 30 19926 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 30 1993patent expiry (for year 4)
May 30 19952 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
May 30 19968 years fee payment window open
Nov 30 19966 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 30 1997patent expiry (for year 8)
May 30 19992 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
May 30 200012 years fee payment window open
Nov 30 20006 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 30 2001patent expiry (for year 12)
May 30 20032 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)