A boat hull having a two-stage flow chamber. The first stage flow chamber starts about amidships as a v-shape fairing upward at a shallow angle and flattening out about halfway to the stern. The second stage flow chamber starts at the end of the forward flow chamber curving upward at a greater angle than the first stage and curving downward slightly at the stern. The second state flow chamber has an inverted v-shape portion connected to the bottom by a pair of narrow sidewalls spreading slightly outward. The forward flwo chamber delivers water to the aft flow chamber free from turbulence. The propeller is disposed in the aft flow chamber and splayed slighly to port. water exits from the aft flow chamber with minimum turbulence and cavitation.

Patent
   RE33165
Priority
Aug 30 1988
Filed
Aug 30 1988
Issued
Feb 13 1990
Expiry
Aug 30 2008
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
13
5
all paid
7. A boat hull having at least one two-stage flow chamber comprising:
a v-bottom hull having a forward flow chamber stage defined by a first surface beginning with a flow entry portion parallel to adjacent surfaces of the boat hull and gradually increasing in depth as said forward stage extends toward an aft end of the boat hull, said first surface angularly varying from a plane parallel to said surface of the hull to a plane lying substantially parallel to a surface of water when the boat hull is at rest in the water; and
an aft flow chamber stage aligned with an aft end of said forward flow chamber stage and defined by a second surface beginning at said aft end of said forward flow chamber stage and curving upward into an inverted v-shape and having a pair of opposed planar sides connecting said second surface to said boat hull.
1. A boat hull having a v bottom and a keel line comprising:
a forward flow chamber defined by a first surface beginning approximately amidships of said hull and extending above the keel line thereof starting as a v-shape lying essentially transverse to the keel line, said first surface connected to said bottom by a pair of planar sides fairing slightly outboard from a vertical plane, said forward flow chamber gradually increasing in cross-sectional area as extended aft and the angle of said v-shape increasing such that the angle of said surface at the aft end of said forward flow chamber is approximately 180°;
a keelson keel disposed and aligned longitudinally with said keel line in said forward flow chamber; and
an aft flow chamber defined by a second surface beginning at said aft end of said forward flow chamber and curving upward as an inverted v-shape, said second surface connected to said bottom by aft extensions of said pair of planar sides, said second surface curving downward slightly at the stern of said hull;
whereby said forward flow chamber delivers water to said aft flow chamber smoothly with minimum turbulence and water issues from said aft flow chamber with minimum cavitation and turbulence.
2. The hull as defined in claim 1 in which the rate at which said second surface curves upward is greater than the rate of upward extension of said first surface.
3. The hull as defined in claim 2 in which said upward extension of said first surface forms a curve.
4. The hull as defined in claim 1 which further comprises a propeller shaft and a propeller disposed in said aft flow chamber, said propeller shaft splayed with respect to said keel line.
5. The hull as defined in claim 4 in which said aft flow chamber comprises a tunnel, said propeller being disposed completely within said tunnel.
6. The hull as defined in claim 1 which further comprises a skeg extending from the aft end of said keelson keel aft to said stern.
8. The boat hull of claim 7 and including a second flow chamber having corresponding forward and aft flow chamber stages substantially identical to said forward flow chamber stage and said aft flow chamber stage, respectively, of said at least one flow chamber, said second flow chamber being positioned parallel to said at least one flow chamber on an opposite side of a keel line of the boat hull, an additional propeller and drive shaft being disposed within only said aft flow chamber stage of said second flow chamber.
9. The boat hull chamber of claim 7 and including a second flow chamber substantially identical to said at least one flow chamber, said second flow chamber being positioned parallel to said at least one flow chamber. 10. The boat hull of claim 7 and including a keel disposed only within and aligned longitudinally with a longitudinal mid-line of said forward flow chamber stage.

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to boat hulls, and more particularly to a boat hull having a two-stage flow chamber in which the driving propeller is disposed.

2. Description of the Prior Art

It is well known in the prior art to provide a tunnel or propeller pocket in the hull of a boat to provide additional clearance between the bottom of the hull and the bottom of the waterway. In addition, it has been suggested that such tunnels tend to improve the efficiency of the propulsion system. Early patents, such as U.S. Pat. No. 128,407, have disclosed tunnels running the entire length of the hull which effectively forms a double hull. The use of pockets or cavities at the stern of the boat in which the propeller is mounted had been taught by the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 111,462; 3,515,087; 3,611,973; 4,371,350; and 4,383,828.

Generally, these patents teach a cavity or pocket which may extend for about one-third the length of the hull at the stern. A typical design is taught by the '087 and '973 patents both issued to Stuart. Stuart shows a U-shaped tunnel running aft to the amidship line of the hull toward the stern. The tunnel smoothly increases in size and diameter as it runs aft and is opened fully at the stern. Stuart claims an advantage in that the slipstream of water in the tunnel and aft of the propeller results in a jet-like stream of water producing a reaction drive similar to a jet engine.

I have found, however, that the Stuart design having a U-shaped cavity has a serious problem in that the water received by the propeller has been foiled off of the hull causing turbulence and cavitation. The result is poor performance of the propeller. Thus, there is a need for a hull tunnel design to provide the advantages of the low draft, yet which will not sacrifice efficiency due to turbulence and cavitation in the tunnel. I refer to such a design as a "flow chamber" since water will flow with a minimum of turbulence.

My improved flow chamber for a boat hull overcomes the problems in the prior art and provides efficient propulsion with a low draft. A two stage flow chamber is provided starting approximately at the midpoint of the keel. The flow chamber starts at a point for which the hull is still in the water when the boat is planing. The first section of the flow chamber has an initial V-shape with the same angle as the hull and increases in cross-sectional area, at a shallow angle flattening out toward the stern of the boat. The second section of the flow chamber begins at the aft end of the first section, curving upward at a larger angle and curving downward slightly at the stern. A keelson keel 15 runs approximately the length of forward flow chamber 14. At the termination of forward flow chamber 14, the aft flow chamber 16 begins which curves upward at a sharper angle than the forward flow chamber 14 and curves downward slightly at the point of connection with transom 12 as indicated by the section of surface 17. The aft flow chamber 16 comprises two upper surfaces 17 forming a shallow inverted V and two side surfaces 18, joining surfaces 17 at an obtuse angle as indicated in FIG. 3 and connecting with the hull bottom 20. The shape of keelson keel 15 is also apparent from the view in FIG. 3.

The cross-sectional shape of forward flow chamber 14 is important to ensure a laminar flow of water into aft flow chamber 16. Referring to FIGS. 7-9, this shape is illustrated. Flow chamber 14 starts as a V parallel with the hull bottom (see FIG. 7) and gradually decreases in angle toward the aft flow chamber 16. As noted from FIG. 8, the angle of the V along plane 8--8 of FIG. 2 is approaching 180°. At the end of forward flow chamber and at the beginning of aft flow chamber 16, the angle is 180°, as seen in FIG. 9.

Advantageously, water is delivered to aft flow chamber 12 smoothly, without turbulence or cavitation.

Turning now to FIGS. 4 and 5, the installation of the rudder and propeller is shown. As will be noted from FIG. 4, propeller shaft 22 enters the hull near the forward end of aft flow chamber 17 and is connected to a power plant not shown. A rudder 30 is illustrated mounted just aft of propeller 26. A flat metal skeg may be connected from the aft end of keelson keel 15 to propeller strut 24 and rudder post 32. The skeg 28 serves to protect these elements and to provide additional rigidity. As best seen in the bottom view of hull 10 of FIG. 6, power plant 23 and propeller shaft 22 are splayed to port by an angle.

Having shown the construction of my improved hull and flow chamber of the invention, the operation thereof will not be described. When the boat is underway, the V-shaped bottom 20 tends to cause the boat to plane. The hull design 10 is such that the forward point where forward flow chamber 16 is faired into the keel area 20 remains in the water. The flow of water over the surfaces of forward flow chamber 14 is relatively flat and is thus delivered to aft flow chamber 17 without turbulence. The forward motion of the boat and the action of propeller 26 will be to guide the water into the flow chamber 16 as a clean, laminar flow and, therefore, the propeller finds a solid stream of water against which to work. Cavitation is thus prevented and very little, if any, slippage will normally occur. Therefore, the maximum effectiveness of the propeller 26 is achieved. The slight downward curve of surface 17 (see FIG. 2) at the stern prevents the usual "rooster tail" that forms from a tunnel hull at high speeds, reducing the drag which would otherwise result.

An alternative embodiment of may invention is shown in the stern view of a hull 35 in FIG. 7. As may be noted, the alternative design is for use with twin propeller drives. A pair of flow chambers 40 is disposed with one on either side of the keel. Flow chambers 40 are otherwise identical to flow chambers 14 and 16 previously described.

It is to be understood that the illustrations shown above are for exemplary purposes only and various changes may be made to my design by those of skill and art without departing from the spirit and scope of my invention.

Whitehead, Robert M.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
5910032, Oct 14 1997 Brunswick Corporation Marine propulsion system
6125781, Jul 31 1998 RALPH WHITE S MARINE, INC Tunnel-hulled boat
6293218, Aug 21 2000 RALPH WHITE S MARINE, INC Tunnel-hulled boat
6406341, Nov 20 2000 HELL S BAY HOLDING, INC Shallow draft boat
6846210, Apr 02 2003 Nozzle drive propulsion for a marine craft
7104855, Apr 02 2003 Nozzle drive propulsion for a marine craft
7299763, Dec 22 2004 Navatek, Ltd Hull with propulsion tunnel and leading edge interceptor
7371139, Apr 02 2003 Nozzle drive propulsion for a marine craft
7753747, Jan 10 2008 Twin Troller Boats, Inc. Electric powered boat
7845301, Dec 06 2005 HULL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH LLC Ventilated aft swept flow interrupter hull
7845302, Dec 06 2005 HULL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH LLC Ventilated flow interrupter stepped hull
8800463, Jul 15 2010 Boat hull construction
9446827, Jul 15 2010 Boat hull construction
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2985133,
3937173, Oct 23 1973 Penn Yan Boats, Incorporated Deep-V tunnel stern boat
4300889, Apr 01 1980 Shallow draft propeller pocket
815187,
GB211927,
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Mar 02 1998M285: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Feb 13 19934 years fee payment window open
Aug 13 19936 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 13 1994patent expiry (for year 4)
Feb 13 19962 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Feb 13 19978 years fee payment window open
Aug 13 19976 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 13 1998patent expiry (for year 8)
Feb 13 20002 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Feb 13 200112 years fee payment window open
Aug 13 20016 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 13 2002patent expiry (for year 12)
Feb 13 20042 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)