There is disclosed a novel method and product for the treatment and prevention of rheumatoid arthritis. The method involves passive immunization against a mixed spectrum of infectious bacteria which reside in the human gastrointestinal tract. The passive immunization is accomplished by oralinjestion ingestion of IgG immunoglobulin obtained from the milk of cows that have been immunized against a specific spectrum of bacterial types. A unique combination of bacterial species is formulated into a vaccine which is used to immunize dairy cattle. The IgG antibody obtained from the milk of the immunized cows constitutes the product of the invention.

Patent
   RE33565
Priority
Feb 06 1978
Filed
Aug 11 1988
Issued
Apr 02 1991
Expiry
Apr 02 2008
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
6
39
all paid
1. A method for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis caused by a mixed spectrum of infectious bacteria which reside in the gastrointestinal tract, including:
______________________________________
ORGANISMS
______________________________________
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 1
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 3
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 5
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 8
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 12
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 14
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 18
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 22
Aerobacter aerogenes
Escherichia coli
Salmonella enteritidis
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Salmonella typhimurium
Haemophilus influenzae
Streptococcus viridans
Proteus vulgaris
Shigella dysenteriae
Streptococcus, Group B
Diplococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus mutans
Corynebacterium, Acne, Types 1 & 2
______________________________________
which comprises the oral administration of a quantity of non-fat milk solids equivalent to one quart of immunized cow's milk Ig G, post-prandially two times daily, wherein the cow's milk IgG includes antibodies produced by the following microorganisms from American Type culture collection bacterial antigens:
______________________________________
ORGANISM *ATCC NO.
______________________________________
Staphylococcus aureus 11631
Staphylococcus epidermidis
155
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 1
8671
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 3
10389
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 5
12347
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 8
12349
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 12
11434
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 14
12972
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 18
12357
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 22
10403
Aerobacter aerogenes 884
Escherichia coli 26
Salmonella enteritidis
13076
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
7700
Klebsiella pneumoniae 9590
Salmonella typhimurium
13311
Haemophilus influenzae
9333
Streptococcus viridans
6249
Proteus vulgaris 13315
Shigella dysenteriae 11835
Streptococcus, Group B
Diplococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus mutans
Corynebacterium, Acne, Types 1 & 2
______________________________________
2. An antibody for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis caused by a mixed spectrum of infectious bacteria which reside in the gastrointestinal tract, including:
______________________________________
ORGANISMS
______________________________________
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 1
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 3
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 5
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 8
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 12
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 14
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 18
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 22
Aerobacter aerogenes
Escherichia coli
Salmonella enteritidis
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Salmonella typhimurium
Haemophilus influenzae
Streptococcus viridans
Proteus vulgaris
Shigella dysenteriae
Streptococcus, Group B
Diplococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus mutans
Corynebacterium, Acne, Types 1 & 2
______________________________________
produced by first preparing a vaccine from killed bacteria from the American Type culture collection bacterial antigens, including:
______________________________________
Staphylococcus aureus 11631
Staphylococcus epidermidis
155
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 1
8671
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 3
10389
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 5
12347
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 8
12349
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 12
11434
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 14
12972
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 18
12357
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 22
10403
Aerobacter aerogenes 884
Escherichia coli 26
Salmonella enteritidis
13076
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
7700
Klebsiella pneumoniae 9590
Salmonella typhimurium
13311
Haemophilus influenzae
9333
Streptococcus viridans
6249
Proteus vulgaris 13315
Shigella dysenteriae 11835
Streptococcus, Group B
Diplococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus mutans
Corynebacterium, Acne, Types 1 & 2
______________________________________
injecting said vaccine intramuscularly in healthy cows once weekly for four consecutive weeks, and twice monthly thereafter, each injection involving 20×108 bacterial cells; collecting the milk from the immunized cows beginning the fourth week; and testing fro for titer to insure that the minimum titer against each of the bacteria is 1-500, as determined by the tube agglutination method for testing antibody titer.
3. The preparation of claim 2, wherein the antibody product type IgG is pure immunoglobulin obtained from milk.
4. The method of preparing the antibody of claim 2 which includes preparing a vaccine from killed bacteria from the American Type culture collection bacterial antigens including:
______________________________________
Staphylococcus aureus 11631
Staphylococcus epidermidis
155
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 1
8671
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 3
10389
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 5
12347
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 8
12349
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 12
11434
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 14
12972
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 18
12357
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 22
10403
Aerobacter aerogenes 884
Escherichia coli 26
Salmonella enteritidis
13076
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
7700
Klebsiella pneumoniae 9590
Salmonella typhimurium
13311
Haemophilus influenzae
9333
Streptococcus viridans
6249
Proteus vulgaris 13315
Shigella dysenteriae 11835
Streptococcus, Group B
Diplococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus mutans
Corynebacterium, Acne, Types 1 & 2
______________________________________
injecting said vaccine intramuscularly in healthy cows and weekly for four consecutive weeks, and twice monthly thereafter, each injections injection involving 20×108 bacterial cells, ; collecting the milk from the immunized cows beginning the fourth week; and testing for titer to insure that the minimum titer of antibody against each of the bacteria is 1-500, as determined by the tube agglutination method for testing antibody titer.

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 875,140, filed Feb. 6, 1978, now abandoned.

This application is related to an application in the name of Lee Randolph Beck, Ser. No. 776,249 filed Mar. 10, 1977.

A number of years ago it was commonly believed that rheumatoid arthritis had an infectious etiology. This view is not popular today, although the inflammatory features and constitutional manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis-the synovitis and granulomatous lesions, the fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis, lymphadenopathy and ocassional spelnomegaly, the accelerated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and other changes in "acute phases reactants" are all compatible with an infectious process. Competent and repeated bacteriologic studies have failed to recover consistently a single infectious agent from the blood, synovial fluid, synovial tissues or subcutaneous nodules. Attempts to transmit the disease by injecting joint fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis into the joints of other human subjects have been unsuccessful. Subcutaneous nodules have failed to survive following homologous transplantation (Bauer, et al, 1951) the Practitioner 166:5.

An infectious process may appear to precipitate the onset of rheumatoid arthritis in a significant number of patients, and may exert a deleterious influence on the course of the disease when it has already been established. There is statistical evidence to support this clinical impression (Lewis-Faning, 1950) Ann Rheum. Dis., Suppl. 9.

Many attempts have been madeto produce a disease in animals similar to rheumatoid arthritis. While a variety of bacteria can produce arthritis in animals, they fail to reproduce the clinical and pathologic features of rheumatoid arthritis, particularly the self-perpetuating characters of the proliferative arthritis. Arthritis bearing some semblance to the human disease has been produced in mice by pleuro-pneumonia-like organisms (Sabin, 1939) Science 89:228, and in swine by Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (Sikes, et al, 1955). The concept that these organisms may initiate a hypersensitivity mechanism has been postulated (Sikes, et al, 1955).

Students of rheumatoid arthritis nevertheless continue to be intrigued by certain recurring themes that suggest relationships between infections and joint disease. Gonorrhea, for instance, is capable not only of producing typical gonorrheal arthritis but also of occasionally introducing chronic arthritis which questionnarirepowered powdered milk which optimally contains a population of natural IgG type antibodies that react with the bacterial species listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1
______________________________________
Bacterial Antigens
ORGANISM *ATCC NO.
______________________________________
Staphylococcus aureus 11631
Staphylococcus epidermidis
155
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 1
8671
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 3
10389
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 5
12347
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 8
12349
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 12
11434
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 14
12972
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 18
12357
Streptococcus pyogenes, A. Type 22
10403
Aerobacter aerogenes 884
Escherichia coli 26
Salmonella enteritidis
13076
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
7700
Klebsiella pneumoniae 9590
Salmonella typhimurium
13311
Haemophilus influenzae
9333
Streptococcus viridans
6249
Proteus vulgaris 13315
Shigella dysenteriae 11835
Streptococcus, Group B
Diplococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus mutans
Corynebacterium, Acne, Types 1 & 2
______________________________________
*American Type Culture Collection, 12301 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, Md.
20852

The antibacterial milk contains all of the substances normally found in low-fat powdered milk. The principal constituents comprising antibacterial milk are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2
______________________________________
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Antibacterial Milk
Proteins 35.6%
Fat 1.0%
Carbohydrates 52%
Minerals 7.8%
Moisture 3.5%
Each reliquified quart of 3-4 ounces of
non-fat dry milk contains approximately:
1200 mg calcium 157%
935 mg phosphorous 125%
0.3 mg thiamine 32%
1.78 mg riboflavin 140%
1.04 mg niacin 10%
324 Calories
______________________________________

Antibacterial milk and normal cow's milk contain the same approximate percent by weight concentration of ingredients. Moreover, the concentration of type IgG immunoglobulin in antibacterial milk and normal milk is identical. Therefore, it is only the specificity of antibodies comprising the antibacterial milk which distinguishes it from normal milk. By specificity of the immunoglobulin is meant the spectrum of bacterial species that with which the antibodies react with.

Antibacterial milk contains no drug additives or any other components which are not natural food products of the cow.

The immune milk of the present invention is also useful in the control of auto-immune diseases, e.g. lupus erythematosus and the like, which are caused or aggravated by bacterial infectious in the gastrointestinal tract.

The polyvalent antigen used for the induction of antibacterial milk is prepared as follows:

The bacterial strains listed in Table 1 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, which ensures authenticity of bacterial strains and the highest standard of purity that is available. Upon receipt, each individual bacterial strain was grown on a blood agar plate to test the viability of the culture and to determine if growth pattern is typical or atypical of the bacteria in question. A single colony from each of the test cultures was taken for histological examination to further ensure authenticity and purity of the culture. A single colony of each culture was used to inoculate 500 ml of standard culture broth. The standard broths recommended by the American Type Culture Collection were used to grow each of the specific bacteria listed in Table 1.

All organisms were incubated as static cultures with the exception of 12, 13, 14 and 16, which were incubated in the shaker to provide agitation. Identification of bacterial strains and the American Type Culture Collection catalog numbers are shown in Table 1. Each culture was cultivated for 48 hours at 37°C Following incubation, the cultures were killed by heating at 60°C for two hours. Samples of the killed bacteria were used to inoculate fresh broth which was then incubated for 24 hours at 37°C to determine if the filling killing process was complete. Only cultures proven sterile by this procedure were used for further processing. Sterile cultures were then washed five times in distilled water and the cells were recovered by centrifugation. The bacterial cells were frozen by immersion in liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried by the process of lyophilization. The lyophilized cells were stored in sterile vials until used for production of the polyvalent vaccine. The polyvalent vaccine was prepared by weighting out one gram quantities of each of the bacterial strains. The dry cells were mixed together and this mixture was suspended in sterile physiological saline (20 grams of bacteria per 500 ml saline).

A sample of the concentrated solution was diluted in serial fashion with saline to determine the dilution which gives a concentration of 4×108 ml CL per cc. The stock 55 concentrated polvalent vaccine was diskpersed dispersed into multiple containers and stored frozen. A sufficient amount of concentrated antigen was included in each individual container to immunize 50 cows. The final dilution of concentrate was made just prior to immunization The preferred procedure is to remove a sufficient number of vials to immunize the number of cows to be treated. For example, the vials are removed 24 hours prior to the planned time of immunization; a sample of the concentrate is then diluted in a sterile container to a final concentration of 4×108 cells per ml. The maximum response in cows is obtained by injecting 20×108 bacterial cells or 5 cc of the sterile preparation which is 4×108 cells per ml according to the method of immunization described below.

The antibody product of the invention is produced by immunizing cows with the polyvalent antigen prepared as described above. The cows are injected with 5 cc of polyvalent antigen containing 20×108 bacterial cells. The injection is made intramuscularly in the gluteus maximus muscle of the hind leg. This procedure is repeated at one week intervals for four consecutive weeks beginning 2-3 weeks prior to the predicted day of parturition. Following the primary immunization, booster injections using the same concentration of the antigen, are given every 14 days. This method of immunization gives the maximum antibody titer.

The milk is collected from immunized cows in a modern dairy parlor. A fully automated milking system collects and stores the milk under complete sanitary conditions. The milking system consists of automated machines connected directly to refrigerated storage tanks by a closed system of pipes. The complete system is cleaned and sterilized following each milking to ensure maximum sanitary conditions. It is important to take careful steps to prevent the growth of bacteria to in immune milk during processing, since such bacteria can lower the titer of antibodies in the milk.

Milk is transported daily from the refrigerated holding tanks to a dairy processing plant by milk transport trucks. At the dairy plant a high temperature short-time system is used to pasteurize the antibacterial milk. Specialized dairy machinery provides the flash heating of a continuous flow of milk to 155° F. for a period of not more than 15 seconds. Temperature and time is critical since antibody is susceptible to degradation by heat. Milk antibody is destroyed at temperatures above 165° F., if held for periods longer than one minute. Following pasteurization, the whole milk is immediately cooled and the fat is removed by centrifugation, and the skimmed whole antibacterial milk is powdered by a spray process. The spray process consists of a large drying chamber into which hot air (350° F.) is blown at high velocity. The skimmed milk is atomized into the chamber where the finely divided milk particles are instantly dried as they fall to the bottom of the tank. The dried milk is removed automatically by means of mechanical devices and the milk powder is packaged under sanitary conditions. Prior to atomizing, the skimmed milk is condensed by boiling in a chamber under vacuum (100°-110° F.). At each step it is critical to keep the bacteria from contaminating the milk since this reduces the titer of the antibody.

Immune milk was prepared in inbred Holstein cows. The cows were immunized by the intramuscular injection of a mixture of bacterial antigens identified in Table 1. The vaccine was prepared by the process described above. The immunologic response of the cows was boosted by bi-weekly injections of the vaccine. The milk from these cows was pooled, the fat removed, and the non-fat milk was pasteurized by exposure to 162° F. for 16 seconds followed by a spray-drying process in which the temperature of the milk did not exceed 85° F. The milk was packaged in one quart polyethylene containers. Control milk (placebo) was non-fat powedered powdered milk purchased from a local producer.

Erythrocyte sedimentation rates were determined on freshly collected blood by the method of Westergren and corrected for hematocrit according to the method of Wintrobe & Landsberg (1935). Rheumatoid factor titers were determined by the Singer-Plotz (1966) macroscopic tube test.

Patients were accepted for the study on the basis of an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and a positive rheumatoid factor titer. Nine patients were studied for 12 months and 11 patients were studied 18 months. The patient group was composed of thirteen caucasian females ranging in age from 32 to 69 years with an average of 50.4 years, and seven caucasian males ranging in age from 43 to 70 years with an average age of 58.1 years. The mean duration of arthritis was 10.8 years for the females and 11.0 for the males. Patients were randomly placed either on immune milk or on non-immune milk (a commercial product purchased in the Dayton area that served as a placebo). Both milk products were packaged in identical containers and were identified as being immune milk or placebo, respectively, by a blue or red pressure-sensitive label that was attached to each container at the time it was filled. The labels were removed just prior to dispensing the milk to the patients. Thus, at no time did the patients know whether they were receiving immune milk or placebo. Patients were randomly (as determined by the flip of a coin) selected to receive either immune milk or the placebo during the first six-month period. At the end of this time, those that were receiving immune milk were placed on the placebo and those that were receiving placebo were placed on immune milk for the second six-month period.

At the end of the second six-month period, 11 patients volunteered to remain on the study for an additional six months. The type of milk (immune or placebo) was again changed at this time and observations were continued. Thus, the study was comprised of three six-month periods, 11 of the patients participating for three periods and nine participating for two periods. Patients were seen at monthly intervals at which time a one month supply of milk was dispensed, an evaluation questionnaire were filled out and a blood sample was collected for rheumatoid factor titer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and hematocrit determination.

Patients were instructed to take a quantity of non-fat milk solids equivalent to one quart of milk post prandially two times daily. The milk solids were freshly dissolved in one pint of cool tap water immediately before ingestion shortly after awakening in the morning and again just prior to retiring at night. They were told to see their physician as usual and to follow the treatment regimens prescribed by him. Medication was to be taken ad libitum or as prescribed by their regular doctor. We requested only that they report the quantity of medicines taken.

A questionnaire was completed by each patient at monthly intervals. It was divided into six sections that deal with:

(1) duration of morning stiffness,

(2) severity of pain experienced in each of eight joints,

(3) type and quantity of drugs with short-term actions that were taken,

(4) type and quantity of drugs with long-lasting actions that were taken,

(5) ability of patient to conduct his normal activities, and

(6) severity of symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. The numbers shown in the spaces next to each answer indicate the score assigned to that answer in the course of evaluating the questionnaires. In scoring the sections dealing with medications, an effort was made to reflect the relative anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of the various drugs used. A five-grain aspirin tablet as was assigned a value of one. All other drugs (with the except exception of gold, plaquenil and cortisone shots which were considered separately) were arbitrarily assigned values relative to aspirin. Thus, all salicylate preparations, Tylenol, Darvon, Motrin, etc. were considered equivalent to a five-grain aspirin tablet and were also assigned a value of one. The number of mg of Prednisone was multiplied times four, the number of Indocin capsules taken was multiplied times 2.5. The number of grains of codeine was multiplied times two, and the number of Butazoladin tablets taken was multiplied times seven.

The mean scores in each category were calculated for each six-month period. The differences of the means where then calculated by subtracting the mean values scored during administration of immune milk from those scored during administration of placebo. When the results were calculated in this manner, improvement in the patient's condition during the period he received immune milk was indicated by negative values for questions one and six, and by positive values for all other questions. Mean corrected erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) and rheumatoid factor titers (RF) were respectively shown in a similar manner. There were calculated in such a way that positive values reflect a lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate or rehumatoid rheumatoid factor titer during administration of immune milk. The data were statistically evaluated using the Statistical Analysis System of Goodnight et al. (Computer Program Used for the Statistical Analyses, Statistical Systems Institute, Raleigh, N.C.). Calculations were performed with the aid of an IBM model 370/155 computer.

The immune milk was well tolerated by all patients with the exception of one who had pernicious anemia. This patient complained of diarrhea and was terminated from the study. Some patients reported a weight gain during the course of the study. This may have been due to the increased caloric intake from the milk or possibly reflects a generalized improvement in their physical condition.

TABLE 3
__________________________________________________________________________
Periods of
Treatment Regimen
Observation
Placebo Immune Mean
Control
Immune
Mean
C.V.*
Mean
C.V.*
Difference
P
__________________________________________________________________________
A.M. Stiffness
27 24 0.322
95.7
0.679
35.6
-0.347
0.0001
Joint Pain
a. Shoulder
27 24 0.954
67.1
0.716
60.2
+0.238
0.0420
b. Elbow
27 24 0.752
83.7
0.613
65.9
+0.139
0.0511
c. Wrist
27 24 0.824
73.6
0.539
74.8
+0.285
0.0010
d. Hand 27 24 1.073
54.7
0.828
56.5
+0.245
0.0011
e. Hip 27 24 0.533
90.3
0.227
135.0
+0.306
0.0005
f. Knee 27 24 0.904
74.1
0.683
59.0
+0.221
0.0015
g. Ankle
26 22 0.7811
66.9
0.659
65.7
+0.1221
0.0127
h. Feet 26 22 0.948
63.7
0.729
50.9
+0.219
0.0010
Pills 27 24 20.663
104.1
16.515
101.3
+4.148
0.0405
Other 27 24 0.325
140.7
0.244
175.6
+0.081
0.0276
Medication
ADL 27 24 2.224
36.1
1.874
29.1
+0.350
0.0023
Monthly change
a. Pain 27 24 1.903
21.8
2.247
14.1
-0.344
0.0042
b. Stiffness
27 24 1.985
18.8
2.254
12.4
-0.269
0.0024
c. Swelling
27 24 1.924
17.9
2.117
13.3
-0.193
0.00153
ESR 25 23 36.293
29.7
35.922
38.2
+0.371
0.7376
RF 27 24 6.698
45.5
6.834
41.7
-0.136
0.9635
__________________________________________________________________________
*Coefficient of variation.

As shown in Table 3, patients were observed during a total of 27 control periods (six-month periods during which they received placebo) and 24 test periods (six-month periods during which they received immune milk). One patient had sustained a physical injury to one of his ankles and feet. The pain in these joints was not evaluated, which accounts for there being a smaller number of periods of evaluation for these joints. The erythrocyte sedimentation rates for one patient were so extremely abnormal (more than two standard deviations removed from the mean of the values for the other patients) that they were not included. This omission accounts for the smaller number of observations reported for that variable.

The mean values and coefficients of variation (C.V.) are listed in the table for each variable. Differences between the means were calculated by subtracting the mean value obtained during the periods the patients received immune milk from that obtained during the periods they received the placebo. A favorable response to immune milk is indicated by negative values for AM stiffness (question 1) and Monthly change (questions 6a, b, and c) and by positive values for all other variables. An effective response to immune milk was obtained for all data obtained from the questionnaires. Probabilities (P) indicate a high degree of statistical significance in every instance. The small mean differences obtained for erythrocyte sedimentation rate and rheumatoid factor titer were not significant. When erythrocyte sedimentation rates were considered on an individual basis, however, four of the twenty patients studied had statistically significant decreases while receiving immune milk.

Although immune milk had no significant effect on the mean values for rheumatoid factor titer, examination of individual patients revealed some interesting responses. Seven of the twenty patients studied had negative rheumatoid factor titers on at least one occasion during the period they were receiving immune milk. Four of them became negative during the period that they received immune milk and their titers failed to become positive during the following six-month period when they received the control (placebo) milk as shown in FIG. 2. Continuation of the study past this reporting period reveals that 13 of 25 patients lost the rheumatoid factor from their blood.

The scientist in charge of this study personally interviewed each patient at monthly intervals, and recorded their answers to the questions. Every effort was made not to influence the patient's answers. The patients were initially informed and were frequently reminded that, during certain periods of the study, they would receive a placebo. It was anticipated that this knowledge would serve as an inducement for the patients to answer the questions objectively and without bias. At no time were the patients informed whether they were receiving immune milk or the placebo.

The question regarding medication taken "yesterday" (question #3) and the question regarding gold shots, Plaquenil and cortisone shots (question #4) are objective and are of primary importance in considering answers given to the other questions. These questions are important for two reasons:

(1) if the immune milk is effective in relieving symptoms of the disease, the patient would be expected to take fewer medicines that were allowed ad libitum. On an average, patients reported that they took four less aspirins or their equivalent per day during the periods that they received immune milk. They also reported that they received fewer gold shots. Plaquenil and cortisone shots during these periods; and

(2) if patients took smaller quantities of analgesics and other medicines useful in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, one would expect them to report increased discomfort unless the immune milk was influencing the disease favorably.

As noted in Table 2 3significantly less joint involvement was reported during periods that the patients received immune milk even though they were taking less medicines for their arthritis.

Patients started on the study at monthly intervals over a one-year period, and the type of milk product (immune milk or placebo) that they initially received was randomized. The observation that positive responses or improvement were obtained for all parameters of the questionnaire, and that these mean responses were statistically significant strongly indicate that immune milk had a beneficial effect on the patients. This conclusion is reinforced by the observation that 20% of the patients experienced a statistically significant (p<0.05) decrease in erythocryte sedimentation rate while receiving immune milk.

Results of the rheumatoid factor titers are difficult to evaluate. This is due at least in part , at least in part, to the fact that the origin and role of rheumatoid factors in the etiology and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis is not understood. Rose et al, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 68:1 (1948) showed that sheep red blood cells that were sensitized with rabbit antibody underwent agglutination in the presence of blood serum from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The test depends on the specific reaction between normal immunoglobulin (either rabbit or human Ig G) with rheumatoid factors. The specificities exhibited by the rheumatoid factor are like those that would be expected of antibody against Ig G (Epstein, et al, 1956) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 91:235(1956)).

The presence of rheumatoid factors has been correlated with disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis and can be identified in proteins precipitated in the tissues of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Although a small percentage of patients with rheumatoid arthritis do not have positive rheumatoid factor titers, it is generally agreed by most rheumatologists that positive agglutination reactions do not revert to negative even when the disease is in remission. DeForest, et al (1958) Arth. & Rheum. 1:387, (1958), however, described a small number of patients who had positive rheumatoid factor titers that reverted to negative following a remission. When recrudescense of the disease occurred, the test again became positive. Aho, et al (1959) Ann. Exp. Fenn. 37:377 (1959) noted, however, the most patients whose disease had become inactive remained serologically positive. The fact that negative titers were observed in 60% of our patients and that in half of these, the titers remained negative for six months, proves that immune milk is affecting a primary etiologic factor responsible for rheumatoid arthritis.

The effect of immune milk in alleviating the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis is particularly relevant when considered on the basis of the recently described relationship between the histocompatibility antigens (HL-A) and the susceptibility to rheumatic disease (Brewerton, 1976) Arth. & Rheum. 19:656. (1976)). Histocompatibility antigens are genetically determined antigens that are found on all human cells. The genes controlling their inheritance are called histocompatibility genes. There are now known to be over 40 of these genetically determined antigens. They are responsible for rejection of tissue grafts made between individuals other than identical twins. Superficially the HL-A antigens resemble ABO blood groups in that they are inherited for a lifetime. Their functions is are not yet known, except in the highly artificial situation produced by transplantation. It is known, however, that the histocompatibility genes are closely linked with the immune response genes on the sixth chromosome. In this relationship, they may determine the immune response of the individual to a foreign invader, such as a bacteria. bacterium.

Persons with HLA-B27 appear to be particularly susceptible to a variety of rheumatic diseases. It is postulated that this histocompatibility antigen dictates a type of immune response which in the presence of other predisposing factors leads to rheumatoid arthritis. After an intestinal infection with Yersinia enterocolitica, some patients develop an acute peripheral arthritis (Ahvonen, et al, 1969) Acta. Rheum. Scand. 15:232 (1969)). Similarly, after salmonella infection, about 2% of patients develop acute peripheral arthritis (Warren, Am. Rheum. Dis. 29;484 1970). HLA-B27 was found in 43 of 49 patients with yersinia arthritis and in 15 of 16 with salmonella arthritis (Aho. 1974) Ann. Exp. Fenn. 37:377 (1974)). It is an attractive possibility that infective agents may thrive in the intestinal tract without giving rise to local symptoms. In patients with HLA-B27, a host response is established that results in arthritis. Thus, it is not necessary for the infective agent to gain entry into the joints. Immune milk is beneficial to patients with rheumatoid arthritis because it contains antibodies that effectively inactivate or neutralize offending bacteria and/or their metabolic products.

Stolle, Ralph J., Beck, Lee R.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
5871731, Dec 22 1995 Oral administration of immunoglobulin preparations for treatment of chronic pain syndrome
6090380, Jan 12 1994 Regents of the University of California, The Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by oral administration of pooled human immunoglobulin
6096310, Apr 15 1997 Oral immunotherapy of bacterial overgrowth
6770280, Nov 15 2001 UNICREDIT BANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH Treatment of menorrhagia, hypermenorrhea, dysmenorrhea and menstrual migraines by the administration of an antibacterial milk product
6939543, Jun 16 1997 Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine; Sunol Molecular Corporation Opsonic and protective monoclonal and chimeric antibodies specific for lipoteichoic acid of gram positive bacteria
7884198, Jun 16 1997 The Henry M. Jackon Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine; ALTOR BIOSCIENCE CORPORATION Polynucleotides encoding humanized and chimeric antibodies specific for lipoteichoic acid of gram positive bacteria
Patent Priority Assignee Title
1636445,
2011225,
2166963,
2385443,
3127318,
3128230,
3139382,
3376198,
3461200,
3480610,
3487148,
3532790,
3553317,
3626057,
3646193,
3911108,
3917818,
3962422, Feb 18 1975 MILES INC Method for immunizing nursing piglets against transmissible gastroenteritis(TGE) virus
3975517, May 25 1972 GUELPH, UNIVERSITY OF Enteric disease vaccine
4051235, Apr 22 1976 Method of preparing bovine colostrum for use in treating livestock
4141970, May 07 1975 Internationale Octrooimaatschappij "Octropa" B.V. Method for enhancing the resistance of new born mammalian young to gastro-intestinal infections
4160825, Nov 02 1973 UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION,INC Antibody-active protein composition
4284623, Nov 09 1979 Method of treating inflammation using bovine milk
4324782, Jan 28 1974 Dental caries inhibiting product of immunized cow's milk having antibodies specific to killed Streptococcus mutans cells
4377569, Jan 21 1980 Method of treating animals to resist infectious diseases
4402938, May 29 1980 Impro Products, Inc. Food and the method of extracting the same from colostrum and milk
AU214582,
CA587849,
DE1161659,
DE2307975,
DE2516403,
EP64103,
FI32472,
GB1211876,
GB1505523,
GB2013691A,
GB608596,
GB837695,
GB988135,
//
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 11 1988Stolle Research and Development Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jun 16 1998Stolle Research and Development CorporationSTOLLE MILK BIOLOGICS, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0101970683 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Apr 15 1991M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247.
Jul 18 1995M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Aug 07 1995ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Aug 26 1999SM02: Pat Holder Claims Small Entity Status - Small Business.
Sep 21 1999M285: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity.
Sep 23 1999ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Sep 27 1999RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 02 19944 years fee payment window open
Oct 02 19946 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 02 1995patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 02 19972 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 02 19988 years fee payment window open
Oct 02 19986 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 02 1999patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 02 20012 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 02 200212 years fee payment window open
Oct 02 20026 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 02 2003patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 02 20052 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)