A granular pesticide composition is prepared by reacting polyvinyl alcohol, pesticide, a borate, and optional filler(s) in water until a gel is formed, drying the gel, and then grinding the product to the desired particle size. The product is then applied to the soil for controlling pests.
|
1. A granular slow release soil pesticide composition comprising by weight based on the total composition of from about 5 to about 90% of polyvinyl alcohol, from about 1 to about 20% of a borate, from about 2 to about 50% of a compatible pesticide, and 0 to about 80% of filler(s) prepared by mixing from about 5 to about 90% by weight of (a) an aqueous solution of polyvinyl alcohol wherein the solids concentration of polyvinyl alcohol is about 10% and from about 2 to about 50% of a compatible pesticide plus 0 to about 80% of and optionally at least one filler selected from the class consisting of diatomites, attapulgites, bentonites, talcs, montmorillonites, perlites, vermiculites, calcium carbonates, corn cob grits, wood flour, lignin sulfonates, and mixtures thereof with from about 1 to about 20% of (b) a borate until said ingredients (a) and (b) react to form a gel, drying the gel, and grinding the dried product to the desired particle size.
2. The composition of
3. The composition of
4. A method of controlling pests comprising applying an effective amount of the composition of
a. preparing a solution or dispersion of such pesticide in a matrix-forming material comprising an aqueous solution of a gel-forming polyvinyl alcohol wherein said aqueous solution has a solids concentration of said polyvinyl alcohol of about 10%, wherein the relative amount of said polyvinyl alcohol with respect to said pesticide is sufficient to entrap said pesticide within a matrix of said polyvinyl alcohol; b. reacting said polyvinyl alcohol with a borate to form a continuous insolubilized matrix gel having entrapped therein uniformly dispersed, discontinuous domains of said pesticide; and c. recovering free-flowing particles of said entrapped pesticide. 6. A composition of matter produced by the process of claim 5.
|
This is an application for reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 4,440,746 granted Apr. 3, 1985.
This invention relates to a composition and method of treating the soil with a slow release matrix-carried pesticide for controlled, sustained release of active agents contained within the matrix to protect plants from damage by various pests. More particularly, the invention comprehends the use of a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-borate based release system for pesticides applied to the soil. U.S. Pat. No. 4,110,431 discloses the use of polyvinyl alcohol-borate complexes formed by water activation of mixtures of the PVA and borax in situ for attaching plant treatment additives to plane foliage. Japanese Patent No. 74/48073 describes the use of borax to harden PVA used in the form of micro-capsules to encapsulate perfume and flame retardants. South African Patent Nos. 69/00122 and 69/00088 teach the use of PVA-borate capsules for plasticizers and dyes.
The present invention is directed to a granular, slow release matrix-carried pesticide prepared by reacting an aqueous solution of polyvinyl alcohol and the desired pesticide plus optional filler(s) with a borate with agitation until the reaction is complete forming a gel, drying the gel, and grinding the dried product to the desired particle size. This produce is then applied to the soil where it slowly releases the pesticide for controlling the desired pest.
The present invention requires a water soluble polyvinyl alcohol, a borate, and optional filler(s). When the pesticide-containing polyvinyl alcohol solution and the borate are combined, they form a didiol complex, as indicated below: ##STR1## The reaction mixture thereby gels and entraps the pesticide in a matrix. The matrix is freed from water by drying, and then further refined by grinding and screening to the desired particle size. Granulates in the 14-40 mesh range are preferred.
Any pesticide which is compatible with the matrix can be employed for the present invention. Typical examples are chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-methyl, methyl parathion, parathion, diazinon, fonofos, fensulfothion, phorate, trifluralin, etc., which can be used undiluted, in the form of suited solutions, on fillers, or in combinations.
As far as polyvinyl alcohol is concerned, any water soluble grade can be used in the practice of this invention. Suited typical commercial products are the various partially or fully hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetates sold in various molecular weight ranges under the trade names of Gelvatol, Vinol, Elvanol, etc. Preferred are products which are characterized by high solubility/low viscosity in water.
For effecting gelation of PVA, various sources of borate ions can be used. Suited materials are alkali metal, alkaline earth metal and ammonium salts of borate anions such as tetraborate and metaborate anions. Examples are sodium borate (borax), sodium metaborate, and potassium borate. Also combinations of boric acid and alkalizing agents are effective.
With respect to optional filler(s), a large variety of powdered or granular materials can be employed in the practice of this invention. Examples are various diatomites, attapulgites, bentonites, talcs, montmorillonites, perlites, vermiculites, calcium carbonates, corn cob grits, wood flour, lignin sulfonates, etc.
The amounts of the various ingredients in the total formulation can vary widely, and range from about 5-90% (by weight) of PVA, 2-50% of the active ingredient(s), 0-80% of the filler(s), and 1-20% of borate. Preferred ranges are: 5-70% of PVA, 5-30% of active ingredient(s), and 30-80% of filler(s). The amount of borate required to effect gelation varies with the type and amount of PVA and filler(s) used in the particular formulation and is best determined experimentally.
Twenty grams of PVA (marketed by the Monsanto Corporation under the tradename Gelvatol 9000) were dissolved in 180 grams of deionized water to yield 200 grams of a 10% PVA solution. Ten grams of a technical grade methyl parathion (76% active) was dispersed in the 10% PVA solution. Twenty-one grams of a 10% sodium borate (borax) in water solution was then added to the PVA-methyl parathion dispersion and reacted with stirring until an opaque gel formed. The PVA-methyl parathion gel was dried in a forced air oven at 55°C for 16 hours, yielding 29.7 grams of product. The dried product was then ground in a blender to a particle size that would pass through a number 14 mesh screen but remained on a number 40 mesh screen. This particulate material was found to contain 25.1% active ingredient.
Eight grams of Gelvatol 9000 were dissolved in 72 grams deionized water yielding 80 grams of a 10% PVA solution. Into this 5 grams of Dursban XM (a commercial chlorpyrifos at 65% active ingredient) was dispersed. Three grams of sodium borate (borax) were then dissolved in 15 grams of water and added to the PVA-Dursban XM dispersion and reacted until a gel precipitate formed. This gel precipitate was then dried in an exhaust hood for 24 hours to yield 14.2 grams of product. The dried product was then ground to a particle size that would pass through a number 14 mesh screen but yet remained on a number 40 mesh screen. The granular product was found to contain 14.5% active ingredient.
Five grams of Gelvatol 9000 were dissolved in 45 grams deionized water. To this solution 19.0 grams of methyl parathion-loaded Diatomite [prepared by soaking 13.5 grams of Celatom MN-39 (Eagle Pitcher) with 4.5 grams technical methyl parathion in ∼40 grams methylene chloride, and removing volatile components at ∼50°C/130 mm Hg] were added, followed by dropwise addition of 5 grams of warm 10% borax solution. The resulting gel was dried in an exhaust hood for 24 hours, and then in an oven at ∼75°C for 21/2 hours. The dry product (23.4 grams) was ground in a blender and then classified to yield 14.3 grams product of 14-40 mesh size. It contained 13.2% active ingredient.
The granular product of Example I was tested in a laboratory soil bioassay using 3 day oid housefly larvae as test organisms. Twenty-five housefly larvae were exposed to soil at intervals of 3, 10, 17, 38, and 45 days following treatment with the granular product and the number of adult flies emerging from the soil was counted. The granular product was used at a rate equivalent to 1/2 pound of active ingredient per acre applied in 6" bands spaced 40" apart.
For the sake of comparison, a commercial formulation of methyl parathion was also tested at the same level of active ingredient and the results of both products were recorded in Table I. % Control is defined as the percent reduction in adult housefly emergence.
TABLE I |
______________________________________ |
% Control |
3 10 17 38 45 |
______________________________________ |
PVA Matrix 39.0 93.8 91.9 65.3 76.4 |
Methyl Parathion EC |
21.0 10.4 14.9 3.9 0.0 |
Control 0.0 4.0 1.3 10.7 23.4 |
______________________________________ |
The granular product of Example II was then tested for bioactivity in soil as in Example IV.
For the sake of comparison, a commercial formulation of chlorpyrifos (Lorsban® 15G) was tested. The results of both products were recorded in Table II as follows:
TABLE II |
______________________________________ |
% Control |
3 10 17 24 31 |
______________________________________ |
PVA Matrix 97.9 98.0 96.9 80.7 75.0 |
Lorsban 15G |
91.4 96.0 96.9 68.6 39.6 |
Control 6.7 0.0 4.0 1.3 6.0 |
______________________________________ |
In the laboratory soil bioassay with 3 day old housefly larvae, the product of Example III showed the following activity as compared to the methyl parathion-loaded filler without PVA matrix:
TABLE III |
______________________________________ |
% Control |
3 17 31 45 |
______________________________________ |
PVA Matrix 84.3 60.9 74.0 72.0 |
MP-loaded Filler |
94.8 57.9 54.0 0 |
Control 4.0 2.7 0 10.7 |
______________________________________ |
As evident, the PVA matrix formulation exhibited a much longer-lasting insecticidal activity than a comparable formulation without the matrix.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5288501, | Jul 04 1991 | MERZ PHARMA GMBH & CO KGAA | Mechanically-stable, readily-disintegratable tablets made of small preformed particles containing active ingredients |
5409707, | Aug 08 1990 | Carlton Lahey Chemicals, Inc. | Oil emulsifying extender formulation imparting sustaining properties to agricultural products |
5981719, | Mar 09 1993 | Baxter International Inc; BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA A CORPORATION OF SWITZERLAND | Macromolecular microparticles and methods of production and use |
6004572, | Jan 25 1996 | UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, THE | Time release delivery system |
6090925, | Mar 09 1993 | Baxter International Inc; BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA A CORPORATION OF SWITZERLAND | Macromolecular microparticles and methods of production and use |
6268053, | Mar 09 1993 | Baxter International Inc; BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA A CORPORATION OF SWITZERLAND | Macromolecular microparticles and methods of production and use |
6335026, | Jun 16 1993 | Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. | Pesticidal compositions |
7846463, | May 11 2005 | Grain Processing Corporation | Pest control composition and method |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2098836, | |||
3265638, | |||
4110431, | Nov 12 1976 | Weyerhaeuser Company | Wet weather resistant binder composition for adhering a plant treatment additive powder formulation to plant foliage |
4439488, | Feb 26 1982 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of | Encapsulation by entrapment within polyhydroxy polymer borates |
GB1222016, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 26 1985 | Atochem North America, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 06 1993 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Aug 06 1993 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Nov 07 1995 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 22 1995 | R169: Refund of Excess Payments Processed. |
Mar 31 1996 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 20 1994 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 1995 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 1995 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 20 1997 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 20 1998 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 1999 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 1999 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 20 2001 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 20 2002 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 20 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 20 2003 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 20 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |