A cylindrical permanent magnet suitable for use as the rotor magnet of a stepping motor. The magnet is a sintered cylindrical permanent magnet having a composition expressed by MO.nFe2 O3, where M represents Ba, Sr, Pb or mixture thereof, while n represents a value of 5 to 6. The sintered cylindrical permanent magnet is provided on its surface with multipolar anisotropy of more than 8 (eight) magnetic poles. Disclosed also is a method of producing the cylindrical permanent magnet.
|
3. A method of producing a cylindrical permanent magnet comprising the steps of forming a cylindrical green body from a material consisting essentially of MO.nFe2 O3, where M represents Ba, Sr or Pb and n being a value of 5 to 6, and containing 14 to 20% of water, subjecting the green body to multi-polar magnetic fields to impart a surface multipolar anisotropy of more than 8 (eight) poles, and then sintering the body.
1. A cylindrical permanent magnet, comprising:
a sintered material having a composition expressed by MO.nFe2 O3, where M represents Ba, Sr, Pb or a mixture thereof, and n is a value of 5 to 6, the magnet being characterized by a surface multipolar anisotropy of more than eight poles imparted to the cylindrical portion of the magnet, and the magnet being further characterized by having an inside diameter d1 and an outside diameter d2 of the cylindrical portion which satisfy the condition:
d1 /d2 =1-K1 π/P where P is the number of poles imparted to the cylindrical portion of the magnet, and K1 is a constant defined by 1.5∝1.76≦K1 ≦2.5. 4. A method of producing a cylindrical permanent magnet according to
d1 /d2 =1-K1 π/P where, K1 representing a constant value not smaller than 1.5, said sintered body being magnetized at its surface to develop a multiplicity of magnetic poles. 5. A method of producing a cylindrical permanent magnet according to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The present invention broadly relates to a magnet suitable for use as the rotor magnet of a stepping motor and, more particularly, to a cylindrical permanent magnet having a surface multipolar anisotropy.
In order to effect a multipolar magnetization on the surface of a permanent magnet, it is essential that the permanent magnet has a high coercive force and that the reversible magnetic permeability is around 1. To meet these demands, hitherto, ferrite magnets such as barium ferrite magnet, strontium ferrite magnet and so forth have been used as the permanent magnet for multipolar magnetization. Materials of such permanent magnets are stoichiometrically expressed by the MO·6Fe2 O3, where M represents an element such as Ba, Sr, Pb or their mixtures with or without bivalent metal such as Ca. Actually, however, the MO content is somewhat excessive so that the materials of such permanent magnets are expressed by MO·nFe2 O3, where n represents a value of 5 to 6.
Various cylindrical permanent magnets have been proposed and used hitherto, such as isotropic ferrite magnet, ring anisotropic ferrite magnet, and plastic magnets formed by dispersing ferrite magnetic powder in a matrix such as synthetic rubber, synthetic resin or natural rubber.
These known permanent magnets, however, suffer from various disadvantages as follows. Namely, the isotropic ferric magnet, which is usually produced by compacting, cannot provide satisfactory magnetic properties, since magnetic rubber is oriented in direction at random. The ring anisotropic magnet 11 as shown in FIG. 1 has a radial particle orientation as shown by arrows B. The magnetization after the sintering, however, is conducted by means of a magnetizing yoke A composed of a yoke member 1 formed of ferromagnetic material and coils 2 as shown in FIG. 2. Therefore, the direction of particle orientation and the direction of line of magnetic force indicated by arrows C locally discord with each other. Thus, the ring anisotropic magnet 11 cannot provide effective particle orientation. Such ring anisotropic ferrite magnet is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,114,715 and 4,057,606. In the plastic permanent magnet 12 as shown in FIG. 3, the particle orientation coincides with the directions of lines of magnetic force indicated by arrow C. This plastic magnet 12, however, cannot provide sufficient amount of magnetic flux because of small residual magnetic flux density. Such plastic magnet is described in Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 57-130407.
In addition, the conventional cylindrical permanent magnet could not avert from the problem of large inertia force which is caused inevitably by increased wall thickness for obtaining a high magnetic properties.
Accordingly, an object of the invention is to provide a multipolar surface magnetized magnet having a high surface magnetic flux density.
Another object of the invention is to provide a permanent magnet which exhibits a high holding torque when used as the rotor magnet of a stepping motor.
To these ends, according to the invention, there is provided a sintered cylindrical permanent magnet having a magneto-plumbite type crystalline structure expressed by MO·nFe2 O3, where M represents Ba, Sr, 15 Pb or their mixture and n being a value of 5 to 6, the magnet being provided in its cylindrical surface with multipolar anisotropy.
The advantage of the invention is remarkable particularly when more than 8 (eight) poles are provided on the outer peripheral surface of the cylindrical body of the magnet.
The term "surface anisotropy" in this specification is used to mean a state in which magnetic poles of different polarities actually exist or are formable on the same surface of the permanent magnet such as cylindrical outer peripheral surface, and easy axes of magnetization of ferrite particles, which have magnetoplumbite crystalline structure having unidirectional magnetic anisotropy, are substantially aligned with the lines, normally arcuate lines, interconnecting the magnetic poles through the body of the magnet.
The invention aims also at providing a cylindrical permanent magnet in which the particle orientation for attaining effective amount of magnetic flux is achieved in advance to the sintering thereby to impart the surface multipolar anisotropy while attaining high magnetic properties and a reduced inertia force.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become clear from the following description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 shows the particle orientation in a conventional cylindrical permanent magnet;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of a part of permanent magnet and magnetizing yoke;
FIG. 3 is an illustration of the directions of lines of magnetic force in a permanent magnet;
FIG. 4 shows surface magnetic flux density and inertia force in relation to the wall thickness as observed in a cylindrical permanent magnet; and
FIG. 5 shows the surface magnetic flux density and inertia moment in relation to a change in the inside diameter of the cylindrical permanent magnet.
Generally, the multipolar cylindrical magnet for use as the rotor of a motor is required to satisfy both of the demands for high magnetic properties and low inertia force. These two demands, however, are generally incompatible with each other. If the wall thickness (t) of the cylindrical permanent magnet is increased for attaining a high surface magnetic flux density Bo, the inertia force I is increased undesirably, as will be understood from FIG. 4. To the contrary, if the wall thickness (t) is reduced to satisfy the requirement for smaller inertia force, the surface magnetic flux density Bo is decreased unfavourably. Accordingly, it is necessary to optimize the size of the magnet so as to obtain sufficiently small inertia force without being accompanied by substantial reduction in the surface magnetic flux density Bo.
According to the invention, the inside and outside diameters of the cylindrical permanent magnet are selected to meet the following condition.
T=D1 /D2 =1-K1 π/P (K1 ≦1.5)
Where, D1 represents the inside diameter of magnet, D2 represents the outside diameter of permanent magnet, P represents the number of magnetic poles and K1 represents a constant.
In the aforementioned formula, the inside to outside diameter ratio T ranges between 0 and 1∅ As the ratio gets closer to 1, the wall thickness (t) becomes smaller so that the surface magnetic flux density BO gets smaller. To the contrary, as the ratio T approaches 0 (zero), the wall thickness (t) gets larger to make the magnet resemble a pillar or solid cylinder, resulting in an increased inertia force I.
The right side of the aforementioned formula suggests that an increase in number of magnetic poles P causes an increase in the inside to outside diameter ratio T resulting in a reduced wall thickness (t). On the other hand, the wall thickness (t) is increased as the number P of magnetic poles is decreased. It is thus possible to obtain the optimum inside and outside diameters, i.e. the diameter ratio T, also on consideration of the number P of magnetic poles.
An explanation will be made hereinunder as to how the formula mentioned before is derived. As the outer peripheral surface of the cylindrical permanent magnet is magnetized to develop magnetic poles of a number P, the circumferential distance between adjacent magnetic poles, i.e. the distance along the outer peripheral surface of the cylindrical magnet between the centers of adjacent magnetic poles of different polarities, ties, is expressed by πD2 /P. The penetration depth of the magnetic flux is then expressed by K1 πD2 /P, where the constant K1 is determined experimentally as explained later. Since the thickness of the wall portion not penetrated by the magnetic flux does not constitute an essential part of the cylindrical permanent magnet, the effective inside diameter D1 of the magnet is expressed as follows.
D1 =D2 -K1 πD2 /P
The following formula is derived by diving both sides of the above formula by D2.
D1 /D2 =1-K1 π/P
The optimum ratio T between the inside diameter and the outside diameter of the cylindrical permanent magnet of the invention is determined by this formula.
An explanation will be made hereinunder as to an example of experimental determination of the constant value K1, with specific reference to FIG. 5. Namely, FIG. 5 shows how the surface magnetic flux density Bo and the inertia moment I are changed in accordance with changes in the inside diameter D1 and the constant value K1, in a cylindrical permanent magnet having an outside diameter D2 of 26 mm and 24 (twenty four) magnetic poles in total. From this Figure, it will be seen that a specifically high surface magnetic density is obtained when the constant K1 takes a value not smaller than 1.5. Considering that the smaller inertia force ensures higher performance of rotor magnet, the constant value K1 is selected to meet the condition of 1.5≦K1 ≦2.5.
The cylindrical permanent magnet of the invention is formed from a material containing, in addition to the major constituents mentioned before, a suitable amount of additives for imparting a self-supporting force, as well as 14 to 20% of water for permitting the rotation of particles when the material is placed under the influence of a magnetic field. Then, the formed body is placed under the influence of the magnetic field to orientate the particles in the direction of lines of magnetic force, and is then sintered to become the permanent magnet as the final product. The magnet, if desired, is machined to a final shape.
The water content is selected to range between 14 and 20% because any water content below 14% makes the compacted body too hard to permit smooth orientation of particles for attaining desired anisotropy, resulting in an imperfect magnetic properties, while a water content in excess of 20% seriously deteriorates the self-supporting force of the compacted body to make the forming materially impossible.
To apply pulse magnetic fields to the compacted body, the coil of the yoke may be connected to an instantaneous D.C. power supply, wherein an A.C. power source is used as an input and the A.C. current is rectified and raised to a predetermined D.C. voltage to charge a group of capacitors which effect discharge through thyristors.
With respect to the magnitude of the pulse magnetic field, a magnetic field of over about 10,000 Oersted is enough to accomplish this invention. Not only one but a combination of two pulse magnetic fields may be applied.
An experimental example of the invention will be described hereinunder.
A green body having an outside diameter, inside diameter and axial length of 33 mm, 23 mm and 30 mm, respectively, was formed by a compressing machine from a material consisting of powdered Sr ferrite (SrO·5·6Fe2 O3) containing 18% of water. The green body was inserted into a multipolar magnetizing yoke A as shown in FIG. 2 and was subjected to a magnetic field of more than 3,000 Oe. The green body was then, sintered at 1200°C following 24 hour drying. The sintered body was machined to have an outside diameter, inside diameter and axial length of 26 mm, 18 mm and 20 mm, respectively. The body 3 was then magnetized by a multipolar magnetizing yoke having a shape similar to the magnetizing yoke A shown in FIG. 2, and the surface magnetic flux density BO was measured, the result of which is shown in Table 1 below together with the values obtained with a conventional isotropic magnet, ring anisotropic magnet and a plastic magnet by way of reference.
| TABLE 1 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Surface magnetic flux |
| density B., (G) |
| ______________________________________ |
| isotropic magnet 500 |
| ring anisotropic magnet |
| 1000 |
| plastic magnet 1000 |
| magnet of invention |
| 1400 |
| ______________________________________ |
As will be understood from Table 1 above, the permanent magnet of the invention has attained about 40% increase in the surface magnetic flux density as compared with conventional magnets. The cylindrical permanent magnet of the invention used in this experiment had an outside diameter, inside diameter and axial length of 26 mm, 18 mm and 20 mm, respectively, and had 24 (twenty four) magnetic poles in total. In addition, the constant value K1, is selected to range between 1.5 and 2.5 in view of the curve shown in FIG. 5, so that the size of the permanent magnet is optimized to provide a reduced inertia force without being accompanied by substantial reduction in the surface magnetic flux density.
Using the permanent magnets shown in Table 1 as the rotors of the stepping motor, an experiment was conducted by applying a DC voltage of 12 V to confirm the holding torques produced by these magnets, the result of which is shown in Table 2 below together with the magnetic properties of these permanent magnets.
| TABLE 2 |
| ______________________________________ |
| holding |
| torque magnetic properties |
| (g · cm) |
| Br (G) Hc (Oe) |
| ______________________________________ |
| isotropic magnet |
| 660 2000 1700 |
| ring anisotropic |
| 720 3200 2700 |
| magnet |
| plastic magnet |
| 700 3000 2500 |
| magnet of invention |
| 900 2600 3000 |
| ______________________________________ |
Since the magnetic properties were all measured in the radial direction, the magnet of the invention exhibits quite a low residual induction Br of 2600 Gauss. This magnet, however, exhibits quite a high holding torque.
As has been described, the cylindrical permanent magnet of the invention is provided with the surface multipolar anisotropy prior to the sintering so that the particles are oriented in the magnetizing direction. The sintered permanent magnet of the invention, therefore, has an extremely high surface magnetic flux density which in turn permits a high magnetic properties. In addition, since the size of the magnet is optimized in view of the formula mentioned before, the weight and, hence, the inertia force of the magnet is decreased advantageously as compared with conventional magnets, without being accompanied by any substantial decrease in the magnetic properties. The reduced weight permits also an economical use of the material.
Although a specific embodiment applied to a rotor magnet of stepping motor has been explained, the described embodiment is not exclusive and various changes and modifications are possible without departing from the scope of the invention. For instance, the cylindrical permanent magnet of the invention may have an increased axial length so that it may be used in a copying machine incorporating a magnetic brush development for latent images.
Noguchi, Yoshihiro, Shimizu, Motoharu, Noda, Noriyuki
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 5399311, | Nov 15 1991 | Daido Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha | Radial anisotropic ring magnet with a sinusoidal waveform and producing method thereof |
| 5428332, | Apr 14 1992 | FLEXMAG INDUSTRIES, INC | Magnetized material having enhanced magnetic pull strength and process and apparatus for the multipolor magnetization of the material |
| 5457349, | Jun 30 1993 | Reciprocating electromagnetic engine | |
| 5691682, | Jan 10 1995 | Eastman Kodak Company | Very high field micro magnetic roller and method of making same |
| 5942961, | Apr 14 1992 | FLEXMAG INDUSTRIES, INC | Magnetized material having enhanced magnetic pull strength and a process and apparatus for the multipolar magnetization of the material |
| 7560841, | Jul 22 2003 | AICHI STEEL CORPORATION, LTD | Thin hybrid magnetization type ring magnet, yoke-equipped thin hybrid magnetization type ring magnet, and brush-less motor |
| 7750776, | Dec 14 2005 | Aichi Steel Corporation | Anisotropic bonded magnet for use in a 4-pole motor, a motor employing that magnet, and an alignment process apparatus for the anisotropic bonded magnet for use in a 4-pole motor |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3114715, | |||
| 4057606, | Jul 14 1972 | Fuji Electrochemical Co., Ltd. | Method of producing anisotropic ferrite magnet |
| JP130407, | |||
| JP5056594, | |||
| JP5674907, | |||
| JP57128909, | |||
| JP57130407, | |||
| JP5737803, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Oct 06 1989 | Hitachi Metals, Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Nov 09 1994 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Apr 04 1997 | M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Apr 20 1996 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Oct 20 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Apr 20 1997 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Apr 20 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Apr 20 2000 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Oct 20 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Apr 20 2001 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Apr 20 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Apr 20 2004 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Oct 20 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Apr 20 2005 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Apr 20 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |