A semi-permeable membrane which comprises #2# having high permeability characteristics is disclosed. This may comprise either
(i) a copolymer of acrylonitrile and at least one ionic or ionizable monomer, or
(ii) a copolymer of acrylonitrile, at least one ionic or ionizable monomer, and at least one non-ionic and non-ionizable monomer, or
(iii) a mixture of at least two copolymers as defined under (i) and/or (ii), or
(iv) a mixture of at least one copolymer as defined under (i) and/or (ii), and at least one copolymer of acrylonitrile and at least one non-ionic and non-ionizable monomer, the ionic or ionizable monomer units representing from 1 to 80 mole % of the monomer units in one of said copolymers, and representing from 1 to 50 mole % of the monomer units in the membrane, said membrane having a degree of salt rejection of less than 1% and a permeability to water of more than 100 liters/day.m2 at a relative pressure of 2 bars is provided having excellent properties for use in ultrafiltration and dialysis. A process for preparing a semi-permeable membrane is also provided which comprises treating a film containing at least one copolymer of acrylonitrile and an ionic or ionizable monomer, with water or an aqueous non-solvent mixture at a temperature between 60° and 250°C
|
#2# 1. A semi-permeable membrane material for use in an apparatus adapted for dialysis and ultrafiltration of blood, having the following characteristics:
(a) high ultrafiltration properties indicated by a permeability to water in an aqueous macromolecular (of a molecular weight greater than 500) solution of from 230 to 8000 l/day m2 at a relative pressure of 2 bars; (b) a thickness of less than 100 microns and greater than 0.5 microns; (c) a degree of rejection of salt as defined by ##EQU3## of less than 1%; (d) a degree of rejection of macromolecules defined by ##EQU4## which is from 90% to 100% for cattle albumin of a molecular weight of 70,000, when an aqueous solution comprising 10 g/l of cattle albumin and 9 g/l of NaCl is subjected to a relative pressure of 2 bars; (e) a high hemodialysis rate as represented by a reduction to a half the original concentration in 1.1 liters of human blood being reached after at most 1 hour 40 mn for urea and at most 2 hours 25 mn for creatinine, said blood circulated in a closed circuit at a rate of 12.5 cm3/mn over 625 cm2 of membrane, circulated dialysis bath having the same saline composition as the blood.
|
This is a orthogenicautogenous pressure); thereafter the heating was stopped and the vessel allowed to cool to ambient temperature whilst leaving the membrane immersed in the water in the vessel.
All the membranes thus prepared showed a zero degree of salt rejection. Their permeability to water was measured as follows:
12 cm2 of membrane were placed on a porous sintered metal plate; water was placed in contact with the free face of the membrane and a pressure of 2 bars applied thereto. The flow of water across the membrane was measured; this flow, expressed in liters/m2.day, is the permeability of the membrane to water.
Specific information relating to certain examples:
The polymer used was a mixture of two copolymers in a weight ratio of 43/57. The first was a copolymer of acrylonitrile and sodium methallylsulphonate in a weight ratio of 82/18; the second was a copolymer of acrylonitrile and styrene in a weight ratio of 85/15.
The polymer used was a mixture of equal weights of two copolymers; one was a copolymer of acrylonitrile and sodium methallylsulphonate in a weight ratio of 82/18, the other was a copolymer of acrylonitrile and butyl acrylate in a weight ratio of 85/15.
EXAMPLE 15
The polymer mixture used only differs from that of Example 14 in that the butyl acrylate was replaced by an equal weight of vinyl benzoate.
The membranes prepared in Example 1 to 16 were used firstly in ultrafiltration processes (A) and secondly in dialysis processes (B).
(A) 12 cm2 of membrane were placed on a porous sintered metal plate; an aqueous solution of a specified macromolecular product was placed in contact with the free face of the membrane and a pressure of 2 bars applied thereto; the flow of ultrafiltrate in liters/day.m2, as well as the degree of rejection expressed as a percentage, namely ##EQU2## was measured.
Tables II and III give details of the solution subjected to ultrafiltration, as well as the flow of ultrafiltrate and the degree of rejection of the macromolecule.
(B) A dialysis cell was divided into two compartments by a membrane having 10 cm2 surface area. 100 cm3 of an aqueous solution containing 9 g/l of NaCl, 1 g/l of thiourea and 10 g/l of cattle albumen (molecular weight: approx. 70,000) flowed in closed circuit through the first compartment: this solution, hereafter referred to as "synthetic blood", circulated in the compartment at a flow rate of 1l/hour. 100 cm3 of an aqueous solution containing 10 g of NaCl/l flowed in closed circuit through the second compartment, this solution being hereafter called the "dialysis bath"; it circulated in the compartment at a flow rate of 0.9 l/hour.
The rate of dialysis was measured by determining the time in minutes taken for the concentration of thiourea in the dialysis bath to reach 0.1 g/l; this time is indicated for certain membranes in Table (II).
TABLE I |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Example |
Nature of polymer |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Molar percentages of comonomers |
(made up to 100% with acrylonitrile) |
Sodium methallyl- |
2.094 |
3.32 |
3.71 |
5.74 |
6.35 |
7.16 2.60 |
3.33 2.58 |
-3.36 |
3.90 |
3.91 |
sulphonate |
Potassium vinyloxy- 3.40 |
benzenesulphonate |
Sodium vinylsulphonate 5.08 |
N-methyl-4-vinyl- 4.28 |
6.21 |
pyridinium sulphate |
Methyl methacrylate 5.79 |
Butyl acrylate 3.45 |
Vinyl benzoate 2.99 |
Vinylidene chloride 4.51 |
Acrylamide 7.97 |
Styrene 4.75 |
Specific viscosity |
0.812 |
1.039 |
0.743 |
0.980 |
1.026 |
0.962 1.192 |
0.62 0.374 |
0.926 0.63 |
(measured at 25°C, at |
2 g/l in DMF) |
Concentration of the |
9 8 8.5 |
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 10 10 7 |
copolymer solution |
(% by weight) |
Duration of drying in |
42 67 42 45 52 24 24 48 48 40 70 72 72 24 24 21 |
the oven, in hours |
Maximum temperature of |
180 |
147 |
146 |
113 |
104 |
92 146 |
140 |
140 |
146 |
146 |
147 |
145 145 |
145 |
120 |
the treatment water, |
in °C. |
Thickness of the mem- |
45 65 55 50 80 45 60 55 45 60 55 90 80 70 70 30 |
brane, in microns |
Permeability to water |
230 |
350 |
520 |
650 |
300 |
480 |
800 |
600 |
800 |
570 |
8000 |
2900 |
1800 |
1500 |
2600 |
360 |
under 2 bars pressure, |
in l/day · m2 |
Tensile strength of the |
130 130 |
100 90 |
membrane in kg/cm2 |
(measured at 23°C |
whilst wet) |
Tensile elongation at |
48 31 41 41 |
break, in % |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
TABLE II |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Example |
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Membrane used, prepared according to |
2 3 3 3 4 5 6 |
Example |
Ultrafiltration |
Nature of the initial solution |
subjected to ultrafiltration |
Concentration of NaCl in g/l |
9 9 5.85 |
0 9 9 9 |
Nature of the macromolecule |
cattle |
cattle |
pepsin |
dextran |
cattle |
cattle |
cattle |
albumen |
albumen albumen |
albumen |
albumen |
Average molecular weight of the |
70,000 |
70,000 |
36,000 |
10,000 |
70,000 |
70,000 |
70,000 |
macromolecule |
Concentration of macromolecule in g/l |
10 10 0.5 4 10 10 10 |
Results obtained |
Flow of ultrafiltrate in liters/day · m2 |
350 520 520 520 720 300 480 |
Degree of rejection in % |
100 100 70 50 98 98.5 100 |
Dialysis |
Rate of dialysis in minutes |
52 |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Example |
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Membrane used, prepared according to |
6 6 7 8 8 8 9 |
Example |
Ultrafiltration |
Nature of the initial solution |
subjected to ultrafiltration |
Concentration of NaCl in g/l |
5.85 0 9 9 0 0 9 |
Nature of the macromolecule |
lysozyme |
dextran |
cattle |
cattle |
dextran |
dextran |
cattle |
albumen |
albumen albumen |
Average molecular weight of the |
15,000 |
10,000 |
70,000 |
70,000 |
40,000 |
10,000 |
70,000 |
macromolecule |
Concentration of macromolecule in g/l |
0.5 4 10 10 4 4 1 |
Results obtained |
Flow of ultrafiltrate in liters/day · m2 |
480 480 760 600 600 600 700 |
Degree of rejection in % |
100 40 100 100 50 28 100 |
Dialysis |
Rate of dialysis in minutes 58 |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
TABLE III |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Example |
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Membrane used, prepared according to Example |
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 |
Ultrafiltration |
Nature of the initial solution |
subjected to ultrafiltration |
Concentration of NaCl in g/l |
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 |
Nature of the macromolecule |
cattle |
cattle |
cattle |
cattle |
cattle |
cattle |
cattle |
albumen |
albumen |
albumen |
albumen |
albumen |
albumen |
albumen |
Average molecular weight of the |
70,000 |
70,000 |
70,000 |
70,000 |
70,000 |
70,000 |
70,000 |
macromoleule |
Concentration of macromolecule in g/l |
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 |
Results obtained |
Flow of ultrafiltrate in liters/day · m2 |
480 720 1,000 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
1,330 |
360 |
Degree of rejection in % |
99 90 90 96 93 90 100 |
__________________________________________________________________________ |
Milk was concentrated in an ultrafiltration cell with the two compartments separated by a membrane prepared as in Example 3, having a useful surface area of 465 cm2. A relative pressure (relative to the second compartment) of 3 bars prevailed in the first compartment. The membrane was supported by a rigid plate of sintered polyethylene. Milk was circulated between this compartment and a storage reservoir; the rate of circulation at the membrane was 85 cm/second and the total weight of milk in circulation was initially 8.015 kg.
The whole operation, which was carried out at a temperature of +4° C., was continued for 11 hours 30 minutes. 4.007 kg of ultrafiltrate containing essentially, water, inorganic salts, lactose, and non-protein nitrogen-containing components had been collected in the second compartment; this amount of ultrafiltrate corresponds to a flow rate of 180 kg/day.m2 ; the milk obtained in the first compartment had thus been concentrated two-fold.
Example 38 was repeated with the following modifications: the rate of circulation of the milk in the first compartment was 1 m/second, the temperature was +45°C, and the relative pressure between the two compartments was 6 bars.
After 11 hours 30 minutes, 6.835 kg of ultrafiltrate had been collected, corresponding to a flow rate of 307 kg/day.m2 ; the milk obtained in the first compartment had been concentrated about seven-fold.
The dialysis experiment of Example 18 was repeated, replacing the so-called "synthetic blood" solution by cattle blood to which was added 1 g/l of thiourea as well as 25% by volume (the percentage being expressed relative to the blood) of a solution consisting of: 1.66 g of citric acid, 0.6 g of sodium hydroxide, 3 g of glucose and water sufficient to give 100 cm3 of solution.
The rate of dialysis (expressed in minutes, in accordance with the definition given above) was 91 minutes.
The following were introduced into a glass reactor: 330 g of a copolymer of acrylonitrile and sodium methallylsulphonate in the relative weight ratio of 91/9; the specific viscosity of the copolymer (measured at 25° C. in a 2 g/l solution in DMF) being 1; and 1600 cm3 Of DMF.
The mixture was stirred for 1 hour at 20°C and then for 4 hours at 90°C The gases which may have been dissolved were then removed by placing the reactor under a pressure of 100 mm/Hg for 30 minutes; the viscosity of the solution at 23°C was about 200 poises.
This solution was continuously cast onto a 17 em wide endless stainless steel belt circulating at a speed of 50 cm/minute; a 0.2 mm thick liquid film was thus desposited. The strip then passed into a 1.2 m long ventilated oven heated to 150°C and was thereafter cooled to 20°C; the film of acrylonitrile copolymer was moisturised by passing it over a fabric wetted with water and detached from the steel belt on which it was carried; this film then passed for 10 cm, through a bath of water at 90°C; it issued therefrom at a speed of 140 cm/minute, corresponding to a degree of stretching of 180%. The stretched film then passed through a bath of water at 75°C over 2 m, without being subjected to any tension whatsover; it issued from this bath at a speed of 100 cm/minute and then passed through a bath of glycerine (a mixture of water and glycerine in a weight ratio of 20/80) over 2 m, after which it was dried by passing between two rollers so as to drive off the excess glycerine.
A 30μ thick membrane was thus obtained; it had a permeability to water, under 2 bars, of 860 liters/day.m2 and can be stored dry. Its degree of rejection was 100% for cattle albumen (molecular weight: 70,000) and for ovalbumin (molecular weight: 45,000); it was only 53% for dextran (molecular weight: 40,000).
Example 41 is repeated, varying the degree of stretching. The following results were obtained:
______________________________________ |
Example |
42 43 44 |
______________________________________ |
Degree of stretching in % |
165 135 100 |
Permeability to water under |
505 360 216 |
2 bars (l/day · m2) |
Degree of rejection in % |
Cattle albumen, 100 100 100 |
molecular weight: 70,000 |
Ovalbumin, 100 100 100 |
molecular weight: 45,000 |
Pepsin, >90% >90% 100 |
molecular weight: 36,000 |
Lysozyme >90% >90% 100 |
molecular weight: 15,000 |
Dextran, 74 78 85 |
molecular weight: 40,000 |
______________________________________ |
A membrane was prepared as in Example 41, but with a degree of stretching of 185%.
This membrane was used for the ultrafiltration of river-water (the Rhone, downstream from the city of Lyon) containing fecal streptococci and "Escherichia coli" bacteria. The difference in pressure between the first and the second compartment of the ultrafiltration apparatus was 2 bars; in the first compartment the river-water circulated over the surface of the membrane at a speed of 115 cm/second; a permeate of potable water was collected at the rate of 1150 l/day.m2 ; the potable character of this water was determined by bacteriological examinations, which showed the total absence of the bacteria mentioned above.
The membrane of Example 41 was used for the ultrafiltration of 3.5 liters of whey having a solids content of 65 g/l, a lactose concentration of 50 g/l and a protein concentration of 7.6 g/l.
The difference in pressure between the two ultrafiltration compartments was 2.5 bars; the speed of circulation of the whey in the first compartment was 50 cm/second at the surface of the membrane.
The ultrafiltration was continued until 3.250 1 of ultrafiltrate had been obtained; the latter contained 59 g of solids/l, 50 g of lactose/l, and 0.7 g of proteins/l; the concentrate (withdrawn from the first compartment) had a solids content of 168 g/l, a lactose concentration of 48 g/l and a protein concentration of 96 g/l.
Example 46 was repeated, using the membrane of Example 44.
An ultrafiltrate having a solids content of 56 g/l and a lactose concentration of 50 g/l, and containing no proteins, was obtained; the concentrate had a solids content of 155 g/l, a lactose concentration of 58 g/l and a protein concentration of 93 g/l.
Human blood was ultrafiltered at 37°C in an apparatus of the filter-press type with 8 compartments each possessing a membrane of 125 cm2 surface area, prepared as in Example 41.
The blood circulated in the apparatus in contact with the membranes at a flow rate of 0.2 l/minute; the difference in pressure between the compartments on either side of the membrane was 300 mm/Hg. After running for 8 hours, the protein concentration of the ultrafiltrate was 0.27 g/l; the haematocrit reading of the circulating blood had not varied significantly; the flow rate of ultrafiltrate was 0.4 l/hour.
A membrane was prepared as in Example 41 with the following modifications. The reactor was charged initially with 71 grams of an acrylonitrile/sodium methallylsulphonate copolymer (weight ratio 91/9; having a specific viscosity of 0.979), 179 grams of an acrylonitrile/sodium methallylsulphonate copolymer (in a weight ratio of 89/11; having a specific viscosity of 1.123) and 1200 cm3 of dimethyl formamide.
The drawing ratio was 186%.
A dialysis cell, maintained at 37°C, was separated into two compartments by 625 cm2 of the membrane prepared above. In the first compartment of this cell human blood was circulated, in a closed circuit with a flow of 12.5 cm3 /MM; the total volume of blood in circulation was 1.1 liters and the blood contained 1.5 g/l of urea and 0.15 g/l of creatine creatinine. In the second compartment was circulated a dialysis bath having the same saline composition as the blood.
A reduction to a half the original concentration in the blood was observed after 1 hour 40 mins for the urea and after 2 hours 25 mins for the creatine creatinine.
An ascitic liquid containing 20 g/l of protein was removed from the peritoneum of a patient suffering from cirrhosis of the liver. This ascitic liquid was introduced to an ultrafiltration apparatus comprising eleven elementary cells arranged in series having a total membrane area of 1450 cm2, prepared as in Example 49 but with a stretching ratio of 182%. The pressure differential across these membranes was 200 mm Hg (the excess pressure being on the side containing the ascitic liquid). The ascitic liquid passed through the membranes where it was concentrated by ultrafiltration and was then reinjected into a vein of the patient. A flow rate of 0.6 l/h was observed for the ultra filtrate while the ascitic liquid which has been concentrated was reinjected into the patient at a flow rate of 0.3 l/h.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7077961, | Dec 18 2000 | GAMBRO INDUSTRIES | Apparatus for extracorporeal blood or plasma treatment comprising a wet semi-permeable membrane and methods for making the same |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3129273, | |||
3247133, | |||
3376168, | |||
3532527, | |||
3591493, | |||
3592672, | |||
3615024, | |||
3616930, | |||
3647086, | |||
3648754, | |||
3723306, | |||
3750735, | |||
3799355, | |||
3799356, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 18 1990 | Hospal Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 04 1996 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 04 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 04 1997 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 04 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 04 2000 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 04 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 04 2001 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 04 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 04 2004 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 04 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 04 2005 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 04 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |